Detailed Project Report of Godavari (Inchampalli/Janampet) –

Cauvery (Grand Anicut) link project

CHECK LIST
I GENERAL DATA
1 Name of the project Godavari (Inchampalli/Janampet) –
Cauvery (Grand Anicut) link project
2 Location Latitude- 10⁰ 50' 19'' to 18⁰ 41' 22'' N &
Longitude- 78⁰ 41' 51'' to 80⁰ 2' 18'' E
a State (s) (i) Project area: Telangana, Andhra
Pradesh & Tamil Nadu
(ii) Other riparian States: Maharashtra,
Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh,
Chhattisgarh, Odisha
b District (s) (i) Telangana: Jayashankar Bhoopalapalli,
Warngal, Khammam & Nalgonda
(ii) Andhra Pradesh: Krishna, Guntur,
Prakasam, Chittoor & Nellore
(iii) Tamil Nadu: Tiruvallur, Vellore,
Kancheepuram, Tiruvannamalai,
Villupuram, Cuddalore, Perambalur &
Tiruchhirapalli
c Taluka (s) A no. of talukas/mandals in the above
districts of the project area will get
benefited.
d Location of Head works Latitude (N) Longitude (E)
(1) Inchampalli barrage 18⁰ 37' 00'' 80⁰ 20' 00''
(2) Janampet barrage 18⁰ 06' 11'' 80⁰ 44' 24''
(3) Nagarjunasagar dam 16⁰ 34' 23'' 79⁰ 18' 47''
(4) Somasila dam 14⁰ 29' 15'' 79⁰ 18' 25'' '
(5) Grand Anicut 10⁰ 49' 50'' 70⁰ 57' 32'' '
e Survey of India Topo-sheets 65B/2,3&6,56N/15&16, 56O/4,8,11to15,
1:50,000 Scale 56P/1,2,5to8,11,12,15&16, 56L/9&13,
57M/5 to 11, 57N/ 5 to 8,11&12, 57O/9
to 12&14, 57P/8,9,10,11, 58M/ 1 to 5, 7

i
 & 8, 58J/13
f Earthquake Zone The project lies in Seismic Zones- II & III
as per the zoning map of India (IS 1897 –
1984)
g Complete address for Superintending Engineer,
correspondence along with National Water Development Agency, 1st
pin code/e-mail Floor, Mahatma Gandhi Markfed Bhavan,
5-2-68, Jambagh, Hyderabad. Telangana
500001
Ph: 040-24601209 Fax : 040-24601207
Email : [email protected]
3 Category of the project
a Irrigation or Multipurpose Multipurpose
b Storage or diversion Diversion
II PLANNING
4 Has the Master plan for The master plans/planning by the
overall development of the respective states have been discussed in
river basin been prepared and the report as necessary.
stages of basin development
discussed?
5 Have the alternative Yes. The aspects of various alternatives
proposals (including set of have been discussed.
smaller developments vis-à-
vis a single large
development) been studied
and their merits and demerits
discussed?
6 Does the scheme fit in the Yes
overall development of the
river basin and its priority in
the overall development of
the basin discussed?

7 Have the other Departments Yes

ii
 concerned with the
development been informed?
8 Is the present scheme Yes
proposed to be executed in
stages? If so, are its various
stages of execution and
development discussed in the
report?
9 Are the effects of the scheme Yes. The requirement of water for all the
on the riparian rights & existing, ongoing and future projects
existing upstream and located in the up-stream catchment and
downstream projects, etc. committed requirements in the
discussed? downstream have been duly accounted for
while arriving at the quantity of water for
diversion through the link project.
10 Has the provision for Yes.
municipal and industrial
water supply been made?
III INTERSTATE AND INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS
11 Are there any International / Yes.
Interstate issues involved? If
so, have these issues been
identified and present status
of agreement or tribunal
decision indicated specially
in respect of this project.
a Sharing of water The DPR shall form the basis for
b Sharing of cost discussions among the concerned States
on sharing of water, cost and benefits.
c Sharing of benefits
(irrigation, flood control,
power etc.)
d Acceptance of the The submergence due to the proposed
submergence by the upstream barrage at Inchampalli/Janampet is

iii
 State(s) confined to river portion only. Some land
e Acceptance by the upstream in Telangana State is coming under
State(s) of compensation of submergence of intermediary storages at
land coming under Tummalagutta and Peddavagu .
submergence.
f Settlement of oustees R&R package for PAFs, if any from the
link project will be evolved keeping in
view the provisions of Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act–
2013 after CEIA study.
IV SURVEYS
12 Have the detailed
topographical surveys been
carried out for the following
items and maps prepared as
per prescribed scales?
(a) River surveys Yes
(b) Pond surveys
(c) Head-works surveys Yes
(dam, dykes, barrages, weirs,
etc., and auxiliary
components)
(d) Plant and Colonies sites To be carried out at pre-construction
stage.
(e) Canals, branch canals and Yes. Surveys for main link canal were
water distribution system carried out. Please Refer Chapter-4:
‘Surveys & Investigations’ of Volume I-
Main Report and Volume-I of Appendix
A. Surveys for branch canals and water
distribution system shall be carried out
at pre-construction stage.
(f) Major canal structures Yes. Please Refer Chapter-4: ‘Surveys &
Investigations’ of Volume I-Main
Report and Volume-I of Appendix A.
(g) Power house, switch- Yes, carried out for the contemplated
yard, surge shafts, tailrace canal head power houses as part of canal

iv
 (h) Tunnel(s), adits, surveys.
penstocks, etc.
(i) Surveys(detailed and To be carried out at pre-construction
sample) of areas of the stage.
command for OFD and
drainage works
(j) Soil surveys Soil surveys (Land use/ land cover
(k) Surveys for mapping) carried out through NRSC for
soil
conservation the reach from Nagarjunasagar to
Somasila. These surveys are not required
for the command areas under
Inchampalli-Nagarjunasagar reach since
were already done by the State Govt.
Please refer Chapter-4 Volume I-Main
Report and Volume I-Appendix A.
Detailed soil surveys are be carried out
for the remaining reaches of the link
system at pre-construction stage.
(l) Any other surveys No. To be carried out at pre-construction
a)Archaeological, stage.
b)Mineral survey No. To be carried out at pre-construction
stage.
c)Right of way survey Surveys as required will be carried out at
pre-construction stage.
d)Communication survey Yes. Please refer Chapter-4 of Volume
I- Main Report &Volume I of Appendix
A.
V GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
13 Have the geological surveys Yes. The preliminary geological
for the following items been investigations are carried out by GSI for
carried out and report on all the reaches. Please refer Chapter 4 of
geology of the following Volume I-Main Report & Volume I of
appended? Appendix A.
a Region as whole Yes.
b Reservoir( Local Geology) In respect of barrage at Janampet,
detailed surveys are to be carried out at

v
 pre-construction stage.
c Head works and energy In respect of barrage at Janampet,
dissipation area detailed surveys are to be carried out at
pre-construction stage.
d Power house and In respect of canal head power house at
appurtenances Musi/Nagarjunasagar reservoir, detailed
surveys are to be carried out at pre-
construction stage.
e Intakes and regulators To be carried out at pre-construction
f Major canal structures stage.
g Tunnel(s), Penstock(s),
hill(s), etc.
h Communication routes May not be required.
VI SEISMIC INVESTIGATIONS
14 Has the Seismicity of the The link canal takes off from proposed
region been studied and co- barrage at Inchampalli/Janampet on
efficient of vertical / Godavari river and out falls into existing
horizontal acceleration for Grand Anicut on Cauvery river, utilising
the various structures Nagarjunasagar on Krishna river and
discussed? Somasila on Pennar river as balancing
15 Has the approval of the reservoirs. Since no new dam/reservoir
National Committee for is proposed for diversion of water
recommending design of through the link canal, no site specific
seismic co-efficients for seismic studies are conducted at present.
River Valley Projects Such studies, if required will be carried
(NCSDP) been obtained? out at pre-construction stage.
16 Is there a possibility of
liquefaction of foundations?
If so whether liquefaction
studies been carried out?

VII FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS

17 Have the detailed foundation
investigations (including in-situ

vi
 tests and laboratory tests) for the
following structures been carried
out and detailed report(s)
appended?
a Earth and rock fill No new dam is involved. For
dam/barrage/weir.etc barrage, the foundation
b Masonry/concrete dam/weir, etc. investigations (drilling) are carried
c Barrage(s)/Weir(s)//head out.
regulator(s) etc
d Canal(s) & Canal Structures Yes, carried out at feasibility report
stage. Please refer Chapter 4 of
Volume I-Main Report.
e Power house(s), tunnel(s), Yes, carried out for tunnels at
transformer cavern(s), desilting feasibility report stage. To be
chamber(s), surge tank(s)/ carried out for canal head power
shaft(s), intake(s) canal structures, houses at pre-construction stage.
etc.
18 Are there any special features No
affecting the designs?
VIII CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SURVEY
19 Have the surveys and laboratory
tests for the following
construction materials been
carried out and report(s)
appended?
a Soils for impervious, semi- No earth and rock-fill dam is
pervious and pervious zones of proposed.
earth and rock-fill dam(s)
b Sand Yes, carried out at feasibility stage.
c Rock and coarse aggregate Please refer Chapter 4 of Volume I-
Main Report & Volume-I of
Appendix A.
d Bricks and tiles Available locally in the vicinity of
the project area

vii
e Pozzolona Not considered to be used in the
construction of the project
f Cement and lime stone Required cement for construction
of the project is available in project
area.
g Steel To be procured from the plants
located within the project region
h Any other -
20 Have the sources for each of the Yes, Please refer Chapter 4 of
above material been identified and Volume-I Main Report & Volume-
need etc. indicated? I of Appendix A.
21 Have the proposals for No scarce materials are anticipated
procurement of scarce materials to be used in the project which may
been indicated? cause hindrance to the construction
of the project.
IX HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
22 (a)Have the hydrological and
meteorological investigations been
carried out and status of following
data discussed in report?
i Rainfall Yes, Please refer Chapter 4 of
ii Temperature Volume-I Main Report &
iii Sunshine Volume-I of Appendix A.
iv Gauge & Discharge
v Sediment
vi Water quality
vii Evaporation
viii Wind speed Yes, Please refer Chapter 4 of
Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix A.
(b) Has the above data been collected Yes, collected.
& appended?
X HYDROLOGY

viii
23 Is the hydrology dealt with in details No separate volume. Details are
in a separate volume? Have its brief furnished in Chapter–5 of
details been included in this report? Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix.
24 Have an index map and bar chart Yes, index map of the link
showing locations of various hydro- project and the basin maps of
metric, climatic and rainfall stations Godavari, Krishna, Pennar and
existing/ongoing/planned water Cauvery are included in
resources projects and the data Volume-III: Drawings.
availability at those stations been
attached?
25 Have required detail note about Yes, Please refer Chapter-5 of
project specific hydro-meteorological Volume-I Main Report &
data observatories been attached? Volume-I of Appendix.
26 Have required detail in case of Not Applicable
Himalayan rivers, if project being
planned in upper reaches, the satellite
imageries of project catchment
especially one during snowmelt
period (March-may) and one during
monsoon (June-September) period
been attached?
27 Are details notes about quality, Yes, Please refer Chapter-5 of
consistency, processing and gap Volume-I Main Report &
filling of the data included Volume-I of Appendix.

28 Have hydrological studies been

carried out for the following:
a To establish the availability of water Yes, Please refer Chapter-5 of
for the benefits envisaged. Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix.
b To determine design flood for the Since the diversion is proposed
various structures (Spillway, weir, from the proposed

ix
 barrage, etc.) Inchampalli/Janampet barrage,
c Sediments storage the aspects of design flood and
d Design flood for diversion during diversion flood etc., are not
construction discussed in the present study
e Tail water rating curve Not applicable
f Evaporation rates from Yes, data collected. Please refer
reservoirs/concerned area Chapter-8 in Volume-I- Main
g Command area rainfall Report & Volume-I of
Appendix.
29 Has the Ground Water Potential Yes. Please refer Chapter-8 in
(existing use and additional Volume-I-Main Report &
availability) been indicated ? Chapter-9 of Volume-I of
Appendix.
30 Have the studies regarding reservoir Simulation studies for proposed
sedimentation been carried out and Inchampalli/Janampet barrages
revised Elevation-Area Capacity have been carried out
curves been used in the simulation considering Elevation-Area
studies? (Working Table)? Capacity values taken from
Inchampalli project report/
generated from field
surveys/maps. Please refer
Chapter-5 of Volume-I Main
Report & Volume-I of
Appendix.
31 Have the ecological requirements of Since, water are being proposed
water such as low flow augmentation for diversion through the link
and water quality control etc. and project only during the
water requirement for domestic, monsoon period and also
industrial use and power generation several streams (including
(thermal, hydel, nuclear) been Sabari river) are joining the
considered and included in the Godavari river d/s of
Project Report and incorporated in Inchampalli/Janampet barrage,
the simulation studies? no adverse effect on account of
link diversion is anticipated. As

x
 such, no ecological
requirements are considered.
The proposed diversion of 7000
Mm3 of water through the link
project considered in the
simulation studies is for
extending irrigation, domestic
and industrial water supply
benefits in the project area.
Please refer Chapter-5 of
Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix.
32 Have the details of the simulation Yes. Please refer Chapter-5 of
studies (Working Table) and Volume-I Main Report &
conclusions arrived from the various Volume-I of Appendix.
alternatives explaining the factors and
assumptions been included and
discussed?
33 Have the number of failures for
different aspects been indicated?
34 Have the likely desirable and No adverse effect on
undesirable changes in the hydrologic downstream hydrologic regime
regime due to the project been is anticipated since diversion of
brought out in the report? water is proposed out of
available spills at
Inchampalli/Janampet barrage.
35 Is the criteria adopted for selection of Since the diversion is proposed
the construction diversion flood from the proposed
discussed? Inchampalli/Janampet barrage,
the aspects of diversion flood
are not discussed in the present
study
36 Has the basis for determining the Yes. Please refer Chapter-5 of
storage capacity been discussed? Volume-I Main Report &

xi
 Volume-I of Appendix.
37 Have integrated working tables (for Simulation for only
more than one reservoir in the Inchampalli/Janampet has been
system) been prepared? carried out. However, it was
studied whether Nagarjunasagar
reservoir has enough storage
space to accommodate the link
waters and by which date
further diversion from
Nagarjunasagar should take
place at the earliest so as not to
spill.
38 Has carry over storage been Not applicable. The proposed
prepared? If so, whether studies for diversion is from a barrage.
most economic carry over storage
been done?
39 Have the flood routing studies been
carried out?
40 Have the back water studies been
carried out?
XI LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT OF OUSTEES
41 Have the type and quantum of land Yes, Please refer Chapter- 11 &
proposed to be acquired in the 12 of Volume-I Main Report &
submerged area, project area, area Chapter-12 in Volume-I of
coming under canal and distribution Appendix A. This will be
system, area required for firmed up during the CEIA
rehabilitation of the oustees been study of the link project.
detailed?
42 Is the basis for provision for land Yes, Please refer Chapter- 13 of
compensation indicated? Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix A.
43 Have the rehabilitation measures, The rehabilitation measures,
amenities and facilities to be provided amenities and facilities to be
to the Project Affected Persons been provided to the Project Affected

xii
 discussed and whether their Persons, if any shall be finalized
provisions included in the report? Are during the CEIA study of the
these in accordance State’s link project.
policy/project specific policy/draft
national policy for rehabilitation and
resettlement?
44 Are the basis of land acquisition of Yes, Please refer Chapter- 11 of
the submerged area upto FRL/MWL Volume-I Main Report &
etc. discussed? Volume-I of Appendix A.
XII DESIGNS
45 Does the State have established a Not applicable. Designs are
Central Design Organisation and carried out by NWDA.
State level multidisciplinary Advisory
Committee and whether its
composition has been indicated in the
report
46 Has the selection of final location of Yes
the head works and appurtenances, in
preference to the other sites
investigated, been discussed?
47 Have the layout of the project viz., Yes. Locations of Head works
location of head works, workshop have been finalised.
sheds, offices, colonies, etc. been
finalized and discussed?
48 Has the layout of the various major Yes, Please refer Chapter-6:
components of the head works been Design aspects in Volume-I:
discussed in the light of site feature, Main report & Volume-I of
geology, and foundation Appendix A.
characteristics, etc.
49 Have the detailed designs been Designs of various components
prepared for the following of the project have been carried
components and got vetted by CDO? out by NWDA.
a Earth or rock fill dam, masonry or Yes. Design of barrage and its
concrete dam, spillway, barrage, weir, appurtenances has been carried

xiii
 etc. and appurtenances. out. Please refer Chapter-6 of
Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix.
b Energy dissipation arrangements, Not applicable
training wells, etc.
c Openings through dam-galleries, head Yes. Design of head regulator
regulators, penstocks, other outlets, has been carried out. Please
sluices, etc. refer Chapter-6 of Volume-I
Main Report & Volume-I of
Appendix.
d Regulators Yes, Please refer Chapter-6 of
e Canal and water conductor system Volume-I Main Report &
f Canal structures Volume-I of Appendix.
g Pump house , intake structures
h Power house, tunnels, surge shaft Yes –Designs for tunnels along
the canal alignment and power
house are carried out. Please
refer Chapter-6 of Volume-I
Main Report & Volume-I of
Appendix.
i Instrumentation To be taken up at pre-
construction stage as necessary
j Power evacuation arrangement Power evacuation studies are to
be carried out at pre-
construction stage for the solar
power component planned on
canal top/bank and hydro power
through canal head power
house.
k Design of Hydro Mechanical Yes, Please refer Chapter-6 of
equipments Volume-I Main Report &
Volume-I of Appendix A.
50 Have the salient features of the above Yes. Please refer Chapter-6 of
components and the assumptions Volume-I Main Report &

xiv
 made in the design of above Volume-I of Appendix A.
components of the project been
indicated and basis of assumption
discussed?
51 Have any model studies been carried No proposed dam is involved.
out for location of the dam, spillway
and other appurtenances checking the
design profile of the spillway, energy
dissipation arrangements, location of
outlets/ regulators, etc?
52 Has the final alignment of canal(s) Yes, discussed for main canal.
and branch canal(s) been discussed in
the light of various alignments
studied?
a. Does the canal design provide for No. Since the link diversion is
meeting requirements of rush planned mostly from the spills
irrigation? as available at Inchampalli/
Janampet and is not according
to the water demands in the
command area, additional
capacity towards rush irrigation
is not considered.
b. Have any intermediate storages and Yes. Existing Nagarjunasagar
tail tanks been considered to reduce on river Krishna and Somasila
the canal capacities? on river Pennar have been
considered as balancing
reservoirs to supplement the
pond storage at Inchampalli/
Janampet barrage.
53 Are the canals and distribution system Main canal is proposed to be
being lined and if so what is the lined. The minimum capacity of
minimum capacity of the channel main link canal at tail end is
proposed to be lined? 351 cumec.
54 Is the location of canal structures on Yes. Fixed after detailed

xv
 main and branch canals fixed after surveys for main canal. For
detailed surveys of the final branch canals/pipe distribution
alignments? network, locations of canal
structures are to be fixed at pre-
construction stage.
55 Are the regulation arrangements of Yes
the off-taking channel both near and
away from the cross regulators
discussed?
56 Are sufficient escapes including Yes. provided for main canal.
terminal escapes provided on the
main/branch canal distributaries/
minors?
57 Have the basis for adopting water Yes
way for the cross drainage works
been discussed?
58 Have the proposals for rating the No
canal section by providing standing
wave flumes, rating of the falls, broad
crested weirs. V-notches etc. been
discussed for the canal and
distribution system?
59 Have any model studies for major No
canal structure(s) been carried out and
if so, are the results discussed and
incorporated in the design?
XIII IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT
60 Have the conveyance and field Yes. Refer Chapter-8 of
irrigation efficiencies for paddy and Volume-I Main Report &
upland crops during Kharif, rabi, etc. Volume-I of Appendix A.
been indicated, discussed and
justified?
61 Have the 10-daily/monthly Crop Yes, Monthly crop water
water requirements at the canal head requirements are worked out.

xvi
 been worked out?
62 Are there any proposals for Not proposed now. These shall
introducing Warabandi and if so have be finalised subsequently.
these proposals been discussed in the
report and sample calculations for a
typical distributary / minor / sub-
minor furnished?
63 Has the present position of irrigation Yes
in the command through existing
canals, tanks, lift schemes, wells, etc.
been brought out in the report?
64 Are the particulars of all irrigation Yes
projects (including minor schemes)
existing/proposed in the command
been indicated?
65 Are there potential areas, where Yes, Please refer Chapter- 1 &
ground water is available? If so, has
8 of Volume-I Main Report and
the quantity & quality of the groundChapter- 9 of Volume-I of
water been indicated? Appendix A.
66 Has the quantum of available ground Yes, Please refer Chapter- 1 &
water been assessed and plan for its8 of Volume-I Main Report and
conjunctive use with surface water Chapter- 9 of Volume-I of
been prepared and incorporated in the
Appendix A. Conjunctive use is
report? not incorporated in the DPR,
but its scope is mentioned.
67 Have the semi-detailed soil surveys Soil surveys (Land use/ land
been carried out for the entire cover mapping) carried out
command? If not the extent of area through NRSC for the reach
surveyed may be indicated. from Nagarjunasagar to
Somasila. The soil surveys for
the command areas in the
remaining reaches shall be
carried out at pre-construction
stage.

xvii
68 Have soil and land irrigability Land irrigability classifications
classifications brought out in the was got done through NRSC for
report? the reach from Nagarjunasagar
to Somasila. Yes. Please refer
Chapter-4 of Volume-I Main
Report
69 Is the method used for determining Yes. Please refer Chapter -8 of
the crop water requirements Volume-I Main Report &
discussed? Volume-I of Appendix A.
70 Has the pre-project cropping pattern Yes
and the proposed cropping pattern
along with justification been
furnished?
71 Has the proposed cropping pattern No. To be got certified from the
been certified by Centre/State Agricultural Authorities of the
Agricultural Authorities giving the respective States.
Statement of having considered the
soil characteristics and land
irrigability characteristics of the
command area in deciding the
percentage of the command area
falling under respective crops as
suggested in DPR?
72 Whether drinking water needs of the Yes. Drinking water needs of
population projected for the 25-30 the population projected to 2050
years after construction of the project AD in the command area are
on enroute and that in the command considered.
of the project considered?
73 Whether the proposed G.W utilisation No G.W. utilisation is planned
is certified by CGWB and a statement in the proposal.
furnished
74 Are the areas and percentages of the Yes
CCA that will be irrigated during
kharif, rabi, two seasonal, summer

xviii
 and perennial been indicated?
75 Is justification furnished for irrigating Yes. These constitute minimal
perennials and summer crops from the percentage.
reservoir?
76 Have the monthly reservoir operation Yes. Daily simulation of
studies been carried out at least for 20
Inchampalli/Janampet pond for
years and summary on annual basis 30 years (1981-82 to 2010-11)
attached? has been carried out. Please
refer Chapter-5 of Volume-I :
Main report & Volume-I of
Appendix A.
77 Have the number of blocks selected No. Proposed to be carried out
for detailed surveys for On Farm at pre-construction stage.
Development (OFD) works including
drainage and total area covered by
such blocks been indicated?
78 Have the existing locations of the Yes
Trial cum Demonstration Farm, input
centres (seeds, fertilizer and
insecticides) in the command been
indicated and proposal to strengthen
the same discussed?
79 Have the arrangements for financing No
the OFD works and proposals if any,
for strengthening the same been
discussed?
80 Have the agencies responsible for No. Will be identified at pre-
execution of the OFD works been construction stage.
identified and simultaneous planning
of execution of OFD works along
with engineering works discussed?
81 Has the year-wise phasing of Yes
irrigation development as a result of
the project been discussed?

xix
82 Is the existing communication system Yes, Suitable provisions have
telephone, wireless, and roads within been kept in the estimate for
command area sufficient to meet the coping with the future
requirement after full development of development.
irrigation? If not, have the new
proposals been planned and
discussed?
83 Is the adequacy of the marketing Yes
centres in the Command Area and
new proposals to meet the
requirements after full development
of irrigation been discussed?
84 Is there any stabilisation of existing Yes
irrigation proposed?
XIV FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
85 Have the various flood control Not Applicable. All head works
components of the multipurpose are either barrages or existing
project been indicated? projects.
86 Have the damage areas in pre-project Not Applicable
& post project situations been
identified and flood intensities
worked out at each of the damage
centre(s) which gets affected?
87 Have the following flood aspects been Not Applicable. All head works
discussed? are either barrages or existing
projects.
a Flood cushion in the reservoir Not Applicable
b Maximum moderated flood out flows Not Applicable
over the spillway etc. and its
frequency
c Existing and proposed safe carrying Not Applicable
capacities of the channel below the
dam after construction of flood
embankment, channel improvement,

xx
 river diversion, etc.
d Synchronized moderated peak floods Not Applicable
due to release(s) from the dam
upstream and unintercepted
catchment upto the damage centers
e Average annual expenditure incurred Not Applicable
on flood relief works

f Area and population affected/likely to Not Applicable

be affected before/after the project
g Estimated saving in annual loss of Not Applicable
life, property, cattle, crops, etc.
(evaluated in terms of money) due to
flood control.
88 Have the following drainage aspects
of command area been discussed?
a Existing Surface and sub-surface Yes
drainage network and problems of the
drainage congestion, water logging,
alkalinity/salinity, if any.
b Studies on sub soil water table (pre- No
monsoon, post-monsoon etc.)
c Maximum intensity of 1,2 & 3 day No
rainfall
d Deficiencies in farm drains No
e Deficiencies in existing natural drains No
f Proposal for improvement of drainage Yes, suitable provision has been
/ water logging/alkalinity/salinity of made in the cost estimate.
the area along with justification
thereof.
g Identification of the area in Command No. Will be identified during
which will get benefited due to pre-construction stage
execution of drainage network and
benefits thereof in terms of relief
from crop damage, increased yields,

xxi
 etc.
XV NAVIGATION
89 Is the present scheme for remodeling Navigation aspect is not
of the existing facilities and /or planned in the project proposal.
extension of the navigable reach or
establishing new navigable reach?
90 Is the existing inland transport system Not Applicable
being fully utilized? If not, have the
bottlenecks in its full utilization been
identified and discussed?
91 Have the surveys for goods and
passenger traffic been carried out and
discussed?
92 Is the extent of modification required
in the existing system discussed and
justified?
93 Do design for the canal sections and
structures take into account the
navigation requirements?
94 Have the proposals to develop the
new scheme and phases of
development in the different reaches
been discussed?
95 If the area is being served by inland The project area is not being
water transport, have the following served by inland water transport
been discussed:
a The existing toll rates and registration Not Applicable
fees, for the crafts(size wise)
b Proposals for revision of tollage rates
and fees, if any
c Concurrence of the competent
authorities for revision of rates and
fees.
d Proposal to subsidize the tariff,

xxii
 tollage, craft registration fee,
passenger fare, etc. to attract traffic.
96 Has the State Inland Water Authority Not Applicable
been consulted while finalizing the
scheme and its view point discussed?
97 Has economic justification and Not Applicable
viability of the navigation component
of the multipurpose project been
discussed?
XVI POWER
98 Have the following points been
discussed?
a Availability of the power generating Yes, Refer Chapter-9 of
capacity in the State as well as in the Volume-I Main Report &
region from different sources Chapter-10 of Volume-I of
b Total energy available and peaking Appendix A.
capacity of the system in the State as
well as in the region from different
sources.
c Integrated operation of the system and
present status of utilisation in the
State as well as in the region.
d Surpluses and shortfalls in the system
in the State as well as in the region.
e Future plans of power development
from different sources in the
State/region.
f Fitment of the scheme in planning of
power development of the
State/region
g Energy generated from the project, Yes. Hydro power at canal head
firm power; seasonal power and total power houses and solar power
power generation through canal
top/bank solar plants is

xxiii
 proposed. Refer Chapter-9 of
Volume-I Main Report &
Chapter-10 of Volume-I of
Appendix A.
h Proposal for transmission lines To be planned at pre-
connecting to the existing system/grid construction stage
i Project cost per kwh installed and per No.
kwh generated at bus bar as
compared to the different hydro-
electric, thermal generation and gas
projects and different sources in the
State as well as in the region to justify
the power component of the project.
j Whether the proposed addition to the To be taken up at pre-
transmission system has been shown construction stage
on a geographical map. Whether
options considered for the proposed
addition have been discussed with
statement of justification for the
selected option after carrying out
supporting studies covering load flow
studies, short-circuit studies (three
phase and single phase) and stability
studies
XVII CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME AND PLANT AND
MANPOWER PLANNING
99 Are the major components of work Through contractor
proposed to be done departmentally
or through contractor?
100 Have the various alternative Yes
construction programme been studied
and proper justification furnished for
the final programme adopted?
101 Has the proposed construction Yes

xxiv
 programme been prepared and
synchronized for timely completion
of each of the major component of
work including Command Area
Development?
102 Have the year wise quantities of the
following materials of construction
been worked out for various
components of the project?
a Excavation separately in – soft and Total quantities of the required
hard strata materials have been worked out.
b Earthwork in filling-impervious, Please refer Chapter-10 of
Volume-I Main Report
semi-pervious and pervious
c Rockfill- for dam, toe, riprap, etc.
d Stone for masonry
e Coarse aggregate for concrete
f Sand – for filter, masonry/ concrete
g Gravel – for filter
h Steel of various sizes and type
i Cement- normal, quick/slow setting
with or without pozzolana, special
types
j Lime –surkhi - pozzolana
k Scarce material – special steel
l Other material – fuel, electricity,
explosive, etc.
103 Have the year wise quantities to be Yes
executed by machine/labour for each
of the major component been worked
out for each of the above material
104 Have the labour intensive items of the No
various major components of the
project been identified and the
quantities of such items worked out?

xxv
 105 Have PERT chart or CPM diagrams Yes. Bar Chart is prepared for
for construction programme of construction programme.
various components been made and
included in report? Has organization
set up and frequency for project
monitoring been indicated in the
Report.
XVIII FOREIGN EXCHANGE
106 Have the details of the plant and Not visualized as of now. Most
machinery, spares, instruments and of the requirements of plants
scarce materials to be imported and machinery, spares,
worked out? equipments / instruments, etc
would be procured
indigenously.
107 Has the phasing of imports and No
source(s) of imports been discussed
item wise?
108 Are the imports to be affected under Not Applicable
foreign grants/credits or internal
resources of the country?
109 Is the scheme covered under State Central sector
sector or Central sector
XIX FINANCIAL RESOURCES
110 Has the concurrence of the State Not Applicable
Finance Department been obtained?
111 Is the scheme included in the Five Not yet included. DPR is
year/Annual plan? If not, what is the prepared.
present position regarding its
inclusion in the plan?
112 Whether the scheme has already been Yet to be started
started? If so, is the present stage of
construction indicated?
113 Have the year wise requirement of Yes, Please refer Chapter-10 of
funds been indicated? Volume-I Main Report

xxvi
114 Is the scheme covered or proposed to No
be covered under any foreign
assistance/aid agreement?
XX ESTIMATE
115 Is the separate volume of estimate No. Included as part of Volume-
attached as appendix? II Annexures of Main DPR as
well as Appendix A.
116 Is the year to which the rates adopted Yes, Please refer Chapter-13 of
in the estimate relate to indicated? Volume-I Main Report &
Appendix A.
117 Have the analysis of rates for various Yes, Please refer Chapter-13 of
major items of work for the major Volume-I Main Report &
components of the project been Appendix A.
furnished and with basis of analysis
described?
118 Are the provisions for the following Provision is made on the basis
items made on the basis of sample of lump sum rate.
survey and sub-estimates:
a Distributaries, minor and sub-minors
b Water courses
c Drainage
d CAD works
XXI REVENUES
119 Are the basis for the following
sources of revenues furnished?
a Betterment levy and proposal for its Not Applicable
recovery
b Irrigation cess Yes. Please refer Chapter-14 of
Volume-I Main Report &
Appendix A.
c Flood protection cess Not Applicable
d Crop wise water rates No
e Sale of water for village/ city/ Yes. The rates fixed by
industrial/power /water supply Hyderabad Metropolitan Water

xxvii
 Supply and Sewerage Board are
considered. Please refer
Chapter-14 of Volume-I Main
Report & Appendix A.
120 Have these rates been compared with No Comparison done. The rates
the existing rates at the other projects fixed by Hyderabad
in the State region? Metropolitan Water Supply and
Sewerage Board are considered.
121 In case the rates are being enhanced, The rates fixed by Hyderabad
has the concurrence of the concerned Metropolitan Water Supply and
department(s) been obtained? Sewerage Board are considered.
122 Have the organizational set up for the No, existing set up respective
collection of revenue been indicated? State Govts. can be utilized.
XXII B-C RATIO
123 Are the allocated costs for the Unit/Head wise cost is assessed.
following components of the Use wise cost apportionment is
multipurpose project worked out and not done.
basis therein furnished?
(a) Irrigation No
(b) Power No
(c) Flood Control Not Applicable
(d) Navigation Not Applicable
(e) Domestic water supply No
(f) Industrial water supply No
124 Have the various departments of the The stage has not arisen as of
State/Centre agreed to the sharing of now.
the above allocated cost?
125 Have the crop wise benefits been No. Worked out as per the
worked out for irrigated and un guidelines and prevailing
irrigated crops being grown before market rates.
project in consultation with the
agriculture department and Statement
furnished?
126 Have the crop wise benefits been No. Worked out as per the

xxviii
 worked out for proposed cropping guidelines and prevailing
pattern after the introduction of market rates.
irrigation in consultation with the
agriculture department and Statement
furnished?
127 Is the B.C. ratio of Irrigation ProjectsB.C ratio is calculated for the
acceptable or otherwise justified? whole project- not component
wise
128 Is the B.C. ratio for Flood Control Not Applicable
Projects acceptable or otherwise
justified?
129 Is the B.C. ratio for power component B.C ratio is calculated for the
of the project acceptable or otherwise whole project- not component
justified? wise
130 Have the financial and economic Yes
return Statements been furnished
keeping in view the phasing of
development?
131 Are the benefits other than those Yes. There is additional benefit
considered in the B.C. ratio and of energy generation through
financial return Statement been canal top/bank solar plants.
identified? Please refer Chapter-9 Power of
Volume-I Main Report &
Chapter-10 Volume-I of
Appendix A.
132 Is the benefit from Gallper land, if Not Applicable
proposed, based on lease rates
admissible and Statement from
concerned Central /State authorities
furnished?
133 Are the benefits from fisheries, Yes; Please refer Chapter-9
horticulture, if proposed, based on Power of Volume-I Main
lease rates admissible and Statement Report & Chapter-10 Volume-I
from concerned Central/State of Appendix A.

xxix
 authorities furnished?
XXIII ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS
134 (a) Is the area likely to have any of
the following environmental and
ecological problems due to the altered
surface water pattern? If yes whether
preventive measures have been
discussed?
i Excessive sedimentation of the Not likely. Only a barrage is
reservoir and the upper reaches of the proposed. The sediment will be
river and its tributaries tailing into flushed downstream regularly.
reservoir
ii Water logging, salinity/alkalinity Not likely
iii Quality of surface and ground water Not likely
iv Groundwater recharge No. In fact, groundwater table
will improve in the down-
stream areas of the proposed
storages.
v Health hazard-water borne diseases, Not likely
industrial pollution, etc.
vi Submergence of important minerals No
deposits
vii Submergence of monuments/ No.
archeological sites
viii Fish culture and aquatic life No. In fact, fisheries production
is likely to improve
considerably due to the creation
of the barrage pond.
ix Plant life (flora) No
x Wild Life No
xi Migratory birds Not likely. In fact, the bird
population will improve on
account of creation of storages/
tanks.

xxx
xii National Park and sanctuaries No
xiii Seismicity due to filling of reservoir Not likely since a medium sized
barrage/pond only is proposed.
xiv Likely change in the regime of the Not likely
river
xv Any other No
(b) Have the environmental and forest Yet to be obtained. The ToR for
clearance from MoE&F been the proposed CEIA studies of
obtained? If not what is status the project are being submitted.
thereof?
XXIV COLONIES AND BUILDINGS
135 Has the planning of the Yes
colony/building been done keeping in
view the ultimate use for optimum
utilization of the investment?
136 Has an estimate of the extent of No
higher cost involved been made and
details discussed?
137 Are the permanent buildings being Yes. Provision is made as per
constructed required for maintenance the guidelines for preparation of
of the project only? DPR of irrigation &
multipurpose projects-2010
138 Can the buildings other than required Yes. Can be used by Govt.
for maintenance of the project being departments or other project
constructed be put to some other use authorities
after the completion of the project by
the department or any other agencies?
139 Have the interested agencies been No. will be taken up at pre-
consulted in planning of the buildings construction stage.
to suit their requirements later on?
140 Have the proposals for disposal of Not discussed.
temporary buildings been discussed?
XXV PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND COOPERATION
141 Are the possibilities of these been

xxxi
 discussed in:
(a) Planning Yes
(b) Construction Yes
(c) Improved agricultural practices Yes
142 Have public debates about utility of Not yet. During the CEIA,
projects been held and the response public hearings will be
thereof outlined in the Report? conducted
XXVI Soil Conservation
143 Is the need for soil conservation No; will be taken up during the
measures in the catchment of the CEIA studies of the link project.
project discussed?

xxxii