IJP FamiyInterventionsPDF
IJP FamiyInterventionsPDF
net/publication/338696757
CITATIONS READS
4 3,062
3 authors:
Santosh Loganathan
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS)
40 PUBLICATIONS 590 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Santosh Loganathan on 18 July 2020.
DOI:
How to cite this article: Varghese M, Kirpekar V, Loganathan S.
Family interventions: Basic principles and techniques. Indian J
10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_770_19
Psychiatry 2020;62:S192-200.
medical issue, or mental health diagnosis. Specifically, family lurking problems within the family that may get discovered
therapists are relational therapists: They are generally more eventually during later assessments.
interested in what goes on between the individuals rather • Marital problems
than within one or more individuals. Depending on the • Parent–child conflict
conflicts at issue and the progress of therapy to date, a • Problems between siblings
therapist may focus on analyzing specific previous instances • The effects of illness on the family
of conflict, as by reviewing a past incident and suggesting • Adjustment problems among family members
alternative ways family members might have responded • Inconsistency parenting skills
to one another during it, or instead proceed directly to • Psychoeducation for family members about an index
addressing the sources of conflict at a more abstract level, patient’s illness
as by pointing out patterns of interaction that the family • Handling expresses emotions.
might not have noticed.
CHALLENGES FACED BY THE NOVICE
Family therapists tend to be more interested in the THERAPIST
maintenance and/or solving of problems rather than in
trying to identify a single cause. Some families may perceive Whether one is a young student, or a seasoned individual
cause‑effect analyses as attempts to allocate blame to one therapist, dealing with families can be intimidating at times
or more individuals, with the effect that for many families, but also very rewarding if one knows how to deal with them.
a focus on causation is of little or no clinical utility. It is We have outlined certain challenges that one faces while
important to note that a circular way of problem evaluation dealing with families, especially when one is beginning.
is used, especially in systemic therapies, as opposed to a
linear route. Using this method, families can be helped Being overeager to help
by finding patterns of behavior, what the causes are, and This can happen with beginner therapists as they are
what can be done to better their situation. Family therapy overeager and keen to help and offer suggestions straight
offers families a way to develop or maintain a healthy away. If the therapist starts dominating the interaction by
and functional family. Patients and families with more talking, advising, suggesting, commenting, questioning,
difficult and intractable problems such as poor prognosis and interpreting at the beginning itself, the family falls
schizophrenia, conduct and personality disorder, chronic silent. It is advisable to probe with open‑ended questions
neurotic conditions require family interventions and initially to understand the family.
therapy. The systemic framework approach offers advanced
family therapy for such families. This type of advanced Poor leadership
therapy requires training that very few centers, such as It is advisable for the therapist to have control over the
the Family Psychiatry Center at the National Institute of sessions. Sometimes, there may be other individuals/
Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, family members who maybe authoritative and take control.
Karnataka, India offer to trainees and residents. These Especially in crisis situations, when the family fails to
sessions may last anywhere from eight sessions up to 20 or function as a unit, the therapist should take control of the
more on occasions [Table 1]. session and set certain conditions which in his professional
judgment, maximize the chances for success.
Goals of family therapy
Usual goals of family therapy are improving the Not immersing or engaging/fear or involving
communication, solving family problems, understanding A common problem for the beginning therapist is to become
and handling special family situations, and creating a overly involved with the family. However, he may realize this
better functioning home environment. In addition, it also and try to panic and withdraw when he can become distant
involves: and cold. Rather, one should gently try to join in with the
1. Exploring the interactional dynamics of the family and family earning their true respect and trust before heading
its relationship to psychopathology to build rapport.
2. Mobilizing the family’s internal strength and functional
resources Focusing only on index patient
3. Restructuring the maladaptive interactional family Many families believe that their problem is because of the
styles (including improving communication) index patient, whereas it may seem a tactical error to focus
4. Strengthening the family’s problem‑solving behavior. on this person initially. In doing so, it may essentially agree
to the family’s hypothesis that their problem is arising out of
Reasons for family interventions this person. It is preferable, at the outset to inform the family
The usual reasons for referral are mentioned below. that the problem may lie with the family (especially when
However, it may be possible that sometimes the reasons referrals are made for family therapies involving multiple
identified initially may be just a pointer to many other members), and not necessarily with any one individual.
Not including all members for sessions Ignoring previous work done by other therapists
Many therapeutic efforts fail because important family It is easy for family therapists to ignore previous therapists.
members are not included in the sessions. It is advisable The family therapist’s ignorance of the effects of previous
to find out initially who are the key members involved and therapy can serious hamper the work. By discussing the
who should be attending the sessions. Sometimes, involving previous therapist helps the new therapist to understand
all members initially and then advising them to return to the problem easily and could save time also.
therapy as and when the need arises is recommended.
Getting sucked to the family’s affective state/mood
Not involving members during sessions If transference involves the therapist in family structure, the
Even though one has involved all members of the family in therapist’s dependency can overinvolved him in the family’s
the sessions, not all of them may be engaged during the style and tone of interaction. A depressed family causes
sessions. Sometimes, the therapist’s own transference may both: Therapist to relate seriously and sadly. A hostile family
hold back a member of the family in the sessions. Rather, may cause the therapist to relate in an attacking manner.
it is recommended that the therapist makes it clear that The most serious problem can occur when a family is in a
he/she is open to their presence and interactions, either state of anxiety, induces the therapist to become anxious
verbally or nonverbally. and make his/her comments to seem accusatory and
blaming. It is very difficult for the beginning therapist to
Taking sides with any member of the family “feel” where the family is affectively, to be empathic, yet
It may be easy to fall into the trap of taking one member’s to be able to relate at times on a different affective level‑to
side during sessions leaving the other party doubting respond according to situations. It is important to be aware
the fairness and judgment of the therapist. For example, of the affective state/mood of the family but slips in and out
after meeting one marital partner for a few sessions, the of that state [Table 2].
therapist, when entering the couple, discussions may be
FUNCTIONS OF A FAMILY THERAPIST
heavily biased in his views due to his/her prior interaction.
Therapists should be aware of this effect and try to be
1. The family therapist establishes a useful rapport:
neutral as possible yet take into confidence each member
Empathy and communication among the family
attending the sessions. Therapist’s countertransference
members and between them and himself
can easily influence him/her to take sides, especially in
2. The therapist uses the rapport to evoke the expression
families that are overtly blaming from the start, or with
of major conflicts and ways of coping.
one member who may be aggressive in the sessions, or
• The therapist clarifies conflict by dissolving barriers,
very submissive during the sessions can influence the
confusions, and misunderstandings
therapist’s sides; and one needs to be aware of this early
• Gradually, the therapist attempts to bring to the
in the sessions. family to a mutual and more accurate understanding
of what is wrong
Guarded families • This he achieves through a series of partial
Some families put on a guarded façade and refuse to interventions, which include.
challenge each other in the session. By being neutral and • Counteracting inappropriate denials, conflicts
nonjudgmental, sometimes, the therapist can perpetuate • Lifting hidden intrapersonal conflict to the level
this guarded façade put forth by families. Hence, therapists of interpersonal interaction.
must be able to read this and try to challenge them, listen 3. The therapist fulfills in part the role of true parent
to microchallenges within the family, must be ready to move figure, a controller of danger, and a source of emotional
in and out from one family member to another, without support and satisfaction‑supplying elements that the
fixing to one member. family needs but lacks. He introduces more appropriate
attitudes, emotions, and images of family relations than
Communicating with the therapist outside sessions the family has ever had
Many families attempt to reduce tension by communicating 4. The therapist works toward penetrating (entering into)
with therapist outside the session, and beginning therapist and undermining resistances and reducing the intensity
are particularly susceptible for such ploys. The family or of shared currents of conflict, guilt, and fear. He
a member/s may want to meet the therapist outside the accomplishes these aims mainly using confrontation
sessions by trying to influence the therapist to their views and interpretation
and opinions. Therapists must refrain from such encounters 5. The therapist serves as a personal instrument of reality
and suggest discussing these issues openly during the testing for the family.
sessions. Of course, rarely, there may be sensitive or very
personal information that one may want to discuss in In carrying out these functions, the family therapist plays a
person that may be permissible. wide range of roles, as:
Table 2: Guidelines for conducting interventions with modality of therapy is contracted with the family, and
families the therapy is put into force. The frequency and intensity
Timings for appointments to be followed for smooth conduct of sessions of sessions are determined by the degree of distress felt
Arriving late may reduce actual session time by the same margin by the family and the geographical distance from the
Any cancellation or postponement of sessions to be informed in advance by therapy center, i.e., families may be seen as inpatients
both parties at the center if they are in crisis or if they live far away.
Session location would be intimated in advance
An approximate total number of expected family sessions to be informed in
the beginning; including frequency of the sessions The Family Psychiatry Center at The NIMHANS, Bengaluru,
Inform clients about the reason why the family is being seen together Karnataka, India, is one of the centers where formal
Advise clients that changes may occur gradually after assessments and training in therapy is regularly conducted. An outline of the
immediate solutions may not be provided as far as possible
Family Assessment Proforma[5] used at this center is given
The duration of the sessions would be informed in the beginning itself
(45 min to an hour) in Figure 1. Several other structured family assessment
Any other matters arising, in the end, can brought up during subsequent instruments are available [Figure 1].
sessions
During sessions, clients to refrain from interrupting when someone else is Middle phase of therapy
talking
This phase of therapy forms the major work that is carried
Family members to wait for turns to talk as everyone would be given the
opportunity out with the family. Depending on the school of therapy, that
Clients to avoid verbal arguments or fights during the sessions is used, these sessions may number from a few (strategic) to
Inform clients about the confidentiality of the contents of the sessions and many sessions lasting many months (psychodynamic). The
record‑keeping practices techniques employed depend on the understanding of the
Clients to avoid any discussions outside of therapy sessions with the
family during the assessment as much as the family – therapist
therapist
Clients to discuss relevant matters as far as possible in the sessions even fit. For example, the degree of psychological sophistication
though some matters may be conflicting in nature of the clients will determine the use of psychodynamic
Make a formal contract with the family about roles of therapist and the and behavioral techniques. Similarly, a therapist who is
family members comfortable with structural/strategic methods would put
In families with violence, a no‑violence contract is preferable during the
entire process of family therapy
these therapies to maximum use. The nature of the disorder
and the degree of pathology may also determine the choice
of therapy, i.e., behavioral techniques may be used more
that a family formulation is generated, hypothesized in chronic psychotic conditions while the more difficult or
and analyzed. This leads to a comprehensive systemic resistant families may get brief strategic therapies. We will
formulation involving three generations. This now describe some of the important techniques used with
formulation will determine which family members we different kinds of problems.
need to see in a therapy, what interventional techniques
we should use and what changes in relationships we Psychodynamic therapy
should effect. The team will also discuss the minimum, This school was one of the first to be described by people like
most effective treatment plan which emerges Ackerman and Bowen.[1,6] This method has been made more
considering the most feasible changes the family can contextual and briefer by therapists like Boszormenyi‑Nasgy
make and Framo.[7,8] Essentially, the therapist understands the
vi. Formal Contract: A brief understanding of the family dynamics employed by different members of the family and
homeostasis is presented to the family. Sometimes, the the interrelationships of these members. These family ego
full hypothesis may be fed to the family in a noncritical defenses are interpreted to the members and the goal of
and positive way (“Positive Connotation”), appreciating therapy is to effects emotional insight and working through
the way in which the system is functioning the therapist of new defense patterns. Family transferences may become
presents the treatment plat to the family and negotiates evident and may need interpretation. Therapy usually lasts
with the members the plan and action they would like from 15 to 30 sessions and this method may be employed
to take up at the present time. The time frame and in persons who are psychologically sophisticated, and able
• Facilitate them grieving inevitable losses–of function, The goal is to disrupt the interactional patterns that
of dreams, of life reinforce the disorder.
• Increase productive collaboration among patients,
families, and the health‑care team To assist family members in using exposure, reward,
• Trace prior family experience with the illness through relaxation, and response prevention techniques to reduce
constructing a genogram the patients’ anxieties.
• Set individual and family goals related to illness and to
nonillness developmental events. Eating disorders
Target the dysfunctional family processes, namely,
Schizophrenia enmeshment and overprotectiveness.
Family EE and communication deviance (or lack of clarity
and structure in communication) are well‑established risk To help parents build effective and developmentally
factors for the onset of schizophrenia. appropriate strategies for promoting and monitoring their
child’s eating behaviors.
Psychoeducational interventions aim to increase family
members’ understanding of the disorder and their Childhood disorders
ability to manage the positive and negative symptoms of The primary focus is the development of effective parenting
psychosis. and contingency management strategies that will disrupt
the problematic family interactions associated with ADHD
Simple strategies would include reduction of adverse and ODD.
family atmosphere by reducing stress and burden on
Family‑based interventions for autism spectrum disorder
relatives, reduction of expressions of anger and guilt by the
Parents taught to use communication and social training
family, helping relatives to anticipate and solve problems,
tools that are adapted to the needs of their children and
maintenance of reasonable expectations for patient
apply these techniques to their family interactions at
performance, to set appropriate limits whilst maintaining
home.
some degree of separation when needed; and changing
relatives’ behavior and belief systems.
Substance misuse
Enhance the coping ability of family members and reduce
Programs emphasize family resilience. Address families’
the negative consequences of alcohol and drug abuse
need for education, crisis intervention, skills training, and
on concerned relatives; eliminate the family factors that
emotional support. constitute barriers to treatment; use family support to
engage and retain the drug and/or alcohol user in therapy;
Bipolar mood disorder change the characteristics of the family environment that
To recognize the early signs and symptoms of bipolar contribute to relapse Al‑Anon, AL‑teen.
disorder.
Termination phase
Develop strategies for intervening early with new episodes This last phase of therapy is finished in a couple of
and assure consistency with medication regimens. sessions. The initial goals of therapy are reviewed
with the family. The family and the therapist review
Manage moodiness and swings of the patient, anger together the goals which were achieved, and the therapist
management, feelings of frustration. reminds the family the new patterns/changes which have
emerged. The need to continue these new patterns is
Depression emphasized. At the same time, the family is cautioned that
Family conflict and rejection, low family support, ineffective these new patterns will occur when all members make a
communication, poor expression of affect, abuse, and concerted effort to see this happen. Family members are
insecure attachment bonds are primary focus of family reminded that it is easy to fall back to the old patterns of
therapy associated with depression cognitive‑behavioral functioning which had produced the unstable equilibrium
and interpersonal interventions for depression. necessitating consultation.
by the family. This way the family has a better chance of the techniques for therapy are drawn from different
sustaining the change created. Sometimes booster sessions schools namely the structural, strategic, and behavioral
are also advised after 6–12 months especially for outstation psychodynamic therapies.
families who cannot come regularly for follow‑ups. These
booster sessions will review the progress and negotiate APPENDIX: Glossary of terms
further changes with the family over a couple of sessions. Structure
This follow‑up period, after therapy is terminated is The repetitive patterns of interaction that organize the way
crucial for working through process and ensures that the in which family members relate and interact with each other.
client‑therapist bond is not severed too quickly. It is easy
to deal with the clients’ and therapist’ anxieties if this Boundaries
transition phase is smooth. Boundaries are the rules defining who participates in the
system and how, i.e., the degree of access outsiders have
SPECIAL SOCIOCULTURAL ISSUES IN THERAPY to the system.
SPECIFIC TO INDIA
Subsystem
Most Indian families are functionally joint families though It may comprise of a single person, or several persons joined
they may have a nuclear family structure. Furthermore, together by common membership criteria, for example,
unlike the Western world more than two generations age, gender, or shared purpose.
readily come for therapy. Hence, it becomes necessary to
deal with two to three generations in therapy and also Coalition
with transgenerational issues. Our families also foster When alignments stand in opposition to another part of
dependency and interdependency rather than autonomy. the system (i.e., when several family members are against
This issue must also be kept in mind when dealing with another member/s.
parent–child issues. Indians have a varied cultural and
religious diversity depending on the region from which Alliance
the family comes. The therapist has to be familiar with the The joining together of two or more members. It popularly
regional customs, practices, beliefs, and rituals. The Indian designates appositive affinity between two units of a
family therapist has to also be wary of being too directive in system.
therapy as our families may give the mantle of omnipotence
to the therapist and it may be more difficult for us to Channels of communication are a mechanism that defines
adopt at one‑down or nondirective approach. Hence, while “who speaks to whom.” When channels of communication
systemic family therapy is eminently possible in India one are blocked, needs cannot be fulfilled, problems cannot be
must keep in mind these sociocultural factors so as to get a solved, and goals cannot be achieved.
good “family‑therapist fit.”
Enmeshed families
Constraint factors in therapy In which, there is extreme sensitivity among the individual
The economic backwardness of most out families makes members to each other and their primary subsystem.
therapy feasible and affordable, in terms of time and money
spent, only to the middle and upper classes of our society. Financial support and sponsorship
The poorer families usually drop out of therapy as they have Nil.
other more pressing priorities. The lack of tertiary social
support and welfare or social security makes it less possible Conflicts of interest
to network with other systems. We are also woefully There are no conflicts of interest.
inadequate in terms of trained family therapists to cater to
our large population. In our country, distances seem rather REFERENCES
daunting and modes of transport and communication are
poor for families to readily seek out a therapist. We work 1. Ackerman NW. Treating the Troubled Family. New York: Basic Books;
1966.
with these constraint factors and so the “family‑therapy” 2. Vidyasagar. Innovations in Psychiatric Treatment at Amritsar Mental
fit is an important factor for families that are seeking and Hospital. Report on a Seminar on the Organization and Future Needs of
Mental Health Services. Vol. 19. New Delhi; World Health Organization,
staying in family therapy. SEA; 1971.
3. Duval E. Family Development. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1967.
CONCLUSIONS 4. Unbarger C. Structural Family Therapy. Now York: Grune and Stratton;
1983.
5. Family Psychiatry Center, National Institute of Mental Health and
Over the last few years, a systemic model has evolved for Neurosciences. Family Assessment Proforma. Bengaluru: Family
Psychiatry Center, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences;
service and for training. The model uses a predominantly 2001.
systematic framework for understanding families and 6. Bowen M. The use of family theory in clinical practice. In: Haley J, editor.
Changing Families. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1971. London: Hutchinson; 1988.
7. Boszormenyi‑Nasgy I. Contextual therapy: Therapeutic leverages in 13. Palazzoli Selvini M, Boscolo L, Cecehin G. Hypothesizing‑ Circularity
mobilizing Trust. In: Green RJ, Framo JL, editors. Family Therapy: Major Neutrality: Three Guidelines for the Conductor of the Session. Vol. 19.
Contributions. New York: International University Press, Inc.; 1984. Family Process; 1980. p. 3‑12.
8. Framo JL. Family of Origin as a Therapeutic Resource for Adults in Marital 14. Tomm K. One prespective on the Milan systemic approach. Part 11.
and Family Therapy. Year Care Seminar‑Family Therapy. Cambridge;1985. Description of session format. Interviewing style and interventions.
p. 151‑9. J Marital Fam Ther 1984;10:253‑71.
9. Fallon IR, Boyd JL, McGill CW. Family Care of Schizophrenia. New York: 15. Erikson M. Indirect hypnotherapy of a bedwetting couple. In: Haley J,
Gillford Press; 1984. editor. Changing Families. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1971.
10. Anderson CM, Reiss DJ, Hogarty GE. Schizophrenia in the family? A 16. Watzlawick P, Weakland J, Fisch R. Change: Principles of Problems
Practitioners Guide to Psychoeducation and Management. New York: Formation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W. Norten; 1974.
Guilkd Ford Press; 1986. 17. Varghese M, Bhatti RS, Rahguram A, Chandra PS, Udaya Kumar GS,
11. Minuchin S. Families and Family Therapy. London: Tavistock Publications; Shah A. Training in family therapy at NIMHANS. In: Kapur M, Sharma
1974. Sunder C, Bhatti RS, editors. Psychotherapy Training In India. Vol. 36.
12. Fishman HC. Treating Troubled Adolescents – A Family Therapy Approach. NIMHANS Publication; 2001. p. 112‑5.