Untitled
Untitled
Variable Conductance Heat Pipe Radiators for Lunar and Martian Environments
AIP Conf. Proc. 1103, 57 (2009); 10.1063/1.3115568
Experimental and numerical investigations of axisymmetric wave propagation in cylindrical pipe filled with fluid
J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 3209 (2003); 10.1121/1.1570432
Thermal convection below a conducting lid of variable extent: Heat flow scalings and two-dimensional, infinite
Prandtl number numerical simulations
Phys. Fluids 15, 455 (2003); 10.1063/1.1533755
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: [Link] Downloaded to IP:
[Link] On: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 [Link]
Numerical Investigation of CO2 Emission and Thermal
Stability of a Convective and Radiative Stockpile of Reactive
Material in a Cylindrical Pipe of Variable Thermal
Conductivity
Department of Mathematics, Vaal University of Technology, Private Bag X021, Vanderbijlpark, 1911, South Africa.
Abstract. In this paper the CO2 emission and thermal stability in a long cylindrical pipe of combustible reactive material
with variable thermal conductivity are investigated. It is assumed that the cylindrical pipe loses heat by both convection
and radiation at the surface. The nonlinear differential equations governing the problem are tackled numerically using
Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method coupled with shooting technique method. The effects of various thermophysical
parameters on the temperature and carbon dioxide fields, together with critical conditions for thermal ignition are
illustrated and discussed quantitatively.
INTRODUCTION
CO2 emission coupled with internal heating generation occurs in processes of spontaneous ignition in stock piles
of industrial waste fuel, coal, hays and wool wastes [1]. Heat generated from such combustible materials due to
exothermic chemical reactions has a wide range of applications in processes such as heavy oil recovery, incineration
of waste material, storage of cellulose material, combustion of solids, pyrolysis of biomass and coal, and also in
design of internal combustion engines and automobile exhaust systems [2].
An investigation of CO2 emission is of importance because about 80% of CO2 emitted contributing to the
Greenhouse effect may be due to exothermic chemical reactions in stockpiles of reactive combustible materials [3].
The study of thermal stability is also of interest since the heat generated due to exothermic chemical reaction may
exceed the heat loss to the surrounding environment, and this may lead to thermal instability and explosion [4, 5, 6,
7].
It is necessary to numerically investigate how the emission of CO2 and heat generation in such stock piles of
combustible materials can be controlled. To do so, a mathematical model has been designed to cater for both thermal
stability and CO2 emission control systems [8]. It is necessary to model this phenomenon mathematically in order to
achieve reliable design of thermal systems that are of importance in issues related to safety and hazard assessment
[9, 10].
The mathematical model is also important to design CO2 emission control systems. Some Knowledge of
phenomena that help to control CO2 emission is of importance in preservation of O2 that is essential for life. The
complicated chemistry involved in combustion of reactive material in a stockpile is tackled by considering one-step
decomposition kinetics [11, 12, 13]. The combustion reaction due to exothermic chemical reaction in a stockpile of
combustible reactive material is very complicated and includes many radicals, especially when large hydorcarbons
are involved [14]. The complicated processes of these exothermic reactions result with nonlinear interactions of
short lived reacting species. These interactions ultimately bring about reactants, products and temperature gradients
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
A long cylindrical pipe of combustible reactive material with variable thermal conductivity݇, and surface
emissivityߝ is considered. It is assumed that the reactive cylinder is undergoing an nth order oxidation chemical
reaction and that it is subjected to convection and radiation. A one-step finite rate irreversible chemical kinetics
mechanism between the material and the oxygen of the air is assumed and it is expressed by the following complete
combustion formula:
݆ ݆
ܥ ൬݅ ൰ ଶ ՜ ݅ଶ ൬ ൰ ଶ
Ͷ ʹ
The heat loss due to radiation at the cylindrical pipe surface to the surrounding environment is represented by
Stefan-Boltzmann’s law equation as ݍൌ ߝߪሺܶ ସ െ ܶஶସ ሻ. Convective heat loss at the surface of the cylinder follows
Newton’s law of cooling and it is generally indicated by the following expression: െ ሾܶ െ ܶஶ ሿǤ The figure below
illustrates the geometry of the problem.
Following [1, 2, 9, 12, 19] the governing nonlinear ordinary differential equations for the heat and mass transfer
phenomena in the presence of convection, radiation, O2 depletion and CO2 emission are respectively expressed as
follows:
ௗ ௗ் ் ିா
ቀݎҧ ቁ ܳ ቀ ቁ ܥ ݁ ݔቀ ቁ െ ߝߪሺܶ ସ െ ܶஶସ ሻ ൌ Ͳ (1)
ҧ ௗҧ ௗҧ ௩ ோ்
ௗ ௗ ் ିா
ቀݎҧ ቁ െ ܳ ቀ ቁ ݔ݁ ܥቀ ቁ ൌ Ͳǡ
(2)
ҧ ௗҧ ௗҧ ௩ ோ்
ఊ ௗ ௗ ் ିா
ቀݎҧ ቁ ܳ ቀ ቁ ܥ ݁ ݔቀ ቁ ൌ Ͳǡ (3)
ҧ ௗҧ ௗҧ ௩ ோ்
with symmetric boundary conditions at the center and at the surface of the reactive solid cylinder respectively as:
ௗ் ௗ ௗ
ൌ ൌ ൌ Ͳǡ ሺݎҧ ൌ Ͳሻ (4)
ௗҧ ௗҧ ௗҧ
ௗ் భ ௗ మ
ൌെ ሺܶ െ ܶஶ ሻǡ ൌെ ሺܲ െ ܲஶ ሻǡ ܥൌ ܥ௪ ǡ ሺݎҧ ൌ ܽሻ (5)
ௗҧ ௗҧ ఊ
In this case ܶ is the cylinder’s absolute temperature and ܥis the O2 concentration. The term ܲ is the CO2
emission concentration while ܶஶ is the ambient temperature and ܥ௪ is the O2 concentration at the cylinder surface.
The CO2 concentration at the cylinder surface is denoted by ܲஶ , ݇ is the variable thermal conductivity of the
reacting cylinder, and according to Makinde [2], Lacey and Wake [19] the thermal conductivity of the reactive
material is temperature dependent and it is expressed as
ଵ ௗ ௗఏ ௗఏ ଶ
ቀݎ ቁ ߣ ߚ ቀ ቁ ሺͳ ߤߠሻ Ȱ ቀ ቁ ߠ݁ ିఒఉఏ ൨ െ ܴܽሾሺߤߠ ͳሻସ െ ͳሿ ൌ Ͳǡ (8)
ௗ ௗ ௗ ଵାఓఏ
ଵ ௗ ௗ
ቀݎ ቁ െ ߣȾଵ ሺͳ ߤߠሻ Ȱ ቀ ቁ ൌ Ͳǡ (9)
ௗ ௗ ଵାఓఏ
ଵ ௗ ௗஏ
ቀݎ ቁ ߣȾଶ ሺͳ ߤߠሻ Ȱ ቀ ቁ ൌ Ͳǡ (10)
ௗ ௗ ଵାఓఏ
ௗఏ ௗ ௗஏ
ൌ ൌ ൌ Ͳǡ (11)
ௗ ௗ ௗ
ௗఏ ௗஏ
ൌ െଵ ߠ݁ ିఒఉఏ ǡ ൌ െଶ ȲǡȰ ൌ ͳǤ (12)
ௗ ௗ
The symbol ߣ is the Frank-Kamenetskii parameter, ߤ is the activation energy parameter. O2 consumption rate
parameter is represented by Ⱦଵ withȾଶ being the CO2 emission rate parameter. Bi1 is the thermal Biot number, Bi2
is the CO2 Biot number and Ra is the radiation parameter. ߚ is the parameter that represents the ratio of
temperature-dependent thermal conductivity to production of heat and ݎis the dimensionless radial distance. The
dimensionless heat transfer rate, Nusselt number, and the dimensionless mass transfer rates for both O2 and CO2,
Sherwood numbers, at the cylinder surface, are respectively expressed as follows:
ௗఏ ௗ ௗஏ
ܰ ݑൌ െ ሺͳሻǡ ݄ܵଵ ൌ ሺͳሻǡ ݄ܵଶ ൌ െ ሺͳሻ. (13)
ௗ௬ ௗ௬ ௗ௬
Equations (8)-(10) and the boundary conditions (11)-(12) were solved numerically using the RKF45 method
coupled with shooting technique [20, 21]. The Nusselt and the Sherwood numbers in equations (13) were also
worked out and their numerical values are provided in table 1. Their graphical solutions are also provided.
ݔԢଵ ൌ ݔଶ
ଵ ௫భ
ݔᇱ ଶ ൌ െ ݔଶ െ ߣ ቂߚሺݔଶ ሻଶ ሺͳ ߤݔଵ ሻ ሺݔଷ ሻ ቀ ቁ ݔଵ ݁ ିఒఉ௫భ ቃ ܴܽሾሺߤݔଵ ͳሻସ െ ͳሿ
ଵାఓ௫భ
ݔԢଷ ൌ ݔସ
ଵ ௫భ
ݔԢସ ൌ െ ݔସ ߣȾଵ ሺͳ ߤݔଵ ሻ ሺݔଷ ሻ ቀ ቁ
ଵାఓ௫భ
ݔԢହ ൌ ݔ
ଵ ௫భ
ݔԢ ൌ െ ݔହ െ ߣȾଶ ሺͳ ߤݔଵ ሻ ሺݔଷ ሻ ቀ ቁǤ (14)
ଵାఓ௫భ
ݔԢଵ ሺͲሻ ൌ ݔԢଷ ሺͲሻ ൌ ݔԢହ ሺͲሻ ൌ Ͳǡ ݔԢଵ ሺͳሻ ൌ െଵ ݔଵ ݁ ିఒఉ௫భ ǡ ݔଷ ሺͳሻ ൌ ͳǡ ݔԢହ ሺͳሻ ൌ െଶ ݔହ Ǥ (15)
Figure 10. O2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 11. O2 profile: ߣ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 12. O2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ߣ ൌ
ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ
ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ
Figure 17. CO2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 18. CO2 profile: ߣ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 19. CO2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ߣ ൌ
ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ߣ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ
ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ
Figure 23. CO2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 24. CO2 profile: ݊ ൌ ͳǡ ݉ ൌ Figure 25. CO2 profile: ݊ ൌ
ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͳǡ ݉ ൌ ͲǤͷǡ ܴܽ ൌ ͳǡ ߤ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦ ൌ
ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳǡ ߣ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ߣ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ଶ ൌ ͳ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଵ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ Ⱦଶ ൌ ͲǤͳǡ ߣ ൌ
ͲǤͳǡ ଵ ൌ ͳ
In this case ߣǡ Frank-Kamenetskii parameter which is also known as the variation rate of reaction, is studied
against the dimensionless heat transfer rate at the slab surface, Nusselt number Nu, for various values of some
parameters as shown by the figures plotted. The results obtained for the Nusselt number are relatively the same for
Sherwood numbers. Numerical results are indicated in table 1, where β 1 = β2 = 0.1.
The numerical values for the Nusselt number, Nu, for each parameter indicated versus the reaction rate or Frank-
Kamenetskii parameter ߣ are illustrated graphically as indicated by figures 26 – 31. From figures 26 – 30 it is seen
that the thermal stability is attained as the parameters Ra, n, P, ଵ and ߚ are increased. Thermal stability is indicated
by the longest graph with the highest value of ߣǤ A different scenario is observed from figure 31 where Nu decreases
with increasing m and that thermal stability is attained by keeping low values of m.
Ra n P ଵ ଶ ߚ m Nu λc
Figure 26. Effect of increasing Ra on Figure 27. Effect of increasing n on Figure 28. Effect of increasing ߤ
cylinder thermal criticality values cylinder thermal criticality values on cylinder thermal criticality
values
Figure 29. Effect of increasing ଵ on Figure 30. Effect of increasing Ⱦ on Figure 31. Effect of increasing ݉ on
cylinder thermal criticality values cylinder thermal criticality values cylinder thermal criticality values
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to thank Vaal University of Technology for financial support and the ICFAS2014
publication committee.
REFERENCES
1. O. D. Makinde, Mechanics Research Communications 32, 191-195 (2005).
2. O. D. Makinde, Journal of Energetic Materials 38, 283-298 (2012).
3. O. D. Makinde, T. Chinyoka and R. S. Lebelo, Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2011, 216 (2011).
4. E. Balakrishnan, A. Swift and G. C. Wake, Math. Comput. Modell 24, 1-10 (1996).
5. G. [Link], J. B. Bell and W. Y. Crutchfield, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA,
1998) Vol. 95, pp. 13384–13386.
6. T. Boddington, P. Gray and G. C. Wake, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (UK, 1977), Vol. 357,
pp. 403–422.
7. K. S. Adegbie, in African Mathematical Union and Springer-Verlag, 2011 (private communication).
8. D. A. Frank-Kamenetskii, “Diffusion and heat transfer in chemical kinetics,” Plenum Press, New York, 1969.
9. F. Alhama and A. Campo, International Communications in Heat and Mass transfer 28, 127-137 (2001).
10. O. D. Makinde, Journal of the Franklin Institute 349, 957-965 (2012).
11. F. A. Williams, Combustion Theory (Benjamin & Cuminy, California, 1985).
12. O. D. Makinde, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 31, 1227-1231, 2004.
13. A. M. K. Legodi and O. D. Makinde, International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6, 2541-2549 (2011).
14. S. Liao, J. Su and A. T. Chwang, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49, 2437-2445 (2006).
15. M. A. Sadiq and J. H. Merkin, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 20, 27-46 (1994).
16. J. M. Simmie, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 29, 599-634 (2003).
17. O.D. Makinde and P.Y. Mhone, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 53, 128-136 (2007).
18. O.D. Makinde, Journal of Applied Mechanics 76, 1-5 (2009).
19. A. Lacey and G. C. Wake, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics 26, 23-39 (1982).
20. J. H. Mathews, Numerical Methods: for Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics (Prentice-Hall
International, Inc. USA, 1987).
21. D.B. Meade, B.S. Haran and R.E. White, Maple Tech. 3, 85-93 (1996).