0% found this document useful (0 votes)
200 views3 pages

Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric

The document provides a rubric for assessing oral presentations. It rates presentations on a scale of 1 to 4 in five criteria: organization, content, elocution, visuals, and non-verbal expression. A score of 1 is poor, 2 is regular, 3 is good, and 4 is excellent. Based on the rubric, a presentation that received a total score of 1 would be disorganized with no knowledge or ability to answer questions, have poor pronunciation and lack of interest, be difficult to read with many errors, and involve no eye contact.

Uploaded by

Tamara Pillancar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
200 views3 pages

Oral Presentation Evaluation Rubric

The document provides a rubric for assessing oral presentations. It rates presentations on a scale of 1 to 4 in five criteria: organization, content, elocution, visuals, and non-verbal expression. A score of 1 is poor, 2 is regular, 3 is good, and 4 is excellent. Based on the rubric, a presentation that received a total score of 1 would be disorganized with no knowledge or ability to answer questions, have poor pronunciation and lack of interest, be difficult to read with many errors, and involve no eye contact.

Uploaded by

Tamara Pillancar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Criteria Organization Content Elocution Visual Non-verbal Total score

expression
Poor Disorganized; the Show no Voice is too low. The font is too The student reads
1 information does knowledge and Too many words small. Did not use all the time and
not have a logical cannot answer are pronounced graphics. Have does not keep eye
order. questions. incorrectly. Shows too many spelling contact.
lack of interest. errors.
Regular A little organized, The student has Sometimes The font is small. The student reads
2 but it is difficult to little knowledge cannot be heard Uses irrelevant half of the time
follow the of the subject and well. Some words graphics. Have and keeps little
presentation can only answer are pronounced some spelling eye contact.
because the ideas basic questions. incorrectly. Shows errors.
are not well little enthusiasm.
interconnected.
Good Generally Presents enough Voice is adequate.
The font is The student
3 organized; almost information. Good appropriate. The keeps eye contact
all information is Answers all the pronunciation. graphics are most of the time,
presented in a questions, but Shows related to the but frequently
logical order. does not enthusiasm. presentation. Few reads from the
elaborate. spelling errors. notes.
Excellent Well organized; The student has Speaks clearly and The font is big The student
4 the information is full knowledge ofcorrectly. Shows and easy to read. keeps eye contact
presented in an the subject and high level of The graphics and the
easy to-follow, his/her answers enthusiasm and reinforce the presentation is
logical, and clear are detailed. confidence. presentation and conducted like a
manner. Generates increase audience dialogue.
interest in the understanding.
audience. No spelling errors.
ORAL PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

ORAL PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT RECORD (Total score: 20)


Student Organization Content Elocution Visuals Non-verbal Total Mark
expressions Score

ORAL PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT RECORD (Total score: 20)


Student Organization Content Elocution Visuals Non-verbal Total Mark
expressions Score

You might also like