FOAM SYSTEM PROTECTION
Eric S. Greenwald, P.E.
ERIC S. GREENWALD, P.E.
- B.S. Fire Protection Engineering University of
Maryland, 2001
- Licensed Professional Engineer in CA, CT, DE, MD, NJ,
NY, PA and VA
- Over 13 Years of fire protection experience with
expertise in fire sprinkler, suppression/clean agent,
fire alarm and foam system design and analysis,
hydraulics, fire pumps, code consulting, sales, project
management and commercial property, loss
prevention and underwriting.
- Foam fire protection experience, includes the sales,
design, installation and testing of over 6,00 gallons of
foam concentrate through a wide range of low
expansion and medium expansion systems. ANSUL,
certified in Foam system Design & Application.
- National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the
Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) and the
Hospital Engineering Society of Greater New York
(HESGNY). OSHA 30 Hour Training Certification in
Construction Health & Safety.
Overview & Objectives
- Types of Foam Agents and Foam System
Hardware
- Applications, Approvals, and Design
- Testing and Inspection
- Questions & Presentation Review
Introduction to Foam & Fuels
A B C D
Flammable Energized Combustible
Ordinary
Liquids Electrical Metals
Combustibles
Equipment
Wood
Gasoline Transformers Magnesium
Cloth
Acetone Computers Sodium
Paper
Kerosene Potassium
Wool
Alcohol
CLASS A FOAM CLASS B FOAM FOAM NOT RECOMMENDED
HYDROCARBONS
• Products of Crude Oil Float On Water.
– Gasoline
– Diesel
– Heptane
– Kerosene
POLAR SOLVENTS
• Products of Distillation Mix With Water.
– Ketones
– Ethanol
– Alcohols
– MTBE – Gasoline additive
(Methyl-tert-butyl ether)
Methods
Methodsof FireofExtinguishment for Fire
Fire Extinguishment
for Fighting Foams Foams
Fire Fighting
• removes heat at a faster rate than it is released
• separates the fuel from the oxidizing agent
• dilutes the vapor-phase concentration of the fuel and/or oxidizing agent below
that necessary for combustion
History of Foam
• Protein & Fluoroprotein, (for hydrocarbons), 1940’s
• AFFF (for hydrocarbons fuels), 1960’s
• AR-AFFF (multi-purpose), 1970’s
• High Expansion (total flooding capability)
• Class A (wetting agents), 1980’s
Protein / Fluoroprotein Foam
for hydrocarbons, 1940’s
Combination of crushed bone and
feather meal
Requires Aspiration
7 to 10 years Shelf-life
20OF to 120OF
Synthetic Foam
• Synthetic foams are based on synthetic surfactants. Synthetic foams
provide better flow and faster knockdown of flames.
• Aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) are water-based and frequently
contain hydrocarbon-based surfactant such as sodium alkyl sulfate, and
fluorosurfactant — such as fluorotelomers, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA),
or perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). They have the ability to spread
over the surface of hydrocarbon-based liquids.
• Alcohol-resistant aqueous film-forming foams (AR-AFFF) are foams
resistant to the action of alcohols, able to form a protective film when
they are present.
Foam Expansion Categories
• Low Expansion Foam Ratio: 8:1
• Medium Expansion Foam Ratio: 100:1
• High Expansion Foam Ratio: 500:1
• Compressed Air Foam Ratio: 10:1
AFFF- Aqueous Film Forming Foam
Low or Medium Expansion
for hydrocarbon fuels, 1960’s
Does not require aspiration, unlike
Proteins
Cannot be used on polar solvents
(i.e., alcohols, acetone, methanol)
Available in 1%, 3% or 6%
Storage temperature 35OF to 120OF
-freeze-protected available to -20OF
20 to 25 years Shelf-life
AR-AFFF Foams Alcohol Resistant- Aqueous Film
Forming Foam: Low or Medium Expansion
for polar solvent fuels, 1970’s
Multi-purpose foams created for both Polar-solvents (alcohols) & Hydrocarbons (fossil fuels).
-available in 3% or 6%
-does not require aspiration
-storage temperature 35OF to 120OF (optional freeze-protected available to -0O)
-20 to 25 year Shelf-life
High High Expansion Foam am
Detergent based foam effective on hydrocarbons only
-works by Cooling, Smothering, Penetrating and Insulating
-can be used for Local and Total Flooding applications
35OF to 120OF storage temperature range
20 year Shelf-life
Compressed Air Foam: Hybrid Low Expansion
for hydrocarbon or polar solvent fuels
Reasons to use CAF Systems:
• Water supply
• eliminate / reduce size of water tanks &
fire pumps
• Drainage / Containment
• eliminate / reduce size of drainage
systems and spill tanks, oil separators
CAF Technology
DESCRIPTION: Compressed Air Foam (CAF)
Lower design densities: TAR nozzles
4 TIMES LESS WATER
Class “A” Foam
(also referred to as Wetting agents)
For use on Ordinary Combustibles
-examples wood, cloth, paper
Reduces surface tension of water
-making water more effective minimizing water usage for
faster extinguishment
Optional formulation available to meet U.S. Forestry
Approval for Fixed Wing Aircraft and Helicopter
35OF to 120OF temperature storage range
20 to 25 years shelf-life
Foam Approvals
FM
Factory Mutual
UL MIL-SPEC
U.S. Department of Defense
Underwriters Laboratories Military Specifications
USCG & Many other Geographic Specific Approvals
Foam Terminology
Foam Terminology
FOAM • As Purchased from
CONCENTRATE: Manufacturer
FOAM • Concentrate
Proportioned with
SOLUTION: Water
• Air
Aspirated
FINISHED FOAM: Foam
Solution
Examples where Foam would be applicable to
Typical Applications and Design
Requirements
High-Rise Diesel Oil Storage & Generator Room
Flammable Liquid Storage & In-Rack Storage Room
Aircraft Hangar & Helicopter Landing Pad
Storage Tanks/ Containment area
Fuel Terminal Unloading Platform
Power Plant- Process/ Lubricating Oil Areas
Foam Systems
Bladder Tanks
Pump Systems
Fire Dos Water Driven Pump
Compressed Air Foam
Modified Venturi Device
Bladder Tanks
Typical System Arrangement
ADVANTAGES:
-Low cost vs. Pump Systems
-Wide flow range proportioning
-Simple operation
-Auxiliary power not required
DISADVANTAGES:
-Cannot refill during discharge
-Limited capacities
Bladder Tank Components
Balanced Pressure Proportioners
Designed to meet requirements of
NFPA for closed head foam water
sprinkler systems
-UL and FM Approved
Standard Proportioner Ranges:
2” = 30 - 300 gpm -Flow Range varies from 25 gpm to
2.5” = 35 - 400 gpm 3,000 gpm
3” = 70 - 800 gpm
-Multiple zones of varying flow rates
4” = 200 - 1,600 gpm can be supplied by one proportioner
6” = 300 - 3,400 gpm
8” = 500 - 5,500 gpm
Balanced Pressure Proportioner
Selection Min. Inlet Pressure vs. Flow
Typical Installation
-using variable range or standard proportioners
Typical Installation
-using variable range or standard proportioners (cont.)
Main & Reserve Bladder Tanks
NFPA 409 requirement
In-line Balanced Pressure Proportioning System
In-Line Balanced Pressure Proportioning System
ADVANTAGES
Low cost (>2000 gallons) (7571 L)
Wide flow range (Proportioners)
Can refill during system discharge
Variable pressure range
Proportioner(s) remotely located
DISADVANTAGES
Auxiliary power required
Additional maintenance required (Pump)
Uses a High Density Polyethylene Atmospheric Tank
In-Line Balanced Pressure Pump Proportioners
ILBP and FLOWMAX PPW Variable Range Proportioner
Benefits:
Eliminates the need for multiple ILBPs of
different sizes to accommodate a wide
range of flows
Simplifies design and installation of multi-
riser systems
• One proportioner in the header
versus one per riser
Proportioners can be remotely located • Only one concentrate line makes for
simple, clean installations
• Economical when replacing 2
or more ILBPs
Discharge Devices
Sprinklers
Nozzles
Monitors
Foam Chambers
Foam Makers
High Expansion Foam Generators
Air-Aspirated & Standard Sprinklers
Aspiration No Aspiration
Required for Protein Enough mechanical
Foams. energy for AFFF
applications but not
When used with suitable for protein
AFFF, foam becomes applications.
less mobile but have
a longer drain time.
Standard Heads
NFPA 11,16,30
Discharge Device & Foam Compatibility
Chapter 3
Monitors
Options:
Oscillating
Fixed
Self-Educting
Remote Control
Built-in Nozzles
Foam Maker
Fixed High Expansion Foam Generators
High Expansion
Outside Air Inside Air
Foam Chamber
System Design:
Determine the applicable NFPA code or Insurance
Company and select foam agent for application
• Class B
Flammable Liquids
– Polar Solvents, such as
Alcohol, Acetone??
– Hydrocarbon Fuels such as
Oil, Gasoline, Jet Fuel ??
– Review MSDS
NFPA Standards & FM Global Data Sheets
-typically used for design and installation of foam systems
• NFPA 11: Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam
• FM DS 4-03N Medium and High Expansion Foam Systems
• FM DS 4-07N Low Expansion Foam Systems
• NFPA 16: Standard for the Installation of Foam-Water Sprinkler Systems
• FM DS 4-12 Foam-Water Sprinkler Systems
• NFPA 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code
• NFPA 409: Standard on Aircraft Hangars
• NFPA 418: Standard on Helipad Protection
• NFPA 25: Inspection & Maintenance
New York City Code Process
Building Code & Fire Code City of New York
NFPA 13 & Building Code Appendix Q
NFPA 13 “Special Occupancy Hazards” Section Flammable &
Combustible Liquids
NFPA 30 “Protection of Flammable and Combustible Liquids
Code”
NFPA 11 “Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion
Foam” & NFPA 16 Standard for the Installation of Foam-Water
Sprinkler Systems
Low Expansion Foam Water
Sprinkler System Calculation
Bladder Tank Sizing Calculation
Q(FOAM Qty in Gal) = Q (SPRINKLER FLOW IN
GPM) X FOAM CONC. % X DURATION (MIN)
Low Expansion Foam Sprinkler
System Design Example
• Diesel Storage Room in a NYC High-Rise.
• Room Dimensions 40 FT (L) x 40 FT (W) x 10 FT
(H)
• ANSULITE 3% AFFF, TYCO TY3131 UPRIGHT
K5.6 SPRINKLER
• BLADDER TANK AND BALANCED PRESSURE
PROPORTIONER
Low Expansion Foam Sprinkler
System Design Example (Cont.)
• Minimum Density per Tyco Datasheet for 3%
AFFF for Tyco TY3131 for Hydrocarbon fuel
and NFPA 16 is 0.16 gpm/sqft for 10 Minute
Duration.
• Room Area 40 FT (L) x 40 FT (W) = 1,600 sqft
• Q(Foam) = Q(0.16 x 1,600sqft) x 0.03 x 10 min
• Q(Foam) = 76.8 gallons of Ansulite AFFF 3%
NFPA 25- Testing & Maintenance
SCOPE
This document establishes the minimum
requirements for periodic inspection, testing, and
maintenance of water-based fire protection
systems.
Contains requirements for Foam-Water Sprinkler
Systems.
Foam Solution Concentration Testing
Conductivity vs. Refractive Index
• Conductivity and Refractive Index are two accepted
methods that compare collected foam solution to
premeasured samples to determine foam solution
concentration. NFPA 11 allows an acceptable range
for the sample to test at the rated concentration and
up to 30% above the rated concentration.
• Conductivity uses an electric meter to measure the
ability of the foam solution to conduct current.
• Refractive Index uses a handheld refractometer to
determine the refractive index of the foam sample.
Presentation Review
• Q. Primarily, what type of fire/hazard is foam
ideal to protect against?
• Q. What are the three components needed to
create fire protection foam?
• Q. What are the three expansion categories of
foam?
• Q. What does AFFF stand for?
• Q. How does foam suppress a fire?
• Q. Should standard 3% AFFF foam concentrate be
used to protect against an Isopropyl Alcohol fire?
QUESTIONS?
Resources
• Ansul
Tyco Fire Protection Products
One Stanton Street
Marinette, WI 54143-2542
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_fighting_foam