The Employees' Provident Funds and (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1952
The Employees' Provident Funds and (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1952
The
Employees' Provident Funds and [Miscellaneous
Provisions] Act, 19521
(Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952)
CONTENTS
2. Definitions
3. Power to apply Act to an establishment which has a common provident fund with
another establishment
5-DD. Acts and proceedings of the Central Board or its Executive Committee or the
State Board not to be invalidated on certain grounds
5-E. Delegation
7. Modification of Scheme
7-D. Tribunal
7-F. Resignation
7-G. Salary and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Presiding
Officer
7-K. Right of appellant to take assistance of legal practitioner and of Government, etc.,
to appoint presenting officers
13. Inspectors
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 3 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Penalties
SCHEDULE I
SCHEDULE II
SCHEDULE III
SCHEDULE IV
APPENDIX
———
section (1) of Section 16, where it appears to the Central Provident Fund
Commissioner, whether on an application made to him in this behalf or otherwise, that
the employer and the majority of employees in relation to any establishment have
agreed that the provisions of this Act should be made applicable to the establishment,
he may, by notification in the Official Gazette, apply the provisions of this Act to that
establishment on and from the date of such agreement or from any subsequent date
specified in such agreement.]
14
[(5) An establishment to which this Act applies shall continue to be governed by
this Act notwithstanding that the number of persons employed therein at any time
falls below twenty.
15 [* * *]]
Assn. v. Union of India, (1991) 3 SCC 119 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 822; Mantu Biri Factory (P) Ltd. v.
R.P.F. Commr., CA No. 6 of 1993 decided on 8-3-1994 (Cal).
An establishment falling under Section 1(3)(a) would be covered by the Act w.e.f. the date of
commencing manufacturing process and not from any earlier date on which it had engaged itself in
purchase and sale of goods. Sigon Tools and Plastics (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1993 Lab IC
2350 : (1994) 2 LLN 865 : (1994) 1 LLJ 983 (Bom).
Act is applicable to the area of the Khasi Hills Autonomous District and the notice issued under
Section 7-A of the Act is applicable to the Respondent. R.P.F. Commr. v. Shillong City Bus
Syndicate, (1996) 8 SCC 741 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 1109.
Act not applicable to Vishwa Bharati University as well as to its various departments. Vishwa
Bharati v. R.P.F. Commr., 1983 Lab IC 38 (Cal HC) : (1983) 1 LLJ 332.
The activities carried on by appellant pertaining to equipment leasing and merchant banking are
intimately connected with ‘goods’ and appellant is commercial if not trading establishment it cannot
be said that said activities would fall outside the scope of said notification dated 7-3-1962 for
covering of ‘trading and commercial’ establishment to be covered under the Act. Canbank Financial
Services Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1997) 3 LLN 575 : (1997) 2 CLR 734 (Karn)(DB).
The plea that an institution is charitable, is not relevant to determination of applicability of the Act
to such an institution. Venkataramana Dispensary v. Union of India, (1986) 2 LLN 942 (Mad) :
(1986) 2 LLJ 411.
As all the three schools viz. Nursery, Primary and High School function under same
management, there is functional integrity between them. Merely because closure of one will not
affect the other has no relevance and cannot be a criterion that the three schools are separate. As
the number of employees in the three schools together exceeeds 20, the Act is applicable. S.N.G.
English Medium School v. R.P.F. Commr., (1997) 3 LLN 585 (Karn).
Appellant contested the applicability of the Act to Jabalpur branch for a long period but ultimately
conceded its applicability when the matter came up before Supreme Court. In the peculiar
circumstances of the case, the appeal although dismissed, the Act directed to be applied the branch
in question only prospectively. Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad v. Union of India, (1999) 6
SCC 38 : 1999 SCC (L&S) 1046.
It is not spelt out from the Preamble or Section 1(3)(b) that the notification can be issued only
with respect to establishments which are similar to factories. Central Government has power to issue
notification under Section 1(3)(b) regarding hospitals and make the Act applicable to them.
Christian Medical College & Brown Memorial Hospital, Ludhiana v. R.P.F. Commr., 1982 Lab IC
952 (P&H HC).
When the establishment as covered under the Act is closed down on 7-9-1988 and the last
employee left 21-4-1989, the provisions of the Act would cease to apply to the establishment after 21
-4-1989. Also in the absence of employees and no wages being paid, the provision under the Act
will be applicable. Purex Laboratories India (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1998) 1 CLR 295 (Kar).
Where a factory, the addition whereof had brought the establishment within the purview of the
Act, was permanently closed down but the services of one of the employees were retained, such an
employee was entitled to the benefits of the Act. Venkatesh v. Union of India, (1987) 2 LLJ 450
(Bom)(DB).
Where an establishment to which the Act applied, was divided among the partners, the Act would
continue to apply to the part of each ex-partner even if the number of persons employed in each
part is less than 20. R.P.F. Commr. v. Ratna Enterprises, (1986) 1 LLN 857 (Kant)(DB) : (1986) 2
LLJ 137 : (1986) 68 FJR 277.
► Establishment, what is.—Solicitors' firm, held, is an ‘establishment’. M.C. Poddar v. R.P.F.
Commr., (1971) 1 LLJ 381 (Cal) : 1971 Lab IC 359 : 22 FLR 388.
A registered firm, undertaking job work in Government warehouses as an Excise Contractor, is
an ‘establishment’. Central India Excise Traders v. R.P.F. Commr., (1992) 1 LLJ 498 (MP)(DB).
Where establishments of engineers and engineering contractors exclusively engaged in building
and construction industry were exempted from the Act by a notification issued under Section 1(3)
(b), a workshop run by such an establishment for maintaining and repairing equipment essential for
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 8 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
carrying on building and construction business is also entitled to exemption under the notification.
Such a workshop is not a separate establishment. [Cemindia Co. Ltd. v. Bachubhai N. Raval,
(1987) 4 SCC 38 : 1987 SCC (L&S) 357; reversing(1986) 2 LLN 896 (Bom)(DB) : 1986 Lab IC
1575 and approving W.P. No. 614 of 1967 (Cal) dt. 6-1-1970].
Stone quarry although engaged also in cutting or chipping stones to appropriate sizes either
manually or mechanically before marketing them, rightly held by High Court to be an establishment
covered by the said notification and not a factory. Lakshmani Stone Products v. Union of India,
(2001) 2 SCC 496 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 456.
► M.P. Act 20 of 1978 : Neither prevails over, nor is repugnant to the EPF & M.P. Act.—
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (Central Act) is made
applicable to educational institution in State of M.P. with effect from 6-3-1982. State Act 20 of 1978
known as M.P. Ashahakiya Shikshan Sanstha Adhyapakka Tatha Ruya Karmacharika Sandaya
Adhiniyam, 1978 was then in existence. When demands for P.F. contribution were made, petitioner
objected to the same on the ground that State Act which was enacted later then Central Act has
received the assent of the President and as such the State Act would prevail in view of Article 254(2)
of the Constitution. Rejecting the submission it was held that there is no repugnancy in the two Acts
in so far as provident fund benefits are concerned. Even assuming that the State Act of 1978
created or affected any scheme for provident fund, the Central Act became applicable in the State
of M.P. for the first time on 6-3-1982 that is much later than the enactment of State Act 20 of 1978.
M.P. Shikshak Congress v. Regional Provident Fund Commr., (1999) 1 SCC 396.
2. Definitions.—In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,—
16
[(a) “appropriate Government” means—
(i) in relation to an establishment belonging to, or under the control of, the
Central Government or in relation to an establishment connected with a
railway company, a major port, a mine or an oilfield or a controlled
industry, 17 [or in relation to an establishment having departments or
branches in more than one State,] the Central Government; and
(ii) in relation to any other establishment, the State Government;]
18
[(aa) “authorised officer” means the Central Provident Fund Commissioner,
Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Deputy Provident Fund
Commissioner, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner or such other officer as
may be authorised by the Central Government, by notification in the Official
Gazette;]
(b) “basic wages” means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while
on duty or 19 [on leave or on holidays with wages in either case] in accordance
with the terms of the contract of employment and which are paid or payable in
cash to him, but does not include—
(i) the cash value of any food concession;
(ii) any dearness allowance (that is to say, all cash payments by whatever
name called paid to an employee on account of a rise in the cost of living),
house-rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other
similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or
of work done in such employment;
(iii) any presents made by the employer;
(c) “contribution” means a contribution payable in respect of a member under a
Scheme 20 [or the contribution payable in respect of an employee to whom the
Insurance Scheme applies];
(d) “controlled industry” means any industry the control of which by the Union
has been declared by a Central Act to be expedient in the public interest;
21 [(e) “employer” means—
Insurance Scheme, as the case may be] would, but for the exemption granted
under 26 [* * *] Section 17, have applied;
(fff) “exempted 27 [establishment]” means 28 [an establishment] in respect of
which an exemption has been granted under Section 17 from the operation of
all or any of the provisions of any Scheme, 29 [or the Insurance Scheme, as the
case may be] whether such exemption has been granted to the 30
[establishment] as such or to any person or class of persons employed
therein;]
(g) “factory” means any premises, including the precincts thereof, in any part of
which a manufacturing process is being carried on or is ordinarily so carried
on, whether with the aid of power or without the aid of power;
(gg) [* * *]31
(ggg) [* * *]32
(h) “Fund” means the provident fund established under a Scheme;
(i) “industry” means any industry specified in Schedule I, and includes any other
industry added to the Schedule by notification under Section 4;
33 [(i-a) “Insurance Fund” means the Deposit-linked Insurance Fund established
(kb) “Recovery Officer” means any officer of the Central Government, State
Government or the Board of Trustees constituted under Section 5-A, who may
be authorised by the Central Government, by notification in the Official
Gazette, to exercise the powers of a Recovery Officer under this Act;]
38 [(l) “Scheme” means the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme framed under
Section 5;]
39 [(ll) “superanuation”, in relation to an employee, who is the member of the
Pension Scheme means the attainment, by the said employee, of the age of
fifty-eight years;].
40 [(m) “Tribunal” means the Industrial Tribunal referred to in Section 7-D.]
NOTIFICATION
S.O. 796, dt. March 4, 1997.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (kb)
of Section 2 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
(19 of 1952) the Central Government hereby authorises the officers mentioned in
Column (2) of the Schedule mentioned below to exercise the powers of Recovery
Officers under the said Act for the areas mentioned in Column 3 of the said schedule in
relation to factories/establishments covered under the provisions of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Sl. Designation of the Office Area in relation to which
No. jurisdiction to be exercised
(1) (2) (3)
1. Regional Provident Fund The State of Andhra Pradesh
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund and the areas of Yaman in the
Commissioners working in Andhra Pradesh territory of Pondicherry.
Region of the Employees' Provident Fund
Organisation.
2. Regional Provident Fund The State of Bihar.
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioners working in Bihar Region of the
Employees Provident Fund Organisation.
3. Regional Provident Fund National Capital Territory of
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund Delhi.
Commissioners working in Delhi Region of the
Employees' Provident Fund Organisation.
4. Regional Provident Fund The State of Gujarat & Union
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund Territory of Dadra & Nagar
Commissioners working in Gujarat Region of the Haveli Daman and Diu.
Employees' Provident Fund Organisation.
5. Regional Provident Fund The State of Haryana.
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioners working in Haryana Region of
the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation.
6. Regional Provident Fund The State of Karnataka.
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund
Commissioners working in Karnataka Region of
the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation.
7. Regional Provident Fund The State of Kerala and Union
Commissioners/Assistant Provident Fund Territory of Lakshadeep and
Commissioners working in Kerala Region of the area of Mahe in the territories
Employees' Provident Fund Organisation. of Pondicherry.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 11 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
wages’ must be earned by an employee while on duty. Basic wages are those which are paid to all
employees of a concern and are generally paid to employees of all concerns. What may be paid to
some of the employees of a concern and to all employees of some concern may be emoluments but
may not have the characteristics essential for being described as ‘basic wages’. Burmah Shell Oil
Storage & Distributing Co. of India Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1981) 2 LLJ 86 : 1980 Lab IC 1129
(Del HC).
Incentive wage is not basic wage. R. Ramanathan Chettiar Jewellers v. Reg. Commr., E.P.F.,
Madurai, (1999) 81 FLR 559 (Mad).
“Basic wages” include Incentive bonus paid to employees as a condition of service on the basis
of excess clearance of coal within the period of eight hours of work. Poompuhar Shipping
Corporation Ltd., Tuticorin v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Madurai, 2004 LLR 135
(Mad).
Earned leave encashment is included as part of basic wages. Manipal Academy of Higher
Education v. P.F. Commr., (2004) 2 LLJ 35 : (2004) 100 FLR 1226 (Karn)(DB).
‘Overtime’ is something which is done not on time but thereafter. If extra work is done on time,
the same would not be overtime. For such work the workers may be entitled to extra remuneration.
Amal Kumar Ghatak v. R.P.F. Commr., (1980) 56 FJR 473 (Cal HC) : (1980) 2 LLJ 308.
Event of leave encashment being uncertain and contingent, is not universally, necessarily and
ordinarily paid to all across the board. Therefore, leave encashment is not part of basic wage for
calculation of employer's contribution towards provident fund. Manipal Academy of Higher
Education v. Provident Fund Commr., (2008) 5 SCC 428.
The basic principle as laid down in Bridge & Roofs case, AIR 1963 SC 1474 on a combined
reading of Sections 2(b) and (6) of this Act is that the test is one of universality. Where the wage is
universally, necessarily and ordinarily paid to all across the board such emoluments are basic
wages. Conversely, the payment which is available to be specially paid to those who avail of the
opportunity is not basic wages. By way of example it was held that overtime allowance, though it is
generally in force in all concerns is not earned by all employees of a concern. It is also earned in
accordance with the terms of the contract of employment but because it may not be earned by all
employees of a concern, it is excluded from basic wages. Likewise, any payment by way of a
special incentive or work is not basic wages. Manipal Academy of Higher Education v. Provident
Fund Commr., (2008) 5 SCC 428.
The term ‘basic wage’ which includes all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on
duty or on leave or on holidays with wages in accordance with the terms of the contract of
employment can only mean weekly holidays, national holidays and festival holidays, etc. Manipal
Academy of Higher Education v. Provident Fund Commr., (2008) 5 SCC 428.
► Section 2(c) : Contribution.—Contributions towards provident fund, held, is payable on
basic wages paid for a period when a workman is deemed to be on duty, as for example during a
lockout. Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills v. Union of India, (2001) 2 SCC 519 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 457.
► Section 2(e) : Employer.—In view of definition of Section 2(e) of the Act and Explanation I
to Section 405 Indian Penal Code, the Directors of company in no way can be held liable for
criminal prosecution for non-deposit of P.F. contribution of employees under the Act. B.P. Gupta v.
State of Bihar, (2000) 1 LLJ 1138 (Pat).
Where a receiver of a partnership firm was appointed under Order 40, CPC and there was no
evidence that the ultimate control of the affairs of the firm still vested in the partnership, the Receiver
and not the partnership was held to be the employer within the meaning of Section 2(e)(ii).
Provident Fund Inspector, Muvattupuzha v. Venkatachalam Chettiar, (1970) 1 LLJ 455 (Ker).
► Section 2(f) Employee.—A person is an employee if he does manual or clerical work or any
other work either in the establishment or in connection with the work of the establishment and is paid
wages for doing such work. Ratan Lal v. R.P.F. Commr., 1977 Lab IC 1765 (Del).
A person should be employed in or in connection with the work of establishment. Every
employment must rest on the relationship of master and servant and for deciding the existence of
such relationship the test of control is not the sole criterion. Mysore State Coop. Printing Works v.
R.P.F. Commr., 1976 Lab IC 1307 (Kar).
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 13 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The managing director or the director cannot be treated as employees of the company. Sanatan
Ghosh v. R.P.F. Commr., (1991) 2 LLJ 466 : (1990) 2 LLN 718 (Cal).
A partner cannot be said to be an employee of partnership firm even though he is getting salary
from the firm. S.G. Tin Printers (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commissioner, (2001) 1 LLJ 628 : (2001) 1 CLR
477.
Retainers being paid wages for the work of the petitioner establishment are employees. Gain
Financial Consultants v. R.P.F. Commissioner, (2001) 4 LLN 273 : (2001) 2 LLJ 1050 : (2001) 90
FLR 1096 (Bom).
Sons being paid wages are employees. Goverdhanlal Purohit v. R.P.F. Commr., (1993) 67 FLR
450 : (1994) 2 LLN 1359 : (1994) 2 CLR 880 (Raj).
The expression “in connection with” is to be interpreted in a broad sense so as to have some
connection, direct or indirect, with the employer's establishment. A person doing Liaison Officer's
work in Delhi for an establishment located in Vijayawada is an ‘employee’ of the establishment.
South India Research Institute v. R.P.F. Commr., (1981) 59 FJR 160 (AP HC).
Even if the person concerned has been employed through a contract in or in connection with the
work of establishment, he would yet fall within the description of employee within the meaning of the
Act. Even if a person is allowed to work : (1) at his own place and/or (2) at the hours of his own
choice and/or (3) for someone else the master-servant relationship does not cease. Satish Plastics
v. R.P.F. Commr., (1981) 2 LLJ 277 (Guj HC).
Women coming to a charitable trust to manufacture eatables out of raw materials supplied by the
trust and paid at piece-rate are nevertheless employees. Shree Kutchi Visha Oshwal Mahila
Mandal v. Union of India, (1993) 1 LLJ 77 : 1992 Lab IC 1449 : (1992) 1 CLR 805 (Bom).
Definition of ‘employee’ embraces a part-time employee as also an employee who is engaged for
any work in the establishment which may not necessarily be connected with the work of the
establishment. Rly. Employees' Coop. Banking Society Ltd. v. Union of India, 1980 Lab IC 1212
(Raj HC).
Trainees were ‘apprentices’ engaged under the “Standing Orders” of the establishment are not
employees. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Mangalore v. Central Arecanut & Coca
Marketing and Processing Coop. Ltd., (2006) 2 SCC 381.
Home workers as covered under the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act
will be covered under the EPF and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. Bagi Beedi Factory v. Appellate
Authority, (1997) 77 FLR 971 (Kant).
Persons collecting and returning raw material on consideration cannot be covered under the
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. Punjabi Khadi Mandal v. R.P.F.
Commr., (1997) 1 LLN 480 (P&H).
A person employed as a temporary substitute for a short period is not an employee. Kweens Bar
& Restaurant v. R.P.F. Commr., (1992) 2 CLR 909 : (1992) 65 FLR 492 (All).
The Government of India, by certain Notifications, extended the application of the Act and E.P.F.
Scheme to beedi industry. It was held that the workers engaged by the beedi manufacturers directly
or through contractors for rolling beedi at home, subject to rejection of defective beedis by the
manufacturers, were “employees” and were rightly covered by the Act and the scheme. P.M. Patel
v. Union of India, (1986) 1 SCC 32 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 155. Non-fixation of any date of retirement
was immaterial for implementation of the scheme to home workers. Ibid.
Employees working in two different establishments, though in the same building, and carried on
by two different persons cannot be clubbed together to attract the application of the Act. K.V.
Ratnam v. Govt. of India, (1987) 2 LLN 239 (AP) : 1987 Lab IC 1288.
Establishment of 22 tenants working as diamond cutters/polishers in the same building will not be
clubbed for provident fund purposes. Harshad Kumar M. Patel v. K.C.D. Gangawani, (1997) 1 LLJ
895 : (1997) 1 CLR 857 : (1997) 2 LLN 220 (Guj).
Employees not appointed as casual labour do not become so merely because the period of
contract was for limited periods of months. Swami v. R.P.F. Commr., (1987) 1 LLN 94 (AP)(DB) :
1987 Lab IC 719.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 14 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
► Pigmy agents of Bank..—Pigmy agents being paid commission on their collection but no
liberty was given to them to do any other business during their continuance in employment of Bank.
Wages paid to them as commission would be termed as basic wages under Section 2(b) of the Act,
1952 and they would be covered under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, hence, Act of
1952 applies to them, Pachora Peoples' Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Employees Provident Fund
Organisation, 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 29.
► Section 2(g) : Factory.—Publication and Press Departments of Andhra and Osmania
Universities are factories within the meaning of Section 2(g). Andhra University v. R.P.F. Commr.
of A.P., (1985) 4 SCC 509 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 134.
► Any premises including the precincts thereof, Meaning of.—The shop, and the service-
station, half a mile away cannot be deemed to be in precincts of the premises in which the
manufacturing of bodies for buses, etc., goes on, when there is no connection between the two
premises except that of ownership. The petitioners' shop where cars are sold should not be held to
form one premises along with the factory half a mile away. Metro Motors (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F.
Commr., Punjab, PLR 61 P&H 160 : (1959) 1 Lab LJ 56 : AIR 1959 Punj 89.
► Section 2 (i-c) : Manufacture.—Printing of text books, journals, registers, forms and various
forms of stationery in Publication and Press Departments of Andhra and Osmania Universities
constitutes ‘manufacture’ within the meaning of Section 2(i-c). Andhra University v. R.P.F. Commr.
of A.P., (1985) 4 SCC 509 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 134.
In the definition there is no indication that the meaning of the word ‘manufacture’ or
‘manufacturing process’ should be applied only when an establishment under the same employer
manufactures an article and for that purpose carries on the entire manufacturing process. S.S.
Mussadi v. R.P.F. Commr., 1978 Lab IC 1401 (Cal).
Where the petitioner company maintained a workshop for repairing and servicing of cars and
dealt also in motor accessories, cars, trucks, etc., the activity of the petitioner comes within the
expression “manufacture” in Section 2(i-c), read with the Explanation in Schedule I. Lawly Sen &
Co. v. R.P.F. Commr. of Bihar, (1959) 1 Lab LJ 272 : 1958 BLJR 722 : AIR 1959 Pat 271. It is held
that even though the goods are only reconditioned at the factory and only remuneration for repair is
charged, nevertheless as it treats the goods bought by other people for the purpose of repair with a
view that the worn-out parts may ultimately be put to use, metallizing of worn-out parts will fall within
the description of business mentioned in Schedule I. Metallizing Corpn. (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr.,
West Bengal, (1964) 9 FLR 253 (Cal).
► “Excluded employees”.—Expression “the fund” occurring in Para 2(f) as well as in Paras
26 and 69 makes it clear that reference therein is only to fund created under the 1952 Scheme and
not any fund. Thus, to be “excluded employee”, employee must have been member of fund
established under the 1952 Scheme who had withdrawn full amount of his accumulations on
retirement after attaining age of 55 yrs. Retired railway employees who had withdrawn their
accumulations in General Provident Fund or any other Fund of which they were members, could not
be treated as “excluded employees” for purpose of the 1952 Scheme since such withdrawal was not
from the 1952 Scheme because they were never members of said Scheme. Relaxation cannot be
granted in relation to employee who was earlier member of other fund but later joins establishment
where he would be entitled to membership of fund created under the 1952 Scheme, Modern
Transportation Consultation Services (P) Ltd. v. Provident Fund Commr., (2020) 11 SCC 568.
41
[2-A. Establishment to include all departments and branches.—For the removal of
doubts, it is hereby declared that where an establishment consists of different
departments or has branches, whether situate in the same place or in different places,
all such departments or branches shall be treated as parts of the same establishment.]
► Scope.—The insertion of Section 2-A merely clarifies the position that the Act applies to
composite factories and does not mean that before its insertion the position was somewhat different.
Union of India v. Ogale Glass Works, (1971) 2 SCC 678.
► Applicability.—Company having export and import business of non-ferrous metals with head
office at Madras and a factory for rolling non-ferrous metals situated in another place—Held, Act
applicable to the workers of the factory—However, if any employee of the Madras head office is not
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 15 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
connected with the factory, the R.P.F. Commissioner should exclude him. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana
Chettiar v. R.P.F. Commr., AIR 1970 Mad 194 : (1970) 1 LLJ 296 (Mad).
► Clubbing of different units.—To decide whether different units are part of the same
establishment, court has to assess the extent of functional integrity between them and also whether
one unit can exist conveniently and reasonably without the other. Noor Niwas Nursery Public
School v. R.P.F. Commr., (2001) 1 SCC 1.
Mere common ownership of two establishments will not justify their clubbing under the Act.
Devesh Sandeep Associates v. R.P.F. Commr., (1997) 1 LLJ 1167 : (1997) 2 LLN 867 : (1997) 1
CLR 273 (Kant).
Clubbing of school of speech and its branches as part of the same establishment will be justified
since the petitioner had got full control over the branches and there is no independence and
financial integrality between the petitioner and the branches. E. Gajendran v. R.P.F. Commr.,
(1997) 2 CLR 1193 (Kant).
► Claim for exemption.—In Shree Vishal Printers Ltd. v. Provident Fund Commr., (2019) 9
SCC 508, there was denial of exemption on ground that the three establishments viz. (i) BCCL,
Jaipur (ii) TPHL, Jaipur and (iii) SVPL, Jaipur were part of same establishment i.e. BCCL, Mumbai.
BCCL, Jaipur is not a separate entity but part of parent Company BCCL, Mumbai directly. It was
held that mere location of departments and branches in different cities inconsequential, hence, no
exemption can be granted to BCCL, Jaipur. Further held, as far as TPHL, Jaipur and SVPL, Jaipur
are concerned applicable test for determining one establishment would be functional integrality or
general unity of purpose and not test of unity of ownership, management and control. Further,
business model of outsourcing not being prevalent in relevant period said principle inapplicable for
testing nature of linkage. Moreover nature of agreement provided that said units would make
available both space and staff for benefit of BCCL, Mumbai and expenses of establishment were
also to be borne by them. Beside BCCL, Mumbai was issuing orders on their letter pads. Fact that
there was no commonality of Directors, shareholders, no financial unity, separate balance sheets as
well as profit and loss accounts, independent employees with no transfer inter se, is
inconsequential. Said three establishments were effectively part of same parent Company and
cannot be granted exemption from applicability of 1952 Act which is a beneficial legislation.
42
[3. Power to apply Act to an establishment which has a common provident fund
with another establishment.—Where immediately before this Act becomes applicable
to an establishment there is in existence a provident fund which is common to the
employees employed in that establishment and employees in any other establishment,
the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that the
provisions of this Act shall also apply to such other establishment.]
► Applicability of Act.—Where after death of the owner of an establishment, a partition took
place between his son and two sisters resulting in cessation of the establishment by disruption into
three separate establishments, each one having less than 20 workers, the Act will not apply. K.M.
Mohd. Kutti v. R.P.F. Commr., (1968) 2 LLJ 466 (Ker) : 17 FLR 456.
4. Power to add to Schedule I.—(1) The Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, add to Schedule I any other industry in respect of the employees
whereof it is of opinion that a provident fund scheme should be framed under this Act,
and thereupon the industry so added shall be deemed to be an industry specified in
Schedule I for the purposes of this Act.
(2) All notifications under sub-section (1) shall be laid before Parliament, as soon as
may be, after they are issued.
► Beedi Industry.—G.S.R. 660 dated May 17, 1977 adding beedi industry to Schedule I and
G.S.R. 677 dated May 23, 1977 amending the E.P.F. Scheme so as to bring the industry within the
purview of the scheme were not hit by Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 31. P.M. Patel v. Union of India,
(1986) 1 SCC 32 : 1986 SCC (L&S) 155.
5. Employees' Provident Fund Schemes.—43 [(1)] The Central Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, frame a Scheme to be called the Employees'
Provident Fund Scheme for the establishment of provident funds under this Act for
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 16 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
employees or for any class of employees and specify the 44 [establishments] or class of
45 [establishments] to which the said Scheme shall apply 46 [and there shall be
established, as soon as may be after the framing of the Scheme, a Fund in accordance
with the provisions of this Act and the Scheme].
47
[(1-A) The Fund shall vest in, and be administered by, the Central Board
constituted under Section 5-A.
(1-B) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a Scheme framed under sub-section (1)
may provide for all or any of the matters specified in Schedule II.]
48 [(2)
A Scheme framed under sub-section (1) may provide that any of its
provisions shall take effect either prospectively or retrospectively on such date as may
be specified in this behalf in the Scheme.]
► Constitutionality.—Delegation of power under Section 5 to frame the scheme is not ultra
vires the Act or Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Cotton Corpn. of India v. Union of India,
(1993) 1 LLN 311 : (1993) 1 LLJ 1015 : 1993 Lab IC 21 (Raj)(DB).
► Scheme : Applicability.—A scheme framed under Section 5 would not apply to casual
employees. Cotton Corpn. of India v. Union of India, (1993) 1 LLN 311 : (1993) 1 LLJ 1015 : 1993
Lab IC 21 (Raj)(DB).
► Claim : Nature of.—Claim to credit in provident fund account is an actionable claim. Sunrise
Associates v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, (2006) 5 SCC 603.
► Employers' duty to contribute—absence of demand no waiver.—T.N. Electricity Board
was not allowed to avoid payment of special contribution to Provident Fund under their own
Provident Fund Regulations on the pretext that it was gratuity payable under the Payment of Gratuity
Act, 1972. Katheeja Bai v. Superintending Engineer, (1984) 3 SCC 518 : 1984 SCC (L&S) 564.
Paragraph 30 of the scheme would show that it is the employer who is to make contribution both with
regard to his share and with regard to the share of the employee. He can, under Paragraph 32,
recover the amount of the employee's contribution from the employee. There is thus a duty cast
upon the employer to contribute both the shares i.e., his share as also that of the employee.
Therefore, because no demand for contribution was made for about three years, the demand will not
be deemed to have been waived by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner. N.K. Industries (P)
Ltd., Kanpur v. R.P.F. Commr., U.P., 1958 All LJ 248 : 1958 All WR (HC) 325 : AIR 1958 All 474 :
(1958) 2 LLJ 19.
In view of Para 69(1)(a) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, the employer is not
liable to remit provident fund dues in respect of the employees who were, after retiring and
withdrawing their provident dues, reappointed to do some job as per their convenience and subject
to their health. Bombay Printers Ltd. v. Union of India, (1992) 1 LLJ 816 : (1991) 63 FLR 106
(Bom).
► Delay in Payment of P.F.—Invocation of the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986,
permissible against Provident Fund Commissioner by member-employee for delay in payment of
Provident Fund under EPF Scheme. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Shiv Kumar Joshi,
(2000) 1 SCC 98.
► Pension and Provident Fund.—Pension is payable periodically as long as pensioner is alive
whereas CPF is paid only once on retirement. On receipt of CPF amount, relationship between
employee and employer ceases to exist without leaving any further legal right or obligation qua each
other, PEPSU RTC v. Mangal Singh, (2011) 11 SCC 702 : (2011) 2 SCC (L&S) 322.
49
[5-A. Central Board.—(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, constitute with effect from such date as may be specified therein, a
Board of Trustees for the territories to which this Act extends (hereinafter in this Act
referred to as the Central Board) consisting of the following 50 [persons as members],
namely:—
(a) 51 [a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman] to be appointed by the Central
Government;
52
[(aa) the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, ex officio;]
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 17 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) not more than five persons appointed by the Central Government from
amongst its officials;
(c) not more than fifteen persons representing Governments of such States as
the Central Government may specify in this behalf appointed by the Central
Government;
(d) 53 [ten persons] representing employers of the establishment to which the
Scheme applies, appointed by the Central Government after consultation with
such organisations of employers as may be recognised by the Central
Government in this behalf; and
(e) 54 [ten persons] representing employees in the establishments to which the
Scheme applies, appointed by the Central Government after consultation with
such organisations of employees as may be recognised by the Central
Government in this behalf.
(2) The terms and conditions subject to which a member of the Central Board may
be appointed and the time, place and procedure of the meetings of the Central Board
shall be such as may be provided for in the Scheme.
(3) The Central Board shall 55 [, subject to the provisions of Section 6-A] 56 [and
Section 6-C], administer the fund vested in it in such manner as may be specified in
the Scheme.
(4) The Central Board shall perform such other functions as it may be required to
perform by or under any provisions of the Scheme 57 [, the [Pension]58 Scheme and the
Insurance Scheme].
59 [(5)
The Central Board shall maintain proper accounts of its income and
expenditure in such form and in such manner as the Central Government may, after
consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, specify in the Scheme.
(6) The accounts of the Central Board shall be audited annually by the Comptroller
and Auditor-General of India and any expenditure incurred by him in connection with
such audit shall be payable by the Central Board to the Comptroller and Auditor-
General of India.
(7) The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and any person appointed by him
in connection with the audit of the accounts of the Central Board shall have the same
rights and privileges and authority in connection with such audit as the Comptroller
and Auditor-General has, in connection with the audit of Government accounts and, in
particular, shall have the right to demand the production of books, accounts,
connected vouchers, documents and papers and inspect any of the offices of the
Central Board.
(8) The accounts of the Central Board as certified by the Comptroller and Auditor-
General of India or any other person appointed by him in this behalf together with the
audit report thereon shall be forwarded to the Central Board which shall forward the
same to the Central Government along with its comments on the report of the
Comptroller and Auditor-General.
(9) It shall be the duty of the Central Board to submit also to the Central
Government an annual report of its work and activities and the Central Government
shall cause a copy of the annual report, the audited accounts together with the report
of the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India and the comments of the Central
Board thereon to be laid before each House of Parliament.]
60 [5-AA. Executive Committee.—(1) The Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, constitute, with effect from such date as may be specified therein,
an Executive Committee to assist the Central Board in the performance of its
functions.
(2) The Executive Committee shall consist of the following persons as members,
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 18 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
namely:—
(a) a Chairman appointed by the Central Government from amongst the
members of the Central Board;
(b) two persons appointed by the Central Government from amongst the persons
referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 5-A;
(c) three persons appointed by the Central Government from amongst the
persons referred to in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 5-A;
(d) three persons representing the employers elected by the Central Board from
amongst the persons referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 5-
A;
(e) three persons representing the employees elected by the Central Board from
amongst the persons referred to in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of Section 5-
A;
(f) the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, ex officio.
(3) The terms and conditions subject to which a member of the Central Board may
be appointed or elected to the Executive Committee and the time, place and procedure
of the meetings of the Executive Committee shall be such as may be provided for in
the Scheme.]
61 5-B. State Board.—(1) The Central Government may, after consultation with the
Government of any State, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute for that
State a Board of Trustees (hereinafter in this Act referred to as the State Board) in
such manner as may be provided for in the Scheme.
(2) A State Board shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as the
Central Government may assign to it from time to time.
(3) The terms and conditions subject to which a member of a State Board may be
appointed and the time, place and procedure of the meetings of a State Board shall be
such as may be provided for in the Scheme.
62 5-C. Board of Trustees to be body corporate.—Every Board of Trustees constituted
under Section 5-A or Section 5-B shall be a body corporate under the name specified
in the notification constituting it, having perpetual succession and a common seal and
shall by the said name sue and be sued.
63
5-D. Appointment of officers.—(1) The Central Government shall appoint a Central
Provident Fund Commissioner who shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Central
Board and shall be subject to the general control and superintendence of that Board.
(2) The Central Government may also appoint 64 [a Financial Adviser and Chief
Accounts Officer] to assist the Central Provident Fund Commissioner in the discharge
of his duties.
(3) The Central Board may appoint 65 [, subject to the maximum scale of pay, as
may be specified in the Scheme, as many Additional Central Provident Fund
Commissioners, Deputy Provident Fund Commissioners, Regional Provident Fund
Commissioners, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioners and] such other officers and
employees as it may consider necessary for the efficient administration of the Scheme
66 [, the [Pension]67 Scheme and the Insurance Scheme].
the State Board not to be invalidated on certain grounds.—No act done or proceeding
taken by the Central Board or the Executive Committee constituted under Section 5-
AA or the State Board shall be questioned on the ground merely of the existence of
any vacancy in, or any defect in the constitution of, the Central Board or the Executive
Committee or the State Board, as the case may be.]
73
[5-E. Delegation.—74 [The Central Board may delegate to the Executive Committee
or to the Chairman of the Board or to any of its officers and a State Board may
delegate to its Chairman or to any of its officers], subject to such conditions and
limitations, if any, as it may specify, such of its powers and functions under this Act as
it may deem necessary for the efficient administration of the Scheme 75 [, the
[Pension]76 Scheme and the Insurance Scheme].]
6. Contributions and matters which may be provided for in Schemes.— [* * *]77
The contribution which shall be paid by the employer to the Fund shall be [ten per
cent]78 of the basic wages, 79 [dearness allowance and retaining allowance (if any)], for
the time being payable to each of the employees 80 [(whether employed by him directly
or by or through a contractor)], and the employee's contribution shall be equal to the
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 20 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
contribution payable by the employer in respect of him and may, 81 [if any employee so
desires, be an amount exceeding [ten per cent]82 of his basic wages, dearness
allowance and retaining allowance (if any), subject to the condition that the employer
shall not be under an obligation to pay any contribution over and above his
contribution payable under this section]:
[ [Provided that in its application to any establishment or class of establishments
83 84
which the Central Government, after making such enquiry as it deems fit, may, by
notification in the Official Gazette specify, this section shall be subject to the
modification that for the words [ten per cent]85 , at both the places where they occur,
the words 86 [twelve per cent] shall be substituted : ]
Provided further that]87 where the amount of any contribution payable under this
Act involves a fraction of a rupee, the Scheme may provide for the rounding off of such
fraction to the nearest rupee, half of a rupee or quarter of a rupee.
Explanation88 [1].—For the purposes of this 89 [section] dearness allowance shall be
deemed to include also the cash value of any food concession allowed to the employee.
90 [Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this 91 [section] “retaining allowance” means
an allowance payable for the time being to an employee of any factory or other
establishment during any period in which the establishment is not working, for
retaining his services.]
[* * *]92
NOTIFICATIONS
(1)
LIST OF INDUSTRIES/CLASSES OF ESTABLISHMENTS IN RESPECT OF WHICH
THE STATUTORY RATE HAS BEEN ENHANCED UNDER THE FIRST PROVISO TO
SECTION 6
Important Note.—Notification below though repealed w.e.f. 1-5-1997 by Noti. No.
S.O. 320(E) dt. 9-4-1997 is being published here for its historical value. See this
repealing notification below.
S.O. 360(E), dated 17th May, 1989.93 —In exercise of the powers conferred by
the first proviso to Section 6 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby specifies, with
effect from the 1st day of June, 1989, every establishment in the industries specified
in the Schedule annexed hereto and the classes of establishments specified in the said
Schedule, as the establishments and classes of establishments to which the said
proviso shall apply:
Provided that nothing contained in this notification shall apply to:—
(i) any establishment in which less than 50 persons are employed;
94 [(ii) any sick industrial company, as defined in clause (o) of sub-section (1) of
Explanation.—For the purposes of clause (iii), “Cash loss” means loss as computed
without providing for depreciation.
SCHEDULE
NAME OF INDUSTRY ENGAGED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS
OR CLASS OF ESTABLISHMENTS
Sl. No.
1. Cement.
2. Cigarettes.
3. Electrical, mechanical or general engineering products.
4. Iron and Steel.
5. Matches [other than hand-made matches.]96
6. Edible oils and fats, including vanaspati.
7. Sugar.
8. Rubber and rubber products.
9. Electricity including the generation, transmission and distribution thereof.
10. Tea.
11. Printing including the process of composing types for printing, printing by
letterpress, lithography, photogravure or other similar process or bookbinding.
12. Glass.
13. Stoneware pipes.
14. Sanitarywares.
15. Electrical porcelain insulators of high and low tension.
16. Refractories.
17. Tiles.
18. Heavy and fine chemicals including the following:
(a) Fertilisers;
(b) Turpentine;
(c) Resin;
(d) Medical and pharmaceutical preparations;
(e) Toilet preparations;
(f) Soaps;
(g) Inks;
(h) Intermediates, dyes, colour, lacs and toners;
(i) Fatty acids; and
(j) Oxygen, acetylene and carbon dioxide gases.
19. Indigo.
20. Lac including shellac.
21. Non-edible vegetable and animal oils and fats.
22. Mineral oil refining.
23. Industrial and power alcohol.
97 [24. Asbestos cement sheets.]
25. Biscuit making industry, including composite units making biscuits and
products, such as bread, confectionery and milk powder.
26. Mica.
27. Plywood.
28. Automobile repairing and servicing.
29. Rice milling.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 22 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
spectators.
81. Societies, club or associations which provide board or lodging or both or facility
for amusement or any other service to any of their members or to any of their
guests on payment.
82. Companies, Societies, Associations, Clubs or Troupes which give any exhibition
of acrobatic or other performances or both, in any arena circular or otherwise or
perform or permit any other form of entertainment in any place, other than a
theatre and require payment for admission into such exhibition or entertainment
as spectators or audience.
83. Canteens.
84. Attorneys, as defined in the Advocates Act, 1961 (25 of 1961).
85. Chartered or registered accountants, as defined in Chartered Accountants Act,
1949 (38 of 1949).
86. Cost and Work Accountants within the meaning of the Cost and Works
Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959).
87. Engineer and engineering contractors, not being exclusively engaged in building
and construction industry.
88. Architects.
89. Medical practitioners and medical specialists.
90. Travel agencies engaged in (i) booking of international air and sea passages and
other travel arrangement, (ii) booking of internal air and mail passages and other
travel arrangements, and (iii) forwarding and clearing of cargo from and to
overseas and within India.
91. Forwarding agencies engaged in the collection, packing, forwarding or delivery
of any goods including car loading, break-bulk service and foreign freight service.
92. Stone quarries producing roof and floor slabs dimension stones, monumental
stones and mosaic chips.
93. Banks doing business in one State or Union Territory and having no branches or
departments outside the State or Union Territory.
94. Establishments engaged in sorting, clearing and testing of cotton waste
industry.
95. Garments making factories.
96. Establishments which are factories engaged in the manufacture of glue and
gelatine.
97. Establishments engaged in fish processing and non-vegetable food preservation
industry including bacon factories and pork processing plants.
98. Financial establishments (other than banks, doing business in more than one
State or Union Territory, Unit Trust of India, Agricultural Refinance Corporation,
Industrial Development Bank of India, Industrial Finance Corporation of India
and State Finance Corporations) engaged in the activities of borrowing, lending,
advancing of money and dealing with other monetary transactions with a view to
earn interest.
99. 98 [Textiles (made wholly or in part of cotton or wool or silk whether natural or
artificial).]
(2)
S.O. 320(E), dated April 9, 1997.—In exercise of the powers conferred by the
first proviso to Section 6 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) and in supersession of the notifications specified in
Schedule I to this notification except as respects things done or omitted to be done
before such supersession, the Central Government after making necessary inquiry into
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 25 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the matter hereby specifies with effect from the first day of May, 1997 every
establishment and class of establishments other than those specified in Schedule II,
to which the said proviso shall apply, the words “eight and one-third per cent at both
the places where they occur, the words “ten per cent” shall be substituted.
SCHEDULE I
(i) S.O. No. 360 dated the 17th May, 1989
(ii) S.O. No. 1837 dated the 29th June, 1990
(iii) S.O. No. 627(E) dated the 31st August, 1994
(iv) S.O. No. 126(E) dated the 1st March, 1995
SCHEDULE II
Establishments to which the first proviso to Section 6 shall not apply:
(i) Any establishment in which less than twenty persons are employed;
(ii) Any sick industrial company as defined in clause (o) of sub-section (1) of
Section 3 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of
1986) and which has been declared as such by the Board for Industrial and
Financial Reconstruction established under Section 4 of the Act, for the period
commencing on and from the date of registration of the reference in the Board
and ending either on the date by which the net worth of the said company
becomes positive in terms of the orders passed under sub-section (2) of Section
17 of that Act or on the last date of implementation of the scheme sanctioned
under Section 18 of that Act;
(iii) Any establishment which has at the end of any financial year accumulated
losses equal to or exceeding its entire net worth that is, the sum total of paid-up
capital and free reserves and has also suffered cash losses in such financial year
and the financial year immediately preceding such financial year.
Explanation.—For the purposes of clause (iii) “cash loss” means loss as computed
without providing for depreciation;
(iv) Any establishment in the,—
(A) Jute industry;
(B) Beedi industry;
(C) Brick industry;
(D) Coir industry other than the spinning sector; and
(E) Gaur gum factories.
99
[(v) Any establishment, other than Central Public Sector Enterprises and State
Public Sector Enterprises and other establishments owned by, or under the
control of the Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be,
in respect of wages payable by it for the months of May, June and July, 2020.
Provided that this clause shall not be applicable to the establishments eligible for relief
under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana guidelines issued by the Employees'
Provident Fund Organization vide its Office Memorandum No.C-1/Misc./2020-
21/[Link]/Pt., dated 9th April, 2020.]
(3)
SUMMARY OF RATES APPLICABLE ON VARIOUS DATES
I. Till 30-4-1997 1. To all units employing upto 49 8.33%
persons
2. To all units having 50 or more 10%
employees engaged in industries or
activities notified in the Schedule in
S.O. 360(E), dt. 17-5-1989 (given
above on p. 1027) except those
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 26 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in that respect was necessary to be issued by the authorities. P.F. Inspector v. Ram Kumar, 1983
Lab IC 717 (P&H HC).
► Non-payment of employer's contribution.—The words “contribution”, “scheme” and “fund”
occurring in Section 6 apply to private schemes as well. Hence, a default in “contribution” by an
establishment exempted under Section 17 amounts to contravention of Section 6 and is punishable
under Section 14(1-A). N.K. Jain v. C.K. Shah, (1991) 2 SCC 495 : 1991 SCC (Cri) 328 : 1991
SCC (L&S) 656.
Continued non-payment of employer's contribution under the Act after the due date is a
continuing offence. Bhagirath Kanoria v. State of M.P., (1984) 4 SCC 222 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 30.
However, see R.P.F. Commr. v. K. Mohammed, 1994 Supp (3) SCC 673 : 1995 SCC (L&S) 195
where in peculiar circumstances of the case the Supreme Court set aside the prosecution.
Management of a school cannot escape the liability to deposit EPF contribution on D.A. paid to
the staff even when it was received through the Government. Gyan Bharati v. R.P.F. Andaman and
Nicobar Island, 1996 Lab IC 2005 (Cal).
Where the petitioner was only an association of bus-owners employing only 7 persons on
monthly payment basis and the drivers, cleaners, etc., were employed by individual bus-owners, the
requirements of Section 1(3)(b) were not satisfied and the petitioner was not liable to make any
contribution under Section 6. Balasore Motor Assn. v. R.P.F. Commr., AIR 1970 Ori 199 : (1970) 1
LLJ 559 : 1970 Lab IC 1393.
Although the appellant (employer) had not deducted the employees' contribution from the wages
of the home workers concerned during the pendency of litigation, the appellant, held, not entitled to
waiver of liability for contribution from the month succeeding the month of decision in P.M. Patel
and Sons case (September 1985) till 3-5-1993, albeit by virtue of the clarification issued by the
Government under para 78 of EPF Scheme as well as the general stay granted by Supreme Court,
he stood protected for the period June 1977 to September 1985. S.K. Nasiruddin Beedi Merchant
Ltd. v. Central P.F. Commr., (2001) 2 SCC 612 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 479.
► E.P.F. Scheme, 1952.—Retrospective application of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme,
1952 w.e.f. 1-10-1984 by Notification G.S.R. 347 dated 30-4-1986 to cinema theatres covered by
the said notification by adding Item (xcviii) to Para 1(3)(b) of the scheme is sustainable by virtue of
Section 5(2) as well as Section 7(1). But, in view of provisions of Paras 30 and 32, the employer
could not be saddled with the liability to pay the employees' contribution for the retrospective period.
District Exhibitors Association v. Union of India, (1991) 3 SCC 119 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 822.
► Employees’ Pension Scheme.—Reference to date of commencement of Scheme or date on
which salary exceeds ceiling limit are dates from which option exercised are to be reckoned with for
calculation of pensionable salary. Said dates are not cutoff dates to determine eligibility of employer
-employee to indicate their option under proviso to Clause 11(3) of Pension Scheme. Further held,
beneficial scheme, ought not to be allowed to be defeated by reference to cut-off date, particularly
in situation where employer has deposited 12% of actual salary and not 12% of ceiling limit of Rs
5000 or Rs 6500 p.m., as case may be. Moreover, exercise of option under Para 26(6) of
Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme cannot estop employees from exercising similar option under
Clause 11(3). If both employer and employee opt for deposit against actual salary and not ceiling
amount, exercise of option under Para 26 of Provident Funds Scheme is inevitable, which is
necessary precursor to exercise of option under Clause 11(3). Exercise of such option, therefore,
does not foreclose exercise of further option under Clause 11(3) of Pension Scheme unless
circumstances warranting such foreclosure are clearly indicated, R.P. Gupta v. EPFO, (2018) 14
SCC 809.
100
[6-A. Employees' Pension Scheme.—(1) The Central Government may, by
notification in the Official Gazette, frame a scheme to be called the Employees' Pension
Scheme for the purpose of providing for—
(a) superannuation pension, retiring pension or permanent total disablement
pension to the employees of any establishment or class of establishments to
which this Act applies; and
(b) widow or widower's pension, children pension or orphan pension payable to
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 28 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) There shall be established, as soon as may be after the framing of the Insurance
Scheme, a Deposit-linked Insurance Fund into which shall be paid by the employer
from time to time in respect of every such employee in relation to whom he is the
employer, such amount, not being more than one per cent of the aggregate of the
basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance (if any) for the time being
payable in relation to such employee as the Central Government may, by notification
in the Official Gazette, specify.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, the expressions ‘dearness
allowance’ and ‘retaining allowance’ have the same meanings as in Section 6.
(3) [* * *]102
(4)(a) The employer shall pay into the Insurance Fund such further sums of money,
not exceeding one-fourth of the contribution which he is required to make under sub-
section (2), as the Central Government may, from time to time, determine to meet all
the expenses in connection with the administration of the Insurance Scheme other
than the expenses towards the cost of any benefits provided by or under that scheme.
(b) [* * *]103
(5) The Insurance Fund shall vest in the Central Board and be administered by it in
such manner as may be specified in the Insurance Scheme.
(6) The Insurance Scheme may provide for all or any of the matters specified in
Schedule IV.
(7) The Insurance Scheme may provide that any of its provisions shall take effect
either prospectively or retrospectively on such date as may be specified in this behalf
in that Scheme.]
NOTIFICATIONS
Noti. No. S.O. 828(E), dated March 15, 2017.—In exercise of the powers
conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (4) of Section 6-C of the Employees' Provident
Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), and in supersession of the
notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Labour and Employment
published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii),
vide number S.O. 324(E), dated the 2nd February, 2015, except as respects things
done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Government hereby
determines that no sum shall be payable for the time being by the employer in
relation to his employees as the further sum payable by the employer every month to
the Deposit-Linked Insurance Fund for the meeting the expenses in connection with
the administration of the Employees Deposit-Linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 other
than the expenses towards the cost of any benefits provided by or under that scheme.
2. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby notified that nothing contained in this
notification shall affect the administrative charges payable in respect of the period up
to and inclusive of the 31st March, 2017 in respect of which the notification referred to
in Paragraph 1 herein shall continue to apply as if the same had not been superseded.
3. This notification shall come into force from 1st day of April, 2017.
104 [6-D. Laying of Schemes before Parliament.—Every scheme framed under Section
5, Section 6-A and Section 6-C shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is framed,
before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days
which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if,
before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive
sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the scheme, or
both Houses agree that the scheme should not be framed, the scheme shall thereafter
have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so,
however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the
validity of anything previously done under that scheme.]
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 30 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
parte, he may, within three months from the date of communication of such order,
apply to the officer for setting aside such order and if he satisfies the officer that the
show-cause notice was not duly served or that he was prevented by any sufficient
cause from appearing when the inquiry was held, the officer shall make an order
setting aside his earlier order and shall appoint a date for proceeding with the inquiry:
Provided that no such order shall be set aside merely on the ground that there has
been irregularity in the service of the show-cause notice if the officer is satisfied that
the employer had notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 31 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
an order made under sub-section (1) of Section 7-A, but from which no appeal has
been preferred under this Act, and who, from the discovery of new and important
matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within his
knowledge or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made, or
on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or for any other
sufficient reason, desires to obtain a review of such order may apply for a review of
that order to the officer who passed the order:
Provided that such officer may also on his own motion review his order if he is
satisfied that it is necessary so to do on any such ground.
(2) Every application for review under sub-section (1) shall be filed in such form
and manner and within such time as may be specified in the Scheme.
(3) Where it appears to the officer receiving an application for review that there is
no sufficient ground for a review, he shall reject the application.
(4) Where the officer is of opinion that the application for review should be granted,
he shall grant the same:
Provided that,—
(a) no such application shall be granted without previous notice to all the parties
before him to enable them to appear and be heard in support of the order in
respect of which a review is applied for, and
(b) no such application shall be granted on the ground of discovery of new
matter or evidence which the applicant alleges was not within his knowledge
or could not be produced by him when the order was made, without proof of
such allegation.
(5) No appeal shall lie against the order of the officer rejecting an application for
review, but an appeal under this Act shall lie against an order passed under review as
if the order passed under review were the original order passed by him under Section
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 33 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-A.
7-C. Determination of escaped amount.—Where an order determining the amount
due from an employer under Section 7-A or Section 7-B has been passed and if the
officer who passed the order—
(a) has reason to believe that by reason of the omission or failure on the part of
the employer to make any document or report available, or to disclose, fully
and truly, all material facts necessary for determining the correct amount due
from the employer, any amount so due from such employer for any period has
escaped his notice;
(b) has, in consequence of information in his possession, reason to believe that
any amount to be determined under Section 7-A or Section 7-B has escaped
from his determination for any period notwithstanding that there has been no
omission or failure as mentioned in clause (a) on the part of the employer,
he may, within a period of five years from the date of communication of the order
passed under Section 7-A or Section 7-B, re-open the case and pass appropriate
orders re-determining the amount due from the employer in accordance with the
provisions of this Act:
Provided that no order re-determining the amount due from the employer shall be
passed under this section unless the employer is given a reasonable opportunity of
representing his case.
116 [7-D. Tribunal.—The Industrial Tribunal constituted by the Central Government
under sub-section (1) of Section 7-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 shall, on and
from the commencement of Part XIV of Chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2017, be the
Tribunal for the purposes of this Act and the said Tribunal shall exercise the
jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on it by or under this Act.]
NOTIFICATION
Noti. No. S.O. 2838(E), dt. 7-11-2014.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (1) of Section 7-D of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) and in partial supersession of the notification of the
Government of India in the erstwhile Ministry of Labour number S.O. 491(E), dated
the 30th June, 1997, insofar as it relates to the establishments situated within the
territories of the States of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana
and Goa, and the Union Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Puducherry,
except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the
Central Government hereby constitutes the Employees' Provident Funds Appellate
Tribunal at Bengaluru, with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the
Official Gazette to exercise the powers and discharge the functions conferred on it by
said Act in respect of establishments situated within the territories of the States of
Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Goa, and the Union
Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Puducherry.
2. The Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal shall sit in Bengaluru.
3. The existing Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal in Delhi shall
exercise the powers and discharge the functions conferred on it by the said Act in
respect of establishments situated within the Territories of India other than the States
of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telengana and Goa, and the Union
Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Puducherry.
4. On and from the date of publication of this notification, the Presiding Officer of
the Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal in Delhi shall transfer the cases
pending before the said Tribunal in respect of establishments falling within the
aforesaid jurisdiction of the Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru,
to the said Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 34 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) from the employer in relation to 124 [an establishment] to which any Scheme
125 [or the Insurance Scheme] applies in respect of any contribution payable to
126 [the
Fund or, as the case may be, the Insurance Fund], damages
recoverable under Section 14-B, accumulations required to be transferred
under sub-section (2) of Section 15 127 [or under sub-section (5) of Section
17] or any charges payable by him under any other provision of this Act or of
any provision of the Scheme 128 [or the Insurance Scheme]; or
(b) from the employer in relation to an exempted 129 [establishment] in respect of
any damages recoverable under Section 14-B or any charges payable by him
to the appropriate Government under any provision of this Act or under any of
the conditions specified 130 [under Section 17 or in respect of the contribution
payable by him towards the [Pension]131 Scheme 132 [or the Insurance
Scheme] under the said Section 17],
may, if the amount is in arrear, 133 [be recovered 134 [in the manner specified in
Sections 8-B to 8-G]].]
NOTIFICATION
S.O. 550(E), dt. 16-10-1973.—In exercise of the power conferred by Section 8 of
the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952, Shri V.S. Desika
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 36 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chari, the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, hereby authorises the Regional
Provident Fund Commissioners to exercise the powers vested in the Central Provident
Fund Commissioner under the provisions of the above said section within each of the
regions specified in the Schedule by the respective Regional Commissioners in whose
region the establishment is covered or has its Head Office.
2. This notification shall come into force on the first day of November, 1973.
SCHEDULE
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Yanam area.
2. The States of Assam, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura and Meghalaya and Union
Territories of Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh.
3. The State of Bihar.
4. The Union Territory of Delhi.
5. The State of Gujarat.
6. The State of Kerala and Union Territory of Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi
Islands.
7. The State of Madhya Pradesh.
8. The State of Maharashtra and Union Territory of Goa, Daman and Diu.
9. The State of Mysore.
10. The State of Orissa.
11. The States of Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of
Chandigarh.
12. The State of Rajasthan.
13. The State of Tamil Nadu and the Union Territory of Pondicherry.
14. The State of Uttar Pradesh.
15. The State of West Bengal and Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
► Recovery of arrears.—Arrears of provident fund contribution payable by public limited
company cannot be recovered from the Managing Director of the company since it is the company
which is the principal employer and not the Director, Vimalkumar Ravji Shah v. Employees
Provident Fund Organisation, (2009) 5 Mah LJ 209.
135
[8-A. Recovery of moneys by employers and contractors.—(1) 136 [The amount of
contribution (that is to say the employer's contribution as well as the employee's
contribution in pursuance of any Scheme and the employer's contribution in pursuance
of the Insurance Scheme)] and any charges 137 [* * *] for meeting the cost of
administering the Fund paid or payable by an employer in respect of an employee
employed by or through a contractor may be recovered by such employer from the
contractor, either by deduction from any amount payable to the contractor under any
contract or as a debt payable by the contractor.
(2) A contractor from whom the amounts mentioned in sub-section (1) may be
recovered in respect of any employee employed by or through him, may recover from
such employee the employee's contribution 138 [under any Scheme] by deduction from
the basic wages, dearness allowance and retaining allowance (if any), payable to such
employee.
(3) Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary, no contractor shall be entitled to
deduct the employer's contribution or the charges referred to in sub-section (1) from
the basic wages, dearness allowance, and retaining allowance (if any), payable to an
employee employed by or through him or otherwise to recover such contribution or
charges from such employee.
Explanation.—In this section, the expressions, “dearness allowance”, and “retaining
allowance” shall have the same meanings as in Section 6.]
► Power of employer to recover money.—The employer has been empowered by this
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 37 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
provision to recover the amount from the contractor either from the moneys payable to the
contractor or even as a debt, and therefore, an employer cannot raise any difficulty on the ground
that he cannot realise the amount from the contractor and as he does not pay wages directly to the
workers he cannot deduct it from their wages either. Malwa Vanaspati v. Provident Fund Commr.,
(1976) 1 LLJ 307 (MP).
139
[8-B. Issue of certificate to the Recovery Officer.—(1) Where any amount is in
arrear under Section 8, the authorised officer may issue, to the Recovery Officer, a
certificate under his signature specifying the amount of arrears and the Recovery
Officer, on receipt of such certificate, shall proceed to recover the amount specified
therein from the establishment or, as the case may be, the employer by one or more
of the modes mentioned below:—
(a) attachment and sale of the movable or immovable property of the
establishment or, as the case may be, the employer;
(b) arrest of the employer and his detention in prison;
(c) appointing a receiver for the management of the movable or immovable
properties of the establishment or, as the case may be, the employer:
Provided that the attachment and sale of any property under this section shall first
be effected against the properties of the establishment and where such attachment
and sale is insufficient for recovering the whole of the amount of arrears specified in
the certificate, the Recovery Officer may take such proceedings against the property of
the employer for recovery of the whole or any part of such arrears.
(2) The authorised officer may issue a certificate under sub-section (1),
notwithstanding that proceedings for recovery of the arrears by any other mode have
been taken.
8-C. Recovery Officer to whom certificate is to be forwarded.—(1) The authorised
officer may forward the certificate referred to in Section 8-B to the Recovery Officer
within whose jurisdiction the employer—
(a) carries on his business or profession or within whose jurisdiction the principal
place of his establishment is situate; or
(b) resides or any movable or immovable property of the establishment or the
employer is situate.
(2) Where an establishment or the employer has property within the jurisdiction of
more than one Recovery Officers and the Recovery Officer to whom a certificate is sent
by the authorised officer—
(a) is not able to recover the entire amount by the sale of the property, movable
or immovable, within his jurisdiction; or
(b) is of the opinion that, for the purpose of expediting or securing the recovery
of the whole or any part of the amount, it is necessary so to do,
he may send the certificate or, where only a part of the amount is to be recovered, a
copy of the certificate certified in the prescribed manner and specifying the amount to
be recovered to the Recovery Officer within whose jurisdiction the establishment or the
employer has property or the employer resides, and thereupon that Recovery Officer
shall also proceed to recover the amount due under this section as if the certificate or
the copy thereof had been the certificate sent to him by the authorised officer.
8-D. Validity of certificate and amendment thereof.—(1) When the authorised
officer issues a certificate to a Recovery Officer under Section 8-B, it shall not be open
to the employer to dispute before the Recovery Officer the correctness of the amount,
and no objection to the certificate on any other ground shall also be entertained by the
Recovery Officer.
(2) Notwithstanding the issue of a certificate to a Recovery Officer, the authorised
officer shall have power to withdraw the certificate or correct any clerical or
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 38 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so authorised and in the case of a joint account to all the joint-holders at their last
addresses known to the Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the officer so
authorised.
(iv) Save as otherwise provided in this sub-section, every person to whom a notice
is issued under this sub-section shall be bound to comply with such notice, and, in
particular, where any such notice is issued to a post office, bank or an insurer, it shall
not be necessary for any pass book, deposit receipt, policy or any other document to
be produced for the purpose of any entry, endorsement or the like being made before
payment is made notwithstanding any rule, practice or requirement to the contrary.
(v) Any claim respecting any property in relation to which a notice under this sub-
section has been issued arising after the date of the notice shall be void as against any
demand contained in the notice.
(vi) Where a person to whom a notice under this sub-section is sent objects to it by
a statement on oath that the sum demanded or any part thereof is not due to the
employer or that he does not hold any money for or on account of the employer, then,
nothing contained in this sub-section shall be deemed to require such person to pay
any such sum or part thereof, as the case may be, but if it is discovered that such
statement was false in any material particular, such person shall be personally liable to
the Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the officer so authorised to the extent of
his own liability to the employer on the date of the notice, or to the extent of the
employer's liability for any sum due under this Act, whichever is less.
(vii) The Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the officer so authorised may, at
any time or from time to time, amend or revoke any notice issued under this sub-
section or extend the time for making any payment in pursuance of such notice.
(viii) The Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the officer so authorised shall
grant a receipt for any amount paid in compliance with a notice issued under this sub-
section, and the person so paying shall be fully discharged from his liability to the
employer to the extent of the amount so paid.
(ix) Any person discharging any liability to the employer after the receipt of a notice
under this sub-section shall be personally liable to the Central Provident Fund
Commissioner or the officer so authorised to the extent of his own liability to the
employer so discharged or to the extent of the employer's liability for any sum due
under this Act, whichever is less.
(x) If the person to whom a notice under this sub-section is sent fails to make
payment in pursuance thereof to the Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the
officer so authorised he shall be deemed to be an employer in default in respect of the
amount specified in the notice and further proceedings may be taken against him for
the realisation of the amount as if it were an arrear due from him, in the manner
provided in Sections 8-B to 8-E and the notice shall have the same effect as an
attachment of a debt by the Recovery Officer in exercise of his powers under Section 8
-B.
(4) The Central Provident Fund Commissioner or the officer authorised by the
Central Board in this behalf may apply to the court in whose custody there is money
belonging to the employer for payment to him of the entire amount of such money, or
if it is more than the amount due, an amount sufficient to discharge the amount due.
(5) The Central Provident Fund Commissioner or any officer not below the rank of
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner may, if so authorised by the Central
Government by general or special order, recover any arrears of amount due from an
employer or, as the case may be, from the establishment by distraint and sale of his or
its movable property in the manner laid down in the Third Schedule to the Income Tax
Act, 1961.
8-G. Application of certain provisions of Income Tax Act.—The provisions of the
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 40 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second and Third Schedules to the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and the
Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962, as in force from time to time, shall
apply with necessary modifications as if the said provisions and the rules referred to
the arrears of the amount mentioned in Section 8 of this Act instead of to the income
tax:
Provided that any reference in the said provisions and the rules to the “assessee”
shall be construed as a reference to an employer as defined in this Act.]
9. Fund to be recognised under Act 11 of 1922.—For the purposes of the Indian
Income Tax Act, 1922, the Fund shall be deemed to be a recognised provident fund
within the meaning of Chapter IX-A of that Act:
140 [Provided that nothing contained in the said Chapter shall operate to render
ineffective any provision of the Scheme (under which the Fund is established) which is
repugnant to any of the provisions of that Chapter or of the rules made thereunder.]
10. Protection against attachment.—(1) The amount standing to the credit of any
member in the Fund 141 [or of any exempted employee in a provident fund] shall not in
any way be capable of being assigned or charged and shall not be liable to attachment
under any decree or order of any Court in respect of any debt or liability incurred by
the member 142 [or the exempted employee], and neither the official assignee
appointed under the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, nor any receiver
appointed under the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, shall be entitled to, or have any
claim on, any such amount.
143
[(2) Any amount standing to the credit of a member in the Fund or of an
exempted employee in a provident fund at the time of his death and payable to his
nominee under the Scheme or the rules of the provident fund shall, subject to any
deduction authorised by the said Scheme or rules, vest in the nominee and shall be
free from any debt or other liability incurred by the deceased or the nominee before
the death of the member or of the exempted employee 144 [and shall also not be liable
to attachment under any decree or order of any Court].]
145 [(3) The provisions of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) shall, so far as may be,
apply in relation to the [Pension]146 or any other amount payable under the [Pension]
147 Scheme 148 [and also in relation to any amount payable under the Insurance
Scheme] as they apply in relation to any amount payable out of the Fund.]
11. Priority of payment of contributions over other debts.—149 [(1)] 150 [Where any
employer is adjudicated insolvent or, being a company, an order for winding up is
made, the amount due—
(a) from the employer in relation to 151 [an establishment] to which any 152
[Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] applies in respect of any contribution
payable to the Fund 153 [or, as the case may be, the Insurance Fund], damages
recoverable under Section 14-B, accumulations required to be transferred
under sub-section (2) of Section 15 or any charges payable by him under any
other provision of this Act or of any provision of the 154 [Scheme or the
Insurance Scheme]; or
(b) from the employer in relation to an exempted 155 [establishment] in respect of
any contribution to 156 [the Provident Fund or any Insurance Fund] (in so far as
it relates to exempted employees), under the rules of 157 [the Provident Fund
or any Insurance Fund] 158 [any contribution payable by him towards the
[Pension]159 Fund under sub-section (6) of Section 17,] damages recoverable
under Section 14-B or any charges payable by him to the appropriate
Government under any provision of this Act or under any of the conditions
specified under Section 17,
shall, where the liability therefor has accrued before the order of adjudication or
winding up is made, be deemed to be included] among the debts which under Section
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 41 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
49 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, or under Section 61 of the Provincial
Insolvency Act, 1920 or under 160 [Section 530 of the Companies Act, 1956], are to be
paid in priority to all other debts in the distribution of the property of the insolvent or
the assets of the company being wound up, as the case may be.
161
[Explanation.—In this sub-section and in Section 17, ‘insurance fund’ means any
fund established by an employer under any scheme for providing benefits in the
nature of life insurance to employees, whether linked to their deposits in provident
fund or not, without payment by the employees of any separate contribution or
premium in that behalf.]
162 [(2) Without prejudice to the provisions of sub-section (1), if any amount is due
► Any amount due from an employer.—The expression “any amount due from an employer”
appearing in Section 11(2) has to be interpreted keeping in view the object of the Act and other
provision contained therein including Section 11(1) and Sections 7-A, 7-Q, 14-B and 15(2). Section
11(2) was inserted in Section 11 by Amendment Act 40 of 1973 with a view to ensure that payment
of provident fund dues of the workers are not defeated by the prior claims of secured and/or of
unsecured creditors. While enacting Section 11(2), the legislature was conscious of the fact that in
terms of the existing Section 11 priority had been given to the amount due from an employer in
relation to an establishment to which any scheme or fund was applicable including damages
recoverable damages recoverable under Section 14-B and accumulations required to be transferred
under Section 15(2). The legislature was also aware that in case of delay the employer was
statutorily responsible to pay interest in terms of Section 17. Therefore, there is no plausible reason
to give a restricted meaning to the expression “any amount due from the employer” and confine it to
the amount determined under Section 7-A or the contribution payable under Section 8. Any
interpretation to the contrary would frustrate the object of introducing the deeming provision and non
obstante clause in Section 11(2), Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Provident Fund
Commr., (2009) 10 SCC 123 : (2009) 2 SCC (L&S) 743.
164 [12. Employer not to reduce wages, etc.—No employer in relation to 165 [an
establishment] to which any 166 [Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] applies shall, by
reason only of his liability for the payment of any contribution to 167 [the Fund or the
Insurance Fund] or any charges under this Act or the 168 [Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme], reduce, whether directly or indirectly, the wages of any employee to whom
the 169 [Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] applies or the total quantum of benefits in
the nature of old age pension, gratuity 170 [, provident fund or life insurance] to which
the employee is entitled under the terms of his employment, express or implied.]
► Trust deed.—Section 12 overrides the regulations framed under a trust deed. Som Prakash
Rekhi v. Union of India, (1981) 1 SCC 449.
► Rate of contribution.—After the coverage of the establishment by the Act a higher rate of
contribution to the provident fund prescribed by an earlier scheme cannot be reduced by the
employer, to the statutory rate. R.P.F. Commr. v. Harihar Polyfibres, (1992) 2 LLJ 761 : 1992 Lab
IC 202 : (1992) 1 Cur LR 517 (Kant)(DB) reversing Harihar Polyfibres v. R.P.F. Commr., (1991) 2
LLJ 477 : (1990) 1 LLN 221 (Kant).
► Entitlement of Provident Fund.—There is no entitlement of Provident Fund over and above
that provided under EPF Act, Marathwada Gramin Bank Karamchari Sanghatana v. Marathwada
Gramin Bank, (2011) 9 SCC 620 : (2011) 2 SCC (L&S) 562.
13. Inspectors.—(1) The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official
Gazette, appoint such persons as it thinks fit to be Inspectors for the purposes of this
Act 171 [, the Scheme 172 [, the [Pension]173 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme]], and
may define their jurisdiction.
(2) Any Inspector appointed under sub-section (1) may, for the purpose of
inquiring into the correctness of any information furnished in connection with this Act
or with any 174 [Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] or for the purpose of ascertaining
whether any of the provisions of this Act or of any 175 [Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme] have been complied with 176 [in respect of 177 [an establishment] to which any
178
[Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] applies or for the purpose of ascertaining
whether the provisions of this Act or any 179 [Scheme or the Insurance Scheme] are
applicable to any 180 [establishment] to which the 181 [Scheme or the Insurance
Scheme] has not been applied or for the purpose of determining whether the
conditions subject to which exemption was granted under Section 17 are being
complied with by the employer in relation to an exempted 182 [establishment]]—
(a) require an employer 183 [or any contractor from whom any amount is
recoverable under Section 8-A] to furnish such information as he may consider
necessary 184 [* * *];
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 43 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) at any reasonable time 185 [and with such assistance, if any, as he may think
fit, enter and search] any 186 [establishment] or any premises connected
therewith and require any one found in charge thereof to produce before him
for examination any accounts, books, registers and other documents relating
to the employment of persons or the payment of wages in the 187
[establishment];
(c) examine, with respect to any matter relevant to any of the purposes
aforesaid, the employer 188 [or any contractor from whom any amount is
recoverable under Section 8-A], his agent or servant or any other person
found in charge of the 189 [establishment] or any premises connected therewith
or whom the Inspector has reasonable cause to believe to be or to have been,
an employee in the 190 [establishment];
191 [(d)
make copies of or take extracts from, any book, register or other
document maintained in relation to the establishment and, where he has
reason to believe that any offence under this Act has been committed by an
employer, seize with such assistance as he may think fit, such book, register
or other document or portions thereof as he may consider relevant in respect
of that offence;]
(e) exercise such other powers as the [Scheme or the Insurance Scheme]192 may
provide.
193 [(2-A) Any Inspector appointed under sub-section (1) may, for the purpose of
inquiring into the correctness of any information furnished in connection with the
[Pension]194 Scheme or for the purpose of ascertaining whether any of the provisions
of this Act or of the [Pension]195 Scheme have been complied with in respect of an
establishment to which the [Pension]196 Scheme applies, exercise all or any of the
powers conferred on him under clause (a), clause (b), clause (c) or clause (d) of sub-
section (2).]
197 [(2-B) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898,198 shall, so far as
may be, apply to any search or seizure under sub-section (2) 199 [or under sub-section
(2-A), as the case may be] as they apply to any search or seizure made under the
authority of a warrant issued under Section 98200 of the said Code.]
(3) 201 [* * *]
NOTIFICATION
APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS
S.O. 35024/1/88-SS II, dt. 19-1-1989.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (1-A) of Section 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974),
the Central Government hereby appoints all the Inspectors appointed under sub-
section (1) of Section 13 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), as Assistant Public Prosecutors for the purpose of
conducting of cases within their respective jurisdiction, arising out of the Employees'
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), and the
Schemes framed thereunder in the Courts of Magistrates.
14. Penalties.—(1) Whoever, for the purpose of avoiding any payment to be made
by himself under this Act 202 [, the Scheme 203 [, the [Pension]204 Scheme or the
Insurance Scheme]] or of enabling any other person to avoid such payment knowingly
makes or causes to be made any false statement or false representation shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 205 [one year, or with
fine of five thousand rupees, or with both].
206 [(1-A) An employer who contravenes, or makes default in complying with, the
imprisonment for a term which may extend to 207 [three years] but—
(a) which shall not be less than 208 [one year and a fine of ten thousand rupees]
in case of default in payment of the employees' contribution which has been
deducted by the employer from the employees' wages;
209
[(b) which shall not be less than six months and a fine of five thousand
rupees, in any other case : ]
210
[* * *]
Provided that the court may, for any adequate and special reasons to be recorded in
the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a lesser term 211 [* * *].
212 [(1-B) An employer who contravenes, or makes default in complying with the
this Act or of any condition subject to which exemption was granted under Section 17
shall, if no other penalty is elsewhere provided by or under this Act for such
contravention or non-compliance, be punishable with imprisonment which may extend
to 222 [six months, but which shall not be less than one month, and shall also be liable
to fine which may extend to five thousand rupees].]
(3) 223 [* * *]
► Proof of offence.—On a plain language of Section 14(1) it is seen that there is an element of
mens rea and therefore, the burden is on the authority prosecuting the person to prove the offence.
S.H. Salve Kadam & Co. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1981 Lab IC 568 (Kar HC).
For an offence under Section 14(1-A) mens rea is not an essential element. P.F. Inspector v.
Ram Kumar, 1983 Lab IC 717 (P&H HC).
► Non-payment of employer's contribution.—Continued non-payment of employer's
contribution under the Act after the due date is a continuing offence. Bhagirath Kanoria v. State of
M.P., (1984) 4 SCC 222 : 1985 SCC (L&S) 30.
Non-payment of contribution of provident fund by an establishment exempted under Section 17,
as per its own rules would attract penal provisions of sub-sections (1-A) and (2-A) of Section 14.
N.K. Jain v. C.K. Shah, (1991) 2 SCC 495 : 1991 SCC (Cri) 328 : 1991 SCC (L&S) 656.
Where the allegation is only for non-payment of contribution and administrative charges,
payment is to be made locally and not to the office of the P.F. Commissioner. D.K. Bhattacharjee v.
Chandidas Chitra Mandir, 1982 Lab IC 899 (Cal HC).
► Limitation, Computation of.—Non-payment of employer's contribution to Provident Fund is
a continuing offence and as such there is no period of limitation to take cognizance of the offence.
K.M. Shivarama v. K.C. Purushothama, (1999) 2 LLJ 1063 : 1999 LLR 1207 : (2000) 84 FLR 387
(Karn).
► Imposition of penalty.—Merely stating that the accused-respondent was old and infirm but
yet looking after the concern would not be the kind of special and adequate reason to impose a
penalty less than the minimum which the legislature contemplates. Union of India v. Mohd. Ahmed,
1978 Lab IC 1026 (Del).
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 45 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No amount of subsequent payment after the default, whether by arrangement or otherwise, would
wipe out the offence. Ramjhora Tea Co. Ltd. v. G.P. Sinha, (1993) 1 LLN 840 : (1993) 66 FLR
1033 (Cal).
Cancellation of exemption under Section 17(4) does not amount to a penalty within the meaning
of Section 14(2-A). N.K. Jain v. C.K. Shah, (1991) 2 SCC 495 : 1991 SCC (Cri) 328 : 1991 SCC
(L&S) 656.
224 [14-A. Offences by companies.—(1) If the person committing an offence under
this Act 225 [, the Scheme or 226 [the [Pension]227 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme]] is
a company, every person, who at the time the offence was committed was in charge
of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the
company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and
shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person
liable to any punishment, if he proves that the offence was committed without his
knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such
offence.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where an offence under
this Act 228 [, the Scheme or 229 [the [Pension]230 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme]]
has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been
committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the
part of, any director or manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such
director, manager, secretary or other officer shall be deemed to be guilty of that
offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section,—
(i) “company” means any body corporate and includes a firm and other
association of individuals; and
(ii) “director”, in relation to a firm means a partner in the firm.
► Limitation period for complaint.—As there is special provision in Section 470(3) CrPC,
1973 for exclusion of the period required for obtaining sanction and as in the Explanation it has
been clearly stated that the date on which the application is made for obtaining consent or sanction
and the date of receipt of the order of the Government or other authority shall both be excluded.
Ground of complaint—Complaint on the ground that the accused at all material time was the person
in charge of the establishment and was responsible to it for the conduct of its business, is not
sufficient to connect the accused with the alleged offence. K.N. Genda v. State, 1982 Lab IC 1777.
► Facts to be stated in complaint.—It is not enough to make a bald allegation in the complaint
borrowing the language of the section, to attract Section 14-A(2). The facts essential to constitute
the offence attracting Section 14-A(2) have to be stated, without which the prosecution launched
and cognizance taken by the Magistrate would be improper. Anantaramaiah Woollen Factory v.
State, (1980) 57 FJR 407 (Kar HC) : 1981 Lab IC 538.
► Liability to get prosecuted.—Only such manager, secretary or other officer of the company
or establishment who is in charge of management of the affairs of the establishment or contributes
to the commission of the offence by consent or connivance or neglect is liable to be prosecuted.
Anantaramaiah Woollen Factory v. State, (1980) 57 FJR 407 (Kar HC) : 1981 Lab IC 538.
The expression “employer” as defined in Section 2(e) and the expression “person in charge of,
and responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company” in Section 14-A
are distinct and different, and a person cannot be prosecuted for non-compliance with Section 17
(3) merely because he has been described as a person in charge of, and responsible to the
company for the conduct of its business. K.L. Jalan v. State of W.B., (1993) 67 FLR 195 : (1993) 2
LLN 100 : (1994) 1 LLJ 224 (Cal).
A director of a company included in the declaration under Columns 8 and 11 of Form 5-A (under
Para 36-A of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952) as one of the persons in charge of
and responsible for the conduct of the business of the establishment, can be prosecuted for non-
compliance with the provisions of the Act and the scheme in not depositing the contribution.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 46 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Srikanta Datta Narsimharaja v. Enforcement Officer, (1993) 3 SCC 217 : 1993 SCC (L&S) 751
upholding Srikanta Datta Narsimharaja Wodiyar v. Enforcement Officer, (1992) 2 CLR 715 (Kant).
Directors of a company, deemed to have committed any offence under Section 14-A(1), cannot
be granted relief under Section 633 of the Companies Act, 1956. Rabindra Chamria v. Registrar of
Companies, 1992 Supp (2) SCC 10.
The Penal Code, save and except some provisions specifically providing therefor, does not
contemplate any vicarious liability on the part of a party who is not charged directly for commission
of an offence. The provisions of the Essential Commodities Act, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, etc. have created such
vicarious liability. In terms of the Explanations appended to Section 405 of the Penal Code, a legal
fiction has been created to the effect that the employer shall be deemed to have committed an
offence of criminal breach of trust. Whereas a person in charge of the affairs of the Company and
in control thereof has been made vicariously liable for the offence committed by the Company along
with the Company but even in a case falling under Section 406 IPC vicarious liability has been held
to be not extendable to the Directors or officers of the Company. S.K. Alagh v. State of U.P., (2008)
5 SCC 662.
231 [14-AA. Enhanced punishment in certain cases after previous conviction.—
Whoever, having been convicted by a court of an offence punishable under this Act,
the Scheme or 232 [the [Pension]233 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme], commits the
same offence shall be subject for every such subsequent offence to imprisonment for a
term which may extend to 234 [five years, but which shall not be less than two years,
and shall also be liable to a fine of twenty-five thousand rupees].
► Prospective operation.—Sections 14(1-A) & 14-AA, are not retrospective. Dwijendra Nath
Singha v. State, 1978 Lab IC 1420 (Cal).
235 14-AB. Certain offences to be cognizable.—Notwithstanding anything contained
any offence punishable under this Act, the Scheme or 237 [the [Pension]238 Scheme or
the Insurance Scheme], except on a report in writing of the facts constituting such
offence made with the previous sanction of the Central Provident Fund Commissioner
or such other officer as may be authorised by the Central Government, by notification
in the Official Gazette, in this behalf, by an Inspector appointed under Section 13.
(2) No court inferior to that of a Presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of the first
class shall try any offence under this Act or the Scheme or 239 [the [Pension]240 Scheme
or the Insurance Scheme].]
NOTIFICATION
S.O. 549(E), dt. Oct. 16, 1973.—In exercise of the powers conferred by Section
14-AC of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 and in
supersession of all previous notifications on the subject, the Central Government
hereby authorises that the powers vested in the Central Provident Fund Commissioner
under the provisions of the above said section shall also be exercisable within each of
the regions specified in the Schedule by the respective Regional Provident Fund
Commissioners in whose region the establishment is covered or has its Head Office.
This notification shall come into force on the first day of November, 1973.
► Petition of complaint.—The petition of complaint need not in detail plead any and every
minuscule fact or the evidence. R.K. Prasad v. State of Bihar, (1986) 2 LLN 305 (Pat)(FB).
► Non-application of mind.—Mere preferring a complaint in stereotyped printed forms is not
indicative of non-application of mind to the facts of the case. R.K. Prasad v. State of Bihar, (1986)
2 LLN 305 (Pat)(FB).
► Sanction for prosecution.—Omission to bring to the notice of the sanctioning authority that
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 47 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
instalments had been fixed by the Commissioner and in accordance therewith, the defaulter-
employer had paid a substantial amount, held, vitiated the sanction for prosecution. Ramjhora Tea
Co. Ltd. v. G.P. Sinha, (1993) 1 LLN 840 : (1993) 66 FLR 1033 (Cal).
► Relief.—A circular from the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, providing for recovery of
arrears of EPF in instalments cannot be a basis for grant of relief by courts in prosecution for non-
payment of administrative charges under para 38(1) of the EPF Scheme, 1952. Andhra Sinters Ltd.
v. Provident Fund Inspector, 1993 Lab IC 2346 : (1994) 1 LLJ 1171 : (1994) 68 FLR 983 (AP).
► Summary trial.—Offences under the Act should not be tried summarily even if the accused
desires to plead guilty. State of Maharashtra v. Shivprakash Seth, 1993 Lab IC 1797 (Bom).
241
[14-B. Power to recover damages.—Where an employer makes default in the
payment of any contribution to the Fund 242 [, the [Pension]243 Fund or the Insurance
Fund] or in the transfer of accumulations required to be transferred by him under sub-
section (2) of Section 15 [or sub-section (5) of Section 17]244 or in the payment of any
charges payable under any other provision of this Act or of [any Scheme or Insurance
Scheme]245 or under any of the conditions specified under Section 17, 246 [the Central
Provident Fund Commissioner or such other officer as may be authorised by the
Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, in this behalf] may recover
247
[from the employer by way of penalty such damages, not exceeding the amount of
arrears, as may be specified in the Scheme : ]
248 [Provided that before levying and recovering such damages, the employer shall
Section 14-B requires application of mind by the authority. Karnataka Agro Industries Corpn.
Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1979 Lab IC 72 (Kar).
The authority under the Act has discretion to mitigate damages depending upon the
circumstances of the case but never a discretion to condone the delay; damages in rare cases can
be nil percentage but failure to pay will always attract Section 14-B. Calicut Modern Spg. & Wvg.
Mills Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1982) 1 LLJ 440 (Ker HC) : 1982 Lab IC 1422. Various administrative
orders authorise the review of an order of levy of damages. Virendra Prosad v. Union of India,
(1986) 2 LLN 1069 : 1986 Lab IC 1961.
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner can reduce but cannot totally waive the penalty. R.P.F.
Commr. v. S.D. College, (1997) 1 SCC 241 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 449.
► Speaking order.—An order under Section 14-B must be a speaking order. R.P.F. Commr.
v. Taylor Instrument Company of India, (1993) 1 LLN 933 : (1994) 1 LLJ 1007 : (1993) 66 FLR 870
(P&H)(DB)
A non-speaking order imposing exemplary damages is invalid. The defect cannot be cured by
supplying reasons in the counter-affidavit. Cannanore Shop v. R.P.F. Commr., 1992 Lab IC 2477 :
(1992) 2 CLR 305 : (1992) 65 FLR 714 (Ker).
► Default in payment of contribution.—The loss is presumed by the legislature when the
employer makes the default in payment of contribution and therefore, no loss is to be proved.
Quantum of loss only has to be determined by the Government before damages are levied and
recovered. Atlantic Engg. Service v. Union of India, 1979 Lab IC 695 (Del).
Section 14-B—So long as the employer has remitted its contribution to the provident fund
through cheque within the time fixed in the Scheme, whatever may be the actual date on which the
amount is actually remitted to the fund on account of delay by the Bank or postal department, no
penalty can be imposed on the employer. Indian Process Chemical Laboratory (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F.
Commr., 1979 Lab IC 84 (Kar).
Section 14-B, applies to employers of exempted establishments also. Hence in cases of default
in payment of contribution to provident fund, proceedings for recovery of damages can be initiated
against employees of such exempted establishments. This is clear from deeming provision contained
in second part of Section 17(1-A)(a). As definition of “fund” would apply to a scheme operating in
an exempted establishment, default in payment of contribution to such scheme would attract Section
14-B. Expression “so far as may be” in Section 17(1-A)(a) does not limit scope of the provision.
Section 17 (1-A)(a), being a remedial or social welfare provision, should be construed as a whole
with a purposive and social justice oriented approach, Regl. Provident Fund Commr. v. Hooghly
Mills Co. Ltd., (2012) 2 SCC 489.
Where the default was detected twelve years after delegation of powers to the Commissioner
while the State concerned had as many as over 22,000 establishments and only one empowered
Commissioner, order levying damages passed by him 1½ years later, held, did not vitiate the order.
R.P.F. Commr. v. K.T. Rolling Mills (P) Ltd., (1995) 1 SCC 181 : 1995 SCC (L&S) 272 reversing
R.M. Gandhi v. K.T. Rolling Mills, (1994) 2 LLN 970 : (1994) 1 CLR 631 : (1994) 68 FLR 1149
(Bom)(DB).
Merely because the petitioner even bona fidely was contesting that the provisions of the Act were
not applicable, it would not absolve the petitioner from liability to deposit the contribution under the
Act created for the welfare of employees. Gram Sewa Samiti v. Regional Commr., E.P.F., Indore,
(1997) 2 LLJ 1202 : (1997) 76 FLR 573 (MP).
Action under Section 14-B should be taken within a reasonable time but delay in such action
would not amount to waiver of the right. H.P. Agro Industries Corpn. Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1984
Lab IC 1286 : (1993) 2 CLR 505 : (1994) 2 LLN 715 (HP)(DB). But see Orissa Forest Development
Corpn. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1994 Lab IC 2510 (Ori)(DB).
► Imposition of damages for default in payment.—Since presence or absence of mens rea
and/or actual reus would be a determinative factor in imposing damages under Section 14-B, High
Court or appellate authority or original authority having found no mens rea and/or actus reus,
respondent(s) could not be held liable under Section 14-B, Provident Fund Commissioner v. RSL
Textiles (India) (P) Ltd., (2017) 3 SCC 110 : (2017) 1 SCC (L&S) 543.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 49 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
► Notice.—Separate notices are not contemplated under Section 14-B for each of the
accumulative defaults. Udaipur Sahkari Upbhokta Thok Bhandar v. Union of India, 1981 Lab IC 285
(Raj).
The show-cause notice is not a ministerial act. It is to be given by an authority which is entitled to
levy damages after taking into consideration the facts of the case. H.R. Gandhi v. State of Haryana,
(1981) 59 FJR 274 (P&H HC).
► Delay.—Plea of delay of 14 years in recovering damages for late payment of EPF
contributions will not be sustainable. Hindustan Times Ltd. v. Union of India, (1998) 2 SCC 242.
Inordinate delay by EPF authorities to levy damages and penalty for late payment will not be
sustainable. Orissa Forest Development Corpn. Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1995) 1 CLR 1116 (Ori)
(DB).
Section 14-B does not prescribe any period of limitation for levy or recovery of damages for
committing default in making the deposit of provident fund dues. Shyam Glass Works v. State of
U.P., AIR 1979 All 19 : 1979 Lab IC 27; A.P. Products (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1987) 1 LLN
659 (P&H); Mathur Alloy Steels (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (1993) 2 LLJ 471 (Bom). However, on
the facts and circumstances of the case the issuance of the show-cause notice should not be
beyond reasonable time. Gandhidham Spg. & Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1987) 1 LLN 813
(Guj)(DB) : 1987 Lab IC 659. See also Cosmos India Rubber Works v. R.P.F. Commr., (1986) 2
LLN 668 (Bom). Although delay in issuing show-cause notice cannot by itself vitiate the proceedings
for levying damages, it may in certain cases, such as those under Paras 32-A and 32-B of the
Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, give room for considering the levy of damages at less than
the minimum rates. Mathur Alloy Steels (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, (1993) 2 LLN 912 : (1993) 67
FLR 1028 : 1993 Lab IC 1707 (Bom).
Where order for levying damages passed after the delay of 6 to 10 years, but it caused no
irretrievable prejudice to the employer, held, not vitiative of the order. K. Streetlite Electric Corpn. v.
R.P.F. Commr., (2001) 4 SCC 449.
Proceeding for levy of damages initiated after an unexplained delay of 10 to 13 years was held to
be bad and set aside in National Marketing Corpn. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1994) 1 LLN 544 : (1994) 2
LLJ 1177 : (1994) 1 CLR 322 (Bom).
Damages should be levied within a reasonable time. Its levy after a lapse of more than about
1 1/2 decades from the date of first default is bad and illegal. Aditya Agro Industries (P) Ltd. v.
R.P.F. Commr., (1997) 2 LLN 271 (Mad).
► Punitive damages — Transferability of.—Imposition of punitive damages is quasi-criminal
in character that can be resorted to even in civil proceedings to deter wilful wrongdoing by
wrongdoer. Further held, Sections 14, 14-A, 14-AA, 14-AB, 14-AC call for criminal prosecution
while Section 14-B contemplates recovery of penalty by way of damages and is complete in itself.
Thus, held, imposition of penalty under Section 14-B does not amount to criminal prosecution in
context of transfer of establishment from one management to another, Mcleod Russel India Ltd. v.
Regl. Provident Fund Commr., (2014) 15 SCC 263 : (2015) 3 SCC (L&S) 593.
► Imposition of damages.—Mens rea/actus reus is determining factor for imposing and
quantifying damages under Section 14-B. Further held, imposition of damages under Section 14-B
implies that mens rea/actus reus was prevailing at relevant time, Mcleod Russel India Ltd. v. Regl.
Provident Fund Commr., (2014) 15 SCC 263 : (2015) 3 SCC (L&S) 593.
► Liability for damages.—Inter se covenants between erstwhile owners and transferee, do not
absolve transferee from payment of damages imposed by statute on previous owner. So where
damages are imposed under Section 14-B the same would be recoverable jointly and severally from
the erstwhile as well as the current managements, Mcleod Russel India Ltd. v. Regl. Provident Fund
Commr., (2014) 15 SCC 263 : (2015) 3 SCC (L&S) 593.
251 [14-C. Power of Court to make orders.—(1) Where an employer is convicted of an
offence of making default in the payment of any contribution to the Fund 252 [, the
[Pension]253 Fund or the Insurance Fund] or in the transfer of accumulations required
to be transferred by him under sub-section (2) of Section 15 or sub-section (5) of
Section 17, the Court may, in addition to awarding any punishment, by order in
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 51 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
writing require him within a period specified in the order (which the Court may, if it
thinks fit and on application in that behalf, from time to time, extend), to pay the
amount of contribution or transfer the accumulations, as the case may be, in respect
of which the offence was committed.
(2) Where an order is made under sub-section (1), the employer shall not be liable
under this Act in respect of the continuation of the offence during the period or
extended period, if any, allowed by the Court, but if, on the expiry of such period or
extended period, as the case may be, the order of the Court has not been fully
complied with, the employer shall be deemed to have committed a further offence and
shall be punished with imprisonment in respect thereof under Section 14 and shall
also be liable to pay fine which may extend to one hundred rupees for every day after
such expiry on which the order has not been complied with.]
15. Special provisions relating to existing provident funds.—(1) 254 [Subject to the
provisions of Section 17, every employee who is a subscriber to any provident fund of
255 [an establishment] to which this Act applies shall, pending the application of a
subject to such conditions as may be specified in the notification, exempt 267 [whether
prospectively or retrospectively] that class of 268 [establishments] from the operation of
this Act for such period as may be specified in the notification.]
NOTIFICATIONS
(1)
S.O. 753, dated February 12, 1986.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby exempts all
departmental undertakings under the State Governments of Himachal Pradesh and
Punjab whose employees are in receipt of provident fund and pension benefits as
admissible under the Government rules, as a class, from the operation of the
provisions of the said Act for a period of three years with effect from the 1st March,
1986.
(2)
S.O. 868, dated February 17, 1986.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), and in continuation of the notification of the late
Ministry of Labour and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour) No. S.O. 34(E), dated
the 20th January, 1983 published in 1983 CCL-III-121 §[79], the Central Government
hereby exempts all departmental undertakings under the Central Government whose
employees are in receipt of provident fund and pension benefits as admissible under
the Government rules as a class, from the operation of the provisions of the said Act
for a further period of three years with effect from the 20th January, 1986.
(3)
S.O. 2432, dated 26th August, 1987.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), and in continuation of the notification of the
Government of India in the late Ministry of Labour and Rehabilitation (Department of
Labour) S.O. No. 2911 dated the 21st August, 1984, the Central Government after
having regard to the circumstances of the case, is of the opinion that it is expedient so
to do, hereby exempts the following classes of establishments from the operation of
the Act for a further period of three years with effect from 1st November, 1987,
subject to the conditions specified therein, namely:—
THE SCHEDULE
PARTICULARS OF ESTABLISHMENTS
1. All establishments (including universities) which have been set up under either
an Act of Parliament or of State Legislature and whose employees are in receipt of
contributory provident fund, Family Pension and deposit-linked insurance or non-
contributory provident fund, pension and deposit-linked insurance in accordance with
the rules or regulations framed under the respective Acts.
2. All educational institutions, whose employees are in receipt of contributory
provident fund, Family Pension and deposit linked insurance or non-contributory
provident fund pension and deposit linked insurance at par with the State/Central
Government employees.
3. All establishments, which are registered as ‘Society’ under the Societies
Registration Act, 1960 and whose employees are in receipt of contributory provident
fund, Family Pension and deposit linked insurance or non-contributory provident fund,
pension and deposit linked insurance at par with State/Central Government
employees.
(4)
S.O. 1957, dated 24th June, 1991.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 53 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
employees are in receipt of contributory provident fund, Family Pension and deposit-
linked insurance at par with benefits available under the Schemes framed under the
Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as amended from
time to time.
(6)
S.O. 664, dated 23-2-1989 (as extended by S.O. 189 dated 5-1-1993).—In
exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees'
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central
Government, after having regard to the circumstances of the case, is of the opinion
that it is expedient to do, hereby exempts “voluntary organisations registered under
the Societies Registration Act, 1860, or any other law for the time being in force in any
State and engaged in leprosy eradication programme” as a class, from the operation of
the said Act, for a period of three years with effect from the date of publication of this
notification in the Official Gazette. [Extended for another three years w.e.f. 8-4-1992
by S.O. 189 dt. 5-1-1993]
(7)
S.O. 2381, dated 8th September, 1989.—In exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) the Central Government being of opinion that
having regard to the circumstances of certain establishments registered under the
Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any other law for the time
being in force in any State relating to registration of societies which are being run
mainly on grants-in-aid received from the Central Government or the State
Governments, it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby exempts the said class of
establishments from the operation of the first mentioned Act for a period of five years
with effect from the date of publication of this notification in the Official Gazette
subject to the condition that such grants-in-aid do not include any amount for the
purpose of meeting the liability of the employer towards the employer's contribution to
the Provident Fund.
(8)
S.O. 3536, dated December 6, 1994.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub
-section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) and in continuation of the Notification of the
Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 2381 dated 8-9-1989, the
Central Government being of opinion that having regard to the circumstances of
certain establishments registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860
(21 of 1860) or under any other law for the time being in force in any State relating to
registration of societies which are being run mainly on grants-in-aid received from the
Central Government or the State Governments, it is necessary and expedient so to do,
hereby exempts the said class of establishments from the operation of the first
mentioned Act for a further period of one year with effect from the 22nd September,
1994 subject to the condition that such grants-in-aid do not include any amount for
the purpose of meeting the liability of the employer towards the employer's
contribution to the Provident Fund.
(9)
S.O. 3231, dated 21st Nov, 1995.—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (2) of Section 16 of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) and in continuation of the Notification of the
Government of India in the Ministry of Labour S.O. No. 3536 dated the Sixth
December, 1994, the Central Government being of opinion that having regard to the
circumstances of certain establishments registered under the Societies Registration
Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any other law for the time being in force in any State
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 55 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
affected by a mere change in the name of the owner. Surely no one can be allowed to evade the law
by purporting to deal with only the buildings and equipment of a factory when in fact what is dealt
with is the factory as a running concern. Kunnath Textiles v. R.P.F. Commr., 1958 Ker LJ 631 :
1958 KLT 376 : (1959) 15 FJR 63 : (1959) 2 Lab LJ 510 : AIR 1959 Ker 3. See also Nazeena
Traders (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., (1966) 1 LLJ 334.
► Change of partnership.—Merely because the partnership has changed, it can never be said
that a new business has come into existence, P.G. Textile Mills v. Union of India, (1976) 1 LLJ 312
(Guj).
► Infant Factory—Calculation of period.—Where a factory starts its work on a trial basis of
electroplating articles brought to it for that purpose, and real production starts on a later date then
the work of electroplating articles for this subsequent use or disposal is a manufacturing process.
And in the absence of any particulars, the trial period should not be excluded in determining the
date upon which the factory was established. R.P.F. Commr. v. Great Eastern Electroplator Ltd.,
1958 All WR 746 : (1958) 2 LLJ 676 : AIR 1959 All 133.
► Infancy period of 5 years to be calculated when.—The word ‘is’ in the sub-section clearly
indicates a newly started business, and the words ‘has been’, a business which has been in
existence before. The period of infancy must be calculated from the first establishment of the factory
and not from the moment of time when the figure of 20 or more is first reached. State of Punjab v.
Satpal, (1969) 3 SCC 910.
► Branch—No infancy protection.—When a parent establishment opens branches, the said
branches are not entitled to infancy protection for the simple reason that there is functional
integrality between the parent establishment and its branch or branches. The fact that the branch
was separately registered under Companies Act would not make any difference. U.P. Hotels Ltd. v.
State of Rajasthan, (1999) 2 LLN 597 (Raj).
► Provident fund-Infancy exemption-Denial of.—The benefit of infancy period which had
already accrued to the existing establishments cannot be denied merely because there had been
amendment to the provision related to the period of infancy in the said Act. Om Sai Hotel and
Restaurants v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, 2004 Lab IC 235 (Bom).
► Provident Fund-Infancy exemption-Benefit of.—Unless the provision enforcing the
amendment to Section 16(1)(d) of the said Act, either expressly or impliedly disclose the
retrospective application of the amended provision of law, the benefit of infancy period which had
already accrued to the existing establishments cannot be denied merely because there had been
amendment to the provision related to the period of infancy in the said Act. Om Sai Hotels and
Restaurants v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, 2004 Lab IC 235 (Bom).
► Whether a new establishment.—The test is to find out whether on the entire complex of
facts of a case, it can be concluded that the original legal entity, the establishment, has come to an
end and has been succeeded by a fresh legal entity. Sri Balaji Enterprise v. Dy. R.P.F. Commr.,
(1980) 56 FJR 26 (Mad HC) : (1980) 2 LLJ 380 : 1980 Lab IC 571.
Section 16(1)(b)—Printing press covered by the Act purchased by a person when that was
under liquidation—Petitioner purchasing machineries etc. of the press from that person and starting
his new press with new workers, held, entitled to infancy protection. Kubera Press v. R.P.F.
Commr., (1968) 2 LLJ 799 (Mad) : 1968 Lab IC 1570 : 34 FJR 160.
Section 16(1)(b)—After genuine and bona fide dissolution of firm, new firm coming into
existence—Held, the new firm entitled to infancy protection. S.V. Palanimalai v. R.P.F. Commr.,
(1971) 1 LLJ 44 (Mys).
See also P. Nayarayanan Nair v. R.P.F. Commr., (1973) 1 LLJ 236 (Ker) : 1973 Lab IC 1474.
Section 16(1)(b)—If a going concern was taken over or purchased by another person, it could
not be treated as a new establishment. The Provident Fund Act being a beneficent statute and
Section 16 of the Act granting exemption to the employer from the liability to make contributions
should be strictly construed. Fibrefab Consultants and Engineers Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1997 Lab
IC 2786 : (1998) 1 LLJ 1077 : (1998) 79 FLR 30.
Section 16(1)(b)—It cannot be said that merely because the petitioner had purchased old
machinery or is using the same premises it is not a new establishment. The test to be applied is
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 59 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
whether with a view to evade its liability under the Act, the claim for infancy protection is made.
Rubka Fruit Products v. Regional Commr., E.P.F. & F.P.F., 1978 Lab IC 1517 (Mad).
Sections 16(1)(b) and 1(3)—Section 16(1)(b) applies only to a newly set up establishment, i.e.
one which has all the ingredients of having been started from scratch. The period of infancy has to
be calculated from the date of the setting up of the business initially. It will not relate back to the date
when the establishment had twenty or more persons on its rolls or from the date of the change of
management and ownership of the establishment or its incorporation under the provisions of the
Companies Act. Sanjay Automobiles v. R.P.F. Commr., 1982 Lab IC 536 (All HC).
Sections 16(1)(b) and 2-A—Where the owners of a factory which was established in the year
1921 at a place A and was manufacturing inorganic chemicals, mainly fertilizers, started a new
factory at another place R in the year 1977 with separate registration number under the Factories
Act to manufacture organic chemicals with a separate set of workers for either concern and
separate profit and loss account, separate works managers and plant superintendents and without
any supervisory control by either of the factories on the other, the factory established in 1977, held,
could not be, merely on the ground of being owned by the same company, said to be a branch or
department of the older factory or not to be a new establishment for the purpose of entitlement to
infancy benefit under Section 16(1)(b) of the Act. Further, held, on the said facts the new factory
did not attract Section 2-A. R.P.F. Commr. v. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd., (1998) 2 SCC
446 : 1998 SCC (L&S) 584.
Sections 16(1)(b) and 7-A—Both requirements set out in sub-clauses (b) & (c) of Section 16(1)
have to be fulfilled before Central or State Government department can claim benefit of said sub-
clauses. H.P. Nagar Vikas Pradhikaran v. R.P.F. Commr., (1998) 2 LLJ 267 (HP)(DB).
► Date of establishment of factory—What is?—Section 16(1)(b)—On purchase of a factory,
the date of reckoning the period of 3 years under Section 16 would be the date of establishment of
the factory and not the date of its purchase. R.P.F. Commr. v. Lakshmi Ratan Engg. Works, AIR
1962 Punj 507 : (1962) 2 LLJ 604 : 22 FJR 278.
► Existence of factory discovered—Whether demand can be made with retrospective
effect.—The provisions of the Act make them operative only on and from the point of time when the
authorities under the Act hold that a particular unit is within the ambit of the Act and make a
consequential demand in terms of the Act and the Scheme. Any demand for a back period would be
not merely illogical and oppressive but also plainly inconsistent, with the terms of the Act which are
manifestly prospective in their operation. K.R. Subbaier v. R.P.F. Commr., Madras, (1962-63) 23
FJR 20 (Mad).
Section 16(1)(b) covers such establishments also the existence of which is interrupted by
closure, etc. The fact as to whether a new establishment within the meaning of Section 16(1)(b) has
been set up or not has to be decided on the facts of each case. Speedcrafts (P) Ltd. v. R.P.F.
Commr., 1978 Lab IC 1480.
The financial position of an establishment is not the only criterion which will entitle an
establishment to exemption under Section 16(2); other circumstances may also be considered.
Vishwa Bharati v. R.P.F. Commr., 1983 Lab IC 38 (Cal HC) : (1983) 1 LLJ 332.
Section 16 was amended by the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions
(Amendment) Act, 1998, omitting Section 16(1)(d) with the Explanation thereto w.e.f. 22-9-1997
Question whether such omission would have retrospective or prospective effect. It is a cardinal
principle of construction that every statute is prima facie prospective unless it is expressly or by
necessary implication made to have retrospective operation. The absence of a saving clause in a
new enactment preserving the rights and liabilities under the repealed law is neither material nor
decisive of the question. Sangam Spinners v. Regl. Provident Fund Commr., (2008) 1 SCC 391.
The State Act is a complete code in itself with regard to the educational institutions and the State
Government exercises substantive control over the institutions even though the institutions are not
‘owned’ by it. The word ‘control’ has not been defined under the EPF Act, 1952. The State
Government has the power of superintendence or the authority to direct, restrict or regulate the
working of the educational institutions. RPF Commr. v. Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School,
(2007) 1 SCC 268 : (2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 167.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 60 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to be covered under the exception to the EPF Act, 1952 stated in Section 16(1)(b), the
following two conditions have to be satisfied by the establishment seeking to be exempted from the
provisions of the EPF Act, 1952:
(1) it must be an establishment belonging to or under the control of the Central Government or a State
Government, and
(2) it must be an establishment whose employees are entitled to the benefit of contributory provident
fund or old age pension in accordance with any scheme or rule framed by the Central Government
or the State Government governing such benefits.
The two words used in the said section have different connotations. The words ‘belonging to’
signify ownership i.e. the Government-owned institutions would be covered under the said part and
the words ‘under the control of’ signify control other than ownership since ownership has already
been covered under the words ‘belonging to’. It must also be noted that the two words are separated
by the word ‘OR’ and therefore these two words refer to two mutually exclusive categories of
institutions. While the institutions, ‘belonging’ to the Central or the State Government would imply the
control of the State but the privately-owned institutions can be ‘under the control of’ the Government
in various ways. RPF Commr. v. Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School, (2007) 1 SCC 268 :
(2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 167.
271 [16-A. Authorising certain employers to maintain provident fund accounts.—(1)
the Official Gazette, and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the
notification, 273 [exempt, whether prospectively or retrospectively, from the operation]
of all or any of the provisions of any Scheme—
(a) any 274 [establishment] to which this Act applies if, in the opinion of the
appropriate Government, the rules of its provident fund with respect to the
rates of contribution are not less favourable than those specified in Section 6
and the employees are also in enjoyment of other provident fund benefits
which on the whole are not less favourable to the employees than the benefits
provided under this Act or any Scheme in relation to the employees in any
other 275 [establishment] of a similar character; or
(b) any 276 [establishment] if the employees of such 277 [establishment] are in
enjoyment of benefits in the nature of provident fund, pension or gratuity and
the appropriate Government is of opinion that such benefits, separately or
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 61 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jointly, are on the whole not less favourable to such employees than the
benefits provided under this Act or any Scheme in relation to employees in
any other 278 [establishment] of a similar character.
279
[* * *]
280 [Provided that no such exemption shall be made except after consultation with
the Central Board which on such consultation shall forward its views on exemption to
the appropriate Government within such time limit as may be specified in the
Scheme.]
281 [(1-A) Where an exemption has been granted to an establishment under clause
the conditions imposed under that sub-section or with any of the provisions of
sub-section (3-A);
(d) in the case of an exemption granted under sub-section (2-B), with any of the
provisions of sub-section (3-A).]
295
[(5) Where any exemption granted under sub-section (1), sub-section 296 [(1-C)],
297
[sub-section (2), sub-section (2-A) or sub-section (2-B)] is cancelled, the amount
of accumulations to the credit of every employee to whom such exemption applied, in
the provident fund, 298 [the [Pension]299 fund or the insurance fund] of the
establishment in which he is employed 300 [together with any amount forfeited from the
employer's share of contribution to the credit of the employee who leaves the
employment before the completion of the full period of service] shall be transferred
within such time and in such manner as may be specified in the Scheme or the
[Pension]301 Scheme 302 [or the Insurance Scheme] to the credit of his account in the
Fund or the [Pension]303 Fund 304 [or the Insurance Fund], as the case may be.]
305 [(6) Subject to the provisions of sub-section 306 [(1-C)], the employer of an
function in accordance with the guidelines that may be issued from time to time by
the Central Government/Central Provident Fund Commissioner (CPFC) or an officer
authorised by him.
3. All employees, as defined in Section 2(f) of the Act, who have been eligible to
become members of the Provident Fund, had the establishment not been granted
exemption, shall be enrolled as members.
4. Where an employee who is already a member of the Employees' Provident Fund
or a provident fund of any other exempted establishment is employed in his
establishment, the employer shall immediately enrol him as a member of the fund.
The employer should also arrange to have the accumulations in the provident fund
account of such employee with his previous employer transferred and credited into his
account.
5. The employer shall transfer to the Board of Trustees the contributions payable to
the Provident Fund by himself and employees at the rate prescribed under the Act
from time to time by the 15th of each month following the month for which the
contributions are payable. The employer shall be liable to pay simple interest in terms
of the provisions of Section 7-Q of the Act for any delay in payment of any dues
towards the Board of Trustees.
6. The employer shall bear all the expenses of the administration of the Provident
Fund and also make good any other loss that may be caused to the Provident Fund
due to theft, burglary, defalcation, misappropriation or any other reason.
7. Any deficiency in the interest declared by the Board of Trustees is to be made
good by the employer to bring it up to the statutory limit.
8. The employer shall display on the notice board of the establishment, a copy of
the rules of the funds as approved by the appropriate authority and as and when
amended thereto along with a translation in the language of the majority of the
employees.
9. The rate of contribution payable, the conditions and quantum of advances and
other matters laid down under the provident fund rules of the establishment and the
interest credited to the account of each member, calculated on the monthly running
balance of the member and declared by the Board of Trustees shall not be lower than
those declared by the Central Government under the various provisions prescribed in
the Act and the Scheme framed thereunder.
10. Any amendment to the Scheme, which is more beneficial to the employees than
the existing rules of the establishment, shall be made applicable to them
automatically pending formal amendment of the rules of the Trust.
11. No amendment in the rules shall be made by the employer without the prior
approval of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (referred to as RPFC hereafter).
The RPFC shall before giving his approval give a reasonable opportunity to the
employees to explain their point of view.
12. All claims for withdrawals, advances and transfers should be settled
expeditiously, within the maximum time frame prescribed by the Employees' Provident
Fund Organisation.
13. The Board of Trustees shall maintain detailed accounts to show the
contributions credited, withdrawal and interest in respect of each employee. The
maintenance of such records should preferably be done electronically. The
establishments should periodically transmit the details of members' accounts
electronically as and when directed by the CPFC/RPFC.
14. The Board of Trustees shall issue an annual statement of accounts or passbooks
to every employee within six months of the close of financial/accounting year free of
cost once in the year. Additional printouts can be made available as and when the
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 65 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
members want, subject to nominal charges. In case of passbook, the same shall
remain in custody of employee to be updated periodically by the Trustees when
presented to them.
15. The employer shall make necessary provisions to enable all the members to be
able to see their account balance from the computer terminals as and when required
by them.
16. The Board of Trustees and the employer shall file such returns monthly/annually
as may be prescribed by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation within the
specified time-limit, failing which it will be deemed as a default and the Board of
Trustees and employer will jointly and separately be liable for suitable penal action by
the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation:
312 [Provided
that above mentioned returns shall be filed by the employer in
electronic format also, in such form and manner as may be specified by the
Commissioner.]
17. The Board of Trustees shall invest the monies of the provident fund as per the
directions of the Government from time to time. Failure to make investments as per
directions of the Government shall make the Board of Trustees separately and jointly
liable to surcharge as may be imposed by the Central Provident Fund Commissioner or
his representative.
18. (a) The securities shall be obtained in the name of Trust. The securities so
obtained should be in dematerialised (DEMAT) form and in case the required facility is
not available in the areas where the Trust operates, the Board of Trustees shall inform
the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner concerned about the same.
(b) The Board of Trustees shall maintain a scriptwise register and ensure timely
realisation of interest.
(c) The DEMAT Account should be opened though depository participants approved
by Reserve Bank of India and Central Government in accordance with the instructions
issued by the Central Government in this regard.
(d) The cost of maintaining DEMAT account should be treated as incidental cost of
investment by the Trust. Also all types of cost of investments like brokerage for
purchase of securities, etc. shall be treated as incidental cost of investment by the
Trust.
19. All such investments made, like purchase of securities and bonds, should be
lodged in the safe custody of depository participants, approved by Reserve Bank of
India and Central Government, who shall be the custodian of the same. On closure of
establishment or liquidation or cancellation of exemption from EPF Scheme, 1952,
such custodian shall transfer the investment obtained in the name of the Trust and
standing in its credit to the RPFC concerned directly on receipt of request from the
RPFC concerned to that effect.
20. The exempted establishment shall intimate to the RPFC concerned the details of
depository participants (approved by Reserve Bank of India and Central Government),
with whom and in whose safe custody, the investments made in the name of trust viz.
investments made in securities, bonds, etc. have been lodged. However, the Board of
Trustees may raise such sum or sums of money as may be required for meeting
obligatory expenses such as settlement of claims, grant of advances as per rules and
transfer of member's P.F. accumulations in the event of his/her leaving service of the
employer and any other receipts by sale of the securities or other investments
standing in the name of the Fund subject to the prior approval of the Regional
Provident Fund Commissioner.
21. Any commission, incentive, bonus, or other pecuniary rewards given by any
financial or other institutions for the investments made by the Trust should be credited
to its account.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 66 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. The employer and the members of the Board of Trustees, at the time of grant of
exemption, shall furnish a written undertaking to the RPFC in such format as may be
prescribed from time to time, inter alia, agreeing to abide by the conditions which are
specified and this shall be legally binding on the employer and the Board of Trustees,
including their successors and assignees, or such conditions as may be specified later
for continuation of exemption.
23. The employer and the Board of Trustees shall also give an undertaking to
transfer the funds promptly within the time-limit prescribed by the concerned RPFC in
the event of cancellation of exemption. This shall be legally binding on them and will
make them liable for prosecution in the event of any delay in the transfer of funds.
24. (a) The account of the Provident Fund maintained by the Board of Trustees shall
be subject to audit by a qualified independent chartered accountant annually. Where
considered necessary, the CPFC or the RPFC in charge of the Region shall have the
right to have the accounts re-audited by any other qualified auditor and the expenses
so incurred shall be borne by the employer.
(b) A copy of the Auditor's report along with the audited balance sheet should be
submitted to the RPFC concerned by the Auditors directly within six months after the
closing of the financial year from 1st April to 31st March. The format of the balance
sheet and the information to be furnished in the report shall be as prescribed by the
Employees' Provident Fund Organisation and made available with the RPFC Office in
electronic format as well as a signed hard copy.
(c) The same auditors should not be appointed for two consecutive years and not
more than two years in a block of six years.
25. A company reporting loss for three consecutive financial years or erosion in their
capital base shall have their exemption withdrawn from the first day of the
next/succeeding financial year.
26. The employer in relation to the exempted establishment shall provide for such
facilities for inspection and pay such inspection charges as the Central Government
may from time to time direct under clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 17 of the
Act within 15 days from the close of every month.
27. In the event of any violation of the conditions for grant of exemption, by the
employer or the Board of Trustees, the exemption granted may be cancelled after
issuing a show-cause notice in this regard to the concerned persons.
28. In the event of any loss to the trust as a result of any fraud, defalcation, wrong
investment decisions, etc. the employer shall be liable to make good the loss.
29. In case of any change of legal status of the establishment, which has been
granted exemption, as a result of merger, demerger, acquisition, sale, amalgamation,
formation of a subsidiary, whether wholly owned or not, etc. the exemption granted
shall stand revoked and the establishment should promptly report the matter to the
RPFC concerned for grant of fresh exemption.
30. In case, there are more than one units/establishments participating in the
common Provident Fund which have been granted exemption, all the trustees shall be
jointly and separately liable/responsible for any default committed by any of the
trustees/employer of any of the participating units and the RPFC shall take suitable
legal action against all the trustees of the common Provident Fund Trust.
31. The Central Government may lay down any further conditions for continuation of
exemption of the establishments.]
NOTIFICATIONS
(1)
313
S.O. 3256, dated 23rd Nov. 1963.—In pursuance of sub-section (3) of Section
17 of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), read with Paragraph 27
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 67 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, the Central Government hereby
directs that the employers in relation to establishments, whose employees have been
exempted under the said paragraph, shall invest every month 90 per cent of the
provident fund accumulations in respect of such employees in Central Government
securities within fifteen days of the date of collections. The balance of 10 per cent of
provident fund accumulations shall be kept as fluid cash for making refunds to the
outgoing members or their nominees/heirs.
(2)
314 S.O. 3368, dated 15th September, 1967.—In exercise of the powers conferred
by clause (a) of sub-section (3) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds Act,
1952 (19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby directs that every employer in
relation to an establishment exempted under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section
(1) of Section 17 of the said Act, or in relation to an employee or a class of employees
exempted under Paragraph 27, or as the case may be, Paragraph 27-A of the
Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952,—
(1) shall invest every month within a period of fifteen days of the date of collections
not less than 80 per cent (eighty per cent) of the provident fund accumulations
in respect of the employees in such establishment, or such employee or, as the
case may be, such class of employees, which are available after making provision
for refunds to outgoing members or their nominees or heirs, in Government
securities (hereinafter referred to as ‘Central Government securities’) as defined
in sub-clause (i) or sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of sub-section (2) of Section 2 of
the Public Debt Act, 1944 (18 of 1944), being securities created and issued by
the Central Government;
(2) shall invest within the period specified in direction (1) above the balance of the
said accumulations which are so available in any Government security (whether
created and issued by the Central Government or by any State Government)
referred to in clause (a) of the said sub-section (2) of Section 2 of the Public
Debt Act, 1944 (18 of 1944), or in any Savings or other Certificates issued by
the Central Government;
(3) shall not re-invest such accumulations (whether invested in securities created
and issued by the Central Government or in certificates issued by the Central
Government or in securities created and issued by a State Government) in any
securities other than ‘Central Government Securities’;
(4) shall not convert any securities or certificates referred to in direction (3) in
which such accumulations have been invested into any securities other than
‘Central Government Securities’; and
(5) shall formulate proper procedure for prompt investment or such accumulations
in accordance with the aforesaid directions and shall have it approved by the
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner concerned.
(3)
S.O. 1433, dated May 29, 2015.—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause
(a) of sub-section (3) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and
Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) and in supersession of the notification
of the Government of India, Ministry of Labour, No. S.O. 2126, dated the 9th July,
2003, the Central Government hereby directs that every employer in relation to an
establishment exempted under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (i) of Section 17
of the said Act or in relation to any employee or class of employee exempted under
Paragraph 27, or as the case may be, Paragraph (27-A) of the Employees' Provident
Fund Scheme, 1952 shall transfer the monthly provident fund contribution in respect
of the establishment or, as the case may be of the employee or class of employees
within fifteen days of the close of the month to the Board of Trustee duly constituted
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 68 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in respect of that establishment and that the said Board of Trustee shall invest every
month with in a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the said contributions
from the employee, the provident fund accumulations in respect of the establishment
or as the case may be, of the employee, or class of employee that is to say, the
contributions and interest as reduced by any obligatory outgoings in accordance with
the following pattern, namely—
Category Category/Sub-Category Percentage
No. amount to
be
invested
(i) Government Securities and Related investments Minimum
(a) Government securities, 45% and
(b) Other securities [as defined in Section 2(h) of the up to 50%
Securities Contract (Regulations) Act, 1956] the
principal whereof and interest whereon is fully and
unconditionally guaranteed by the Central Government
or any State Government.
The portfolio invested under this sub-category of securities
shall not be in excess of 10% of the total portfolio of the
fund.
(c) units of mutual funds set up as dedicated funds for
investment in Government securities and regulated by
the Securities and Exchange Board of India:
Provided that the portfolio invested in such mutual funds
shall not be more than 5% of the total portfolio of the fund at
any point in time and fresh investments made in them shall
not exceed 5% of the accretions invested in the year.
(ii) Debt instruments and Related Investments Minimum
(a) Listed (or proposed to be listed in case of fresh issue) 35% and
debt securities issued by bodies corporate, including up to 45%
banks and public financial institutions (‘Public Financial
Institutes’) as defined under Section 2 of the
Companies Act, 2013), which have a minimum residual
maturity period of three years from the date of
investment.
(b) Basel III Tier-I bonds issued by scheduled commercial
banks under RBI Guidelines:
Provided that in case of initial offering of the bonds the
investment shall be made only in such Tier-I bonds which
are either listed or are proposed to be listed.
Provided further that investment shall be made in such
bonds of a scheduled bank from the secondary market or
from subsequent placement only if the existing Tier-I bonds
are listed and regularly traded.
Total portfolio invested in this sub-category, at any time,
shall not be more than 2% of the total portfolio of the fund.
No investment in this sub-category in initial offerings shall
exceed 20% of the initial offering and further, the aggregate
value of such bonds held by the fund shall not exceed 20%
of such bonds issued till that point in time by that Bank.
(c) Rupee Bonds having an outstanding maturity of at
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 69 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
any particular asset before investment is made by the fund in that particular asset and
also during the period over which it is held by the fund. The requirement of ratings as
mandated in this notification merely intends to limit the risk associated with
investments at a broad and general level. Accordingly, it should not be construed in
any manner as an endorsement for investment in any asset satisfying the minimum
prescribed rating or a substitute for the due diligence prescribed for being carried out
by the fund/trust.
v. The trust/fund should adopt and implement prudent guidelines to prevent
concentration of investment in any one company, corporate group or sector.
10. If the fund has engaged services of professional fund/asset managers for
management of its assets, payment to whom is being made on the basis of the value
of each transaction, the value of funds invested by them in any mutual funds
mentioned in any of the categories or ETFs or Index Funds shall be reduced before
computing the payment due to them in order to avoid double incidents of costs. Due
caution will be exercised to ensure that the same investment are not churned with a
view to enhancing the fee payable. In this regard, commissions for investments in
category (iii) instruments will be carefully regulated, in particular.
(4)
Submission of monthly return by exempted establishments
S.O. 936, dated 18th March, 1991.—In pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (3)
of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
(19 of 1952), read with sub-paragraph (2) of Paragraph 27 of the Employees'
Provident Funds Scheme, 1952, and in supersession of the notification of the
Government of India in the late Ministry of Labour and Employment No. S.O. 3255,
dated the 12th November, 1963, the Central Government hereby directs that the
employers in relation to the establishments whose employees have been granted
exemption under Paragraph 27 of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952,
shall submit a monthly return to the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner by the
twenty-fifth of the month following that to which it relates, in the pro forma set out in
the Schedule annexed hereto.
THE SCHEDULE
Monthly return to be submitted by the establishments whose employees have been
granted exemption under Paragraph 27 of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme.
1. Introductory:
(a) Code No. and Name of the :
factory/establishment
(b) Authority which granted the exemption :
(c) Accounting year for the provident fund :
2. Employees:
(a) Total No. of employees as at the end of the :
previous month
(b) No. of employees who joined service during :
the month
(c) No. of employees who left service during the :
month
(d) Total No. of employees as at the end of month :
Permanent :
Temporary :
Casual :
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 75 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Badli :
Contract :
Contractors :
Workers :
(e) Whether declaration relating to previous :
provident fund membership, if any, obtained
from all new entrants toservice
3. Subscribers to the private fund:
(a) No. of subscribers as at the end of previous :
month
(b) No. of employees granted exemption during :
the month and enrolled as new subscribers
(c) No. enrolled in view of their subsisting :
provident fund membership in other
establishments
(Please also indicate whether provident fund
of these employees has been received from
other establishments).
(d) No. of subscribers who have ceased to be :
members during the month
(e) No. of subscribers as at the end of the month :
4. Wages, current contributions, i.e., contribution
during the
month, refunds, etc.
(a) Total amount of gross wages liable to :
provident fund contributions
(b) Rate of contributions :
(c) Previous arrears of provident fund dues :
(d) Current provident fund contributions :
(i) Employees' share deducted from their : Rs
wages
(ii) Employer's share : Rs
(iii) Repayment of loans/advances by the :
members
(e) Total of (c) and (d) :
(f) Whether the penal interest due, if any, has :
been paid
5. Other income during the month:
(a) Interest on investments : Rs
(b) Maturity proceeds :
(i) State/Central Government securities : Rs
(ii) State/Central Government guaranteed : Rs
securities
(iii) Special Deposit Scheme : Rs
(iv) Other receipts : Rs
(c) Total : Rs
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 76 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Total receipts (4 + 5)
7. Payments:
(a) Claims : Rs
(b) Loans/advances : Rs
(c) Transfer to other provident funds : Rs
(d) Other payments (nature of payments to be : Rs
specified)
(e) Total (a) + (b) + (c) + (d) : Rs
8. Net amount available for investment (total item 6 minus item 7):
9. Details of Investments:
Balance lying uninvested Amount Total Amount Balance Date of
at the end of the allocated invested amount investment,
previous month during lying i.e. actual date
the uninvested of purchase of
month securities
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
(i) State/Central
Government securities
(ii) State/Central
Government guaranteed
securities
(iii) Special deposits
(iv) Others
10. Inspection charges:
(a) Past dues, if any :
(b) Amount due for the month :
(c) Amount remitted during the month :
(d) Date of payment :
(e) Amount of damages for belated remittance :
levied, but not paid
11. Total Investments as on 31st March (to be :
furnished in the return for March of each year) (i.e.,
investment less redemption proceeds from the
beginning)
(A) (i) State/Central Government securities :
(ii) State/Central Government guaranteed :
securities
(iii) Post Office Time Deposits :
(iv) National Small Savings Certificates :
(v) Special Deposits Schemes :
(vi) Others (nature of securities/deposits to :
be specified)
(B) Face value of Government Promissory Notes :
yet to be converted as stock certificates
12. (a) In whose names the securities have been purchased. If, the same are in the
name of anyone other than holder of the provident fund trust, amount thereof and the
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 77 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
reasons thereunder.
Note : Securities are required to be purchased only in the names of the
trust/holders of provident fund according to rules.
(b) In whose custody the securities are kept? If with the bankers, whether safe
custody receipts, etc. have been obtained from them.
13. Audit of provident fund accounts:
(a) Have the accounts been audited? If so, up to :
what period? If not, brief reasons therefor
(b) Have the audited balance-sheets been :
submitted to the Regional Provident Fund
Commissioner?
If so, up to what period? :
If not, brief reasons therefor :
14. Annual Statements of Accounts to subscribers
(a) Have the subscribers been issued the annual :
statements of accounts up to date?
(b) If not, period up to which issued and brief :
reasons for non-issue
(c) No. of accounts not yet issued (year-wise) :
(d) Rate of interest credited to the subscribers' :
account, year, interest rate and how the rate
was arrived at
(e) Method of crediting interest, i.e., whether it is :
on opening balance, monthly balance or
closing balance
15. Rules of the Provident Fund:
(a) Details of amendment, if any, carried out :
during the month with the approval of the
Regional Provident
Fund Commissioner :
(b) Are the provident fund rules up to date? :
(c) If not, what are the amendments yet to be :
carried out?
(d) Whether the provident fund rules are printed :
in Englishas well as in regional language
(e) Whether a copy of the provident fund rules :
has been supplied to the subscribers
16. Inspection of the establishment:
Date of the last inspection by the Provident
Fund Inspector
Date: Signature with Official Seal
of employer
or his authorised Official.
(5)
S.O. 1436, dated July 9, 1998.—In pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (3) of
Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
(19 of 1952) and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in the
Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 3450 dated the 17th September, 1964 the Central
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 78 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
monthly return to the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner by the 25th of the
month following that to which it relates in the pro forma set out in Schedule hereto
annexed.
SCHEDULE
Monthly return to be made by establishments exempted under Section 17(2-A) of the
Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for the month of
……..
Name of the establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Code No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Name of the private scheme
Section under which exemption granted. . . . . 17(2-A)
1. Subscribers—
(i) No. of employees covered under the
schemeon the last date of the previous
month.
(ii) No. of employees covered during the month.
(iii) No. of employees left service during the
month on account of cessation of
employment.
(iv) No. of covered employees on the last day
ofthe month.
(v) Total No. of employees in the establishment
on thelast date of the month.
2. Initial accumulations—
(i) Accumulations prior to the commencement of
the Act:
(a) Total amount of accumulations prior to
thecommencement of the Employees' Deposit
-linked Insurance Scheme, 1976.
(b) Amount invested out of (a).
(c) Balance remaining uninvested as on the
dateof applicability.
(d) Amount transferred in securities and cash
to the Board of Trustees and date of transfer.
(e) Balance (a - d) Rs . . . dt . . . . .
(ii) (a) Employer's contributions from the date
ofapplication of the Employees' Deposit-
linked Insurance Scheme, 1976 to the
preceding month.
(b) Amount transferred to the Board of
Trusteesand the date of transfer.
(c) Balance (ii - c) Rs . . . dt . . . . . .
Note.—Item 2 is required to be filled in when the return is made for the first time.
3. Wages and current contributions—
(i) Total amount of gross wages liable to
Employees' Deposit-linked Insurance Scheme
contributions (basic wages, dearness
allowance if any, and cash value of
foodconcessions admissible thereon).
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 80 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note.—The aggregate of (a), (b), (c), (d) & (e) should tally with the amount
specified against Item 6(vii).
8. Inspection charges—
(i) Past dues, if any. Rs . . . . .
(ii) Dues for the month. Rs . . . . .
(iii) Amount paid and the date of payment. Rs . . . . .
(iv) Balance to be paid. Rs . . . . .
Date . . . . . .
Note.—Details in Item Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 are not required to be filled in by
Establishments, having G.I.S. of the L.I.C. of India.
(9)
320 S.O. 3469, dt. 22nd August, 1983.—In pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section
(3) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,
1952 (19 of 1952), and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India
in the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilitation (Department of Labour &
Employment) No. S.O. 4192, dated the 23rd November, 1968, the Central
Government hereby directs that the employers in relation to the establishments that
have been granted exemption under sub-section (1) of Section 17 thereof, shall
submit a monthly return to the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner by the twenty-
fifth of the month following that to which it relates in the pro forma set out in the
Schedule hereto annexed.
SCHEDULE
Monthly return to be made by the establishments exempted under Section 17(1) of
the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, for the month
of . . . . .
1. Introductory:
(a) Code No. and name of establishment:
(b) Whether in the public/private/joint sector
(c) Section under which exemption was granted Section 17(1)(a)
_______________
Section 17(1)(b)
(d) Effective date of exemption
(e) Authority which granted the exemption Central Government
____________________
State Government
(f) Accounting year for the Provident Fund
2. Employees:
(a) Total number of employees as at the end of
the previous month
(b) Number of employees who joined service
during the month
(c) Number of employees who left service
during the month
(d) Total number of employees as at the end of
the month:
permanent
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 82 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
temporary
casual
badli
contract
(e) Whether declaration relating to previous
provident fund membership, if any, obtained
from all new entrants to service
3. Subscribers to the provident fund:
(a) Number of subscribers as at the end of the
previous month
(b) Number of subscribers enrolled during the
month
(c) (i) Number enrolled for the first time on
completion of the qualifying period of service, if
any;
(ii) Number enrolled in view of their subsisting
provident fund membership in other
establishments
(Please also indicate whether the Provident Fund of these employees have been
received from other establishments.)
(d) Number of subscribers who have ceased to
be members during the month
(e) Number of subscribers as at the end of the
month
4. Initial accumulations:
(a) Accumulations prior to the commencement
of the Act
(i) Total net accumulations prior to the
commencement of the Act
(ii) Amount invested out of (i)
(iii) Balance remaining uninvested as on the
date of applicability of the Act
(iv) Amount transferred to the Board of
Trustees and date of transfer
In securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
In cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date
(v) Balance : (i) — (iv)
(b) Contributions from the date of applicability
of the Act upto the preceding month;
(i) Employees' contributions
(ii) Employers' contributions
(iii) Refund of advance/loan, if any
(iv) Other receipts, if any
(v) Total
(vi) Payment towards claims/loans, etc.
(vii) Amount transferred to the Board of
Trustees
(viii) Date of such transfer
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 83 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(**) Rs . . . . . . . Date
(ix) Balance : (v) - (vi) - (vii)
If by cheque, date of issue of cheque and date of realisation of the cheque . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
Note.—Item No. 4 is required to be filled in when the return is made for the first
time.
5. Constitution of Board of Trustees:
(a) Date on which the present Board was constituted/whether the election of
labour trustees took place according to the procedure prescribed
(b) Its term
(c) Whether the Board met during the month, if so, on what date
(Please enclose an attested copy of the minutes of the meeting.)
6. Wages, current contributions, etc., i.e., contributions during the month, refunds,
etc.,
(a) Wages:
Total amount of gross wages liable to provident fund contributions:
(b) Rate of contributions:
(c) Amount of arrears due for transfer to the Board of Trustees at the end of
previous month;
(d) Current provident fund contributions (i.e., after segregation of 1-1/6% wages
towards Family Pension Fund contributions):
(i) Employees' share deducted from their Rs
wages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(ii) Employers' share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
(iii) Repayment of loans/advances by Rs
themembers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
(e) Total of (c) and (d) : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
. . . .
(**) If by cash, the date of payment
(f) Amount transferred to the Board of
Trustees:
(i) by cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
Date of payment:
(ii) by cheque. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
. .
(iii) Date of issue of cheque by the
employer:
(iv) Date of realisation of the cheque by the
Board of Trustees:
(g) Balance due for transfer to the Board of
Trustees
(e) - (f)(i) + (ii). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rs
. .
(h) Whether the penal interest due, if any, has
beenpaid?
7. Other income during the month:
(a) Interest on investments Rs
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 84 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
S.O. 2625, dt. 22nd August, 1978.—In pursuance of clause (a) of sub-section (3-
A) of Section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,
1952 (19 of 1952), the Central Government hereby directs that the employers in
relation to an establishment or any person or class of persons exempted under sub-
section (2-A) or sub-section (3-A) of Section 17 of the said Act, shall pay to the
Insurance Fund, inspection charges at the rate of zero point zero two per cent (0.02
per cent) of the aggregate of the basic wages, dearness allowance (including the cash
value of any food concession) and retaining allowance, if any, for the time being
payable to the employees of the establishment or receivable by the persons or class of
persons, as the case may be, in respect of which contributions would have been
payable but for such exemption, within fifteen days of the close of every month.
► Pendency of application.—Mere pendency of an application for exemption does not relieve
of the liability to comply with the provisions of the Act. H.P. Agro Industries Corpn. Ltd. v. R.P.F.
Commr., 1994 Lab IC 1286 : (1993) 2 CLR 505 : (1994) 2 LLN 715 (HP)(DB).
Where Central Government, being the then appropriate Government, granted exemption to the
respondent-establishment under Section 17(1)(a), subsequently, revised conditions for the grant of
exemption forwarded by the Central Government to the appropriate Governments, one of the revised
conditions was that any amendment to the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, which was more
beneficial to the Employees than the rules of the establishment for the time being in force, would be
applicable to them automatically, such conditions, held, could not become applicable automatically to
the already exempted establishments, which could be subjected to such conditions only by a
notification of the appropriate Government amending the exempted scheme and published in the
Official Gazette. Hence, High Court erred in holding that the respondent-establishment was bound to
pay interest at higher rates merely because the rate of interest under the statutory scheme was
enhanced by the Central Government. Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Employees' Provident Fund
Institution v. Dev Kumar Holani, (1998) 6 SCC 35 : 1998 SCC (L&S) 1444.
If appellant has provided separate provident fund scheme which is more beneficial than what was
provided under the Act, then appropriate course for appellant is to seek exemption from operation of
the Act under Section 17 of the Act. Canbank Financial Services Ltd., Bangalore v. R.P.F.
Commr., (1997) 3 LLN 575 : (1997) 2 CLR 734.
► Levy of Damages.—Where during the pendency of application for exemption made to the
appropriate Govt. under Section 17 of the Act, the Commissioner granted temporary exemption with
retrospective effect from the date of commencement of the Employees' Deposit-Linked Insurance
Scheme, 1976 under para 28(7) thereof and subsequently the Government also issued the final
order of exemption and the employer had even before the passing of the Commissioner's order paid
all the inspection charges, held, there was no delay in payment of inspection charges. Hence, no
damages could be levied. Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. v. R.P.F. Commr., 1994 Supp (2) SCC
723 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 1185.
► Default in payment of contribution.—In cases of default in payment of contribution to
provident fund, proceedings for recovery of damages can be initiated against employers of such
exempted establishments. This is clear from deeming provision contained in second part of Section
17(1-A)(a). As definition of “fund” would apply to a scheme operating in an exempted establishment,
default in payment of contribution to such scheme would attract Section 14-B. Expression “so far as
may be” in Section 17(1-A)(a) does not limit scope of the provision. Section 17(1-A)(a), being a
remedial or social welfare provision, should be construed as a whole with a purposive and social
justice oriented approach, Regl. Provident Fund Commr. v. Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., (2012) 2 SCC
489.
The expression ‘whoever’ in Section 14(2-A) in relation to non-compliance with Section 17(3)(a)
refers to the employer as defined in Section 2(e) and not to directors not covered by that section.
K.L. Jalan v. State of W.B., (1993) 67 FLR 195 : (1993) 2 LLN 100 : (1994) 1 LLJ 224 (Cal).
321
[17-A. Transfer of accounts.—(1) Where an employee employed in an
establishment to which this Act applies leaves his employment and obtains re-
employment in another establishment to which this Act does not apply the amount of
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 88 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
accumulations to the credit of such employee in the Fund or, as the case may be, in
the provident fund of the establishment left by him shall be transferred, within such
time as may be specified by the Central Government in this behalf, to the credit of his
account in the provident fund of the establishment in which he is re-employed, if the
employee so desires and the rules in relation to that provident fund permit such
transfer.
(2) Where an employee employed in an establishment to which this Act does not
apply leaves his employment and obtains re-employment in another establishment to
which this Act applies, the amount of accumulations to the credit of such employee in
the provident fund of the establishment left by him may, if the employee so desires
and the rules in relation to such provident fund permit, be transferred to the credit of
his account in the Fund or as the case may be, in the provident fund of the
establishment in which he is re-employed.]
NOTIFICATION
S.O. 693, dated 18th February, 1965.—In pursuance of the provisions contained
in sub-section (1) of Section 17-A of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 the
Central Government hereby specifies a period of three months as the period within
which the amount of accumulations to the credit in the Fund under the said Act of an
employee employed in an establishment to which the aforesaid Act applies, leaves his
employment and obtains re-employment in another establishment to which the same
does not apply shall, if the employee so desires and the rules in relation to that
provident fund permit such transfer, be transferred to the credit of his account of the
provident fund of the establishment in which he is re-employed.
322 [17-AA. Act to have effect notwithstanding anything contained in Act 31 of 1956.
—The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent
therewith contained in the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956.]
323 [17-B. Liability in case of transfer of establishment.—Where an employer, in
Fund Commr. v. Eveready Industries (India) Ltd., (2009) 120 FLR 710 (Cal).
326
[18. Protection of action taken in good faith.—No suit, prosecution or other legal
proceeding shall lie against the Central Government, a State Government, the
Presiding Officer of a Tribunal, any authority referred to in Section 7-A, an Inspector or
any other person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done in
pursuance of this Act, the Scheme, the [Pension]327 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme.
328
[18-A. Authorities and inspector to be public servant.—The authorities referred to
in Section 7-A and every inspector shall be deemed to be a public servant within the
meaning of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).]]
329 [19. Delegation of powers.—The appropriate Government may direct that any
power or authority or jurisdiction exercisable by it under this Act 330 [, the Scheme, 331
[the [Pension]332 Scheme or the Insurance Scheme]] shall, in relation to such matters
and subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the direction, be
exercisable also—
(a) where the appropriate Government is the Central Government, by such officer
or authority subordinate to the Central Government or by the State
Government333 or by such officer or authority subordinate to the State
Government, as may be specified in the notification; and
(b) where the appropriate Government is a State Government, by such officer or
authority subordinate to the State Government as may be specified in the
notification.]
► Power to grant sanction.—Power to give sanction delegated to State Government can
further be delegated to Labour Commissioner. State of U.P. v. Lala Ram Gopal Gupta, 1974 Lab IC
963 (All).
334 [20. Power of Central Government to give directions.—The Central Government
may, from time to time, give such directions to the Central Board as it may think fit
for the efficient administration of this Act and when any such direction is given, the
Central Board shall comply with such direction.
21. Power to make Rules.—(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may
provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—
(a) 335 [* * *]
(b) the form and the manner in which, and the time within which, an appeal
shall be filed before a Tribunal and the fees payable for filing such appeal;
(c) the manner of certifying the copy of the certificate, to be forwarded to the
Recovery Officer under sub-section (2) of Section 8-C; and
(d) any other matter, which has to be, or may be, prescribed by rules under this
Act.
(3) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made,
before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days
which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if,
before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive
sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both
Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect
only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that
any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of
anything previously done under that rule.
22. Power to remove difficulties.—(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the
provisions of this Act, as amended by the Employees' Provident Funds and
Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1988, the Central Government may, by
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 90 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the
provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for the removal of
the difficulty:
Provided that no such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of three years
from the date on which the said amendment Act receives the assent of the President.
(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made,
be laid before each House of Parliament.]
SCHEDULE I
[See Sections 2(i) and 4]
Any industry engaged in the manufacture 336 [* * *] of any of the following, namely:
Cement.
Cigarettes.
Electrical, mechanical or general engineering products.
Iron and steel.
Paper.
Textiles (made wholly or in part of cotton or wool or jute or silk whether natural or
artificial).
337 [1. Matches.
(i) Fertilizers,
(ii) Turpentine,
(iii) Rosin,
(iv) Medical and pharmaceutical preparations,
(v) Toilet preparations,
(vi) Soaps,
(vii) Inks,
(viii) Intermediates, dyes, colour lacs and toners,
(ix) Fatty acids, and
339 [(x) Oxygen, acetylene and carbon-dioxide gases industry.]
2. Indigo.
3. Lac including shellac.
4. Non-edible vegetable and animal oils and fats.]
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 91 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
340
[Mineral oil refining industry.]
341 [(i) Industrial and Power Alcohol industry; and
(ii) Asbestos Cement Sheets industry.]
342 [Biscuit-making industry including composite units making biscuits and products
Flour milling.
Dal milling.]
347
[Starch industry.]
348 [Petroleum or natural gas exploration, prospecting, drilling or production.]
350
[Leather and leather products industry.]
351 [Stoneware jars.]
352 [Crockery.]
353
[The fruit and vegetable preservation industry, that is to say, any industry which
is engaged in the preparation or production of any of the following articles, namely—
(i) canned and bottled fruits, juices and pulps,
(ii) canned and bottled vegetables,
(iii) frozen fruits and vegetables,
(iv) jams, jellies and marmalades,
(v) tomato products, ketchup and sauces,
(vi) squashes, crushes, cordials and ready-to-serve beverages or any other
beverages containing fruit juice or fruit pulp,
(vii) preserved, candied and crystallised fruits and peels,
(viii) chutneys,
(ix) any other unspecified item relating to the preservation or canning of fruits and
vegetables.]
354 [Cashewnut industry.]
355
[Confectionery industry.]
356
[(1) Buttons.
(2) Brushes.
(3) Plastic and Plastic products.
(4) Stationery products.]
357 [Aerated water industry, that is to say, any industry engaged in the manufacture
361
[Pickers industry.]
362
[Milk and milk products industry.]
363 [Non-ferrous metals and alloys in the form of ingots industry.]
364
[Bread industry.]
365
[Stemming or re-drying of tobacco leaf industry, that is to say, any industry
engaged in the stemming, re-drying, handling, sorting, grading or packing of tobacco
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 92 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf.]
366 [Agarbattee (including Dhoop and Dhoop battee) industry.]
367 [Coir (excluding the spinning sector) industry.]
368
[Tobacco industry, that is to say, any industry engaged in the manufacture of
cigars, Zarda, snuff, Quivam and Guraku from tobacco.]
369 [Paper products industry.]
370 [Licensed salt industry, that is to say, any industry engaged in the manufacture
of salt for which a licence is necessary and which has land not less than 371 [4.05
hectares].]
372 [‘Linoleum industry’ and ‘Indoleum industry’.]
382 [Beer manufacturing industry, that is to say, any industry engaged in the
386
[Myrobalan extract powder, Myrobalan extract solid and Vegetable tannin blended
extract industries.]
387 [Bricks industry, that is to say any industry engaged in the manufacture of
Bricks.]
388 [All industries based on asbestos as principal raw material.]
389
[Industries manufacturing iron ore pellets.]
390
[Explanation.—In this Schedule, without prejudice to the ordinary meaning of
expressions used therein,—
(a) the expression “Electrical, mechanical or general engineering products”
includes—
(1) machinery and equipment for the generation, transmission, distribution or
measurement of electrical energy and motors including cables and wires,
(2) telephones, telegraph and wireless communication apparatus,
(3) electric lamps (not including glass bulbs),
(4) electric fans and electrical domestic appliances,
(5) storage and dry batteries,
(6) radio receivers and sound reproducing instruments,
(7) machinery used in industry (including textile machinery) other than electrical
machinery and machine tools,
(8) boilers and prime movers, including internal combustion engines, marine
engines and locomotives,
(9) machine tools, that is to say, metal and wood working machinery,
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 93 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
391
[See Section 5(1-B)]
MATTERS FOR WHICH PROVISION MAY BE MADE IN A SCHEME
1. The employees or class of employees who shall join the Fund, and the conditions
under which employees may be exempted from joining the Fund or from making any
contribution.
2. The time and manner in which contribution shall be made to the Fund by
employers and by, or on behalf of employees, 392 [(whether employed by him directly
or by or through a contractor)] the contributions which an employee may, if he so
desires, make under [* * *]393 Section 6 and the manner in which such contributions
may be recovered.
394 [2-A. The manner in which employees' contributions may be recovered by
2. The time within which the employees who are not members of the [Pension]399
Scheme under Section 6-A as it stood before the commencement of the Employees'
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1996 (hereafter in
this Schedule referred to as the amending Act) shall opt for the Pension Scheme.
3. The portion of employer's contribution to the Provident Fund which shall be
credited to the Pension Fund and the manner in which it is credited.
4. The minimum qualifying service for being eligible for pension and the manner in
which the employees may be granted the benefits of their past service under Section 6
-A as it stood before the commencement of the amending Act.
5. The regulation of the manner in which and the period of service for which no
contribution is received.
6. The manner in which employees' interest will be protected against default in
payment of contribution by the employer.
7. The manner in which the accounts of the Pension Fund shall be kept and
investment of moneys belonging to Pension Fund to be made subject to such pattern
of investment as may be determined by the Central Government.
8. The form in which an employee shall furnish particulars about himself and the
members of his family whenever required.
9. The forms, registers and records to be maintained in respect of employees,
required for the administration of the Pension Scheme.
10. The scale of pension and pensionary benefits and the conditions relating to
grant of such benefits to the employees.
11. The manner in which the exempted establishments have to pay contribution
towards the Pension Scheme and the submission of returns relating thereto.
12. The mode of disbursement of pension and arrangements to be entered into with
such disbursing agencies as may be specified for the purpose.
13. The manner in which the expenses for administering the Pension Scheme will
be met from the income of the Pension Fund.
14. Any other matter which is to be provided for in the Pension Scheme or which
may be necessary or proper for the purpose of implementation of the Pension
Scheme.]
400 [SCHEDULE IV
8. The manner in which the amount due to the nominee or the member of the
family of the employee under the scheme is to be paid including a provision that the
amount shall not be paid otherwise than in the form of a deposit in a savings bank
account, in the name of such nominee or member of family, in any corresponding new
bank specified in the First Schedule to the Banking Companies (Acquisition and
Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 (5 of 1970).
9. Any other matter which is to be provided for in the Employees' Deposit-linked
Insurance Scheme or which may be necessary or proper for the purpose of
implementing that Scheme.]
APPENDIX
LIST OF NON-FACTORY INDUSTRIES TO WHICH THE EMPLOYEEs' PROVIDENT
FUNDS ACT, 1952 HAS BEEN MADE APPLICABLE UNDER SECTION 1(3)(b)
Sl. No. Name of Industries Date of Notification No. and date
application
1 2 3 4
1. Plantations viz., tea (except in the 30-4-1957 S.R.O. 529, dated 13-2-
State of Assam, where the 1957
plantations are covered by a State
enactment), coffee, rubber,
cardamom and pepper.
2. Mines of iron ore, limestone, 30-11- S.R.O. 2705, dated 17-8-
manganese and gold. 1957 1957
3. Coffee curing establishments. 30-11- S.R.O. 3411, dated 16-10
1957 -1957
4. Road motor transport 30-4-1959 G.S.R. 399, dated 24-3-
establishments. 1959
5. Mica mines. 31-5-1960 G.S.R. 313, dated 5-3-
1960
6. Cane farms owned by the owner 31-12- G.S.R. 1458, dated 2-12-
or occupier of a sugar factory or 1961 1961
cultivated by such owner or
occupier.
7. (1) Hotels. 30-6-1961 G.S.R. 704, dated 16-5-
(2) Restaurants. 1961
8. Establishment engaged in the 30-6-1961 G.S.R. 706, dated 16-5-
storage or transport or distribution 1961
of petroleum or natural gas or
products of either petroleum or
natural gas.
9. (1) Cinemas including preview 31-7-1961 G.S.R. 827, dated 19-6-
theatres. 1961
(2) Film studios.
(3) Film production concerns.
(4) Distribution concerns dealing
with exposed films.
(5) Film processing laboratories.
10. (1) Plantation of tea (other than 31-7-1961 G.S.R. 1013, dated 29-7-
those in the State of Assam), and 1961
plantation of coffee, rubber,
cardamom and pepper.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 97 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2200.]
44. Brick industry. 30-11- G.S.R. 662(E), dated 27-
1980 11-1980.
45. Establishment engaged in 23-11- G.S.R. 611(E), dated 23-
stevedoring, loading and 1981 11-1981 (1982 CCL-III-
unloading of ships. 8).
46. Poultry Farming. 7-12-1981 G.S.R. 643(E), dated 7-
12-1981 (1982 CCL-III-
21).
47. Establishments engaged in ‘Cattle 7-12-1981 G.S.R. 644(E), dated 7-
feed’ industry. 12-1981 (1982 CCL-III-
21).
48. (i) any University; 6-3-1982 S.O. 986, dt. 19-2-1982
[Pub. in Gaz. of India, Pt.
II, S. 3(ii), dated 6-3-
1982.]
(ii) any college, whether or not
affiliated to a University;
(iii) any school, whether or not
recognised or aided by the Central
or a State Government;
(iv) any scientific institution;
(v) any institution in which
research in respect of any matter
is carried on;
(vi) any other institution in which
the activity of imparting
knowledge or training is
systematically carried on.
49. (i) Guar Gum factories; 1-4-1992 G.S.R. 170 dated 25-3-
1992 [Pub. in Gaz. of
India, Pt. II, S. 3(i),
dated 11-4-1992.]
(ii) Marble Mines; and
(iii) Diamond Saw Mills
50. (i) an establishment engaged in 1-4-2001 F. No. S-35016/1/97-SS.
rendering Courier services; II, dated 22-3-2001.
(ii) an establishment of aircraft or
airlines other than the aircraft or
airlines owned or controlled by the
Central or State Government;
(iii) an establishment engaged in
rendering cleaning and sweeping
services.
51. Any establishment engaged in 19-11- G.S.R. 401, dt. 10-11-
construction, maintenance, 2005 2005
operation and commercial activity
of Railways; other than Indian
Railways and other Railway
establishments owned and
controlled by Central or State
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 103 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Government.
52. Establishment engaged in 27-7-2006 S.O. 1190(E), dt. 27-7-
manufacture, marketing, servicing 2006
and usage of a computer [as
defined in clause (i) of sub-section
(1) of Section 2 of the Information
Technology Act (21 of 2000)]/or
deriving any form of output
therefrom/or employing it for any
type of processing services
including software product
companies, Internet and E-
Commerce Companies,
Information Technology Services
and Remote Maintenance
Companies, Research and
Development Companies, Systems
integrators, On-site Services
Companies and Off-shore Software
Development Companies etc.
53. Municipal Councils and Municipal 8-1-2011 S.O. 30(E), dt. 8-1-2011
Corporations constituted under
sub-clauses (b) and (c) of clause
(1) of Article 243-Q of the
Constitution of India.
54. All banks employing twenty or 10-2-2016 S.O. 444(E), dt. 10-2-
more number of persons as a class 2016
of establishment in respect of
those employees who are not
entitled to the benefit of
Contributory Provident Fund or old
age pension in accordance with
any scheme or rule framed by the
Central Government or the State
Government or by the respective
banks established under the
Banking Regulations Act, 1949
(10 of 1949).
55. Establishments, employing ten or 1-1-2020 S.O. 3962, dt. 31-10-
more persons and covered under 2019
the provisions of the erstwhile the
Jammu and Kashmir Employees'
Provident Funds and Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1961 (XV of 1961),
as it stood before its repeal by the
Jammu and Kashmir
Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of
2019).
———
1. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976 for “Family Pension Fund”.
2.
For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Gaz. of India, 1952, Pt. II, S. 2, pp. 67-69.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 104 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* In respect of the Amending Acts, Act 28 of 1963 came into force w.e.f. 30-11-1963, vide S.O. 3324, dt. 27-11
-1963, Act 40 of 1973 came into force w.e.f. 1-11-1973, vide S.O. 547(E), dt. 16-10-1973 and Act 99 of 1976
came into force on 1-8-1976 (Ss. 1-29 and 32 to 40) and 7-9-1976 (Ss. 30 and 31). Act 4 of 1986 came into
force on 15-5-1986 vide G.S.R. 764(E), dt. 15-5-1986; Act 33 of 1988 came into force on 1-8-1988 except
certain sections; Act 25 of 1996 came into force w.e.f. 16-11-1995; Act 10 of 1998 came into force on 22-9-
1997; Act 7 of 2017 came into force on 26-5-2017.
3. Subs. by S. 16 of Act 99 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976) for the words “and family pension fund” which had been
ins. by S. 12 of Act 16 of 1971 after the words “provident funds”. [1977, LLT-II A]
4.
The word “family” omitted by Act 25 of 1996, S. 2 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
5.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
6.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 17 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
7.
The words “except the State of Jammu and Kashmir” omitted by Act 34 of 2019, Ss. 95, 96 & Sch. V (w.e.f. 1
-1-2020).
8. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 2, for sub-section (3).
9.
Subs. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 2, for “fifty” (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
10.
Subs. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 2, for “fifty” (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
11. See Appendix for notifications.
12.
Subs. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 2, for “fifty” (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
13.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 2 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
14. Ins. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 2 (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
15.
Proviso deleted by Act 16 of 1971.
16.
Subs. by Act 22 of 1958, S. 2, for the former clause.
17. Ins. by Act 22 of 1965, S. 2 (w.e.f. 24-11-1964).
18. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 3 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
19. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 3 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
35. The existing cl. (ia) re-lettered as (i-c) by Act 99 of 1976, S. 18 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
36. Ins. by Act 25 of 1996, S. 3 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
37. Cls. (ka) and (kb) ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 3 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
38. Subs. by Act 16 of 1971, S. 14 (w.e.f. 23-4-1971).
39. Ins. by Act 25 of 1996, S. 3 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
40.
Subs. by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(a) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to substitution it read as:
‘(m) “Tribunal” means the Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 7-D.’.
41.
Ins. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 3 (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
42.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 5 for the original section.
43. Renumbered as sub-section (1) of S. 5 by Act 37 of 1953, S. 4.
44.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factories”.
45.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factories”.
46. Ins. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 4.
47. Sub-sections (1-A) and (1-B) added by Act 28 of 1963, S. 3 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
48.
Ins. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 4.
49. Added by Act 28 of 1963, S. 4 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
50. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 4 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
51.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 4 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
52. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 4 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
53. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 4 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
54. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 4 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
70.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 6 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
71. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 6 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
72.
Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 7 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
73.
Added by Act 28 of 1963, S. 4 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
74. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 8 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
[Link]. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 20 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976) for the words “and the Family Pension Scheme” which were
inserted by Act 16 of 1971, S. 17.
76.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
77. The brackets and figure “(1)” omitted by Act 28 of 1963, S. 5 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
78. Subs. by Act 10 of 1998, S. 2 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997) for “eight and one-third per cent”.
79.
Subs. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 4, for “and the dearness allowance” (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
80. Ins. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 5 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
81. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 9 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
82.
Subs. by Act 10 of 1998, S. 2 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997) for “eight and one-third per cent”.
83. Subs. by Act 48 of 1962 (w.e.f. 1-1-1963).
84. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 9 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
85.
Subs. by Act 10 of 1998, S. 2 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997) for “eight and one-third per cent”.
86. Subs. by Act 10 of 1998, S. 2 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997) for “ten per cent”.
87. Subs. by Act 48 of 1962, S. 2 (w.e.f. 1-1-1963).
88.
Original Explanation renumbered as (1) by S. 4, Act 46 of 1960 (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
89. Subs. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 5 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
90. Ins. by Act 46 of 1960, S. 4 (w.e.f. 31-12-1960).
91.
Subs. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 5 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
92. Sub-sections (2) and (3) deleted by Act 28 of 1963.
93. Published in the Gaz. of India, Extra., Pt. II, S. 3(ii), dt. 17th May, 1989, pp. 4-7, [S. 35011/9/88-SS. II].
94.
Subs. by S.O. 1837, dt. 29-6-1990.
95. Subs. by S.O. 1837, dt. 29-6-1990.
96. Ins. by S.O. 1837, dt. 29-6-1990.
97.
Subs. by S.O. 1837, dt. 29-6-1990.
98. Subs. by S.O. 126(E), dt. 1-3-1995 (w.e.f. 1-3-1995).
99.
Ins. by Noti. No. S.O. 1513(E), dated 18-5-2020.
100.
Subs. by Act 25 of 1996, S. 5 for Ss. 6-A & 6-B (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
101. Ins. by Act 99 of 1976 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
102. Omitted by Act 25 of 1996, S. 6 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
103.
Omitted by Act 25 of 1996, S. 6 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
104. Ins. by Act 4 of 1986 (w.e.f. 15-5-1986).
105. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 22 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 107 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
106.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
107.
Subs. by Act 4 of 1986 (w.e.f. 15-5-1986).
108. Added by Act 28 of 1963, S. 6 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
109.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 10 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
110.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
111. Omitted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 10 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
112.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 10 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
113. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 10 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
114. Subs. for sub-section (4) by Act 33 of 1988, S. 10 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
115.
Ss. 7-B to 7-Q inserted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 11 (w.e.f. 1-7-1997).
116. Subs. by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(b) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to substitution it read as:
“7-D. Employees' Provident Funds Appellate Tribunal.—(1) The Central Government may, by notification in
the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Appellate Tribunals to be known as the Employees' Provident
Funds Appellate Tribunal to exercise the powers and discharge the functions conferred on such Tribunal by
this Act and every such Tribunal shall have jurisdiction in respect of establishments situated in such area as
may be specified in the notification constituting the Tribunal.
(2) A Tribunal shall consist of one person only to be appointed by the Central Government.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Presiding Officer of a Tribunal (hereinafter referred
to as the Presiding Officer) unless he is, or has been, or is qualified to be,—
117. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-E. Term of office.—The Presiding Officer of a Tribunal shall hold office for a term of five years from the
date on which he enters upon his office or until he attains the age of sixty-two years, whichever is earlier.”.
118. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-F. Resignation.—(1) The Presiding Officer may, by notice in writing under his hand addressed to the
Central Government, resign his office:
Provided that the Presiding Officer shall, unless he is permitted by the Central Government to relinquish his
office sooner, continue to hold office until the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of such notice
or until a person duly appointed as his successor enters upon his office or until the expiry of his term of
office, whichever is the earliest.
(2) The Presiding Officer shall not be removed from his office except by an order made by the President on
the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity after an inquiry made by a Judge of the High Court in which
such Presiding Officer had been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of
being heard in respect of those charges.
(3) The Central Government may, by rules, regulate the procedure for the investigation of misbehaviour or
incapacity of the Presiding Officer.”.
119. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-G. Salary and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Presiding Officer.—The salary
and allowances payable to, and the other terms and conditions of service (including pension, gratuity and
other retirement benefits) of, the Presiding Officer shall be such as may be prescribed:
Provided that neither the salary and allowances nor the other terms and conditions of service of the
Presiding Officer shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.”.
120. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-H. Staff of Tribunal.—(1) The Central Government shall determine the nature and categories of the
officers and other employees required to assist a Tribunal in the discharge of its functions and provide the
Tribunal with such officers and other employees as it may think fit.
(2) The officers and other employees of a Tribunal shall discharge their functions under the general
superintendence of the Presiding Officer.
(3) The salaries and allowances and other conditions of service of the officers and other employees of a
Tribunal shall be such as may be prescribed.”.
121. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-M. Filling up of vacancies.—If, for any reason, a vacancy occurs in the office of the Presiding Officer,
the Central Government shall appoint another person in accordance with the provisions of this Act, to fill the
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 108 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vacancy and the proceedings may be continued before a Tribunal from the stage at which the vacancy is
filled.”.
122. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(c ) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“7-N. Finality of orders constituting a Tribunal.—No order of the Central Government appointing any person
as the Presiding Officer shall be called in question in any manner, and no act or proceeding before a Tribunal
shall be called in question in any manner on the ground merely of any defect in the constitution of such
Tribunal.”.
123. Subs. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 6, for the original section.
124. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3 for “a factory”.
125. Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 24 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
155.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
156.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 27 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
157.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 27 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
158. Added by Act 16 of 1971.
159.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
160. Subs. by Act 40 of 1973.
161. Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 27 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
162.
Ins. by Act 40 of 1973.
163. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 16 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
164. Subs. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 10, for the original section.
165.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “a factory”.
166. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 28 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
167. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 28 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
168.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 28 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
169. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 28 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
170. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 28 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
171.
Subs. by Act 16 of 1971, S. 24, for “or of any Scheme” (w.e.f. 23-4-1971).
172. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
173. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
174.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
175.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
176. Ins. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 11.
177.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “a factory”.
178. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
179. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
180.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
181. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 29 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
182. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
183.
Added by Act 28 of 1963.
184. The words “in relation to the Scheme” omitted by Act 37 of 1953, S. 1.
185. Subs. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 9, for “enter” (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
186.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
187. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
188. Ins. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 9.
189.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
190. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 110 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The existing sub-section (2-A) renumbered as sub-section (2-B) and a new sub-section (2-A) added by Act
193.
16 of 1971.
194. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
195.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
196. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
197. Ins. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 9 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963) which renumbered by Act 16 of 1971.
198.
See now the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
199. Ins. by Act 16 of 1971.
[Link] S. 94 of the (new) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) instead of S. 98 of the (old) Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1898.
201. Omitted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 17 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
214.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 18 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
215. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 18 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
216. Words “or of fine only in lieu of imprisonment” omitted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 18 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
217. Subs. by Act 40 of 1973, S. 4.
218. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 30 (w.e.f. 7-9-1976).
219. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
262.
The word “or” omitted by Act 10 of 1998, S. 5 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997).
263. Omitted by Act 10 of 1998, S. 5 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997). Prior to omission cl. (d) read:
“(d) to any other establishment newly set up, until the expiry of a period of three years from the date on
which such establishment is, or has been, set up.”
264.
Omitted by Act 10 of 1998, S. 5 (w.e.f. 22-9-1997). Prior to omission the Explanation read:
“Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that an establishment shall not be deemed
to be newly set up merely by reason of a change in its location.”
265. Ins. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 15.
266.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factories”.
267.
Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 21 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
268.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factories”.
269.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
270.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
271.
Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 22 (w.e.f. a date to be notified).
272.
Subs. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 16, for the original section.
273. Subs. for the words “exempt from the operation” by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
274.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
275.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
276. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
277.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
278.
Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
279. Explanation omitted by Act 28 of 1963, S. 11 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
280. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
Sub-sections (1-A), (1-B) and (1-C) subs. for sub-section (1-A) by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-
281.
1988).
282. Subs. by Act 25 of 1996, S. 7 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
283. Subs. by Act 94 of 1956, S. 3, for “factory”.
284.
Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
285.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
286. Subs. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 11 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
287.
Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
288. Omitted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
289. Omitted by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
290.
Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
291. Omitted by Act 16 of 1971.
292.
Ins. by Act 16 of 1971.
293.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
294. Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
295. Subs. by Act 16 of 1971.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 113 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
296.
Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
297. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
298.
Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
299. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
300. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
301. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
302.
Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 34 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
303. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
304. Ins. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
305.
Subs. by Act 16 of 1971.
306. Subs. by Act 33 of 1988, S. 23 (w.e.f. 1-10-1988).
307. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
308.
Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
309. The words, “as well as the employees' contribution”, omitted by Act 25 of 1996, S. 7 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
310. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
311.
Subs. by G.S.R. 853(E), dt. 29-10-2003 (w.e.f. 30-10-2003).
312. Ins. by G.S.R. 336(E), dt. 4-5-2012 (w.e.f. 4-5-2012).
313. Vide Gaz. of India, Pt. II, S. 3(ii), dt. 23-11-1963, p. 4077.
314.
Vide Gaz. of India, Pt. II, S. 3(ii), dt. 23-9-1967, p. 3456.
315. Ins. by Noti. No. S.O. 28(E), dated 4-1-2021 (w.r.e.f. 11-12-2019).
316. Ins. by S.O. 1709(E), dt. 29-4-2021 (w.r.e.f. 15-3-2021).
317. Subs. for “under this category no. (v)” by S.O. 1709(E), dt. 29-4-2021.
318. Subs. for “under this category” by S.O. 1709(E), dt. 29-4-2021.
319. Ins. by S.O. 1709(E), dt. 29-4-2021.
320. As amended by S.O. 1051, dt. 2-4-1987.
321. Ins. by Act 28 of 1963, S. 12 (w.e.f. 30-11-1963).
322. Ins. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 35 (w.e.f. 1-8-1976).
323.
Ins. by Act 40 of 1973, S. 8 (w.e.f. 1-11-1973).
324. Subs. by Act 99 of 1976, S. 31 (w.e.f. 7-9-1976).
325. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
326. Ss. 18 and 18-A subs. for original S. 18 by Act 33 of 1988, S. 24 (w.e.f. 1-8-1988).
327. Subs. for “Family Pension” by Act 25 of 1996, S. 4 (w.e.f. 16-11-1995).
328.
Subs. by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(d) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to substitution it read as:
“18-A. Presiding Officer and other officers to be public servants.—The Presiding Officer of a Tribunal, its
officers and other employees, the authorities referred to in Section 7-A and every Inspector shall be deemed
to be public servants within the meaning of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code.”.
329. Ss. 19 and 19-A subs. by Act 37 of 1953, S. 17, for the original S. 19.
330. Subs. by Act 16 of 1971, S. 29 for “or any scheme”.
SCC Online Web Edition, © 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Page 114 Friday, January 20, 2023
Printed For: Veer 1020192061, Himachal Pradesh National Law University
SCC Online Web Edition: [Link]
© 2023 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The powers of the Central Government under S. 1(5) have been delegated to the State Governments of : 1.
333.
Andhra Pradesh, 2. Assam, 3. Bihar, 4. Gujarat, 5. Kerala, 6. Madhya Pradesh, 7. Madras, 8. Maharashtra, 9.
Mysore, 10. Orissa, 11. Punjab, 12. Rajasthan, 13. Uttar Pradesh, and 14. West Bengal, vide S.O. 32, dt. 30-12-
1961.
334.
Ss. 20, 21 and 22 subs. for S. 19-A by Act 33 of 1988, S. 25 (w.e.f. 1-7-1997).
335. Omitted by Act 7 of 2017, S. 159(e) (w.e.f. 26-5-2017). Prior to omission it read as:
“(a) the salary and allowances and other terms and conditions of service of the Presiding Officer and the
employees of a Tribunal;”.
336. The words “or production” omitted by Act 37 of 1953, S. 18.
337. These industries were added by S.R.O. 1566, dt. 4-7-1956 (w.e.f. 31-7-1956).
338. These industries were added by S.R.O. 2026, dt. 3-9-1956 (w.e.f. 30-9-1956).
339. Added by S.R.O. 1976, dt. 8-6-1957 (w.e.f. 31-7-1957).