Guideline

HIRAC

This Guideline relates to OHS Procedure –

Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control (HIRAC)

1. Selection
The first step of the HIRAC review is to select an area, task or activity. Priority should be given to areas,
tasks or activities thought to present special risks, based on:
• past experience (e.g. accidents, near-misses, complaints)
• concerns expressed by staff
• requirements of legislation or University policies and procedures (e.g. workplace changes)
• requests from the various Health and Safety Teams, etc.

2. Hazard Identification
Hazards can be grouped under various categories, as listed below. The items listed under each category
are provided as examples.

Bio-mechanical and Postural

Note: where the main hazards associated with an activity or task relate to manual handling, a special HIRAC
form should be used. It is available at: http://www.federation.edu.au/staff/working-at-feduni/risk,-health-and-
safety/forms-and-templates

Repetitive or sustained postures, movements or forces as listed below for more than thirty minutes at a
time, or for more than two hours over a workday
o Excessive bending or twisting of back or o Twisting, turning, grabbing, picking or
neck in any direction wringing actions with fingers, hands or
o Working with hand(s) above shoulders arms
o Reaching to front/side more than 30cm o Working with fingers close together or
from body wide apart
o Reaching behind body o Very fast movements
o Squatting, kneeling, crawling, semi-lying o Excessive bending of wrist(s)
or jumping o Carrying with one hand or one side of the
o Standing with most of body weight on one body
leg o Pushing, pulling, dragging, holding or
restraining

High force actions as listed below

o Lifting, lowering or carrying heavy loads o Awkward grips
o Applying uneven, fast or jerky forces o Throwing, catching, hitting, kicking or
o Sudden/unexpected forces jumping
o Pushing/pulling objects hard to move or o Holding, restraining or supporting person,
stop animal or heavy object

Physical Environment and Workplace Design

Poor housekeeping, uncontained spillages or wastes
Uneven or slippery work surfaces
Obstacles in passageways, near equipment, risk of collision with stationary objects, etc
Inadequate work platforms, stairs, ladders, guardrails, harnesses, etc, for work at height
Personnel access within two metres of edge of roof, high place of work, etc
Unprotected openings or gaps in walkways and platforms
Poor lighting
Exposure to harmful noise levels
Confusing or inadequate labelling of controls
Mismatch between plant, workplace, office workstation design, activity or task and user physical
characteristics (height, strength, speed, mobility, fitness, etc)

Warning – Uncontrolled when printed! The current version of this document is kept on the University
website.
Authorised by: University Health and Safety Policy Committee
Document Owner: Manager – Risk, Health and Safety Current Version: 01/12/2021
Page 1 of 4 Review Date: 31/12/2025
 Guideline
HIRAC

Body parts coming in contact with hot components during testing, inspection, operation, maintenance,
cleaning or repair
Exposure to camp fires and hot items from fires
Fall or collapse of ground, materials, plant, structures, etc
Exposure to extremely cold materials or components (e.g. dry ice)
Exposure to radiation (ionising and non-ionising, lasers)
Entry into cool rooms

Mechanical
Hair, clothing, jewellery, rags, etc, liable to become entangled in moving components
Uncontrolled or unexpected movement of machinery, components, work pieces, vehicles or loads
Inability to slow, stop or immobilise machines, vehicles
Body parts coming in contact with moving, sharp, hot, or "live" components during testing, inspection,
operation, maintenance, cleaning or repair
Possibility of traffic accident
Persons or body parts trapped or sheared between moving component and fixed plant, materials or
structures
Persons pushed, pulled or thrown off plant, structures
Machines, components, or materials disintegrating (e.g. grinding wheels)
Persons being injured by damaged, poorly maintained or unguarded equipment (including electrical
components)
Components, work pieces, fluids, etc, being ejected

Electrical
Contact with "live" components during testing, inspection, operation, maintenance, cleaning or repair
Contact with overhead power lines
Contact with underground power cables
Explosion or ignition of electrical components, etc
Unauthorised access to electrical services, switchboards, controls, etc

Chemicals and Toxicity

Explosion or ignition of gases, vapours, liquids, dusts, etc
Exposure to toxic concentrations of chemicals (skin, inhalation, ingestion, etc)
Exposure to oxygen-depleted atmospheres
Damage to gas lines, compressed gas cylinders, chemical storage containers, etc

Biological and Human

Exposure to venomous or dangerous animals
Exposure to toxic natural substances (plant, mushrooms, gases, etc)
Exposure to (potentially) infectious substances
Accidental collision with another person
Assault by another person (Note: where workplace violence is being reviewed, special risk assessment
forms should be used. They are available from Risk, Health and Safety, Ext 9370).

Organisational and Procedural Arrangements

Insufficient first-aid equipment or trained personnel
Insufficient evacuation, emergency or rescue planning and facilities
Access to hazardous equipment by unauthorised or untrained people
Insufficient job rotation, rest breaks
Inappropriate, insufficient or poorly maintained personal protective equipment

Psycho-social Environment and Task Design

Insufficient consideration given to the probability of human error and its consequences
Lack of clarity in work roles of employee(s)
Lack of control or recognition in work roles of employees
Warning – Uncontrolled when printed! The current version of this document is kept on the University
website.
Authorised by: University Health and Safety Policy Committee
Document Owner: Manager – Risk, Health and Safety Current Version: 01/12/2021
Page 2 of 4 Review Date: 31/12/2025
 Guideline
HIRAC

Mismatch between task demands and workers'/people's behaviour or capabilities

Insufficient consideration given to consultation prior to workplace changes

Natural Environment
Drowning
Bushfires
Persons becoming lost or ill in remote locations
Possibility of being engulfed in loose or crumbling ground
Exposure to extreme environmental conditions (hot, cold, dry, wet, snowy, stormy, etc)
Possibility of tree limbs falling
Lightning in exposed locations

3. Risk Assessment
Risk assessments are based on two key factors:
• the consequence of any injury/illness resulting from the hazard, and
• the likelihood that the injury/illness will actually occur.

CONSEQUENCE

Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Severe

Almost Certain Medium High High Extreme Extreme

LIKELIHOOD

Likely Medium Medium High High Extreme

Possible Low Medium Medium High High

Unlikely Low Medium Medium Medium High

Rare Low Low Low Medium Medium

For further details and definitions on conducting a risk assessment, refer to the University’s Risk Assessment
Guideline.

4. Risk Control
Urgent action is required for risks assessed as Extreme. The actions required may include:
• instructions for the immediate end of the work, process, activity, etc
• isolation of the hazard until more permanent measures can be implemented.

Actions taken to address an Extreme risk must be documented on a Hazard/Near-Miss Report form.

Documented control plans with responsibilities and completion dates are required for High and Medium risks.
(Refer to HIRAC Report available at: http://www.federation.edu.au/staff/working-at-feduni/risk,-health-and-
safety/forms-and-templates)

The risk control hierarchy ranks risk control measures in decreasing order of effectiveness. Risk control
measures should always aim as high in the list as practicable. Control of any given risk generally involves
several measures drawn from the various options (except if the hazard is eliminated).

Warning – Uncontrolled when printed! The current version of this document is kept on the University
website.
Authorised by: University Health and Safety Policy Committee
Document Owner: Manager – Risk, Health and Safety Current Version: 01/12/2021
Page 3 of 4 Review Date: 31/12/2025
 Guideline
HIRAC

Risk Control Hierarchy:

A. Elimination of hazard: examples include the proper disposal of redundant items of equipment that
contain substances such as asbestos or PCBs, the removal of excess quantities of chemical
accumulated over time in a laboratory, etc. The elimination of hazards is 100% effective.

B. Substitution of hazard: examples include the replacement of solvent-based printing inks with water-
based ones, of asbestos insulation or fire-proofing with synthetic fibres or rockwool, the use of
titanium dioxide white pigment instead of lead white, etc. The effectiveness of substitution is wholly
dependent on the choice of replacement.

C. Engineering controls: examples include the installation of machine guards on hazardous equipment,
the provision of local exhaust ventilation over a process area releasing noxious fumes, fitting a
muffler on a noisy exhaust pipe, etc.

D. Administrative controls: include training and education, job rotation to share the load created by
demanding tasks, planning, scheduling certain jobs outside normal working hours to reduce general
exposure (e.g. planning demolition and building works during summer recess), early reporting of
signs and symptoms, instructions and warnings, etc. Administrative control measures typically
require significant resources to be maintained over long periods of time for continuing levels of
effectiveness.

E. Personal protective equipment (PPE): includes safety glasses and goggles, earmuffs and earplugs,
hard hats, toe-capped footwear, gloves, respiratory protection, aprons, etc. Research has shown
that the effectiveness of personal protective equipment in realistic work situations is quite low. PPE
is therefore best seen as a “last line of defence” against hazards to be used in conjunction with other
risk control measures.

Warning – Uncontrolled when printed! The current version of this document is kept on the University
website.
Authorised by: University Health and Safety Policy Committee
Document Owner: Manager – Risk, Health and Safety Current Version: 01/12/2021
Page 4 of 4 Review Date: 31/12/2025