Scribd
Upload
174 views1 page

CodeWeek Bootcamp Final Assignment Rubric

The document provides a rubric for assessing final assignments for a CodeWeek bootcamp. It lists four assessment areas: description of activity, type of activity, age group, and coding/computational thinking. For each area, it describes two performance levels - level 2 for meeting expectations and level 1 for not meeting expectations. Reviewers are asked to evaluate assignments based on these areas and provide constructive feedback.

Uploaded by

Cana Monica
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
174 views1 page

CodeWeek Bootcamp Final Assignment Rubric

The document provides a rubric for assessing final assignments for a CodeWeek bootcamp. It lists four assessment areas: description of activity, type of activity, age group, and coding/computational thinking. For each area, it describes two performance levels - level 2 for meeting expectations and level 1 for not meeting expectations. Reviewers are asked to evaluate assignments based on these areas and provide constructive feedback.

Uploaded by

Cana Monica
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CodeWeek Bootcamp

FINAL ASSIGNMENT RUBRIC

Go through each of the assessment areas and identify to what extent the final assignment activity meets expectations (level 2 =
meets expectations and level 1 = does not meet expectations).
Please note that, if you select Level 1, the participant in question will not be awarded a course certificate.

When reviewing your peer’s activity try to address the following questions: what works, what can be improved and what is
interesting. Please make sure to include constructive feedback that allows the author of the activity to improve their work.

ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCE LEVEL AND DESCRIPTORS


AREAS
Level 2: Meeting expectations Level 1: Not meeting expectations
Description of There is a description of the activity including its goals, There is no description of the activity OR it is not
activity materials required, and steps to take. It is clear what the clear enough.
activity is about, what the objectives are and what skills
and competencies students will develop (coding,
computational thinking).

Type of activity The activity suits the modality or modalities of instruction The activity is not suited to be delivered through the
chosen: face to face, fully remote (online) or/ and hybrid. modality or modalities of instruction chosen.
That is, the activity can effectively be delivered through
the proposed modality.
Age group The activity is appropriate for the age of students. The activity is too complicated for the age of
students.

Coding and The activity addresses the development of coding The activity does not address the development
computational or computational thinking. of coding or computational thinking.
thinking

@CodeWeekEU | #CodeWeekBootcamp | codeweek.eu


1

You might also like