Crop production is a major component of the country’s

agricultural sector. Specifically, cereal crops account for a large

share of both total land area and output. From the total area of

land, 79.88% is covered by cereals crops such as teff, maize,

sorghum, and wheat. Teff accounts for 22.95% of the area of

land and is followed by maize, which is 16.91% of the land.

Cereal crops accounted for 86.68% of the total agricultural

production. Teff production accounts for 16.76% of cereal

crop production [7]. Teff is a cereal crop that is widely grown in

Ethiopia with an annual area of about 2.8 million hectares. +is

crop has properties that are particularly useful to both pro-

ducers and consumers. It is the most expensive grain grown in

Ethiopia and an attractive cash crop for farmers. Ethiopia has a

good chance of ensuring food security, poverty reduction, and

economic growth by stimulating teff production and exports

by adopting teff technologies [8]. Fikadu et al. [9] stated that

teff has many benefits and high nutritional value for baking in

jera and well-known traditional food in Ethiopia. +e income

obtained from teff is much higher than income obtained from

other cereals crops and even 34% higher than income obtained

from coffee, and it is the major export crop in Ethiopia [10].

Teff yields are low due to low use of modern agricultural

inputs, traditional sowing methods, lack of access to market

information, postharvest losses, and lack of high-yielding

farmers use a variety of adaptation strategies, including

changing fertilizer, crop variety, pesticide, seed quality,

water storage, farm diversification, planting shade trees,

irrigation practices, off-farm activities, permanent and

temporary migration, and asset sales [12]. In different re-

gions, there is evidence that the adoption of row planting,

pesticide, insect side, fertilizer, improved seed, and herbicide

for teff production is very low at the national and regional

levels [13]. +e low prevalence of farmers’ adoption deci-

sions is often determined by socioeconomic, institutional,

demographic, and psychological factors [14, 15]. However,

in most rural areas, Ethiopian farmers are adopting a single,

mixed technology instead of all existing methods [14].

+e contribution of this study to the existing literature is

fourfold. First, many researches have conducted on the

determinants of agricultural technology adoption in dif-

ferent parts of the country and in different types of crops, for

instance [6, 16–20]. However, this study examined the de-

terminants of modern agricultural technology adoption for

teff production in Minjar Shenkora woreda. Second, limited

studies have been conducted on the impact of agricultural

technology adoption on household income and expenditure

in different parts of the country, for example [21–23].

However, this study aims to examine the determinants of

in the study area. +ird, most of the studies employed the

logit model, Tobit and Ordinarily List Square, and pro-

pensity score matching, for example [6, 15, 21, 22]. But, the

scanty study employed a multinomial logit model to estimate

agricultural technology adoption on other crops in different

parts of the region, for example [24–26]. +ough, this study

employed a multinomial logit model to estimate the de-

terminants of modern agricultural technology adoption for

teff production in the study area. Fourth, most of the studies

relied heavily on substantiating a single agricultural tech-

nology decision and did not take into account the com-

plementarity of multiple agricultural technologies adoption

decisions, for example [15, 27, 28]. However, this study tries

to use comprehensive multiple agricultural technologies

with the specific crop. +erefore, the application of the

model of applying multiple agricultural technologies to teff

production is the main contribution of the study. Finally,

given the significant knowledge and research gaps, this study

aimed to examine the determinants of modern agricultural

adoption for teff production in Minjar Shenkora woreda,

North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Empirical Studies and the Conceptual Framework.

Different studies have been undertaken by scholars to un-

nology adoption for teff production. +e following table

shows different related empirical literature (see Table 1).

2.2. Conceptual Framework. An empirical review of the

literature on technology adoption in Ethiopia reveals that

the various factors that influence technology adoption can be

grouped into the following four broad categories factors

related to the demographic characteristics of the farmers,

factors related to the economic aspects, institutional factors,

and infrastructural factors. +e conceptual framework is

presented in Figure 1 as follows [33].

3. Methodology of the Study

3.1. Study Area Profile. +is study was mainly focused on

and conducted in the Minjar Shenkora district, one of 24

woredas located in the northern area of Shewa, in the

southern part of the Amhara region. +e geographical lo-

cation of the study area extended from 8 °42′46′′ N to 9 °7′37′′

N latitude and from 39 °12′57′′ E to 39° 46′53′′E longitude.

Minjar Shenkora district, located farther to the southern part

of the North Shewa Zone, is bounded by Hagere Mareym

and Berehet wearda to the north, and the remaining

boundary of Minjar Shenkora is shared with parts of Oromia

to the west, south, and east. +e study area is located to the

south towards Debre Berhan, the administrative town of the

North Shewa region at a distance of 260 km. Minjar

Addis Ababa, with a distance of 130 km between them [34].

+e district includes 29 kebeles, of which 27 kebeles are part

of a rural area. Regardless of their region, Balchi and Ararti

are the only two towns located in Minjar Shenkora district.

+e population of this region is 128,879 people, of which

66,918 are men and 61,961 are women, but 12,237 are city

residents. +ere are 29,359 households living in the district

[35]. Of the total area of 159,682.9 hectares of land, 55,860.38

hectares of land is arable. Minjar Shenkora district is covered

with flat reliefs with relatively flat surfaces. Due to the very

low inclination, this area has great potential for the appli-

cation of modern agricultural mechanization, minimizing

soil erosion, and waterlogging and can be affected when

2 Advances in Agriculture

Table 1: Empirical literature review.

Author (year) Location Method Result

[29] Minjar shenkora woreda Multinomial logit (MNL)

model

+e result from MNL analysis showed that age of the

household, farmers’ experience, total annual income,

access to credit, training, and perception are those

variables that positively and significantly influenced

the likelihood of adoption of teff row planting among

farmers whereas education level, farming experience,

perception towards row planting positively and

significantly influenced the intensity of adoption of

teff row planting. On the other hand, while

landholding size negatively affected the intensity of

adoption of teff row planting, the age of household

head and land holding size negatively and

significantly influenced the adoption of teff row

planting.

Fahad and

Wang [1]

Charsadda, Peshawar, Mardan, and

Nowshera of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa

(KP) province of Pakistan

Contingent valuation

(CV) method

+e study’s findings revealed that farm households in

the study area faced a variety of challenges in

adopting certain adaptation measures to deal with

climate variability, including a labor shortage,

insecure land tenure, lack of market access, poverty,

lack of governmental support, lack of access to assets,

a lack of water sources, a lack of credit sources, and a

lack of knowledge and information. +e findings of

this study provide helpful information to those in

Dalango and

Tadesse [30]

Southern Ethiopia, gena district in

Dawro zone

Heckman two-stage

model

In the first stage of probit regression, results of the

study show that the adoption decision of chemical

fertilizer use was driven by factors such as farm size,

size of family, family labor, education, access to

credit, access to information, and distance to the near

market place. In the second stage, the intensification

of chemical fertilizer application was influenced by

the membership to cooperative, availability of

extension service, access to credit, size of farm land,

size of a family member, family labor, educational

status, and sex of head. +e policies that expand the

accessibility of credit service, dissemination of

productive agricultural technology information, and

creating the opportunity of education for farm house

hold have the potential to increase the chance of

chemical fertilizer adoption decisions and strengthen

the level of adoption among smallholder farmers.

[31] Mlali ward, Tanzania Descriptive and

Results revealed that respondents’ education level,

family size, farming experience, availability of

sunflower market, and frequency of contacting

extension officers significantly influenced the

adoption of sunflower farming innovations.

However, the sex of the respondent, respondent’s age

(years), respondent’s marital status, and livestock

ownership did not significantly influence the

adoption of sunflower farming innovations.

[27] Toke kutaye district, oromia regional

state

Descriptive statistics and

econometric model

(tobit)

+e model result revealed that variables such as farm

size, off-farm income, and livestock asset were

positively and significantly influenced agricultural

adoptions.

Advances in Agriculture 3

pouring water. +e longitudinal extent of the study area is

home to three agro-climatic zones Kola, Woinadega, and

Dega [36]. +e soil is Vertisol type having clay textural class.

+e area has annual rainfall ranging between 800 and

1000 mm [37].
3.2. Sources and Method of Data Collection. +e study used

both primary and secondary data. Primary data were col-

lected through self-administered structured questionnaires

from rural households whereas secondary data were col-

lected from Minjar Agriculture Office Shenkora woreda,

publish articles, and books.

3.3. Sampling Technique and Sample Size Determination.

+e data were collected from households who are living in

Minjar Shenkora woreda. A multistage sampling procedure

was employed in this study. First, Minjar Shenkora woreda

was purposefully selected based on maximum teff arable

land and is well known for its teff production from the

districts of the North Shewa Zone. In the second phase, 4

Kebeles (Kebele (Amharic word) means the lowest ad-

ministrative unit in Ethiopia [38]) namely Choba, Amora

Bet, Kombolcha, and Bolo Giorgis were randomly selected

from 19 rural Kebeles of Minjar Shenkora woreda. +irdly,

simple random sampling was used to select 362 households

from each selected Kebeles. +e study employed Yamane’s

formula to determine the sample size [39]. +e formula is

expressed as

n N

1 + N e2

􏼐 􏼑, (1)

n 3860/1 + 3860(0.0025) 362; where n is the sample

margin of error. Using a 5% level of error or 95% level of

confidence 362 sample sizes will take from households who

are engaging in farming through a random sampling

technique. Finally, proportionate sampling was utilized to

determine the sample size for each stratum, with Choba, 33,

Amora Bet, 122, Kombolcha, 74, and Bolo Giorgis 133

samples selected from each stratum.

3.4. Method of Data Presentation and Analysis. After the

collected data are coded and edited, it is presented in tabular

form. In this study, descriptive and econometric data

analysis techniques were used. In the descriptive analysis of

this study, statistical measures of mean and percentage were

used to summarize the demographic, socioeconomic, and

institutional characteristics of the respondents. In this study,

the multinomial logit model was used to estimate the de-

terminants of the adoption of modern agricultural tech-

nologies for teff production in the study area.

3.5. Econometrics Model Specification. +e choice of model to

study the determinants of adoption is based on the amount of

technology used for the study. +e choice model describes the

functional relationship between the probability of applying

some technology and different explanatory variables. +is

study used a multinomial logit model to estimate demo-

graphic, socioeconomic, and institutional factors that affect

for teff production. On this basis, the present study states the

standard multinomial logit model specified as follows:

Adoption β0 + β1 sex + β2 age + β3 mstr + β4 educ

+ β5 cultivated landsize + β6 off

− farm participation + β7 tlu

+ β8 landtenur + β9 distance frommarket

+ β10 credit + β11 extension visit + β12 lan tenure

+ β13 activehhd + ∈ .

(2)Demographic factors

Age

Sex

Education

Marital status

Active household

Economic Factors

Off-farm participation

Cultivated land size

Tropical livestock unit

Institutional Factors

Credit Access

Extension contact

Land Tenure Security

Infrastructural Factors

Distance from market

Agricultural

technology

adoption for

teff production

Figure 1: Conceptual framework. Source: adopted from.

Table 1: Continued.

Author (year) Location Method Result

[32] Duna district Using binary logit

regression

Results revealed that land holding, livestock

ownership, and off-farm income use had all

significant positive associations with households’

adoption decisions

[21] West wellega, gulliso district Binary logit model and

PSM model

+e selection result showed that farm size, livestock

asset, and the perception of farmers about the cost of

inputs and off-farm income influence the adoption

decision of farm households positively and

significantly

4 Advances in Agriculture

+e dependent variable (adoption) is modern agricul-

tural technology adoption for teff production just catego-

rized as nonadopter, improved seed, herbicide, row planting,

improved seed + herbicide + row planting. +e parameters

for this study are gender (sex), age (age), marital status

(mstr), education (educ), cultivated land Size, off-farm

participation, livestock unit (tlu), market distance (dis-

tancefrommkt), credit access (credit), extension visit

(extensionvisit), land tenure security (lantenur), and active

household member(activehhd), and ε represents the error

term. +erefore, the probability of modern technology

adoption j (j 0 nonadopter; j 1 only improved seed; j 2

only herbicide; j 3 only row planting; j 4 improved seed

herbicide; j 5 improved seed + row planting; j 6 combi-

nations of improved seed, herbicide, and row planting) is

given by the following multinomial logit model:

prob(Yi j) exp χij′βj