Personal Fat Threshold
Personal Fat Threshold
1042/CS20140553
*Magnetic Resonance Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
†Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, U.K.
www.clinsci.org
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is frequently regarded as a disease of obesity and its occurrence in individuals of normal
body mass index (BMI) is often regarded as indicating a non-obesity-related subtype. However, the evidence for such
a distinct, common subtype is lacking. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) cohort of people
diagnosed with T2DM in the 1970s and 1980s had a median BMI of only 28 kg/m2 . UKPDS data form the basis of
current understanding of the condition even though one in three of those studied had a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2 .
BMI, though, is a population measure and not a rigid personal guide. Weight loss is considered de rigueur for
treating obese diabetic individuals, but it is not usually considered for those deemed to have a normal BMI. Given
the new evidence that early T2DM can be reversed to normal glucose tolerance by substantial weight loss, it is
important to explain why non-overweight people respond to this intervention as well as obese individuals. We
hypothesize that each individual has a personal fat threshold (PFT) which, if exceeded, makes likely the
development of T2DM. Subsequent weight loss to take the individual below their level of susceptibility should allow
return to normal glucose control. Crucially, the hypothesized PFT is independent of BMI. It allows both
understanding of development of T2DM in the non-obese and remission of diabetes after substantial weight loss in
people who remain obese by definition. To illustrate this concept, we present the distribution curve of BMI at
diagnosis for the UKPDS cohort, together with a diagram explaining individual behaviour within the population. The
concept of PFT is of practical benefit in explaining the onset of diabetes and its logical management to the
non-obese majority of people with T2DM.
Clinical Science
INTRODUCTION however, has not always been obvious. In the 1970s, when the
average weight of the UK population was considerably less than
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a condition of relative insulin defi- at present, the Whitehall study showed only a small association
ciency, in which hyperglycaemia develops when a person’s β-cell between obesity and T2DM [6]. At that time it was considered
function is no longer sufficient to meet their insulin requirement that there was no major effect of obesity on the development of
[1,2]. Insulin resistance is common in people with T2DM and ex- T2DM [6–8].
acerbated by obesity, but individuals with normal weight can de- This article examines the scientific basis for the belief that the
velop T2DM if their β-cell function is sufficiently compromised pathophysiology of T2DM may be driven by individual weight
[3]. The interplay between the degree of insulin resistance and gain, rather than achieving a population-derived body mass in-
the level of β-function is likely to contribute to the heterogeneity dex (BMI) threshold and that this may be reversible. It considers
of T2DM presentation, especially in non-obese individuals [4,5]. data on populations and individuals and examines possible ex-
The identification of monogenic causes of maturity onset dia- planations of the phenomena observed. We hypothesize that each
betes of youth (MODY), which are unrelated to obesity, has rein- individual could have a personal fat threshold (PFT) which de-
forced the notion that ‘classical’ T2DM is linked to obesity and termines their susceptibility to developing T2DM, in relation to
that all non-obese people may probably have a different diabetes their degree of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity. Gaining
subtype. The perceived relationship between T2DM and obesity, sufficient weight to cross their PFT will trigger the condition,
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MODY, maturity onset diabetes of youth; PFT, personal fat threshold; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes
Study
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society 405
R. Taylor and R. R. Holman
406
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society
Normal weight individuals who develop Type 2 diabetes: the personal fat threshold
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society 407
R. Taylor and R. R. Holman
but behave according to whether they are carrying more fat than a first-phase insulin response can be used as the most direct index
they can tolerate individually. Personal excess fat is overlooked of reversal or return of the diabetic pathophysiology. It has been
in less heavy individuals when population metrics are applied to postulated that this is a consequence of the excess fat acting at
individuals. the level of the β-cells [31,48,49].
Our hypothesis predicts that β-cell insulin responses in normal
BMI and obese individuals with T2DM who have just completed
an 8-week low-calorie liquid diet will be similar and identically
MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE PFT
affected by exposure to excess lipid metabolites. Both first-phase
and total insulin secretory responses could be tested on two sep-
The physiological mechanisms underlying an individual’s sus-
arate days, once after overnight intralipid infusion and once after
ceptibility to develop T2DM at a particular weight must be con-
saline infusion. Matched controls with no personal or family
sidered. Four critical factors may be identified. First, accumula-
history of T2DM would also be studied. The lack of effect of
tion of liver fat can now be seen as pivotal [31], but the extent
triacylglycerol (triglyceride) over-provision on insulin secretion
of this varies considerably at any weight or BMI [37]. Secondly,
in those not susceptible to diabetes and the distinct effect upon
the susceptibility of individuals to develop hepatic insulin res-
people at risk of T2DM has been demonstrated previously [50].
istance at any given level of liver fat accumulation is variable
The stepped insulin secretion tests described by Lim et al. [30]
even though the biochemical mechanism is understood [38]. The
should be used in order that the first phase and total insulin re-
variable effect is illustrated by one known genetic influence in
sponses could be quantified directly. We hypothesize that in both
that individuals with the G-allelle of patatin-like phospholipase
normal BMI and obese groups, β-cell function will be simil-
3 gene have a higher liver fat level but normal hepatic insulin
arly returned to the diabetic state of absent first phase insulin
sensitivity [39]. It is likely that complex polygenetic traits also
response by over-provision of triacylglycerol and that there will
contribute to this. The third and fourth factors relate to the same
be no such effect upon the controls. The return of a normal
considerations in the pancreas: extent and susceptibility to ad-
first-phase response from the characteristically absent response
verse effects of fat accumulation. Pancreas fat levels are raised in
in T2DM remains the most striking aspect of Lim’s paper and
T2DM [30,40] and fall as normal insulin secretion is restored by
this is the essence of being above or below the PFT.
a very low calorie diet [30]. It is known that chronic exposure to
excess fatty acids decreases glucose-mediated insulin secretion
by the β-cells [41]. However, there is considerable overlap in
pancreas fat levels between normal and Type 2 diabetic individu-
als suggesting differing susceptibility [31]. Extent of visceral
DISCUSSION
fat accumulation is a surrogate marker for intra-organ fat ex-
cess, but is not pathophysiologically related to adverse metabolic
The PFT concept is of practical use in explaining the need for
consequences [42,43]. Overall, the PFT for any one person is
weight loss to individuals with T2DM, even if they are not obese.
hypothesized to be determined both by extent of intra-hepatic
For any one person, the degree of susceptibility to the adverse
and intra-pancreatic fat accumulation and by susceptibility to the
effects of excess fat varies and their T2DM susceptibility cannot
local biochemical effects of lipid excess.
be known unless their PFT is exceeded. Once T2DM is triggered,
Comparative data from populations of different ethnicity re-
substantial weight loss will be needed to reverse it. This hypothet-
veal substantial ethnic differences in the susceptibility to de-
ical PFT for a person could be determined by careful observation
velop diabetes depending upon the burden of fat. A large popu-
during a weight loss intervention and would be the BMI at which
lation study has observed that the equivalent degree of risk for a
their first-phase insulin response became normal. Following pub-
Caucasian of BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 is expressed in South
lication of Lim’s study, individuals now report normal glucose
Asians at 25.2 kg/m2 and at 27 kg/m2 in African/Caribbeans [44].
control for up to 3 years to date [35,36]. It is notable that in
Within the ethnic groups, genetic polymorphisms, which are as-
the LookAhead, weight loss was 8.6 % by 1 year declining to
sociated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, can be identified
4.7 % by 4 years. Even this modest weight loss brought about
[45]. Liver fat content is strongly correlated with insulin sensit-
return of normoglycaemia sustained for at least 2 years in 9.2 %
ivity also in people of Asian ethnicity [46] and predicts future
of the group and, in keeping with the PFT hypothesis, the weight
onset of T2DM [47].
gain was associated with a fall in rate of sustained remission of
diabetes to 3.5 % [32].
In normal weight individuals presenting with possible T2DM,
TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS it is essential to exclude MODY and slow onset Type 1 diabetes,
even though most will have an ultimate diagnosis of classical
The PFT hypothesis could best be tested in those at highest risk for T2DM. Recognition that T2DM has similar pathophysiology, ir-
developing diabetes. The most homogenous group of individuals respective of BMI classification, is an important step in determin-
who would be closest to their PFT are those who have just reversed ing the most appropriate management for the individual patient.
their diabetes and are normoglycaemic with a normal first-phase The concept of a PFT is of practical benefit in explaining both
insulin response [30]. The defining characteristic for T2DM is the onset of diabetes and its logical management to all people
inadequate β-cell insulin secretion and the restoration or loss of presenting with T2DM.
408
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society
Normal weight individuals who develop Type 2 diabetes: the personal fat threshold
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society 409
R. Taylor and R. R. Holman
34 UKPDS (1990) UK Prospective Diabetes Study 7: response of 42 Kantartzis, K., Machann, J., Schick, F., Fritsche, A., Häring, H. U.
fasting plasma glucose to diet therapy in newly presenting type II and Stefan, N. (2010) The impact of liver fat vs visceral fat in
diabetic paitents, UKPDS group. Metabolism 39, 905–912 determining categories of prediabetes. Diabetologia 53,
CrossRef PubMed 882–889 CrossRef PubMed
35 Steven, S., Lim, E. and Taylor, R. (2013) Population response to 43 Fabbrini, E., Magkos, F., Mohammed, B. S., Pietka, T., Abumrad,
information on reversibility of type 2 diabetes. Diabet. Med. 30, N. A., Patterson, B. W., Okunade, A. and Klein, S. (2009)
e135–e138 CrossRef PubMed Intrahepatic fat, not visceral fat, is linked with metabolic
36 Doughty, R. (2013) Type 2 diabetes and the diet that cured me. complications of obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106,
The Guardian, 12 May 2013 http://www.theguardian.com/ 15430–15435 CrossRef PubMed
lifeandstyle/2013/may/12/type-2-diabetes-diet-cure 44 Tillin, T., Sattar, N., Godsland, I. F., Hughes, A. D., Chaturvedi, N.
37 Szczepaniak, L. S., Nurenberg, P., Leonard, D., Browning, J. D., and Forouhi, N. G. (2014) Ethnicity-specific obesity cut-points in
Reingold, J. S., Grundy, S., Hobbs, H. H. and Dobbins, R. L. the development of type 2 diabetes – a prospective study
(2005) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic including three ethnic groups in the United Kingdom. Diabet.
triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the Med. doi: 10.1111/dme.12576
general population. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 288, 45 Farrell, G. C., Wong, V. W. and Chitturi, S. (2013) NAFLD in
E462–E468 CrossRef PubMed Asia–as common and important as in the West. Nat. Rev.
38 Perry, R. J., Samuel, V. T., Petersen, K. F. and Shulman, G. I. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 307–318 CrossRef PubMed
(2014) The role of hepatic lipids in hepatic insulin resistance 46 Khoo, C. M., Leow, M. K., Sadananthan, S. A., Lim, R.,
and type 2 diabetes. Nature 510, 84–91 Venkataraman, K., Khoo, E. Y., Velan, S. S., Ong, Y. T., Kambadur,
CrossRef PubMed R., McFarlane, C. et al. (2014) Body fat partitioning does not
39 Kantartzis, K., Peter, A., Machicao, F., Machann, J., Wagner, S., explain the interethnic variation in insulin sensitivity among
Königsrainer, I., Königsrainer, A., Schick, F., Fritsche, A., Häring, Asian ethnicity: the Singapore adults metabolism study. Diabetes
H. U. and Stefan, N. (2009) Dissociation between fatty liver and 63, 1093–1102 CrossRef PubMed
insulin resistance in humans carrying a variant of the patatin-like 47 Shibata, M., Kihara, Y., Taguchi, M., Tashiro, M. and Otsuki, M.
phospholipase 3 gene. Diabetes 58, 2616–2623 (2007) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a risk factor for type 2
CrossRef PubMed diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. Diabetes Care 30,
40 Szczepaniak, L. S., Victor, R. G., Mathur, R., Nelson, M. D., 2940–2944 CrossRef PubMed
Szczepaniak, E. W., Tyer, N., Chen, I., Unger, R. H., Bergman, R. 48 McGarry, J. D. (2002) Banting lecture 2001: dysregulation of
N. and Lingvay, I. (2012) Pancreatic steatosis and its fatty acid metabolism in the etiology of type 2 diabetes.
relationship to β-cell dysfunction in humans: racial and ethnic Diabetes 51, 7–18 CrossRef PubMed
variations. Diabetes Care 35, 2377–2383 49 Unger, R. H. (1995) Lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of
CrossRef PubMed obesity-dependent NIDDM. Genetic and clinical implications.
41 Lee, Y., Hirose, H., Ohneda, M., Johnson, J. H., McGarry, J. D. Diabetes 44, 863–870 CrossRef PubMed
and Unger, R. H. (1994) Beta-cell lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis 50 Storgaard, H., Jensen, C. B., Vaag, A. A., Vølund, A. and
of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of obese rats: Madsbad, S. (2003) Insulin secretion after short- and long-term
impairment in adipocyte-beta-cell relationships. Proc. low-grade free fatty acid infusion in men with increased risk of
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10878–10882 developing type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 52, 885–894
CrossRef PubMed CrossRef PubMed
410
C The Authors Journal compilation
C 2015 Biochemical Society