IEEE

IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

Annex B
(informative)

Sample calculations
This annex illustrates the application of equations, tables, and graphs for designing a substation grounding
system. The specific objectives are as follows:

a) To show the application of principal equations of this guide for several refinements of the design
concept toward a satisfactory final design solution.
b) To illustrate the typical differences to be expected between results obtained using the simplified
calculations of this guide and the more rigorous computer solutions.
c) To illustrate such design conditions for which the use of simplified calculations of this guide would
not be appropriate for a safe design, as some of the equations may only be used with caution.

In view of these objectives, the following series of examples (B.1–B.4) neither represents, nor is intended to
be, the best or most efficient way to design a grounding system.

A computer-based grounding program described in EPRI TR-100622 [B63] was used to model the grids in
these examples.

For the series of examples (B.1–B.4), the design data are as follows:

Fault duration tf = 0.5 s

Positive sequence equivalent system impedance Z1 = 4.0 + j10.0 Ω (115 kV side)
Zero sequence equivalent system impedance Z0 = 10.0 + j40.0 Ω (115 kV side)
Current division factor Sf = 0.6
Line-to-line voltage at worst-fault location = 115,000 V
Soil resistivity ρ = 400 Ω·m
Crushed rock resistivity (wet) ρs = 2500 Ω·m
Thickness of crushed rock surfacing hs = 0.102 m (4 in)
Depth of grid burial h = 0.5 m
Available grounding area A = 63 m × 84 m
Transformer impedance, (Z1 and Z0) = 0.034 + j1.014 Ω (13 kV)
(Z = 9% at 15 MVA, 115/13 kV)

The crushed-rock resistivity is assumed to be a conservative estimate based on actual measurements of

typical rock samples. The equivalent system fault impedances and current division factor Sf are determined
for the worst-fault type and location, including any conceivable system additions over the next 25 years.
Thus, no additional safety factor for system growth is added. In addition, it is assumed that the substation
will not be cleared by circuit breakers with an automatic reclosing scheme. Thus, the fault duration and
shock duration are equal.

B.1 Square grid without ground rods—Example 1

Using the step-by-step procedure as described in 16.4 and illustrated in Figure 33, the following design eval-
uations can be made.

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 129

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

Step 1: Field data. Although the substation grounding grid is to be located within a rectangle of 63 m × 84
m (5292 m2), for the initial design assessment it may be expedient to assume a square 70 m × 70 m grid with
no ground rods. Consequently, the area occupied by such a grid is A = 4900 m2. An average soil resistivity of
400 Ω·m is assumed, based on soil resistivity measurements.

Step 2: Conductor size. Ignoring the station resistance, the symmetrical ground fault current If ≈ 3I0, is
computed using Equation (67)

E
I 0 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (B.1)
3 ⋅ R f + ( R1 + R2 + R0 ) + j ( X 1 + X 2 + X 0 )

For the 115 kV bus fault

( 3 ) ( 115, 000 ⁄ 3 )
3I 0 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 ( 0 ) + ( 4.0 + 4.0 + 10.0 ) + j ( 10.0 + 10.0 + 40.0 )

and, hence

|3I0| = 3180 A, and the X/R ratio = 3.33

For the 13 kV bus fault, the 115 kV equivalent fault impedances must be transferred to the 13 kV side of the
transformer. It should be noted that, due to the delta-wye connection of the transformer, only the positive
sequence 115 kV fault impedance is transferred. Thus

13 2
Z 1 =  --------- ( 4.0 + j10.0 ) + 0.034 + j1.014 = 0.085 + j1.142
 115

Z 0 = 0.034 + j1.014

( 3 ) ( 13, 000 ⁄ 3 )
3I 0 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 ( 0 ) + ( 0.085 + 0.085 + 0.034 ) + j ( 1.142 + 1.142 + 1.014 )

and, hence

3I 0 = 6814 A, and the X/R ratio is 16.2

The 13 kV bus fault value of 6814 A should be used to size the grounding conductor.

Using Table 10 for a fault duration of 0.5 s, the decrement factor Df is approximately 1.0; thus, the rms
asymmetrical fault current is also 6814 A. This current magnitude will be used to determine the minimum
diameter of ground conductors.

Assuming the use of copper wire and an ambient temperature of 40 °C, Equation (42) and Table 2 are used
to obtain the required conductor cross-sectional area. For 0.5 s and a melting temperature of 1084 °C for
hard-drawn copper, the required cross-sectional area in circular mils is

A kcmil = I ⋅ K f t c (B.2)

A kcmil = 6.814 ⋅ 7.06 0.5 = 34.02kcmil

130 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

34.02 kcmil = 17.2 mm2

Because Amm2 = πd2/4, the conductor diameter is approximately 4.7 mm, or 0.0047 m if it is solid conductor.

Based on this computation, a copper wire as small as size #4 AWG could be used, but due to the mechanical
strength and ruggedness requirements, a larger 2/0 AWG stranded conductor with diameter d = 0.0105 m
(0.414 in) is usually preferred as a minimum.

Consequently, at this stage, the designer may opt to check if, alternately, the use of a less conductive (30%)
copper-clad steel wire and the imposition of a more conservative maximum temperature limit of 700 °C will
still permit the use of a conductor with diameter d = 0.01 m.

Using Equation (41) and Table 1 gives

197.4
A kcmil = I -------------------------------------------------------- (B.3)
 TCAP K o + T m
--------------- ln  ------------------- -
 t c α r ρ r  K o + T a 

197.4 2
A kcmil = 6.184 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ = 65.9kcmils or 33.4 mm
3.85 245 + 700
-------------------------------------------------------- ln  ------------------------
( 0.5 ) ( 0.00378 ) ( 5.862 )  245 + 40 

In this case, dmin = 6.5 mm, or 0.0065 m solid conductor, which is less than d = 0.01 m desired. Hence, a
30% copper-clad steel wire of approximately 2/0 AWG size is a viable alternative for grid wires, even if a
conservative maximum temperature limit of 700 °C is imposed.

Step 3: Touch and step criteria. For a 0.102 m (4 in) layer of crushed rock surfacing, with resistivity of
2500 Ω·m, and for an earth with resistivity of 400 Ω·m, the reflection factor K is computed using
Equation (21)

ρ–ρ
K = --------------s (B.4)
ρ + ρs

400 – 2500
K = --------------------------- = – 0.72
400 + 2500

Figure 11 indicates for K = –0.72 the resistivity of crushed rock is to be derated by a reduction factor Cs ≈
0.74. The reduction factor Cs can also be approximated using Equation (27)

ρ
0.09  1 – -----
 ρ s
C s = 1 – ------------------------------ (B.5)
2h s + 0.09

400
0.09  1 – ------------
 2500
C s = 1 – --------------------------------------
2 ( 0.102 ) + 0.09

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 131

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

Assuming that for the particular station the location of grounded facilities within the fenced property17 is
such that the person’s weight can be expected to be at least 70 kg, Equation (30) and Equation (33) may be
used to compute the tolerable step and touch voltages, respectively, as follows:

E step70 = ( 1000 + 6C s ρ s )0.157 ⁄ t s (B.6)

E step70 = [ ( 1000 + 6 ( 0.74 )2500 ) ]0.157 ⁄ 0.5 = 2686.6 V

E step70 = ( 1000 + 1.5C s ρ s )0.157 ⁄ t s (B.7)

E step70 = [ ( 1000 + 1.5 ( 0.74 )2500 ) ]0.157 ⁄ 0.5 = 838.2 V

Step 4: Initial design. Assume a preliminary layout of 70 m × 70 m grid with equally spaced conductors, as
shown in Figure B.1, with spacing D = 7 m, grid burial depth h = 0.5 m, and no ground rods. The total length
of buried conductor, LT, is 2 × 11 × 70 m = 1540 m.

Figure B.1—Square grid without ground rods

Step 5: Determination of grid resistance. Using Equation (52) for L = 1540 m, and grid area A = 4900 m2,
the resistance is

1 1 1
R g = ρ ------ + --------------  1 + ------------------------------ (B.8)
LT 20 A  1 + h 20 ⁄ A

17
That is, not accessible to the general public.

132 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

1 1 1
R g = 400 ------------ + --------------------------  1 + ------------------------------------------- = 2.78 Ω
1540 20 ⋅ 4900  1 + 0.5 20 ⁄ 4900

Step 6: Maximum grid current IG. Per the procedure and definitions of 15.1, the maximum grid current IG
is determined by combining Equation (63) and Equation (64). Referring to Step 2, for Df = 1.0, and the given
current division factor Sf = 0.6,

Ig
S f = -----------
- (B.9)
3 ⋅ I0

and

IG = D f ⋅ Ig (B.10)

Though the 13 kV bus fault value of 6814 A is greater than the 115 kV bus fault value of 3180 A, it is
recalled from Clause 15 that the wye-grounded 13 kV transformer winding is a “local” source of fault cur-
rent and does not contribute to the GPR. Thus, the maximum grid current is based on 3180 A.

IG = D f ⋅ S f ⋅ 3 ⋅ I0 (B.11)

I G = ( 1 ) ( 0.6 ) ( 3180 ) = 1908 A

Step 7: GPR. Now it is necessary to compare the product of IG and Rg, or GPR, to the tolerable touch
voltage, Etouch70

GPR = I G ⋅ R g (B.12)

GPR = 1908 ⋅ 2.78 = 5304 V

which far exceeds 838 V, determined in Step 3 as the safe value of Etouch70. Therefore, further design
evaluations are necessary.

Step 8: Mesh voltage. Using Equation (81) through Equation (83), Km is computed

2 2 K ii
1 D (D + 2 + h) h 8
K m = ---------- ⋅ ln --------------------- + ------------------------------ – ---------- + ------- ⋅ ln ---------------------------- (B.13)
2⋅π 16 ⋅ h ⋅ d 8⋅D⋅h 4⋅d K h π ( 2 ⋅ n – 1)

where

1
K ii = -----------------2 (B.14)
---
n
(2 ⋅ n)

1
K ii = --------------------------
2 ⁄ 11
- = 0.57
( 2 ⋅ 11 )

and

h
Kh = 1 + ----- (B.15)
h0

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 133

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

0.5
Kh = 1 + ------- = 1.225
1.0

2 2
1 7 ( 7 + 2 ⋅ 0.5 ) 0.5 0.57 8
K m = ------ ⋅ ln --------------------------------- + ------------------------------- – ------------------ + ------------- ln -------------------------------
2π 16 ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ 0.01 8 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 0.01 4 ⋅ 0.01 1.225 π ( 2 ⋅ 11 – 1 )

The factor Ki is computed using Equation (84) through Equation (89)

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ⋅ n (B.16)

where

n = na ⋅ nb ⋅ nc ⋅ nd (B.17)

2⋅L
n a = -------------C- (B.18)
LP

2 ⋅ 1540
n a = -------------------
280

nb = 1 for square grid

nc = 1 for square grid
nd = 1 for square grid

and

n = 11 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 1 = 11

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ⋅ 11 = 2.272

Finally, Em is computed using Equation (80) and Equation (90)

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Km ⋅ Ki
E m = ----------------------------------
- (B.19)
LC + LR

400 ⋅ 1908 ⋅ 0.89 ⋅ 2.272

E m = ---------------------------------------------------------- = 1002.1 V
1540

Step 9: Em vs. Etouch. The mesh voltage is higher than the tolerable touch voltage (that is, 1002.1 V versus
838.2 V). The grid design must be modified.

For comparison, the EPRI TR-100622 [B63] computer program resulted in 2.67 Ω and 984.3 V for the grid
resistance and touch voltage, respectively, for this example.

134 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

B.2 Square grid with ground rods—Example 2

In the previous example, B.1, Step 10 of the design procedure has not been reached due to the failure to meet
the criterion of Step 9. Generally, there are two approaches to modifying the grid design to meet the tolerable
touch voltage requirements

a) Reduce the GPR to a value below the tolerable touch voltage or to a value low enough to result in a
value of Em below the tolerable touch voltage.
b) Reduce the available ground fault current.

Usually reduction of the available ground fault current is difficult or impractical to achieve, so the grid is
modified by changing any or all of the following: grid conductor spacing, total conductor length, grid depth,
addition of ground rods, etc. In this example, the preliminary design will be modified to include 20 ground
rods, each 7.5 m (24.6 ft) long, around the perimeter of the grid, as shown in Figure B.2.

Figure B.2—Square grid with 20 7.5 m rods

Step 5. Using Equation (52) for LT = 1540 + 20 · 7.5 = 1690 m, and A = 4900 m2 yields the following value
of grid resistance Rg:

1 1 1
R g = ρ ------ + --------------  1 + ------------------------------ (B.20)
LT 20 A  1 + h 20 ⁄ A

 
1 1  1 
R g = 400 ------------ + --------------------------  1 + --------------------------------- = 2.75 Ω
1690 20 ⋅ 4900  20 
 1 + 0.5 ------------
4900

Steps 6 and 7. The revised GPR is (1908)(2.75) = 5247 V, which is still much greater than 838.2 V.

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 135

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

Step 8. Using Equation (81) and Equation (83), Km is computed

2 K ii
1 D (D + 2 ⋅ h) h 8
K m = ---------- ⋅ ln --------------------- + -------------------------- – ---------- + ------- ⋅ ln ---------------------------- (B.21)
2⋅π 16 ⋅ h ⋅ d 8⋅D⋅d 4⋅d K h π ( 2 ⋅ n – 1)

where

Kii = 1.0 with rods

and

h
Kh = 1 + ----- (B.22)
h0

0.5
Kh = 1 + ------- = 1.225
1.0

2 2
1 7 ( 7 + 2 ⋅ 0.5 ) 0.5 1.0 8
K m = ------ ln --------------------------------- + ------------------------------- – ------------------ + ------------- ln ------------------------------- = 0.77
2π 16 ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ 0.01 8 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 0.01 4 ⋅ 0.01 1.225 π ( 2 ⋅ 11 – 1 )

This time, Em is computed using Equation (80) and Equation (91)

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Km ⋅ Ki
E m = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Lr 
L C + 1.55 + 1.22 ⋅  ---------------------- ⋅ L R
 L 2 + L 2
x y
(B.23)

400 ⋅ 1908 ⋅ 0.77 ⋅ 2.272

E m = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 747.4 V
 7.5 
1540 + 1.55 + 1.22  --------------------------- 150
 70 + 70  2 2

Because the step voltage has not been calculated yet, Equation (89) and Equation (92) through Equation (94)
are used to compute Ki, Es, LS, and Ks, respectively. Note that the value for Ki is still 2.272 (same as for mesh
voltage).

1 1 1 1 n–2
K s = --- ---------- + ------------- + ---- ( 1 – 0.5 ) (B.24)
π 2⋅h D+h D

1 1 1 1 11 – 2
K s = --- --------------- + ---------------- + --- ( 1 – 0.5 ) = 0.406
π 2 ⋅ 0.5 7 + 0.5 7

Then

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Ks ⋅ Ki
E s = ------------------------------------------------
- (B.25)
0.75 ⋅ L C + 0.85 ⋅ L R

400 ⋅ 1908 ⋅ 0.406 ⋅ 2.272

E s = ------------------------------------------------------------- = 548.9 V
0.75 ⋅ 1540 + 0.85 ⋅ 150

136 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

Step 9: Em vs. Etouch. Now the calculated corner mesh voltage is lower than the tolerable touch voltage
(747.4 V versus 838.2 V), and we are ready to proceed to Step 10.

Step 10: Es vs. Estep. The computed Es is well below the tolerable step voltage determined in Step 3 of
Example 1. That is, 548.9 V is much less than 2686.6 V.

Step 11: Modify design. Not necessary for this example.

Step 12: Detailed design. A safe design has been obtained. At this point, all equipment pigtails, additional
ground rods for surge arresters, etc., should be added to complete the grid design details.

For comparison, the computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63] resulted in 2.52 Ω, 756.2 V and 459.1 V
for the grid resistance, touch voltage and step voltage, respectively, for this example.

B.3 Rectangular grid with ground rods—Example 3

In this example the preliminary grid design will be reconciled in terms of the actual shape of the grounding
area as an alternative design. Realizing that the full grounding area is only about 8% larger than that used in
the previous calculations, most of the conclusions from Example 2 can be used for arriving at a suitable final
design solution.

Choosing, again, spacing D = 7 m, for a rectangular 63 m × 84 m grid, the grid wire pattern is 10 × 13, and
the grid conductor combined length is 13 × 63 m + 10 × 84 m = 1659 m. Assume the use of 38 ground rods,
each 10 m long, as shown in Figure B.3.

Figure B.3—Rectangular grid with thirty-eight 10 m ground rods

Step 5. Again, using Equation (52), but for LT = 1659 m + (38)(10 m) = 2039 m and A = 63 m × 84 m = 5292
m2, gives

1 1 1
R g = ρ ------ + --------------  1 + ------------------------------ (B.26)
LT 20 A  1 + h 20 ⁄ A

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 137

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

1 1 1
R g = 400 ------------ + --------------------------  1 + ------------------------------------------- = 2.62 Ω
2039 20 ⋅ 5292  1 + 0.5 20 ⁄ 5292

Steps 6 and 7. Using IG = 1908 A as before, and Rg = 2.62 Ω, the GPR = (1908)(2.62) = 4998.96 V, which is
much greater than 838.2 V.

Step 8. For the particular design arrangement shown in Figure B.3, the equations of 16.5.1 can again be used
to estimate the corner mesh voltage. However, because the grid is rectangular, the value of n to be used in the
mesh voltage computation will be different, based on the factors determined using Equation (84) through
Equation (88).

n = na ⋅ nb ⋅ nc ⋅ nd (B.27)

2⋅L
n a = -------------C- (B.28)
Lp

2 ⋅ 1659
n a = ------------------- = 11.29
294

Lp
nb = --------------
- (B.29)
4⋅ A

294
nb = ----------------------- = 1.005
4 ⋅ 5292

nc = 1 for rectangular grid

nd = 1 for rectangular grid

n = 11.29 ⋅ 1.005 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 1 = 11.35

Now Km is computed using Equation (81) and Equation (83)

2 K ii
1 D (D + 2 ⋅ h) h 8
K m = ---------- ⋅ ln --------------------- + -------------------------- – ---------- + ------- ⋅ ln ---------------------------- (B.30)
2⋅π 16 ⋅ h ⋅ d 8⋅D⋅d 4⋅d Kh π(2 ⋅ n – 1)

where

K ii = 1 for a grid with ground rods

0.5
Kh = 1 + ------- = 1.225
1.0

2 2
1 7 ( 7 + 2 ⋅ 0.5 ) 0.5 1.0 8
K m = ------ ln --------------------------------- + ------------------------------- – ------------------ + ------------- ln -------------------------------------- = 0.77
2π 16 ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ 0.01 8 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 0.01 4 ⋅ 0.01 1.225 π ( 2 ⋅ 11.35 – 1 )

Equation (89) is used to compute Ki

138 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ⋅ n (B.31)

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ⋅ 11.35 = 2.324

Finally, Em is computed using Equation (80) and Equation (91)

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Km ⋅ Ki
E m = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (B.32)
 Lr 
L C + 1.55 + 1.22 ⋅  ---------------------- ⋅ L R
 L 2 + L 2
x y

400 ⋅ 1908 ⋅ 0.77 ⋅ 2.324

E m = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 595.8 V
 10 
1659 + 1.55 + 1.22  --------------------------- 380
 63 + 84  2 2

Step 9. This calculated mesh voltage is well below the Etouch70 limit of 838.2, but uses 119 m of additional
conductor and 230 m of additional ground rods, as compared with the previous example. Thus, the mesh
spacing could be reduced, the number and/or length of ground rods could be reduced, or both to achieve the
same margin of safety as example 2.

The remaining steps are the same as demonstrated in example 2 and will not be repeated here.

For comparison, the computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63] resulted in 2.28 Ω, 519.4 V and 349.7 V
for the grid resistance, touch voltage, and step voltage, respectively, for this example.

B.4 L-shaped grid with ground rods—Example 4

In this example the design of Example 2 is modified to illustrate the use of the equations for an L-shaped
grid with ground rods. The total area and mesh spacing are the same as that of Example 2, and the ground
rods are located only around the perimeter of the grid, as shown in Figure B.4. All other parameters are the
same as Example 2, except the number of rods (24). Thus, Steps 1–4 are the same as example 2, and this
example begins with Step 5.

Step 5. Using Equation (52) for LT = 1575 m + (24)(7.5 m) = 1755 m and A = 4900 m2, gives

1 1 1
R g = ρ ------ + --------------  1 + ------------------------------ (B.33)
LT 20 A  1 + h 20 ⁄ A

1 1 1
R g = 400 ------------ + --------------------------  1 + ------------------------------------------- = 2.74 Ω
1755 20 ⋅ 4900  1 + 0.5 20 ⁄ 4900

Steps 6 and 7. The revised GPR is (1908)(2.74) = 5228 V, which is much greater than the tolerable touch
voltage of 838.2 V.

Step 8. Using Equation (84) through Equation (88), and Equation (81) and Equation (89), n, Km, and Ki are
computed

n = na = nb ⋅ nc ⋅ nd (B.34)

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 139

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

Figure B.4—L-shaped grid with 24 7.5 ground rods

2⋅L
n a = -------------C- (B.35)
Lp

2 ⋅ 1575
n a = ------------------- = 9
350

Lp
nb = --------------
- (B.36)
4⋅ A

350
nb = ----------------------- = 1.12
4 ⋅ 4900

0.7 ⋅ A
---------------
Lx ⋅ Ly Lx ⋅ Ly
n c = --------------- (B.37)
A

0.7 ( 4900 )
------------------------
70 ⋅ 105 70 ( 105 )
n c = ------------------- = 1.21
4900

140 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

nd = 1 for L-shaped grid

n = (9)(1.12)(1.21)(1) = 12.2

Now Km is computed using Equation (81) and Equation (83)

Kii = 1

0.5
Kh = 1 + ------- = 1.225
1.0

2 2 K ii
1 D (D + 2 ⋅ h) h 8
K m = ---------- ln --------------------- + ---------------------------- – ---------- + ------- ⋅ ln ---------------------------- (B.38)
2⋅π 16 ⋅ h ⋅ d 8⋅D⋅d 4⋅d Kh π(2 ⋅ n – 1)

2 2
1 7 ( 7 + 2 ( 0.5 ) ) 0.5 1.0 8
K m = ------ ln ----------------------------- + -------------------------------- – ------------------ + ------------- ⋅ ln ------------------------------------ = 0.76
2π 16 ( 0.5 )0.01 8 ( 7 )0.01 4 ( 0.01 ) 1.225 π ( 2 ( 12.2 ) – 1 )

Equation (89) is used to compute Ki

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ⋅ n (B.39)

K i = 0.644 + 0.148 ( 12.2 ) = 2.45

Finally, Em is computed using Equation (81) and Equation (91)

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Km ⋅ Ki
E m = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (B.40)
 Lr 
L C + 1.55 + 1.22 ⋅ i  ---------------------- ⋅ L R
 L 2 + L 2
x y

( 400 ) ( 1908 ) ( 0.76 ) ( 2.45 )

E m = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = 761.1 V
 7.5 
1575 + 1.55 + 1.22  ------------------------------ 180
 70 + 105  2 2

Equation (92) through Equation (94) are used to compute Es, Ls and Ks, respectively. It should be noted that
the value for Ki is still 2.45 (same as for mesh voltage).

1 1 1 1 n–2
K s = --- ---------- + ------------- + ---- ( 1 – 0.5 ) (B.41)
π 2⋅h D+h D

1 1 1 1 12.2 – 2
K s = --- --------------- + ---------------- + --- ( 1 – 0.5 ) = 0.41
π 2 ( 0.5 ) 7 + 0.5 7

Then

ρ ⋅ IG ⋅ Ks ⋅ Ki
E s = ------------------------------------------------
- (B.42)
0.75 ⋅ L C + 0.85 ⋅ L R

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 141

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

( 400 ) ( 1908 ) ( 0.41 ) ( 2.45 )

E s = -------------------------------------------------------------- = 574.6 V
0.75 ( 1575 ) + 0.85 ( 180 )

Step 9. Note that this is close to the results of Example 2, and is lower than the tolerable Etouch70 limit of
838.2 V. Proceed to Step 10.

Step 10. The computed Es is well below the tolerable step voltage determined in Step 3 of example 1. That
is, 574.6 V is much less than 2686.6 V.

Step 11. Not required for this example.

Step 12. A safe design has been obtained and final details can now be added to the design.

For comparison, a computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63] gives results of 2.34 Ω, 742.9 V and
441.8 V for the grid resistance, touch voltage, and step voltage, respectively, for this example.

B.5 Equally spaced grid with ground rods in two-layer soil—exhibit 1

Using the computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63], an equally spaced grid in two-layer soil was
modeled.

As shown in Figure B.5, the 61 m × 61 m (200 ft × 200 ft) grid consisted of four meshes per side, and had
nine ground rods, each 9.2 m (30 ft) long. The diameter of ground rods was 0.0127 m (0.5 in). The grid
consisted of four meshes per side, formed by wires of a 0.01 m diameter, buried 0.5 m below the earth’s
surface. The depth of the upper layer 300 Ω·m soil was 4.6 m (15 ft); the lower soil had resistivity of
100 Ω·m.

The computer-calculated values of resistance, corner mesh voltage, and maximum step voltage, are as
follows:

Rg = 1.353 Ω Em = 49.66% of GPR Es = 18.33% of GPR

As can be determined from Figure B.6, the mesh voltage coordinates were X = –75.00 ft, and Y= –75.00 ft,
that is, near the center of the corner mesh. The maximum step voltage (not shown) was calculated outside the
grid, between the grid corner (X, Y = –100 ft) and the point at X, Y = –102.12 ft, that is, approximately over
1 m distance in a diagonal direction away from the grid corner.

B.6 Unequally spaced grid with ground rods in uniform soil—exhibit 2

Using the computer program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63], a square grid with unequally spaced conductors
was modeled as shown in Figure B.7.

The computer output included the grid resistance, a surface voltage profile, the step voltage, and the corner
mesh voltage.

As shown in Figure B.8, the corner mesh voltage is only 9.29% of the GPR, while the maximum touch volt-
age, occurring above the largest interior mesh, is 17.08% of the GPR.

The maximum touch voltage, thus, did not occur in the corner mesh. For other choices of conductor
spacings, the maximum touch voltage may occur above some other meshes. Therefore, for unequal spacings,
the touch voltages must be investigated over the entire grid, and the simplified criterion for checking the cor-

142 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
IN AC SUBSTATION GROUNDING Std 80-2000

ner mesh voltage alone is not sufficient. On the other hand, the resistance Rg is not too dependent on the
exact configuration of grid conductors and ground rods. For instance, were Rg estimated by equation (54) for
a combined length of grid conductors and ground rods LT = 18 × 91.44 m + 25 × 9.2 m = 1876 m, the calcu-
lated value of 1.61 Ω would be less than 14% higher than the value of 1.416 Ω calculated by the computer
program of EPRI TR-100622 [B63].

Figure B.6

Figure B.5—Equally spaced square grid with nine rods in two-layer soil

Figure B.6—Diagonal voltage profile for the grid of Figure B.5 in two-layer soil

Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved. 143

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
 IEEE
Std 80-2000 IEEE GUIDE FOR SAFETY

Figure B.8

9.2 m

Figure B.7—Unequally spaced square grid with twenty-five 9.2 m rods

Figure B.8—Diagonal voltage profile for an unequally spaced grid of Figure B.7

144 Copyright © 2000 IEEE. All rights reserved.

Authorized licensed use limited to: UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. Downloaded on May 28,2013 at 18:14:47 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.