0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation Rubric for Research

The document is a peer evaluation form for a group practical research project. It contains rubrics to evaluate each group member's contribution in areas such as knowledge, working with others, sources provided, and attendance. For each category, members could receive scores from 1-10. Most members received full scores of 10 from the evaluator except for one member who received lower scores of 1, 0, and 5 in some categories. The evaluator provided comments noting improvements for this member in subsequent discussions and the final research paper.

Uploaded by

Bea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
120 views5 pages

Peer Evaluation Rubric for Research

The document is a peer evaluation form for a group practical research project. It contains rubrics to evaluate each group member's contribution in areas such as knowledge, working with others, sources provided, and attendance. For each category, members could receive scores from 1-10. Most members received full scores of 10 from the evaluator except for one member who received lower scores of 1, 0, and 5 in some categories. The evaluator provided comments noting improvements for this member in subsequent discussions and the final research paper.

Uploaded by

Bea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL


S.Y. 2021-2022

SCORING RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
SECOND SEMESTER
NAME OF THE EVALUATOR: Vistan, Sophia B.
GROUP NUMBER AND SECTION: 6 – OLO Good Counsel

Evaluate the contribution of your groupmates in the accomplishment of every research section. Use the rubric below in evaluating your groupmates.
Criteria 10-Excellent 7-Very Good 4-Satisfactory 1-Needs Improvement
Member consistently and actively
Member contributes knowledge, Member contributes knowledge, Member did not contribute his
CONTRIBUTION OF contributes knowledge, opinions
opinions and skills with little opinions and skills with occasional knowledge and skills to the
KNOWLEDGE (CK) and skills without prompting or
prompting or reminding. prompting or reminding. research
reminding.
Member helps the group identify Member participates in working on Member did not participate in
WORKING WITH Member willingly participates in
the necessary changes and needed changes with occasional working on any needed changes
OTHERS (WWO) needed changes.
encourages group action for change prompting. on the paper.
Member has contributed at least 2
Member has contributed 2 sources Member has contributed 1 source Member has not contributed
CONTRIBUTION OF related literature and 1 related study
(RRL/RRS) that were included in (RRL/RRS) that were included in the sources (RRL/RRS) that were
SOURCES (CS) that were included in the final
the final output final output included in the final output
output
CONTRIBUTION Member contributes extensive Member contributes to the
Member contributes effort to the
TOWARDS RESEARCH effort to the completion of the completion of tasks but not all were Member has no contribution at all.
completion of the tasks.
(CT) tasks. included in the thesis.
ATTENDANCE IN Member was mostly present when Member was absent on several Member was absent on many
Member has always been present
RESEARCH MEETINGS working on the research. (1-2 occasions when working on the occasions when working on the
when working on the research.
(AT) absence/s) research. (2-3 absences) research. (more than 5 absences)

Page 1 of 5
BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2021-2022

SCORING RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
SECOND SEMESTER

Result
CONTRIBUTIO WORKING CONTRIBUTION ATTENDANCE Total Score
CONTRIBUTION
N OF WITH TOWARDS IN RESEARCH NAME OF MEMBERS (LAST, NAME)
OF SOURCES
KNOWLEDGE OTHERS RESEARCH (CT) MEETINGS ALPHABETICAL
(CS)
(CK) (WWO) (AT)
10 10 10 10 10 1. Punsalang, Ariana Francesca N. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 2. Salunga, Julianika Belen D. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 3. Sendin, Alessandra Nicole A. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 4. Sibug, Selweyn Neil M. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 5. Sicat, Jazzlene Danielle S 50/50
1 0 1 1 5 6. Valencia, Curl Apolo D 8/50
7. /50

Discussion
CONTRIBUTIO WORKING CONTRIBUTION ATTENDANCE Total Score
CONTRIBUTION
N OF WITH TOWARDS IN RESEARCH NAME OF MEMBERS (LAST, NAME)
OF SOURCES
KNOWLEDGE OTHERS RESEARCH (CT) MEETINGS ALPHABETICAL
(CS)
(CK) (WWO) (AT)
10 10 10 10 10 1. Punsalang, Ariana Francesca N. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 2. Salunga, Julianika Belen D. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 3. Sendin, Alessandra Nicole A. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 4. Sibug, Selweyn Neil M. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 5. Sicat, Jazzlene Danielle S 50/50
9 9 9 9 9 6. Valencia, Curl Apolo D 45/50

Page 2 of 5
BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2021-2022

SCORING RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
SECOND SEMESTER
7. /50

Research Paper
CONTRIBUTION WORKING CONTRIBUTION ATTENDANCE Total Score
CONTRIBUTION
OF WITH TOWARDS IN RESEARCH NAME OF MEMBERS (LAST, NAME)
OF SOURCES
KNOWLEDGE OTHERS RESEARCH (CT) MEETINGS ALPHABETICAL
(CS)
(CK) (WWO) (AT)
10 10 10 10 10 1. Punsalang, Ariana Francesca N. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 2. Salunga, Julianika Belen D. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 3. Sendin, Alessandra Nicole A. 50/50
9 10 7 8 10 4. Sibug, Selweyn Neil M. 44/50
10 10 10 10 10 5. Sicat, Jazzlene Danielle S 50/50
9 10 7 8 10 6. Valencia, Curl Apolo D 44/50
7. /50

Page 3 of 5
BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2021-2022

SCORING RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
SECOND SEMESTER
Research Presentation
CONTRIBUTION WORKING CONTRIBUTION ATTENDANCE Total Score
CONTRIBUTION
OF WITH TOWARDS IN RESEARCH NAME OF MEMBERS (LAST, NAME)
OF SOURCES
KNOWLEDGE OTHERS RESEARCH (CT) MEETINGS ALPHABETICAL
(CS)
(CK) (WWO) (AT)
10 10 10 10 10 1. Punsalang, Ariana Francesca N. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 2. Salunga, Julianika Belen D. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 3. Sendin, Alessandra Nicole A. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 4. Sibug, Selweyn Neil M. 50/50
10 10 10 10 10 5. Sicat, Jazzlene Danielle S 50/50
10 5 10 9 1 6. Valencia, Curl Apolo D 35/50
7. /50

Page 4 of 5
BASIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
S.Y. 2021-2022

SCORING RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION


PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
SECOND SEMESTER
SUMMARY
Research NAME OF MEMBERS (LAST, NAME) Total Score
Result Discussion Research Paper
Presentation ALPHABETICAL
50 50 50 50 1. Punsalang, Ariana Francesca N. 200/200
50 50 50 50 2. Salunga, Julianika Belen D. 200/200
50 50 50 50 3. Sendin, Alessandra Nicole A. 200/200
50 50 44 50 4. Sibug, Selweyn Neil M. 194/200
50 50 50 50 5. Sicat, Jazzlene Danielle S 200/200
8 45 44 35 6. Valencia, Curl Apolo D 132/200
7. /200

Evaluated by: _________________________________ Date: __May 6, 2022_______________


Signature over Printed Name

Page 5 of 5

You might also like