(https://www.britannica.
com/topic/architecture)
architecture, the art and technique of designing and building, as distinguished
from the skills associated with construction. The practice of architecture is
employed to fulfill both practical and expressive requirements, and thus it serves
both utilitarian and aesthetic ends. Although these two ends may be distinguished,
they cannot be separated, and the relative weight given to each can vary widely.
Because every society—settled or nomadic—has a spatial relationship to the
natural world and to other societies, the structures they produce reveal much about
their environment (including climate and weather), history, ceremonies, and artistic
sensibility, as well as many aspects of daily life.
The characteristics that distinguish a work of architecture from other built
structures are (1) the suitability of the work to use by human beings in general and
the adaptability of it to particular human activities, (2) the stability and permanence
of the work’s construction, and (3) the communication of experience and ideas
through its form. All these conditions must be met in architecture. The second is a
constant, while the first and third vary in relative importance according to the
social function of buildings. If the function is chiefly utilitarian, as in a factory,
communication is of less importance. If the function is chiefly expressive, as in a
monumental tomb, utility is a minor concern. In some buildings, such as churches
and city halls, utility and communication may be of equal importance.
Use
The types of architecture are established not by architects but by society, according
to the needs of its different institutions. Society sets the goals and assigns to the
architect the job of finding the means of achieving them. This section of the article
is concerned with architectural typology, with the role of society in determining the
kinds of architecture, and with planning—the role of the architect in adapting
designs to particular uses and to the general physical needs of human beings.
Architectural types
Architecture is created only to fulfill the specifications of an individual or group.
Economic law prevents architects from emulating their fellow artists in producing
works for which the demand is nonexistent or only potential. So the types of
architecture depend upon social formations and may be classified according to the
role of the patron in the community. The types that will be discussed here—
domestic, religious, governmental, recreational, welfare and educational, and
commercial and industrial—represent the simplest classification; a scientific
typology of architecture would require a more detailed analysis.
Domestic architecture
Domestic architecture is produced for the social unit: the individual, family, or clan
and their dependents, human and animal. It provides shelter and security for the
basic physical functions of life and at times also for commercial, industrial, or
agricultural activities that involve the family unit rather than the community. The
basic requirements of domestic architecture are simple: a place to sleep, prepare
food, eat, and perhaps work; a place that has some light and is protected from the
weather. A single room with sturdy walls and roof, a door, a window, and a hearth
are the necessities; all else can be considered luxury.
“Vernacular” architecture
In much of the world today, even where institutions have been in a continuous
process of change, dwelling types of ancient or prehistoric origin are in use. In the
industrialized United States, for instance, barns are being built according to a
design employed in Europe in the 1st millennium BCE. The forces that produce
a dynamic evolution of architectural style in communal building are usually
inactive in the home and farm. The lives of average people may be unaltered by the
most fundamental changes in their institutions. The people can be successively
enslaved persons, the subjects of a monarchy, and voting citizens without having
the means or the desire to change their customs, techniques, or surroundings.
Economic pressure is the major factor that causes average individuals to restrict
their demands to a level far below that which the technology of their time is
capable of maintaining. Frequently they build new structures with old techniques
because experiment and innovation are more costly than repetition. But in
wealthy cultures economy permits and customs encourage architecture to provide
conveniences such as sanitation, lighting, and heating, as well as separate areas for
distinct functions, and these may come to be regarded as necessities. The same
causes tend to replace the conservatism of the home with the aspirations of
institutional architecture and to emphasize the expressive as well as the utilitarian
function.
Expression
Expression in architecture is the communication of quality and meaning. The
functions and the techniques of building are interpreted and transformed by
expression into art, as sounds are made into music and words into literature.
The nature of expression varies with the character of culture in different places and
in different times, forming distinct modes or languages of expression that are
called styles. Style communicates the outlook of a culture and the concepts of its
architects. The boundaries of a style may be national and geographical
(e.g., Japanese, Mayan) or religious (e.g., Islamic)
and intellectual (e.g., Renaissance), embracing distinct linguistic, cultural, and
national units; different expressions within each of these boundaries are produced
by the particular style of regions, towns, groups, architects, or craftsmen. The life
span of styles may be long (ancient Egyptian, over 3,000 years) or short (Baroque,
less than 200 years) according to the changeability of cultural patterns. The
principal forces in the creation of a style are tradition, the experience of earlier
architecture; influence, the contribution of contemporary expressions outside the
immediate cultural environment; and innovation, the creative contribution of the
culture and the architect. These forces operate to produce an evolution within every
style and ultimately to generate new styles that tend to supplant their predecessors.
The components of expression, which communicate the particular values of style,
are content and form. Since content can be communicated only through form, the
two are organically united, but here they will be discussed separately in order to
distinguish the specific and concrete meaning (content) from the abstract
expression of qualities (form).
Theory of architecture
The term theory of architecture was originally simply the accepted translation of
the Latin term ratiocinatio as used by Vitruvius, a Roman architect-engineer of the
1st century CE, to differentiate intellectual from practical knowledge in
architectural education, but it has come to signify the total basis for judging the
merits of buildings or building projects. Such reasoned judgments are an essential
part of the architectural creative process. A building can be designed only by a
continuous creative, intellectual dialectic between imagination and reason in the
mind of each creator.
A variety of interpretations has been given to the term architectural theory by
those who have written or spoken on the topic in the past. Before 1750
every comprehensive treatise or published lecture course on architecture could
appropriately be described as a textbook on architectural theory. But, after the
changes associated with the Industrial Revolution, the amount of architectural
knowledge that could be acquired only by academic study increased to the point
where a complete synthesis became virtually impossible in a single volume.
The historical evolution of architectural theory is assessable mainly from
manuscripts and published treatises, from critical essays and commentaries, and
from the surviving buildings of every epoch. It is thus in no way a type of
historical study that can reflect accurately the spirit of each age and in this respect
is similar to the history of philosophy itself. Some architectural treatises were
intended to publicize novel concepts rather than to state widely accepted ideals.
The most idiosyncratic theories could (and often did) exert wide and
sometimes beneficial influence, but the value of these influences is not necessarily
related to the extent of this acceptance.
The analysis of surviving buildings provides guidance that requires great caution,
since, apart from the impossibility of determining whether or not any particular
group of buildings (intact or in ruins) constitutes a reliable sample of the era, any
such analyses will usually depend on preliminary evaluations of merit and will be
useless unless the extent to which the function, the structure, and the
detailing envisaged by the original builders can be correctly re-established.
Many erudite studies of antique theories are misleading because they rest on the
assumption that the original character and appearance of fragmentary ancient
Greek and Hellenistic architectural environments can be adequately deduced from
verbal or graphic “reconstructions.” Even when buildings constructed before 1500
remain intact, the many textbooks dealing with antique and medieval theories of
architecture seldom make qualitative distinctions and generally imply that all
surviving antique and medieval buildings were good, if not absolutely perfect.
Nevertheless, the study of the history of architectural philosophy, like that of the
history of general philosophy, not only teaches what past generations thought but
can help individuals decide how they themselves should act and judge. For those
desirous of establishing a viable theory of architecture for their own era, it is
generally agreed that great stimulus can be found in studying historical evidence
and in speculating on the ideals and achievements of those who created this
evidence.
2.
The primary object of an Architecture
TO DESIGN A SHELTER: Managing mass, space, volume, form, texture,
structure, light, shadow, and materials while dealing with human spatial and shelter
demands This can be done in a landscape or cityscape.
TO SEE COMPLETION OF HIS VISION: Achieving a goal that is useful,
affordable, practical, and creative while taking into account practical factors like
cost, building constraints, and technology.
The nature of work of an architect
Interdisciplinary Field: An architect's work is multidisciplinary, incorporating
elements of math, physics, art, technology, social sciences, politics, and history. It
is frequently influenced by philosophy. A strong need for originality, creativity,
conceptualization, perception, aesthetic ideals, and an all-encompassing evaluation
of individuals and environments.
Land surveys: Correspondingly, an architect is needed to produce land surveys,
assess properties for insurance, mortgage, and transfer purposes,
Technical advice: He may offer expert guidance on designing, enhancing, or
beautifying highways; entire towns; estates; or historical monuments.
Outdoor and Indoor work: An architect must work both inside and outside. He
needs to monitor the advancement of new techniques and materials and assess their
strengths and weaknesses.
Anthropometrics in architectural design
Anthropometrics is the comparative study of human physical measurements and
capabilities. It is derived from the Greek words anthropos (human) and metron
(machine) (meaning measure).
Anthropometry has a significant impact on building design and influences a wide
range of businesses, processes, services, and products.
Human dimensions and capacities are crucial in deciding the proportions and
general design of a building. The essential premise of anthropometrics is that
building designs should adapt to the human body rather than the other way around.
There are two basic areas of anthropometry:
The assessment of body sizes at rest and when utilizing objects such as seats,
tables, beds, mobility aids, and so on is known as static anthropometry.
The measuring of abilities associated to job accomplishment, such as
reaching, navigating, and motion, as well as other characteristics of space
and equipment utilization, is known as functional anthropometry.
Anthropometrics in architectural design strives to make every person as
comfortable as possible. In practice, this implies that the dimensions must be
appropriate, with adequate ceiling height, doorways and passageways, and so on. It
has recently gained prominence in workplace design, particularly in the interaction
between desk and chair, keyboard, and computer display.
The building standards include a variety of standard requirements and approved
solutions to assist designers in developing appropriate designs. However, it is
critical to consider the end user's individual purpose and expectations. Attempts to
use conventional dimensions may not reflect the underlying need for space.
Specific needs may exist for the elderly, children, those with mobility difficulties,
wheelchair users, and others. When designing stairs, lifts, ramps, and other
elements, effective accessibility and easy maneuverability around the building
must be prioritized. For further information, see Accessibility in the Built
Environment.
Anthropometry may also have an impact on the amount of space required for
furniture and fixtures. A bathroom, for example, must have enough space to
accommodate a bath and sink; a bedroom must have enough space to
accommodate an average-sized bed; and an office building must have enough
space to accommodate desks, air-conditioning units, public areas, meeting rooms,
and so on.
Anthropometric data is updated on a regular basis to reflect population changes.