0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views30 pages

Understanding Historical Sources

Here are concise responses to your questions in 3 sentences or less each: 1. Primary sources offer an insider's view of events and allow historians to directly access information from the time period being studied without interpretation from later authors. 2. While primary sources provide a more direct account, secondary sources play an important role in historical research by synthesizing and analyzing primary sources, providing context, and helping historians identify and evaluate relevant primary sources. 3. Secondary sources help historians efficiently learn about broad topics and identify areas for further primary source research by summarizing, analyzing, and contextualizing large amounts of primary source information. 4. However, secondary sources also introduce the risk of author bias or errors and remove the researcher one step
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views30 pages

Understanding Historical Sources

Here are concise responses to your questions in 3 sentences or less each: 1. Primary sources offer an insider's view of events and allow historians to directly access information from the time period being studied without interpretation from later authors. 2. While primary sources provide a more direct account, secondary sources play an important role in historical research by synthesizing and analyzing primary sources, providing context, and helping historians identify and evaluate relevant primary sources. 3. Secondary sources help historians efficiently learn about broad topics and identify areas for further primary source research by summarizing, analyzing, and contextualizing large amounts of primary source information. 4. However, secondary sources also introduce the risk of author bias or errors and remove the researcher one step
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HISTORICAL METHOD

HISTORICAL SOURCES
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
HISTORY

 Greek word “historia”


 Learning by inquiry
What are the limitations of
historical knowledge?
OUTLINE OF DISCUSSION
I.History as Reconstruction
II.The Historical Method
III.Historical Sources [Written and Non-
written; Primary and Secondary]
IV.Historical Criticism [External and Internal]
INTRODUCTION: HISTORY AS
RECONSTRUCTION

 The historian is many times removed from


the events under investigation
 Historians rely on surviving records
HISTORY AS RECONSTRUCTION
 “Only a part of what was observed in the past was
remembered by those who observed it; only a part
of what was remembered was recorded; only a part
of what was recorded has survived; only a part of
what has survived has come to the historian’s
attention.”
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History
HISTORY AS RECONSTRUCTION

 “Only a part of what is credible has been


grasped, and only a part of what has been
grasped can be expounded or narrated by
the historian.”
 Louis Gottschalk, Understanding History
WHAT IS THE HISTORICAL METHOD?

 Historians have to verify sources, to date


them, locate their place of origin and
identify their intended functions
WHAT IS THE HISTORICAL METHOD?

 The process of critically examining and


analyzing the records and survivals of the past
HISTORICAL SOURCES
 Sources
 an object from the past or testimony concerning the past on which
historians depend in order to create their own depiction of that past.
 Howell and Prevenier, From Reliable Sources an Introduction to
Historical Method
 Tangible remains of the past
 Anthony Brundage, Going to Sources
WRITTEN SOURCES
 Published materials
 Books, magazines, journals,
 Travelogue
 transcription of speech
 Manuscript [any handwritten or typed record that has not been
printed]
 Archival materials
 Memoirs, diary
NON-WRITTEN SOURCES

Oral
Artifact Ruins Fossils
history

Video Audio
Art works
recordings recordings
WHAT ARE PRIMARY SOURCES?

 Testimony of an eyewitness
 A primary source must have been produced
by a contemporary of the event it narrates
WHAT ARE PRIMARY SOURCES?
 A primary source is a document or physical
object which was written or created during
the time under study.
 These sources were present during an
experience or time period and offer an
inside view of a particular event.
WHAT ARE PRIMARY SOURCES?

 Primary sources are characterized by their


content, regardless of whether they are
available in original format, in
microfilm/microfiche, in digital format,
or in published format.
FOUR MAIN CATEGORIES OF PRIMARY SOURCES

1. Written 3.
2. Images
sources Artifacts

4. Oral
testimony
WHAT ARE SECONDARY SOURCES?
 A secondary source interprets and analyzes
primary sources. These sources are one or
more steps removed from the event.
 Secondary sources may have pictures, quotes or
graphics of primary sources in them.
WHAT ARE SECONDARY SOURCES?

 Examples:
 History textbook
 Printed materials (serials, periodicals which
interprets previous research)
ASSIGNMENT
 Topic: Tejeros Convention
 Primary Source: Santiago Alvarez’ account (only the
chapter 32)
 Secondary Source: Teodoro Agoncillo’s Revolt of the Masses
 Answer the last page of the photocopy
*Get the copy at the Paraguas
WHAT DO HISTORIANS DEAL WITH?

 Dynamic or genetic (the becoming)


 Static (the being)
WHAT IS THE AIM?

 Interpretative
 Descriptive
WRITTEN SOURCES

Narrative Diplomatic Social


or literary or juridical documents
NON-WRITTEN SOURCES

Material
Oral evidence
evidence
WHAT IS HISTORICAL CRITICISM?
 In order for a source to be used as evidence
in history, basic matters about its form and
content must be settled
 External Criticism
 Internal Criticism
INTERNAL CRITICISM

 Determines the historicity of facts contained in


the document.
 The value of facts, the character of the sources,
the knowledge of author, and the influences
prevalent at the time of writing must be carefully
investigated.
WHAT IS EXTERNAL CRITICISM?

 The problem of authenticity


 To spot fabricated, forged, faked
documents
 To distinguish a hoax or misrepresentation
TESTS OF AUTHENTICITY
 Determine the date of the document to see
whether they are anachronistic
 e.g. pencils did not exist before the 16th Century
 Determine the author
 e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
TESTS OF AUTHENTICITY
 Anachronistic style
 e.g. idiom, ortography, punctuation
 Anachronistic reference to events
 e.g. too early, too late, too remote
 Provenance or custody
 e.g. determines its genuineness
FORMAT

 Author’s Background
 Historical Context of the Document
 Analysis of the Important Historical Information Found in the
Document
 Contribution of the Document in Understanding the Grand
Narrative in Philippine History
 Relevance of the Document
1. What are the benefits of using primary sources?
2. Do you affirm that primary sources are superior to
secondary sources? Explain?
3. What are the advantages of accessing secondary sources?
4. What are the disadvantages of accessing secondary
sources?

You might also like