An Engineer's Guide To Temperature Sensing: Temperature Sensor Design Challenges and Solutions
An Engineer's Guide To Temperature Sensing: Temperature Sensor Design Challenges and Solutions
An Engineer’s Guide to
Temperature Sensing
Temperature sensor design challenges and solutions
TI.com/temperature
Table of contents
Whether you are designing personal electronics, industrial This e-book’s chapters describe significant temperature
or automotive systems, you must address some of the same challenges, focus on design considerations for applications,
challenges: how to increase performance, add features and and assess trade-offs between temperature accuracy and
shrink form factors. Along with these considerations, it’s application size while considering sensor placement. If you
imperative to carefully monitor temperature in order to ensure have feedback about the topics covered here or any other
safety and protect systems and consumers from harm. temperature monitoring and protection questions, please
Another trend across numerous industries is increased submit them to the Sensors forum on the TI E2E™ design
data processing from more sensors, further emphasizing support forums.
the importance of temperature measurement – not just
to measure system or environmental conditions but to
compensate for other temperature-sensitive components Authors
and maintain both sensor and system accuracy. As an
Sydney Davis, Bryan Padilla, Punya Prakash, Ben
added benefit, accurate temperature monitoring can increase
Kasemsadeh, Aaron Heng, Amit Ashara, Jose Arteaga,
system performance and reduce costs by removing the
Megan Anderson, Nicole Khoury, Brandon Fisher, Jalen Tate
need to overdesign systems to compensate for inaccurate
temperature measurements.
Iron
Copper
+
Th
Figure 2. Typical Thermistor Implementation Tc
Constantan Copper
-
Resistive Temperature Detectors (RTD)
RTDs are temperature sensors made of pure material, TMP
typically in platinum, nickel, or copper, with a highly
predictable resistance-temperature relationship.
V+ Cold Junction Compensation
Temperature Sensor
ISOURCE
Figure 4. Thermocouple With CJC Temperature
Sensor
RL
Thermocouples do not require external excitation, and
RL hence are not impacted by self-heating issues. They
can also support extreme temperatures (>2000°C).
+ While they are rugged and inexpensive,
VMEAS
thermocouples do require an additional temperature
PGA û ADC
sensor for cold-junction-compensation (CJC). They
± tend to be non-linear and are highly sensitive to
RL parasitic junctions where the thermocouple is attached
to the board.
RBIAS Finally, digitizing a thermocouple would be susceptible
RL
to previously discussed ADC errors.
Device Recommendations
Figure 3. Complex 4-Wire RTD Circuit For 40 years, Texas Instruments has manufactured
several IC-based temperature sensors, including:
Platinum RTDs can be highly accurate and very linear • Digital temperature sensors:
across a very wide temperature range up to 600°C. – Highest accuracy temperature sensors
Implementation with these analog sensors involve
complex circuitry and design challenges. Ultimately, – Lowest power with the smallest footprint
the accurate systems involve complex error analysis – LM75 / TMP75 temperature sensors
due to a higher number of contributing components – Multi-channel remote diode temperature
that also impact the overall system size. RTDs also sensors
require calibration during manufacturing followed by an
annual calibration process in the field. • High-accuracy analog temperature sensors
• Linear thermistors
Contributors to the RTD system error include RTD
Tolerance, self-heating, ADC (quantization error) and • Temperature switches or thermostats that offer
references used in the system. integrated hysteresis for enhanced noise immunity
Thermocouples Table 2. Related Documentation
Thermocouples are made of two dissimilar electrical COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION
conductors that form electrical junctions at different
temperatures. A thermocouple produces a Application Report - Layout Considerations for Accurately
Accuracy Measuring Ambient Temperature
temperature-dependent voltage as a result of the
thermoelectric seebeck effect. This voltage translates Application Report -
Methods to Calibrate Temperature
Temperature
to the difference of temperature between the hot Calibration
Monitoring Systems
junction (Th) and the cold junction (Tc).
6 Temperature sensing fundamentals SNOAA25 – January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Chapter 2: Ambient and board temperature monitoring
ABSTRACT
Power hungry electronic components such as CPUs, GPUs, or FPGAs, as well as voltage regulators heat
up during operation. Some applications require ambient air temperature measurements while others need
to measure the temperature of a nearby component on the PCB. Measuring ambient air temperature with
a surface mount technology (SMT) device is challenging due to the thermal influence of other components
within the system. In other systems, in which the temperature of a component needs to be measured,
ambient air temperature can influence and degrade the measurement accuracy.
The system designer needs to make certain design decisions regarding both package type and PCB
layout when integrating a temperature sensor. This application note provides recommendations to system
designers and explains methods for improving the accuracy of the temperature point being measured. The
Recommendations are provided both for air temperature measurements and for component temperature
measurement. The report details layout techniques, device orientation, and best practices for mounting.
Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 What Is Heat Conduction? ......................................................................................... 2
1.2 Determining The Dominant Thermal Conduction Path Of Selected Package Types ..................... 3
1.3 Determining Thermal Conduction Through The PCB .......................................................... 7
2 Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement ............................................................... 11
2.1 Ground Plane Considerations ................................................................................... 11
2.2 Partitioning the PCB .............................................................................................. 13
2.3 Isolation Island .................................................................................................... 14
2.4 Perforation.......................................................................................................... 15
2.5 Edge Connector ................................................................................................... 16
2.6 Controlling the Thermal Mass of the PCB ..................................................................... 17
3 Design Guidelines For Component Temperature Measurement ..................................................... 18
3.1 Location............................................................................................................. 18
4 Summary .................................................................................................................... 20
Trademarks
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 8
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
1 Introduction
Thermal conductivity (k) is the measure of a material's capability to conduct heat. It is used to describe
how heat conducts through a material. Metals are highly thermally conductive whereas materials like air,
wool, paper, or plastic are poor conductors of heat. Materials with a very low thermal conductivity, such as
polystyrene foam, act like a thermal insulator.
9 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Introduction
The materials that are most relevant to thermal analysis of PCBs are copper, FR4, and solder mask.
Copper is an excellent conductor of heat; it conducts heat significantly faster than FR4. Table 1 lists the
thermal conductivities found in PCBs. The higher the value, the more efficient the material is in
transferring heat, which results in a shorter thermal response time. For low k values, the temperature
gradient between the source and the sensor can be significantly large and must be considered carefully
during layout.
1.2 Determining The Dominant Thermal Conduction Path Of Selected Package Types
Surface mount temperature sensors offer several advantages over sensors with through-hole packages.
Advantages include a smaller package size with a low profile, convenient PCB placement, and ease of
assembly. However, SMT temperature sensors can be difficult to isolate because they have the tendency
to measure the PCB temperature rather than ambient air temperature. Therefore, special layout
techniques need to be employed if the objective of the temperature sensor is to measure the ambient
temperature rather than the PCB temperature. Local analog or digital temperature sensors determine
temperature by measuring their own die temperature. Therefore, it is important to understand the
dominant temperature conduction paths between the die of the temperature sensor and the object or
environment whose temperature is to be determined.
Heat is conducted primarily through the following paths:
1. The Die-attach pad (DAP), if present, provides the most dominant thermal path between the PCB and
the die
2. The leads provide the most significant thermal path if the package type does not include a DAP
3. The mold compound provides an additional thermal path, but due to its low thermal conductivity, any
heat transfer through the mold compound itself is slower than heat transfer through the leads or DAP.
The package type choice determines how quickly the temperature sensor can respond to changes in
temperature. Figure 2 shows the relative thermal response rates of different classes of selected SMT
package types that are used for temperature measurements.
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 10
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
Package types without a mold compound (CSP, DSBGA) and packages with a DAP (QFN, DFN) are well
suited if a fast thermal heat transfer from the PCB is desired, while package types without DAP are better
in applications in which slower response rates are desired. A fast thermal response rate allows the
temperature sensor to respond to any temperature changes quickly and therefore provide an accurate
reading.
Sections Section 1.2.2 to Section 1.2.1 show cross sections of commonly used SMT package types for
Texas Instruments' temperature sensors.
Figure 3. Heat Transfer WCSP (LMT70[YFQ], TMP103[YFF], TMP108[YFF]) Package Cross Section
Figure 6. Heat Transfer MSOP8, SOIC8 (LM75[D], TMP75[D]) Package Cross Section
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 12
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
13 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Introduction
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 14
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
Equation 7 is the perpendicular conduction heat flow equation to determine the thermal resistance of a
material, as specified in Table 1.
t t
T
k u ACS k u W u L
where
• t is the path of heat flow (the heat flows through the thickness of the material) [m]
• W x L = ACS is the cross sectional area where the heat is being applied [m2] (7)
15 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Introduction
k u Œ u ¨¨ 0 ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸¸ 385 u Œ u ¨¨ ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸
¨© 2 ¹ ¨©
© 2¹ mu C ¹ ¸¹
o
© ¹ ©
2 ¹ © 2
(9)
In order to obtain an accurate result, the thermal resistance of the air cylinder inside the via also needs to
be calculated and considered in parallel with the thermal resistance of the via sidewalls.
L L 1.6 u 10 3 o
&:
k u A CS
Cu
§§ D · 2 § D1 · ·
2
W §§ 0.43 u 10 3 · 2 §0· ·
2
k u Œ u ¨¨ 0 ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸ 385 u Œ u ¨¨ ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸¸
¨ © 2 ¹ ¹¸ m u oC ¨
©© 2 ¹ ©©
2 ¹ © 2¹ ¹
(10)
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 16
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
Equation 10 shows that the thermal resistance of the air cylinder is greater than 400,000℃/W. Because it
is approximately 5,000 times as large as the thermal resistance of the via sidewalls, the thermal
conduction contribution of the air has a negligible effect and can be ignored, as is proven by Equation 11.
TCu u Tair 81u 400646
Tvia TCu || Tair 81qC / W
TCu Tair 81 400646 (11)
The air filled drill hole of a via does not contribute much to the heat transfer rate, so almost all of the heat
transfer of a standard via occurs through its sidewalls. However, vias in which the hole is filled with a
different material may benefit from the heat transfer contribution of that material. Some designs require
vias to be filled in order to transfer heat even faster than a normal via. Filled vias should be considered if
even multiple parallel standard vias do not provide a sufficiently fast heat transfer rate to meet system
specifications.
The thermal resistance of 81℃/W for the non-filled via from this example can be compared to the thermal
resistance of a solid FR4 cylinder of equal outer diameter to determine how much more effective a copper
via is in transferring heat from one side of the PCB to the other. Equation 12 shows that the thermal
resistance of an equivalently sized cylinder of FR4 is 32,595℃/W, which is approximately 400 times more
resistive than the thermal resistance of the via.
L L 1.6 u 10 3 o
&:
k u A CS
FR4
§§ D · 2
§ D1 ·
2
· W §§ 0.5 u 10 3 · 2 § 0· ·
2
k u Œ u ¨¨ 0 ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸¸ 0.25 u Œ u ¨¨ ¸ ¨ ¸ ¸¸
¨© 2 ¹ ©2¹ m u oC ¨ © 2¹ ¹
©© ¹
© ¹ 2
(12)
An air filled drill hole contributes negligible thermal transfer. However, because the thermal conductivity of
copper is approximately 1,500 higher than FR4, the via of above dimensions is able to transfer heat to the
opposite side of the PCB through the via sidewalls approximately 400 times faster than an FR4 cylinder of
the same outer diameter. Therefore, placing multiple parallel non-filled vias can be a very effective method
to transfer heat quickly from one side of the PCB to the other within a localized area.
17 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement
Figure 12. GND Plane Does Not Extend To Temperature Sensor (Top View)
For even better results, create a separate a small copper plane on both sides of the sensor as shown in
Figure 13 and Figure 14 , and add several vias to thermally link the top and bottom planes together.
Because of the low thermal conductivity of the solder mask compared to copper (see Table 1), it is
advised to create a solder mask cut-out around the copper plane. This will allow the sensor to respond to
ambient air temperature measurements significantly faster than in systems in which the copper plane is
coated by solder mask. Add a physical gap between the plane around the sensor and the planes of the
rest of the PCB. Hatched GND planes in the main section of the PCB further reduce heat flow from other
ICs to the sensor.
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 18
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement www.ti.com
19 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 20
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement www.ti.com
Figure 16. Isolation Island Significantly Reduces Heat Transfer From Main Heat Source To Temperature
Sensor
21 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement
2.4 Perforation
As an alternative to the isolation island discussed in Section 2.3, it is possible to add a perforation around
the section with the temperature sensor, as shown in Figure 17. Doing so greatly minimizes the amount
heat transfer through the FR4 material. An example of a perforated PCB is the TMP116 Evaluation
module.
Figure 17. Perforation Reduces Heat Transfer From Heat Source To Temperature Sensor
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 22
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement www.ti.com
23 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Design Guidelines For Air Temperature Measurement
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 24
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Design Guidelines For Component Temperature Measurement www.ti.com
3.1 Location
The sensor location should be chosen to be as close as possible to the heat source that is to be
monitored. Avoid any perforations or slits in the PCB between the IC and the temperature sensor, as they
will reduce the thermal response.
Figure 20. Sensor Mounted On Opposite Side Of Heat Source; Multiple Vias Ensure Fast Heat Transfer
25 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Design Guidelines For Component Temperature Measurement
SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices 26
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Summary www.ti.com
4 Summary
When designing a PCB with a temperature sensor, the system designer needs to consider if the objective
is to measure ambient air temperature or to monitor the temperature of a nearby power hungry IC. This
application note discusses the background and layout techniques for both objectives. For ambient air
temperature measurements, physical isolation between the sensor and heat generating components on
the same PCB is critical. Additionally, consideration of thermally conductive paths such as GND planes
play an important role to ensure that nearby components do not cause false ambient temperature
readings. In contrast, measuring the die temperature of ICs requires careful consideration of sensor
location and a path with high thermal conductivity to create a fast thermal equilibrium between the sensor
and the heat generating IC.
27 Temperature sensors: PCB guidelines for surface mount devices SNOA967A – July 2017 – Revised January 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2017–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Revision History
Revision History
NOTE: Page numbers for previous revisions may differ from page numbers in the current version.
Application Brief
Efficient Cold Chain Management With Scalable High
Accuracy Temperature Sensors
From producers to consumers, it is important that temperature ranges. Based on the application, there
perishable items, especially food and medicines, are different topologies that may be deployed. In the
reach the end consumer in fresh and viable condition, point to point topology like that represented in Figure
so as to maintain their nutrients and efficacy. To 2 , a single microcontroller (MCU) is connected to a
ensure quality and product safety, manufacturers temperature sensor that may be an analog output or a
specify the temperatures at which the items must be digital output sensor. This is useful when managing a
transported and stored. pallet of goods or a temperature controlled container
during shipping.
Before reaching the consumer at their local grocery,
perishable produces like fruits, vegetables or frozen The TMP116 temperature sensor operates from -55°C
meals, spend a significant time in transportation and to +125°C with 0.2°C accuracy from -10°C to +85°C.
on the shelves of large refrigeration units as shown in It contains I2C and SMBus-interface communication,
Figure 1. The same is true of pharmaceuticals such as well as an integrated EEPROM memory. There is
as vaccines. Thus it becomes crucial that these items no calibration required for the TMP116, and minimal
be maintained at the correct temperature. current is consumed which minimizes self-heating.
The TMP116 is typically found in applications with a
Cold chain management and Good Distribution
heavy focus on high accuracy.
Practices (GDP) ensure that the right conditions
are met during every phase of the life cycle of Wireless Communication
Data Logger
SNOAA33A – MARCH 2019 – REVISED JANUARY 2022 Efficient Cold Chain Management With Scalable High-Accuracy Temperature 30
Submit Document Feedback Sensors
Copyright © 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated
TI Tech Note www.ti.com
I2C bus or out of band signaling using chip select communication interface of SMAART Wire ™ uses
which is the case with SPI. However, reliable power UART bus which is a standard peripheral on almost
delivery and signal integrity over a long chain may be all MCU, making it easier develop software, than
a concern. using bit-banged approach. At the same time, with
a daisy chain implementation, it makes it easier to
The daisy chain does not require out of band signaling
identify the location of a cable break, which enables
and rather uses in band addressing scheme. As each
easy maintenance and overall system reliability.
stage of the chain acts as a buffer for the next
chain, signal integrity may be maintained over longer
distances.
Wireless Communication
+ Temperature Temperature
Battery _ MCU Sensor 1 Sensor 2
Figure 4 shows the signal integrity of the TMP116 0.2°C accuracy across No daisy chain capability
temperature
communication interface at 9600 bps. The
31 Efficient Cold Chain Management With Scalable High-Accuracy Temperature SNOAA33A – MARCH 2019 – REVISED JANUARY 2022
Sensors Submit Document Feedback
Copyright © 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated
Design Challenges of Wireless Patient Temperature
Monitors
System Power
Power requirements will vary based on overall system
design, but most wireless patient monitors will need to
have enough energy storage for several years of shelf
life, and at least 48-72 hours of active life. Coin-cell
batteries can easily exceed these requirements for
energy capacity, but they are entirely rigid and may be
uncomfortable to device wearers. In the case of
patches which are not intended to be reused, a coin-
cell based solution can also be extremely wasteful.
An alternative option for energy storage is to use thin-
film, flexible batteries. Due to small storage capacities,
using these batteries will require that total system
power consumption be minimal. For only intermittent
temperature monitoring, systems powered with flexible
batteries can exceed the requirements for multiple
years of shelf-life and 48-72 hours active time. The
Figure 2. Example flex layer Stack, thickness design trade off between current consumption and
should be minimized to reduce thermal mass. additional features must be made by the system
designer.
Making System Tradeoffs
If the system is required to meet the requirements of
ASTM E1112 and ISO ISO-80601-2-56 following the
recommendations on layout is essential, but there are
other system design considerations to be made. For
patient comfort, non-temperature-sensing devices and
the RF region should be kept in as small an area as
possible. Keeping the populated region of the board
compact will reduce the portion of the monitor which
feels rigid to the wearer.
For RF communication, any wireless protocol that can
be made to work on a flex PCB is acceptable. Since
most wearable patient monitors will want to keep
Figure 3. Copper pour underneath TMP117 (Left), power consumption low, a BLE wireless
topside layout for TMP117 (U1, Right). The vias
underneath the TMP117 and the copper pour communication link is recommended. If the information
provide a thermal path between the patient's skin being transmitted from the monitor is only temperature,
and the device. the monitor can be configured to broadcast the
temperature reading alongside it's pairing ID. Sending
the information in this manner removes the
Self-Heating requirement for an actual connection to be made and
Regardless of the choice of sensing element and maintained, and will reduce system power
proper layout, the stringent accuracy requirements for consumption even further.
medical thermometers will require that device self- To get more information on these topics, or for general
heating be taken into consideration. Some self-heating tips when measuring temperature, please see the
will always be present from the resistive losses of the additional resources linked to in Table 1.
chosen sensing element. The TMP117, may be
configured for one-shot mode conversion and be kept Table 1. Related Materials
in shutdown mode between successive reads, to
minimize self-heating. Individual temperature readings Document Type Description
(using a configurable number of averaged readings) Wearable Temp-Sensing Layout
can be triggered using the one-shot feature of the Application Report Consideration Optimized for Thermal
device. Human body temperature will not Response
conventionally exhibit change on the order of seconds, Layout Considerations for Wearable
Tech Note
so taking these readings at 10 to 60 second intervals Temperature Sensing
is sufficient to monitor patient temperature over long Precise Temperature Measurements with
Tech Note
periods. This method has the added benefit of TMP116
extending the active-battery life of the system.
SNOAA28 – March 2019 RTD replacement in heat meters using digital temperature sensors 34
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com
0.2 applications.
0.1 Figure 4 shows the same block diagram of Heat Meter
0 system using the TMP117 to replace the RTDs. By
-0.1
using the TMP117 instead of an RTD, designers can
simplify both their software and system architecture to
-0.2
save time, board space, and costs.
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Temperature (qC) Accu
35 RTD replacement in heat meters using digital temperature sensors SNOAA28 – March 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
How to protect battery power management systems from
thermal damage
Introduction
To protect battery management systems (BMS) from
With a growing demand for portable personal thermal damage, either discrete or integrated
electronics, battery power management systems are temperature-sensing solutions are used. A discrete
becoming increasingly important for stringent design, solution consists of a thermistor, a comparator, and a
reliability, and safety requirements. Nowadays, voltage reference as shown in Figure 1. This approach
customers expect their personal electronics to have a provides real-time thermal protection without
longer battery life, a shorter charge time, and a smaller interrupting the control processing system. Since
form factor. The increased charge and discharge battery applications require protection at both hot and
currents, as well as the smaller form factor, make the cold temperatures, a temperature window comparator
battery packs vulnerable to thermal damage. In is better solution. An example of this output is
addition, different battery technologies have different displayed in Figure 2. In this example, the trip points
charging and discharging requirements that are are set to 60°C and 0°C with a 10°C hysteresis. Note
sensitive to temperature as shown in Table 1. that the Set Output High (SOH) is a system diagnostic
Typically, batteries can be discharged over a wider test feature that allows the user to force the output
temperature range, but the charge temperature is high independent of the temperature. The specific
limited. Note: fast charging can be done safely if the implementation depends on the application
cell temperature is kept between 10°C and 40°C. requirements:
These temperature limits are tied to the battery cell
chemistry due to its temperature dependent chemical • Features
reaction. If charged too quickly, the cell pressure can • Cost
build up and may lead to venting and reduced battery • Footprint
life. If the operating temperature is too high, cell
degradation can occur and may result in thermal • Power
runaway and explosion. On the other hand, if the • Accuracy
temperature is too low, irreversible cell chemical Some of the key features that customers typically look
reactions can occur and shorten battery life. Thus, for are hysteresis, trip point programmability, trip test,
battery temperature monitoring is very critical for qualifications (like automotive and UL, for example),
battery management systems. output type, channel count, and supply voltage range.
Table 1. Common Charge and Discharge
Temperature Limits for Various Batteries
TH = 60°C
Battery 50°C
Charge Temperature Discharge Temperature
Type Measured
Temperature
Lead Acid –20°C to 50°C –20°C to 50°C
10°C
NiCd, NiMH 0°C to 45°C –20°C to 65°C 5°C
TL = 0°C
HYSTSET0
OUT
Time
SNOA995A – June 2018 – Revised January 2019 How to protect battery power management systems from thermal damage 36
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com
Field transmitters are used extensively in factory Because the thermocouple measures a differential
automation and control-to-sense process parameters temperature, the temperature at the cold junction must
like temperature, pressure, and flow rate, to name a be known to determine the temperature at the hot
few. The sensors used in the field transmitters are junction—this process is known as cold junction
mostly analog sensors that must be sampled compensation (CJC).
accurately using an analog front-end (AFE).
Platinum RTDs are popularly used to measure the
Due to the operational conditions that arise from the temperature of the cold junction due to their high
placement of the field transmitters, it may be subjected accuracy. Figure 2 shows a block diagram of a cold
to wide varying temperature conditions and hence, junction-compensated thermocouple system using an
require some form of temperature compensation. RTD reference.
Traditionally, accurate temperature sensors like
Platinum resistance temperature detector (RTD) are
used in such temperature compensation systems.
RTDs are most commonly used temperature-sensing
components in industrial applications where high
accuracy and longevity is desired.
Most RTD applications use a current source to excite
the RTD element and create a voltage difference
across the RTD, as shown in Figure 1. This voltage is
proportional to the resistance of the RTD and the
excitation current. The voltage potential is amplified,
converted to a digital output by an ADC, and then fed Figure 2. CJC Using RTD System Block Diagram
into an MCU where a lookup table is used to convert
the digital output to temperature. However, while the system block diagram looks quite
simple, there are a lot of considerations like noise,
self-heating, and placement considerations that must
be carefully analyzed. Also, RTDs are sensitive to
trace routing and the trace lengths must be matched.
A lot of these considerations may be optimized to
reduce complexity and cost by replacing RTDs with
temperature-sensing ICs like the TMP117 digital
temperature sensor.
Replacing RTD With TMP117 Digital Temp Sensors
The TMP117 is a digital temperature sensor designed
for low-power, high-accuracy applications. The device
Figure 1. Basic RTD Circuit provides a 16-bit temperature result with a resolution
of 0.0078°C, along with a factory-calibrated
RTDs in Cold Junction Compensation Systems performance of ±0.1°C across –25°C to +50°C or
±0.3°C across the full operating range of –55°C to
Thermocouples are temperature-sensing devices that +150°C, which exceeds the accuracy of a Class-AA
cover a large temperature range and are made by RTD. Figure 3 depicts the results of an oil bath
joining wires of two different metals. Due to seebeck experiment conducted on the TMP117. The graph
effect, the output voltage is approximately proportional shows that TMP117 can meet the accuracy of a thin
to the difference in temperature between the hot film Class AA RTD for a CJC application.
junction and cold junction.
xxxx
leverage temperature to dynamically adjust Thermal design limit
performance. To enhance system reliability and
xxxx
Safety margin
maximize performance, it is often desirable to monitor
processor temperature. Higher temperatures can
xx
Performance
activate a cooling fan, modify a system clock, or,
should the thermal threshold of the processor be
1oC Accuracy
exceeded, quickly shut down the system completely.
Applications such as infotainment, ADAS, servers,
4oC Accuracy
notebooks, and aerospace and defense systems can
take advantage of these thermal monitoring
techniques.
Measurement Error
Figure 2. Performance of a System Can be
Enhanced Though High-Accuracy Thermal
Monitoring
SNOAA29A – February 2019 – Revised October 2019 High-Performance Processor Die Temperature Monitoring 40
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com
geometry and other process variables. If the Figure 4. Sensor Placement for High-Performance
Ideality Factor n is known, the n-factor register Processor Temperature Monitoring
can be used to correct the n-factor error.
Alternatively, software calibration methods can i. Location a: Sensor located in a hole drilled into
be used to correct this in the desired the center of the heat sink of the microprocessor
temperature range. provides close proximity. The heat sink can be
Series Resistance— Due to the current source, any clipped to the processor or attached with epoxy,
resistance in the signal path appears as a and generally sits on top of the processor. These
voltage offset. Modern remote temperature typically require long leads, and as the heat sink-to-
sensors employ a series resistance cancellation microprocessor thermal connection degrades, the
algorithm that removes temperature error due to sensor data becomes incorrect.
resistance up to 1–2 kΩ. This enables robust, ii. Location b: Another potential location is in the
accurate measurements, even when coupled cavity beneath a socketed processor, with which
with RC Filters. assembly is straightforward. Given the sensor is
isolated from the airflow, ambient temperature has
Noise Injection— EMI or inductive coupling into the minimal impact on the sensor reading. Additionally,
remote junction PCB traces can cause error if the heat sink gets detached from the processor,
when diode traces run in parallel with high- the sensor indicates an increase in processor
frequency signal lines carrying high currents. temperature. That said, given the sensor
Tracing remote temperature sensors need to placement, the temperature differences between
consider this during board design. the sensor and the processor case are 5°C to
10°C.
Beta Compensation— Thermal Transistors
integrated into an FPGA or processor may have iii. Location c: The sensor can be mounted on the
Beta < 1. A remote temperature sensor with circuit board next to the MPU. While this is simple
Beta Compensation is specifically designed to to implement, the correlation between sensor
work with these transistors, and to correct temperature and MPU temperature is much
temperature measurement errors associated weaker.
with them. The Beta Compensation feature Device Recommendation
provides no benefit when used with a typical
discrete transistor. Footprint size is a factor in selecting a local
temperature sensor. The TMP112 with a 1.6 x 1.6 mm
Device Recommendation can be used in close proximity of the processor and
TMP46x devices offer high-accuracy temperature gain a good accuracy of 0.5°C. This can maximize
measurements to monitor up to eight remote BJTs, as performance when compared to a 5°C to 20°C that is
well as the local temperature. Many commercial typically observed in temperature sensors integrated
applications can benefit from such multi-channel within processors.
remote sensors. The TMP451-Q1 offers an automotive
qualified high-accuracy remote and local temperature Table 1. Key Collaterals
sensor for automotive applications. COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION
External Temperature Sensor Remote Temperature Optimizing Remote Diode Temperature Sensor
Sensor Design
Some processors have built-in temperature sensor. Local Temperature Temperature Sensors: PCB Guidelines for Surface
While the location is ideal, the built-in sensors make Sensor Mount Devices
them less accurate due to variations across the wafers Board Temperature
Monitoring Board Temperature
Monitoring
and different lots. Additionally, it is essential to trim the
processor based on a reference; this reference is
compared with die temperature to adjust the
coefficients. Given the complex circuitry, the
processors incur self-heating that builds an error. This
error increases with increases in temperature.
41 High-Performance Processor Die Temperature Monitoring SNOAA29A – February 2019 – Revised October 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Application Report
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Mihail Gurevitch
ABSTRACT
Engineers must carefully consider the overall system design when designing high-precision temperature
measurement applications. This application note provides recommendations on how to design a precise
temperature measuring system based on the TMP116 and TMP117 temperature sensors. By following this
application note, the user should be able to design a precise measuring system which adheres to the
performance specifications of the TMP116/117.
Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 2
2 TMP116 and TMP117 Device Differences ............................................................................... 2
3 PCB Considerations ......................................................................................................... 3
4 Measuring Solid Surface Temperature ................................................................................... 3
5 Measuring Human Body Temperature ................................................................................... 5
6 Measuring Still Air Temperature .......................................................................................... 6
7 Measuring Moving Air Temperature ...................................................................................... 6
8 Measuring Thermal Resistance in Different Environments ............................................................ 8
9 Soldering to PCB ............................................................................................................ 9
10 Self-Heating ................................................................................................................. 11
11 Self-Heating Estimation Example ........................................................................................ 12
12 Supply Voltage Change .................................................................................................. 14
13 Data Averaging ............................................................................................................. 14
14 Summary ................................................................................................................... 15
List of Figures
1 Simplified Schematic of Temperature Flow During Solid Surface Measurement ................................... 3
2 PCB Layout Example for Rigid Surface Temperature Measuring ..................................................... 5
3 Moving Air Temperature Measurements Noise. Air Speed 0.5, 1 and 2 Meter/Sec. Averaging 8 Samples
Per Reading. 5 Consecutive Measurements at Room Temperature. ................................................. 7
4 PCB Layout Example for Air Temperature Measuring .................................................................. 8
5 Printed-Circuit Boards Used ............................................................................................... 9
6 Soldering Shift at +25ºC and Supply 3.3 V With Thermal Pad Soldered on a Rigid PCB. ...................... 10
7 Soldering Shift for TMP116/117 Without the Thermal Pad Soldered to the PCB. +25ºC, V = +3.3 V .......... 10
8 Device Consumption Power vs Temperature and Part Supply Voltage in Continuous Conversion Mode.
No Pauses Between Conversions, No I2C Bus Activity. ............................................................. 11
9 Supply Current vs. Pin Input Voltage and Device Supply Voltage for Any Digital Pin Input Cell. ............... 12
10 Device Supply Current vs. I2C Bus Clocking Frequency and Supply Voltage. Part is in Shutdown Mode,
but SCL, SDA, and ADD0 Pins are Under Constant I2C Data Flow. ............................................... 12
11 TMP116/117 Coupon Board Self-Heating Effect vs. Time and Supply Voltage in Still +25ºC Air. ............. 13
12 The TMP116/117 Sampling Distribution for 3 Different Oil Bath Temperatures and 3.3-V Supply Voltage.
No Data Averaging. ........................................................................................................ 14
13 The TMP116/117 Sampling Distribution for 3 Different Supply Voltages at +25ºC. No Data Averaging. ...... 15
14 Temperature Sampling Noise With 8, 32, and 64 Internal Averages. Temperature +25ºC and V = +3.3 V. .. 15
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 42
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Introduction www.ti.com
Trademarks
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
1 Introduction
There are many system factors which can negatively affect the precision of temperature measurements,
and these must be addressed to achieve a high accuracy. The main parameters that affect measurement
precision with the corresponding source of their control are:
• The accuracy of the temperature sensor itself as its accuracy, stability, and repeatability, are set by the
manufacturer and out of the designer’s control.
• The system engineer controls the supply voltage range and noise, the sensor conversion mode, the
system power consumption, the data sampling rate, the communication bus voltage, the I2C bus
frequency, and data flow over it.
• The PCB designer controls the mounting and position of the sensor on the PCB, the temperature
resistance between the sensor and the measured object, and the temperature “leakage” from the
sensor to surrounding air.
These parameters are important for precise temperature measurements and must be analyzed during the
system design. The purpose of this article is to provide recommendations to the system designer, based
on experience obtained in part characterization and device use in real applications.
When using the TMP116/117 for precise temperature measurements, there are a few critical
considerations that must be accounted for by the system designer:
• Proper PCB sensor location and orientation in the system. The proper location must provide the
precise temperature measurement with minimal offset and minimal time delay.
• Proper device electrical and communication interface mode, which can minimize measurement noise,
minimize part self-heating and ensure measurements stability.
• Proper PCB material and thickness, PCB mounting, and PCB layout. All these should provide a
minimal temperature difference between the sensor and the measured object, and should minimize
sensor response time when an object temperature is changing.
Additionally, the TMP117 has a register to compensate the temperature offset and a reset bit in the
configuration register. Both parts are in the same 6-pin DRV package, but the TMP117 also has a smaller
WCSP-6 package version with a 1.5-mm × 1.0-mm × 0.5-mm die size. All conclusions found for either
device listed in this application note will apply to both the TMP116 and TMP117.
43 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com PCB Considerations
3 PCB Considerations
There are two main tasks in temperature measurements: measuring air (gas) temperature and measuring
temperature of a solid surface. A liquid temperature measurement usually falls in one of the above,
because the sensor is often placed inside a metallic probe for liquid measurements. These two different
tasks dictate two different approaches to device mounting. However, in all cases, these common rules
must be applied:
• To get the manufacturer ensured measurement precision, the 0.1-µF bypass capacitor must be placed
no more than 5 mm (200 mils) away from the device
• To avoid possible heat influence coming from the pullup resistor on the SDA pin and the pullup resistor
on the SCL and ALERT pins (if present), the pins must be placed at least 10 mm (400 mils) away from
the device.
• If there is a risk that the board may bend during PCB mounting, all efforts to prevent the mechanical
tension on the device package must be taken. Guard holes in the PCB around the part can help in this
case.
On this schematic:
• Tobj is the measured object temperature.
• Tair is the environment temperature (typically air).
• Ts is the sensor temperature.
• Rso is the thermal resistance between the sensor and the object.
• Rsa is the thermal resistance between the sensor and the air (environment).
• Ps is the averaged power dissipated by the sensor during the measurement.
• Mt is the combined thermal mass of device, plus the surrounding PCB area.
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 44
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Measuring Solid Surface Temperature www.ti.com
The most important formula for the precise temperature measurement is:
§ Tobj Tair ·
Tofs ¨ ¸ u R so
© R so + R sa ¹ (1)
Ts Tobj Tofs
where
• Tofs is a temperature offset between the measured object and sensor. (2)
Equation 1 shows that the sensor temperature offset is zero only in two cases: if Rso is zero or Rsa is
infinite. If there is a difference between Tobj and Tair (and despite all efforts to make Rsa >> Rso), however,
there will always be some offset between sensor and object temperature. This shift will increase when the
difference between Tobj and Tair is larger, or when Rsa becomes smaller and approaches to Rso value.
Let's calculate temperature offsets for two metallic object temperatures (+50°C and +100°C) where still air
temperature stays the same +25°C and the temperature resistance from sensor to object surface
assumed from line 6 of Table 2 (140m°C/mWt). Let's also assume that the temperature resistance
between sensor and air is equal to line 1 of Table 2 (300m°C/Wt). For object temperatures +50°C and
+100°C, the measurement offset, according to Equation 1, will be 7.9°C and 23.8°C accordingly, which is
not acceptable for precise measurements. TI recommends to use a thinner PCB with a better layout, and
cover the top surface of PCB with thermal isolating foam. The best solution to avoid temperature leakage
to the surrounding air may be to make a cave-kind cavern in the object body and put the PCB of the
sensor inside it, but this kind solution is not always available.
If the sensor temperature shift from the object temperature is too big and cannot be ignored, a system
calibration is needed. In some cases, it should be done for different combinations of Tobj and Tair. This
happens because Rsa is not a linear parameter, and instead depends on the air speed, air moisture, air
temperature, PCB orientation, and so on. All this makes the Rsa value estimation very difficult to find.
However, by making Rso as small as possible and Rsa as big as possible, it would be much easier to
minimize the temperature shift.
Another important aspect is when designers can trust the sensor readings, like when the object
temperature changes from Tobj1 to Tobj2. To estimate or understand the process of this temperature change,
we can use a Gaussian formula for an ideal case. In reality, the object temperature rarely changes
instantly, and therefore the sensor follows the object temperature slower than Equation 3 shows.
t / tr
Ts Tobj1 Tobj2 Tobj1 u e
where
• t is a time passing from beginning object temperature change.
• tr is a response time. (3)
tr R so u M t (4)
Here we can assume that Rsa >> Rso and ignore the temperature leakage to environment. According to
formula, to have minimal measurement delay, it is important to have a small response time (tr), which
means the Rso and Mt should be kept at minimal value, especially if the object temperature changes fast.
Because the device is dissipating some power during the measurements, the sensor is heating itself. The
self-heating temperature shift Tsh is calculate by Equation 5.
Tsh Ps u R so (5)
The influence of self-heating on measurement precision is discussed in Section 10.
The following are the recommendations for systems measuring rigid surface temperature:
• Use a PCB with minimal thickness.
• The side of the PCB that makes contact with the surface to be measured should be covered with an
exposed copper layer (and not covered with a solder mask). To prevent copper oxidation, a gold or
melted solder paste cover should be used.
• To improve thermal contact to the surface, consider adding a thermal conducting paste or sticky
thermal film between the surface and the PCB.
45 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Measuring Human Body Temperature
• Place additional vias to connect copper layers on both sides of the PCB. Generally, a via has 400
times less thermal-resistance than the same area of regular PCB material. Using a filled via further
decreases the thermal resistance.
• If the PCB internal layers are not used under the device, it is recommended to create internal copper
polygons under the sensors to reduce the PCB side-to-side thermal resistance.
• To increase the temperature resistance to surrounding air, minimize the amount of copper wires on top
of the board.
• To increase thermal resistance to surrounding air, the sensor and the PCB surface exposed to the air
must be covered with thermal-isolating foam, film, or at least with some stain. This protection is
especially important for precise measurements when air around the sensor is moving.
• To minimize the convection air influence, the PCB should be located horizontally and out of any air
flow.
• Soldering the device's thermal pad (TP) to the PCB may be a good choice only for systems which
undergo calibration. The negative aspects of TP soldering are described in Section 9. If the TP is
soldered, it should be connected to ground or left floating. Connecting the package TP to a voltage
other than system ground can lead to permanent device damage.
Figure 2 shows an example of a PCB layout for surface temperature measuring.
(1) Alert pin is not used and grounded. I2C bus pullup resistors are located on master board.
Figure 2. PCB Layout Example for Rigid Surface Temperature Measuring
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 46
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Measuring Still Air Temperature www.ti.com
masks above the planes. To avoid oxidation, cover the exposed copper plane with gold or a melted
soldering material.
• Use a bypass capacitor with minimal dimensions to reduce thermal mass.
• Place pullup resistors away from the sensor.
• Depending on the design, cover the sensor and top side of PCB with a thermal-isolating compound.
The second case is a monitoring case where sensor attached to the body for a long period of time. In this
scenario, the temperature is changing very slowly and samples are taken less frequently (like once every
16 sec). It is easy to make a good thermal contact to a body and minimize temperature leakage. Bigger
sensor thermal mass may be useful as a low-frequency filter working to reduce temperature fluctuation
(noise). This can reduce the averaging number down to 1 during sampling, which lowers the power
consumption and extends the battery life. Bigger sensor thermal mass also reduces device self-heating
during conversions.
• Use a flexible PCB to make better temperature contact to the body.
• Cover the PCB side that makes direct contact with the human body with a copper plane. Remove the
solder masks above the planes. To avoid oxidation, cover the exposed copper plane with gold or a
melted soldering material.
• To make PCB maximal flexible and to increase PCB reliability, use the smallest size capacitor and
place the pullup resistors away from the sensor.
• To prevent temperature leakage and protect device contacts from oxidation, cover the top side of the
board with a thermal-isolating protection compound.
47 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Measuring Moving Air Temperature
Figure 3. Moving Air Temperature Measurements Noise. Air Speed 0.5, 1 and 2 Meter/Sec. Averaging 8
Samples Per Reading. 5 Consecutive Measurements at Room Temperature.
The standard approach to reduce the noise is to increase the sample average number, but an alternate
method is to increase the sensor thermal response time in Equation 4.
Increased response time works as a low-pass filter, and it reduces the measurements noise. Knowing
response time tr, the designer can calculate the filter 3db cut-off frequency, Fc=1/tr. However, it is difficult
to estimate the effective combined thermal mass and effective thermal resistance between the sensor and
moving air, due to its dependents of many non-linear factors.
Moving air provides a good thermal contact to the sensor, and there can be a rare case where the sensor
can have the same temperature as a measured object. Low thermal resistance to moving air also
minimizes the device self-heating effect.
• Because moving air temperature usually has a lot of fluctuations, the PCB increased thermal mass can
reduce measurement noise. Therefore, it is acceptable in these cases to use a PCB with increased
thickness.
• Place the PCB vertically along air flow. This makes air flow smooth and prevent air “shades”.
• Design PCB soldering pads bigger than usual, especially the package corner pads. This will improve
the thermal contact from package to air.
• Cover both side of unused board space with a copper layer,
• Use a PCB with thicker copper layers, if possible. This improves thermal conductivity along the PCB,
and it allows better “average” temperature fluctuations from different parts of the board.
• If air (or gas) is expected to contain moisture or includes some corrosive components, the device pins
must be protected by a stain to avoid corrosion or moisture accumulation on the pins.
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 48
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Measuring Thermal Resistance in Different Environments www.ti.com
(1) Alert pin is not used and grounded. I2C pullup resistors are located on master board.
Figure 4. PCB Layout Example for Air Temperature Measuring
49 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Soldering to PCB
9 Soldering to PCB
Soldering the TMP116/117 to a PCB can create significant package stress and degrade the absolute
accuracy. The measuring error of a TMP116/117 device in an oil bath before and after soldering often
shows an increase in the error, especially on rigid PCBs with the thermal pad soldered. This soldering shift
can be significant for precise measurements. Figure 5 shows the boards used in soldering shift tests. All
measurements were made in an oil bath.
In Figure 5, Board A is the socketed board used for testing loose devices prior to soldering. Board B is a
flexible PCB, and board C is a rigid PCB. Both used for testing devices after soldering.
Figure 7 shows the impact of soldering for 16 devices soldered to a rigid coupon boards. In Figure 7, parts
were measured in an oil bath at +25ºC with a 3.3-V supply before and after soldering. In this case, the
package thermal pad was also soldered to the coupon board. The average soldering shift in the example
is around 20mºC, but for device #4456, it reaches 50mºC. According to our research, the soldering shift is
not predictable, can be positive or negative, and, in the worst case, can reach ±100mºC.
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 50
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Soldering to PCB www.ti.com
130
120 Loose Units in sockets
110 Coupon Boards
100
Figure 6. Soldering Shift at +25ºC and Supply 3.3 V With Thermal Pad Soldered on a Rigid PCB.
Furthermore, the soldering shift can be different for different temperatures, which makes it even less
predictable.
The main reason for the soldering shift is mechanical tension coming to the silicon die through the
package from the PCB and the hardened solder. When the temperature drops in the reflow oven, the
solder hardens and fixes the thermal pad and package pin locations. But package material continues to
contract, and because the solder and the rigid PCB have different contraction coefficients than device
package, it creates the mechanical tension which leads to package bending and therefore creates
tensions in the silicon die. However, when the package thermal pad is not soldered, the bending forces
are applied only to the package pins, which have much less mechanical contact to the silicon die.
Figure 7 shows the effects of soldering when the thermal pad is not soldered to the PCB. In this case, the
accuracy shift is much less and the worst-case offset is only 15 mC.
20
15
10
Temperature Error (mC)
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25 Loose Units
Coupon Boards
-30
1770
1773
1771
1772
2109
2115
1769
2111
2419
1459
2421
2420
1460
1765
2418
2107
D003
Device Number
Figure 7. Soldering Shift for TMP116/117 Without the Thermal Pad Soldered to the PCB. +25ºC, V = +3.3 V
The reasonable question is: when the thermal pad is not soldered, by how much will the thermal
resistance between the sensor and the PCB going to increase? In conducted experiments, the device was
soldered to a rigid coupon board 11-mm × 22-mm × 1.1-mm size with no vias under the part and a copper
radiator was attached to the opposite side of PCB. (The silicon thermo conductive paste between copper
radiator and PCB back side was applied). The measurements showed that not soldering the package
thermo pad increased the thermal resistance from 75 to 140ºC/Wt. By knowing the thermal resistance and
device thermal mass Mt = 5.1 mJ/ºC, it is possible to calculate the sensor thermal response time with
Equation 4.
51 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Self-Heating
The calculated response time values are 0.39 and 0.72 seconds and measured response time matched
the calculated values. Because the device package thermal mass is extremely small, the thermal
response time is also very small and even the 0.72 second value, when the thermal pad is not soldered,
satisfies most users applications.
Here are the recommendations on how to minimize the soldering shift in the TMP116/117 parts:
• To maintain device manufacturer precision, in case the system calibration is not planned, TI highly
recommends not to solder the package thermal pad to avoid a soldering shift.
• Use the standard reflow oven soldering process with a maximum temperature to +250ºC for one
minute.
• Manual soldering is not acceptable because it creates additional stress on the device package,
resulting in soldering shift as large as ±150mºC.
• Using a flexible PCB with thickness less than 6 mil (0.15 mm) creates minimal mechanical tensions
and minimal soldering shift even in the case when the thermal pad is soldered.
• When using a flexible PCB with thickness more than 6 mil (0.15 mm), the thermal pad must not be
soldered. The flexible PCB minimizes the thermal mass and thermal resistance, which may improve
measurement precision.
10 Self-Heating
To achieve the best measurement accuracy, the TMP116/117 part is specially designed to dissipate
minimal power and minimize the part temperature change due to self-heating. In typical conditions (supply
voltage is 3.3 V, 8 samples average, one data collection per second), the TMP116/117 dissipates 53 uWt
at +25°C. However, when operating with a higher supply voltage and taking more frequent measurements,
the power dissipation can increase to almost 1 mWt. Figure 8 shows the power dissipation as a function of
the device temperature at different voltage supplies.
1.1
1.8 V 4.1 V
1
2.6 V 4.8 V
0.9 3.3 V 5.5 V
0.8
0.7
Power (mWt)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Temperature (qC) D011
Figure 8. Device Consumption Power vs Temperature and Part Supply Voltage in Continuous Conversion
Mode. No Pauses Between Conversions, No I2C Bus Activity.
The power consumption in user measurements is usually significantly less than 1 mWt, but to make the
most accurate measurement and reduce any influence of self-heating, all efforts to reduce the dissipation
power must be taken. Here are recommendations on how to reduce the device power consumption:
• Use the minimal supply voltage acceptable for the system. This is especially important when the
device is in continuous conversion mode without the pauses.
• Use one-shot conversion mode or use a conversion cycle mode where the device goes into standby
after a conversion.
• Use pullup resistors larger than 5 kΩ on the SDA, SCL, and ALERT pins. Place resistors at least 10
mm from the TMP116/117 to reduce any influence from the resistor's heat dissipation.
• Ensure that the SCL and SDA signal levels are below 10% and above 90% of the device supply
voltage. If the SCL, SDA, and ADD0 pin input voltages are close to ground or device supply level, the
current going through the digital pin input cell is low, which minimizes the sensor heating (see
Figure 9). Remember that the I2C bus voltage can go up to 6 V and is not limited by the applied supply
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 52
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Self-Heating Estimation Example www.ti.com
voltage.
• Avoid heavy bypass traffic on the I2C bus. Remember that the intensive communication to other
devices on the same bus increases the TMP116/117 supply current, even if the device is in shutdown
mode (see Figure 10).
• Use the highest available communication speed. To increase the SCL and SDA rising edge speeds,
use a bus pullup voltage higher than the device supply voltage.
650
600 5.5 V
4.4 V
550 3.3 V
500 2V
450
ISUPPLY (uA)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VIN/V+ (%) D005
Figure 9. Supply Current vs. Pin Input Voltage and Device Supply Voltage for Any Digital Pin Input Cell.
100
5.5 V
90 4.5 V
80 3.3 V
1.9 V
Supply Current (uA)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
I2C Bus Frequency (MHz) D006
Figure 10. Device Supply Current vs. I2C Bus Clocking Frequency and Supply Voltage. Part is in
Shutdown Mode, but SCL, SDA, and ADD0 Pins are Under Constant I2C Data Flow.
53 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Self-Heating Estimation Example
• The system calibration takes care of self-heating and all other effects.
• The device average consumption power is less than 0.1 mWt.
• The thermal resistance between the sensor and measured object is small.
In this list, the most difficult parameter to estimate is the thermal resistance between the sensor and the
environment. The estimation is difficult because it depends on many poorly controlled factors. Here is a
recommendation on how to estimate the device object thermal resistance in a real application environment
and then calculate a possible self-heating temperature rise for a worst case scenario. The idea is to
measure the self-heating for some fixed supply voltage and fixed environment temperature, and then
extrapolate results over an entire voltage and temperature range.
Figure 11 shows an example of the self-heating effect on positioning the coupon boards horizontally in a
"still air box", with a TMP116/117 placed on top of the board. At time zero, the device is switched from
shutdown mode to continuous conversion mode with a 64 sampling averaging and no pauses between
conversions. There is no heating from the I2C bus activity because the data reading happens only once
per second. The temperature change on Figure 11 happens only due to device dissipated power and
following self-heating. Let's calculate the thermal resistance between the part and its environment.
80
5.5 V
70 5V
4V
Temperature Change (mC)
60 3V
1.9 V
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time (seconds) D007
Figure 11. TMP116/117 Coupon Board Self-Heating Effect vs. Time and Supply Voltage in Still +25ºC Air.
For example, assume the customer test was done with a 3-V supply and air temperature +25ºC. We see
the device temperature stabilized after 90 seconds with 40mºC self-heating value. According to Figure 8,
the consumption power for this mode is 0.36 mWt for a 3-V supply. So, the thermal-resistance between
the device and surrounding air is Rt = 40mºC/ 0.36 mWt = 111C/Wt. Now, knowing the thermal resistance,
it is possible to calculate the self-heating offset for other situations. For example, if the air temperature is
+125ºC and the supply voltage is 4 V according to Figure 8, the dissipated power would be 0.65mWt and
self-heating temperature offset would be Tsh = 111C/Wt x 0.65mWt = 72m°C. The 80-second long settling
time here is associated with stabilization time of air convection process in the “still air box”. if the box size
changes, the self-heating and stabilization time will also change.
As a reminder, this example above is a worst-case scenario where the thermal resistance between the
device and environment is high and device is continuously converting. It does demonstrate, however, that
self-heating can occur and must be considered when trying to achieve the best precision. If the
experiment is repeated with moving air, the self-heating offset will be much smaller and could become
negligible. But in all cases, the recommendation is the same: minimize the device dissipated power.
The easiest way to minimize the dissipated power is to limit the rate at which the temperature is sampled.
If we used device default mode (8 sample averaging with sampling rate 1 Hz) in the example above, the
average supply current would be 16 µA, the dissipated power would be only 48 µWt, and the self-heating
would only be 5.3m°C, which is less than sensor resolution and is negligible.
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 54
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Supply Voltage Change www.ti.com
13 Data Averaging
The TMP116/117 can be configured to take multiple measurements and provide the resultant average as
the result. Figure 12 and Figure 13 show the output temperature distribution with no averaging for 3
temperatures, and no averaging for different supply voltages. In all these cases, the standard deviation of
the readings is about 1 LSB, and data distribution covers an area approximately of six neighboring codes,
which match the ±3 sigma rule. This leads to the important conclusion that sensor internal noise is the
same for whole temperature range –55ºC to +150ºC, and the whole supply voltage range 1.9 V (1.8 V) to
5.5 V. Based on this data, the sensor internal noise without averaging in ideal bath condition can be
estimated as ±25m°C.
50
40qC (St. Dev. = 1.12)
45 25qC (St. Dev. = 1.01)
125qC (St. Dev. = 1.05)
40
35
Appearing in %
30
25
20
15
10
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Data Distribution (LSB) D008
Figure 12. The TMP116/117 Sampling Distribution for 3 Different Oil Bath Temperatures
and 3.3-V Supply Voltage. No Data Averaging.
55 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
www.ti.com Summary
50
V = 1.9 V (St. Dev. = 0.91)
45 V = 3.3 V (St. Dev. = 1.01)
V = 5 V (St. Dev. = 0.96)
40
35
Appearing in %
30
25
20
15
10
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Data Distribution (LSB) D009
Figure 13. The TMP116/117 Sampling Distribution for 3 Different Supply Voltages at +25ºC.
No Data Averaging.
The TMP116/117 provides an internal mechanism for averaging 8, 32, and 64 consequent samples
controlled by the configuration register. As shown in Figure 14, even the 8 samples averaging reduces the
internal noise distribution to a theoretical minimum of 2 LSB. This means that if the measured temperature
changes slowly and has no temperature fluctuations, the supply voltage is stable and has no glitches, and
there is no heavy bypassing traffic on I2C bus, the 8 samples averaging is enough to neutralize the
internal sensor noise and provide stable temperature readings. However, if the measured conditions are
far from ideal, higher averaging numbers are recommended.
80
Average 8 (St. Dev. = 0.51)
Average 32 (St. Dev. = 0.56)
70 Average 64 (St. Dev. = 0.61)
60
50
Appearing in %
40
30
20
10
0
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Data Distribution (LSB) D010
Figure 14. Temperature Sampling Noise With 8, 32, and 64 Internal Averages.
Temperature +25ºC and V = +3.3 V.
14 Summary
The TMP116/117 provides excellent precision, small power consumption, extremely small thermal mass,
and averaging tools with wide temperature and supply range. To achieve best performance, system
designers must follow the recommendations in this application note and product data sheets.
SNOA986A – April 2018 – Revised August 2019 Precise Temperature Measurements With the TMP116 and TMP117 56
Submit Documentation Feedback
Copyright © 2018–2019, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Revision History www.ti.com
Revision History
NOTE: Page numbers for previous revisions may differ from page numbers in the current version.
Important Notice: The products and services of Texas Instruments Incorporated and its subsidiaries described herein are sold subject to TI’s standard terms and conditions of sale.
Customers are advised to obtain the most current and complete information about TI products and services before placing orders. TI assumes no liability for applications assistance,
customer’s applications or product designs, software performance, or infringement of patents. The publication of information regarding any other company’s products or services does not
constitute TI’s approval, warranty or endorsement thereof.
Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2022, Texas Instruments Incorporated