0% found this document useful (0 votes)
107 views7 pages

Sample Scoring Template-Output

This document contains a School-Based Management (SBM) Level of Practice Validation Form for Dulag SPED Center for School Year 2019-2020. It consists of two parts: Part I assesses the school's performance improvement in the areas of Access, Efficiency and Quality, giving the school an overall rating of "Better". Part II evaluates the school's SBM practices in the areas of Leadership and Governance, Curriculum and Instruction, Accountability and Continuous Improvement, and Management of Resources, rating the school's SBM level as "Maturing". The overall assessment finds the school's SBM level to be at Level II "Maturing" with a weighted rating of 1.953. The

Uploaded by

John Carlo JoCap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
107 views7 pages

Sample Scoring Template-Output

This document contains a School-Based Management (SBM) Level of Practice Validation Form for Dulag SPED Center for School Year 2019-2020. It consists of two parts: Part I assesses the school's performance improvement in the areas of Access, Efficiency and Quality, giving the school an overall rating of "Better". Part II evaluates the school's SBM practices in the areas of Leadership and Governance, Curriculum and Instruction, Accountability and Continuous Improvement, and Management of Resources, rating the school's SBM level as "Maturing". The overall assessment finds the school's SBM level to be at Level II "Maturing" with a weighted rating of 1.953. The

Uploaded by

John Carlo JoCap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM (with sample computation)


SY: __________________

School: DULAG SPED CENTER District: DULAG SOUTH


Division: LEYTE Date of Assessment/Validation:_____________

Part – I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.

2017-2018 319 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)


2018-2019 425 33.23 2-average (at least 5% increase)
2019-2020 414 -2.29 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase = 15.23% High = 3

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout % of Decrease Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 7.06)
2017-2018 .01 4.94/7.06(100) = 69.97 ; 4.94 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.);
2018-2019 .02 2.94/7.06(100) = 41.64 ; 2.94 (2% dec.)
2019-2020 .02 -2.06/7.06 (100) = -29.17% ; -2.06 2-average (at least 50% dec); (4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease = 27.48% ; 1.94% 0
School Year Completion % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2017-2018 98.89 -8/75(100) = -10.66 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2018-2019 87.78 -5/75(100) = -6.66 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2019-2020 95.43 3/75 (100) = 4% 3-high (at least 10 increase)
Average Increase = -13.32% 0
School Year Cohort % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Surv. Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2017-2018 46 5/75 (100) = 6.66% 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2018-2019 79 12/75 (100) = 16% 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2019-2020 89 3/75 (100) = 4% 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase = 8.88% Average = 2
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR + CR + CSR / 3 = 0 + 0 + 2 = 2 /3 = = .66

C. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67% Sec. = 48%
2017-2018 45 -2/67(100) = -2.98% 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem.; 7%
2018-2019 69 11/67(100) = 16.41% Sec. increase)
2019-2020 3/67 (100) = 4.47% 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
Sec. increase)
3-high (at least 7% Elem.; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase = 5.97% Average = 2

SUMMARY:
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45% 3 x 0.45 1.35
Efficiency 25% .66 x 0.25 0.165
Quality 30% 2 x 0.30 0.6
Total 100% 2.115 = Better
INTERPRETATION: ______________
Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment
Better: 1.5 – 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 – 3.0
Sample Score Sheet for Part-II
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1=2 2x2=4 1x3=3
Average Rating 2+4+3/5 = 1.8
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
Computation per Level 4x1 2x2 1x3
Average Rating 4+4+3/7 = 1.57
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1 3x2 0
Average Rating 2+6+0/5 = 1.6
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1 1x2 2x3
Average Rating 2+2+6/5 = 2.0

SUMMARY:
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30% 1.8 x 0.3 0.54
B 30% 1.57 x 0.3 0.471
C 25% 1.6 x 0.25 0.40
D 15% 2.0 x 0.15 0. 30
Total 100% 1.711 = Better

INTERPRETATION: ________________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49


Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60% 2.115 x 0.60 1.269
Part – II SBM Practice 40% 1.711 x 0.40 0.684
Total 100% 1. 953 = Maturing

SBM LEVEL: II__

Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49


Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0
Certified Correct by the School Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Validated by Division Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM


SY: __________________

School:______________________________________ District:_______________________________
Division :_____________________________________ Date of Assessment/Validation:_____________

Part – I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 5% increase)
20156-2016 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout % of Decrease Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 7.06)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.);
2014-2015 (2% dec.)
2015-2016 2-average (at least 50% dec); (4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease
School Year Completion % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2015-2016 3-high (at least 10 increase)
Average Increase
School Year Cohort % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Surv. Rate (Baseline - 76%)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2015-2016 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR + CR + CSR / 3 =

C. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67% Sec. = 48%
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem.; 7%
2014-2015 Sec. increase)
2015-2016 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
Sec. increase)
3-high (at least 7% Elem.; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase

SUMMARY:
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45%
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
Total 100%
INTERPRETATION: ______________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment


Better: 1.5 – 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 – 3.0
Sample Score Sheet for Part-II
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Computation per Level
Average Rating
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating

SUMMARY:
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30% x 0.3
B 30% x 0.3
C 25% x 0.25
D 15% x 0.15
Total 100%

INTERPRETATION: ________________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49


Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60% x 0.60
Part – II SBM Practice 40% x 0.40
Total 100%

SBM LEVEL: _

Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49


Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0
Certified Correct by the School Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Validated by Division Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

You might also like