0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views2 pages

Exercise 4.1 (Diez)

The researcher investigated whether temperature had an effect on perceived running effort. Twelve runners ran for 30 minutes at 20°C, 25°C, and 30°C and rated their effort. A Friedman test found a significant effect of temperature on perceived effort (Xr2 = 14.2917, df = 2, p < 0.05). Therefore, temperature influences how hard running feels.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
63 views2 pages

Exercise 4.1 (Diez)

The researcher investigated whether temperature had an effect on perceived running effort. Twelve runners ran for 30 minutes at 20°C, 25°C, and 30°C and rated their effort. A Friedman test found a significant effect of temperature on perceived effort (Xr2 = 14.2917, df = 2, p < 0.05). Therefore, temperature influences how hard running feels.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EXERCISE 4.

1
FRIEDMAN TEST

Name: Diez, Dawn Ilish Nicole L. Date Submitted: June 24, 2021

Course & Section: 2 BSN B Subject: Applied Statistics

1. You are investigating whether temperature has an effect on the perceived effort felt during an
exercise session. Twelve runners were recruited to run on a treadmill for 30 minutes under three
temperature conditions: 20℃, 25℃ and 30℃, done in a random order over three different days. At the
end of each run, the runners were asked to record how hard the running session felt on a scale of 1 to
10, with 1 being easy and 10 extremely hard. Their results are shown on the table below. Perform a
Friedman test to determine if there are differences in perceived effort based on temperature, using 𝛼=
0.05.

20℃ R1 25℃ R2 30℃ R3


Runner 1 6 6 8
Runner 2 5 7 7
Runner 3 6 7 9
Runner 4 5 8 9
Runner 5 8 8 8
Runner 6 5 7 7
Runner 7 8 10 10
Runner 8 3 4 5
Runner 9 9 10 10
Runner 10 6 8 9
Runner 11 7 9 10
Runner 12 8 7 9

Solution.

1. State the Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Null hypothesis: H0: 𝜃1 = 𝜃2 = 𝜃3


There are no significant differences in perceived effort based on temperature.

Alternative hypothesis: H0: not all 𝜃i are equal.


There are significant differences in perceived effort based on temperature.

2. We now convert the interval data into rank-order scores for conditions 1-3, shown in the
following table. In the case of tied scores, the average rank is given.

20 ℃ R1 25 ℃ R2 30 ℃ R3
Runner 1 6 1.5 6 1.5 8 3
Runner 2 5 1 7 2.5 7 2.5
Runner 3 6 1 7 2 9 3
Runner 4 5 1 8 2 9 3
Runner 5 8 2 8 2 8 2
Runner 6 5 1 7 2.5 7 2.5
Runner 7 8 1 10 2.5 10 2.5
Runner 8 3 1 4 2 5 3
Runner 9 9 1 10 2.5 10 2.5
Runner 10 6 1 8 2 9 3
Runner 11 7 1 9 2 10 3
Runner 12 8 2 7 1 9 3
∑ 𝑅1 = 14.5 ∑ 𝑅2 = 24.5 ∑ 𝑅3 = 33
The sum of ranks for each condition is now computed, as follows.

Σ𝑅 14.5 Σ𝑅
24.5 Σ𝑅 33
1 2 3
𝑅 = = = 1.21; 𝑅 = = = 2.04; 𝑅 = = = 2.75
1 2 3
𝑛 12 𝑛 12 𝑛 12

3. Next, compute the Friedman test statistic, denoted by , where n is the sample size, and k
is the number of conditions.

This yields:
12 [14.52 + 24.52 + 332] − 3(12)(3 + 1)
𝑋2 =
𝑟 12(3)(3 + 1)

= (0.08333333333 × 1899.5) − 144

= 158.2916667 − 144

𝑋𝑟2 = 14.2917

4. To reject the null hypothesis, the computed must be greater than or equal to the tabled
critical chi-square value at the prescribed level of significance. The number of degrees of
freedom is given by:
𝑑𝑓 = 𝑘 − 1.

For df = 3 – 1 = 2, the tabled critical 𝛼 = 0.05 chi-squared value is 𝑋20.05 = 5.99.

5. Decision: Since 𝑋2 = 14.2917 > 𝑋 2 = 5.99, we reject the null hypothesis at α = 0.05
𝑟 0.05

6. Conclusion: At α = 0.05, the result is significant. Therefore, there are differences in perceived
effort based on temperature.

You might also like