Pediatric Optometry
Topics covered
Pediatric Optometry
Topics covered
Pacific University
CommonKnowledge
5-1998
Recommended Citation
Delplanche, Jacquelyn M., "A manual of pediatric optometry presented in English and French" (1998).
College of Optometry. 104.
https://commons.pacificu.edu/opt/104
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations and Capstone Projects at
CommonKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Optometry by an authorized administrator of
CommonKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected].
A manual of pediatric optometry presented in English and French
Abstract
This project consists of a manual of pediatric optometry presented in both English and French. This
manual originated as a course outline in Pediatric Optometry taught at l'University d'Optometrie. It was
written for both instructor and student to serve as a general outline for performing examinations on the
pediatric population. This manual was written with the assumption that the reader already knows how to
perform these optometric tests on the adult population, and is now interested in applying this knowledge
to the pediatric population of five years old and under. This manual addresses the additional questions
involved with a pediatric case history. It gives variations on entrance skills testing including age-
appropriate binocular tests. The examination section describes a wide range of visual acuity tests,
refraction and the ocular health check. Finally, flow charts address treatment suggestions for various
diagnoses. This manual is presented in both English and French to serve a multicultural population.
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science in Vision Science
Committee Chair
Willard Bleything
Subject Categories
Optometry
If you have downloaded this document directly from the web or from CommonKnowledge, see
the “Rights” section on the previous page for the terms of use.
If you have received this document through an interlibrary loan/document delivery service, the
following terms of use apply:
Copyright in this work is held by the author(s). You may download or print any portion of this
document for personal use only, or for any use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.).
Except for personal or fair use, you or your borrowing library may not reproduce, remix,
republish, post, transmit, or distribute this document, or any portion thereof, without the
permission of the copyright owner. [Note: If this document is licensed under a Creative
Commons license (see “Rights” on the previous page) which allows broader usage rights, your
use is governed by the terms of that license.]
Inquiries regarding further use of these materials should be addressed to: CommonKnowledge
Rights, Pacific University Library, 2043 College Way, Forest Grove, OR 97116, (503) 352-7209.
Email inquiries may be directed to:[email protected]
A Manual Of Pediatric Optometry
Presented In
English And French
PRESENTED BY:
May 1998
TTEE MEMBERS:
J
. r. · ·fllard Bleythjng
J
Pr6f.e · sor of Optometry
l iC~cd:C l if:nC:k'.,__,_;_,
Dr. . ta McClain
Coordinator, M.Ed.VFL Program
j ~~.;ClHG UN\VERSn~ .UBRAu~'
,·-1 q~,: ~T GROVE, OREGON
JJ ~ ~ ~~" U l -
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
This manual was written with the assumption that the reader already knows
how to perform these optometric tests on the adult population, and is now
old and under. This manual addresses the additional questions involved with
a wide range of visual acuity tests, refraction and the ocular health check.
multicultural population.
1
INTRODUCTION
This is a manual for a course in Pediatric Optometry. The idea to write this
manual came from my good friend Jean-Paul Roosen who is the Dean of
Optometry. This course was not a part of their normal curriculum. This
manual was written after the course was over to serve as a guideline for next
year's class. (I was unable to return to the school the following year.)
words down on paper in the form of this manual. As I wrote it in French first,
2
PEDIATRIC OPTOMETRY
CASE HISTORY
During this first part of the examination, ask the parents if they have noticed
any visual problems the child may have exhibited. Also, take a family
history. Inquire about the prenatal history, birth and the development of the
child.
Family History
- Are there any hereditary health problems in the family of both parents?
- Are there any hereditary visual problems in the family of both parents?
During Pregnancy
- Inquire about the age of the mother at the time of the birth.
During Delivery
3
- What was the duration of the labor?
- Have there been problems with multiple ear infections or other illnesses?
Visual Problems
- How does the demeanor of the child change when the eye is turned?
Strabismus, an eye that turns, is the most common reason for parents to
bring their baby to an Optometrist. However, the epicanthal fold can create
the illusion that an eye is crossing and parents may mistake this for an
4
ENTRANCE TESTS
Usually visual acuities are the first part of the examination after the history.
However, for babies, this is not the case. In attempting to cover an eye during
visual acuity testing the baby may very well cry, thereby making the rest of
I. TRACKING
-Perform the "H" test: move the toy slowly tracing an "H" in front of the
child.
During the test, it is normal for the infant to move her head. Therefore, it is
Perform the NPC on a baby the same as you would on an adult, using a small
toy or penlight instead. Starting at 16", slowly approach the baby's nose and
penlight the corneal reflex will be a good indicator of the deviating eye. There
5
are two thresholds with NPC: objective and subjective.l Threshold is recorded
as the distance between the fixation target and the patient. Subjective is
means the examiner observes an eye that deviates out at some point during
the test.
Try to test whether the infant will react visually to sound. Use a small bell in
the nine positions of gaze. Ring the bell and watch the baby turn her eyes to
find the bell. This test is also helpful in assessing r·ange of motilities.
Use a penlight or a small toy. With infants less than two years old, the cover
test may be challenging, as it is difficult to keep the baby fixated long enough
to perform the test. Generally, infants do not like to have their eyes covered
completely. With that in mind it is better to do cover test with your thumb
instead of an occluder. 3 As the baby is looking at the light, cover the right eye
watching for a movement of the left eye. Repeat the unilateral cover test with
6
the left eye as well. Next, alternately cover each eye watching for large
V. HIRSCHBERG
that it is shining centrally on the baby's face. Observe the corneal reflections
to see if they are equal and symmetrically positioned fairly close to the center
The Lang Stereotest 5 is a good test for infants because it is one of the only
Stereotest that does not require Polaroid glasses or redlgreen filters. Place
the card directly in front of the baby at 16 inches. If the baby has stereopsis
she will be able to recognize the cat, the star and the car and look at their
respective positions on the card. The examiner may even ask the baby to
touch each object. If the baby reaches for a target in the correct position, that
I
is a confirmed positive test. However, if the baby fails to reach for the targets,
1 you may watch for fixation of gaze on the target as well. To further verify if
1
7
indeed the baby has seen the objects, turn the card vertically. The baby
Figure 1
child sees a large fly that "floats" off the page she has at least gross
binocularity. Ask her to pinch the fly's wings. A child with the capacity for at
least gross stereopsis will grasp for the fly's wings about an inch from the
I book.s It is possible to repeat the test turning the book up side down. In this
I case the wings will appear to sink into the page and the child will push on
the page in an attempt to touch the wings. At 16 inches, the fly represents a
I disparity of 3,000 seconds of arc. As this test demands good motor control, a
8
fine ste1·eopsis as well: the animals and the circles are a good test for children
The Randot8 test resembles the Titmus test except that instead of a fly it
design, meaning that the target is not outlined. It has been reported that this
test design is more difficult for some individuals. 9 The shape is represented
on a random dot background. Ask the child to identify the shape seen and
Like the Lang Stereotest, the Frisby Test does not require any spectacle
filters. 10• 11 The Frisby TestJ 2 consists of three cards. Each card must be
divided into quarters. In each quarter there is a circular form which will not
be seen if binocular vision is not present. The stereo acuity will depend on the
thickness of the card and the distance at which the test is performed.
9
Testing Thickness of the Card
Distance
60 150 75 25
Seconds
70 110 55 20
80 85 40 15
Table 1
Begin the test with the 6-mm card at 40 em. Position the card to minimize
reflections on the card. Place a blank piece of white paper behind the card to
two cards, one that has the disparate circle in it and one that does not. Ask
Three positive responses are necessary for a successful test. If this occurs,
continue with the 3-mm card at 40 em. If this is again successful, test the
same card at 60 em. If the child is able to identify the circles continue on with
VISUAL FIELD
It is very difficult to test visual fieldS on children. You may need to use the
10
zone out of the peripheral vision of the child into the zone of potential
peripheral vision, the child will have a tendency to turn her eyes or head to
valid measurement.
If one is unable to find an object that will grab the child's interest when seen
in the periphery, use the movement of your fingers back and forth quickly.
When the child first sees the movement they will turn their eyes to see it.
fixation of the child straight-ahead during the test. At that moment present
EXAMINATION
VISUAL ACUITY
It is often very difficult to obtain a precise and consistent visual acuity with
acuity with both eyes first. Attempting to cover or patch an eye will often
11
upset the child and may lead to crying. Refer to the table below taken from
Preferential Looking.
method.
6 20/400 20/20
48 20/40
60 20/33
1. Newborn Babies
A. Preferential Looking
The clinical method of choice for evaluating visual acuity in babies is Forced
Choice Preferential Looking.15 One reliable example, the Teller Acuity Cards
has published normative values for use in the clinical setting. 16 • 17 Preferential
12
rectangular Teller Acuity Card is an imprint of a network of black lines on a
to a given visual acuity. The cards have a small hole in the center where an
observer can peer through to watch the infant's response. This test is
performed at 16 inches. Begin by presenting to the infant the card with the
watches to see on which side of the card the baby prefers to look. If the baby
looks at the lines, the Optometrist should turn the card and 1·epeat the trial.
As long as the infant is able to see the lines, a pendular movement of the
baby's eyes would be seen. Begin with the rotating drum about 15 inches
13
from the infant. When pendular movements of the infant's eyes are noticed,
the distance at which the pendular eye movements cease. Continue the test
using smaller and smaller stimuli until no pendular movements are seen.
The size of the stripe width combined with the furthest distance the response
was present is used to calculate the visual angle. This may then be converted
Figure 2
The Bock Candy Bead Test2 1 is appropriate for children as young as one year
old. Give the child a taste of the candy by guiding her hand to a bead and
allowing her to eat it. Start with the 1-mm stimulus in the palm of the
14
examiner's hand. If the child sees the bead she will be able to repeat the trial
successfully. Do the test with both eyes initially, and then continue by
visual acuity equivalent is only about 20/200. Other studies report that it is
responses. 22
The Ffooks Symbol Test23 is easier for children to comprehend than the
Snellen and Directional E tests. This test utilizes cards with figures of
To administer the test, show the three-year-old child a Ffooks card at the
standardized testing distance of 30 feet and ask her to name the picture.
If she correctly names the picture her Ffooks acuity is noted as 30/30.
If she does not respond verbally, give her one picture of each shape. Next,
ask her to choose the same picture that you are holding. If she still does
not respond, move closer to decrease the visual demand. However, in this
case one must recalculate the visual acuity based on the distance that the
15
card was last shown. If the child was able to identify the pictures at 15
feet, her Ffooks visual acuity is 15/30. This translates to a Snellen visual
acuity of 20/40.
~· l·
o. r
I
1
-- ~· ~-~
Figure 3
The Allen Picture Card Test 24 consists of seven pictures of the familiar
objects shown on the previous page. This test closely resembles the Ffooks
16
C. New York Lighthouse Flashcard Test
Figure 4
Originally, this test was designed for children with low vision. 25. 26 It is
easier than the Allen Picture Card Test. Administration of this test is also
the same as the Ffooks Test except that the New York Lighthouse
Figure 5
17
The Sjogren Hand Test27 is similar to the more familiar Tumbling E Test
except that it uses a picture of a hand instead of an E. The child need only
to copy the direction that the fingers of the hand are pointing (for
example: up, down, left or right). The main problem with this test is that
the palm of the hand is larger and helps the patient identify the direction
B. Tumbling E Test
This is the most commonly used test for preschool children. 2s The letter E
To begin the test, give the child a card with an E printed on it, or even
better a plastic E. Ask the child to hold it the same way as the shown on
the test chart. Continue to present smaller E's in varying positions until
18
presentations of the E. If this is the case, an inaccurate result may occur
C. Landolt C Test
E the letter C is used. The Landolt C Test is more difficult for children to
~
~
Figure 6
The Broken Wheel Acuity Test consists of seven pairs of 5x7-inch cards.
Each card has a picture of a car. In each pair of cards, one car has "broken
wheels" as shown above. Both cards are presented to the child at 10 feet.
If the child chooses the ''broken wheel" card four times in a row, continue
the trial by presenting another pair of cards with a smaller stimuli. so The
19
REFRACTION
that of an adult. The technique varies depending on the age of the child.
Between the ages of 0 and 2 years it is very difficult to obtain a visual acuity.
that infants, born full term and in good health are usually hyperopic. Banks 31
any amount between plano and +3.00 diopters would be considered in the
normal range. Banks also noted that an infant weighing less than 5.5 pounds
very likely that these infants will become myopic. Howland observed that
Between the ages of two and five it is possible to obtain a more reliable visual
report that a child of this age would still present as a low hyperope,
20
Mter five years of age, cooperation on the part of the child is generally
If a child is myopic between ages five and six, the myopia is most likely
ages of five and six, it is likely that she will remain hyperopic at least
If a child is refracted between + 1.25 and +0.50 at the ages of five and
j
I six, the chances are very good that she will become an emmetrope at
I
the age of 13-14.
I
I If a child is refracted between plano and +0.50 diopters at the ages of
!II five and six, there is a great chance that she will become myopic by the
by about age two. At this age, the child has been introduced to an
21
esotropia is manifested.36 .In this case the optometrist should perform a
attempt to establish clarity and binocular alignment both far and near.
Vision therapy may also be introduced as soon as the child is old enough
to cooperate.
The classical school of thought favors full plus power and continues to
monitor the child for any increase in plus.s7 However, the theory of
the hyperopic child seeks less hyperopia over time the final prescription
22
A. Keratometry
Figure 7
held, though less accurate, thus the patient does not need to maintain the
posture required by the instrument. This is ideal when testing the infant
population.
23
B. Retinoscopy
enlist the aid of the mother, another child or some other person who is
able to attract the child's attention far away with a large toy or puppet.
to give the patient an interesting fixation target that is large enough for
her to see easily. This target should be something that she can easily
recognize and name. It is ideal if the examiner is able to ask the child
simple questions about the target to insure fixation. The target should be
at 20 feet.
Figure 8
24
The purpose of :MEM is to discover whether the accommodative response is
The fixation target is a white card with a hole in the center. Around the hole
are letters, or symbols, depending on the age of the patient. This card is
attached to the front of the retinoscope. Position the child, as they would be
sitting during a near task. The child should be wearing their habitual
glasses. The examiner should be slightly lower than the patient's normal
downward gaze. Ask the child to call out the letters/symbols around the hole.
At this time the examiner, shining the retinoscope beam through the hole,
"against" motion seen from the reflex. The examiner then estimates the other
eye. Choose the lens that would neutralize each estimation. Quickly place
that respective lens before the child's eye and check for a neutral response.
accommodation.
25
than+ 1.00 diopter. However, it is important to rule out latent hyperopia as
I. PUPILS
The pupils of a neonate are normally small, equally round and reactive to
direct and indirect light. Slight variation in the size of the two pupils may be
should not be less than 2-mm. Pupillary dilation should not be greater than
5-mm.
Shine the transilluminator at the pupil of the right eye and observe the
direct reflex of the right eye. Repeat this three times observing the
consensual reflex of the left eye as well. Repeat the same procedure with the
left eye.
2. DIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY
procedure allows the examiner to observe the interior structures of the eyes.
To examine the right eye of the patient, the examiner should use her right
26
eye and right hand. To observe the left eye of the patient, the examiner
mother hold the baby over her shoulder. In this case the examiner should
position herself behind the mother. The infant may be more relaxed with a
bottle.
It is best to avoid touching the baby's face. Enlist the help of an assistant to
capture the infant's attention across the room. Do not hesitate to use age
zero, use the white filter at the smallest aperture setting. Compare the red
reflexes of the eyes. Approach the baby slowly at a slightly oblique angle (15
degrees) shining the light into the pupil. Ophthalmoscopy is very difficult to
perform on infants. Frequently infants may not want to cooperate with this
test. It is sufficient to note that the media is clear and the reflexes are red.
27
3. INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE (lOP)
The Goldman45 and Perkins methods of measuring lOP are very precise. One
other method is nearly as precise: the Ton open. 46 The advantage of the
tonometers are becoming more reliable for pressures less than 30 mmHg and
lOP is very difficult to obtain with infants. Another method that is easier for
infants is the KEELER pulse-air. This portable tonometer does not touch the
eye of the baby. Finally, if one is still unable to obtain an lOP with these
close his eyes. Gently feel the eyes to check that they are not too firm and
TREATMENT
It is important to clearly express to the patient (and their parents) the goal of
the clinical experience and philosophy of the vision care professional rather
28
than the research. The most important questions to ask are why, when and
The following pages are the recommendations for the treatment of refractive
29
THE TREATMENT OF MYOPIA
Ciirrec:
•d D, Correct at
>3D ar 1 year
n.o P.X any age
>1 0 at 3 years
..
i T
Amblyopia. Evaluate
nor a and treat
concern ;amblyopia
~
'
· Exo : :VII RX
Esc : consider
undercouecting
I
·C-iJ'I re<no'l'Q
3 1ne<ar
~
Full- orne
W'f!¥
l
Presc.-ibe Consieer
glasses CQOt3C[
un~l olC~r lenses
T
,.I
ln•rial
follow-up
at 1 month
I
T
Amblyopia or
Normal VA an<:
decreased
binoCJ\.a rit·t
binoa.:lari:y
30
THE TREAT!'vJENT OF HYPEROPIA
Minimal el1ect
cn behavior or
Observe
interest and
G .
Correc: ii
st.able
accommodation , per1orrnance
with near
activi;ies
Amblyopia Evalua:e
Nota and treat
con~ rn amblyo;:>ia
Sinoeulat
dydu~
Es.o: full RX
Exo: consiee--
undercorrecting
N gf\X;
FuU-time
(".On:inu~ to
wear
mQoitor
<5 D. prescribe
>5 D . consiC<;r
!;lasses only
=ntacl lenses
until older
IO. ItJUl
lollcw-u;>
at 1 rncn:..-.
.~ -- ··
Ar.er
l 1r.iii~l
exam. ev.Jll;L!:e
Ii
Normal VA af1C
binocul:>ri:y
I
Ar.>!:llyop<a o r
cecrease-c
binoOJ iar ny
I
..
.~: 2·· 3 )"t...' i.H:.i I Re -e valur..:e-
o: a~e one ~; ~.; b.ascc cr.
:rt?a:;s. ol a-;c ..J ch :J~·s a~~
31
THE TREATMENT OF ASTIGMATISM
prescribing
b<~sed on
c:-.ild" s a,;e
I
...
Amblyo;:>;'! .
no ~ a
~nc.ern·
<5o : >5o.
presc:-ibe consicer
slasses contact
until oleer lenses
1
FuH-tirne
wear. initial
1 oHow~p al
1 n1an[.'l
r__ _L _i
I "ocr,-..;1 v;.. I Ar.-.=:·.' op ia
AI:er "";;'-' I
y
am. ev<lh..;a:e
[
1 2-3 yo:us
old and ar 5
r··· E·-w:~.;:e I
year s o :d L_::_~·~---·-· --~
32
THE TREATMENT OF ANISOMETROPIA
l
l
>l 0.
...
I <1
- - - ~---- - ~
0
I consider
=rrec1~
L
...--H-y-p;;op4~]
1-tyop4c or or
:an;imetropic
:astigmatic ,
r-
~
Younger th~n Older than
[ _ ' "" o• 4 years of ao;e 4 ye:ars. of .:11:;e
- T=-- =--
Moni10r and
evaluale
rifle -motor
coorCination
EvaiUdte
and uea t
amblyop<a and
binoc.luac
dysfunction
T
r .----__!+__--.
<50. >5 D.
prescr it.e consider
glasses contact
until older lenses
--~
'L--------~--------~ I
~--- ·
WI?Ut' . ir.i-:..:31
lollo·-·u::: .>1
1 mcnl"l
.
Amblyopi;, or
Normal VA and
c'e<rea~C'C
binocuf.;;11:y
------1
Af:t;"r in~:Jal
exam. ev~_dua:e
b.noculan!y
C
Ol 2-.J ·,e;Jn,
old unc:' .Jl ~
Eva lua :e 'e·evalu;:~:J
b..3~'-~ en
yea :1y
__?'~:! ' \ o ld cholc! "s a o;e
- -- -
33
REFERENCES
1994; 65(9):639.
99:446-452.
34
10.Hatch SW, Richman JE. Stereopsis testing without polaroid glasses: a
1994; 65(9):638.
11.Manny RE, Martinez AT, Fern KD. Testing stereopsis in the preschool
28:223-1.
17(12): 1151.
15. Ciner EB. Examination procedures for infants and young children. J
16.Salomao SR, Ventura DF. Large sample population age norms for visual
17.Mayer DL, Beiser AS, Warner AF, Pratt EM, Raye KN, Lang JM.
Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between one month
35
18. Goldmann H. Objektive sehscharfenbestimming. Ophthalmologica 1943;
105:240.
Publishing, 1989.
21. Bock RH. Amblyopia detection in the practice of pediatrics. Arch Pediatr
1960; 17:335.
22.Richman JE, Garzia RP. The bead test: a critical appraisal. Am J Optom
44(1):38.
25.A flash card vision test for children. New York: Low Vision Lens Service,
26.Faye EE. A new visual acuity test for partially sighted non-readers. J Ped
27. Sjogren H. A new series of test cards for determining visual acuity in
28. Hatfield EM. Methods and standards for screening preschool children.
36
I I
30.Richman JE, Petito GT, Cron MT. Broken wheel acuity test: a new and
valid test for preschool and exceptional children. JAm Optom Assoc 1984;
55(8):561-65.
36.Fitzgerald DE, Grunning CF. Vision Therapy for a preschool child with
1974;58:240-246.
37
40.Krumholtz I. Optometric examination & management of the infant-the
privately, 1958.
46. Ciner EB. Examination procedures for infants and young childl·en. J
38
j
OPTOMETR!E PEDIATRIOUE
HISTOIRE DE CAS
D~roulement de Ia grossesse
- aoe de la m~re ~ Ia naissance
uti I isation de medicaments par la m~re
-exposition de Ia mere a des radiations
Deroulement de ] / accouchement
- ! / enfan t ~tait pr~matur~?
un probl~me d / oxyg~ne pendant ] / accouchement?
une c~sarienne?
Je medcin uti 1 ise des forceps?
la duree de ] ' accouchement?
Croissance de ! ·· enfant
combien ! ' enfant pesait-il ~ Ia naissance?
- le d~ v eloppement est normal?
aucun maiadies ou infections g~n~ral?
]'enfant a des allergies?
-des biessures a I 'oeil ou ~ Ia tete?
ETAT BINOCULAIRE
I MOTRICITE
IV LE I'1ASQUAGE
V LE TEST DE HIRSCHBERG
STAR
Di ~ parit y : 600"
CAT CAR
Disparity : 1200·· 'i:ri s parity : 550"
•:•.' i" .. . • .,
em 6mm 3mm 1 mm
Pendu lorb
Age Tumblin~· e)'e
(rn o nth s ) E m ovements OKN< f'L ~ VEP·
·Slatapcr.
~_ S c hwarting.
·Suknl; M ~ q~ ; H a rlcr .
Echell es d c :
--
Ouverture angulaire
SN ELLEN MONOYER en minutes d ' arc
- ----- - -- -- -~ --- ·.
Picd s l\1ctres
10/ 10 (
20/ 20 616
20125 617 .9 - 1,2 5
20/ 30 6/ 9 8/ 10 1,50
20/40 6/12 5/10 2
20/50 6/ 15 4/ 10 2,50
20/60 6/ 18 0,3~ 3
20170 (, /2 1 0.29 3.50
20/ RII 6124 0.25 4
20 / 911 6/27 4,50
20/ 100 6/J O 2/ 10 5
20/200 6/61) 1/ 10 10
20/ 400 6/ 120 1120 20
------- - -- - - - - -·-··- ··- ·-··-- ___ . ---·-·-
-
1. Pour les nouveaux-n~s
A. Regard Preferential:
VUE DE DESSUS
-------'-~-·_ _ _ _ OPTOI•JETRISTE
/ --~\
I CQ\ _________ L " ENFANT
A ~ LE PARENT
L----------------------~
i ! ............
I /
1--ig 3.24 The opr()hnetic drum .
2. Enfant de 3 ans
A. Test De Ffooks
A. Main De SJogren
B. E Directionnel
C. C De Landolt
Simi laire au E directionnel. La partie ouverte du
cercle est montree dans Jes quatres directions. Par rapport
au E directionnel. le C de Landolt est plus diffici Je a
comprendre pour ! ' enfant et ses resultats sont similaires
aux E directionnels.
LA REFRACTION DE L'ENFANT
Les techniques d ' examen de Ia refraction et leur
correction chez l'enfant different de eel les adultes. et
dependent surtout de ! ' age de !'enfant.
A. Keratoscope
FIGUI!E 5 2. Th e p lacido
di ~ c
._
B. Keratometrie
fiG Uil f. S.) . Th e kcral o·
scope
-·
B.I
I
FIL /" 1:1 -, I \ I !: \ 1 •··li n " ' ' •q n
- ------------------------------
Cette skiascopie. ne pourra etre effectuee que chez les
enfants cooperatifs et attentifs. On recherche ici a savoir
si Ia reponse accommodative est ega! au stimulus
accomrnodatif. Le but est done d'observer Ia reponse
accomrnodatif spontanee de )·'enfant a une cible presentee a
sa distance habituelle de travail.
A. PUPILLES
B. L OPTHALMOSCOPIE DIRECT
E +
~
>50
<1 0, coo~• ~
>3 0 at 1 ye<Jr
Cocrect at
no RX .• any age
> 1 0 at 3 years
L
Amblyo pia. Evaluate
nota and treat
concern amblyopia
~ i
~
Exo : :ull RX
Eso: c:::nsid€ r
undercorrecting
~
Presc:-ibe Consid€r
glasses contact
until olcer lenses
"T
' -·
Initial
follow-up
at 1 month
I
T
Amb lyopia cr
Normal VA ane
decreased
binoCJlarity
binoo;l;:;rity
Mter rniual
eY::;n_ eval uat e Re-evalua:e
Evalu :J:e
a! 2-..3 years based en
ye a.r1y
and at 5 years c~11id·s a<;e
LE TRAITEMENT DE L' HYPERMETROPIE
c
f
mblyopia Evalu:a:e
Nota -, and tre at
conce rn :amhlyo;Jia
t {
No }--- Binocular
bi·nocul:ar
dysfuncion
cy ~;[unc:i on
~
Esc: lull RX
Exo: c:ons~er
undercorrecting
i
No RX:
FuU -time
co ntinue to
wear
monitor
i
I. l
<5 D. p<"escribe
>50 consid-?r
~lasses only
contact lenses
until older
I 1
-~
Initia l
lollow-u;:::
at 1 men~':
I
..-- - - i l
Ar<1~lyopia or
N orm al VA and
ceoeas ee
bin ocula ri:y
binoOJ I:arirv
At:er 1niti<J I ~-
e ~ a rn. e v;;lu a :e T
at 2 - J )' ~ d rS Re -evalua:e
E:valu a :e
o f ;;;~c vn d J ~ S b.osc c en
year:] [
ve 3' S ol a;:c ch :lc·s ac e
l LE TRAITEMENT DE L'ASTIGMATISME
r I
S;;;!:J!€ over
Uns;a~l e
3 visits
---
~
..-
C onsider
prescribing
b.; sed on
6ilos a<;e
1
! ll
YOl.:r.s;er than Oder than age
c.;e 1 year. 1 year. obsefVe
!\;;1c:ion net interest and
a CJncern performance
!
Ar.~blyopi<j
at near
T
Amblyopia
I
Mo n it or nota evaluate
ccncern and treat
~
l_
c r l.
<5 0 . >5o.
presc: ibe ccnsicer
<_;la sses contact
until oleer lenses
I I
·~
Full -time
wear. initial
follow-up at
1 m o nL'1
~
I !
~l o r~ a l VA Ar.::::lfopia
A f:er ini :i;;l
exam. e va lu a:e ,.I
a t 2 -..J y ears Re-evaluate
old and at 5
t.a sed on
yc:Jr s ofd ch ilc ·s ac.;e
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
AI I ieri-Thepenier. O.D.
"
I