Philippine Competition Act Codal Analysis
Philippine Competition Act Codal Analysis
CODAL ANALYSIS OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10667 KNOWN AS THE PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
CHAPTER I 1. Introduction The Philippine Competition Act (Republic Act 10667 or https://
GENERAL PROVISIONS the “Act”) defines, prohibits and penalizes three types of anti- www.phcc.g
competitive conduct: anti-competitive agreements, abuse of ov.ph/
Section 1. Short Title. – This Act shall be known as the dominant position, and anti-competitive mergers and philippine-
competition-
"Philippine Competition Act". acquisitions. It also creates the Philippine Competition
law-r-10667/
Commission (“PCC”), which will have the original and primary
authority to conduct inquiries or investigations and to hear and
decide cases involving violations of the Act. The Act seeks to
Section 2. Declaration of Policy. – The efficiency of market (i) enhance economic efficiency and promote free and fair
competition as a mechanism for allocating goods and services is a competition in trade, industry and all commercial activities; (ii)
generally accepted precept. The State recognizes that past prevent economic concentration that will control production,
measures undertaken to liberalize key sectors in the economy distribution or trade, which will unduly stifle competition or
need to be reinforced by measures that safeguard competitive lessen, manipulate or construct the discipline of free markets;
conditions. The State also recognizes that the provision of equal and (iii) penalize all forms of anti-competitive conduct with the
opportunities to all promotes entrepreneurial spirit, encourages object of protecting consumer welfare and advancing domestic
private investments, facilitates technology development and and international trade and economic development.
transfer and enhances resource productivity. Unencumbered
market competition also serves the interest of consumers by
allowing them to exercise their right of choice over goods and
services offered in the market.
Page 1 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 2 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Section 4. Definition of Terms. – As used in this Act: industry and commerce in the Philippines. The Act also applies
to international trade having direct, substantial, and reasonably
(a) Acquisition refers to the purchase of securities or assets, foreseeable effects in the Philippine trade industry or
through contract or other means, for the purpose of obtaining commerce, including those resulting from acts done outside of
control by: the Philippines. The Act, however, excludes combinations or
activities of workers or employees as well as agreements or
(1) One (1) entity of the whole or part of another; arrangements with employers when designed solely to facilitate
collective bargaining in respect of conditions of employment.
(2) Two (2) or more entities over another; or
(3) One (1) or more entities over one (1) or more entities;
Page 3 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 4 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
CHAPTER II
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION COMMISSION
Page 5 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
The Chairperson and the Commissioners who shall have the rank
equivalent of cabinet secretary and undersecretary, respectively,
shall be appointed by the President.
Page 6 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 7 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 8 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 9 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 10 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
CHAPTER III
PROHIBITED ACTS
Page 11 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(b) The following agreements, between or among competitors As the Philippines’ antitrust authority, the PCC is mandated to
which have the object or effect of substantially preventing, exercise the following powers and functions, among others:
restricting or lessening competition shall be prohibited:
(a) Conduct inquiry, investigate, and hear and decide on cases
(1) Setting, Kmiting, or controlling production, markets, technical involving any violation of this Act and other existing
development, or investment; competition laws:
(2) Dividing or sharing the market, whether by volume of sales or a. motu proprio
purchases, territory, type of goods or services, buyers or sellers or b. upon receipt of a verified complaint from an interested
any other means; party
c. upon referral by the concerned regulatory agency, and
(c) Agreements other than those specified in (a) and (b) of this institute the appropriate civil or criminal proceedings;
section which have the object or effect of substantially
preventing, restricting or lessening competition shall also be (b) Review proposed mergers and acquisitions, determine
prohibited: Provided, Those which contribute to improving the thresholds for notification, determine the requirements and
production or distribution of goods and services or to promoting procedures for notification, and upon exercise of its powers to
technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair review, prohibit mergers and acquisitions that will substantially
share of the resulting benefits, may not necessarily be deemed a prevent, restrict, or lessen competition in the relevant market;
violation of this Act.
(c) Monitor and undertake consultation with stakeholders and
An entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common affected agencies for the purpose of understanding market
control with another entity or entities, have common economic behavior;
interests, and are not otherwise able to decide or act
independently of each other, shall not be considered competitors (d) Upon finding, based on substantial evidence, that an entity
for purposes of this section. has entered into an anti-competitive agreement or has abused its
dominant position after due notice and hearing, stop or redress
the same, by applying remedies, such as, but not limited to,
issuance of injunctions, requirement of divestment, and
disgorgement of excess profits under such reasonable
parameters that shall be prescribed by the rules and regulations
implementing this Act;
Page 12 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 13 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
enterprise;
Page 14 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 15 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 16 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
PRICE FIXING
The Commission found that between 1996 and 1999 at least, the
four brewers held numerous unofficial meetings, during which
they coordinated prices and price increases of beer in the
Netherlands. Evidence adduced, including handwritten notes,
confirmed the dates and places of these unofficial meetings. The
companies were determined to have coordinated prices for both
“on-trade” (consumption on the premises, such as bars and
Section 15. Abuse of Dominant Position. – It shall be prohibited pubs) and “off-trade” (sale through supermarkets and the like)
for one or more entities to abuse their dominant position by segments of the beer market in the Netherlands. They also
engaging in conduct that would substantially prevent, restrict or coordinated occasionally on non-pricing aspects, such as
lessen competition: conditions offered to individual customers in the on-trade
segment. The Commission further found evidence that the
Page 17 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(a) Selling goods or services below cost with the object of driving brewers were aware that their actions were illegal, as they tried
competition out of the relevant market: Provided, That in the to conceal their activity through the use of code names and
Commission’s evaluation of this fact, it shall consider whether the hotels/restaurants as venues for their meetings.
entity or entities have no such object and the price established
was in good faith to meet or compete with the lower price of a
competitor in the same market selling the same or comparable
product or service of like quality;
(2) Price differential which reasonably or approximately reflect Not per se violations are other anti-competitive agreements
differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting prohibited by the law which have the object or effect of
from differing methods, technical conditions, or quantities in substantially preventing, restricting, or lessening competition.
which the goods or services are sold or delivered to the buyers or Since these agreements are not per se illegal, the PCC needs to
sellers; conduct inquiries to determine whether they restrict competition
and violate the PCA.
(3) Price differential or terms of sale offered in response to the
Page 18 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(f) Making supply of particular goods or services dependent upon Market sharing is a collusive agreement by two or more
the purchase of other goods or services from the supplier which competitors which divides or allocates the market. Market
have no direct connection with the main goods or services to be sharing not only includes territories, but also customers, volume
supplied; of sales or purchases, and type of goods or services, among
other considerations.
(g) Directly or indirectly imposing unfairly low purchase prices
for the goods or services of, among others, marginalized
agricultural producers, fisherfolk, micro-, small-, medium-scale
enterprises, and other marginalized service providers and
producers;
Page 19 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
provided that prices that develop in the market as a result of or OF ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS?
due to a superior product or process, business acumen or legal
rights or laws shall not be considered unfair prices; and Agreements not falling under Section 14(a) and 14(b) of the
PCA that have an anti-competitive object or effect, but
(i) Limiting production, markets or technical development to the nevertheless contribute to improving production or distribution
prejudice of consumers, provided that limitations that develop in of goods or services within the relevant market, or promoting
the market as a result of or due to a superior product or process, technical and economic progress while allowing consumers a
business acumen or legal rights or laws shall not be a violation of fair share of the resulting benefit may not necessarily be
this Act: considered anti-competitive. (Note: This only applies to Section
14 (c) of the PCA).
Provided, That nothing in this Act shall be construed or
interpreted as a prohibition on having a dominant position in a
relevant market or on acquiring, maintaining and increasing
market share through legitimate means that do not substantially
prevent, restrict or lessen competition:
Page 20 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(a) There is power over more than one half (1/2) of the voting
rights by virtue of an agreement with investors;
(b) There is power to direct or govern the financial and
operating policies of the entity under a statute or agreement;
(c) There is power to appoint or remove the majority of the
members of the board of directors or equivalent governing
body;
(d) There is power to cast the majority votes at meetings of the
board of directors or equivalent governing body;
(e) There exists ownership over or the right to use all or a
significant part of the assets of the entity;
(f) There exist rights or contracts which confer decisive
influence on the decisions of the entity
Page 21 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 22 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
An agreement consummated in violation of this requirement to Access to capital markets or financial resources;
notify the Commission shall be considered void and subject the Economies of scale and scope;
parties to an administrative fine of one percent (1%) to five Vertical integration; and
percent (5%) of the value of the transaction. Existence of a highly developed distribution and sales
network.
Should the Commission deem it necessary, it may request further
information that are reasonably necessary and directly relevant to
the prohibition under Section 20 hereof from the parties to the
agreement before the expiration of the thirty (30)-day period WHEN CAN A BUSINESS BE HELD LIABLE FOR
referred. The issuance of such a request has the effect of ABUSING ITS MARKET DOMINANCE?
extending the period within which the agreement may not be
consummated for an additional sixty (60) days, beginning on the The PCA prohibits entities from abusing their dominant position
day after the request for information is received by the in the relevant market by engaging in conduct that would
parties: Provided, That, in no case shall the total period for substantially prevent, restrict, or lessen competition.
review by the Commission of the subject agreement exceed
ninety (90) days from initial notification by the parties. Examples of conduct constituting abuse of dominant position:
When the above periods have expired and no decision has been Selling goods or services below cost to drive
promulgated for whatever reason, the merger or acquisition shall competition out of the market;
be deemed approved and the parties may proceed to implement or Imposing barriers to entry or committing acts that
consummate it. All notices, documents and information provided prevent competitors from growing within the market;
to or emanating from the Commission under this section shall be Making a transaction subject to acceptance by other
subject to confidentiality rule under Section 34 of this Act except parties who have no connection to the transaction;
when the release of information contained therein is with the Setting prices or other terms or conditions that
consent of the notifying entity or is mandatorily required to be discriminate unreasonably between customers or sellers
disclosed by law or by a valid order of a court of competent of the same goods or services;
jurisdiction, or of a government or regulatory agency, including Imposing restrictions on the lease or contract for sale or
an exchange. trade of goods or services concerning where, to whom,
or in what form a good or service may be sold or traded;
In the case of the merger or acquisition of banks, banking Making supply of particular goods or services dependent
institutions, building and loan associations, trust companies, upon the purchase of other goods or services from the
insurance companies, public utilities, educational institutions and supplier;
other special corporations governed by special laws, a favorable Imposing unfairly low purchase prices for the goods or
or no-objection ruling by the Commission shall not be construed services of marginalized service providers and
as dispensing of the requirement for a favorable recommendation producers, such as farmers, fisherfolk, and micro, small,
Page 23 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
by the appropriate government agency under Section 79 of the and medium enterprises (MSMEs);
Corporation Code of the Philippines. Imposing unfair purchase or selling price on
competitors, customers, suppliers or consumers; and
A favorable recommendation by a governmental agency with a Limiting production, markets or technical development
competition mandate shall give rise to a disputable presumption to the prejudice of consumers.
that the proposed merger or acquisition is not violative of this
Act.
(a) Prohibit the implementation of the agreement; Anti-Competitive Mergers and Acquisitions. These refer to those
mergers and acquisitions that substantially prevent, restrict or lessen
(b) Prohibit the implementation of the agreement unless and until competition. By way of exception, the PCC may exempt mergers and
it is modified by changes specified by the Commission. acquisitions if the parties are able to prove that (i) the concentration
has brought about or is likely to bring about gains in efficiencies that
are greater than the effect of any limitation on competition that result
(c) Prohibit the implementation of the agreement unless and until or likely to result from the merger or acquisition; or (ii) a party thereto
the pertinent party or parties enter into legally enforceable is faced with actual or imminent financial failure and the agreement
agreements specified by the Commission. represents the least anti-competitive alternative among the known
alternative uses for the failing entity’s assets. Further, under the Act,
Section 19. Notification Threshold. – The Commission shall, parties to mergers or acquisitions, the transaction value of which
from time to time, adopt and publish regulations stipulating: exceeds Php1 Billion are prohibited from consummating the same
until thirty (30) days after the PCC has been notified thereof in the
(a) The transaction value threshold and such other criteria subject form and containing the information specified in the regulations to be
to the notification requirement of Section 17 of this Act; issued by the PCC. Failure to comply with such notification
requirement renders the merger or acquisition void and the parties
thereto liable to pay an administrative fine equivalent to 1%-5% of the
(b) The information that must be supplied for notified merger or
transaction value.
acquisition;
Page 24 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 25 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Section 23. Finality of Ridings on Mergers and Acquisitions. The acquiring and acquired parties to the notifiable
– Merger or acquisition agreements that have received a favorable M&A and their ultimate parent entities.
ruling from the Commission, except when such ruling was In the formation of a joint venture (other than in
obtained on the basis of fraud or false material information, may connection with a merger or consolidation), the
not be challenged under this Act. contributing entities shall be deemed acquiring entities,
and the joint venture shall be deemed the acquired entity.
Page 26 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
CHAPTER V
DISPOSITION OF CASES
voting power of an entity, unless in exceptional circumstances, it represents the least anti-competitive arrangement among the
can clearly be demonstrated that such ownership does not known alternative uses of its assets.
constitute control. Control also exists even when an entity owns
one half (1/2) or less of the voting power of another entity when:
(a) There is power over more than one half (1/2) of the voting
rights by virtue of an agreement with investors;
Page 28 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(c) The existence and power of its competitors; The following factors help determine the relevant market:
(d) The possibility of access by its competitors or other entities to Possibilities of substituting goods and services with
its sources of inputs; other domestic or foreign products, considering
technological possibilities, availability of substitute
(e) The power of its customers to switch to other goods or products to consumers, and the time required for such
services; substitution;
Cost of distribution of goods and services, along with its
(f) Its recent conducts; and raw materials, and supplements and substitutes from
other areas and abroad, considering freight, insurance,
(g) Other criteria established by the regulations of this Act. import duties, and non-tariff restrictions; the restrictions
imposed by economic agents or by their associations;
There shall be a rebuttable presumption of market dominant and the time required to supply the market from those
position if the market share of an entity in the relevant market is areas;
at least fifty percent (50%), unless a new market share threshold Cost and probability of users or consumers seeking other
is determined by the Commission for that particular sector. markets; and
National, local or international restrictions which limit
The Commission shall from time to time determine and publish the access by users or consumers to alternate suppliers,
the threshold for dominant position or minimum level of share in or the access by suppliers to alternate consumers.
the relevant market that could give rise to a presumption of
dominant position. In such determination, the Commission would
consider the structure of the relevant market, degree of
integration, access to end-users, technology and financial
resources, and other factors affecting the control of a market, as
provided in subsections (a) to (g) of this section.
Page 30 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
applying the provisions of this Act, for a limited time, in whole or HOW DOES THE PCC DETERMINE IF A BUSINESS
in part, in all or specific cases, on an entity or group of entities, if CONDUCT IS ANTI-COMPETITIVE?
in its determination:
In determining whether an anti-competitive agreement or
(a) Enforcement is not necessary to the attainment of the policy conduct exists or has been committed, the PCC shall:
objectives of this Act;
Define the relevant market allegedly affected by the anti-
(b) Forbearance will neither impede competition in the market competitive agreement or conduct, following the
where the entity or group of entities seeking exemption operates principles laid out in Section 24 of the PCA;
nor in related markets; and Determine if there is actual or potential adverse impact
on competition in the relevant market caused by the
(c) Forbearance is consistent with public interest and the benefit alleged agreement or conduct, and if such impact is
and welfare of the consumers. substantial and outweighs the actual or potential
efficiency gains that result from the agreement or
A public hearing shall be held to assist the Commission in conduct;
making this determination. Adopt a broad and forward-looking perspective,
recognizing future market developments, any overriding
The Commission’s order exempting the relevant entity or group need to make the goods or services available to
of entities under this section shall be made public. Conditions consumers, the requirements of large investments in
may be attached to the forbearance if the Commission deems it infrastructure, the requirements of law, and the need of
appropriate to ensure the long-term interest of consumers. the Philippine economy to respond to international
competition, but also taking account of past behavior of
In the event that the basis for the issuance of the exemption order the parties involved and prevailing market conditions;
ceases to be valid, the order may be withdrawn by the Balance the need to ensure that competition is not
Commission. prevented or substantially restricted and the risk that
competition efficiency, productivity, innovation, or
CHAPTER VI development of priority areas or industries in the general
FINES AND PENALTIES interest of the country may be deterred by overzealous or
undue intervention; and
Section 29. Administrative Penalties. – Assess the totality of evidence on whether it is more
likely than not that the entity has engaged in an anti-
(a) Administrative Fines. – In any investigation under Chapter III, competitive agreement or conduct, including whether the
Sections 14 and 15, and Chapter IV, Sections 17 and 20 of this entity’s conduct was done with a reasonable commercial
Act, after due notice and hearing, the Commission may impose purpose such as but not limited to phasing out of a
the following schedule of administrative fines on any entity found product or closure of a business, or as a reasonable
Page 31 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
to have violated the said sections: commercial response to the market entry or conduct of a
competitor.
First offense: Fine of up to one hundred million pesos
(P100,000,000.00);
Second offense: Fine of not less than one hundred million pesos
(P100,000,000.00) but not more than two hundred fifty million
pesos (P250,000,000.00).
Page 32 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
When the entities involved are juridical persons, the penalty of.
imprisonment shall be imposed on its officers, directors, or
employees holding managerial positions, who are knowingly and
willfully responsible for such violation.
CHAPTER VII
ENFORCEMENT
Page 33 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 34 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 35 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(a) At the time the entity comes forward, the Commission has not
received information about the activity from any other source;
(d) The entity did not coerce another party to participate in the
activity and clearly was not the leader in, or the originator of, the
activity.
Page 36 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(1) The entity is the first to come forward and qualify for
leniency;
(2) At the time the entity comes forward, the Commission does
not have evidence against the entity that is likely to result in a
sustainable conviction; and
Such program shall include the immunity from any suit or charge
of affected parties and third parties, exemption, waiver, or
gradation of fines and/or penalties giving precedence to the entity
submitting such evidence. An entity cooperating or furnishing
information, document or data to the Commission in connection
to an investigation being conducted shall not be subjected to any
form of reprisal or discrimination. Such reprisal or discrimination
shall be considered a violation of this Act subject to the sanctions
provided in this Act.
Page 37 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 38 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 39 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Provided, That a consent order shall not bar any inquiry for the
same or similar acts if continued or repeated;
Page 40 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 41 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
or compromise, indemnification shall be provided only in responsibility for the charges but agrees to accept punishment as
connection with such matters covered by the settlement as to if he had pleaded guilty. Some parties may choose to enter this
which the Commission is advised by counsel that the persons to plea to avoid further costs in the case and possible liabilities a
be indemnified did not commit any negligence or misconduct. civil suit that could arise from the criminal action. Note this plea
is available only in criminal cases for anti-competitive
The costs and expenses incurred in defending the aforementioned agreement ( Sections 14a and 14b), and only up to arraignment.
action, suit or proceeding may be paid by the Commission in
advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding
upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the
Chairperson, Commissioner, officer, employee, or agent to repay
the amount advanced should it ultimately be determined by the
Commission that one is not entitled to be indemnified as provided
in this section.
Similarly, non-adversarial administrative remedies may be
Section 44. Jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Court. – The resorted to before the institution of administrative, civil or
Regional Trial Court of the city or province where the entity or criminal action. These non-adversarial administrative remedies
any of the entities whose business act or conduct Constitutes the include:
subject matter of a case, conducts its principal place of business,
shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction, regardless of the
penalties and fines herein imposed, of all criminal and civil cases
involving violations of this Act and other competition-related
laws. If the defendant or anyone is charged in the capacity of a
director, officer, shareholder, employee, or agent of a corporation Request for binding ruling. Some entities may find it advantageous to
or other juridical entity who knowingly and willfully authorized avail of request for binding ruling from the PCC when it is “in doubt”
the commission of the offense charged, the Regional Trial Court about whether an act or conduct is in compliance with, exempt from,
of the city or province where such corporation or juridical entity or in violation of, the PCA or other competition laws. This applies
conducts its principal place of business, shall have jurisdiction. only to contemplated, not existing, acts and no prior complaint or
investigation has been initiated.
Section 45. Private Action. – Any person who suffers direct
injury by reason of any violation of this Act may institute a
separate and independent civil action after the Commission has
Show cause order. This requires the entity to “show cause” why
completed the preliminary inquiry provided under Section 31.
there is no reason to (a) cease and desist from continuing identified
business conduct; (b) pay administrative fine; or (c) re-adjust business
CHAPTER VIII conduct or practices.
Page 43 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
OTHER PROVISIONS
Section 46. Statute of Limitations. — Any action arising from a Consent Order. Prior to the conclusion of PCA inquiry, the entity
violation of any provision of this Act shall be forever barred may submit a written proposal for entry of consent order, specifying
unless commenced within five (5) years from: terms and conditions which include, (a)payment of fines; (b) payment
of damages to injured party; (c) compliance report, and (d) other
requirements as the PCC may prescribe.
For criminal actions, the time the violation is discovered
by the offended party, the authorities, or their agents; and
For administrative and civil actions, the time the cause of
action accrues.
Section 47. Prohibition on the Issuance of Temporary
Restraining Orders, Preliminary Injunctions and Preliminary
Mandatory Injunctions. — Except for the Court of Appeals and
the Supreme Court, no other court shall issue any temporary
restraining order, preliminary injunction or preliminary
mandatory injunction against the Commission in the exercise of
its duties or functions: Provided, That, this prohibition shall apply
in all cases, disputes or controversies instituted by a private party,
including, but not limited to, cases filed by entities or those
claiming to have rights through such entities: Provided,
however, That, this prohibition shall not apply when the matter is
of extreme urgency involving a constitutional issue, such that the
non-issuance of a temporary restraining order will result in grave
injustice and irreparable injury to the public: Provided,
further, That, the applicant shall file a bond, in an amount to be
fixed by the Court, but in no case shall it exceed twenty percent
(20%) of the imposable fines provided for under Chapter VI,
Section 29 of this Act: Provided, finally, That in the event that the
court finally decides that the applicant was not entitled to the
relief applied for, the bond shall accrue in favor of the
Commission.
Page 44 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 45 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
CHAPTER IX
FINAL PROVISIONS
Page 46 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
(a) Article 186 of Act No. 3815, otherwise known as the Revised
Penal Code: Provided, That violations of Article 186 of the
Revised Penal Code committed before the effectivity of this Act
may continue to be prosecuted unless the same have been barred
Page 47 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 48 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 49 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 50 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 51 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 52 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 53 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 54 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 55 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 56 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 57 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 58 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 59 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Page 60 of 61
Joseph John S. Ronquillo Corporation Law
2nd Semester, AY 2021-2022 JD - 3
Transitional Clause
Firms have two years (from effectivity of the PCA) to “cure any
existing business structure, conduct, practice or any act that may
be in violation of the PCA.” This applies if administrative, civil
and criminal proceedings have not already been initiated prior to
the PCA effectivity.
Page 61 of 61