100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views114 pages

Hourly Billing Is Nuts

Uploaded by

Davide Ghezzi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views114 pages

Hourly Billing Is Nuts

Uploaded by

Davide Ghezzi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Introduction: Provides a personal background and sets the tone for addressing the shortcomings of hourly billing.
  • Backstory: Narrates the author's journey and realizations regarding the inefficiencies and drawbacks of billing hourly.
  • The Moral Dilemma of Hourly Billing: Explores ethical and practical issues faced by freelancers and businesses charging clients hourly.
  • Hourly Billing Prevents Growth: Explains how hourly billing limits business scalability and innovation.
  • Hourly Billing Hurts Software Projects: Discusses specific negative impacts of hourly billing on software development projects.
  • Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and Your Clients: Analyses the adverse effects of hourly billing on client relationships and business efficiency.
  • The Why Conversation: Details the important client conversations guiding value-based project pricing.
  • Introduction to Value Pricing: Introduces value pricing as an alternative to hourly billing, explaining its benefits.
  • Three Ways To Transition Away From Hourly Billing: Outlines actionable strategies to shift from hourly billing to value-based pricing.
  • Value Pricing FAQ: Answers common questions and concerns about adopting value pricing.
  • 100% Up-Front: Discusses the benefits and logistics of requesting upfront payments from clients.
  • Managing Multiple Projects Without Deadlines: Provides strategies for managing projects effectively without conventional deadlines.
  • How To Prevent Scope Creep: Offers solutions to prevent project scope expansion beyond agreed terms.
  • Useful Estimates: Guides on making accurate project estimates while avoiding common pitfalls.
  • 11 Questions To Ask Clients Before Writing Your Proposal: Lists essential questions to ensure clarity and alignment before drafting a proposal.
  • How to make $2000+ 'per hour': Shares strategies on increasing effective hourly rate through strategic positioning and expertise.
  • A For Effort?: Questions traditional metrics of effort versus outcomes in project work.
  • Cost is not Price is not Value: Clarifies the distinctions between cost, price, and value within projects.
  • More Revenue != Growth: Discusses why increasing revenue does not necessarily correlate with actual business growth.
  • Revenue vs Profit: Illustrates the importance of understanding true profit, beyond revenue figures.
  • Why Startups Are A Bad Fit For Value Pricing: Explains challenges and exceptions in applying value pricing to startups.
  • The Choice Is Yours: Encourages the reader to consider moving away from hourly billing for better business outcomes.
  • Appendix I: More Info: Provides additional resources, webcasts, podcasts, and reading materials related to value pricing.
  • Appendix II: Glossary: Contains definitions of various terms and concepts used throughout the book.

Hourly Billing Is Nuts

Essays On The Insanity Of Trading Time For Money

Jonathan Stark

Page i of 109
Copyright © 2016 by Jonathan Stark

All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced
or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission
of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.

Printed in the United States of America

v1.0

Jonathan Stark
One Richmond Square
Providence, RI 02906

Official website:
[Link]

Please email questions, comments, cheers, jeers, typos, and so on to:


hbin@[Link]

Page ii of 109
Acknowledgments
Thank you so much to the following amazing people who have helped me
crystallize the thoughts contained in this book:

Alan Weiss, Antonis Christofides, Blair Enns, Bob Spryn, Brad Irby, Brennan
Dunn, Charles Max Wood, Chris Booth, Chris Ferdinandi, Chris Moyer, Dave
Sullivan, David Trejo, Don Levan, Ed Gandia, Ed Kless, Elliot Betancourt,
Eric Davis, Fei Wang, Geneve Hoffman, Greg Lane, Greg Navis, Jack Tem-
plin, Jane Portman, Jason Kemp, Jean Tunis, Jeff Scornavacca, Jeff Ward,
Jeremy Green, Jon Hainstock, Jorge Colon, Joshua Nussbaum, Julie Elster,
Kai Davis, Katherine Porfilio, Kelli Shaver, Kelsey Kreiling, Kirk Bowman,
Kurt Elster, Mandy Moore, Marcus Blankenship, Marcus Lillington, Mark
Richman, Matt Inglot, Matt Navarre, Michael Steele, Mojca Mars, Molly
Thorsen Connelly, Nick Disabato, Paul Boag, Paul Jarvis, Philip Morgan,
Reuven Lerner, Roderic Campbell, Ron Baker, Sarah Greesonbach, Seth
Godin, Tomislav Car, Travis Northcutt, and Zack Gilbert.

Extra special shout outs to #PCR Mafia for being my trusted advisors, to
my coaching students who have taught me more than I could ever teach
them, and to all the wonderful folks on my mailing list who write me daily
with ideas, encouragement, and most importantly, excellent questions.

Yours,

—J

Page iii of 109


To Erica, Cooper, and Maggie

Page iv of 109
Introduction
Introduction

Welcome!

For the past fifteen years or so, I’ve been an active participant in various
software development communities. I’ve written four software books, I’ve
spoken at hundreds of events all over the world, and I’ve maintained open
source libraries used by tens of thousands of developers. I’ve hosted talk
shows, meetups, and podcasts. And of course, I’ve been involved with
hundreds of software projects for clients of all shapes and sizes from
bootstrapped startups to Fortune 500 companies.

Suffice it to say, I chat with tons of software developers. I have found


that whenever one of these discussions turns to the financial aspects of
a software project, virtually everyone tells me that they bill for their work by
the hour. I’m strongly against this practice because:

Hourly billing is bad for your business, your clients, and your projects.

I realize that most people bill for projects on an hourly basis. I also realize
that with enough discipline, it can seem like it’s working. However, it’s an
outdated practice born of cost accounting and factory management that
was never meant as a means of setting prices for professional services. As
far as I can tell, it only lives on through inertia.

If you disagree, let me ask you this:

When did you decide to start billing by the hour?

Never, right? Most people never consciously decided to bill for projects by
the hour. In fact, they don’t give the question any thought at all; they usually
just jump straight to “how much should I charge per hour?”

Page 2 of 109
Introduction

The unconscious acceptance of hourly billing as the best and only option
literally keeps me up at night. In fact:

I consider it my mission in life to rid the earth of hourly billing.

This is not just an issue for software developers. I’ve helped a wide range
of disciplines escape the insanity of hourly billing: designers, copywriters,
illustrators, photographers, accountants, lawyers, and more. The stories
in this book are mostly all from the software development world, but it is
clear to me that the underlying principles are valuable to a wide range of
professional service providers.

With my mission in mind, I am publishing this book of my essays on the


subject. It is my sincere hope that it will help you convince your colleagues,
your clients, and maybe even yourself that hourly billing is nuts.

Let’s get started…

Page 3 of 109
Backstory
Backstory

In my early thirties, I was making a little over $90,000 USD annually as the
VP of a boutique software development firm. It was a good company and
I loved my fellow employees, but I was miserable. I spent most of my time
arguing about invoices with clients, hounding developers to log their hours,
and responding to RFPs with estimates that almost always turned out to
be too low.

Then one day everything changed.

In a flash, I saw with total clarity that billing clients by the hour was hurting
me, my company, and our clients. It was the source of just about every
problem that we faced as a company. Simply put, hourly billing is corro-
sive to client relationships across all professional services. This includes
“digital” disciplines like graphic design, user experience design, copywriting,
software development, and so on. You can’t truly partner with your clients
if you’re billing by the hour, which means that you can’t do your best work.

Here are five reasons why this is true:

1. Billing by the hour implies that you will first provide an estimate
of the hours required to complete the work. This means that the
buyer has to make a purchase decision based on an estimate, not a
known cost. If the estimate turns out to be low then things get ugly
fast. Even if the client doesn’t blame you for the overage, they will
experience buyers remorse because they spent more on the project
than it was worth to them.

2. Billing by the hour encourages you to invoice in arrears (i.e., invoicing


your client AFTER you’ve done the work). This puts you at the mercy

Page 5 of 109
Backstory

of the client, usually on a weekly basis throughout the course of a


project.

3. Billing by the hour allows you to “get to work” before the client’s
actual desired outcome has been identified. It’s a classic example
of “Something must be done! We’re doing something! Something
has been done!” Consider this: If you don’t have a goal, you can’t
succeed. If you can’t succeed, you must fail. If you fail, your client
will be sorry they hired you.

4. Billing by the hour punishes increased productivity. If you are billing


by the hour, you have a subconscious incentive to NOT become more
efficient. Because of this, your skills will stagnate and your clients
will suffer.

5. Billing by the hour creates bureaucracy. You fill out your timesheets.
You send your timesheets to the client with your invoices. Your client
has to review your timesheets and approve your invoices. Your client
may ask (or demand) to discuss perceived discrepancies from one
timesheet to the next. None of this activity produces a beneficial
outcome for either you or your client. It’s a complete waste of time.

Having had this epiphany, I just couldn’t continue working by the hour so
I left to start my own firm. Within a year, I had doubled my income. More
importantly, I had drastically increased the quality of my work life. I was
not tracking my hours, I was not working 60-80 hour weeks, and I was not
debating invoices with clients (in fact, I rarely had to send invoices at all).

Page 6 of 109
How I Realized that Hourly Billing
is Nuts
How I Realized that Hourly Billing is Nuts

In 2005, I was managing a small software development firm that built


custom workgroup software. At the time, we had 10 developers and billed
projects out at $150/hr. The most senior developer was a guy who I’ll call
Fred, and the most junior was a guy I’ll call Barney.

Fred wrote elegant, bullet-proof code and he did it fast. He was totally self-
managed, fun to be around, and had stellar customer satisfaction numbers.
We paid Fred $90k per year.

Barney was just starting out in the industry, and as such, he wrote a lot
of spaghetti code and it took him a long time to do it. He needed a lot of
attention, encouragement, and training. Although he wasn’t the greatest
coder, he was very personable and kept his customers quite happy. We
paid Barney $45k per year.

At a certain point, money got really tight and we had to consider every alter-
native, which included the possibility of letting someone go. Fortunately it
never came to that, but the situation did reveal a bizarre truth:

If we fired someone, it would have to be Fred.

This was completely counter-intuitive because we were in the business of


writing software and Fred was better at writing software than Barney. In
fact, Fred was better at writing software than anyone I’d ever worked with
and we were lucky to have him at all.

However, Fred was fast and expensive. He burned though projects so


quickly that we sometimes couldn’t get new clients fast enough to keep

Page 8 of 109
How I Realized that Hourly Billing is Nuts

him busy. And when we did have work for him, he would bang it out quickly
and efficiently.

Barney, on the other hand, was slow and cheap. Once, we gave him a project
that would have taken Fred two weeks, and Barney was still billing hours
against it six months later. We were paying Barney half of what we were
paying Fred, but Barney was bringing in steady money from a single client,
and for a long time.

I just couldn’t reconcile this situation; I knew something was wrong. My


head told me to keep Barney, but my heart told me to keep Fred. After
weeks of struggling with this puzzle, I was eventually forced to question
the underlying assumptions of the business. And that’s when the light bulb
went on:

Billing by the hour was the source of virtually every problem our firm was
facing.

Sure, hourly billing was (and is) the norm with my colleagues and the
expectation of my clients. But just because everyone does it doesn’t mean
it’s sane.

Billing by the hour is just as bizarre as billing by the pixel, or by the line, or by
the color. They are all arbitrary units of measure that have nothing whatsoever
to do with the outcome of the work.

I know you’re probably thinking, “Er… no… hours are different because that’s
my TIME… and pixels or lines or colors, those aren’t my time… and time is
money… and something, something…”

Page 9 of 109
How I Realized that Hourly Billing is Nuts

I get it. This is hard to wrap your head around. But stick with me. Suspend
your disbelief. Keep an open mind and the benefits will be life-changing.

Page 10 of 109
The Moral Dilemma of Hourly
Billing
The Moral Dilemma of Hourly Billing

Imagine that you’ve estimated a 40 hour job at $200/hr for a total of $8000.
The client happily approves it and you rejoice.

After some initial research, you discover that there is a tool available for
$1000 that will allow you to deliver the project in 5 hours, rather than the 40
hours that you’ve estimated. What do you do?

A) You buy the tool for $1000, you deliver the work in 5 hours, and bill
the client for 5 hours. Result: You work 5 hours, pocket $0, own the
tool, and the client loves you.

B) Have the client buy the tool for $1000, you deliver the work in 5 hours,
and bill the client for 5 hours. Result: You work 5 hours, pocket
$1000, the client owns the tool, and the client loves you.

C) You buy the tool for $1000, you finish the work in 5 hours but wait to
deliver it at 30 hours, and bill the client $6000. Result: You work 5
hours, pocket $5000, own the tool, and the client is very happy that
you finished faster and cheaper than promised.

D) You don’t buy the tool, you deliver the work in 40 hours, and bill the
client $8000. Result: You work 40 hours, pocket $8000, don’t own
the tool, and the client is satisfied.

I think that all of these options suck, and I don’t advocate any of them.
What’s interesting to me is the moral dilemma between C and D. C is clearly
dishonest, but it’s undeniably better than D for both you and the client. The
client saves $2k, receives their work 10 hours earlier than expected, and
you make $1000 per hour!

Page 12 of 109
The Moral Dilemma of Hourly Billing

I can imagine a variety of other options, and I’m sure you can, too. Unfor-
tunately, none of them would address the underlying issue: that billing by
the hour for software projects makes no sense. Software projects should
be billed based on the client’s perceived value of the outcome. Period. How
many hours it takes you to deliver it is irrelevant; in fact, the fewer the better!

Hourly Billing Punishes Increased


Productivity
When I first switched to value pricing for software projects, I was struck by
my sudden inclination to research and purchase tools. These days, I don’t
think twice about dropping $500-$1000 for something that will make my
work go faster or better.

Herein lies an insidious truth about hourly billing: If you are billing by the
hour, you have a subconscious incentive to NOT become more efficient.
Because of this, your skills will stagnate and your clients will suffer.

Page 13 of 109
Hourly Billing Prevents Growth
Hourly Billing Prevents Growth

Technically, I shouldn’t care if software consultants bill for projects by the


hour. If some software consultant wants to do themselves - and their clients
- a disservice by charging hourly, it gives me a competitive advantage. After
all, clients don’t buy hours; they buy results, which is what I sell.

While this line of reasoning might make sense in the short term, it’s deadly
in the long term. Here’s why:

A software consultant who bills by the hour has no financial motivation to


build or purchase tools that would save time, to participate in professional
development, or to stay on the cutting edge of industry research. In short,
they have no incentive to get better at what they do.

When an entire industry consists of people operating in this manner, there


is little hope of progress for the group. No one will forge ahead in a ground-
breaking way because there is a financial disincentive to becoming better
at solving problems faster.

Therefore, an industry that bills by the hour will never get any better at what
they do.

I find this realization both depressing and ironic, considering that everyone
in this business despises inefficiency. Hopefully, you agree.

Page 15 of 109
Hourly Billing Hurts Software
Projects
Hourly Billing Hurts Software Projects

Over the years, I’ve worked with a lot of software consultants. The vast
majority of them follow a project lifecycle that looks more or less like this:

1. A client (let’s call him Bob) needs something built (a web application,
for example).

2. Bob contacts a consultant (Alice) because he knows that she builds


web applications.

3. Bob and Alice discuss the application until she feels like she under-
stands it fairly well.

4. Bob asks Alice how much it will cost to have her build the web app.

5. Alice estimates that the project will take around 100 hours, she
multiplies that by her $200 hourly rate, and sends an estimate for
$20k to Bob.

6. Bob approves the estimate, and Alice starts working.

7. Alice keeps track of her hours while she is working. For each time
entry, she includes a description of what she did.

8. Alice sends an invoice to Bob every Monday for the hours worked in
the previous week. The invoice includes a list of the hours worked
with descriptions.

9. Bob reviews Alice’s hours and pays her invoice.

Steps 8 and 9 repeat until the project is done.

Two Problems of Hourly Billing Process


I want to call out two of the problems inherent to this process:

Page 17 of 109
Hourly Billing Hurts Software Projects

1. Administrative overhead for Alice

Alice is spending up to four hours every week tracking her hours, preparing
an invoice, and processing payments. If she has two or three projects going
at the same time, she could be losing more than ten hours per week to
administrative duties.

2. Bob will start questioning hours

Sooner or later, Bob is going to start reviewing Alice’s hours. This typically
manifests itself with questions like, “Why did it take two hours to run the
data import last week, when it only took one hour the previous week?”
Addressing these questions can be a big time suck for both parties, and
it adds no value to the project. More importantly, it creates a trust fracture
between the two parties.

This behavior usually becomes more pronounced as the actual hours ap-
proach (or exceed) the estimated hours. If the web app isn’t done and Alice
is 50 hours over estimate, Bob is going to become really irritable. In this sit-
uation, he’ll probably go back over every invoice looking for inconsistencies
or items that he feels shouldn’t have been charged for.

It’s a vicious cycle - more time is wasted debating about hours, mutual
distrust is increased, and the project is further delayed.

Page 18 of 109
Hourly Billing Hurts Software Projects

How to Fix the Problems of Hourly Billing


Most software consultants try solve the inherent problems of hourly billing
by optimizing the process. They think the solution is to use better time-
tracking software, or to integrate their CRM with their accounting system, or
- my personal favorite - to bill clients hourly for time spent resolving disputes
about hours.

It is true that optimization can make these problems less bad. However,
optimization treats the symptoms and ignores the disease. The real way to
solve the inherent problems of the hourly billing process is to stop billing
software projects by the hour. When a project fee is based on the perceived
value to the client rather than the hours of the consultant, the issues listed
above simply evaporate.

A software project is a goal oriented, ongoing collaboration between client


and consultant. A project can’t be a true success for both parties without
this mutual trust. Mutual trust is the natural result of the two parties
sharing in the risk (and reward) of the undertaking. Value pricing creates a
shared risk/reward environment.

Page 19 of 109
Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and
Your Clients
Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and Your Clients

Why question the logic of hourly billing at all? It’s what your clients expect,
right? It’s how your competitors do business, right? Not to mention other
professional service providers like lawyers, accountants, and psychiatrists.
If it works for them, why won’t it work for you?

I’ll tell you why: hourly billing is corrosive to client relationships across all
professional services. This includes digital disciplines like graphic design,
user experience design, copy writing, software development, and so on. You
can not truly partner with your clients if you’re billing by the hour, which
means that you can’t do your best work, which means that your clients
aren’t loving you as much as they could :-)

There are lots of reasons why this is the case. Here are a few:

1. Hourly billing misaligns the direct financial incentives between you


and your client (i.e., the longer the project takes, the better it is for you
and the worse it is for the client). This creates trust fractures which
erode the relationship over time if your estimates are not accurate.
This erosion is manifest as questioning hours, micromanagement,
and lack of testimonials/referrals.

2. Hourly billing allows you to get started before knowing your client’s
goal. It’s a classic example of “Something must be done! We’re doing
something! Something has been done!” Consider this: If you don’t
have a goal, you can’t succeed. If you can’t succeed, you must fail.
If you fail, your client will regret their decision to hire you.

3. Hourly billing discourages you from becoming more efficient. On


one of my first value based projects, I found myself shopping around

Page 21 of 109
Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and Your Clients

for plug-ins that might help me complete the project faster. I found
one that did just what I needed. It was $700 - which was more
than I had even spent on a piece of software - but it saved weeks
of development time which directly benefited both me and my client.
Had I been billing by the hour, it wouldnt have even occurred to me to
look for a plug-in solution.

But the biggest drawback to hourly billing is this:

Hourly billing places an artificial limit on your income.

There are only so many hours in the year, and you can only charge so much
per hour, right? Let’s say you wanted to double your hourly billing income.
There are really only three ways to do this, and they’re all pretty bad:

1. Work twice as much

2. Double your hourly rate

3. Hire a bunch of junior employees

I’ll break down each…

1. Work twice as much


Working twice as much is obviously not going to be attractive to anyone.
You probably feel like you’re working too much already. In any case, it’s

Page 22 of 109
Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and Your Clients

unsustainable and doesn’t scale your business in a meaningful way. Work-


ing more will decrease your productivity (and therefore produce diminishing
returns) and eventually lead to burnout.

2. Double your hourly rate


Increasing your rate significantly will make it tough to close deals because
the new rate will appear unfair or offensive in comparison to old rate or
market rate for similar services.

Existing clients - Significantly increasing your rate will be unattractive to


your existing clients because you have conditioned them to believe that you
are worth $X per hour. If you suddenly announce that you now cost $2X
per hour, they’ll likely consider this an unfair increase and start shopping
around.

Prospective clients - Assuming that your rate is more or less in line with
other folks in your industry, doubling your rate will make you the premium
option. If you don’t have anything significant that differentiates you from
your competitors, you are not going to close many deals.

3. Hire a bunch of junior employees


Hiring juniors is probably the most seductive of the three growth options so
I want to take a second to dispel any fantasies that might be floating around

Page 23 of 109
Hourly Billing Is Hurting You and Your Clients

out there. If you hire junior employees, you will no longer spend your days
doing the thing that you love; you will become a manager.

You will be posting jobs, reviewing resumes, writing training docs, manag-
ing benefits, sending tax documents, doing one-on-ones, boosting morale,
demanding time sheets, generating productivity reports, and more.

Additionally, you will be responsible for client-facing administrative duties


like writing proposals, closing deals, managing resources, tracking time-
lines, sending invoices, chasing late payments, haggling over hours entries,
etc.

And let’s not forget marketing and sales. If you have even a half-dozen
employees, you’re going to need a steady stream of leads to cover payroll
every month. Every. Single. Month.

Sure, you can build a big profitable firm by hiring a bunch of junior employ-
ees. And if that’s the lifestyle you want, then great! But if you don’t want that
lifestyle and are only considering it because you think it’s your only option
for growing your business, I’m here to tell you that there is an alternative:
value pricing.

Page 24 of 109
Introduction to Value Pricing
Introduction to Value Pricing

It is not the primary goal of this book to teach you about value pricing; the
primary goal of this book is to shatter the illusion of hourly billing. That
said, I have found that presenting an attractive alternative to hourly billing
can be quite persuasive. Value pricing is that attractive alternative.

So let’s talk about value pricing.

Value Pricing is like fixed bids on steroids. Unlike a typical fixed bid quotes -
which are based on cost-plus or time and materials calculations - the prices
in a value priced quote are based on the client’s perceived value of the
project outcome.

But what exactly do I mean by value? I like this definition which I found
from Ron Baker:

Value is the maximum amount that a consumer would be


willing to pay for an item

I find this to be an extremely elegant definition because it concisely illus-


trates the inherent subjectivity of value. Value is not an intrinsic property
of an item - it’s a vague sense of “what something is worth” to a particular
person in a particular situation.

Many people are uncomfortable with the fluid nature of value but embracing
this truth is the key to scaling your business in a sustainable way.

Page 26 of 109
Introduction to Value Pricing

Fixed Bids? You’ve Gotta Be Kidding…


I can hear you thinking…

“Wait a sec… are you talking about fixed bids?”

Yes, value pricing results in you providing a fixed price quote to your client.

And now I hear you screaming…

“NOES!!! I’LL DIE OF SCOPE CREEP!”

No, not if you do it right you won’t.

I’ve talked to a lot of consultants who have dabbled with fixed bids and
gotten burned. In every case, they had based their fee on time and materials
or cost-plus calculations. If you make this same mistake, then yes… you will
probably get killed by scope creep because you’ll set your fee way too low
every time.

If you have been burned by fixed bids in the past, think back to the engage-
ment and imagine how it would have gone differently if you had charged
2, 3, or maybe 4 times more money for it. I’m guessing you wouldn’t have
gotten killed. The secret sauce of value pricing is understanding why many
clients are happy to pay more than double what you or your competitors are
currently charging.

Page 27 of 109
Introduction to Value Pricing

When you base your fixed price on the client’s perceived value of the project
outcome instead of your estimated labor, you can set your fees significantly
higher, deliver more effective results, increase customer satisfaction, and
more.

Shifting from billing clients by the hour in arrears to giving clients value-
based fixed bids in advance is not as easy as flipping a light switch. For
most people, hourly billing is baked into their business at every level (e.g.,
systems, culture, relationships, etc) and it takes time and effort to migrate
away from it.

But migrating away from hourly billing is the key to unlocking profits that
might seem unimaginable to you today. Keep at it. Like all worthwhile
things, it takes a lot of effort but the payoff is huge.

“Nothing in the world is worth doing unless it means effort,


pain, difficulty.” –Theodore Roosevelt

Page 28 of 109
The Why Conversation
The Why Conversation

A value price represent some fraction of the amount that a prospective


client thinks a given engagement will be worth to their business. For
example, if a client thinks your project is worth $500,000 annually to them,
then you can easily charge them $50,000 for the work, even if it’s only going
to take you a short time to complete.

But how do you figure out what something is worth to your client? You
can’t figure it out exactly (even they typically don’t know exactly) but you
can get close enough to drastically increase your fees. This is a gray area
that folks are usually pretty uncomfortable with, but it’s the key to closing
highly profitable deals.

Here’s how you do it:

Before you write up a project proposal, you’ll have a meeting of some


kind with your prospect. During that meeting, I’m going to have you do
something unusual:

You’re going to try to talk them out of working with you.

Yup. Just keep asking “Why?” until you are convinced that the client would
benefit from hiring you. For example:

• “Why do this now? Wouldn’t it be better to keep an eye on the issue


for a few months?”

• “Why hire someone expensive like me? Couldn’t you save a ton of
money by outsourcing this to India?”

• “Why not use something off-the-shelf? Wouldn’t that be cheaper


than paying for custom code?”

Page 30 of 109
The Why Conversation

• “Why even bother with what will clearly be a very expensive project?
Wouldn’t it be cheaper to do nothing?”

For obvious reasons, I call this the “Why Conversation”. By the end of a good
Why Conversation, you will have a pretty good idea of what the company’s
desired outcomes are, and roughly what those outcomes are worth to them.

To calculate your price, divide the value by 10 and ask yourself, “Would I
do the project for this price?” If the answer is “hell, no!” then you proba-
bly aren’t a good fit for the project and should politely refer the prospect
to someone else. If the answer is “hell, ya!” then you have found your
price. Write up the quote at 1/10 of the estimated value and send it to the
prospect.

If your answer is somewhere in between, go back and divide the value by 5


instead of 10 - if you get a “hell, ya” then submit a quote, if not, refer them
to someone else. Dividing by a number smaller than 5 is probably a waste
of time because you’re working with very rough numbers. Smaller divisors
make it more likely that there won’t be enough margin between the low end
of the value range and the high end of the cost range for anyone to make a
profit.

Page 31 of 109
Three Ways To Transition Away
From Hourly Billing
Three Ways To Transition Away From Hourly Billing

In my coaching program, I have found it is pretty hard for most students to


transition straight from hourly billing to value pricing. The hourly mindset
infects every aspect of most businesses so thoroughly and completely that
it’s impossible for the owner to imagine that there is an alternative. I have
come up with the following three methods for easing into value pricing:

1. Add a fixed price option to an hourly proposal

2. Value price a small chunk of a larger hourly project

3. Create a productized service

(NOTE: Strictly speaking, these approaches are not value pricing. They are
transitional steps that will help you break the habit of trading time for money.
Once you do that, value pricing will appear relatively obvious.)

1. Add a value priced option to an hourly proposal

This is the easiest way to dip your feet in the water with value pricing. I quite
like it because it makes evident the inherent lunacy of hiring someone by the
hour to do software project work. It can also help with converting existing
clients over from hourly billing to value pricing.

Here’s what you do:

The next time you’re ready to send an hourly estimate to a client, simply
add a premium priced fixed price option.

The fixed bid should not be more than 85% more than the estimate

Page 33 of 109
Three Ways To Transition Away From Hourly Billing

So, if your estimate is $10,000.00, then the most the fixed bid should be is
$18,500.00.

If you’re not comfortable with $18.5k for the fixed bid then your estimate is
too optimistic and you should raise it.

For example…

Let’s say you are about to send your client a proposal for 100 hours of
web development work at $100/hour. Make the $10,000.00 hourly estimate
Option 1, and add a fixed price Option 2 where you guarantee results for
$18,500.00 paid 100% up-front.

Doing so does a few things:

1. It will get everyone thinking about results instead of deliverables.

2. It will make the client explicitly aware of the fact that hourly billing
doesn’t guarantee results, just labor.

3. It will help you understand how to have a better value conversation


next time.

4. You will increase your odds of closing the deal.

5. You will decrease your odds of leaving money on the table.

If you do have your two numbers within the 85% range and get push back
from the client about the delta seeming extravagant, point out to them the
difference in the risk profiles. Namely, that the estimate puts all the risk on
them, and the fixed price puts all the risk on you. If they are open to rolling
the dice with the lower number, that’s up to them.

Page 34 of 109
Three Ways To Transition Away From Hourly Billing

2. Value price a small chunk of a larger hourly project

Another way to get started with value pricing is to break off a small chunk
of a larger project and quote a fixed price for it. I’ve done this on occasion
with new builds where the client wasn’t 100% clear on what they wanted.

In a situation like this, you can try charging a flat $1000-$5000 for a
roadmapping phase that will result in a clear definition of what should
be built. It’s like helping the customer author the RFP that they aren’t
expert enough to author themselves. The output of this would be some
combination of reports, documentation, wireframes, prototypes, style
guides, user journeys, business logic, and so on.

To decrease the odds that the customer will balk at paying for discovery
that they feel you should be doing as part of the larger project, you should
emphasize that the roadmap is completely portable with zero lock-in. In
other words they don’t have to hire you to execute the plan - they can shop
it around to any firm to do the actual build.

3. Create a productized service

A productized service is a lot like a custom service except that you don’t
write a proposal for it; instead, you write a sales page for it. In fact,
sometimes the easiest way to spin up a productized service is to go back
through your custom proposals and convert one into a sales page. Good
candidates for productized services are activities that tap your smarts
rather than your labor. This will make them more naturally limited in scope.

Here’s an example:

Page 35 of 109
Three Ways To Transition Away From Hourly Billing

I’m recognized as an authority on responsive web design. Building cus-


tom responsive websites from scratch would be very hard to productize
because client demands would vary greatly from project to project (I could
solve this by setting the price astronomically high, but that’s a separate
conversation).

However, I can think of a few services that would leverage my expertise and
authority in the space without inviting a scope nightmare. I could offer a
service where I will tweak your existing desktop site such that it will pass
Google’s new mobile SEO ranking criteria. Or I could offer a site teardown
that was delivered as a report detailing the 10 worst mobile issues on your
site, and the things that you could have your developer do to fix them.

The trick here is to think of new ways to leverage your expertise. Are you
a JavaScript developer with ten years of experience? Instead of coding for
clients, why not offer a service that helps your client pick the best front-
end framework for their needs? Or front-end performance reviews? Or a
“de-jank” consultation?

You want to charge for your head, not your hands. Smarts, not labor.
Results, not deliverables. Outcomes, not activities.

Think about it.

Page 36 of 109
Value Pricing FAQ
Value Pricing FAQ

Recently, I was having an initial kickoff call with a new coaching client.
We were planning to work on a number of issues, but his primary interest
was converting his consulting business from an hourly billing model to
a value pricing model. As with most folks new to value pricing, he had
some practical questions about the approach. Several common points
were raised, which I have shared below.

Fallout From Bad Estimates


You can underestimate just as easily with value pricing project as you can
with an hourly billing project. The difference is the fallout. Specifically,
if I underestimate an hourly project, my punishment is angry phone calls,
endless review of hours entries, running reports and billing statements…
IOW, a bunch of administrative BS and fights with the customer.

On the other hand, if I underestimate a value priced project, my punishment


is… more development work. Guess what? I love development work. That’s
why I do this job. Sure my profit margin is decreased, but doesn’t making
$100/hr instead of $200/hr sound a lot better than arguing with a customer
for an hour over a 30 minute timesheet entry?

Value Pricing Feels Different


To really understand the difference between value pricing and hourly billing,
I think you need to do at least one project yourself. You need to feel the

Page 38 of 109
Value Pricing FAQ

internal shift - the loss of the safety net, the spike in efficiency, and the
changes in behavior that these feelings encourage. This shift will make
you a better developer, advisor, and partner.

Converting Existing Customers


You don’t have to convert to value based all at once. And, it’s HARD to
convert existing customers. Try it on a single project with a new customer
first. Trying to re-frame all of your experience from a value based perspec-
tive (“how would I have done all these deals with value pricing”) before
internalizing the approach is a recipe for failure.

Cost vs Value
There are two numbers that you need to determine when bidding a project:
the cost to you and the value to them. So, when I talk to a client about a new
project, I first guess at how many hours I think it will take me, and I multiply
that by $200 to come up with X. Then, I guess how much it is worth to the
client and I divide that by 10 to come up with Y. I then give the client a quote
for the greater of X and Y.

Success with this approach is clearly dependent on the accuracy of the


guesses, but if Y is significantly greater than X - say, five or ten times greater
- then the risk is drastically reduced. The closer Y is to X, the more sure you
want to be of your guesses.

Page 39 of 109
Value Pricing FAQ

Fixed Bid vs Value Pricing


There is a difference between a traditional fixed bid and value priced quote.
Ultimately, both result in a static priced quote to the client, but fixed is based
on a cost estimate to the developer and value is based on a percentage of
the value to the client. Hence, fixed bids are almost always too low.

Favorable Payment Terms


Payment terms are intrinsically related to the way I practice value pricing.
You could do value-based projects and take payment in installments, or in
arrears, but I recommend against it. Rather, submit your quote with the
most favorable terms (i.e., 100% up front). If the client balks - although I
find that most don’t - it’ll give you something to concede in negotiations.

Exceptions to Value Pricing


You can’t use value pricing for everything. Value pricing is primarily for
writing a custom proposal for a particular client. Products and productized
services, for example, are bought on value but the prices are not set on value.
They are a volume play meant to be profitable at scale. Think of it like this:
if you’re in a situation where you’re tempted to present an hourly estimate
to a client, consider using value pricing instead.

Page 40 of 109
100% Up-Front
100% Up-Front

One of the wonderful side benefits of ditching hourly billing for value pricing
is that you can ask for 100% payment up-front. This sounds pretty unortho-
dox to most people and I’ve gotten a bunch of questions about it. Here are
the three most common:

• Why I ask for 100% up-front payment

• How often I “get away with it”

• What I do when clients push back

I’m going to answer all of those questions here but before I do, you need to
know something very important:

I NEVER lower my prices once I have submitted a proposal.

Seriously. Never, ever.

Since I refuse to budge on price, I need to give myself room to negotiate


in other areas. This is where my payment terms come in. Here’s a typical
example of the payment terms I offer:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

I never assess an hourly or daily fee, since you should not have
to make an investment decision every time my assistance
may be needed. This is a unique feature of my consulting
practice.

The pricing for each option is as follows: option 1 is $4,900.00,


option 2 is $9,500.00, and option 3 is $24,000.00 USD. Please

Page 42 of 109
100% Up-Front

note that these are fixed prices, not estimates. You will not
pay a dime more than your selected price. The fee must
be paid in full on acceptance to schedule the project. I am
available to start on Monday, May 11, 2015. This quote is
good for 30 days.

My work is guaranteed. In the event that you feel that I


am not meeting the standards described herein, or based on
our mutual conversations and agreements, I will refund your
entire fee upon such notification.

Roughly 80% of the time, clients agree to these payment terms without
question. In the 20% of cases where a client doesn’t, their reply is usually
one of the following:

1. “Are you CRAZY?!” (aka Sticker Shock)

2. “How about 50% now and 50% on completion?” (aka 50/50 Terms)

Sticker Shock

In the “Are you CRAZY?!” scenario, my prices were just way too high and
the prospect is suffering from an acute case of sticker shock. It’s almost
impossible to revive the deal at this point so I usually just thank them for
their time and move on. (In the rare case when I really want the client, I have
a backup approach that can sometimes revive the deal but that’s a story for
another day…)

Page 43 of 109
100% Up-Front

50/50 Terms

In the “How about 50% now and 50% on completion?” scenario, my prices
are in the ballpark but I haven’t built up quite enough trust with the client.
To mitigate their perceived risk, the client offers 50/50 payment terms - i.e.,
“How about we do 50% up-front, 50% when the work is done?”

My reply to them looks like this:

We can discuss but I don’t think it is in your best interest. A


software project is like a lake freezing - at some point you are
sure it’s solid, but you never know exactly when it happened
:-)

In other words, we are not going to know exactly when this


project is done. Tying the final payment to the delivery date
will put pressure on you to sign-off too soon.

If some bug crops up in a weird corner case three months after


your sign-off, I’d prefer to just fix it for free under the terms
of this agreement (vs what most other consultants would do:
“Sorry, you signed off. I’ll fix it but it’s going to cost you.”)

To remove the sign-off issue, what would you think about


doing 50% to get started and 50% in 30 days?

Almost every prospect to whom I’ve suggested this alternative has ac-
cepted. Once or twice, I’ve had a prospect balk at my suggested date (i.e.,
30 day from project start), to which I say:

Page 44 of 109
100% Up-Front

That’s fine. The exact date doesn’t matter to me. Pick what-
ever date you think is reasonable and we can get started.

In this case, the client will probably pick a date around when they think
the project will be completed. This date will almost surely be too early, but
having agreed to a specific fixed date for the final payment allows everyone
to relax about the sign-off (because there won’t be a sign-off).

A wonderful side effect of this agreement is that if the client goes dark, you
won’t really care because it doesn’t delay your final payment. They can take all
the time in the world to respond to requests for feedback, provide copy changes,
send FTP info, etc… It won’t matter to you because you’ll still get paid in full on
a known schedule and can do other work while you wait for them to get back to
you. No pressure for you, no pressure for them.

Win Win
Ultimately, asking for 100% up-front is better for you, better for the client,
and better for the project. Give it a shot on your next proposal - you’ll be
pleasantly surprised by the results.

Page 45 of 109
Managing Multiple Projects With-
out Deadlines
Managing Multiple Projects Without Deadlines

I have a policy of not agreeing to deadlines for software projects. I’ve


received a bunch of questions about this. Here’s a typical one:

I am curious how you balance projects like you do without an


end date. In the scenario you paint with 100% up front but
client takes too long at the start of the project to get things
started so the project doesn’t wrap up on time. You have
signed another client or two which starts after you initially
thought the first project would wrap up because you need
more income. Now the first client you signed is starting to
really ramp up but you have two more clients to juggle. How
do you handle this scenario?

I have two answers to this question - the short one and the long one.

The Short Answer


Deadlines don’t keep projects on track - diligent communication keeps
projects on track.

If you need Client A’s Project to wrap up on or around a particular date so


you can get started on Client B’s Project, then it’s up to you to manage Client
A. Setting an arbitrary deadline won’t help with this. If you find that you just
can’t manage Client A, then you should consider firing them (or at least not
working with them in the future).

Page 47 of 109
Managing Multiple Projects Without Deadlines

The Long Answer


You probably shouldn’t be scheduling software projects back-to-back in the
first place.

Scheduling projects back-to-back can be an indication that your margins


are too tight, or that you’re trying to “make hay while the sun shines” (i.e.,
you’re in the “feast” phase of the feast/famine cycle), or that your business
is not diversified enough.

In my particular case, diversification has shielded me from project schedul-


ing issues. I virtually never schedule software projects back-to-back. I just
don’t need to because I maintain a balance of money making activities.
Each has a very different profile in terms of how much effort they require,
when that effort is required, and whether I can pick it up or put it down
without significant switching costs.

Here are some examples:

• Monthly retainers (i.e., clients pay a flat monthly rate for 24/7 access
to pick my brain)

• Speaking engagements (e.g., public conferences, corporate events,


board presentations)

• Training classes and workshops

• Miscellaneous dev work (e.g., code reviews, teardowns, prototypes,


proofs of concept, feasibility research)

• Book and video sales

Page 48 of 109
Managing Multiple Projects Without Deadlines

All of these offerings have pros and cons, but there are a few that are worth
highlighting.

Monthly retainers have been the big winner for me. They are very stable,
low risk, and much more lucrative than dev work. I can run two or three of
them concurrently and they pay five figures monthly. I’ve had a number of
retainer clients keep me on for a year or more.

Speaking engagements are very good money but you’re not going to be do-
ing them every day; I shoot for roughly one per month. I’ve gotten as much
as $7500 for a 1-hour speaking engagement, but my average is probably
closer to $4000. Added bonus: speaking gigs are great for positioning
yourself as an authority and often lead to high-value engagements like
retainers or other consultative work.

Training classes and workshops have been similar in frequency and fees to
speaking engagements for me, but they are more work to setup and deliver.
If you’re currently just doing dev work and want to branch out without too
much risk or fear, then training classes and workshops are a great place to
start.

Diversification FTW!
This mix of offerings has been so strong for me that these days I rarely
code for money. It’s just not worth the time, risk, or stress. Instead, I keep
my dev skills sharp by working on side projects or creating educational
materials. And every once in awhile I’ll make an exception and take on

Page 49 of 109
Managing Multiple Projects Without Deadlines

a client project that I find particularly interesting or meaningful (but this


usually only happens once or twice per year).

If you’re booking projects back-to-back, try to think of ways you can


sidestep the issue by offering a wider range of services.

One path that should work for most devs would be to start with training
classes or workshops, move into speaking engagements, and ultimately
to monthly retainers. Along the way you can release info products (e.g.,
books, videos) and pickup one-off miscellaneous work (e.g., code reviews,
teardowns, prototypes, etc).

Page 50 of 109
How To Prevent Scope Creep
How To Prevent Scope Creep

When I talk to a roomful of software consultants about transitioning away


from hourly billing to value pricing, one of the first questions I get asked is:

“How do you prevent scope creep if you give clients a fixed price?”

My answer is simple:

“I don’t.”

The truth is, I don’t have to. I trust my clients to not take advantage of me.
And guess what? They don’t take advantage of me.

The Baseball Bat


Consultants use hourly billing as a baseball bat. When the client asks for
something that’s out of scope, the consultant hits the client with the bat.
Statements like these probably sound familiar:

“That feature was not part of the original estimate. I’ll build it for you, but
it’s going to cost you.”

“I’d be happy to discuss that with you, but it’ll have to be on the clock.”

“You should have told me about that earlier. This is going to blow the
estimate.”

When a consultant says that he has to bill by the hour in order to prevent
his clients from abusing his time, it tells me that he doesn’t trust his clients.
Which raises a key question:

Page 52 of 109
How To Prevent Scope Creep

Is it reasonable to expect people to trust you if you don’t trust them back?

True Story
Back when I worked hourly, I had this one client who was really chatty on
the phone. He’d tell me about his weekend, his kids, etc. I genuinely liked
the guy, and we’d often spend 30 minutes or so gloriously gabbing about
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Unfortunately, this non-work banter created an issue for me. My employer


was billing me out by the hour and I was responsible to have a certain
number of billable hours per week. So, for every 30 minutes of shooting
the breeze with my client, I had to work an 30 extra minutes in the day in
order to meet my quota.

I explained this predicament to my client on several occasions. I’d say


something like: “I’d love to hear about how you proposed to your wife, but
I have to get back to work.” Of course, he would say he understood and
things would be strictly business for a little while. But soon enough, he’d
start gabbing again.

Eventually, I pulled out the bat. I started tracking the time spent on the
phone - regardless of the subject matter - and billed him for it. I’m sure you
can imagine the effect this had on our relationship.

Page 53 of 109
How To Prevent Scope Creep

The Moral
When I think back on this situation, I just shake my head. Consultants
should jump for joy if clients are willing to share personal details of their
lives! It builds trust, which is an essential ingredient to a successful rela-
tionship, business or otherwise. Throwing this opportunity away because
of 30 “lost” minutes here or there is asinine.

If you are a consultant, value pricing will allow you to build trusting re-
lationships with your clients. This will lead to more successful projects,
repeat business, and in many cases, rewarding friendships. However, it
does require that you put down the bat.

Page 54 of 109
Useful Estimates
Useful Estimates

I recently did a proposal tear-down for a coaching student (I’ll call him Chris).
The proposal was for a client who has three silo’d software systems and
Chris was proposing to consolidate everything into one system to alleviate
a lot of inefficiency and frustration.

The proposal was pretty good overall, but there was one paragraph really
rubbed me the wrong way. Here’s what Chris wrote:

The benefit from the system is not easy to substantiate finan-


cially. The savings of personnel time and the simplification
of the computing infrastructure, although they will have long-
term financial effect, cannot easily be measured. Instead, this
is an investment of strategic importance.

Ouch. Just at the point where Chris should have been quantifying the value
of the project to the client, he threw up his hands and said, “I have no idea
how much money this project will save your business!”

Here’s the thing:

Just because something is hard to measure, doesn’t mean that you can’t
make a useful estimate.

I suggested he change the paragraph to something like this:

Although it is hard to say exactly how much financial benefit


the new system will provide, estimates can be made. We

Page 56 of 109
Useful Estimates

predict that the new software will save each user at least 1-
2 hours of work per week. If you multiply that by 10 users
making roughly $20/hr, and again by 50 working weeks per
year, the software will save between $10k-$20k annually.

Naturally, Chris would be spit-balling the numbers somewhat, but the


client can easily adjust up or down in his or her head. In any event,
$10k-$20k is way better than “I have no idea how much you’ll save.” Having
numbers–even estimated numbers–gives you something to anchor your
price against, which makes it much easier to get your proposals approved.

P.S. There’s another angle to this situation that bears mention. Namely, that
Chris should not have had to estimate the financial benefits at all. Instead,
he should have had a conversation with the client before the proposal stage,
during which he helped the client articulate what the project would likely be
worth to the company.

Page 57 of 109
11 Questions To Ask Clients Before
Writing Your Proposal
11 Questions To Ask Clients Before Writing Your Proposal

When I used to bill by the hour, my initial conversation with a prospect was
all about determining the scope of work so I could come up with what I
hoped would be a reasonably accurate cost estimate. Now that I price
based on value, I don’t bring up scope at all in my initial conversation.
Instead, I try to find out how valuable the project is to the client so I can
decide if there’s any hope of me delivering positive ROI. This can be a simple
thing to do if you know what to ask, are a good listener, and take good notes.

When you meet with a client, work some of the following questions into the
conversation as appropriate. You don’t need to ask them all–pick three or
four that you’re comfortable with and memorize them. Modify the wording
to suit your style so you don’t feel awkward saying them out loud.

Once you have their answers, you’ll be ready to create a proposal that uses
the client’s language and is priced based on the value they themselves
have expressed. This greatly increases the likelihood that the client will
greenlight your project.

Without further ado, the questions:

1. What would a homerun look like for you?

2. What about your business keeps you up at night?

3. If you could wave a magic wand and change one thing about your
business, what would it be?

4. What’s been at the top of your to-do list forever?

5. Is there anything that your competitors could do that would threaten


your business?

6. How do you acquire new customers?

Page 59 of 109
11 Questions To Ask Clients Before Writing Your Proposal

7. Have you been putting off any difficult decisions?

8. Does your business go through slow periods (weekly, monthly,


yearly)?

9. If you had to set priorities now, what three things must be accom-
plished?

10. How has your business performed over the last 12-months?

11. Is there anyone on your team who isn’t performing up to your expec-
tations?

Page 60 of 109
How to make $2000+ “per hour”
How to make $2000+ “per hour”

If you’re like most folks, you probably think that “growing your business” is
synonymous with “hiring employees”. I’m living proof that hiring is not the
only way to grow your business. Hiring more laborers is multiplying your
hands. The real growth comes from figuring out how to multiply your head.
But how do you multiply your head?

Like so:

• Solving bigger problems

• …for bigger clients

• …with less effort.

If you are always looking for bigger problems, and attracting bigger clients,
and decreasing your own labor, you can exponentially increase the impact
of your smarts - and as a side effect, drastically increase your effective
hourly rate (EHR).

Here’s an example:

I’m writing this to you from a fancy hotel room in southern California. It’s
gorgeous outside. My balcony overlooks a golf course on one side and a
marina on the other. Somebody is literally yelling “FORE!” as I type this.

I’m here to present a talk to group of about forty senior managers and
executives. My talk is grounded in technical topics that I learned in my
career as a developer. BUT I’m presenting it in a way that is meaningful to
business leaders.

The talk is one hour long. I got paid $6,500.00 USD for this, 100% in advance.

Page 62 of 109
How to make $2000+ “per hour”

It wouldn’t be fair to say that the talk REALLY only took me one hour - I had
to fly cross country, for example - but when you consider my level of effort,
my level of risk, and my time commitment, I think you’ll agree that my EHR
is pretty dang good.

And OBTW, I’m giving the same talk again in two weeks to a different group.

And again, two weeks after that.

Now, I’m not saying that you should start trying to sell yourself as a speaker
if that’s not your thing. What I am saying is that you should be looking
for ways to increase your impact without increasing your workload - and
especially without increasing your headcount.

Page 63 of 109
A For Effort?
A For Effort?

Which of the following criteria should be used to calculate a student’s exam


grade?

1. Amount of time spent working on the test

2. The percentage of correct answers

Which of the following criteria should be used to calculate a consultant’s


fee?

1. Amount of time spent working on the solution

2. The progress made toward the client’s goals

Moral of the story:

Clients don’t want your time; they want their goals achieved.

In fact, the faster you achieve their goals, they more they’ll be willing to pay!

Hourly billing is nuts.

Page 65 of 109
Cost is not Price is not Value
Cost is not Price is not Value

When discussing value pricing, three words come up all the time:

• Cost

• Price

• Value

Lot of folks use these words interchangeably which leads to confusion. For
the purposes of my coaching, it’s important to be crystal clear on these
terms, which I define thusly:

Cost - The least amount of money a seller (i.e., you) will accept for a product
or service.

Price - The amount of money exchanged between buyer and seller.

Value - The largest amount of money a buyer (i.e., your client) will pay for a
product or service.

When value pricing is working well, your cost is less than the price, and the
price is less than your client’s value.

Let’s imagine a small web dev project that might have numbers like this:

Cost: $1,500
Price: $2,000
Value: $3,000

The difference between cost and price (i.e., $500) is your profit. The differ-
ence between price and value (i.e., $1,000) is your client’s profit. This is the
ideal scenario because both parties make a profit from the engagement.

Page 67 of 109
Cost is not Price is not Value

(BTW - this is why clients freak out when hourly jobs go over estimate;
because the price starts to approach or exceed their value).

As you get better at value pricing, you will dream up offerings that have
lower cost and higher value.

For example, imagine presenting a remote workshop that provides 10x


profit for both parties:

Cost: $1,000
Price: $10,000
Value: $100,000

Or let’s say you offer a cloud computing optimization report that provides
20x profit for both parties:

Cost: $50
Price: $1,000
Value: $20,000

Numbers like these give you much more wiggle room AND higher profit for
both parties AND less work for you AND often faster delivery for the client.
Monster win!

Page 68 of 109
Revenue vs Profit
Revenue vs Profit

As software developers, we tend to discount our time.

And by “discount” I mean “forget about”

Let’s talk about revenue vs profit real quick…

Revenue — the amount of money you receive from your clients.

Profit — your revenue minus your cost.

Mkay, but what is the “cost” in this case?

If you’re a typical lone-wolf software developer, your costs might seem


insubstantial:

• A laptop

• An internet connection

• Copious amounts of coffee

That’s about it right?

Wrong.

You forgot your biggest expense: YOUR TIME!

Think of it like this:

What if you continued to do all the biz dev, marketing, sales, admin, and
project management, but PAID SOMEONE ELSE to do your dev work?

Page 70 of 109
Revenue vs Profit

Even if your dev was the most amazing ever, and there was no communi-
cation latency, and nothing was lost in translation, this dev would certainly
be your biggest project expense.

In other words, YOUR DEV WOULD EAT ALMOST ALL OF YOUR PROFITS!

(sorry for all the caps)

Now…

When you are chief, cook, and bottle washer, you tend to forget about
counting your dev time as a COST.

But that’s EXACTLY what it is.

I don’t care how much you love coding… every hour you spend doing dev for
a client, you are NOT spending an hour:

• Building tools to make your job easier

• Marketing your business

• Creating new products

• Contributing to open source

• Playing Unreal Tournament with me :)

• Hanging out with your friends

• Having cocktails with your spouse

• Playing with your kids

• Writing your memoirs

• Finger knitting (yes, it’s a thing)

Page 71 of 109
Revenue vs Profit

• etc…

Here’s the money quote:

Development work is GREAT for revenue, but SUCKS for profitability.

Revenue is a vanity metric. What you want is profitability.

Page 72 of 109
More Revenue != Growth
More Revenue != Growth

I was talking to a dev friend the other day who was proudly reporting his
business “growth.”

The conversation went like this:

dev: “I hired 2 devs at the beginning of the year and I’m on track to double
revenue!”

me: “That’s great but… you probably doubled your costs, right?”

…long pause…

dev: “Yeah, I guess you’re right.”

Remember:

Increasing your headcount is not growth.

Increasing your revenue is not growth.

Increasing your profits is growth.

Page 74 of 109
Why Startups Are A Bad Fit For
Value Pricing
Why Startups Are A Bad Fit For Value Pricing

Value pricing is virtually impossible if you can’t talk to the true stakeholder.

This makes venture backed startups a really unattractive target market for
value pricing.

Here’s why:

Even if you’re talking to the CEO, he or she typically still has to answer to
partners and investors in order to make a final decision.

Furthermore, if the startup doesn’t yet have a predictable revenue stream,


it’s very difficult to come up with a realistic value for whatever it is you might
be doing for them.

In other words, the value can range from $0 to billions of dollars, depending
on what happens in the future. So it’s virtually impossible to calculate a fair
price.

(It’s like selling value-based services to a gambler - if he hits, the value ends
up being huge; if he doesn’t hit, the value is zero.)

There are some exceptions, but in general my advice to students is to avoid


picking venture backed startups as a target market.

Two exceptions:

• Bootstrapped startups are fine because you can talk to the decision-
maker

Page 76 of 109
Why Startups Are A Bad Fit For Value Pricing

• Creating productized services for venture backed startups is fine


(since productized services have a published price, buyers can self-
select based on the value that they think they’ll derive)

Page 77 of 109
The Choice Is Yours
The Choice Is Yours

Hourly billing has always been a bad fit for pricing professional services
but newer trends like globalization, offshoring, and spec work marketplaces
have made this situation dramatically worse.

At a tactical level, it may be relatively hard for you to ditch hourly billing.
But tactical challenges don’t amount to much compared to the big picture.
When all is said and done, the options at a strategic level are pretty straight
forward:

Embrace hourly billing and race to the bottom, or reject hourly billing and
race to the top.

The choice is yours.

Page 79 of 109
Appendix I: More Info
Appendix I: More Info

Here’s a TON of valuable free resources I’ve put together for you:

Webcasts

• How To Increase Your Income Without Hiring Junior Developers

• How To Price Your Services Without Leaving Money On The Table

• How To Write Proposals That Close Without Lowering Your Prices

• How To Prevent Scope Creep Without Writing Massive Spec Docu-


ments

Podcasts

• Elusive Moose Podcast: Value Pricing with Jonathan Stark

• Clients From Hell: When (And Why) You Should Stop Charging an
Hourly Rate

• Side Hustle Nation: How to Start a Consulting Business - Your First


$5k

• The First Million Podcast: Go from $0 to $5000 a month consulting


with Jonathan Stark

• Boagworld: Break the time barrier with value based pricing

• Freelancers Show: How to Attract Clients Without Doing Sales with


Jonathan Stark

• Freelancers Show: How and Why to Ditch Hourly Billing with


Jonathan Stark

Page 81 of 109
Appendix I: More Info

• The Business of Freelancing: Jonathan Stark on Risk Mitigation


through Fixed Bid Pricing

• Consulting Pipeline Podcast: Jonathan Stark on the Paradox of


Choice

• Art of Value: Do Not Assume in a Value Conversation with Jonathan


Stark

• Pricing Power: Positioning eliminates the billable hour with


Jonathan Stark

• High-Income Business Writing: Three Simple Ways to Transition to


a Value Pricing Model

• FileMakerTalk: Jonathan Stark on Value Based Billing

Articles

• 100% Up-Front

• How I Realized that Hourly Billing is Nuts

• The Moral Dilemma of Hourly Billing

• How Hourly Billing Hurts Software Projects

• How To Prevent Scope Creep

• Hourly Billing Prevents Growth

• 7 Thoughts on Value Pricing for Software Projects

• The Benefits of Pigeonholing

Page 82 of 109
Appendix I: More Info

Mailing List
Please sign up for my mailing list to receive proposal templates, email sam-
ples, and practical articles that will help you grow your business without
adding employees.

Get my 5-page proposal template and more…

Questions?
Any questions? Shoot me an email at jstark@[Link] and I’ll get
back to you as soon as I can. Pro tip: the shorter your email is, the faster
I’ll be able to get back to you.

P.S. Need personalized actionable advice on growing your software develop-


ment business? I’m available for a limited number of roadmapping sessions
each month, and would love to help Book a session now.

Page 83 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary
Appendix II: Glossary

“There is no greater impediment to the advancement of knowl-


edge than the ambiguity of words.” –Thomas Reid

The following glossary is meant to be understood in the context of my


coaching program and may not necessarily represent the global definition
of these terms in the strictest sense.

Since this document is directed specifically at students, I have used the


words “you” and “yours” for clarity in places where I felt the concepts might
be too abstract. In virtually all cases, these pronouns can be considered
synonymous with “seller” or “vendor…”

Answer Bomb

A value-packed post written in answer to a question posed by someone in a


Watering Hole. The goals of an Answer Bomb are to increase your authority,
attract prospects, and inspire trust with Buyers within your Target Market.
Care must be taken to not appear spammy or self-serving.

Audience

The collection of all people whose attention you have (e.g., Facebook fans,
Twitter followers, email subscribers, webinar attendees, etc).

Page 85 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Benefit

The positive outcome gained by the client from your product or service. See
also: Return On Investment, Value.

Beta Service

A new service that you provide for free to a test client in exchange for
feedback, pricing, and testimonials/case studies. See also: Testimonial.

Buyer

Synonymous with Client in the context of abstract pricing discussions


(e.g., “Value minus price equals the buyer’s profit”). Synonymous with
Economic Buyer in the context of sales and marketing discussions (e.g.,
“What conference do your buyers attend every year?”).

Call To Action

A request for someone to do something, typically associated with a button


or a link on a web page or in an email message (e.g., “like my Facebook
page”, “join my mailing list”, “schedule a call”, “buy my book”, etc).

Page 86 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Charm Pricing

The practice of using non-round numbers for pricing in an effort to make


them seem smaller. Probably works best for no- and low-touch offerings
in the two- and three-figure range. Low four-figure prices can be okay
depending on the context, but once you get to high-touch premium services
in the five- or six-figure range, they’re probably insulting to the buyer.

Client

A business or business person who pays you for products and/or services.
Synonymous with Customer, sometimes synonymous with Buyer. See
Sales Funnel for more info.

Cocktail Party Answer

A succinct and conversational version of your LFPS. The name comes from
the common scenario of someone at a cocktail party asking, “So, what do
you do?”

Conceptual Agreement

The goal of a value conversation is to reach conceptual agreement, whereby


you and your prospect come to an explicit and mutual understanding of

Page 87 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

the underlying motivation, desired outcome, and progress metrics for an


engagement. I believe this term was coined by Alan Weiss.

Conversion

An executed call to action.

Cost

The least amount of money a seller will accept for a product or service.

CTA

See Call To Action.

Customer

See Client.

Decision Maker

Person who decides whether or not s/he wants to hire you. Preferably (but
not necessarily) the same person as the economic buyer (e.g., the CMO
could be the decision maker, but s/he needs to get budgetary approval from
the CEO).

Page 88 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Deliverable

Typically a low-value, tactical activity or artifact self-prescribed by a client


who believes it will reach some underlying goal. Deliverables emphasize
your labor, not your smarts, and are therefore to be avoided because the
are not very profitable.

Demographic Market

A market segment defined by personal attributes of an individual (e.g., soc-


cer moms, Asian Americans, billionaire philanthropists, migraine sufferers,
etc).

Demographic Specialization

Niching Down on a Demographic Market.

Desired Outcome

See Objective.

Diagnosis

Assessment of a business’s situation and underlying goals. A diagnosis


should be performed before prescribing a course of action. Professionals

Page 89 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

have a moral obligation to do a diagnosis prior to prescribing action. Failure


to do so would be considered incompetent. See also Self-Diagnosis.

Discipline

Your craft, specialty, or job title (e.g., web designer, iOS developer, systems
architect, etc).

Drip

Email marketing automation software. [Link]

Economic Buyer

Person who controls the money in the client organization. Preferably (but
not necessarily) the same person as the decision maker (e.g., the CMO
could be the decision maker, but s/he needs to get budgetary approval from
the CEO).

Effective Hourly Rate

The dollar amount obtained by dividing a fixed bid price by the number of
hours worked.

Page 90 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

EHR

See Effective Hourly Rate.

Engagement

Can be used two ways: 1. as a synonym for a project or other collaboration


between you and your client, or 2. as a measure of audience interaction
(e.g., “my audience is much more engaged now that I’m spending more time
on my Facebook page”).

Expensive Problem

A painful issue that a business is aware of. Potentially the answer an owner
would give to a question like, “What keeps you up at night?”

Fixed Bid

A pricing model in which the sellers (i.e., you) provide a single, specific price
for an entire project. Typically, this price is based on the seller’s costs (e.g.,
time and materials). Compare to Hourly Billing and Value Pricing.

Fool-Proof Positioning Statement

See FPPS.

Page 91 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

FPPS

Acronym for Fool-Proof Positioning Statement. A term coined by Dan Janal


to refer to a two sentence message that tells people what a product or
service is, how they will benefit from it, and how it is different than others.
[Link]

Funnel

See Sales Funnel.

Gatekeeper

Person who blocks your access to the Economic Buyer.

Generalist

A person who markets themselves as capable of doing many different


types of work for many different types of clients (aka “Jack of all Trades”).
Contrast with Specialist.

Growth

Increasing profits. It’s important to point out that many things are mistaken
for growth. For example: hiring more employees, increasing gross revenue,

Page 92 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

capturing more market share, etc. These are growth tactics, and may
lead to growth, but could just as easily lead to decay. Here’s a fitness
analogy: regular weightlifting will probably lead to muscle growth but it
is not synonymous with muscle growth. A number of factors could prevent
weightlifting from resulting in muscle growth. When your bicep is bigger
today than it was yesterday, that is growth.

High-Touch

A sales process or service delivery that requires a lot of direct attention from
you (i.e., the seller). Typical with custom software development projects.

Home Page

The top-level page of your website hierarchy. Not necessarily a landing page
or sales page, but could be.

Horizontal Specialization

Niching Down on a skill, tool, or platform that can be applied to a very broad
range of client types. e.g., responsive web design, iOS development, MySQL
administration.

Page 93 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Hourly Billing

The practice of charging clients by the hour for your services. In the context
of a software project, the process typically goes like this: you provide the
client with an estimate that includes your hourly rate and the number of
hours you expect it to take to complete the work. The client approves the
estimate and you begin working. You track your hours as you do the work
and invoice the client in arrears on a periodic basis (e.g., weekly, bi-weekly,
monthly). Compare to Fixed Bid and Value Pricing.

JFS

Acronym for “Just Fucking Ship” by Amy Hoy. [Link]

Landing Page

A standalone web page distinct from your main website that has been
designed for a single focused objective. Your landing page should have
no navigation or other distractions. This is to limit the options available to
your visitors, helping to guide them toward your intended conversion goal.

Laser-Focused Positioning Statement

FPPS as applied to a professional services business to position the busi-


ness in a extremely specific way. It is typically not used verbatim in mar-

Page 94 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

keting materials, but rather as a guidepost for crafting various types of


messaging (e.g., tagline, slogan, cocktail party answer, etc).

Lead

Person who is in your Target Market but has not been qualified yet as a
Prospect. See also: Sales Funnel.

Lead Magnet

Something you offer for free in an effort to persuade people to subscribe to


your mailing list. Typical examples are whitepapers, reports, cheatsheets,
email courses, and so on.

Leverage

An effort multiplier. For example, a pre-recorded video course has more


leverage than a custom development project because the effort it took to
create the course will continue to generate sales income in the future with
no additional effort, whereas the custom project work only pays once.

LFPS

Acronym for Laser-Focused Positioning Statement.

Page 95 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

LOE

Acronym for Level Of Effort.

Low-Touch

A sales process or service delivery that requires little direct attention from
you (i.e., the seller). Typical with productized services.

Marketing

Things you do to make people in your target market aware of your products
and services (e.g., guest blogging, appearing on podcasts, speaking at
conferences, etc). The goal of marketing is to create leads. See also: Lead,
Prospect, Sales, and Sales Funnel.

Mats

Slang for materials (e.g., “I have to finish my mats for the webinar tomor-
row”).

Nar

Slang for webinar (e.g., “I have to finish my slides for the nar tomorrow”).

Page 96 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Mercedes Option

Slang term for a your most premium offering. Typically your highest price,
highest profit, highest touch, custom service.

Niche

A specialized but profitable corner of the market.

Niching Down

Moving from a generalist position (e.g., full-stack web developer) to a more


specialized position (e.g., Shopify consultant).

No-Touch

A sales process and product delivery that requires no direct attention from
you (i.e., the seller). Typical with info products.

Objective

A desired outcome. For example, “Destroy the Death Star.” See also:
Strategy, Tactics.

Page 97 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Offering

Something you sell (i.e., a product or service).

Perceived Value

See Value.

Pigeonholing Yourself

See Niching Down.

Pipeline

Scheduled work (e.g., “my pipeline is full through the end of this year”).

Platform Specialization

A subset of Horizontal Specialization that targets a tool or platform that


your ideal buyer was involved in choosing. Niching Down on Shopify, Word-
Press, or Salesforce are examples of Platform Specializations because
your buyer almost certainly was involved in choosing the technology in
question. Niching Down on tools like Photoshop, JavaScript, or MySQL are
not Platform Specializations because they buyer probably didn’t directly or
consciously choose them.

Page 98 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

Positioning

A marketing technique used to make your business more memorable. For


service providers, this is done by focusing your marketing message on a
particular facet of your business, on a specific target market, or both.

Preso

Slang for Presentation. A lecture-style event delivered live in person (e.g.,


conference session, workshop, keynote presentation) or over the internet
(e.g., webinar). A recording of such event may be referred to as a preso for
short, but really it is a recording of a preso - e.g., “Here’s a link to (a recording
of) my preso at SXSW..”

Price

The amount of money exchanged between Buyer and Seller. A price is


typically known to the buyer in advance of making his or her purchase
decision. A notable exception to this is hourly billing wherein the buyer
makes the purchase decision on the basis of an estimate.

Product Ladder

A series of offerings priced in a graduated “order of magnitude” fashion


(e.g., $10, $100, $1,000, $10,000). The idea of the product ladder is to make

Page 99 of 109
Appendix II: Glossary

it easy to turn prospects into customers regardless of the level of trust you
have engendered with them. In other words, people who have just heard
of you will most likely enter at the bottom rung of your ladder (e.g., $10).
Assuming that they benefit from that purchase, they will have increased
trust and be more likely to move up the ladder.

Productized Service

A high-touch, customized service that you offer at a published price. Basi-


cally the same as a custom service except that you don’t have to write a
proposal for it, and it will have a fairly fixed scope.

Project

A collaborative enterprise that is designed to achieve a particular aim.

Prospect

Person who is likely to buy from you but has not done so yet. See Sales
Funnel for more info.

Roadmap

A plan for getting from current state to desired state.

Page 100 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Retainer

A specific type of productized service where you offer your clients access
to your expertise on a subscription basis - typically monthly but sometimes
quarterly or even annually. A client asks you a question over an agreed upon
channel (e.g., phone, email, Basecamp, Slack, etc) and you answer within an
agreed upon time frame (e.g., “within 90 minutes for requests made during
business hours, next business day for after hours requests”). Think of it
as a hotline to your brain. NOTE: Not to be confused with a typical legal
retainer, which is really just pre-payment for blocks of hours.

Return On Investment

The client’s profit, typically measured in financial terms. Calculated by


subtracting the price paid for a product or service from the value of the
outcome. Ideally, ROI is positive but can be negative. Positive ROI can be
thought of as a benefit.

ROI

See Return On Investment.

Page 101 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Rolodex Moment

A Rolodex Moment (RM) has occurred when someone you’re talking to is in-
spired to mentally run through the list of people they know and successfully
comes up with one or more who they should introduce you to for business
reasons. This will typically be in response to the listener’s first exposure to
your CPA or LFPS. RMs are most likely to occur in your audience if you
have adopted a Vertical Specialization or a Demographic Specialization
(e.g., “I help dentists” or “I help people who suffer from migraines”). RMs
are unlikely to occur in your audience if you have adopted a Horizontal
Specialization (e.g., “I help people who need QuickBooks integration”).

Sales

The things you do to convert a lead into a prospect, and hopefully into a
client. See also Sales Funnel.

Sales Funnel

A system or process for turning a Lead into a Client. For custom software
projects, this process would look something like:

1. Receive a Lead via email

2. Have a Value Conversation

3. Reach Conceptual Agreement

Page 102 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

4. Lead is now a Prospect

5. Submit a Project Proposal

6. Prospect approves the Project Proposal

7. Prospect is now a Client

Sales Page

A specific type of Landing Page where the conversion goal is to persuade


the visitor to make a purchase. See Landing Page for more info.

Self-Diagnosis

Clients often come to consultants with a self-prescribed course of action


based on an unstated self-diagnosis. It is the responsibility of the consul-
tant to validate the client’s desired course of action prior to any engage-
ment. Doing otherwise would be unethical and is grounds for losing the
right to practice in other professions (e.g., medical, legal).

Slogan

See Tagline.

Page 103 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Social Proof

Endorsements (tacit or otherwise) of your work from third parties. For


example: testimonials, case studies, client lists, etc.

Specialist

Someone who markets themselves as having a sharply focused area of


expertise. The area of expertise is typically defined by the overlap of the
specialist’s Discipline and the needs of the specialist’s Target Market.

Squeeze Page

A specific type of Landing Page where the conversion goal is to persuade


the visitor to subscribe to a mailing list. See Landing Page for more info.

Strategy

A concise, high-level approach for reaching an objective using various tac-


tics. For example: “Take the Empire off guard by sending an absurdly small
force to exploit a critical vulnerability.”

Page 104 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Street Cred

Evidence of expertise. Some kind of irrefutable proof that you know what
you’re talking about. The more impressive the evidence, the more credible
your claims of expertise. The better your street cred, the easier it is to build
trust with people in your target market. For example, Stephen King’s street
cred as a writer would instantly make him trustworthy as a writing coach.

Tactics

Specific, individual steps used to execute a Strategy and reach an Objective.


For example, “Send 3 small squadrons of x-wings. Get close to surface of
the space station and head for the exhaust port. Stay deep in the approach
trench to avoid surface guns. Once the TIE fighters show up, have two x-
wings flank the leader and defend against enemy fire…”

Tagline

A memorable, succinct, and descriptive version of your LFPS for use in


places like the title tag of your web page. It is typically expressed in written
form, but could also be spoken in certain business contexts (e.g., as you’re
being introduced prior to being interviewed on a podcast or walking on-
stage to present at a conference). Synonymous with slogan.

Page 105 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Target Market

A specific group of people who you specialize in serving. Typically this


group will be defined in terms of a vertical market (e.g., quick service restau-
rants, cosmetic dentistry, ski resorts), but could be a demographic (e.g.,
soccer moms, Asian Americans, billionaire philanthropists), or a horizontal
technology (e.g., businesses who have mission critical dependencies on
WordPress, Shopify, Heroku, etc). A rough test for determining the viability
a potential target market is whether or not there is a conference that is
attended by buyers from this group. See also Vertical Market, Demographic
Market.

TBA

Acronym for “The Brain Audit” by Sean D’Souza. [Link]


com/products/the-brain-audit-32-marketing-strategy-and-structure/

Teardown

Constructive criticism of a web page, email message, sales letter, or other


marketing piece. A teardown can’t be done properly without knowing the
desired outcome of the marketing piece.

Page 106 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

Testimonial

Kind words from a client about your product or service. Used in your
marketing materials to build trust with members of your Target Market.

Testy

Slang for Testimonial.

TPM

Acronym for “The Positioning Manual” by Philip Morgan. https://


[Link]/authority-resource-center/the-positioning-manual-for-technical-firms/

Unique Difference

Component of a LFPS meant to make you stand out from your competition.
Your primary differentiator.

Value

The largest amount of money a buyer would pay for a product or service.
IOW - what a given product or service is worth to a given buyer. This is a
purely subjective measure; different buyers will value the identical product
or service differently. Furthermore, buyers will usually be unable to assign

Page 107 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

a dollar amount to a value if asked. However, they can usually react to a


dollar amount suggested by the seller as “worth it” or “not worth it.”

Value Conversation

A meeting between you and a prospect held prior to submitting your project
proposal. The goal of the meeting is uncover the underlying motivation,
desired outcome, and progress metrics for a project. Achieving this goal
means that you and your prospect have reached conceptual agreement.

Value Pricing

A form of Fixed Bid in which the price is based on the value to the buyer
instead of the seller’s cost. Compare to Fixed Bid and Hourly Billing.

VBF

Acronym for “Value-Based Fees” by Alan Weiss. [Link]


Value-Based-Fees-Charge-Youre-Worth/dp/0470275847

Vertical Market

A vertical market (or simply “vertical”) is a market in which vendors offer


goods and services specific to an industry, trade, profession, or other group
of customers with specialized needs. Typical examples of buyers in a

Page 108 of 109


Appendix II: Glossary

vertical market would be quick service restaurants, ski resorts, pet shelters,
auto repair shops, and so on. Technically, vertical market buyers could also
be people like soccer moms, Asian Americans, billionaire philanthropists
because these are also groups who have specialized needs. However, I
prefer to use the term “demographic” to apply to segmentation that is not
industry specific. See also: Target Market, Demographic Market.

Vertical Specialization

Niching Down on a Vertical Market.

Watering Hole

A place where Economic Buyers from your Target Market discuss business
matters. Could be conferences, professional associations, meet-ups, indus-
try periodicals, podcasts, Facebook groups, LinkedIn groups, subreddits,
private forums, Amazon book reviews, and so on. Watering Holes are a
great place to do market research and drop Answer Bombs.

WOM

Acronym for “word of mouth.”

Page 109 of 109

Common questions

Powered by AI

Fixed pricing can enhance a professional's positioning by highlighting a focus on value rather than time, which suggests specialized knowledge and confidence in outcomes. It allows professionals to present themselves as experts who understand the client's needs and can provide tailored solutions rather than just time-based services. This can also lead to more pertinent engagements like speaking gigs and retainers that are associated with authority .

Psychological barriers to moving away from hourly billing for clients include the expectation and familiarity with this model, which can create resistance to change due to comfort with the status quo . Clients may also question the higher perceived risk in fixed pricing and feel uncertain about the value-based model if it seems less tangible than tracking hours . For service providers, there's an ingrained belief in the reliability of hourly billing, and shifting to a value-based model requires a fundamental change in how they perceive value and outcomes . Clients might also become wary of the fairness and potential for being overcharged under a value pricing model . These barriers can be overcome by educating clients on the misalignment of hourly billing with service goals and demonstrating the benefits of fixed pricing, such as alignment with project outcomes and reduced project risks . Introducing hybrid models, like offering value pricing for parts of a project or providing fixed-price options alongside hourly estimates, can help ease clients into the new model, demonstrating the benefits without full commitment . Additionally, emphasizing the shared risk environment of value pricing can alleviate client concerns about fairness and motivate providers to prioritize efficiency and results over duration .

Strategic diversification in business can help overcome the limitations of hourly billing by shifting focus from selling time to delivering value-based solutions. Hourly billing often discourages efficiency and skill development because professionals have no financial incentive to improve process speed, leading to potential stagnation . Through diversification, businesses can adopt value pricing models which focus on delivering results rather than accounting for time spent. This allows businesses to break free from the constraints of hourly billing, enhancing efficiency and encouraging the use of innovative tools and strategies that add value to clients . Additionally, by focusing on broader service offerings or productized services, businesses can reduce administrative overhead associated with tracking billable hours, leading to smoother operations and potentially higher profits . Furthermore, a diversified strategic approach can mean creating fixed-price services or transitioning to value pricing, which shifts the risk from the client to the service provider, thereby aligning incentives for both parties to achieve successful outcomes . Overall, strategic diversification allows for specialization and the adoption of pricing models that reward improved efficiency and skill enhancement, addressing the inherent flaws of hourly billing ."}

Alternative pricing strategies to hourly billing include value pricing, fixed price, and productized services. Value pricing involves setting rates based on the client's perceived value of the project outcome rather than the time spent, which can enhance profitability and client satisfaction by focusing on results over hours . Fixed pricing can provide clients a static quote, though it is most effective when based on client value rather than costs, to avoid scope creep and ensure profitability . Productized services involve packaging expertise into a defined offering with a set price, thus avoiding the variability of projects and focusing on leveraging expertise rather than labor . These strategies align financial incentives and improve client relations by focusing on outcomes and shared goals, rather than creating tension over billable hours .

Value-based pricing encourages providers to prioritize quality and outcomes over billable hours because the payment reflects the value provided rather than time spent. As providers focus on fulfilling the client's objectives more effectively, it can lead to higher client satisfaction, better referrals, and a stronger professional reputation, unlike hourly billing, where the incentive could subtly shift towards longer projects .

Trust is essential in transitioning from hourly billing to value-based or fixed pricing models as it fosters a partnership-oriented relationship between clients and consultants. In value pricing, establishing mutual trust means both parties are sharing the risk and reward of the project, which can enhance collaboration and lead to more successful outcomes . Trust allows clients to feel comfortable with fixed or value-based pricing as they believe that the consultant is invested in delivering the best possible outcome, not just clocking hours . This trust extends to the client's willingness to pay higher fixed fees for perceived value and results, rather than just time spent . By moving away from hourly billing, clients are less likely to question and nitpick billed hours, reducing administrative friction and building a stronger consultant-client relationship . Trust is also built by ensuring that the price reflects the value to the client rather than the cost to the seller, which can help clients see the engagement as a strategic investment rather than a commodity service ."}

Hourly billing is considered outdated and potentially harmful because it introduces several inefficiencies and strains relationships between service providers and clients. It results in significant administrative overhead as professionals spend considerable time tracking hours, preparing invoices, and responding to disputes, none of which add value to the project . Hourly billing misaligns financial incentives; it benefits providers if a project takes longer, which disadvantages clients, potentially leading to mistrust and micromanagement . This model discourages efficiency since there is no incentive for providers to complete tasks faster or optimize processes, which can result in stagnation of skills and suboptimal outcomes for clients . Moreover, hourly billing limits income potential because it ties earnings to time rather than to the value delivered, deterring significant financial growth . Transitioning to value-based billing, where fees are tied to the perceived value of the outcome for the client, can mitigate these issues, fostering mutual trust, motivation for efficiency, and better client relationships .

Hourly billing can significantly impact a service provider's ability to expand or scale operations due to several reasons. Firstly, it often creates administrative overhead, as service providers spend considerable time managing timesheets, invoicing, and handling payment disputes, which takes time away from productive activities . Secondly, it discourages efficiency and innovation because providers are financially incentivized to take longer on projects, which can result in stagnation of skills and reluctance to invest in tools that increase productivity . Furthermore, hourly billing can damage client relationships, as it often leads to trust issues and disputes over the number of hours billed, which can negatively affect client retention and referrals . Lastly, it imposes a cap on income potential, as there are only so many billable hours in a day, making it challenging to scale beyond a certain point without significantly increasing rates or hiring more staff, which could dilute service quality . Transitioning to value-based pricing could offer a solution by focusing on results rather than time, aligning interests, and removing the income ceiling associated with hourly billing .

A service provider can justify transitioning from hourly billing to fixed or value pricing by emphasizing several advantages: 1. **Client Perceived Value:** Value pricing aligns fees with the client's perceived project outcome value, potentially allowing for higher fees and greater client satisfaction since it focuses on results rather than time spent . 2. **Efficiency and Trust:** Unlike hourly billing, which can lead to administrative burdens and trust issues, value pricing reduces these by focusing on a fixed outcome. This fosters a shared risk/reward environment, enhancing trust and collaboration . 3. **Profitability:** Clients may be willing to pay significantly more for value-based services, recognizing the reliability and value of fixed results over unpredictable hourly costs. This is a key factor in scaling business profitability . 4. **Reduced Administrative Overhead:** By eliminating the need for tracking hours, consultants can reduce administrative overhead, ultimately increasing efficiency and focusing on delivering outcomes instead of just logging time . 5. **Competitive Edge:** Providing a fixed price option alongside an hourly quote reveals the benefits of focusing on results rather than just labor, making the consultant's offerings more attractive compared to competitors sticking strictly to hourly billing . 6. **Prevention of Scope Creep:** Fixed bids tied to value can prevent scope issues because they are based on clearly understood outcomes, not on expanding hours or deliverables, reducing unexpected costs for both the provider and the client .

Hourly billing discourages innovation and efficiency because it creates a financial incentive for longer project durations. Professionals are less likely to explore efficient methods, like purchasing time-saving software, because these would reduce billable hours. This setup limits incentive for adopting more effective approaches when billing by the hour .

You might also like