QFD: House of Quality

Project: Three Pin Plug

Revision: NA
Date: 24/11/2021

Correlations
Positive +
Negative −
No Correlation

Relationships
Strong ●
Moderate ○
Weak ▽
Direction of Improvement
Maximize ▲
Target ◇
−
Minimize ▼
+
Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Direction of Improvement ▲ ▼ ◇ ◇ Customer Competitive Assesment
Requirements
Functional

Competitor #1: Product Name

Competitor #2: Product Name

Competitor #3: Product Name

Competitor #4: Product Name

Func. Requirement 1

Func. Requirement 2

Func. Requirement 3

Func. Requirement 4
Maximum Relationship
Customer Importance
Relative Weight
Weight Chart

Our Product
Customer
Requirements
(Explicit and
Row #

Row #
Implicit) 0 1 2 3 4 5

1 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 57% 8 9 Cust. Requirement 1

● 3 3 4 1 5 1

2 ||||||| 14% 2 9 Cust. Requirement 2

○ ● 5 4 1 2 4 2

3 |||||||||||||| 29% 4 3 Cust. Requirement 3

○ ▽ ○ 1 2 4 0 2 3

4 3 Cust. Requirement 4
○ 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

Our Product
14 14
Competitor #1
Competitor #2
15 15
Competitor #3
16 Competitor #4 16
Target for Functional

Target for Functional

Target for Functional

Requirement #1

Requirement #2

Requirement #3

Target

Max Relationship 9 3 9 3
Technical Importance Rating 600 42.86 157.1
Relative Weight 75% 5% 20%
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Weight Chart
|||||||||
||

Our Product 1 3 4 2
Competitor #1:Small Bolt 2 3 5 1
Competitor #2: Large bolt 3 0 4 5
Technical Competitive Assesment

Competitor #3: Upper part 4 1 5 4

Competitor #4: Lower part 5 5 2 1
5

Our Product
4

Competitor #1
3

Competitor #2
Competitor #3
2

Competitor #4
1
0

Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16