Eng204 Final
Eng204 Final
Gouthami Pillai
G0085113
Author’s Note:
This paper was prepared for ENG204 Advanced Academic Writing, taught by Professor
Adnan Ajsic.
1
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to argue that hustle culture is a bane in the workplace.
The trend has been romanticized among the youth, and is it grows in popularity within work
environments, this research paper aims to highlight the most detrimental effects while
addressing possible counter claims as well. Beginning with a guide into the antecedents of
hustle culture, the thesis is then supported by a three tiered argument. The first claim discuss
the negative impacts on the physical health of hustle culture proponents, then followed by the
ill effects on mental health. The paper then delves into the role of hustle culture amongst
colleagues and how it can weaken work relationships. Solutions have been put forward to
combat the issue, addressing both the Human Resource Department of business organizations
as well as the society at large. This research paper will thus convince the general public to
discourage the spread of hustle culture and instead, adopt healthier alternatives within the
workplace.
relationships
2
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
Introduction
(Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor, 2017) with international studies reporting higher rates – it is
considered one of the most common current addictions in Westernized [Link] study of
Development (HRD) department which accounts for research into the latest trends in the
work field. Consequently, adequate research needs to be done into one such trend among the
current working population - workaholism, a term now referred to as hustle culture. Defined
as the culture of valuing accomplishment, hustle culture refers to considering work the central
life aspect (Molino, Cortese, & Ghislieri, 2018). The trend revolves around performative
workaholism, with individuals working excessively sparing even sleep, meals, and important
events. With the likes of Gary Vaynerchuk’s talks and podcasts revolving around hustling,
and Nike’s 2015 “Rise and Grind” advertisement campaign, a plethora of media is constantly
to proponents of hustle culture who have fallen victim to the same. This research paper
includes an analysis of the workforce within an organization as a whole, due to which “co-
workers” will refer to the employees working alongside excessive workers. An alternate term
to refer to co-workers is “regular employees”, an indication of the normal workload they take
Hustle culture especially resonates with individuals who regard their work with the
utmost importance. This research paper aims to answer the question of whether or not hustle
culture is a positive trend in the workplace, providing various claims against the same.
3
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
Additional questions to answer would be figuring out how the trend comes about, what
differentiates an excessive worker from a regular employee and how the workplace morphs
when excessive workers are present. With the ill-effects of hustle culture being so prominent,
it needs to be eradicated both from the individual as well as the work life.
Defining the antecedents of hustle culture helps streamline the factors and determine
possible solutions. Various antecedents play a role in the spread of this culture, with personal
experiences, cultural background, and work environment being the most prominent. In a
study conducted by Clark, Michel, Zhdanova, Pui, and Baltes (2016), a large positive
correlation was found between workaholism and perfectionism. Defined as the tendency of
striving towards flawlessness and maintaining high personal standards, it revolves around
setting unrealistic expectations (Spagnoli, et al., 2020). Blended with a high level of self-
criticism, an excessive amount of time and effort is spent in order to achieve the desired level
feeling guilty about not working, owing to the constant plugging of hustle culture in the
media. The study conducted in 2016 (Clark et al.) also found that workaholics do not
necessarily enjoy the nature of their work, but instead enjoy simply working. While they
might not particularly derive pleasure from performing work, they tend to experience
Negative Affect (NA) while not working, which refers to negative emotions and poor self-
esteem. As mentioned by Spagnoli and his colleagues (2020), there are negative tendencies of
perfectionism that show often, such as excessive work-related stress, constant worry about
living up to expectations, and massive disappointment if the sky-high goals are not achieved.
excessive amount of time to perform even the most menial tasks, rendering their work
inefficient.
4
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
hustle culture. In 2010, a study conducted on working students concluded that extroversion,
Lelchook, & Taylor). This falls in line with the most commonly researched set of personality
variables by Spurk et al. (2016) found that major factors contributing to workaholism were
career goals, career insecurity and career commitment. Surprisingly, despite the high effort
put in by workaholics, levels of workaholism are positively correlated with career insecurity
(Spurk et al., 2016). The same study also showed a negative relationship between
workaholism and perceived organizational support – which meant the more support
employees perceived they received from their organization, the less workaholism tendencies
they would show. Thus, the organizational climate is a major aspect owing to hustle culture
within the workplace. Work design in some countries, mainly south-Asian countries like
Japan and China (Laurence, Fried, Yan, & Li, 2020) is crafted in a way that supports a high
work drive, neglecting the ill-effects of the same. It ultimately becomes the role of job design
to uses techniques that best matches employees to their jobs (Laurence, Fried, Yan, & Li,
in a way that does not render the job highly competitive or with a high job demand (Keller et
al., 2016).
Working intensively poses a severe risk for these workers’ physical health. A study
conducted by Burke, Matthiesen, and Pallesen (2006) concluded that excessive workers
5
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
reported the highest number of health complaints and requested the most time off. A study
conducted in 2015 among Japanese industrial workers also concluded that workaholism
predicted impaired health as well as lower life satisfaction in the future (Shimazu et al.) Since
the complete focus of intensive workers is devoted to their work, everything else becomes
secondary, including concern for their health. Less attention and time is spent on their
physical health, which ultimately leads to the employees recognizing symptoms far too late.
Stress is one of the main factors owing to their decreased physical health. Due to the
intensive workload, they take on, stress is undoubtedly a resultant.. Mentioned in the previous
section, burnout is a consequence of mental stress. Job burnout has multiple health related
effects, such as heart disease, Type 2 Diabetes, decreased immune system and substance
abuse (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2018). The circular relationship between workaholism and job
burnout is caused due to workaholics having lower levels of recovery and recuperation as
unable to recovery sufficiently reduces an individual’s immunity and eventually render them
inefficient in the workplace due to having a poorer health (2005). With excessive workers
working constantly, not only do the working hours become longer, but the time for leisure
becomes shorter. This is one of the prominent reasons owing to slow recovery, as time runs
short between sleep and rest (Fujimoto, 2014). Consequently, intensive workers have an
increased risk of high blood pressure, insomnia, and metabolic syndrome (Spagnoli, et al.,
2020).
These studies all prove that higher the work drive, higher the risk of low physical
health. These sleep disorders make their presence known in the workplace as well – with
drowsiness on the job and difficulty waking up, leading to tardiness (Fujimoto, 2014). Those
suffering physical illness also request more time off from work, or often even resign or retire
early due to excessive fatigue, which impacts the employee turnover of the organization.
6
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
Employee turnover refers to the number of employees that leave the organization during a
specific time period (Roder, 2019). Not only is a high employee turnover bad for the image of
an organization, but also increases the costs due to the hiring process. The process of
onboarding new employees includes the recruitment, interview and training costs.
However, proponents of hustle culture may argue that the effects on physical health
are subjective for different intensive workers. In Fujimoto’s study, an in-depth research was
conducted into different categories of workaholics – with the main groups being “work
driven”, “work enjoyment”, and “work involvement” (2014). The study concluded that a
negative correlation between workaholism and physical health was found only between the
“work driven” and “work involvement” categories. This meant that those who truly derived
enjoyment from the work they did, did not have any consequent ill-effects on their physical
health. In fact, those who falling under the “work enjoyment” category seemed to show a
Nonetheless, this does not mean that people who find meaning and enjoyment in their
work do not face health hazards. The more enjoyment they derive translates into more hours
spent at work. The cycle of stress and burnout then begins, ultimately converting “work
enjoyment” workaholics into “work driven” workaholics. As studies have proven, when the
working hours increase, the risk of damage t health also consequently increases. Thus, every
individual should lead a vocational lifestyle that takes health into account as well. Changing
employees lifestyle habits, thus, is not just the task of each individual employee but of the
Person–Situation Interaction Theory and Attribution Theory (Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor,
2017), the outcomes of hustle culture include stress, burnout, and low career and life
satisfaction. High levels of stress is one of the most harmful consequences of hustle culture,
with the heavy mental stress affecting every aspect of their like, both within and without the
work environment. Job burnout is a special type of stress wherein an individual is in a state of
physical and emotional exhaustion a loses their self-identity (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2018).
Burnout has multiple possible reasons with the most prominent ones being a lack of control
over the work, dysfunctional workplace dynamics, an imbalance between work life and social
life, and unclear job expectations. A circular pattern is formed, wherein job stress leads to a
burnout, and a burnout once again leads to stress, among other consequences such as fatigues,
well-being (SWB), with a particularly negative relationship with the primary component of
SWB, life satisfaction (Aziz & Zickar, 2006). Among a sample of employees from various
white-collar organizations, Aziz and Zickar concluded that a higher level of life
could be due to their lack of separation of time for leisure and relaxation, leading to a
monotonous lifestyle with a low quality (Vodanovich and Piotrowski, 2006). Work addicts
report more conflicts within their personal and social relationships as compared to regular
employees, which could lead to a lower SWB (Matuska, 2010). Other factors could also play
a part, such as marital conflicts, familial fall-outs, and loneliness and abandonment felt by
their children. Hustle culture proponents often establish themselves as absent in everyday
8
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
family life and important occasions due to their extensive work pattern and lack of
engagement. This cycles back into stress due to their workload. Workaholics also often
express regret in regards to family life and relationships outside work due to not devoting
enough time and [Link] factors leading to a lower Subjective Well-Being eventually
link workaholism to job dissatisfaction, stress, insomnia and health complaints (Caesens,
As noted by Spagnoli and his colleagues, numerous mental disorders come about as a
result of hustle culture as well, with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder being the most common
disorder, as well as perfectionism (2020). Perfectionism, which was discussed in the previous
section as one of the major antecedents of hustle culture, translates into a mental disorder
when blown out of proportion. The strain on mental health was also recognized by the
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan when it set up Project Team as a measure to
combat suicide, depression and other related problems. Published in May 2010, one of the
central themes of the report was “Enhancing mental health measures in the workplace and
support for workplace reinstatement – Promoting the creation of workplaces where each
individual is valued” (Ministry of Labor, Health and Welfare). Only a few months later, in
September 2010, a report was published, which included a proposal for a “new framework
The line between work addiction and excessive enthusiasm is quite thin, which is why
scholars have defined specific criteria to demarcate the border such as salience, mood
modification, tolerance and withdrawal symptoms (Andreassen et al., 2016). The authors’
research into workaholism and its correlation with physiological disorders found a link
adult population diagnosed with ADHD have a an impulsive nature which causes them to say
“yes” and take on more tasks than they can handle – which is a cause for over working.
Additionally, their hyperactive nature causes them to constantly be working without a need to
workaholics” thus showcase symptoms extremely similar to ADHD, and yet is currently
idealized in the media. The concern for employees’ mental health is therefore evident and
Workaholism in Teams
cooperatively in groups with co-workers (Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor, 2017). Roping back
into the perfectionism antecedent, workaholics prefer working on their own so as to have
complete control over their work. Additionally, they don’t receive the same amount of effort
from their co-workers’ side as they put into their work, and thus, don’t trust other’s work. On
the flip side, co-workers tend to form negative feelings towards the workaholics due to the
constant pressure applied with the continuous inspection of their work, or having them
completely taking over a project (Moyer & Aziz, 2018). Peer relationships within the
workplace get compromised as a result of these clashing work ethics. Thus, a competitive
mindset develops among the employees within the organization wherein they constantly work
The HRD department has to consider the major disadvantages that this poses within
the workplace. Firstly, the conflict within the workplace leads to poor employee relationships
and a lack of connection with each other. This invariably leads to a lack of motivation within
the organization, resulting in poorer, inefficient performance from the employees. Secondly,
the tension and animosity within the workplace compromise the work environment of all the
workers (Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor, 2017). With a positive environment being one of the
10
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
deciding factors while choosing a job, having a negative work environment come up simply
due to a few intensive workers is extremely inefficient. A third point to consider is the
resulting high staff turnover. While there can be a number of uncontrollable factors leading to
a high employee turnover rate, the image created translates into: the company has an
unsuitable work environment, causing employees to leave. This is a cause of concern not only
for the Human Resources team but for the Public Relations (PR) department as well.
Some studies, however, mention that co-workers sometimes advocate hustle culture as
they draw inspiration from the intensive workers around them (Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor,
2017). In contrast to their generally lax attitude towards work-at-hand, intensive workers are
always on top of their tasks and focusing on future tasks as well. This can often serve as
motivation to complete their own tasks. Especially while working in teams, observing the
work ethic of intensive workers gives co-workers an idea of how to tackle the problem. They
the difference between “working to live” and “living to work” (Kirrane, Breen, & O'connor,
2017) and still value their personal time off work. Moreover, this inspiration drawn from
Breen and O’connor, with these intensive workers having their focus completely on their
work, they tend to come off as troubling for colleagues who unwittingly impair their career
progress.
Solutions
Undoubtedly, the spread of hustle culture has brought forth inefficiency within the
few solutions have been put forward. First, having frequent meetings and team-building
workshops would greatly help build the sense of teamwork within the organization.
Highlighting the negative effects of intensive working on the workers’ physical and mental
health would raise self-awareness on the same. Team-building exercises also promote
building personal bonds with colleagues in the workspace. With a stronger bond, intensive
workers would feel less mental stress due to better work relationships, which would
eventually translate into their relationships outside the workplace as well. Additionally, a
closer bond with co-workers would make workaholics more susceptible to delegating tasks
and would be less likely to take up the brunt of the work by themselves.
redesign the employees’ jobs and tasks in a manner that does not promote hustle culture. As
intensive working could be a coping strategy to meet high work demands, focus of the HRD
productivity over the quality of output tends to become competitive and highly political.
Although restructuring the entire work organization would come at additional costs, they are
intensive workers would be to highlight the positive and motivational techniques of the
intensive workers in a nuanced way. These serve as a non-financial incentive for the intensive
workers, which ultimately translates into building their self-esteem and mental health, as well
as motivates co-workers who may not have noticed their efforts previously. However,
organizations do have to define the difference between hard work and excessive work to
Conclusion
Organizations face a threat due to the spread of hustle culture among the working
population. Employees face a number of ill-effects on their mental and physical health as a
consequence and find working in a team much more tedious. These bring about a sense of
animosity within the workspace, which eventually translates into a negative work
environment, and thus, a high employee turnover rate for the organization. Research into the
antecedents of workaholism concluded that the effects could be due to personal factors, such
the organizational climate and the work design. Therefore, it becomes the task of every
organization to focus on the minimization of hustle culture idealism within the workplace. A
few suggestions for the same were put forth, revolving around promotion of teamwork and
building work relationships, job re-structuring, and devising non-financial incentives to keep
the employees motivated and satisfied in their job. Bringing these suggestions into fruition
would help convert the current, inefficiently functioning workforce, into a more effective
one.
13
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
References
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., Hetland, J., Griffiths, M. D., & Rajita, S. (may 2016). The
[Link]
Aziz, S., & Moyer, F. (2018). Workaholism and occupational health: A translational review.
8998.11.1.52
Burke, R.J., Mattiesen, S. B., & Pallesen, S. (2006). Personality correlates of workaholism.
10.1016/[Link].2005.10.017
Clark, M. A., Lelchook, A. M., & Taylor, M. L. (2010). Beyond the big five: How
Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Zhdanova, L., Pui, S. Y., & Baltes, B. B. (2016). All work and no
Fujimoto, T. (2014). Workaholism and mental and physical health. Japan Labor Review.
Retrieved from:
[Link]
14
ERADICATING HUSTLE CULTURE IMPROVES EFFICIENCY
Keller, A. C., Spurk, D., Baumeler, F., & Hirschi, A. (2016). Competitive climate and
Kirrane, M., Breen, M., & O’Connor, C. (2017). A Qualitative Study on the Consequences of
10.1002/hrdq.21284
Laurence, G. A., Fried, Y., Yan, W., & Li, J. (2019). Enjoyment of Work and Driven to Work
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2018, November 21). Know the signs of job burnout. Retrieved October
burnout/art-20046642
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. (2010, September 7). “Jisatsu, Utsubyoto Taisaku
Purojekuto Chimu Torimatome ni Tsuite [On the summary report Team for Measures
against Suicide and Depression, etc.]”. Retrieved October 29, 2020 from
[Link]
Molino, M., Cortese, C., & Ghislieri, C. (2018). Daily Effect of Recovery on Exhaustion: A
Moyer, F., & Aziz, S. (2018). Workaholism and occupational health: A translational review.
Roder, N. (2019, June 17). What Is Employee Turnover (and Why It Matters). Retrieved from
Workfest: [Link]
matters/
Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N. (2015). Workaholism vs.
work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance.
[Link]
Spagnoli, P., Haynes, N. J., Kovalchuk, L. S., Clark, M. A., Buono, C., & Balducci, C. (2020).
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2016). A new perspective on the etiology of
Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Verhoeven, L. C. (2005). Workaholism in the Netherlands:
Measurement and implications for job strain and work-nonwork conflict. Applied
0597.2005.00195.x
Vitiello, K., Shahnaz, A., & Wuensch, K. L. (2016). Workaholism and Authenticity: The
Vodanovich, S. J., & Piotrowski, C. (2006). Workaholism: A critical but neglected factor in