URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION
FINAL EXAMINATION
1. Is the sanctuary of protection for all persons, citizens or non-
citizens, against any and all kinds of abuses of power and authority
by the government, or any of its officials and employees, or even
against any unwarranted violation of such rights by any other person.
a. Human rights c. Bill of rights
b. Civil rights d. Customer is always right
2. What section of the Bill of Rights states that “No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor
shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.”
a. Section 1 c. Section 2
b. Section 3 d. Section 4
3. It was defined as a law which hears before it condemns
a. Criminal law c. Law
b. Due process d. Civil law
4. What section of the Bill of Rights pertains to “Right to remain
silent and to have competent and independent counsel”
a. Section 12 c. Section 13
b. Section 14 d. Section 15
5. In relation to question number 4, what do you call the above
mentioned rights?
a. Bill of rights c. Miranda law
b. Human rights d. Miranda rights
6. Still in relation to question number 4, what is the landmark case
where these rights has been applied
a. Miranda vs. Lapena c. Miranda vs. Ohio
b. Miranda vs. Arizona d. Miranda vs. Tulfo
7. It refers to something which is more than mere freedom from
physical restraint or the bounds of a prison.
a. Liberty c. Freedom
b. Right d. Law
8. It refers to things which are susceptible of appropriation and
which are already possessed and found in the possession of man.
a. Life c. Property
b. Things d. Apay bagim
9. Can you effect search without search warrant in a law arrest?
a. yes c. no
b. partially yes d. partially no
10. It implies the right to freely utter and publish whatever the
citizen may please, and to be protected from any responsibility for so
doing, except so far as such publication, from their blasphemy,
obscenity, or scandalous character, may injuriously affect the
standing reputation or pecuniary interests of individuals.
a. Freedom of speech c. Freedom of the press
b. both a and c d. either a or c
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]
URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
11. Is the security given for the release of a person in custody of
the law, furnished by him or a bondsman, conditioned upon his
appearance before any court as required under the conditions
hereinafter specified.
a. Bail c. Arrest
b. Warrant d. Jay agkling kling
12. When an accused is either acquitted, or convicted, or the case
against him is dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express
consent, by a court of competent jurisdiction, upon a complaint or
information or when a formal charge sufficient in form and substance
to sustain a conviction and after the accused had pleaded to the
charge, the conviction or acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of
the case shall be a bar to another prosecution for the same offense.
a. Double jeopardy c. Incrimination
b. Prescription d. Termination
13. In relation to question number 12, what section of the Bill of
Rights discusses such right
a. Section 19 c. Section 20
b. Section 21 d. Section 22
14. In relation to question number 13’ choice, section 22 discusses?
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Due process d. Writ of habeas corpus
15. It is one which makes criminal an act before the passage of the
law and which was innocent when done, and punishes such act.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
16. It is any law which makes an innocent act crime after the act was
committed.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
17. It is one which aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it
was, when committed;
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
18. It is one which changes the punishment and inflicts a greater
punishment than the law annexed to the crime when consummated
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
19. It is one which alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes
conviction upon less or different testimony than the law required at
the time of the commission of the offense.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
20. It is one which assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies
only, in effect imposes penalty or deprivation of a right for
something which when done was lawful; and
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
21. It is one which deprives a person accused of a crime of some
lawful protection to which he has become entitled, such as the
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]
URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
protection of a former conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of
amnesty.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
22. It is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial
trial.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
23. It is a writ or order directed to the person detaining another and
commanding him to produce the body of the prisoner at a certain time
and place, with the day and the cause of his detention, to do, submit
to, and receive whatsoever the court or judge awarding the writ shall
consider in that behalf.
a. Bill of the attainder c. Ex post facto law
d. Writ of amparo d. Writ of habeas corpus
24. In relation to question number 23, is this writ available to a
foreigner whose detention is illegal in the beginning but which was
subsequently legalized with the issuance of a court order commanding
arrest?
a. Yes c. No
b. Possibly yes d. Possibly No.
25. What section of the Bill of Rights stating that “All persons have
the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial,
quasi-judicial or administrative bodies.
a. Section 14 c. Section 15
b. section 16 d. Section 17
26. It is the stage where an investigation is no longer a general
inquiry into an unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular
suspect taken into custody by the police or other law enforcement
agents who carry out a process of interrogation that lends itself to
elicit incriminating statements.
a. Investigation c. Preliminary investigation
b. Custodial investigation d. Interview
27. It involves questioning initiated by law enforcement officers
after a person has been taken into custody or deprived of freedom of
action in any significant way.
a. Investigation c. Preliminary investigation
b. Custodial investigation d. Physical Examination
28. The case where the Supreme Court held that the purpose of
providing counsel to a person under custodial investigation is to curb
the police-state practice of extracting a confession that leads
suspect to make self-incriminating statements.
a. People v. Rapeza c. People vs. Miranda
b. People v. Arizona d. People v. Gamboa
29. The case where the Supreme Court held that subjection to
paraffin test does not require that the right to have competent
and independent counsel be afforded as this is necessary only
in testimonial compulsions, not when it is the body of the
accused which is proposed to be examined.
a. People v. Rapeza c. People vs. Miranda
b. People v. Arizona d. People v. Gamboa
30. Are police line-ups considered as part of custodial investigation?
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]
URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
31. In relation to question number 30, what case does this scenario
has been applied?
a. People v. Rapeza c. People vs. Rueras
b. People v. Arizona d. People v. Gamboa
32. Which statement is correct?
a. Article III, Section 12(1) of the Constitution states that
any confession or admission in violation of the above rights
shall be inadmissible in evidence.
b. Article III, Section 12(2) of the Constitution states that
any confession or admission in violation of the above rights
shall be inadmissible in evidence.
c. Article III, Section 12(3) of the Constitution states that
any confession or admission in violation of the above rights
shall be inadmissible in evidence.
d. Article III, Section 12(4) of the Constitution states that
any confession or admission in violation of the above rights
shall be inadmissible in evidence.
33. In relation to question number 32, the statement is
otherwise known as?
a. Inadmissibility of evidence c. Exclusionary rule
b. Exculpatory rule d. Sana all may ex rule.
34. Is defined as the direct acknowledgement of guilt.
a. Confession c. Admission
c. Plea of Guilty d. Arraignment
35. The law that pertains to the rights of the accused under
custodial investigation
a. P.D. 7438 c. R.A. 7438
b. P.D. 7843 d. R.A. 7843
36. Naggy Mas, was arrested by Patrolman Patu Col by virtue of
warrant of arrest, Patrolman Patu Col informed Naggy Mas his
constitutional right and give him a counsel because this
counsel is a relative of Patrolman Patu Col,Is patrol Patu Col
does not violate the right of the accused under custodial
investigation?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
37. In relation to question number 36, when Naggy Mas testified in his
behalf could it be used as evidence against him?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
38. Still in relation to question number 36, if Naggy Mas confesses in
front of his counsel preferably of his own choice, and it is in
writing, can it be now be admissible in court?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
39. Still in relation to question number 36, what if Naggy Mas
admitted that he is at the crime scene when the crime is committed but
his presence has no involvement of the crime, what do you call his
testimony?
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]
URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
a. Confession c. Admission
b. Guilt d. Apay siyak garud?
40. In relation to question number 39, is the statement made by Naggy
Mas a Confession?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
41. All are rights present in Miranda rights except;
a. The right to remain silent
b. The right to competent and independent counsel preferably of his
own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he
must be provided with one.
c. The right to be informed of such rights
d. None of the foregoing
42. All are rights present in Miranda rights except;
a. The right to remain silent
b. The right to competent and independent counsel preferably not of
his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel,
he must be provided with one.
c. The right to be informed of such rights
d. None of the foregoing
43. All are rights present in Miranda rights except;
a. The right not to be silent
b. The right to competent and independent counsel preferably of his
own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he
must be provided with one.
c. The right to be informed of such rights
d. None of the foregoing
44. Billy Jack Sanchy no read no write native of Zambales was arrested
by Corporal Airwin Toolfu, upon arrest, Cpl. Toolfu cited the Miranda
rights to Billy Jack Sanchy in a fluent English. Is the Miranda rights
of mr. Sanchy has been observed?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
45. In relation to question number 44, is Corporal Toolfu violates the
rights of mr. Sanchy?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
46. What right under Miranda rights has been violated?
a. The right to remain silent
b. The right to competent and independent counsel preferably of his
own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he
must be provided with one.
c. The right to be informed of such rights
d. None of the foregoing
47. What if the case of mr. Sanchy is already in court and trial
commences, can he invoke his rights under custodial investigation?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
48. What if the case of mr. Sanchy is already in Preliminary
Investigation, can he invoke his rights under custodial investigation?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]
URDANETA CITY
UNIVERSITY
Owned and operated by the City Government of Urdaneta
COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE EDUCATION
49. What if mr. Sanchy will only undergo paraffin testing, can he
invoke his right to remain silent?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
50. What if mr. sanchy was invited only by Corporal Toolfu for
questioning can his rights under R.A. 7438 be invoked by him?
a. Yes c. No
b. maybe Yes d. maybe No
Prepared by:
ROMEO M. CAPUDOY II
Instructor
Checked:
Oswaldo P. Lapeña
Deputy Program Head, CCJE
Approved:
Joseph D. Miranda, MS. Crim
Dean, College of Criminal Justice Education
(075) 600-1507
San Vicente West, Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
Bright future starts here
ucu.edu.ph | [email protected]