Transfer Pricing
Transfer Pricing
29 December 2021
Raghav Kumar Bajaj (Principal Associate) and Ujjval Gangwal (Senior Associate)
Attorney-Client Privileged Communication
Agenda
Brief overview
What is Transfer Pricing?
Transfer Pricing landscape over the last two decades
“Transfer pricing” generally refers to prices of transactions between associated enterprises which may take place under conditions
differing from those taking place between independent enterprises. It refers to the value attached to transfers of goods, services and
technology between related entities. It also refers to the value attached to transfers between unrelated parties which are controlled by a
common entity
Illustration- Suppose a company A purchases goods for INR 100 and sells it to its associated company B in another country for INR 200,
who in turn sells in the open market for INR 400. Had A sold it direct, it would have made a profit of INR 300. But by routing it through B, it
restricted it to INR 100, permitting B to appropriate the balance. The transaction between A and B is arranged and not governed by market
forces. The profit of INR 200 is, thereby, shifted to the country of B. The goods is transferred on a price (transfer price) which is
arbitrary or dictated (INR 200), but not on the market price (INR 400)
Master file +
DRP mechanism Safe harbor rules CbCR
Section 92(1): Any Income/ allowance for any expense or interest arising from an international transaction shall be computed having
regard to the arm’s length price
Associated Enterprise
International Transactions
Goods
‘Transfer Services
Price’ Intangibles
Loans
Resident
Section 92(1): Any Income/ allowance for any expense or interest arising from an international transaction shall be computed having
regard to the arm’s length price
International Transactions
Goods Arm’s
‘Transfer Services
Price’ Length
Intangibles Price
Loans
Resident Resident
Direct or indirect participation (through one or more intermediaries) in management control or capital
Direct or indirect participation (through one or more intermediaries) in management control or capital
A
A
B B D
C C E
Common Control, All three are AEs D and E are also associated enterprises of C as they share a common
ultimate parent ‘A’
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Purchase, sale, transfer, Purchase, sale, transfer, Long/short term Market Research/
lease/use of lease/use of intellectual borrowing/lending Development
property/article/produc property rights
t/thing Guarantee Technical Service
Includes Transfer of
Includes building, vehicle, ownership/ use of Purchase/Sale of Scientific Research
machinery and so on. rights/ other marketable securities
commercial rights. Legal/Accounting
Advance/receivable, Service, etc.
payments/any debt
Tangible Property Intangible Property Capital Financing Provision of Services Business Restructuring
Purchase, sale, transfer, Purchase, sale, transfer, Long/short term Market Research/ Transaction of business
lease/use of lease/use of intellectual borrowing/lending Development restructuring/
property/article/produc property rights reorganization with AE
t/thing Guarantee Technical Service irrespective of the fact
Includes Transfer of that it has bearing on
Includes building, vehicle, ownership/ use of Purchase/Sale of Scientific Research profit/ income/ losses
machinery and so on. rights/ other marketable securities or assets- at the time of
commercial rights. Legal/Accounting transaction/ at any
Advance/receivable, Service, etc. future date
payments/any debt
Any transaction with a third party (ie unrelated party) shall be deemed to be an international transaction between two associated enterprises and subject
to Indian transfer pricing regulations if:
o There exists a prior agreement between A’s AE and third party in relation to services rendered by A to the third party; or
o Terms of transaction are determined in substance by A’s AE and third party
Whether the enterprise or the associated enterprise or both of them are non-residents irrespective of whether such third party is a non resident or not
Any transaction with a third party (ie unrelated party) shall be deemed to be an international transaction between two associated enterprises and subject
to Indian transfer pricing regulations if:
o There exists a prior agreement between A’s AE and third party in relation to services rendered by A to the third party; or
o Terms of transaction are determined in substance by A’s AE and third party
Whether the enterprise or the associated enterprise or both of them are non-residents irrespective of whether such third party is a non resident or not
services
A
A’s transaction with the third party will be deemed to be an international transaction subject to Indian transfer pricing
provisions
Comparable
Uncontrolled
Price Method
Resale Price
Other Method
Method
Most appropriate
method
Transactional
Cost Plus
Net Margin
Method
Method
Profit Split
Method
Availability,
Degree of
coverage and
comparability
reliability of data
Extent to which
reliable and accurate Nature, extent and
adjustments can be reliability of
made to account for assumption required
differences
Methods used in cases involving provision of services, joint facility arrangements, transfer of semi finished goods, long term buying and
selling arrangements etc
Compares and identifies mark up earned on direct and indirect costs incurred with that of unrelated comparables
Gross margins are compared
A Inc, USA
INR 200
INR 100
Method used in case of purchase of goods or services from related parties for resale to unrelated parties without substantial value
addition
The price is reduced by the normal gross margins earned by unrelated party for same or similar products or services; and
Need for similarity of functions performed and risks undertaken
Gross margins are compared
AE (Manufacturer) in US
INR 80
Unrelated Third
A Ltd (Distributor)
Parties
INR
100
Privileged & Confidential 34 © Khaitan & Co 2021
Profit Split Method (PSM)
Splitting the combined net profit of associated enterprises arising from international transaction between respective entities based on
their relative contribution to net profits
Typical Transactions where PSM is applied:
o Interrelated, integrated transactions
PSM is contribution analysis, rather
o Transfer of unique intangibles than comparability analysis
With the introduction of Rule 10AB(2), it is possible to use “any method” which takes into account:
o the price which has been charged or paid, or
o would have been charged or paid for the same or similar uncontrolled transactions, either or between non- associated enterprises,
under similar circumstances, considering all the relevant facts.
With the introduction of Rule 10AB(2), it is possible to use “any method” which takes into account:
o the price which has been charged or paid, or
o would have been charged or paid for the same or similar uncontrolled transactions, either or between non- associated enterprises,
under similar circumstances, considering all the relevant facts.
17 to 20
Mutual
10 11 to 12 13 14 to 16
agreement/arrang 21 to 25 Domestic
Associated Tangible/Intangible Intra-group Financial
ement or business Transfer Pricing
Enterprise Property services transactions
restructuring or
others
Secondary adjustment provisions u/s 92CE are attracted under following scenarios:
o suo-moto adjustment made by taxpayer in tax return;
o Adjustment made by TPO accepted by taxpayer;
o determined in an APA;
o made as per safe harbour rules;
o MAP settlement
Section 92CE(2) requires repatriation of ‘excess money’ within prescribed time limit in certain circumstances.
In case of failure to repatriate the same, such ‘excess money’ is treated as an advance made by a taxpayer to its AE and interest on such advances will be
charged on excess money
Secondary adjustment u/s 92CE will need to be made in all cases of a primary adjustment except where:
o Primary adjustment is < INR 1 crore; or
o Primary adjustment is for AY 2016-17 and earlier years
Alternative to such repatriation of money to India: Pay additional tax at an effective rate of approx. 21% on such excess money
If not repatriated within prescribed time limit, treated as advance and interest income will be imputed on INR
100 as per prescribed rules (ie one-year marginal cost of fund lending rate of State Bank of India plus 325
Option 1 basis points in cases where international transaction is denominated in Indian rupee or six-month LIBOR plus
300 basis points in cases where international transaction is denominated in foreign currency)
Pay additional tax at an effective rate of approx. 21% on the amount on INR 100 (this is in addition to any tax
Option 2 liability arising on such adjustment at the applicable corporate tax rate) to avoid the interest income
adjustment/repatriation of INR 100 to India
Restriction on interest expenditure applicable only when below conditions are cumulatively applicable:
Threshold:
Excess of INR 10 million in relevant financial year
Payee:
Nature of interest:
a) Non-resident AE (other than PE of non-resident
AE engaged in banking) Deductible expenditure against income taxable under
b) Third party lender to whom non-resident AE has the head PGBP
provided guarantee or matching funds
Threshold
Payer: Disallowance:
a) Any Indian company except banking or insurance Payee Nature of interest a) Total interest paid/payable in excess of 30% of
company EBITDA; or
b) PE of foreign company except banking or 3 b) Interest paid/payable to AE;
insurance company which ever is less
2 4
Payer
Disallowance
1 5
Due Date 31st October following the FY 31st October following the FY
To be submitted only upon request during
assessment
Due Date 31st October following the FY 31st October following the FY 30th November following the FY
To be submitted only upon request during Designation form to be filed 30 days before
assessment
Contents Certification of Indian CA Description of ownership structure List of all group entity
Related Party Disclosure Business of Indian entity and related FAR profile; profit driver
Transaction-wise disclosure party Supply chain
Amount; TP Methodology Industry overview Description of important business restructuring
Functional and economic analysis transactions, acquisitions and divestments
TP Methodology; profitability analysis Intra-group financing
Intangible info and policy
Tax ruling; consolidated FS
Due Date 31st October following the FY 31st October following the FY 30th November following the FY CbC report- 12 months from end of
To be submitted only upon request during Designation form to be filed 30 days before reporting accounting year
assessment CbC intimation- 60 days before due
date of CbC report
Contents Certification of Indian CA Description of ownership structure List of all group entity Details of all group entity
Related Party Disclosure Business of Indian entity and related FAR profile; profit driver Jurisdiction-wise tax, income,
Transaction-wise disclosure party Supply chain assets, employees, etc
Amount; TP Methodology Industry overview Description of important business restructuring Jurisdiction-wise activity
Functional and economic analysis transactions, acquisitions and divestments information
TP Methodology; profitability analysis Intra-group financing
Intangible info and policy
Tax ruling; consolidated FS
Industry Overview
Corporate Background
Profile of related parties
Pricing Policy
Functional Analysis (‘FAR’)
Economic analysis (method
selection, comparable,
benchmarking)
Pricing Policy
Functional Analysis (‘FAR’)
Official publications, reports by
Economic analysis (method Government, institutions of repute,
selection, comparable, Stock exchanges
benchmarking) Financial statements
Functions performed
Raw material procurement Whether assets are owned or leased Financial risk
Manufacturing of products Whether activity is capital or labour intensive Product risk
Inventory management of raw materials and Presence or absence of intangibles Market risk
finished goods Are the assets unique in nature (like an Credit risk
Product research, design and development Intellectual Property) Foreign exchange risk
production planning and scheduling Capacity utilization risk
quality control
packaging and labelling of products,
Warehousing
sales and marketing
technical services
shipping of products to customers
administrative services
after sales support
Detailed functional
analysis, Selection of MAM
characterization and
selection of tested party
Quantitative analysis:
Insufficient data
Networth
Turnover
Related party transaction
Different accounting policies, and
period, etc
Privileged & Confidential 70 © Khaitan & Co 2021
Economic Analysis
Quantitative analysis:
Insufficient data
Networth
Turnover
Related party transaction
Different accounting policies, and
period, etc
Privileged & Confidential 71 © Khaitan & Co 2021
Economic Analysis
Quantitative analysis:
Insufficient data
Networth
Turnover
Related party transaction
Different accounting policies, and
period, etc
Privileged & Confidential 72 © Khaitan & Co 2021
Master File Documentation
CONTENTS
Business:
Business: Intangibles:
Business: Intangibles:
Tangible assets
other than cash & Revenue (related,
cash equivalents unrelated, total)
Availability of reliable data of the tested party and requirement of minimum adjustments is also one of the important aspects in
selection of ‘tested party’
No bar against selection. May be a local party or foreign party
The driving force in selection should be the least complex FAR of the party than the volume of comparable data
Whether TP adjustment can be made solely on the ground that need / benefit / commercial expediency from such transaction was
not proved / substantiated?
» The TPO does not enjoy unfettered powers, to disallow the expenditure or to check the necessity of the transaction
» Jurisdiction limited to ascertain whether the international transaction is at arm’s length by applying most appropriate method
Can neither question commercial expediency nor examine whether service was needed etc. Further, the TPO cannot question the quantum of
» benefit derived by the taxpayer
CBDT has introduced a notification on 19 October 2015 wherein a revised range concept has been introduced for the purpose of
01 arm’s length analysis and usage of multiple year data from FY 2014-15
02 Use of multiple year data while carrying out transfer pricing analysis is permissible
Range concept would be used for all methods (depending on the facts) except for PSM and Other Method. For PSM and Other
03 Method, only arithmetic mean concept would have to be used
Impact?
04 Range concept will be applicable only if 6 or more comparable companies are available. If not, arithmetic mean concept will
continue to be used
05 The arm’s length range will constitute of the values falling between the 35th and 65th percentile of the weighted average margins
of comparable companies
06 If the transaction price falls outside the arm’s length range, the median value of the comparable prices shall be considered as ALP
1 98
2 99
3 102
4 103
5 106
Mean of above 101.6
comparables
1 98 1 95
2 99 2 99
3 102 3 102
4 103 4 103
5 106 5 105
Mean of above 101.6 6 106
comparables
7 108
35th percentile 102
(7*0.35=2.45)
65th percentile 105
(7*0.65=4.55)
1 42 13 48.5
2 43 14 49
3 44 15 49.1
4 44.5 16 49.35
5 45 17 49.5
6 45.25 18 49.75
7 47 19 50
8 48 20 50.15
9 48.15 35th percentile (47+48)/2=47.5
(20*0.35=7)
10 48.35
65th percentile (48.5+49)/2=48.75
11 48.45 (20*0.65=13)
12 48.48
Introduced by Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 as an Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism in tax litigation
DRP panel comprise of a collegium of three Commissioners of Income Tax
Objections before the DRP to be filed in Form 35A within 30 days of receipt of draft assessment order
Eligible taxpayers who can file objections before DRP :
o Taxpayers aggrieved by an order of the transfer pricing officer under section 92CA(3)
o Non-residents, not being a company or any foreign company
Directions of the DRP binding on the assessing officer
No tax demand until assessing officer issues final assessment order post receipt of directions from DRP
Faster route to ITAT. Tax department cannot appeal against favourable DRP order.
Enabling provisions has been made in the IT Act for Faceless DRP Scheme
Types of APA:
Application for advance pricing agreement to be made APA detailed rules- Rule 10F to Rule
1) Unilateral
in Form 3CED/Form 3CEDA 10T
2) Bilateral
3) Multilateral
Statistics
Transactions
covered- Average time- 4
Royalties, IT years
services etc
Service Sectors
majority share









