Advances in Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques
Advances in Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques
Jin Bo Tang, MD
KEYWORDS
Flexor tendon Repair methods Pulley release or venting Early active motion
Secondary surgeries
KEY POINTS
Zone 2 flexor tendon repairs have evolved greatly over the past 3 decades.
The key developments in zone 2 repairs are (1) use of strong core suture, typically 4- or 6-strand
repairs, (2) venting the critical annular pulley judiciously to avoid compression to the repaired
tendon, (3) ensuring slightly tensional repair to prevent gapping at the repair site, (4) performing
a digital extension-flexion test to ascertain quality surgical repair, and (5) early partial range active
motion to ensure tendon gliding but not overloading the repair site.
I prefer direct repair of the very distal flexor tendon or in making the distal junction of the grafted
tendon. In zone 2 and proximal zone 1, I use a 6-strand repair method, the M-Tang repair, in repair-
ing the flexor tendons.
A few recent evolutions have been reported by surgeons, which hold promise to be adopted by
other hand surgeons: (1) using a strong core suture-only repair method, (2) venting the A3 together
with A4 pulleys in case of need to sacrifice clinically insignificant tendon bowstringing for gain of
range of active motion of the finger, and (3) a wide-awake surgical setting for tendon repair or te-
nolysis.
largest and strongest, and the A4 pulley over the The diameter of suture locks in the tendons—a
midpoint of the middle phalanx being the second small diameter of locks diminishes anchor
largest (Fig. 1). The annular pulleys serve to pre- power
vent tendon bowstringing during digital flexion. The suture calibers (diameter)
Although the A3 and A1 pulleys also perform this The material properties of suture materials
function, their role is less critical than the A2 and The curvature of tendon gliding paths—the
A4. Loss of integrity of any one of the pulleys alone repair strength decreases as tendon curva-
has no marked functional consequence, although ture increases
anatomically, minor tendon bowstringing occurs The holding capacity of a tendon, affected by
at the site of the loss. varying degrees of trauma and post-
The middle and distal parts of the A2 pulley (1.5– traumatic tissue softening
1.7 cm long in adult middle finger) and the A4 pul-
ley (about 0.5 cm long) are the narrowest and most It must be realized that tendon curvature during
constricting to the flexor tendons. These sites finger flexion greatly affects the repair strength. A
become compressive to the repaired tendons tendon under curvilinear tension is subjected to
because of postoperative tendon swelling. These linear pulling and bending forces. Therefore, a
narrow pulley sites may be incised to allow the repair in a tendon under a curvilinear load is
repaired tendons to glide more freely. weaker than that under a linear load; the repair
Several factors affect the strength of repaired strength decreases progressively as the curvature
tendon: increases.18,19 Therefore, the repair fails more
easily in the flexed finger, and when the finger
The number of suture strands across the repair moves to approach full flexion, a bent tendon is
sites—strength is roughly proportional to the particularly prone to fail. This is the mechanical ba-
number of core sutures sis of current partial active finger flexion protocols
The tension of repairs—most relevant to gap for- and 1 reason why a full fist should be avoided in
mation and stiffness of repairs the initial a few weeks after surgery (Table 1).
The core suture purchase Fig. 2 summarizes the breakdown of contribu-
The types of tendon-suture junction—locking or tors of postoperative resistance to tendon
grasping gliding20 that should be considered in planning
Fig. 1. Locations of the annular and cruciate pulleys of the fingers and the subdivisions of zone 1 and 2.
Flexor Tendon Injuries 297
Table 1
of injury or a few days later. Primary repair indi-
Resistance to tendon gliding during active cates the end-to-end repair performed within
finger flexion in initial weeks of tendon 24 hours after tendon injury. When an experienced
healing surgeon is not available on the day of injury, the
repair can be deliberately delayed, and delayed
Resistance Healing Tendons primary repair is performed in a selective surgical
Active to Tendon during Active setting. The delay usually has no adverse effects
Flexion Gliding Motion on outcomes, but in this period of delay, antibiotic
None to Low Not easily use reduces the risk of infection of the wound.
mild disrupted Delayed primary repair is the repair performed
Mild to Low or Not easily within 3 or even 4 weeks after injury. The end-to-
moderate moderately disrupted end repair is often still possible 5 weeks after
high injury.
Moderate Very high Easy to disrupt; Zone 2 is the most complex and demanding and
to full should avoid will be highlighted in the following section.
such motion
Exposure and Finding Tendon Ends in Zone 2
and adjusting the active motion protocols. The The tendons are exposed through a Bruner skin
safety margin of early active digital flexion can be incision of 1.5 to 2 cm (Fig. 3), which is usually suf-
enhanced by a strong surgical tendon repair or ficient to expose the tendons. The author and col-
appropriately decompressing the tendon during leagues keep the skin incision as limited as
surgery through releasing restricting pulleys, possible to decrease edema of the digit and resis-
limiting the lengths of skin incisions, and mini- tance to tendon gliding after surgery. Retraction of
mizing the trauma to the tendon and sheath. After the proximal tendon stump is common, especially
surgery, delicate adjustments in early active in delayed primary repair. If the proximal flexor dig-
flexion to fit individual patients by a therapist or itorum profundus (FDP) tendon end has not
surgeon is also important. retracted far proximally, flexion of the metacarpo-
phalangeal (MCP) or proximal interphalangeal
PRIMARY AND DELAYED PRIMARY REPAIR (PIP) joints can bring the proximal end into the inci-
sion site.
Nowadays most lacerated flexor tendons in the If the proximal FDP tendon end retracts to the
hand and forearm are repaired on the same day palm, I do not extend the incision to the palm,
Fig. 2. The breakdown of contributors of postoperative resistance to tendon gliding. (A) Percentage contribution
to the resistance. (B) Contributing factors. (From Wu YF, Tang JB. Tendon healing, edema, and resistance to flexor
tendon gliding: clinical implications. Hand Clin 2013;29:167–78; with permission.)
298 Tang
Fig. 4. Pushing the retracted FDP tendon with 2 forceps through a distal palm incision.
Flexor Tendon Injuries 299
is at great risk of rupture if the suture purchase is that results in 10% to 20% shortening of the
short. tendon parts encompassed by core sutures, or a
The second key in the repair is that certain ten- 20% to 30% increase in the diameter of junction
sion across repair site should be maintained. To site of the 2 tendon ends (Fig. 7).22 A small amount
prevent gapping, it is important to ensure the of baseline tension would counteract the tension
repair has tension or a certain degree of bulkiness of the flexor muscles during resting or active mo-
tion. The repair site becomes more flattened
once it is under the load of active digital flexion.
Such degrees of bulkiness do not hamper tendon
gliding with proper pulley venting.
before active digital flexion. Then active digital MORE RECENT EVOLUTION OF METHODS
flexion should proceed gradually. In the first 3 to
4 weeks, only one-half to two-thirds active motion The major conceptual changes in repairing flexor
range should be the goal. Extreme digital flexion tendons are summarized in Table 2. Although
should be avoided, because marked finger flexion most of the advancements have already been dis-
would overload the repaired tendons, risking cussed, here I summarize the changes over the
repair disruption (Fig. 8). Most patients have last 5 to 6 years.
marked swelling at this time; a full range of active
motion of the operated finger is difficult to achieve. Placing the Knots Between the Two Tendon
Aiming for full active flexion of the finger is both un- Ends May Not Favor the Repair
necessary and unrealistic. However, full passive The modified Kessler repair was popular, but for
finger flexion and extension should always be per- zone 2 flexor tendon repair, this repair is now
formed to make the hand and finger as supple as seldom used. It has also been realized that the orig-
possible. inal Kessler repair with knots over the tendon sur-
From the end of week 3 or 4, a full range of face is actually slightly better than the modified
active flexion is the goal. Some patients who version in terms of preventing gapping.26 Most cur-
have difficulty with full active flexion at week 4 or rent multistrand repairs have knots over the tendon
5 may gradually achieve full flexion in later weeks. surface, and no adverse clinical consequences
However, exercise to reduce joint stiffness and have been noted with these repairs (Fig. 9). It is
prevent extension lag should always be performed now believed that placement of the knots between
for eventual recovery of active finger flexion. The tendon ends is not beneficial or unimportant.26–28
splint protection can be removed at the end of
week 5 or 6, but therapy usually should persist
for a few weeks to get rid of often seen remaining Asymmetric Suture Configurations May be
stiffness of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, Preferable to Symmetric Designs
with or with nighttime splint protection. After Recent investigations have revealed that asym-
week 6, I sometimes urge patients to wear a splint metry in the configuration of sutures attaching
only when they go outside, which prevents unin- 2 tendon stumps is better than symmetric suture
tentional use or injury. placement.29,30 Asymmetric placement likely
A B
Fig. 8. Partial range active motion in the initial 2 to 3 weeks after surgery. Full fist or marked active finger flexion
should be avoided to prevent repair rupture. (A) Active flexion starts from full extension. (B) Active flexion upto
two-thirds of flexion arc is shown.
302 Tang
Table 2
The major conceptual changes in repairing flexor tendons over the past 3 decades
favors gap resistance, and this design can be proposed originally, in particular, if such a release
found in some popular suture configurations. greatly favors gliding of the repaired tendon, and
the bowstringing caused by slightly extended
A Tensioned Slightly Bunched Repair is Better release is noticeable but still mild. This practice
Than a Flat Tension-Free Repair appears especially beneficial at the PIP joint
A flat, tension-free repair should be avoided. A area. Such extended release from the A4 to A3
tensioned slightly bunched repair favors gap resis- pulleys (including the sheath between them), if
tance and does not hamper tendon gliding as the needed, may favor tendon gliding at the cost of
narrow pulleys are released. mild bowstringing at the PIP joint, which actually
does not affect normal function of the
Slightly Extended Pulley Venting to Benefit finger.23,24,31–34
Finger Flexion Outweighs the Drawbacks of
Minor Tendon Bowstringing Peripheral Suture is Unnecessary When a
Strong Core Suture (a 6-Strand Repair) is Used
The author and colleagues tend to be conservative
in deciding the length of pulley release. The allow- This is a recent observation. A few surgeons have
able length may be slightly longer than what was reported not adding peripheral sutures when a
Fig. 9. A tendon repair showing most of the recognized points for making a reliable repair: sufficient lengths of
suture purchase, no knots between the tendon ends, tension across repair site, slightly bunching up at the junc-
tion of the 2 tendon ends, and asymmetry of the suture strands in 2 tendon ends.
Flexor Tendon Injuries 303
A B
Fig. 10. (A) The method of a strong direct repair for repairing the tendon cut at or close to tendon-bone insertion
of the finger. (B) An operative picture of this repair.
Although I follow established methods and princi- Direct repair of the terminal FDP tendon or in
ples for these procedures, I use direct repair of the making the distal junction of the grafted tendon
grafted tendon to the residual stump of the distal is my preference. A few recent changes reported
FDP tendon when making a distal junction. For by surgeons hold the promise of wider adoption:
that purpose, I retain the distal stump for 1 cm
Using strong core-suture-only repair
(or slightly less) when removing the FDP tendons.
Venting the A3 together with A4 pulleys if greater
Starting the end of week 1 after surgery, I instruct
range of motion of the finger is needed
the patients to perform a full range of passive mo-
Using a wide-awake setting for tendon repair,
tion and less-aggressive active flexion of the finger
including grafting
that underwent surgery.
Fig. 11. The M-Tang repair for an FPL tendon cut. (A) After completion of repair, before taking the temporary
needle fixation away, the tendon is seen slightly bunched up. (B) After the needle fixation is taken away, the
tendon is flatter. No gapping was seen at thumb extension.
Flexor Tendon Injuries 305
REFERENCES 20. Wu YF, Tang JB. Tendon healing, edema, and resis-
tance to flexor tendon gliding: clinical implications.
1. Tang JB. New developments are improving flexor Hand Clin 2013;29:167–78.
tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141: 21. Tang JB, Amadio PC, Boyer MI, et al. Current
1427–37. practice of primary flexor tendon repair: a global
2. Giesen T, Calcagni M, Elliot D. Primary flexor tendon view. Hand Clin 2013;29:179–89.
repair with early active motion: experience in Eu- 22. Tang JB, Zhou X, Pan ZJ, et al. Strong digital flexor
rope. Hand Clin 2017;33:465–72. tendon repair, extension-flexion test, and early
3. Wong JK, Peck F. Improving results of flexor tendon active flexion: experience in 300 tendons. Hand
repair and rehabilitation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; Clin 2017;33:455–63.
134:913e–25e. 23. Giesen T, Sirotakova M, Copsey AJ, et al. Flexor pol-
4. Elliot D, Giesen T. Primary flexor tendon surgery: the licis longus primary repair: further experience with
search for a perfect result. Hand Clin 2013;29:191–206. the Tang technique and controlled active mobiliza-
5. Tang JB. Recent evolutions in flexor tendon repairs tion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009;34:758–61.
and rehabilitation. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43: 24. Giesen T, Reissner L, Besmens I, et al. Flexor tendon
469–73. repair in the hand with the M-Tang technique
6. Wu YF, Tang JB. Recent developments in flexor (without peripheral sutures), pulley division, and
tendon repair techniques and factors influencing early active motion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43:
strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 474–9.
2014;39:6–19. 25. Tang JB. Wide-awake primary flexor tendon repair,
7. Wu YF, Tang JB. Effects of tension across the tendon tenolysis and tendon transfer. Clin Orthop Surg
repair site on tendon gap and ultimate strength. 2015;7:275–81.
J Hand Surg Am 2012;37:906–12. 26. Chang MK, Wong YR, Tay SC. Biomechanical com-
8. Savage R. In vitro studies of a new method of flexor parison of modified Lim/Tsai tendon repairs with
tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br 1985;10:135–41. intra- and extra-tendinous knots. J Hand Surg Eur
9. Tang JB. The double sheath system and tendon Vol 2018;43:919–24.
gliding in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Br 1995;20:281–5. 27. Chang MK, Wong YR, Tay SC. Biomechanical com-
10. Lalonde DH. Conceptual origins, current practice, parison of the Lim/Tsai tendon repair with a modified
and views of wide awake hand surgery. J Hand method using a single looped suture. J Hand Surg
Surg Eur Vol 2017;42:886–95. Eur Vol 2017;42:915–9.
11. Lalonde DH, Martin AL. Wide-awake flexor tendon 28. Chen J, Wu YF, Xing SG, et al. Suture knots between
repair and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 tendon stumps may not benefit tendon repairs.
and 2. Hand Clin 2013;29:207–13. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018;43:1005–6.
12. Tang JB. Clinical outcomes associated with flexor 29. Wu YF, Tang JB. The effect of asymmetric core su-
tendon repair. Hand Clin 2005;21:199–210. ture purchase on gap resistance of tendon repair
13. Tang JB. Indications, methods, postoperative mo- in linear cyclic loading. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:
tion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon 910–8.
repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007;32: 30. Kozono N, Okada T, Takeuchi N, et al.
118–29. A biomechanical comparison between asymmetric
14. Tang JB. Outcomes and evaluation of flexor tendon Pennington technique and conventional core suture
repair. Hand Clin 2013;29:251–9. techniques: 6-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand
15. Kwai Ben I, Elliot D. “Venting” or partial lateral Surg Am 2018;43:79.e1–8.
release of the A2 and A4 pulleys after repair of 31. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Tsubokawa N, et al. Outcomes
zone 2 flexor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg Br of release of the entire A4 pulley after flexor tendon
1998;23:649–54. repairs in zone 2A followed by early active mobiliza-
16. Tang JB. Release of the A4 pulley to facilitate zone II tion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016;41:400–5.
flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39: 32. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Tsubokawa N, et al. Clinical re-
2300–7. sults of releasing the entire A2 pulley after flexor
17. Howell JW, Peck F. Rehabilitation of flexor and tendon repair in zone 2C. J Hand Surg Eur Vol
extensor tendon injuries in the hand: current up- 2016;41:822–8.
dates. Injury 2013;44:397–402. 33. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Tsubokawa N, et al. Outcomes
18. Tang JB, Xu Y, Wang B. Repair strength of tendons of flexor tendon repairs in zone 2 subzones with
of varying gliding curvature: a study in a curvilinear early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Eur Vol
model. J Hand Surg Am 2003;28:243–9. 2017;42:896–902.
19. Tang JB, Cao Y, Xie RG. Effects of tension direction 34. Reissner L, Zechmann-Mueller N, Klein HJ, et al.
on strength of tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 2001; Sonographic study of repair, gapping and tendon
26:1105–10. bowstringing after primary flexor digitorum
306 Tang
profundus repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur Vol tendon repair in 54 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol
2018;43:480–6. 2017;42:462–8.
35. Lalonde DH. Wide-awake flexor tendon repair. Plast 39. Pan ZJ, Xu YF, Pan L, et al. Zone 2 flexor tendon re-
Reconstr Surg 2009;123:623–5. pairs using a tensioned strong core suture, sparse
peripheral stitches and early active motion: results
36. Higgins A, Lalonde DH, Bell M, et al. Avoiding flexor
in 60 fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019;44:361–6.
tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active
40. Moriya K, Yoshizu T, Tsubokawa N, et al. Incidence
movement examination. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;
of tenolysis and features of adhesions in the digital
126:941–5.
flexor tendons after multi-strand repair and early
37. Tang JB, Gong KT, Zhu L, et al. Performing hand sur- active motion. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019;44:354–60.
gery under local anesthesia without a tourniquet in 41. Pan ZJ, Qin J, Zhou X, et al. Robust thumb flexor
China. Hand Clin 2017;33:415–24. tendon repairs with a six-strand M-Tang method,
38. Zhou X, Li XR, Qing J, et al. Outcomes of the six- pulley venting, and early active motion. J Hand
strand M-Tang repair for zone 2 primary flexor Surg Eur Vol 2017;42:909–14.