Scribd
Upload
70 views1 page

Atty. Doronilla's Misconduct Ruling

Renato Maligaya filed a complaint against lawyer Antonio Doronilla with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines Commission on Bar Discipline, accusing Doronilla of misleading the court through misrepresenting facts. Doronilla admitted to the investigating commissioner that there was no agreement for Maligaya to withdraw his lawsuits, contrary to what Doronilla had stated in court. The issue was whether Doronilla was guilty of purposely stating a falsehood. The ruling was yes, as lawyers have a duty as officers of the court to act with truth and honesty. Therefore, Doronilla was suspended from practicing law for two months for violating the Code of Professional Responsibility and a lawyer's oath to not make false

Uploaded by

Eula
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views1 page

Atty. Doronilla's Misconduct Ruling

Renato Maligaya filed a complaint against lawyer Antonio Doronilla with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines Commission on Bar Discipline, accusing Doronilla of misleading the court through misrepresenting facts. Doronilla admitted to the investigating commissioner that there was no agreement for Maligaya to withdraw his lawsuits, contrary to what Doronilla had stated in court. The issue was whether Doronilla was guilty of purposely stating a falsehood. The ruling was yes, as lawyers have a duty as officers of the court to act with truth and honesty. Therefore, Doronilla was suspended from practicing law for two months for violating the Code of Professional Responsibility and a lawyer's oath to not make false

Uploaded by

Eula
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

A.C. No.

6198             September 15, 2006

RENATO M. MALIGAYA, complainant, 
vs.
ATTY. ANTONIO G. DORONILLA, JR., respondent.

FACTS:

Maligaya filed a complaint against Atty. Doronilla in the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission
on Bar Discipline. The complaint, which charged Atty. Doronilla with "misleading the court through
misrepresentation of facts resulting [in] obstruction of justice," was referred to a commissioner for
investigation. Maligaya swore before the investigating commissioner that he had never entered into any
agreement to withdraw his lawsuits. Atty. Doronilla, who took up the larger part of two hearings to present
evidence and explain his side, admitted several times that there was, in fact, no such agreement. Later he
explained in his memorandum that his main concern was "to settle the case amicably among comrades in
arms without going to trial" and insisted that there was no proof of his having violated the Code of
Professional Responsibility or the lawyer's oath. He pointed out, in addition, that his false statement (or, as
he put it, his "alleged acts of falsity") had no effect on the continuance of the case and therefore caused no
actual prejudice to complainant.

ISSUE:

Whether Atty. Doronilla guilty of purposely stating a falsehood in violation of Canon 10.

RULING:

Yes.

There is a strong public interest involved in requiring lawyers who, as officers of the court, participate in
the dispensation of justice, to behave at all times in a manner consistent with truth and honor. The
common caricature that lawyers by and large do not feel compelled to speak the truth and to act honestly
should not become a common reality. To this end, Canon 10 and Rule 10.01 of the Code of Professional
Responsibility state:

CANON 10 – A LAWYER OWES CANDOR, FAIRNESS, AND GOOD FAITH TO THE COURT.

Rule 10.01 – A lawyer shall not do any falsehood, nor consent to the doing of any in court; nor shall he
mislead, or allow the Court to be misled by any artifice.

By stating untruthfully in open court that complainant had agreed to withdraw his lawsuits, Atty. Doronilla
breached these peremptory tenets of ethical conduct. Not only that, he violated the lawyer's oath to "do no
falsehood, nor consent to the doing of any in court," of which Canon 10 and Rule 10.01 are but
restatements. His act infringed on every lawyer's duty to "never seek to mislead the judge or any judicial
officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law."

WHEREFORE, Atty. Antonio G. Doronilla, Jr. is hereby SUSPENDED from the practice of law for TWO
MONTHS.

https://www.scribd.com/document/360289098/Maligaya-vs-Atty-Donorilla-Canon-10-docx#download

You might also like