Strategic Objectives & KPIs
Strategic Objectives & KPIs
PANARUB INDUSTRY
SASARAN STRATEGIS (STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE) & KPI 2012
Scorecard
Periode
Main / Bobot Score if Achive Freq.
Perspectives No. Sasaran Strategis No. KPI Variance Rating Polarisasi Definisi Formula UoM Accumulat
Internal Percentage Target Update
ion
Financial
how do we perform
according to our
shareholder?
Customer
A. External
how do our customers (adidas)
see us?
B. Internal
Internal
how should we excel in ?
……name.…. ……name.…. = Fully cascaded, tetapi data diambil dari dept, dengan bagian yang diberi tanda ungu adalah yg merupakan penanggung jawab
data & PILOT dari KPI
…..position….. …..position…..
CASCADING
Baseline
PROD
Stretch Budget (excl.
Target Target 2013 Pilot Co-Pilot CORP. ENG RUB QIP DEV MKT LOG HR CI AMA IT ACC FIN
2011 Ytd Sep'12 Ytd Dec'12 Target 2013 2013 Ruber
2012 Plant)
RATE - 1 $ : Rp 9,400
DL
OH
High High
QLT
Low Low
Initiatives
Strategis Initiative
Impact Complexity of
(on Financial, Effort
Financial Impact Category Customer and (Cost, Cross
Key Issue No. Initiatives (Projects) Deliverables Project Leader Start ETC Investment ($)
($) Impact Competitive Functionality, Priority
advantage) Time & Effort)
High Low I
High High II
Low High IV
High Low I
High Low I
Low Low III
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PT. PANARUB DWIKARYA CIKUPA
SASARAN STRATEGIS (STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE) & KPI 2017
Update : 1 Desember 2016
SAVE
DENG
AN
FILE
Bobot Polarisas NAME Target
Perspectives No. Sasaran Strategis (SS) KPI
IPC i
UoM
2017
Jan Feb Maret Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Ytd 2017 January Action Plan
:
NO.
URUT.
NAM
FIN 10% F1 Reduce OH Cost of QA OH Cost QA 10% ê
A IDR TBA 1,951.44 1,951.44 1,951.44
FACT
ORY - UA Defect : Underpacked carton, delamination outsole to
CUST 40% Comply with all buyer standard 20% é NAM % 98.00% 61.50% 61.50% 61.50% midsole
A - Mizuno defect : Morelia AS (Insole Bumpy)
DEPT
- - Qty RA Audit = 4 PO, Qty Pass RA Audit = 2 PO
Pass Rate Audit 10% é Sum % 96.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% - Qty FA Audit = 0 PO, Qty Pass FA Audit = 0 PO
mary - Defect : Underpacked carton, delamination outsole to midsole
sasara
n
Grade OEM (Original Equipment
10% é strate
% 100.00% 73.00% 73.00% 73.00%
- % Defective ratio of Final inspection by MHL diatas target
Manufacturing) gis - Fatal defect in production : 1 case (Morelia AS : Bumpy Insole)
2017
conto
C1 Excellent SCP Quality h:
Cost of Quality Claims 10% ê 01.% 0.025% 1.33% 1.33% 1.33% Empower (Reject Printing peel off)
PRB
PROD
Cost of Quality Claims Mizuno ê - % 2.38% 2.38% 2.38% Empower (Reject Printing peel off)
Sum
mary
sasara
Cost of Quality Claims UA ê n % 0% 0.00% 0.00%
strate
gis
2017
Cost of Quality Claims Specs ê % 0% 0.00% 0.00%
I2 Effective Process Control Return accesoris = 1200 pairs, di model UA Hammer Phantom
% In AQR UA ê % 1.47% 1.47% 1.47% (lebar shoe lace tidak standart, std = 6 mm, act = 5 mm). Aktual
return = 430 pairs
- Weekly evaluasi performance subcont
Return subcont = 4050 pairs, di model swervo thunder bolt - Supplier akan menambah QC Roving ( 1 QC Roving
% In AQR Specs ê % 2.33% 2.33% 2.33% (defect lecet), Barricada Patriot, Valor FG & Acc Fury in (defect check maksimal 3 meja printing dan akan training job disk
meleber), Horus Fg (defect peel off). Aktual return = 8 pairs QC Roving)
- Improve T3 Capability
PT LBI : C-Grade diatas target Weekly evaluasi performance subcont dan Project T3
Subcont Quality Performance 13% é % 85.00% 72.87% 72.87% 72.87%
PT Masterina : C-Grade dan Devective Return diatas target Capability
Tingkat C-Grade diatas target. Top defect C-Grade : Bekas lap Weekly evaluasi performance subcont dan Project T3
Subcont Quality Performance LBI é % 64.80% 64.80% 64.80%
Improve Subcont Supplier (916 pairs), terbakar (856 pairs) & meleber (453.5 pairs) Capability
I3
Quality Peformance
Panarub Lean System (PLS) Audit Score 3% é Index 85.00% n/a n/a n/a
L&G 10%
1. Melakukan perubahan matrix pada Lab test Brand UA
L2 Enhance Lean Culture # of Kaizen Idea Submit 3% é % 12 1 1 1 Tujuan : Mengurangi biaya pemakaian listrik & pemakaian
komponen sepatu
1. Melakukan perubahan matrix pada Lab test Brand UA
# of Kaizen Project Completion 1% é Index 4 1 1 1 Tujuan : Mengurangi biaya pemakaian listrik & pemakaian
komponen sepatu
100% 100%
PT. Panarub Dwikarya Cikupa STRATEGY INITIATIVES PROGRESS MONITORING
Division : QA
Update : xxxxx
digunakan utk MENTRACKING PROGRESS PROJECT => PLANNING ACTUAL Project Score
UPDATE PER BULAN
Financial Impact Process Owner End
No. Project ID Strategic Initiatives (Project) SS / KPI Target Project (Target) Champion (Div./Dept.) Project Leader Start End (1st) (Last) Start Progress Januari Progress Februari End Jan Feb Mar Q1 Apr May Jun Q2 Jul Aug Sep Q3 Oct Nov Dec Q4 Remarks
suggest : QPR?
a. Improve Grading level Supplier (7 priority supplier) Self Assessment dari Supplier dan
Sudah Audit 3 Supplier (HSK, SFT,
1 IPC/QIP/SSC/2017/01 Strengthen Quality System at T2 (Flow Process, Method Inspection and Problem Solving) I2.2 % In Accuracy Quality Feeding to CTB b. Reduce Top issue material claim - Nicko Vizano Sintya Sintya Jan'17 May'17 Dec'16 waiting action plan untuk findings Self 60% 60%
SUJA) dari 7 supplier
c. Reduce NSP karena issue material sebesar 60% Assessment
- Training skill
2 IPC/QIP/PDE/2017/02 Set up Multi skill QIP Incoming I1.1 Final Inspection Rejection Rate Improve capability QC Incoming sebesar 80% Andri Darmaji Rachma Wiwik Jan'17 May'17 Jan'17 Mapping matrix multi skill 60% 60%
- Update Matrix skill Bulan Januari
a. Achieve 100% ontime inspection 1 days after - Evaluasi data current system Implementasi System Management
4 IPC/QIP/SSC/2017/04 Improve System Inspection Management C2.1 On Time Final Random Inspection Cucu Ratih Andri Darmaji Subhana Feb'17 Apr'17 Feb'17 60% 60%
inspection proposal is submitted from MKT inspection Inspection yang sudah di improve
352,731,415