SAN BEDA UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE OF LAW
COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE CODE:

COURSE TITLE: LABOR RELATIONS

COURSE CREDIT: 3 UNITS

COURSE PREREQUISITE/S: N/A

FACULTY: [Insert Name of Professor]

EMAIL ADDRESS: [Insert San Beda Email Address]

TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: FIRST SEMESTER SCHOOL YEAR 2020-2021

DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION:

COURSE DELIVERY MODE: FULL ONLINE

CONSULTATION DAY/TIME:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A survey of the laws implementing the rights to self-organization and collective

bargaining, including the laws relating to strikes, pickets, and lock outs.

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (“ELGAs”)

(A) Know and understand the laws; (B) Memorize provisions; (C) Develop: (i)
critical and analytical thinking; (ii) proficiency in written and oral communication;
and (iii) logical reasoning and sound judgment; and (D) Exercise proper
professional and ethical responsibilities

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (“LOs”):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize

Upon completion of the Course Title course, the student is expected to be able to:

ELGAs LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)

Critical and LO1. Explain the pertinent labor relations provisions and apply
analytical thinking these to specific factual situations.
Effective in written LO2. Analyze the assigned cases and derive the applicable
and oral doctrines enunciated therein.
communication

1
 Logical reasoning LO4. Utilize legal research tools to gather pieces of information
Sound judgment that aid in the analysis of legal issues in drafting a research paper
Exercise of proper
professional and
ethical
responsibilities

ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:

The student will be graded according to the following:

Percentage
Scope of (Weight is
Requirements Based on the Learning Outcomes
Work based on the
(“LO”)
(Individual) importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and Discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - Research Paper, Case Study

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100%

LEARNING PLAN:

LEARNING
WEEK/ METHODS
LEARNING
DATE (activities
RESOURCES
(Schedule designed or
(print and
TOPIC/CONTENT of each deployed by
non-print
(arrangement or sequence of the major topics is Topic, the teacher
materials and
based on a logical order) Assign, to bring
online/
Exam for about, or
open-access
the entire create the
resources)
semester) conditions
for learning)

Course Introduction
• Course overview Syllabus 10 Aug. Lecture
• Course assignments 2020
• Course requirements Discussion

2
 MODULE 1: JURISDICTION 10 Aug. to Recitation
Syllabus 15 Aug.
A. Existence of an employer-employee 2020 Case Study
relationship as essential requisite for Textbooks
jurisdiction Discussion
Supreme
Javier v. Fly Ace, G.R. No. 192558, 15 Court
February 2012. Decisions
South East International Rattan v. Coming,
G.R. No. 186621, 12 March 2014

Tenazas v. R. Villegas Taxi Transport, G.R.

No. 192998, 2 April 2014

Sagun v. ANZ Global, G.R. No. 220399, 22

August 2016

LVN Pictures Inc. v. Phil. Musicians Guild

(110 Phil. 725)

Paguio Transport Corporation v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 119500, 28 August 1998.

Teng v. Pahagac, G.R. No. 169704, 17

November 2010.

Dy Keh Beng v. International Labor, L-32245,

25 May 1979.

Insular Life Assurance Co. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

84484, 15 November 1989.

Tongko v. Manufacturer’s Life Insurance

Company, G.R. No. 167622, 29 June 2010
(See also: 25 January 2011 Resolution)

AFP Mutual Benefit Association v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 102199, 28 January 1997.

Encyclopaedia Britannica v. NLRC, G.R. No.

87098, 4 November 1996

HSY Marketing v. Villastique, G.R. No.

219569, 17 August 2016

Coca Cola v. Climaco, G.R. No. 146881, 5

February 2007

Corporal v. NLRC, G.R. No. 129315, 2

October 2000, 341 SCRA 658.

Maraguinot v. NLRC, G.R. No. 120969, 22

January 1998, 284 SCRA 539.

Calamba Medical Center v. NLRC, G.R. No.

176484, 25 November 2008.

3
 Jardin v. NLRC, G.R. No. 119268, 23
February 2000, 326 SCRA 299.

Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation,

G.R. No. 138051, 10 June 2004.

Begino v. ABS-CBN, G.R. No. 199166, 20

April 2015.

Orozco v. Court of Appeal, G.R. No. 155207,

13 August 2008.

Television And Production Exponents, Inc. v.

Servaña, G.R. No. 167648, 28 January 2008.

Francisco v. NLRC, G.R. No. 170087, 31

August 2006.

WPP Marketing Communications, Inc. et al. v.

Galera, G.R. No. 169207/G.R. No. 169239,
25 March 2010.

Matling Industrial v. Coros, G.R. No. 157802,

13 October 2010.

Malcaba v. Prohealth Pharma Philippines, G.R.

No. 209085, 6 June 2018.

Republic v. Asiapro Cooperative, G.R. No.

172101, 23 November 2007.

Pasay City Alliance Church v. Benito, G.R.

No. 226908, 28 November 2019

B. Reasonable Causal Connection Rule

San Miguel Corporation v. Etcuban, G.R. No.
127639, 3 December 1999

Kawachi v. Del Quero, G.R. No. 163768, 27

March 2007

Eviota v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 152121,

29 July 2003

Indophil Textile Mills v. Adviento, G.R. No.

171212, 4 August 2014

C. Mandatory Conciliation and Mediation as

Prerequisite for Exercise of Jurisdiction (RA
10396 and DO 151-16)

4
 MODULE 2: JURISDICTION AND
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE LABOR
ARBITER

1. Labor dispute, defined. (Art. 219, LC)

San Miguel Corporation Employees Union v.

Bersamira, G.R. No. 87700, 13 June 1990

Citibank v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108961,

27 November 1998

Philippine Airlines v. NLRC, G.R. No.

120567, 20 March 1998

2. Jurisdiction (Arts. 124, 128(b), 233, and 276)

a. Original and exclusive jurisdiction

Pondoc v. NLRC, G.R. No. 116347, 3

October 1996

Villamaria v. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 165881, 19 April 2006 Syllabus
i. Exceptions Recitation
Textbooks 17 Aug. to
1. Art. 278 (g) 29 Aug. Case Study
Supreme 2020
2. Art. 224 (c) in relation Court Discussion
to Art. 273-275 Decisions
San Jose v. NLRC, G.R.
No. 121227, 17 August
1998

Del Monte v. Saldivar,

G.R. No. 158620, 11
October 2006

7K Corporation v.
Albarico, G.R. No.
182295, 26 June 2013.

b. Unfair Labor Practices (Art. 258 – 260,

274, 278 (c)

Mendoza v. Officers of Manila Water

Employees Union, G.R. No. 201595, 25
January 2016.

c. Termination dispute

Atlas Fams v. NLRC, G.R. No. 142244,

18 November 2002

5
 Negros Metal v. Lamayo, G.R. No.
186557, 25 August 2010

Vivero v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

138938, 24 October 2000

University of Immaculate Conception v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 181146, 26 January
2011

Austria v. NLRC, G.R. No. 124382, 16

August 1992

Reyes v. RTC Makati, G.R. No. 165744,

11 August 2008

Locsin v. Nissan Lease Philippines, G.R.

No. 185567, 20 October 2010

Wesleyan University v. Maglaya, G.R.

No. 212774, 23 January 2017

Cacho v. Balagtas, G.R. No. 202974, 7

February 2018

d. Monetary claims

i. Money claims accompanied by

prayer for reinstatement

ii. Money claims without

reinstatement and in excess of
PhP5,000.00

iii. Damages

Paredes v. Feed the Children

Philippines, G.R. No. 184397, 9
September 2015

Lunzaga v. Albar Shipping, G.R.

No. 200476, 18 April 2012

Santos v. Servier, G.R. No. 166377,

28 November 2008

World’s Best Gas v. Vital, G.R. No.

211588, 9 September 2015

Halagueña v. Philippine Airlines,

G.R. No. 172013, 2 October 2009

Pepsi Cola v. Gal-lang, G.R. No.

89621, 24 September 1991

Bañez v. Valdevilla, G.R. No.

128024, 9 May 2000

6
 Milan v. NLRC, G.R. No. 202961, 4
February 2015

Amecos Innovations v. Lopez, G.R.

No. 178055, 2 July 2014

Philippine Airlines v. Airline Pilots

Association of the Philippines, G.R.
No. 200088, 26 February 2018

Dai-chi Electronics v. Villarama,

G.R. No. 112940, 21 November
1994

Gemudiano v. Naess Shipping, G.R.

No. 223825, 20 January 2020

e. Legality of strikes and lockouts

i. Exceptions

f. Legislated wage increases and wage

distortion

g. In relation to DOLE jurisdiction under

128 and 129.

Ex-Bataan Veterans Security

Agency v. Secretary of Labor, G.R.
No. 152396, 20 November 2007

People’s Broadcasting (Bombo

Radyo Phils., Inc.) v. Secretary of
Labor, G.R. No. 179652, 8 May
2009 compare with Resolution
dated 6 March 2012

Meteoro v. Creative Creatures, G.R.

No. 171275, 13 July 2009

h. Enforcement or annulment of
compromise agreements (Art. 233)

i. Execution and enforcement of

voluntary arbitrator’s decision (Art 276)

j. Cases involving Overseas Filipino

Workers (See RA 8042, as amended)

Santiago v. CF Sharp Crew

Management, G.R. No. 162419, 10
July 2007

Industrial Personnel and

Management Services v. De Vera,
G.R. No. 205703, 7 March 2016

7
 Ace Navigation v. Fernandez, G.R.
No. 197309, 10 October 2012

Estate of Nelson Dulay v. Aboitiz

Jebsen Maritime, G.R. No. 172642,
13 June 2012

k. In relation to GOCC’s

Light Rail Transit Authority v.

Alvarez, G.R. No. 188047, 28
November 2016

GSIS v. NLRC, G.R. No. 180045, 17

November 2010

Duty Free Philippines v. Mojica,

G.R. No. 166365, 30 September
2005

l. Cases with a foreign element

WPP Marketing Communications v.

Galera, G.R. No. 169207, 25 March
2010

Pakistan International Airlines v.

Ople, G.R. No. 61594, 28
September 1990.

Philippine National Bank v.

Cabansag, G.R. No. 157010, 21
June 2005

Manila Hotel v. NLRC, G.R. No.

120077, 13 October 2000

Saudi Arabian Airlines v.

Rebesencio, G.R. No. 198587, 14
January 2015

m. In relation to entities with immunity

Department of Foreign Affairs v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 113191, 18
September 1996

Lasco v. United Nations Revolving

Fund, G.R. No. 109095, 23
February 1995

US v. Guinto, G.R. No. 76607, 26

February 1990

n. In relation to cooperatives

8
 Perpetual Help Credit Cooperative v.
Faburada, G.R. No. 121948, 8
October 2001

San Miguel v. Semillano, G.R. No.

164257, 5 July 2010

Ellao v. Batangas I Electric

Cooperative, G.R. No. 209166, 9
July 2018

Proceedings Before the Labor Arbiter

1. Construction of the Rules and suppletory

application of the Rules of Court

Beltran v. AMA Computer College, G.R. No.

223795, 3 April 2019

Daikoku Electronics v. Raza, G.R. No. 181688,

5 June 2009

2. Pleading, notices, and appearances

a. Complaint

Samar-Med Distribution v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 162385, 15 July 2013

Our Haus Realty Development

Corporation v. Parian, G.R. No.
204651, 6 August 2014

Dee Jay’s Inn v. Raneses, G.R. No.

191823, 5 October 2016

b. Filing and service of pleadings

Charter Chemical v. Tan, G.R. No.

163891, 21 May 2009

c. Services of notices, resolutions, and

orders

i. How made

ii. When deemed complete

Sy v. Fairland Knitcraft, G.R. No.

182915, 12 December 2011

d. Appearances and authority to bind

i. Who may appear

ii. How made

Gudez v. NLRC, G.R. No. 83023,

23 March 1990

9
 iii. Authority to bind

3. Venue

a. Transfers of venue, how and when

allowed

b. Objections to venue

c. Overseas Filipino Workers

Philtranco Service Enterprises v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 124100, 1 April 1998

4. Consolidation of cases

a. Grounds for consolidation

b. Remedy from denial of motion for

consolidation

5. Issuance and service of summons

a. Contents of summons

b. How summons is effected

c. Validity of summons

Pabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 120457, 24

September 1998

Masagana Concrete Products v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 106916, 3 September 1999

Landbank v. Heirs of Alsua, G.R. No.

167361, 2 April 2007

Oyster Plaza Hotel v. Melivo, G.R. No.

217455, 5 October 2016

6. Prohibited pleadings and motions

a. What are prohibited

b. Effects of filing a prohibited pleading or

motion

7. Motion to dismiss

a. When to file

b. Grounds for motion to dismiss

c. Effect of failure to file

8. Mandatory conciliation and mediation

conference

a. Purpose

10
 b. Who is authorized to conduct

c. Requirements for a valid compromise

i. Effects of a valid compromise

ii. Effect of non-compliance

d. Postponement

e. Effects of non-appearance

i. Complainant

ii. Respondent

9. Amendment of Complaint/Petition

10. Submission of Position Papers and Reply

a. Effect of failure to file

b. Contents of position paper and reply

Magnolia Corporation v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 116813, 24 November 1995

11. Hearing or Clarificatory Conference

12. Death of parties

Fontana Development Corporation v.

Vukasinovic, G.R. No. 222424, 21 September
2016

13. Revival and re-opening or re-filing of

dismissed case and lifting of waiver.

11
MODULE 3: NLRC, OTHER QUASI-JUDICIAL
BODIES, and PRESCRIPTION

1. Powers of the Commission (Art. 225)

Robosa v. NLRC, G.R. No. 176085, 8 February

2012

2. Exclusive original jurisdiction

a. Petition for injunction in ordinary labor

disputes [Art. 225 (e)]

Philippine Airlines v. NLRC, G.R. No.

120567, 20 March 1998

Frondozo v. Manila Electric Company, G.R.

No. 178379, 22 August 2017

i. Requisites for the issuance of an

injunction

Bisig Manggagawa Sa Concrete

Aggregates v. NLRC, G.R. No.
105090, 16 September 1993
Syllabus
ii. Requisites for temporary Recitation
restraining order Textbooks 31 Aug. to
12 Sept. Case Study
b. Petition for injunction in strikes or Supreme 2020
lockouts Court Discussion
Decisions
c. Certified cases (Rule VIII, NLRC Rules
of Procedure)

d. Petition for Extraordinary Remedies

(Rule XII, NLRC Rules of Procedure)

i. Nature of the remedy

ii. Grounds

iii. When and where filed

iv. Requisites of the petition

v. Answer and opposition

vi. Effect of filing

vii. Application for and issuance of

TRO and Writ of Preliminary
Injunction

a. Effectivity of TRO and Writ

of Preliminary Injunction

b. Effect of injunction

12
3. Exclusive appellate jurisdiction

a. Appeal in contempt cases before the

Labor Arbiter

b. Appeal of small money claims resolved

by the DOLE Regional Director or
hearing officer

c. Appeal in cases decided by the Labor

Arbiter

4. Grounds for appeal

5. Requisites for perfecting an appeal

a. Filed within the reglementary period

Calipay v. NLRC, G.R. No. 166411, 3

August 2010

Building Care Corporation v.

Macaraeg, G.R. No. 198357, 10
December 2012

b. Verified by the appellant

himself/herself in accordance with
Section 4, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court

Innodata Knowledge Services v. Inting,

G.R. No. 211892, 6 December 2017

c. A memorandum of appeal stating the

grounds of the appeal, arguments, relief
sought, and date of receipt of the
appealed decision, award or order.

d. Proof of payment of appeal fee and legal

research fee

Luna v. NLRC, G.R. No. 116404, 20

March 1997

e. Posting of an appeal bond

Toyota Alabang v. Games, G.R. No.

206612, 17 August 2015

GBMLT Manpower v. Malinao, G.R.

No. 189262, 6 July 2015

Orozco v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

155207, 29 April 2005

Lepanto Consolidated Mining v. Icao,

G.R. No. 196047, 15 January 2014

13
 Forever Security v. Flores, G.R. No.
147961, 7 September 2007

UERM-Memorial Medical Center v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 110419, 3 March 1997

Manila Mining Co. v. Amor, G.R. No.

182800, 20 April 2015

Banahaw Broadcasting v. Pacana, G.R.

No. 171673, 30 May 2011

McBurnie v. Ganzon, G.R. No. 178034,

17 October 2013

Sara Lee Philippines v. Macatlang, G.R.

No. 180147, 14 January 2015

AFP General Insurance Corporation v.

Molina, G.R. No. 151133, 30 June 2008

f. Proof of service upon the other parties

Sunrise Manning Agency v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 146703, 18 November 2004

EDI Staffbuilders International v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 145587, 26 October
2007

Fernandez v. Botica Claudio, G.R. No.

205870, 13 August 2014

6. Execution Proceedings

a. Final and executory nature of NLRC

judgment

Molina v. Pacific Plans, G.R. No.

165476, 10 March 2006

De Ocampo v. RPN-9, G.R. No.

192947, 9 December 2015

b. Reinstatement pending appeal in

decisions rendered by the Labor Arbiter

Pioneer Texturizing Corp v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 118651, 16 October 1997

Triad Security & Allied Services v.

Ortega, G.R. No. 160871, 6 February
2006

Roquero v. Philippine Airlines, G.R. No.

152329, 22 April 2003

14
 Garcia v. Philippine Airlines, G.R. No.
164856, 20 January 2009

Pfizer v. Velasco, G.R. No. 177467, 9

March 2011

Wenphil Corporation v. Abing, G.R.

No. 207983, 7 April 2014

College of the Immaculate Conception v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 167563, 22 March
2010

Islriz Trading v. Capada, G.R. No.

168501, 31 January 2011

Bergonio v. South East Asian Airlines,

G.R. No. 195227, 21 April 2014

Manila Doctors College v. Olores, G.R.

No. 225044, 3 October 2016

Dup Sound Philippines v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 168317, 21
November 2011

Bañares v. Tabaco Women’s Transport

Service, G.R. No. 197353, 1 April 2013

c. Third party claims in execution

proceeding

Yupangco Cotton Mills v. CA, G.R. No.

126322, 16 January 2002

Ando v. Campo, G.R. No. 184007, 16

February 2011

d. Piercing the veil of corporate fiction

Dutch Movers v. Lequin, G.R. No.

210032, 25 April 2017

Guillermo v. Uson, G.R. No. 198967, 7

March 2016

7. Reliefs against judgments/decisions rendered

by the Commission

a. Petition for Certiorari under Rule 65 to

the Court of Appeals

St. Martin Funeral Homes v. NLRC,

G.R. No. 130866, 16 September 1998

Veloso v. China Airlines, G.R. No.

104302, 14 July 1999

15
 b. Appeal of the CA decision to the
Supreme Court under Rule 45

Hanjin Engineering v. Court of Appeals,

G.R. No. 165910, 10 April 2006

Macasero v. Southern Industrial Gases,

G.R. No. 178524, 30 January 2009

Stanfilco v. Tequillo, G.R. No. 209735,

17 July 2019

8. Compromise Agreements

Magbanua v. Uy, G.R. No. 161003, 6 May

2005

Arellano v. Powertech Corporation, G.R. No.

150861, 22 Januar 2008

Philippine Transmarine Carriers v. Pelagio,

G.R. No. 211302, 12 August 2015

Magsaysay Maritime v. De Jesus, G.R. No.

203943, 30 August 2017

9. Quitclaims

Periquet v. NLRC, G.R. No. 91298, 22 June

1990

Goodrich Manufacturing v. Ativo, G.R. No.

188002, 1 February 2010

Aujero v. Philippine Communications Satellite

Corporation, G.R. No. 193484, 18 January
2012

EDI Staffbuilders v. NLRC, G.R. No. 145587,

26 October 2007

Carolina’s Lace Shoppe v. Maquilan, G.R. No.

219419, 10 April 2019

Other Quasi-Judicial Bodies and Prescription of

Actions

A. DOLE Regional Directors

1. Small money claims without a claim for
reinstatement

Maternity Children’s Hospital v. Secretary

of Labor, G.R. No. 78909, 30 June 1989.

Odin Security v. De La Serna, G.R. No.

87439, 21 February 1990

16
 2. Visitorial and enforcement power (Art.
128 and 289)

SSK Parts Corporation v. Camas, G.R. No.

85934, 30 January 1990.

3. Remedy against decisions rendered by

the Regional Director

B. DOLE Secretary
1. Visitorial and enforcement powers (Art.
128 and 289)

2. Assumption of jurisdiction over strikes

and lockouts (Art. 278 (g)

Telefunken Semiconductors Employees

Union – FFW v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 143013, 18 December 2000

Phimco Industries v. Brillantes, G.R. No.

120751, 17 March 1999. See also: J.
Panganiban’s Separate Opinion.

3. Suspension of the effects of termination

[Art. 292 (b)] DOLE Regional Director

4. Remedy from decisions of the DOLE

Secretary

National Federation of Labor v. Laguesma,

G.R. No. 123426, 10 March 1999

C. Bureau of Labor Relations (Art. 232)

1. Inter-union and intra-union disputes

Pepsi-Cola Sales and Advertising Union v.

Secretary of Labor, G.R. No. 97092, 27 July
1992

Diokno v. Cacdac, G.R. No. 168475, 4 July

2007

Montaño v. Verceles, G.R. No. 168583, 26

July 2010

2. Disputes arising from or affecting labor

management relations except grievances

La Tondeña Workers Union v. Secretary of

Labor, G.R. No. 96821, 9 December 1994

3. Registration of CBA

4. Remedies to decisions rendered by the

BLR

17
 Abbot Laboratories v. Abbot Laboratories
Employees Union, G.R. No. 131374, 26
January 2000

Heritage Hotel Manila v. NUWHRAIN,

G.R. No. 178296, 12 January 2011

Takata Corporation v. Bureau of Labor

Relations, G.R. No. 196276, 4 June 2014

D. National Conciliation and Mediation Board

Tabigue v. International Copra Export
Corporation, G.R. No. 183335, 23 December
2009

1. Preventive Mediation (Rules V and VI,

NCMB Manual of Procedure)

Insular Hotel Employees Union-NFL v.

Waterfront Insular Hotel Davao, G.R. No.
174040, 22 September 2010

E. Voluntary Arbitrator
1. Jurisdiction and Remedies

Santuyo v. Remerco Garments, G.R. No.

174420, 22 March 2010

Teng v. Pahagac, G.R. No. 169704, 17

November 2010

Samahan ng mga Manggagawa sa Hyatt v.

Magsalin, G.R. No. 164939, 6 June 2011

NYK-Fil-Ship Management v. Dabu, G.R.

No. 225142, 13 September 2017

Guagua National Colleges v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 188492, 28 August 2018

Sanyo Philippines Workers Union v.

Canizares, G.R. No. 101619, 8 July 1992

Negros Metal v. Lamayo, G.R. No. 186557,

25 August 2010

Landtex Industries v. Court of Appeals, G.R.

No. 150278, 9 August 2007

Octavio v. PLDT, G.R. No. 175492, 27

February 2013

2. Submission Agreement

Temic Automotive Philippines v. Temic

Automotive Philippines Inc. Employees

18
 Union, G.R. No. 186965, 23 December
2009

F. Prescription of Actions
1. Money claims (Art. 306, Labor Code)

PLDT v. Pingol, G.R. No. 182622, 8

September 2010

Serrano v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

139420, 15 August 2001

Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation

v. Panganiban, G.R. No. 151407, 6
February 2007

Accessories Specialist v. Alabanza, G.R. No.

168985, 23 July 2008

Auto Bus Transport v. Bautista, G.R. No.

156367, 16 May 2005

Montero v. Times Transportation, G.R. No.

190828, 16 March 2015

2. Illegal dismissal (Art. 1146, Civil Code)

Callanta v. Carnation Philippines, G.R. No.

70615, 28 October 1986

3. Offenses under the Labor Code

Arriola v. Pilipino Star Ngayon, G.R. No.

175689, 13 August 2014

Cadalin v. POEA, G.R. No. 104776, 5

December 1994

4. Illegal recruitment (RA 8042, as

amended)

MODULE 4: Right to Self-Organization

A. Legal Basis
Syllabus
1. Sec. 2, Art. II, 1987 Constitution 14 Sept. to Recitation
Textbooks 26 Sept.
2. Sec. 3, Art. XIII, 1987 Constitution 2020 Case Study
3. Sec. 8, Art. III, 1987 Constitution Supreme
Court Discussion
4. Arts. 253-257, Labor Code. Decisions

See also: Department Order No. 43-03 and

Department Order 40-I-15

19
 Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Hanjin
Shipyard v. Bureau of Labor Relations, G.R.
No. 211145, 14 October 2015.

B. Persons who have the right to form, join, or

assist labor organizations

1. Employees of commercial, industrial, and

agricultural enterprises.

2. Employees of GOCC’s without original

charters and formed under the
Corporation Code

3. Employees of religious, charitable,

medical or educational institutions,
whether operating for profit or not

4. Supervisory employees

Paper Industries Corporation v. Laguesma,

G.R. No. 101738, 12 April 2000

Samahang Manggagawa sa Charter Chemical

v. Charter Chemical, G.R. No. 169717, 16
March 2011

5. Alien employees

6. Working children

7. Homeworkers

8. Employees of cooperatives

Cooperative Rural Bank of Davao City v.

Calleja, G.R. No. 77951, 26 September
1988

San Jose Electric Service Cooperative, G.R.

No. 77231, 31 May 1989

9. Employees of legitimate contractors

C. Persons who cannot join, form or assist labor

organizations

1. Managerial employees

United Pepsi-Cola Supervisory Union v.

Laguesma, G.R. No. 122226, 25 March 1998

2. Confidential employees

Metrolab Industries v. Confesor, G.R. No.

108855, 28 February 1996

20
 San Miguel Corporation Supervisors and
Exempt Union v. Laguesma, G.R. No.
110399, 15 August 1997

San Miguel Foods v. San Miguel Corporation

Supervisors and Exempt Union, G.R. No.
146206, 1 August 2011

Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union

v. Standard Chartered Bank. G.R. No.
161933, 22 April 2008

D. Effect of Commingling of Membership (Art.

256)

Republic v. Kawashima Textile, G.R. No.

160352, 23 July 2008

Holy Child Catholic School v. Sto. Tomas,

G.R. No. 179146, 23 July 2013

E. Rights and Conditions of Membership

1. Union members [Art. 250, 292(c)]

Victoriano v. Elizalde Roper Workers’ Union,

L-25246, 12 September 1974

Bank of the Philippine Islamds v. BPI

Employees Union, G.R No. 164301, 10
August 2010

Slord Development v. Noya, G.R. No.

232687, 4 February 2019

2. Legitimate labor organization [Art. 251-

252, 292(a)]

a. Check-off, assessment, and agency

fees [Art. 259(e)]

Del Pilar Academy v. Del Pilar

Academy Union, G.R. No. 170112, 30
April 2008

Palacol v. Ferrer-Calleja, G.R. No.

85333, 26 February 1990

Gabriel v. Secretary of Labor, G.R. No.

115949, 16 March 2000

Johnson and Johnson Labor Union-

FFW v. Director of Labor Relations,
G.R. No. 76427, 21 February 1989

Peninsula Employees Union v.

Esquivel, G.R. No. 218454, 1
December 2016

21
 b. Affiliation and Disaffiliation

Ergonomic Systems v. Enaje, G.R. No.

195163, 13 December 2017

Philippine Skylanders v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 127374, 31 January 2002

Villar v. Inciong, L-50283, 20 April

1983

Association of Nationalist and Genuine

Labor Organization v. Samahan ng mga
Manggagawang Nagkakaisa sa Manila
Bay, G.R. No. 118562, 5 July 1986

Chrysler Philippines Labor Union v.

Estrella, L-46509, 16 November 1978

Associated Worker’s Union-PTGWO v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 87266, 30 July 1990

c. Substitutionary Doctrine

Benguet Consolidated v. BCI

Employees & Workers Union, L-24711,
30 April 1968

Elisco-Elirol Labor Union v. Noriel, L-

41955, 29 December 1977

MODULE 5: The Bargaining Unit, Sole and

Exclusive Bargaining Agent, and Collective
Bargaining

A. The Collective Bargaining Unit

Toyota Motor Philippines v. Toyota Motor
Syllabus
Philippines Corporation Labor Union, G.R.
Recitation
No. 121084, 19 February 1997
Textbooks 28 Sept. to
Dunlop Slazenger v. Secretary of Labor, G.R. 9 Oct. Case Study
No. 131248, 11 December 1998 Supreme 2020
Court and Discussion
Interntational School Alliance of Educators v. Court of
Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, 1 June 2000 Appeals Quiz
Decisions
B. Determination of Sole and Exclusive
Bargaining Representative (Art. 267-272)

1. Request for Certification

2. Certification election

a. Organized establishment

22
 i. Requisites

b. Unorganized establishment

Progressive Development Corporation-

Pizza Hut v. Laguesma, G.R. No. 115077,
18 April 1997

UST Faculty Union v. Bitonio, G.R. No.

131235, 16 November 1999

National Union of Workers in Hotels

Restaurants and Allied Industries v.
Secretary of Labor, G.R. No. 181531, 31
July 2009

Yokohama Tire v. Yokohama Employees

Union, G.R. No. 159553, 10 December
2007

c. Bar rules

i. Contract bar rule

ii. Statutory bar rule

iii. Certification year bar rule

iv. Negotiations bar rule

v. Bargaining deadlock bar rule

Capitol Medical Center Alliance

of Concerned Employees v.
Laguesma, G.R. No. 118915, 4
February 1997

Kaisahan ng Manggagawang
Pilipino v. Trajano, G.R. No.
75810, 9 September 1991

3. Consent election

4. Run-off election

5. Re-run election

C. Collective Bargaining
1. Duty to bargain collectively (Art. 261-
265)

a.Freedom period

b. Automatic renewal clause

Kiok Loy v. NLRC, L-54334, 22 January

1986

23
 Union of Filipro Employees v. Nestle
Philippines, G.R. No. 158930, 3 March
2008

UST Faculty Union v. University of Sto.

Tomas, G.R. No. 180892, 7 April 2009

General Milling Corporation v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 146728, 11 February
2004

Philippine Airlines v. Philippine Airlines

Employees Association, G.R. No. 142399,
12 March 2008

FVC Labor Union v. SANAMA-FVC-

SIGLO, G.R. No. 176249, 27 November
2009

San Miguel Corporation Employees Union

v. Confesor, G.R. No. 111262, 19
September 1996

Hong Kong Bank Independent Labor

Union v. HSBC, G.R. No. 218390, 28
February 2018

Divine Word University v. Secretary of

Labor, G.R. No. 91915, 11 September
1992

2. Collective Bargaining Agreement

a. Nature of a CBA

Wesleyan University v. Wesleyan

University Faculty and Staff
Association, G.R. No. 181806, 12
March 2014

b. Persons entitled to CBA benefits

c. CBA provisions

i. Grievance machinery and

voluntary arbitration (Art. 273)

ii. “No strike. No lockout.”

Clause

Master Iron Labor Union v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 92009, 17
February 1993

Panay Electric Company v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 102672, 4
October 1995

24
 iii. Labor management council

d. Duration of the CBA

i. Economic provisions

General Milling Corporation-

Independent Labor Union v.
General Milling Corporation,
G.R. No. 183122, 15 June 2011

ii. Representation

FVC Labor Union v. Sama-

Samang Nagkakaisaing
Manggagawa sa FVC, G.R. No.
176249, 27 November 2009

iii. Retroactivity

Union of Filipro Employees v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 91025, 19
December 1990

Manila Electric Co. v.

Quisumbing, G.R. No. 127598,
22 February 2000 and 1 August
2000 Resolutions.

12 Oct to
MID-TERM EXAMINATIONS 17 Oct.
2020

MODULE 6: ULP and Peaceful Concerted

Activities

A. Unfair Labor Practice [Arts. 258-260, 274,

278(c)]

1. Nature, Aspect, and Elements of ULP’s Syllabus

Recitation
T&H Shopfitters Corporation v. T&H Textbooks 19 Oct. 19
Shopfitters Union, G.R. No. 191714, 26 to Oct. 24 Case Study
February 2014 Supreme 2020
Court Discussion
2. ULP by the employer
Decisions
Insular Life Assurance Employees
Association v. Insular Life, L-25291, 30
January 1971

Ren Transport v. NLRC, G.R. No. 188020,

27 June 2016

25
 Arellano University Employees and Workers
Union v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139940,
19 September 2006

Digital Telecommunications Philippines v.

Digitel Employees Union, G.R. No. 184903,
10 October 2012

BPI Employees Union – Davao v. Bank of the

Philippine Islands, G.R. No. 174912, 24 July
2013

Rivera v. Espiritu, G.R. No. 135547, 23

January 2002

Great Pacific Life Employees Union v. Great

Pacific Life Assurance Corporation, G.R. No.
126717, 11 February 1999

A.C. Ransom Labor Union v. NLRC, L-

69494, 29 May 1987

Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union

v. Confesor, G.R. No. 196276, 16 June 2004

Employees Union of Bayer v. Bayer, G.R. No.

162943, 6 December 2010

3. ULP by Labor Organizations

a. Restraint and coercion in the exercise

of right to self-organize

b. Discrimination

c. Violation of duty to bargain

collectively

d. Featherbedding

e. Demand for payment of stand-by

services

f. Demand for or acceptance of

negotiation fees or attorney’s fees

g. Gross violations of the CBA

4. Criminal and civil liability for ULP

B. Peaceful Concerted Activities

1. Strikes (See: NCMB Primer on Strikes)

a. Nature of a Strike

NUWHRAIN Dusit Hotel v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 163942, 11
November 2008

26
 Interphil Laboratories Employees Union
v. Interphil, G.R. No. 142824, 19
December 2001

Ramirez v. Polyson, G.R. No. 207898, 19

October 2016

Naranjo v. Biomedica Healthcare, G.R.

No. 193789, 19 September 2012

b. Requisites for a valid strike

Lapanday Workers Union v. NLRC, G.R.

No. 95494, 7 September 1995

c. Illegal strikes

Toyota Motor Phils. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

158786, 19 October 2007

Samahang Manggagawa sa Sulpicio

Lines v. Sulpicio Lines, G.R. No. 140992,
25 March 2004

Biflex v. Filflex, G.R. No. 155679, 19

December 2006

Air Line Pilots Association v. CIR, L-

33705, 15 April 1977

Abaria v. NLRC, G.R. No. 154113, 7

December 2011

Bigg’s v. Boncacas, G.R. No. 200487, 6

March 2019

Grand Boulevard Hotel v. Genuine Labor

Organization, G.R. No. 153664, 18 July
2003

d. Liability of officers and ordinary

union members

Philippine Diamond Hotel v. Manila

Diamond Hotel Employees Union, G.R.
No. 158075, 30 June 2006

Solidbank v. Gamier, G.R. No. 159460,

15 November 2010

C Alcantara & Sons v. Court of Appeals,

G.R. No. 155109, 29 September 2010
and 14 March 2012

2. Picketing

MSF Tire and Rubber v. Court of Appeals,

G.R. No. 128632, 5 August 1999

27
 Phimco Industries v. Phimco Industries
Labor Association, G.R. No. 170830, 11
August 2010

3. Lockout

a. Requisites for a valid lockout

4. Assumption of jurisdiction

International Pharmaceuticals v. Secretary

of Labor, G.R. No. 92981, 9 January 1992

Telefunken Semiconductors Employees

Union – FFW v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
143013, 18 December 2000, supra

Phimco Industries v. Brillantes, G.R. No.

120751, 17 March 1999, supra

MODULE 7: Kinds of Employment

A. Regular

1. Definition of regular employment

2. Test in determining regular employment

De Leon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 70705, 21

August 1989.

Magsalin v. National Organization of

Working Men, G.R. No. 148492, 9 May
2003.
Syllabus
B. Probationary (Art. 295, and Omnibus Rules Recitation
Implementing the Labor Code, Book 6, Rule 1, Textbooks 26 Oct. to
Section 6.) Oct. 30 Case study
Supreme 2020
Canadian Opportunities Unlimited v. Dalangin,
Court Discussion
G.R. No. 172223, 6 February 2012.
Decisions
1. Definition of probationary employment

2. Right to be informed of standards for

regularization.

Aliling v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 185829, 25

April 2012.

Philippine Daily Inquirer v. Magtibay,

G.R. No. 164532, 27 July 2007.

Abbot Laboratories v. Alcaraz, G.R. No.

192571, 23 July 2013 and 22 April 2014.

28
 Enchanted Kingdom v. Verzo, G.R. No.
209559, 9 December 2015.

3. Period of probation

a. General Rule

International Catholic Migration

Commission v. NLRC, G.R. No.
72222, 30 January 1989, 169 SCRA
606.

b. Teachers

Magis Young Achievers’ Learning

Center v. Manalo, G.R. No. 178835,
13 February 2009.

Mercado v. AMA Computer College,

G.R. No. 183572, 13 April 2010.

Colegio del Santisimo Rosario v. Rojo,

G.R. No. 170388, 4 September 2013.

c. By agreement, nature of the work,

required or established by
company policy

Buiser v. Hon. Leogardo, L-63316, 31

July 1984.

Mariwasa Manufacturing v. Leogardo,

G.R. No. 74246, 26 January 1989.

C. Project (See also: Department Order No. 19,

Series of 1993)

ALU-TUCP v. NLRC, G.R. No. 109902, 2

August 1994.

Leyte Geothermal Power Progressive Employees

Union – ALU – TUCP v. PNOC-EDC, G.R.
No. 170351, 30 March 2011.

Malicdem v. Marulas Industrial Corporation,

G.R. No. 204406, 26 February 2014

Maraguinot v. NLRC, 348 Phil. 580 (1998)

Liganza v. RBL Shipyard Corporation, G.R. No.

159862, 17 October 2006.

Hanjin Heavy Industries v. Ibanez, G.R. No.

170181, 26 June 2008.

PNOC-Energy Development Corporarion v.

NLRC, G.R. No. 169353, 13 April 2007.

29
 Filsystems v. Cruz, G.R. No. 153832, 18
March 2005.

E. Ganzon, Inc. v. Ando, G.R. No. 214183, 20

February 2017.

Mercado v. NLRC, G.R. No. 79869, 5

September 1991, 201 SCRA 332.

Cocomangas Hotel Beach Resort v. Visca, G.R.

No. 167045, 29 August 2008.

Gadia v. Sykes Asia, G.R. No. 209499. 28

January 2015.

D. Seasonal

Hacienda Fatima v. National Federation of

Sugarcane Workers, G.R. No. 149440, 28
January 2003

Gapayao v. Fulo, G.R. No. 193493, 13 June

2013.

Universal Robina Sugar Milling Corporation v.

Acibo, G.R. No. 186439, 15 January 2014.

Paz v. Northern Tobacco Redrying Co., G.R.

No. 199554, 18 February 2015.

E. Casual

Kimberly Independent Labor Union v. Drilon,

G.R. No. 77629, 9 May 1990, 185 SCRA 190.

Philippine Geothermal Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

82643-67, 30 August 1990, 189 SCRA 211.

F. Fixed term

Brent School v. Zamora, 181 SCRA 702, (1990).

Fuji Network Television v. Espiritu, G.R. Nos.

204944-45, 3 December 2014.

Samonte v. La Salle Greenhills, G.R. No.

199683, 10 February 2016.

Poseidon Fishing v. NLRC, G.R. No. 168052,

20 February 2006.

Fabella v. San Miguel Corporation, G.R. No.

150658, 9 February 2007.

30
 MODULE 8: Management Prerogative,
Resignation, and Procedural Due Process

I. Management Prerogative
A. Right to discipline
St. Luke’s Medical Center v. Sanchez, G.R. No.
212054, 11 March 2015

Philippine Span Asia Carriers v. Pelayo, G.R.

No. 212003, 28 February 2018

B. Right to transfer
Peckson v. Robinsons Supermarket, G.R. No.
198534, 3 July 2013

C. Right to impose productivity standard

Puncia v. Toyota Shaw, G.R. No. 214399, 28
June 2016

D. Change of work hours

Syllabus
E. Bonuses Recitation
Textbooks 3 Nov. to
Metro Transit Organization v. NLRC, G.R. No. 20 Nov. Case Study
116008, 11 July 1995 Supreme 2020
Court Discussion
F. Prescription of rules on marriage Decisions
Duncan Assoocation of Detailman-PTGWO v.
Glaxo Wellcome, G.R. No. 162994, 17
September 2004

Star Paper v. Simbol, G.R. No. 164774, 12

April 2006.

G. Post-employment ban
Tiu v. Platinum Plans, G.R. No. 163512, 28
February 2007

II. Post-Employment
A. Voluntary resignation by the employee
(Art. 300)

Doble v. ABB, G.R. No. 215627, 5 June 2017

Mora v. Avesco Marketing, G.R. No. 177414,

14 November 2008

Intertrod Maritime v. NLRC, G.R. No. 81087,

19 June 1991

31
 Hechanova Bugay Vilchez Lawyers v. Matorre,
G.R. No. 198261, 16 October 2013

B. Involuntary resignation/Constructive
dismissal

Torreda v. Investment and Capital Corporation,

G.R. No. 229881, 5 September 2018

Ico v. Systems Technology Institute, G.R. No.

185100, 9 July 2014

Philippine Span Asia v. Pelayo, G.R. No.

212003, 28 February 2018

Agcolicol v. Casiño, G.R. No. 217732, 15 June

2016

C. Procedural Due Process (DOLE Dept. Order

147-15)

1. Required Due Process in Termination

for Just Causes

Agabon v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158693, 17

November 2004

King of Kings Transport v. Mamac, G.R.

No. 166208, 29 June 2007

Perez v. Philippine Telegraph and Telephone

Co., G.R. No. 152048, 7 April 2009

Puncia v. Toyota Shaw, G.R. No. 214399,

28 June 2016

Sta. Isabel v. Perla Compañia de Seguros,

G.R. No. 219430, 7 November 2016

2. Required Due Process for Authorized

Causes

Jaka Food Processing v. Pacot, G.R. No.

151378, 28 March 2005

3. Contractual Due Process

Abbot Laboratories v. Alcaraz, G.R. No.

192571, 23 July 2013

32
 MODULE 9: Just Causes for Termination of
Employment

1. Serious Misconduct

Imasen Philippine Corporation v. Alcon, G.R. No.

194884, 22 October 2014 (elements of

Northwest Airlines v. Del Rosario, G.R. No.

157633, 10 September 2014 (Definition of fight;
fighting as serious misconduct)

Citibank v. NLRC, G.R. No. 159302, 6 February

2008 (Attitude problem as serious misconduct)

Mirant Philippines v. Caro, G.R. No. 181490, 23

April 2014 (refusal to undergo drug test not
necessarily serious misconduct)

Nacague v. Sulpicio Lines, G.R. No. 172589, 9

August 2010 (required proof for dismissal for
use of drugs, drug use as serious misconduct)

Leus v. St. Scholastica’s College, G.R. No. 187226,

28 January 2015 (secular morality as basis for Syllabus
determining whether there is serious Recitation
misconduct) Textbooks 23 Nov. to
28 Nov. Case Study
2. Gross insubordination/Willful disobedience Supreme 2020
Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf v. Arenas, G.R. No. Court Discussion
208908, 11 March 2015 Decisions

Lores Realty Enterprises v. Pacia, G.R. No. 171189,

9 March 2011 (good faith refusal to obey a
lawful order)

ePacific Global Contact Center v. Cabansay, G.R.

No. 167345, 23 November 2007 (refusal to
comply with lawful order)

3. Gross and habitual neglect

St. Luke’s Medical Center v. Notario, G.R. No.

152166, 20 October 2010 (negligence must not
only be gross but habitual, single act does not
suffice)

LBC Express v. Mateo, G.R. No. 168215, 9 June

2009 (single act of negligence leading to loss of
substantial amount justified dismissal)

Mansion Printing Center v. Bitara, G.R. No.

168120, 15 January 2012 (habitual tardiness and
absenteeism as grounds for dismissal, totality
of infractions)

33
 Cavite Apparel v. Marquez, G.R. No. 172044, 6
Februar 2013 (Four absences over six month
period, not gross and habitual neglect,
dismissal not commensurate to the infraction)

Manarpiis v. Texan Philippines, G.R. No. 197011,

28 January 2015 (Requisites for abandonment)

4. Fraud

Philippine Airlines v. NLRC, G.R. No. 126805, 16

March 2000 (Fraud need not lead to actual loss
to justify dismissal)

5. Loss of confidence/Breach of trust

Sta. Ana v. Manila Jockey Club, G.R. No. 208459,

15 February 2017 (requisites for breach of trust)

Hormillosa v. Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, G.R.

No. 198699, 9 October 2013 (Non-managerial
employees)

Manese v. Jollibee Foods Corporation, G.R. No.

170454, 11 October 2012 (Managerial employee)

6. Commission of a crime

Reno Foods v. Nagkakaisang Lakas ng

Manggagawa, G.R. No. 164016, 15 March 2010
(acquittal does not invalidate dismissal for
commission of a crime)

Lynvil Fishing Enterprises v. Ariola, G.R. No.

181974, 1 February 2012 (findings in
preliminary investigation not binding upon
labor tribunals)

7. Other analogous causes

John Hancock Life Insurance v. Davis, G.R. No.

169549, 3 September 2008 (Theft of co-worker’s
property is analogous to serious misconduct)

MODULE 10: Authorized Causes, Reliefs in

Illegal Dismissal, and Retirement Syllabus Recitation

A. Authorized Causes for Termination of 1 Dec. to

Textbooks Case Study
Employment 11 Dec.
2020
Supreme Discussion
1. Redundancy
Court
Arabit v. Jardine Pacific, G.R. No. 181719, 21 Decisions Quiz
April 2014 (Distinction between

34
 redundancy and retrenchment; Guidelines
for valid redundancy)

Shimizu Philippines v. Callanta, G.R. No.

165923, 29 September 2010 (Guidelines for
valid redundancy; purpose of notice to
DOLE; nominal damages for non-
compliance)

2. Retrenchment

Asian Alcohol Corporation v. NLRC, G.R. No.

131108, 25 March 1999 (Requirements for
valid retrenchment, Proof required,
includes prevention of losses)

FASAP v. Philippine Airlines, G.R. No.

178083, 13 March 2018 (AFS not absolute
requirement for valid retrenchment;
judicial notice of company undergoing
corporate rehabilitation)

Sebuguero v. NLRC, G.R. No. 115394, 27

September 1995 (Temporary Lay-off and
Art. 301 by analogous application)

3. Closure of Business

Sangwoo Philippines v. Sangwoo Philippines

Employees Union, G.R. No. 173154, 9
December 2013 (Closure due to serious
business losses no separation pay, posting
of notices not compliant with procedural
due process, reduced nominal damages)

Navotas Shipyard v. Montallana, G.R. No.

190053, 24 March 2014 (Temporary closure
ripening to closure due to serious business
losses, nominal damages)

4. Disease

Deoferio v. Intel Technology Philippines, G.R.

No. 202996, 18 June 2014 (Disease need not
be contagious; Any disease including
mental illness; procedural due process is
required)

B. Reliefs for illegal dismissal

1. Backwages

United Coconut Chemicals v. Almores, G.R.

No. 201018, 12 July 2017 (inclusions in
backwages, employer liability in illegal

35
 dismissal done in relation to a union
security clause)

Session Delights v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

172149, 8 February 2010 (Backwages in
relation to immutability of judgment)

Bani Rural Bank v. De Guzman, G.R. No.

170904, 13 November 2013

Nacar v. Gallery Frames, G.R. No. 189871, 13

August 2013 (Rules on interest)

Lara’s Gift & Decors v. Midtown Industrial

Sales, G.R. No. 225433, 28 August 2019
(Revised rules on interest)

2. Reinstatement

Olympia Housing v. Pastora, G.R. No.

187691, 13 January 2016 (Reinstatement no
longer possible due to closure; grant of
backwages and separation pay to run up to
date of closure)

3. Separation pay in lieu of reinstatement

Claudia’s Kitchen v. Tanguin, G.R. No.

221096, 28 June 2017 (Separation pay in lieu
of reinstatement, when proper)

4. Attorney’s Fees

PCL Shipping v. NLRC, G.R. No. 153031, 14

December 2006 (Attorney’s Fees in labor
cases as extraordinary concept)

C. Retirement

Padillo v. Rural Bank of Nabunturan, G.R. No.

199338, 21 January 2013 (Disqualified from
retirement benefits due to failure to reach
optional retirement age; grant of financial
assistance)

De La Salle Araneta University v. Bernardo,

G.R. No. 190809, 13 February 2017
(Entitlement to retirement pay)

Dec. 12-
FINAL EXAMINATIONS 17, 2020

36
TEXTBOOKS:

(Insert Prescribed Textbook/s here)

POLICIES:

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students who are called to recite but are absent/disconnected shall get a grade of 65.
3. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
4. Students are prohibited from recording the online class as this is a violation of the
intellectual property rights of the Professor.

Prepared by:

Signature
[Insert Name of Professor]
Faculty, College of Law

Approved by:

Signature
Atty. Marciano G. Delson
Dean, College of Law

Date Prepared by the Faculty: [Date]

37