DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2003

BUDGET ESTIMATES

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES
FEBRUARY 2002

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &

EVALUATION, NAVY
BUDGET ACTIVITY 7
 UNCLASSIFIED

Department of the Navy

FY 2000 RDT&E Program Exhibit R-1

APPROPRIATION: 1319n Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy DATE: February 2002

Thousands of Dollars
Program
R-1 Element Budget Security
Line Number Number Item Nomenclature Activity FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Classification

171 7
172 7
173 0604805N Commercial Operating & Support Savings 7 8.025 0.000 0.000 U
174 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 7 50.146 45.417 40.278 U
175 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 7 29.811 33.790 34.567 U
176 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 7 0.846 0.987 1.091 U
177 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 7 0.000 4.168 21.452 U
178 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS 7 221.267 251.772 204.466 U
179 0204152N E-2 Squadrons 7 55.694 37.401 19.011 U
180 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) 7 14.012 23.816 12.576 U
181 0204229N Tomahawk & TMPC 7 92.456 75.347 94.265 U
182 0204311N Integrated Surveillance System 7 35.838 38.299 20.405 U
183 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS 7 11.604 22.316 6.352 U
184 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7 25.206 25.233 31.421 U
185 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 7 9.693 10.069 6.731 U
186 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT 7 38.544 28.080 60.758 U
187 0205604N Tactical Data Links 7 25.732 39.013 42.667 U
188 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 7 30.008 27.869 24.424 U
189 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP 7 15.156 16.979 22.052 U
190 0205633N Aviation Improvements 7 48.339 44.929 40.915 U
191 0205658N Navy Science Assistance Program 7 0.000 18.480 4.801 U
192 0205667N F-14 Upgrade 7 10.974 1.487 0.000 U
193 0205675N Operational Nuclear Power Systems 7 52.945 54.714 56.804 U
194 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 7 96.438 119.716 174.664 U
195 0206623M MC Ground Combat/Spt Arms Sys 7 38.581 38.547 36.004 U
196 0206624M MC Combat Services Support 7 5.670 8.408 21.041 U
197 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 7 23.801 16.257 1.957 U
198 0207163N AMRAAM 7 11.290 10.700 8.124 U
199 7
202 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 7 39.265 53.698 115.903 U
203 0303140N Information Systems Security Plan 7 30.277 26.668 18.436 U
204 7
205 0305160N Def Meteorological Satellite Prog (Space) 7 22.079 22.294 19.801 U
206 0305188N JOINT C4ISR BATTLE CENTER (JBC) 7 9.458 13.493 21.970 U
211 0305208N Distributed Common Ground Systems 7 4.419 7.127 4.482 U
212 0305927N NAVAL SPACE SURVEILLANCE 7 1.411 4.893 9.548 U
213 0308601N MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT 7 13.377 12.566 7.783 U
214 0702207N DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) 7 37.337 13.448 7.119 U
215 0708011N Industrial Preparedness 7 67.305 72.459 70.631 U
216 0708730N MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) 7 9.013 33.269 9.943 U

Total Operational Systems Development 1,384.854 1,389.030 1,502.145

Page 1
 UNCLASSIFIED

Department of the Navy

FY 2000 RDT&E Program Exhibit R-1
Alphabetic Listing

APPROPRIATION: 1319n Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy DATE: February 2002

Thousands of Dollars
Program
R-1 Element Budget Security
Line Number Number Item Nomenclature Activity FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 Classification

209 0305206N AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS 7 25.964 17.381 5.469 U

183 0204413N AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS 7 11.604 22.316 6.352 U
198 0207163N AMRAAM 7 11.290 10.700 8.124 U
190 0205633N Aviation Improvements 7 48.339 44.929 40.915 U
173 0604805N Commercial Operating & Support Savings 7 8.025 0.000 0.000 U
184 0204571N CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 7 25.206 25.233 31.421 U
210 0305207N DARP, Special Project Aircraft 7 44.520 38.132 11.166 U
205 0305160N Def Meteorological Satellite Prog (Space) 7 22.079 22.294 19.801 U
211 0305208N Distributed Common Ground Systems 7 4.419 7.127 4.482 U
179 0204152N E-2 Squadrons 7 55.694 37.401 19.011 U
185 0204575N ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT 7 9.693 10.069 6.731 U
178 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS 7 221.267 251.772 204.466 U
192 0205667N F-14 Upgrade 7 10.974 1.487 0.000 U
180 0204163N FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) 7 14.012 23.816 12.576 U
186 0205601N HARM IMPROVEMENT 7 38.544 28.080 60.758 U
203 0303140N Information Systems Security Plan 7 30.277 26.668 18.436 U
182 0204311N Integrated Surveillance System 7 35.838 38.299 20.405 U
194 0206313M MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 7 96.438 119.716 174.664 U
196 0206624M MC Combat Services Support 7 5.670 8.408 21.041 U
195 0206623M MC Ground Combat/Spt Arms Sys 7 38.581 38.547 36.004 U
189 0205632N MK-48 ADCAP 7 15.156 16.979 22.052 U
212 0305927N NAVAL SPACE SURVEILLANCE 7 1.411 4.893 9.548 U
191 0205658N Navy Science Assistance Program 7 0.000 18.480 4.801 U
177 0101402N NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS 7 0.000 4.168 21.452 U
193 0205675N Operational Nuclear Power Systems 7 52.945 54.714 56.804 U
202 0303109N SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) 7 39.265 53.698 115.903 U
175 0101224N SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM 7 29.811 33.790 34.567 U
174 0101221N STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT 7 50.146 45.417 40.278 U
176 0101226N SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT 7 0.846 0.987 1.091 U
188 0205620N SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION 7 30.008 27.869 24.424 U
197 0207161N TACTICAL AIM MISSILES 7 23.801 16.257 1.957 U
187 0205604N Tactical Data Links 7 25.732 39.013 42.667 U
208 0305204N TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES 7 121.486 72.692 206.359 U
181 0204229N Tomahawk & TMPC 7 92.456 75.347 94.265 U
171 7
172 7
199 7
200 7
201 7
204 7

Total Operational Systems Development 1,257.822 1,257.288 1,406.669

Page 2
 Fiscal Year 2003 Budget Estimates
Budget Appendix Extract Language

RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY

(RDTEN)
For expenses necessary for basic and applied scientific research, development, test
and evaluation, including maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities
and equipment, [$11,498,506,000] $12,501,630,000, to remain available for obligation
until September 30, [2003] 2004: Provided, That funds appropriated in this paragraph
which are available for the V–22 may be used to meet unique operational requirements of
the Special Operations Forces. (10 U.S.C. 174, 2352–54, 7522; Department of Defense
Appropriations Act, 2002; additional authorizing legislation required.)
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

Cost ($ in FY FY FY FY2004 FY FY FY Cost to Total

Millions) 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 Complete Cost
Total PE Cost 50.1 45.5 40.3 41.4 41.8 43.1 43.0 CONT. CONT.
J0951 TRIDENT II 9.2 8.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9594.5

S0004 TRIDENT 0.6 0.6 5.4 4.4 4.3 5.4 4.7 CONT CONT
Submarine System
Improvement

J2228 Technology 40.3 36.2 34.9 37.0 37.5 37.7 38.3 CONT CONT
Applications
Program

RDT&E Articles
Qty
Defense 0 30.0 30.0 30.0 0 0 0 90.0
Emergency
Response Fund
(DERF)/Cost of
War (COW): J0951

Defense 0 39.9 54.7 71.5 72.5 71.5 CONT. CONT.

Emergency
Response Fund
(DERF)/Cost of
War (COW): J2228

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 1 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

A. U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:

The TRIDENT II (D5) Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) provides the U.S. a
weapon system with greater accuracy and payload capability as compared to the TRIDENT
I (C4) system. TRIDENT II enhances U.S. strategic deterrence providing a survivable
sea-based system capable of engaging the full spectrum of potential targets with fewer
submarines. This PE supports investigations into new technologies which would help
mitigate the program impact due to component obsolescence and a rapidly decreasing
manufacturing support base. Efforts also include Reentry System and Guidance System
Applications efforts. The TRIDENT Submarine System Improvement Program develops and
integrates command and control Improvements needed to maintain TRIDENT Submarine
operational capability through the life cycle of this vital strategic asset. The
program conducts efforts needed to maintain strategic connectivity, ensure platform
invulnerability, and reduce lifecycle costs through Obsolete Equipment Replacement
(OER) and commonality.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY:

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses
engineering and manufacturing development for operational systems.

B. (U) Program Change Summary:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
FY 2002 President’s Budget: 53.2 43.4 71.8
Adjustments to: -3.1 +2.1 -31.5
FY 2003 President’s Budget Submit: 50.1 45.5 40.3

Explanation: Changes from FY 2002 President’s Budget to FY 2003 President’s Budget

submission: The decrease in FY 2001 represents a transfer out for closed account
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 2 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

billings (-$1.5M), FY 2001 Navy reprogramming adjustment (-$1.5M), and a government

wide recission (-$.01M). The increase in FY 2002 is a combination of a Congressional
plus up for RADHARD Electronics in project J2228 (+$2.5M) and a Congressional
adjustment (section 8123: Management Reform) of -$0.4M. The decrease in FY 2003 is a
result of the combination of the transfer out of -$35.0M for D5 Life Extension
(project J2228) to Trident II BA 1 WPN, a +$4.0M plus up ( reprogrammed from NAVSEA
OPN Subhead 81HM) to project S0004 for VLRA batteries, adjustment for carryover at R&D
activities (-$0.3M), and inflation adjustment (-$0.2M).

C. (U) Other Program Funding Summary: See enclosed R-2a for each individual project
data.

D. (U) Acquisition Strategy: See enclosed R-2a for each individual project data.

E. (U) Schedule Profile: Not Applicable.

Cost ($ in FY FY FY FY200 FY FY FY Cost to Total

Millions) 2001 2002 2003 4 2005 2006 2007 Complet Cost
e
Project Cost 9.2 8.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 9595.9
J0951 TRIDENT
II
RDT&E Articles
Qty
Defense 0 30.0 30.0 30.0 0 0 0 90.0
Emergency
Response Fund
(DERF)/Cost of
War (COW)
A

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 3 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

. (U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:

The TRIDENT II (D5) Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) provides the U.S. a
weapon system with greater accuracy and payload capability as compared to the TRIDENT
I (C4) system. TRIDENT II enhances U.S. strategic deterrence by providing a
survivable sea-based system capable of engaging the full spectrum of potential targets
with fewer submarines. This project supports investigations into new technologies
which would help mitigate the program impact due to component obsolescence and a
rapidly decreasing manufacturing support base.

NOTE: (U) Defense Emergency Response Fund (DERF)/Cost of War (COW): FY03funding in the
amount of $30M to begin an Effective Enhancement (E2) Demonstration intended to
demonstrate a near term capability to steer a SLBM warhead to GPS-like accuracy.

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 4 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

(U)PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 PLAN:

• (U) ($9.2) SRS: Effort continued in support of phase three development and
Fleet alterations for the SLBM Retargeting System. Full obligation is
complete.

2. (U) FY 2002 PLAN:

• (U) ($8.7) SRS: Efforts continue to complete phase three development
required for deployment and final implementation of the SLBM Retargeting
System Program in October 2003. Full obligation is projected by 3rd
quarter of the 1st year.

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 5 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

B. (U) Other Program Funding Summary: (Dollars in Thousands)

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Program
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(U) Related RDT&E: N/A

C. (U) Acquisition Strategy:

Contracts will continue to be awarded to those sources who were engaged in the TRIDENT
II (D5) development program and are currently engaged in the production and/or
operational support of the deployed D5/C4 Strategic Weapons Systems on the basis of
Other Than Full and Open Competition pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304 (C)
(1) and (3) implemented by FAR 6.302.-1, 3 4.

D. (U) Schedule Profile: Not Applicable.

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 6 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Program Element Name & No. Project Name and Number.
RDT&E,N – BA7 PE 0101221N, Strategic Sub & TRIDENT II – J0951
Weapons System Support

Cost Categories Contract Performin Tota FY01 FY02 Target

Method g l FY01 Awar FY02 Award Cost Tota Value
Product Development & Type Activity PYs Cost d Cost Date To l of
& Cost Date Comple Cost Contra
Location te ct
Ancillary Hardware SS / GDDS/MA. 31.2 0 N/A 0 N/A Cont Cont TBD
Development CPFF
Ancillary Hardware WR NSWC/VA. 51.4 9.2 10/0 8.7 10/01 Cont Cont TBD
Development 0

Subtotal Product 82.6 9.2 8.7

Development
Remarks:

Total Cost 82.6 9.2 8.7 CONT. CONT CONT.

Remarks:

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 RDT&E Project Justification
(Exhibit R-3, Page 7 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

Cost ($ in FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY200 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 Cost to Total Cost
Millions) 4 Complete
Project Cost J2228 40.3 36.2 34.9 37.0 37.5 37.7 38.3 CONT. CONT.
Technology
Applications
Program
RDT&E Articles
Qty
Defense 0 39.9 54.7 71.5 72.5 71.5 CONT. CONT.
Emergency
Response Fund
(DERF)/Cost of
War (COW)
A. (U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
This supports implementation of a coordinated Air Force/Navy Reentry System Applications Program as well as the implementation of a
Strategic Guidance Applications Program. Reentry Vehicle and Guidance Technology is rapidly eroding beyond the point of being
capable to respond to increasing aging phenomena and future requirements. The Nuclear Posture Review examined the infrastructure
which supports the nuclear force structure. It concluded that special actions were required to correct the rapidly eroding
capability to maintain confidence in the existing weapon systems, and recommended that the reentry vehicle and guidance technology
bases should be preserved. That recommendation resulted in the Presidential Decision Directive-30, which directed that programs be
established for the reentry vehicle and guidance technology application.

• Through sustainment of the reentry vehicle technology base, confidence in the dependability and reliability of strategic
SLBM and ICBM weapon systems will be maintained over the long term when no new systems will be in development. Critical
and unique attributes necessary for the design, development and in-service support of current and modernized SLBM reentry
systems have been defined and will be maintained to insure a functioning readiness application technical capability in
reentry is preserved. Working closely with the Air Force, Navy requirements have been integrated with the Air Force
requirements into a comprehensive program. The Program maintains close coordination with the DOD Science and Technology
(S&T) community through the Reliance process in order to: leverage S&T programs, ensure system driven technology base
requirements are considered in contract awards, eliminate duplication of effort and provide an opportunity to demonstrate
appropriate emerging technologies through a reentry flight test evaluation process.

• This program provides a minimum strategic guidance core technology development capability consistent with the Strategic
Advisory Group (SAG) recommendations to CINCSTRAT. The SAG recommended that SSP establish a program which preserves this
critical design and development core. It is a basic bridge program which develops critical guidance technology applicable
to any of the existing Air Force/Navy strategic missiles. The objective is to transition from current capability to a
long term readiness status required to support deployed systems. Air Force and Navy guidance technology requirements are
integrated and needs prioritized. Efforts are focused on alternatives to currently utilized technologies identified as
system "weak links". Current system accuracy and functionality depends upon key technologies which provide radiation
hardened velocity, attitude and stellar sensing capabilities. As the underlying technologies that currently provide these
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 8 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

capabilities age and are no longer technically supportable, modern alternatives must be made available in order to allow
for orderly replacement. There is no commercial market for these technologies and their viability depends on the
strategic community.

NOTE: (U) Defense Emergency Response Fund (DERF)/Cost of War (COW): FY03funding in the
amount of $39.9M includes additional funding for RSAP/GAP initiative ($14.4M), solid
motor test firing ($7.5M) and RADHARD Application Program ($18.0M)

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 PLAN
• (U) ($18.5) Continued Reentry System Applications Program (RSAP). Full obligation
is complete.
FY 2001 efforts include:
(U) Continued development and ground testing of reentry vehicle candidate
heatshield, nosetip and aft closure materials including those available from
Science & Technology (S&T).
(U) Conducted replacement heatshield flight test demonstration.
(U) Downselected Poly Acrylo Nitrile (PAN) fiber alternate heatshield material
candidate for the FY 2005 flight test demonstration.
(U) Evaluated aged hardware flight data and observed ground test anomalies;
developed risk mitigation concepts for known aging mechanisms.
(U) Identified and evaluated low-cost design approaches and components for arming
and fuzing applications.
(U) Identified and evaluated low-cost inertial sensor technology for reentry body
flight test instrumentation.
(U) Maintained RSAP technical program plan, conduct system assessments and continue
vulnerability & hardening certification process in absence of nuclear under
ground testing (UGT) facilities.

• (U) ($21.8) Continued Strategic Guidance Applications Programs (GAP). Full

obligation is complete.
FY 2001 efforts include:
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 9 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

(U) Continued initial Integrated Engineering Environment (IEE)/Strategic Inertial

Guidance Hardware Technology Synthesizer (SIGHTS) integration to provide a “real
time” hardware-in-the-loop simulation capability for FY 2002. Initiated
development of alternative models for incorporation in IEE.
(U) Completed the prototype accelerometer fabrication and initiate testing.
Continued Interferometic Fiber Optic Gyro (IFOG) fabrication and testing.
Continued the stellar subsystem prototype technology task initiated in FY 2000.
Evaluate alternate steller sensor technology. Evaluated circumvention methodology
using SIGHTS hardware.
(U) Pursued alternate strategies in order to attain strategic performance from the
Hemispherical Resonator Gyro (HRG). Assess producibility for various Alternate
PIGA technologies.
(U) Provided Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) capability to the SPAWAR
micro-electronic fabrication facility. This metal interconnect technology
enhancement allows SPAWAR to manufacture electronic devices using methods
compatible with the latest commercial practices. This equipment is required for
the development and validation of Radiation Hardened Technology Computer Aided
Design (RHTCAD) dose rate response modeling.

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 10 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

2. (U) FY 2002 PLAN

• (U) ($18.9) Continue Reentry System Applications Program. Full obligation is

projected by the 3rd quarter of the first year.
FY 2002 efforts include:
(U) Continue development and ground testing of reentry vehicle candidate
heatshield, nosetip, and aft closure materials including those available from
Science & Technology (S&T).
(U) Evaluate low-cost replacement heatshield flight test demonstration.
(U) Establish flight confidence in PAN fiber alternate heatshield material
candidate for the FY 2005 flight test demonstration.
(U) Develop an updated ground and flight test program to assess performance of
reentry components exposed to operational environments beyond their design life;
develop and test risk mitigation concepts for known aging mechanisms.
(U) Continue evaluation of low-cost design approaches and components for arming and
fuzing applications.
(U) Continue evaluation of low-cost inertial sensor technology for reentry body
flight test instrumentation.
(U) Maintain RSAP technical program plan, conduct system assessments and continue
vulnerability & hardening certification process in absence of nuclear under
ground testing (UGT) facilities.

• (U) ($17.3) Continue Strategic Guidance Applications Programs (GAP). Full

obligation is projected by the 3rd quarter of the 1st year. FY 2002 efforts
include:
(U) Initiate IEE virtual implementation validation. Complete IEE/SIGHTS
integration to evaluate alternate system architectures. Initiate incorporation
of alternate sensor technologies, PIGA and system circumvention methodology into
SIGHTS.
(U) Complete the prototype IFOG fabrication and initiate testing. Initiate
alternate stellar subsystem design based on current sensor technology. Survey
emergent technologies for alternate gyro and PIGA. Perform radiation testing of
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 11 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

current electronics technology.

(U) Continue test of Hemispherical Resinator Gyro (HRG) prototype hardware.

Testing will assess the best approach to attain Strategic performance.
(U) Semiconductor process complexity has been increasing steadily and
doubling in density every eighteen to twenty four months. Radiation
hardened electronics have typically lagged commercial state-of-the art electronics
by two to three generations. Every new generation of electronics has
introduced a unique set of radiation response problems. A
radiation hardened program is required to address these production, qualification
and manufacturing issues. The tasks funded under the GAP program have
established the framework for addressing Rad Hard electronics, but do not include
the detailed tasking required to fully address all the Rad Hard issues. The
Radiation Hardened Application efforts herein will compliment
the Gap electronic part activities by specifically focusing on those tasks required
to ensure producibility of Rad Hard parts.

Funding herein is requested for:

(a) A Productization and

Qualification Program for Digital, Analog and Mixed Signal Radiation Hardened
Electronics which will:
o Evaluate commercial process
improvements/enhancements and access for Rad Hard part products
o Identify and eliminate yield inhibitors and
manufacturing issues
o Modify process and design rule to improve yield

o Optimize models (process, device, library)

o Demonstrate consistent yield

o Establish statistical process control
(b) Radiation Hardened Technology computer aided design
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 12 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

efforts which will:

o Enhance existing commercial Technology Computer
Aided design tools to include radiation and reliability
mechanisms
o Develop physical models for these mechanisms
o Validate simulations against actual devices
produced with a controlled process
o Maintain commercial software licenses

3. (U) FY 2003 PLAN

• (U) ($19.8) Continue Reentry System Applications Program. Full obligation is

projected by the 3rd quarter of the first year.
FY 2003 efforts include:
(U) Continue development and ground testing of reentry vehicle candidate
heatshield, nosetip and aft closure materials including those available
from Science & Technology (S&T).
(U) Identify and evaluate next generation low-cost heatshield material candidates.
(U) Conduct an updated ground and flight test program to assess performance of
reentry components exposed to operational environments beyond their design life;
evaluate risk mitigation concepts for known aging mechanisms.
(U) Downselect low-cost design approach and components for Arming and Fuzing
applications.
(U) Downselect a low-cost inertial sensor technology for Reentry Body (RB) flight
test instrumentation.
(U) Maintain RSAP technical program plan, conduct system assessments and continue
Vulnerability & Hardening certification process in absence of Nuclear Under
Ground Testing (UGT) facilities.

• (U) ($15.1) Continue Strategic Guidance Applications Programs (GAP). Full

obligation is projected by the 3rd quarter of the 1st year. FY 2003 efforts
include:
R-1 Item No 174
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 13 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

(U) Continue to develop alternate models for incorporation in IEE. Incorporate

IFOG, the HRG, and the Alternate PIGA into SIGHTS. Utilize IEE/SIGHTS
capability to perform system architecture/design tradeoffs in support of
technology downselect in FY 2006 for D5 Life Extension.
(U) Continue to evaluate alternate sensor technology, accelerometer, gyro, stellar
and electronics for application in the D5 Life Extension Guidance system and/or
replacement of system weak links. Begin prototype radiation-hard sensor build
and test.

B.(U) Other Program Funding Summary:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To
ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(U) Related RDT&E: N/A

C. (U) Acquisition Strategy:

Contracts will continue to be awarded to those sources who were engaged in the TRIDENT II
(D5) development program and are currently engaged in the production and/or operational
support of the deployed D5/C4 Strategic Weapons Systems on the basis of Other Than Full
and Open Competition pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) (1) and (3)
implemented by FAR 6.302.-1, 3 4.

D (U) Schedule Profile: Not Applicable

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 14 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: Jan 2002

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N – BA7 Strategic Submarine & Weapons System Technology Applications J2228
Support, PE 0101221N

Cost Categories Contract Performing Tota FY01 FY02 FY03 Targe

Method Activity & l FY01 Awar FY02 Awar FY03 Awar Cost Total t
SUPPORT AND MANAGEMENT & Type Location PYs Cost d Cost d Cost d To Cost Value
Cost Date Date Date Comple of
te Contr
ac
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS – LMMS/CAL 34.1 4.9 10/0 6.0 10/0 6.0 10/0 CONT. CONT CONT.
CPFF 0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS WR NSWC/VA 26.1 5.4 10/0 4.8 10/0 5.1 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS MIPR DOE/NM 5.3 4.4 10/0 2.9 10/0 3.1 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS – CSDL/MA 2.6 2.7 10/0 4.2 10/0 3.9 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
CPFF 0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS – KAMAN/CO 2.8 0.7 10/0 0.8 10/0 1.0 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
CPFF 0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS-CPFF ARL/TX 0.2 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS-CPFF SAIC/FLA 0.3 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS-CPFF MARK/CA 0.1 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS – CSDL/MA 73.8 15.5 10/0 17.5 10/0 15.2 10/0 CONT. CONT. CONT.
CPFF 0 1 2
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS SS - CNSW/IN 6.7 11/0
CPFF 0
Subtotal Support 144. 40.3 36.2 34.9
7
Remarks

R-1 Item No 174

Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, Page 15 of 15)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY//BA-7 Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development/0101226N

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Total PE Cost 0.846 0.987 1.091 3.078 8.821 8.988 9.158 CONT. CONT.

Submarine Defensive Warfare/V1265 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Submarine Defensive Warfare/F1265 0.846 0.987 1.091 3.078 8.821 8.988 9.158 CONT. CONT.

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: This project develops a Submarine Defensive Warfare System (SDWS) to improve the effectiveness0.000 and
survivability of all classes of US submarines. Project efforts consist of a new acoustic sensor, the Sparsely Populated Volumetric (SPVA), that will improve the
performance of acoustic intercept systems (AN/WLR-9) and will provide a ranging capability for submarines. Integrate technology insertion of COTS through
Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion (ARCI) and Advanced Process Build (APB) software improvements to the AN/WLR-9 system. Next Generation Countermeasure
(NGCM) including Weapons Analysis Facility (WAF) simulation analysis capability provides the US Navy with testing of hardware and software within detailed
representations of acoustic environments. Provides integration of the Anti-Torpedo Torpedo (ATT) All Up Round (AUR) for Submarine Force use.

1. (U) FY 2001 Plan:

- ($0.846) Performed Acoustic Intercept Sensor Development.

2. (U) FY 2002 Plan:

- ($0.987) Continue Acoustic Intercept Technology Transition and conduct at-sea test. Begin WAF Analysis.

3. (U) FY 2003 Plan:

- ($1.091) Continue WAF Analysis.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 176 - 1 of 176 - 5

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 5)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY//BA-7 Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development/0101226N

B. Program Change Summary:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
(U) FY 2002 President’s Budget: 0.879 0.996
(U) Appropriated Value 0.846 0.987
(U) Adjustments to: FY 2001/2002 Appropriated Value/ FY 2002 -0.033 -0.009 1.091
President's Budget:
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 0.846 0.987 1.091

Funding: FY 2001: Reduction of -0.033 due to 0.7% Pro-Rata Reduction ((-0.006), Government-Wide Recission (-0.002), FY01 SBIR (-0.006), June
2001 BTR (-0.017) , and 2001 Actuals (-0.002)).
FY 2002: Reduction of -0.009 due to Management Reform Initiatives (-0.009).
FY 2003: Reduction of -0.011 due to Miscellaneous Reductions.

Schedule: Not Applicable

Technical: Not Applicable

C. Other Program Funding Summary:

OPN BLI: 221000/221005 Submarine Acoustic Warfare Systems

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Cost

10.837 13.504 21.686 20.625 17.492 18.853 26.538 CONT. CONT.

D. Acquisition Strategy: Multi-year competitive contract for the WLY-1 backfit market starting in FY01 has been cancelled. Funds the transition to the
WLR-9 and ARCI Program of a new Acoustic Intercept sensor (SPVA) for AI processing.

E. Schedule Profile: See Attached Schedule

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 176 - 2 of 176 - 5

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 5)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY//BA-7 Program Element (PE) Name and No. Submarine Acoustic Warfare Development/0101226N

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07

Sensor
Development

Acoustic Intercept APB(A) 02

Improvement Test
Initiative - SPVA At-Sea Test
Transition Phase

ATT AUR Commonality Integration

Anti-Torpedo
Torpedo
At-Sea Compatibility
Test

Weapons Analysis Facility CM Effectiveness / WAF Threat Vulnerability

NGCM Next Generation CM

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 176 - 3 of 176 - 5

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 5)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E, N/BA-7 Sub Acoustic Warfare Dev/0101226N Submarine Defensive Warfare Systems/F1265
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development C/CPAF Northrop Grum Melville, NY 37.462 0.000 37.462 37.661
Ancillary Hardware Development 0.000
Systems Engineering C/CPAF General Dyn Groton,CT 4.778 0.000 4.778 5.717
Systems Engineering WR PNSY 0.730 0.000 0.730 0.830
Systems Engineering WR NUWC Newport, RI 3.312 0.583 11/00 0.747 11/01 0.851 CONT. CONT. CONT.

Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development 46.282 0.583 0.747 0.851 0.000 48.463
Remarks:

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development 0.000
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.000
Configuration Management 0.000
Technical Data 0.000
GFE 0.000
Miscellaneous WR 0.196 0.000 Various 0.000 Various 0.000 Various CONT. CONT. CONT.
Subtotal Support 0.196 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.196

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 176 - 4 of 176 - 5

Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, page 4 of 5)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E, N/BA-7 Sub Acoustic Warfare Dev/0101226N Submarine Defensive Warfare Systems/F1265
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation WR OPTEVFOR Norfolk, VA 0.055 0.000 0.055 0.055
Operational Test & Evaluation WR OPTEVFOR Norfolk, VA 0.076 0.076 0.076
Operational Test & Evaluation 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 0.131 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.131

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support 0.000

Government Engineering Support 0.000
Program Management Support C/CPFF RM Vredenburg Reston, VA 1.517 0.200 04/01 0.190 01/02 0.190 01/03 CONT. CONT. CONT.
Travel PMS415 0.063 0.050 0.050 CONT. CONT. CONT.
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 1.517 0.263 0.240 0.240 0.000 2.260

Remarks:

Total Cost 48.126 0.846 0.987 1.091 CONT. CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 176 - 5 of 176 - 5

Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, page 5 of 5)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 4.168 21.452 46.681 42.566 24.634 10.713 1.588 151.802

H0793 E-6 Service Life Assessment 2.899 3.200 1.000 7.099

H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project 4.168 18.553 43.481 41.566 24.634 10.713 1.588 144.703

Quantity of RDT&E Articles Not Applicable

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
(H0793) In FY2003 a Service Life Assessment of selected critical components will be performed on the E-6B. The original service life of this airframe was 27,000 hours based on a prescribed weight and expected
operational usage. Current weight and operational usage exceed those original values and lessen, by some unknown value, the original 27,000 hour airframe fatigue life. The contractor will analyze fleet aircraft and review
onboard recorder data in order to generate an updated repeated loads spectrum. The contractor will then update the external/internal loads analysis associated with the additional weight and operational usage data.
Utilizing the data from the first two steps, the contractor will update the existing E-6 Durability and Damage Tolerance Assessments. This data will then allow the contractor to update the Reliability-Centered Maintenance
(RCM) analysis, individual aircraft tracking, and optimize the E-6 Maintenance Plans.

(H3002) This funding replaces the existing Digital Airborne Intercommunications Switching System (DAISS), Very Low Frequency (VLF) transmit terminal, Mission Computer System (MCS), Ultra-High Frequency
Command, Control and Communications (UHF C3) system, STU-III/Crypto, High Power Transmit Set (HPTS), and adds Open Systems Architecture (OSA), High Frequency (HF) Rebroadcast, Low Frequency Simultaneous
Operations (LF SIMOP) and other battlestaff and mission system capabilities to the E-6 Aircraft.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY:

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H0793 E-6 Service Life Assessment
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2.899 3.200 1.000 7.099

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(H0793) In FY2003 a Service Life Assessment selected critical components will be performed on the E-6B. The original service life of this airframe was 27,000 hours based on a prescribed weight and expected
operational usage. Current weight and operational usage exceed those original values and lessen, by some unknown value, the original 27,000 hour airframe fatigue life. The contractor will analyze fleet aircraft and
review onboard recorder data in order to generate an updated repeated loads spectrum. The contractor will then update the external/internal loads analysis associated with the additional weight and operational usage
data. Utilizing the data from the first two steps, the contractor will update the existing E-6 Durability and Damage Tolerance Assessments. This data will then allow the contractor to update the Reliability-Centered
Maintenance (RCM) analysis, individual aircraft tracking, and optimize the E-6 Maintenance Plans.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: - Not Applicable

2. FY 2002 PLANS: - Not Applicable

3. FY 2003 PLANS:
(U) ($ .491) Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Field Support
(U) ($ .130) Travel
(U) ($ 2.278) Engineering Support - Define the operational usage and loads for the E-6B configuration, thereby defining service spectra. Identify life-critical locations, determine load-to-stress
relationships for those locations, and calculate critical fatigue lives.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H0793 E-6 Service Life Assessment

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget:
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget:
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 2.899

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: Not Applicable

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

056400 E-6A Series 60.029 73.876 57.099 30.272 20.761 39.440 51.437 211.080

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H0793 E-6 Service Life Assessment
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: SLAP will be a sole source program due to the proprietary nature of the data. This will be a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract. Contract Award is expected in 1st quarter
FY03. SLAP analysis is the precursor to an effective SLEP program, needed to keep this aircraft a viable Strategic Asset.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

(U) Engineering Milestones Initial Report (3Q 05)

Final Report (4Q 05)

(U) T&E Milestones

(U) Contract Milestones Contract Award (1Q 03)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H0793 E-6 Service Life Assessment
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support FFP Boeing Seattle, WA 2.278 12/02 3.301 5.579 5.579
Government Engineering Support WX NAWCAD PAX RIVER, MD 0.491 10/02 0.710 1.201
Travel 0.130 Various 0.189 0.319

Subtotal Management 2.899 4.200 7.099

Remarks:

Total Cost 2.899 4.200 7.099

Remarks: There is no Product Development or Support related to this program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 4.168 18.553 43.481 41.566 24.634 10.713 1.588 144.703

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(H3002) This funding replaces the existing Digital Airborne Intercommunications Switching System (DAISS), Very Low Frequency (VLF) transmit terminal, Mission Computer System (MCS), Ultra-High Frequency
Command, Control and Communications (UHF C3) system, STU-III/Crypto, High Power Transmit Set (HPTS), and adds Open Systems Architecture (OSA), High Frequency (HF) Rebroadcast, Low Frequency
Simultaneous Operations (LF SIMOP) and other battlestaff and mission system capabilities to the E-6 Aircraft.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: - Not Applicable

2. FY 2002 PLANS:
(U) ($ 2.093) Funding supports the replacement of DAISS, VLF, MCS, UHF C3 System, STU-III/Crypto and HPTS, and the addition of OSA, HF Rebroadcast, LF SIMOP and other capabilities
to the E-6.
(U) ($ 1.849) Contract support services for replacement of DAISS, VLF, MCS, UHF C3 System, STU-III/Crypto and HPTS, and the addition of OSA, HF Rebroadcast, LF SIMOP and other
capabilities to the E-6.
(U) ($ .100) Travel requirements to support Program and NAWC personnel.
(U) ($ .126) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:
(U) ($ 9.234) Funding supports the replacement of DAISS, VLF, MCS, UHF C3 System, STU-III/Crypto and HPTS, and the addition of OSA, HF Rebroadcast, LF SIMOP and other capabilities
to the E-6.
(U) ($ 8.745) Contract support services for replacement of DAISS, VLF, MCS, UHF C3 System, STU-III/Crypto and HPTS, and the addition of OSA, HF Rebroadcast, LF SIMOP and other
capabilities to the E-6.
(U) ($ .574) Travel requirements to support Program and NAWC personnel.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 4.205
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: -0.037
(U) FY 2003 PRESIDENT'S Budget Submit: 4.168 18.553

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY-2002 net decrease of $.037 million is for an undistributed Congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: N/A

(U) Technical: N/A

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

056400 E-6A Series 60.029 73.876 57.099 30.272 20.761 39.440 51.437 211.080

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Competitively Award Cost Plus Development Contract with follow on FFP Production Contract. VLF Transmitter will be designed, developed and tested by SPAWAR (SSC
San Diego) under a separate effort. Funds will be sent via Project Directive (PD) to SPAWAR.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones MSII (1Q 05)

LRIP (4Q 05)
MSIII (2Q 06)

Prelim. Design Review (3Q 04)

(U) Engineering Milestones Critical Design Review (3Q 04)
Prototype Install (2Q 05)

(U) T&E Milestones Contract Test/Dev Test (2Q 05)

Operational Test (3Q 05)

(U) Contract Milestones Contract Award (1Q 04)

Design, Develop, Integration

Prod. Contract Award (2Q 06)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development C/CPIF TBD 88.041 88.041 88.041
Primary Hardware Dev. (VLF) TBD TBD 0.000

Subtotal Product Development 0.000 88.041 88.041 88.041

Remarks:

Subtotal Support

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 10)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0101402N Navy Strategic Communications H3002 Navy Strategic Communications Project
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

Government Engineering Support WX NAWCAD PAX RIVER, MD 2.093 02/02 9.234 10/02 13.864 25.191
Engineering Technical Services TBD TBD 1.849 02/02 8.745 10/02 17.566 28.160 28.160
Travel 0.100 Various 0.574 10/02 2.511 3.185

SBIR Assessment 0.126 0.126

Subtotal Management 4.168 18.553 33.941 56.662

Remarks:

Total Cost 4.168 18.553 121.982 144.703

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 177

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 10)
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 8,814.228 221.267 251.772 204.466 148.180 113.300 52.430 11.421 0.000 9,817.064
*
E1662 F/A-18 Improvements 2,968.764 110.253 140.401 97.416 73.626 45.771 15.126 11.002 0.000 3,462.359
**
E2065 F/A-18 RADAR Upgrade 302.768 97.122 110.235 107.050 74.554 67.529 37.304 0.419 0.000 796.981

E2130 F/A-18 Follow-On Variant 5,542.696 13.892 1.136 0.000 5,557.724

Quantity of RDT&E Articles 10 10

*FY92 & Prior: $2511.304; FY93-FY95: $55.765; FY96-FY99: $232.556; FY00 reflects a $5.000M Congressional add for Radar ECCM Improvements, executed under E2803, which has been decreased by $.028M for
a Congressional Rescission and $.061M for a SBIR Assessment.
**FY 1991 through FY 1999 = $272.228. Adding RUG Phase I and RUG Phase II

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 is capable of using external equipment to perform either fighter or attack missions. The capabilities of the F/A-18 weapon system can
be upgraded to accommodate and incorporate new or enhanced weapons as well as advances in technology to respond effectively to emerging future threats. Continued development capability is required to successfully
optimize new F/A-18 weapon system capabilities in the Fleet. Additionally, continued improvements in reliability and maintainability are necessary to ensure maximum benefit is achieved through reduced cost of
ownership and to provide enhanced availability.

F/A-18 Improvements: The F/A-18 Naval Strike Fighter program transitioned from full-scale engineering development to operational systems development during FY 1983. As F/A-18 squadrons report discrepancies and
new requirements, a continuing capability is needed to perform technical evaluations, investigative flight testing, software support, and incorporate Pre-Planned Product Improvements (P3I) (i.e., capability enhancements).

F/A-18 Radar Upgrade: The F/A-18 Radar Upgrade, Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) development program, beginning in FY 1999, is the last of three pre-planned upgrades to the F/A-18 Type/Model/Series
radar. The AESA corrects operational test deficiencies noted in the AN/APG-73. It provides for multi-target tracking, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery, SAR Target Location Error (TLE), and improved spotlight
map resolution. In addition, it provides for greater lethality than previous F/A-18 radars by allowing for full tactical support of existing and planned air-to-air (A/A) and air-to-ground (A/G) weapons significantly increases A/A
and A/G detection and tracking ranges. The AESA provides greater survivability through self-protection and standoff jamming capabilities, while its greater range allows for reduced detection by enemy radar. The AESA
is also more affordable than previous radars. Significant savings in operating and support costs can be realized through a five fold increase in reliability over the AN/APG-73 as well as incorporating open architecture and
Higher Order Language software. Additionally, savings can be realized by avoiding parts obsolescence redesign costs that will be experienced on the AN/APG-65 and AN/APG-73.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS

F/A-18 Follow-On Variant: The follow-on F/A-18 (E/F version) is an airframe upgrade incorporating increased capabilities, performance, and survivability necessary to satisfy the 41% percent
increase in range over the C/D in the high-low-low-high attack/interdiction mission carrying three 480 gallon drop tanks, four 1,000 pound bombs, and two AIM-9 air-to-air missiles. The E/F version has increased
internal fuel capacity, increased weapons carriage capability, increased carrier recovery payload, enhanced survivability/vulnerability, increased growth capacity, and increased engine thrust. It retains all of the P3I
enhancements developed for the earlier night attack C/D version of the aircraft.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade
of existing operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2,968.764 110.253 140.401 97.416 73.626 45.771 15.126 11.002 0.000 3,462.359

Quantity of RDT&E Articles Not Applicable

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 is a multi-mission strike fighter aircraft that is used in both fighter and attack roles through selected use of external equipment (fuel
tanks, targeting/navigation, Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) pods, and various bomb/missile launching racks). In order to respond effectively to emerging future threats, F/A-18 aircraft capabilities are being upgraded to
incorporate new/enhanced weapons systems and avionics including the Positive Identification System (PIDS) (incorporates Congressionally mandated Combined Interrogator Transponder (CIT) Identification Friend or
Foe (IFF) System, Digital Communications System (DCS), Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS), Advanced Targeting Forward Looking Infrared (ATFLIR), development and integration of the Multifunctional
Information Distributions System (MIDS), conversion of the System Configuration Set (SCS) to a Higher Order Language (HOL), development of the F/A-18 E/F Advanced Crew Station (ACS), and upgrade of the existing
Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System in order to meet precision strike/precision approach requirements. Continued hardware/software development is required to successfully optimize fleet F/A-18
weapons systems. As F/A-18 Squadrons report system problems/requirements, a continuing capability is needed to perform technical evaluations/investigative flight testing, provide software support and integrate
selected improvements

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
* (U) ($1.766) Continued to conduct engineering analysis and develop improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during development of the aircraft. Provided technical support for the
integration of new weapons and systems.

* (U) ($7.453) Continued to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, and weapons) and subsystems to include MIDS, AIM-9X,
and TAMMAC. Continued to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action.

* (U) ($9.315) Completed development of DCS and PIDS. Continued development of JHMCS.

* (U) ($27.663) Continued ATFLIR development, DT-IIA and DT-IIB. Commenced DT-IIC testing.

* (U) ($64.056) Continued software conversion from assembly language SCS to a Higher Order Language for load H1E. Continued development of Advanced Crew Station (ACS). Operational Assessment (OA) testing is
planned to commence upon completion of DT testing.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:
* (U) ($1.487) Continue to conduct engineering analysis and develop improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during development of the aircraft. Provide technical support for the
integration of new weapons and systems.

* (U) ($11.059) Continue to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, and weapons) and subsystems to include MIDS, and
completion of AIM-9X and TAMMAC development. Continue to investigate deficiencies and develop corrective action.

* (U) ($.398) Continue development of JHMCS.

* (U) ($42.262) Continue ATFLIR development, DT-IIE testing and commence TECHEVAL and Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR) testing.

* (U) ($81.098) Continue software conversion from assembly language SCS to a Higher Order Language for load H1E. Commence HOL software development load H2E. Continue ACS
development.

*(U)($4.097) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovative Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS

3. FY 2003 PLANS:
* (U) ($1.185) Continue to conduct engineering analysis and develop improvements to existing systems and subsystems for deficiencies identified during development of the aircraft. Provide technical
support for the integration of new weapons and systems.

* (U) ($21.216) Continue to develop and integrate enhancements to the effectiveness, operability, and safety of the F/A-18 Weapon System (airframe, avionics, and weapons) and subsystem to include
MIDS and Accurate Navigation (ANAV).

* (U) ($13.677) Complete ATFLIR development, DT-IIE testing and commence OPEVAL.

* (U) ($37.108) Continue software conversion from assembly language SCS to a Higher Order Language for load H1E. Commence HOL software development load H2E. Continue ACS development.

*(U) ($24.230) Continue development of JHMCS.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item no. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 114.155 136.556
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -3.902 3.845
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget: 110.253 140.401 97.416
CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net decrease of $3.902 million is due to decrease of $2.580 million for a Small Business Innovative Research Assessment, a decrease of $.018 million for Federal Technology
Transfer, and a decrease $5.723 million for reprioritization of requirements with in the Navy offset by an increase of $4.419 million for SLAP. The FY 2002 net increase of $3.845 million is due to an increase of
$5.097 million for AMC&D offset by a decrease of $1.252 million for an undistributed congressional reduction.
(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) Technical: Not applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

APN-1 (E/F) 2837.83 3118.268 3159.492 2997.234 2954.345 3519.538 3935.753 TBD

APN-5 271.051 223.724 421.704 426.281 500.276 461.816 500.941 TBD

Related RDT&E
(U) P.E. 0207163N Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) (U) P.E. 0604777N Navigation ID System, project X0921, NAVSTAR GPS equipment
(U) P.E. 0604727N Joint Stand-off Weapon (JSOW) System (U) P.E. 0404215N Standards Development
(U) P.E. 0604270N EW Development (U) P.E. 0204136N Radar Upgrade (AESA)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item no. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The F/A-18 Improvements program consists of extensive development projects and integration of avionics systems onto the F/A-18E/F that were initially developed for
incorporation onto the F/A-18C/D as the lead platform.
The major programs within the F/A-18 Improvements Line are as follows:
*PIDS. PIDS is a sole source cost plus fixed fee contract on an R&D Basic Ordering Agreement. Will be bought as CFE through the prime contractor.
*ANAV. ANAV is a sole source cost plus fixed fee contract on an R&D Basic Ordering Agreement. Will be bought as CFE through the prime contractor
*ATFLIR. The ATFLIR development was a sole source incentive fee contract to Boeing. Boeing competed the development contract. The procurement supplier is sole source to Boeing.
* Higher Order Language (HOL). The conversion of the System Configuration Set software to HOL will be accomplished by the F/A-18 Advanced Weapons Laboratory at China Lake as the designated
Software Support Activity for the F/A-18. The design of the software will be accomplished by Boeing under sole source contracts. The contract vehicle is a Technical Direction Letter contract at China Lake. As
the Prime contractor for the aircraft, Boeing is the design agent for software of aircraft in production.
* Advanced Crew Station. The design and development of the Advanced Crew Station modification is sole source to Boeing as the Prime aircraft contractor.
* DCS. DCS is a sole source cost plus fixed fee contract on an R&D Basic Ordering Agreement. Equipment is GFE.
* MIDS. An acquisition developmental effort supported by SPAWAR (PMW-159), MIDS is being developed by a consortium of international companies.
* JHMCS. JHMCS is a sole source award fee Joint Air Force contract to Boeing.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE: See following pages.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T), F / A- 18 IPT F/A-18 E/F ANAV SCHEDULE

HORNET

FY03 04 05 06 07 08
NG Box Dev
Boeing Integration
China La ke S/W De v Design/Dev D&D V&V
TECHEVAL
Flight Test
Pax R iver DT
OPEVAL

ANAV ECP
Retrofit Kit De v
Kit Val/Ver
Lot 30 Airc raft
Procurred Delivered

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T ), F/A-18 IPT

PIDS MASTER SCHEDULE
HORNET
Master Schedule FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

F/A-18C/D (CIT)
OTR R IOC
C/D Milestones
DT-IIIB DT-III C /D
C/D DT&E
DT Assi st DT Assi st Opev al R etrofit OT
C/D OT&E
Prod u ct io n Inc orporat ion
ECP 520
R etrofit Inc orpora ti on
ECP 520 R1

F/A-18E/F (PIDS)
OTR R IOC
E/F Milestones
Pre-EMD Efforts
EMD Develop
Qual Testing
DT-IIB
E/F DT&E (C/D Asset s)
DT-IID Te ch ev al
E/F DT&E (E/F Asset s)
OT-II Opev al
E/F OT&E
Product io n Inc orporat io n
Production Incorp

SCS S/W Develop

Desi gn & D evel op V & V FOT&E
13C
Desi gn & D ev el op V & V FOT&E
15C
Desi gn & D ev el op V & V FOT&E
17C
18E Desi gn & D ev el op 18E I Re lea se V & V FOT&E

F/A-18E/F A/C LRIP 1 LRIP 2 LR IP 3 FRP

Deliveries
3
Oct 00

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T ), F/A-18 IPT

DCS MASTER SCHEDULE
HORNET
2000 2001 2002 2003
CY Dec Jan Feb Mar A pr May Jun Jul A ug S ep Oct N ov D ec Jan Feb Mar A pr May Jun Jul A ug S ep Oct N ov D ec Jan Feb Mar A pr May Jun Jul A ug S ep Oct N ov D ec Jan Feb

M C S/W D evelo p m e n t
17C & 18E Build Releases B-1 B-2 B-3 B-3.1

F / A -18C / D F L EET
DT&E a t PAX Voice Rng (15C) VMF R /R VMF Rng Perf (17C)

A J GT --A J Flts

DT&E a t CL CAS Msn R /R CAS Msn Eval (17C)

Aircraft DCS Mods D94 D32 C391 C433

C 153

OT& E with 17C 17C OTRR

8/22 D C S O TR R DCS OT

Install ECP 576 Retrofit Kits Val/Ver - CL 28 in FY01 69 in FY02 6

DCS IOC [17C & V M F] Del DCS Pubs C /D IOC

F / A -18E/ F F L EET
DT&E a t PAX Voice Rng Perf VMF R /R VMF Rng Perf (18E)

DT&E a t CL C A S Msn Eval (18E)

OT& E with 18E 18E OTRR FOT& E 1 FOT& E 2

8/22 D C S O TR R DCS OT

DCS Installations on E /F LRIP 2 (provisions only) LRIP 3 (provisions & R/T) FRP 1

2
Apr 01

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T), F/A-18 IPT

CURRENT NAVY JHMCS SCHEDULE
F ISCAL YEA R 2000 2001 2002
TEAM 2003
HORNET
CA LEND AR YEA R 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Joint Helmet JHMCS

JHMCS
F/A-18 JHMCS F/A-18 JHMCS
LRI P-1 DE C SION* LRI P-2 DECSION*
MS-III Production
Production
Mounted Deliveries
Cue ing System E/F OPEVAL Deliveries
C/D OA
(JHMCS)
E/F DT

LRIP-1 Deliveries LRIP-2 Deliveries

F/A-18 E/F Deliveries

F/A-18 E/F LRIP-2 LRIP-3 Lot 24 (FRP) Lot 25
JHMCS Back Fit JHMCS Provisions JHMCS Fwd Fit
OPEVAL DT Assist FOT&E1

1st
1stDeployment
Deployment 2nd
2ndDeployment
Deployment

Ver Val
18E(I) release to
support IOC
E/F 18E S CS Ver Val OT
Design Develop 18E release

* Milestone Decision Authority: AFP EO/FB / PEO(T) 1

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T), F/A-18 IPT F/A-18E/F AMC&D / HOL

Integrated Master Schedule
HORNET

F Y9 9 F Y0 0 F Y0 1 F Y0 2 F Y0 3 F Y0 4 F Y0 5
-
EMD 845 Prototype
PR
EMD / LRIP
SRR PDR CDR Tech Ro ll Techro ll AMC
AMC (10 )
AMC / 5x5
PDR CD R
FCNS
SRR PDR CD R FCNS
8x1 0D
SRR PDR CD R 8x1 0D

DTI IA1 DTI IA2 TECHEVAL

F/A-18E/F T&E OTIIA1 OPEVAL

LR IP 1 LRIP 2 LRIP 3
De cisio n De cisio n De cisio n
F /A-18E/F LRIP D eliveries
F/A-18E/F L ot 25 Aircraft MS III

F/A-18E/F OFP B-1 Lab S/W B-2 B-3 B-4 H-1 Fligh t Re lea se

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

ACS SCHEDULE
CY ‘99 CY ‘00 CY ‘01 CY ‘02 CY ‘03 CY ‘04 CY ‘05
FY ‘99 FY ‘00 FY ‘01 FY ‘02 FY ‘03 FY ‘04 FY ‘05

ACS
Provisions ACS (w/o 8x10) ACS (w 8x10)
• MIP Prod Incorp Prod Incorp
• Fibre Channel Switch FCS/AESA LRIP 2 LRIP 3 MS III
CDR EMD FCS LRIP1 Decision
PDR MIP FCS Lab & Integ
PDR H/W
CDR
AMC&D Program Del. EMD
LRIP 2
H/W 8x10 LRIP 1 Decision MS III
Lab & Integ
• 8x10D Display PDR Del.
CDR
8x10 OT
SDR 8x10 OA
ACS A/C MOD
(OPEVAL)

CDR ACS & AESA

Proposal EMD PDR D&D Flt Test
RFP First Flight
w/ AESA

CDR
TAMMAC Digital Map Mod (ECP) PDR

DVMC OT

Lot 21 Lot 22 Lot 23 Lot 24 Lot 25 Lot 26 Lot 27

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

MIDS SIAP BLOCK 0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
FY H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2

MIDS LVT Development

(60F
) AQTLRIP 3 FRP
MIDS LVT F/A-18 Milestones
2/15 6/02 6/03
LRIP 1 (48) LRIP 2 (60) LRIP 3 (60)
MIDS F/A-18 Production Deliverie s
F/A-18 C/D
OTRR IOC
C/D Milestones
DT-IIA-7
J
DT-IIA-10
CIET DT-IIIA-1
C/D DT&E
Tech
PVT eval FOT&E
ssis
DT t
Assist OT-IIA-4 OT-IIIA-1
C/D OT&E -3
OPEVAL FOT&E

F/A-18 E/F MIDS

OTRR IOC
E/F Milestones
DT-IIA-11 DT-IIIA-1
E/F DT &E
Techeval FOT&E
ssis
DT t
Assist OT-IIA-5 OT-IIIA-1
E/F OT &E
10 OPEVAL 1 FOT&E

F/A-18 MC S/W Dev

MIDS OPEVAL
17C SCS (MIDS C/D IOC Tape)
C1 V&17
V C2 V&1
V7C FOT&E
19C D&D 19C V&V 19C OT
19C SCS
18E OT MIDS OPEVAL
18E SCS (MIDS E/F IOC Tape)
H1 V&V H1 OT
H1 SCS (High Order Language -HOL)
21C SCS (SIAP Block 0) [C/D]
21C SCS (SIAP Block 0) [C/D]
H4E SCS (SIAP Block 0) [E/F]
H4E SCS (SIAP Block 0) [E/F]

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 15 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

A IM -9 X In te g ra te d P ro g ra m S c h e d u le
1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5

F Y 9 6 F Y 9 7 F Y 9 8 F Y 9 9 F Y 0 0
F Y 0 1 F Y 0 2 F Y 0 3 F Y 0 4 F Y 0 5
T a s k N a m e
Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4 Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 Q 4
M ile s to n e M S II M S III
L R IP D A B
M S I (D e c 9 4 )
L R IP 1 O P T L R IP 2 O P T L R IP 3 O P T F R P
C o n tra c ts

1 C T R E M D IO C
P ro g ra m P h a s e

P ro g ra m R e v ie w s D R I D R 2 P R R 1 P R R 2 P R R 3

F L Y D E M O C T U s F L Y E D M s F L Y P R M s
C o n tra c to r T e s tin g

E M D D e liv e rie s

E D M C T U

E D M

P R M
L F T & E R e p o rt
L iv e F ire T e s t & E v a lu a tio n
L F T & E R e p o rt (D O T & E )
M o d e lin g & S im u la tio n V V & A A ssessm e n t
G L
D e v e lo p m e n t ( D T ) & D T A s s is t D T -IIA D T -IIB /C D T -IID
G L , S C T V T E C H E V A L R e p o rt
G L D T A s s iG
s tL A s s i s t G L
O p e ra tio n a l T e s t (O T ) O T -IIA O T -IIB
O T -IIA O P E V A L R e p o rt
R e p o rt O T R R

C a p tiv e C a r r y R e lia b ility

F -1 8 O F P 1 5 C R e q u ire m e n ts D e s ig n & D e v e lo p V & V F O T & E

F -1 5 O F P 4 M R e q u ire m e n ts D e s ig n & D e v e lo p D T & E O T & E

L R IP O p t 1 L R IP O p t 2 L R IP O p t 3
L R IP D e liv e r ie s

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 16 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 Squadrons E1662 F/A-18 Improvements

PEO(T), F/A-18 IPT

TAMMAC Schedule
HORNET

FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3
4
MILESTONES MS I/ I I MS II I IOC

CONTRACT EMD LRI P #1 LRIP #2 FRP

AWARD

DESIGN P DR CD
R
REVIEWS

EMD / LRIP E&MD PRODUCTION

PHASES
LRIP #1 LRIP #2 FRP
DELIVERIES EMD PRODU CTION

DT- IIA

DT&E DT- IIB

DT- IIC TECHEVAL

DT- IID
OT- II A
OT&E OT- II B OPEV A
L

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 17 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
PIDS/DCS Development/integration SS/CPFF/FFP MDA-ST LOUIS,MO 70.245 3.589 01/01 73.834 73.834
DCS E&MD SS/FFP Rockwell-Collins C.Rapids, IA 16.196 16.196 16.196
ATFLIR E&MD (Basic Contract) note 1 SS/CPIF/AF MDA-ST LOUIS,MO 39.949 39.949 39.949
ATFLIR AWARD FEE (note 1) 0.803 0.803 0.803
ATFLIR EMD (OPTION CONTRACT) SS/CPIF/AF MDA-ST LOUIS, MO 62.703 19.000 10/00 33.348 11/01 8.585 11/02 123.636 123.636
ATFLIR AWARD FEE (note 1) 0.773 0.773 0.773
ATFLIR SUPPORT EQUIPMENT WX NAWCAD-LAKEHURST NJ 9.003 0.200 11/00 9.203
ADVANCED CREW STATION SS/CPIF MDA-ST LOUIS, MO 4.081 15.946 11/00 16.976 11/01 10.088 11/02 10.204 57.295 57.295
HOL CONVERSION TDL NAWCWD-CHINA LAKE 38.085 30.127 11/00 31.395 11/01 5.660 11/02 2.270 107.537 107.537
HOL CONVERSION SS/CPIF NAWCWD-CHINA LAKE 13.802 2.229 11/00 2.200 11/01 0.366 11/02 1.340 19.937 19.937
ANAV SS/CPFF Northrop-Grumman-LA CA 5.770 11/02 1.120 6.890 6.890

JHMCS E&MD MIPR WPAFB DAYTON, OHIO 13.876 2.706 11/00 19.940 11/02 34.034 70.556 70.556
MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT VARIOUS VARIOUS 20.929 0.240 10/00 10.610 11/01 10.391 11/02 13.877 56.047
SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT WX NAWCWD-CHINA LAKE 63.241 21.676 10/00 21.737 11/01 13.350 11/02 37.749 157.753
MISC. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT WX OTHER FIELD ACTIVITIES 2.219 2.989 10/00 10.183 11/01 5.900 11/02 15.924 37.215

Prior Year Costs (Note 2) Various Various 2,567.069 2,567.069

Subtotal Product Development 2,922.974 98.702 126.449 80.050 116.518 3,344.693

Remarks: Note 1: FY99 and prior year award fee earned is 74.7% (ATFLIR)
Note 2: Prior year costs (FY95 & prior) not broken out into separate categories.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 18 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA- 7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E1662 F/A-18 IMPROVEMENTS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation WX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 35.499 7.426 11/00 5.105 11/01 9.593 11/02 20.845 78.468
Operational Test & Evaluation WX OPTEVFOR, NORFOLK, VA 1.713 2.062 11/00 2.946 11/01 6.449 11/02 4.500 17.670

Subtotal T&E 37.212 9.488 8.051 16.042 25.345 96.138

Remarks:

CONTRACT SUPP/TRL/MISC VARIOUS NAVAIR, PAX RIVER, MD 8.578 2.063 11/00 1.804 11/01 1.324 11/02 3.662 17.431
SBIR Assessment 4.097 4.097

Subtotal Management 8.578 2.063 5.901 1.324 3.662 21.528

Remarks:

Total Cost 2,968.764 110.253 140.401 97.416 145.525 3,462.359

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 19 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR UPGRADE
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 302.768 97.122 110.235 107.050 74.554 67.529 37.304 0.419 0.000 796.981

RDT&E Articles Qty 0

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The F/A-18 Radar Upgrade, Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) development program began in FY 1999. It is the last of three pre-
planned upgrades to the F/A-18 Type/Model/Series radar. The AESA corrects operational test deficiencies noted in the AN/APG-73. It provides for multi-target tracking, SAR imagery, SAR TLE, and improved
spotlight map resolution. In addition, it provides for greater lethality than previous F/A-18 radars by allowing for full tactical support of existing and planned air-to-air (A/A) and air-to-ground (A/G) weapons,
significantly increasing A/A and A/G detection and tracking ranges. The AESA provides greater survivability through self-protection and standoff jamming capabilities, while its greater range allows for reduced
detection by enemy radar. The AESA is also more affordable than previous radars. Significant savings in operation and support costs can be realized through a five fold increase in reliability over the AN/APG-73 as
well as incorporating open architecture and Higher Order Language software. Additionally, savings can be realized by avoiding parts obsolescence redesign costs that will be experienced on the AN/APG-65 and
AN/APG-73.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
- (U) ($81.150) Commenced System Demonstration. Conducted Critical Design Reviews(CDR's), Integrated Forebody testing, and radar cross-section assessments.
Conducted Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Quarterly Program Review.

- (U) ($4.511) Pre-System Demonstration component procurement.

- (U) ($.140) Commenced Applied Physics Laboratory workload.

- (U) ($3.000) Continued software development and systems integration efforts.

- (U) ($7.904) Continued radar development/planning and prepared Milestone II decision documentation.

- (U) ($.417) Continued Integrated Logistics Support efforts.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 20 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR UPGRADE

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

2. FY 2002 PLANS:
- (U) ($88.737) Continue EMD efforts and radar cross-section assessments. Conduct Quarterly Program Review.

- (U) ($5.400) Continue software development and systems integration efforts.

- (U) ($12.995) Continue radar development/planning.

- (U) ($.572) Continue Integrated Logistics Support Efforts.

- (U)($2.531) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovative Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:
- (U) ($67.677) Continue EMD efforts and radar cross-section assessments. Conduct Quarterly Program Review.

- (U) ($25.489) Continue software development and systems integration efforts.

- (U) ($13.520) Continue radar development/planning.

- (U) ($.364) Continue Integrated Logistics Support Efforts.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 21 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR Upgrade

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 102.987 115.455
(U) Adjustments from the FY 2002 President's Budget: -5.865 -5.22
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget: 97.122 110.235 107.050

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net decrease of $5.865 million consists of a decrease of $3.147 million for reprioritization of requirements with in the Navy and a decrease of $2.718 million for Small
Business Innovative research Assessment. The FY 2002 decrease of $5.22 consists of a decrease of $4.237 million for reprioritization of requirements with in the Navy and a decrease of $.983 million for an
undistrubuted congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

(2) Line Item 2 E/A APN-1 0 37.3 95.7 106.7 137.2 243.7 291.9 776.34
(1) Line Item 25 APN-5 F-18 (OSIP 38-94) 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.908 280.528

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The AESA program employs a two-phase approach with sole source contracts to Boeing, the airframe prime manufacturer. Phase I is a moderate risk reduction phase
conducted in FY 1999 and FY 2000. During this phase, Boeing conducted competitive source selection at the radar system subcontract level. A BOA order for RFP development and subcontractor selection
was made to conduct this effort. It includes an “845” agreement for prototype development, which includes commercial development/amortization provisions. Conducting the competition early in the program
allowed for focused risk reduction and contractor investment. Phase II will consist of a typical System Demonstration program and development contract. The program transitions to Phase II with a
successful Milestone II Decision in FY 2001. Once the program enters production, the “845” agreement allows the contractor to amortize unreimbursed development costs into the production unit cost. This
strategy fully utilizes acquisition reform initiatives such as: early partnering with industry; alpha contracting; leveraging industry investment; optimizing use of Commercial Off-the Shelf software and Non-
Developmental Item; Cost as an Independent Variable; and Electronic Data Deliverables.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 22 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR Upgrade

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Fiscal Year 1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
MSIIIA

MS II MS C FRP
Acquisition Milestones
LRIP 1 LRIP 2 LRIP 3 FRP LL IOC 01/07 First Deployment
01/01 03/03 12/03 12/04 12/05
02/03
PROTOTYPE PHASE

RADAR SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT SDR PDR WPN
RADAR CDR SYS CDR
PRR PCA
(U) Program Milestones 06/00 12/15/00 07/01 10/01
EDM RADAR DELIVERY
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
LAB FLT
SOFTWARE DELIVERY REL
HI AESA TEST TAPE
RADAR SW DROPS
H-3 SCS SW
(U) Engineering Milestones
BLD 2 BLD 3

BLD 1

(U) T&E Milestones

AMC TYPE II/FCNS
FLIGHT TEST DT-IIA DT-IIB1 DT-IIB2 DT-IIC TECHEVAL
DEVELOPMENT TEST
CONTINUOUS DT ASSIST
FIRST FLIGHT
OPERATIONAL TEST
(U) Contract Milestones F19 F8 LOT 26
OT-IIA OT-IIB OT-IIC OPEVAL

AWARD FEE PERIODS $ $

PRODUCTION MILESTONES LRIP I START
LRIP I FY03 PROD LRIP II START 8
READINESS LRIP III
LRIP II FY04 START
12
LRIP III FY05 FRP
FRP 42
FRP FY06 LL
START

F/A-18E/F Deliveries LRIP II (20) LRIP III (30) Lot 24 (36) Lot 25 (42) Lot 26 (42) Lot 27(42) Lot 28 (42) Lot 29 (42) Lot 30 (42)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 23 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR Upgrade
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
AESA Radar Contract SS/CPFF BOEING. St Louis 4.300 81.150 02/01 88.737 11/01 67.677 11/02 82.627 324.491 324.491
AESA Radar Software Dev/IntegrationWX NAWCWD, China Lake, CA 0.822 4.500 11/00 5.400 11/01 2.600 11/02 13.322
AESA Radar Development WX NAWCAD, Pax River, MD 0.904 10.291 11/00 9.409 11/01 21.152 11/02 0.200 41.956
RUG Phase I SS/LTR(FPIF)
BOEING. St Louis 171.000 171.000 171.000
RUG Phase II CPIF BOEING. St Louis 51.729 51.729 51.729
RUG Phase II Integration CPFF BOEING. St Louis 11.000 11.000 11.000

Subtotal Product Development 239.755 95.941 103.546 91.429 82.827 613.498

Program execution is based on a pre-coordinated replan effort engineered at Milestone C, which is currently in process.

AESA Integrated Support WX NADEP North Island, CA 0.065 0.108 11/00 0.146 11/01 0.168 11/01 0.346 0.833
AESA Integrated Support WX NAWCAD, Lakehurst, NJ 0.309 11/00 0.425 11/01 0.981 11/01 1.154 2.869

Subtotal Support 0.065 0.417 0.571 1.149 1.500 3.702

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 24 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N F/A-18 SQUADRONS E2065 RADAR Upgrade
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
AESA Test & Evaluation WX NAWCAD, Pax River, MD 2.800 11/01 3.300 11/02 50.614 56.714
AESA Test & Evaluation WX NAWCWD, China Lake, CA 10.220 11/02 41.996 52.216
RUG Upgrade Test & Evaluation WX NAWCWD, China Lake, CA 52.956 52.956
RUG Lab Asset WX NAWCWD China Lake, CA 7.964 7.964
Subtotal T&E 60.920 2.800 13.520 92.610 169.850

Remarks:

RUG Contractor Sprt/Travel/Misc Various NAVAIR Pax River, MD 2.028 0.764 12/00 0.787 12/01 0.952 12/02 2.869 7.400
SBIR Assessment 2.531 2.531

Subtotal Management 2.028 0.764 3.318 0.952 2.869 9.931

Remarks:

Total Cost 302.768 97.122 110.235 107.050 179.806 796.981

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 25 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 Squadrons E2130/ Follow -On Variant
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 5,542.696 13.892 1.136 5,557.724

RDT&E Articles Qty 10 10

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The F/A-18 is a twin-engine, mid-wing multi-mission, tactical aircraft employed Navy and Marine Corps strike fighter squadrons. The F/A-18 through selected use of external equipment is designed for
flexibility in fighter, attack, fleet air defense, and close air support roles. The F/A-18E/F variant is an upgrade to the night attack "C" and "D" models. The F/A-18E/F will be the second major upgrade since the
program's inception. The F/A-18 continues to adapt its strike fighter role to evolving threats into the next century. The F/A-18E/F E&MD program is under a Congressional mandated cost cap of $4.883B FY90 dollars.
Pre-development efforts of $36.6M (in FY90 base year dollars), previously funded under the F/A-18C/D program, is reflected in the RDT&E total, but is not included in the approved $4,883B development cap.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($3.228) Continued to develop and integrate mission software.

- (U) ($4.585) Completed integration and testing of avionics subsystems.

- (U) ($4.400) Continued Test Program Set (TPS) development.

- (U) ($1.679) Weapon System Integration Wind Tunnel Testing.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($ .195) Complete integration and testing of avionics subsystems.

- (U) ($.904) Continue Test Program Set (TPS) development.

- (U)($.037) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovative Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY 2003 PLANS: Not applicable.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 198

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 26 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 Squadrons E2130/ Follow -On Variant

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 17.348 1.246
(U) Adjustments from the FY 2002 President's Budget: -3.456 -0.11
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget: 13.892 1.136

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY2001 net decrease of $3.456 million consists of a decrease of $3.279 million for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a decrease of $.177 million for Small Business Innovative
Research Assessment. The FY2002 net decrease of $.11 million consists of a decrease of $.046 million for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a decrease of $.064 million for an undistributed congressional
reduction .

(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

APN-1 2837.83 3118.268 3159.492 2997.234 2954.345 3519.538 3935.753 TBD

APN-6 111.147 148.231 14.039 115.215 38.644 55.686 41.962 TBD
APN-5 10.648 11.548 48.716 48.442 49.645 19.549 21.363 TBD

Related RDT&E
(U) PE 0207163N (AMRAAM)
(U) PE 0604727N (Joint Standoff Weapon System) (JSOW)
(U) PE 0604270N (EW Development)
(U) PE 0604777N (Navigation/ID System)
(U) PE 0305141D (Joint UAV)
(U) PE 0603261N (Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance)
(U) PE 0204163N (Fleet Communications)
(U) PE 0604215N (Standards Development)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 27 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 Squadrons E2130/ Follow -On Variant

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The July 1992 award of the two RDT&E,N contracts to MDA (airframe) and General Electric (engine), both sole source cost plus incentive fee/award fee, effectively initiated the F/A-
18E/F E&MD program. The airframe and engine contracts are incrementally funded through FY00 and FY99, respectively. In March 1997, the F/A-18E/F program received approval to enter the Low Rate Initial
Production (LRIP) phase. The airframe and engine contracts for this phase are Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) for LRIP I and Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF) for LRIP II and LRIP III. LRIP III is a priced option to the
LRIP II contract. The LRIP II/III contract possesses a common incentive profit structure which affords contractors maximum opportunity to implement quality, reliability, and producibility improvements. Benefits of the F/A-
18E/F LRIP contracts include: 1) a measurable profit incentive across the LRIP period of performance; 2) commercial-like long time relationship with contractors which tie customer (fleet) satisfaction to long term
profitability; 3) progressive assumption of risk by the contractors; 4) a single negotiation for LRIP II and III.

(U) C. Schedule Profile: Not applicable.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 28 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 Squadrons E2130/ Follow -On Variant
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Pre-E&MD Activity SS/CPFF MDA, St Louis, MO 81.785 81.785 81.785
Airframe E&MD SS/CPIF/AF MDA, St Louis, MO 3,580.379 3,580.379 3,580.379
Airframe E&MD Award Fee (Note 1) 292.939 292.939 292.939
Contrat OPEVAL Support SS/CPFF/BOA MDA , St Louis, MO 12.084 12.084 12.084
Pre-E&MD Activity SS/CPFF GE Lynn, MA 51.500 51.500 51.500
Engine E&MD SS/CPFF/AF GE Lynn, MA 767.655 767.655 767.655
Engine E&MD Award Fee (Note 1) 48.378 48.378 48.378
Radar Integration SS/CPFF Hughes California, LA, CA 9.887 9.887 9.887
Miscellaneous Development Efforts Various Other 22.144 22.144
Materials Development WX NAWCAD, Warminister, PA 20.302 20.302
Software Development WX NAWCWD, China Lake, CA 59.526 3.228 10/00 62.754
Support Equipment Development WX NAWCAD, Lakehurst, NJ 39.101 3.250 12/00 0.904 10/01 43.255
Maintenance Support Planning WX NADEP, North Island, CA 10.930 1.000 12/00 11.930
Avionics Support WX NAWCAD, Indianapolis, IN 9.502 9.502
Misc Product Development/GFE WX Other Field Activities 151.295 3.031 10/00 0.050 10/01 154.376

Subtotal Product Development 5,157.407 10.509 0.954 5,168.870

Remarks:
Note 1: Award Fees included in the total contract value. FY00 and prior year award fee earned is 96.4%

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 29 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204136N/ F/A-18 Squadrons E2130/ Follw -On Variant
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Flying Qualities and Performance MIPR NASA Langley, AFB 7.306 7.306
Operational Test & Evaluation WX COMOPTEVFOR Norfolk, Va 11.008 0.178 10/00 11.186
Integrated Test Team WX NAWCAD, Pax River MD 253.228 253.228
Wind Tunnel Testing MIPR AEDC, TN 44.410 1.501 10/00 45.911
Misc Test & Evaluation Various 7.108 7.108

Subtotal T&E 323.060 1.679 324.739

Remarks:

Contractor Support/Misc. RX Various 58.908 0.921 11/00 59.829

Travel WX NAVAIR, Maryland 2.972 0.653 10/00 0.145 10/01 3.770
Transportation WX NAVAIR, Maryland 0.349 0.130 10/00 0.037 0.516
SBIR Assessment

Subtotal Management 62.229 1.704 0.182 64.115

Remarks:

Total Cost 5,542.696 13.892 1.136 5,557.724

Remarks: There are no Support Costs.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 178

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 30 of 30)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 55.694 37.247 19.011 9.321 6.480 2.500 1.820 Continuing Continuing
*
E0463 - (E-2C Improvements) 34.379 6.990 7.965 9.321 6.480 2.500 1.820 Continuing Continuing
**
E2321 - (E-2 Radar Modernization) 79.106 12.315 13.411 11.046 115.878

R3007 - (UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna) 9.000 16.846

Quantity of RDT&E Articles 14 14

* The FY2001 budget reflects Congressional Adds for Eight Blade Composite Propeller ($4.000 million), Middleware Technology and Advanced Processing Builds ($5.000 million), Improved Composite Rotordome ($2.000
million), and Network Centric Warfare (NCW) Development, Test and Evaluation in Support of Naval Fires Network Demo ($6.000 million) executed under E2975, E2976, E2979, and E2977 respectively; which have been
reduced by $.120, $.210, $.084, and $.153 million for Congressional Undistributed adjustments. FY2001 budget also reflects $8.000 million to incorporate Specific Emitter Identification into ALQ-217.

**$9.000 million of the 15.000 million Congressional add for RMP Littoral Surveillance for the E-2C has been realigned under project R3007 to support UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

E-2C Improvements provides pre-planned product improvements for the evolution of E-2C airborne warning system capabilities in support of naval warfare command and control requirements. It has previously funded
developments for the modification/replacement of selected weapon replaceable assemblies of current installed subsystems. This has resulted in a new capability configuration referred to as Group II aircraft. The program
has developed a Mission Computer Upgrade (MCU), applying on-going developments in data processing and target detection, which will relieve current bottlenecks in signal and processing. The MCU will permit
incorporation of additional functional capabilities to satisfy evolving operational requirements, e.g., Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), Satellite Communications (SATCOM), and permits the evolutionary growth of a
Combat Identification and Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) Capability.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS

FY2001-2007: Funding provides for evaluation of technology for new emergent systems and subsystems. This initiative allows for data collection and the evaluation of new technologies in the context of
emerging missions and requirements including Cruise Missile Defense, Ballistic Missile Defense, littoral warfare, combat identification including specific emitter identification, multi-source integration, and
Single Integrated Air Picture as well as parts and system obsolescence. Emphasis will be upon the following areas: participation in exercises to assess capabilities against emerging threats; identify
deficiencies, identification of candidate solutions; and ground/airborne demonstrations of the identified technologies.

The Radar Modernization Program (RMP) is a ground and flight prototype test demonstration and risk mitigation of multiple technologies. It initiates the application of new radar technologies to modernize
the primary sensor of the E-2C Weapon system to provide a definitive littoral surveillance capability integral to the Navy's Theater Air Missile Defense (TAMD) Integrated Warfare Architecture. Key
technologies to be integrated are space-time adaptive processing (STAP), electronically scanning array (ESA), solid state transmitter, and high dynamic range digital receivers. The resulting detection
system will provide a substantially improved overland performance, enhancing all current required mission areas while simultaneously contributing to the emerging TAMD mission requirements. The impact
of the dominant battlefield awareness provided by this improved airborne early warning system will substantially contribute to the development of a single integrated air picture. These technologies and
resultant equipment demonstrated in ground environment in FY1999 and will be flight tested in FY2001 through FY2003. The P.E. will be utilized for RMP pre-engineering and manufacturing development
(Pre-E&MD) FY2001 - FY2002 followed by a phased engineering and manufacturing development (E&MD) for RMP, with phase I Littoral Surveillance beginning in FY2003 followed by phase II pre-planned
product improvement (P3 I) which will meet the full Joint Theater Air Missile Defense (JTAMD) mission needs statement requirements.

FY2001 - 2003: Funding provides for evaluation of technology for new emergent systems and subsystems. This initiative allows for data collection and the evaluation of new technologies in the context of
emerging missions and requirements including Cruise Missile Defense, Ballistic Missile Defense, littoral warfare, combat identification, multi-source integration, and Single Integrated Air Picture as well as
parts and system obsolescence. Emphasis will be upon the following areas: participation in exercises to assess capabilities against emerging threats; identify deficiencies, identification of candidate
solutions; and ground/airborne demonstrations of the identified technologies.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for
upgrade of existing operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program
*
Project Cost 34.379 6.990 7.965 9.321 6.480 2.500 1.820 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty 14 14

* The FY2001 budget reflects Congressional Adds for Eight Blade Composite Propeller ($4.000 million), Middleware Technology and Advanced Processing Builds ($5.000 million), Improved Composite Rotordome
($2.000 million), and Network Centric Warfare (NCW) Development, Test and Evaluation in Support of Naval Fires Network Demo ($6.000 million) executed under E2975, E2976, E2979, and E2977 respectively; which
have been reduced by $.120, $.210, $.084, and $.153 million for Congressional Undistributed reduction. The FY2001 budget also reflects $8.000 million to incorporate Specific Emitter Identification into ALQ-217.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

E-2C Improvements provides pre-planned product improvements for the evolution of E-2C airborne weapon system capabilities in support of naval warfare command and control requirements. It has previously funded
developments for the modification/replacement of selected weapon replaceable assemblies of current installed subsystems. This has resulted in a new baseline capability configuration referred to as Group II aircraft.
The program has developed a Mission Computer Upgrade (MCU), applying on-going developments in data processing and target detection, which will relieve current bottlenecks in signal and data processing. The MCU
will permit incorporation of additional functional capabilities to satisfy evolving operational requirements, e.g., Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC), Satellite Communications (SATCOM), and permits the
evolutionary growth of a Combat Identification and Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) Capability.

Funding provides for evaluation of technologies for new emergent systems and subsystems. This initiative allows for data collection and the evaluation of new technologies in the context of emerging missions and
requirements including Cruise Missile Defense, Ballistic Missile Defense, littoral warfare, combat identification including specific emitter identification, multi-source integration, and Single Integrated Air Picture as well as
parts and system obsolescence. Emphasis will be upon the following areas: participation in exercises to assess capabilities against emerging threats; identify deficiencies, identification of candidate solutions; and
ground/airborne demonstrations of the identified technologies.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
- (U) ($6.133) - Collected Sensor Data. Performed Downselect Infra Red and Multi-source Integration Technologies (MSI). Performed Analysis and Requirements Generation
for Future Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) for E-2C.
- (U) ($4.790) - Contracted ADA to C++ software conversion of16.223
E-2C Functional Configuration Items (FCI) software.
- (U) ($1.916) - Improved Composite Rotordome (E2979). Analyzed composite radome options for the UHF Electronically Scannable Antennas (UESA) and supported
composite UESA radome analysis.
- (U) ($5.847) - Network Centric Warfare (NCW) Development (E2977). Developed Tactical Dissemination Module, supported Prototype USS CORONADO, installed
S-Band Phased Array Antenna, supported Program Development, and supported Limited Objective Experiments and Fleet Battle Experiment India.
- (U) ($3.880) - Eight Blade Composite Propeller (E2975). Provided Flight and Ground Test for C-2/E-2 aircraft and Integration Support.
- (U) ($3.813) - Advanced Support Aircraft (ASA) (E2805). Supported the Littoral E-2C aircraft by performing tasks related to the E-2C production and retrofitted to
develop a new mission suite centered around RMP.
-(U) ($8.000) - Developed and evaluated Specific Emitter Identification capability into the ALQ-217 Electronc Support Measure System to improve E-2C combat
identification capabilities.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:
- (U) ($1.707) - Continue Analysis and Requirements Generation for Future ECPs for E-2C.
- (U) ($1.877) - Support MSI Phase I Flight Test Evaluation for E-2C.
- (U) ($1.000) - Develop Advanced Middleware Software for Operational Flight Program Portability for E-2C.
- (U) ($1.394) - Support Fleet Battle Group Interoperability Testing and Evaluation for E-2C.
- (U) ($0.400) - Develop E-2C Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS) software.
- (U) ($0.300) - Develop and evaluate ALQ-217 database.
- (U) ($0.100) - Provide Tactical Aircraft Mission Planning System (TAMPS) support.
- (U) ($0.212) - Portion of extramural program for Small Business Innovation Assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY2003 PLANS:
- (U) ($2.500) - MSI Test and Evaluation in Conjunction with CEC Follow-on Test and Evaluation (FOT&E) for E-2C.
- (U) ($1.296) - Support Fleet Battle Group Interoperability Testing and Evaluation for the E-2C.
- (U) ($1.000) - Integrated Processor Architecture Development.
- (U) ($0.850) - Requirements Analysis for Development of Integrated Communication System Architecture to Support Advanced Sensor Networking.
- (U) ($0.500) - Avionics System Trade Studies to support NCW Architectures.
- (U) ($1.036) - Support Organic Sensor/Resource Management.
- (U) ($0.783) - MSI Development to support Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 23.218 7.052
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: 11.161 -0.062
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 34.379 6.990 7.965

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net increase of $11.161 million consists of a $3.810 million increase for Advanced Support Aircraft and a $8.000 million increase to
incorporate Specific Emitter Identification capability into ALQ-217 offset by a $0.136 million decrease for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a $0.513
million decrease for a Small Business Innovation Research assessment. The FY 2002 net decrease of $0.062 million consists of a $0.062 million decrease for an undistributed
congressional
reduction.

(U) Schedule:

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete
APN 1/E-2C (LI #12 &13) 312.375 275.216 295.451 252.860 324.871 421.542 398.906 6776.439
APN 5/E-2C (LI #37) 49.829 48.498 17.195 90.933 9.559 8.740 8.600 1331.900
APN 6/E-2C (LI #51) 21.733 26.733 4.082 13.040 7.313 2.071 5.750 216.927

Related RDT&E
(U) 0603658N (Ship Self Defense, CEC)
(U) 0604234N (E-2C Radar Modernization Program)

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones 3Q/01 MCU MSIII HE2000 Fielding

Infra Red Search & Track (IRST) Demo
Lasar Radar (LADAR) Demo
Multi Source/Multi Sensor Integration
(U) Engineering Milestones 2Q-3Q/02 JSCIET MSI Testing
MSI Integration
Data Collect

(U) T&E Milestones Ground Demo 4Q/02 MSI FQT 1Q/03 FOT&E Fielding

(U) Contract Milestones 4Q/01 MCU FRP

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware/Software Dev. - MCU SS/CPIF NGC, NY/FL 157.460 157.460 157.460
Hardware/Software Dev. - CEC/MCU SS/CPFF NGC, NY/FL 12.194 12.194 12.194
Hardware/Software Dev. - MCU SS/CPFF NGC, NY/FL 13.998 13.998 13.998
Hardware/Software Dev. Misc. - MCUSS/CPFF NGC, NY/FL 1.021 1.021 1.021
Hardware/Software Dev. - Prior Yr Eft NGC, NY/FL 254.800 254.800 254.800
Hardware/Software Dev SS/CPFF NGC, NY/FL 4.683 12/01 5.406 10/02 10.089 10.089
Hardware/Software Dev SS/CPFF NGC, NY 4.817 08/01 4.817 4.817
Hardware/Software Dev PD NCW, Arlington, VA 5.765 11/00 5.765 5.765
Hardware/Software Modification-ICR SS/CPFF NGC, NY 1.766 08/01 1.766 1.766
Hardware/Software - JMPS/TAMPS C/CPFF TBD 0.700 02/02 0.700 0.700
Hardware/Software - SEI SS/CPFF NGC, NY 7.675 11/00 7.675 7.675
Subtotal Product Development 439.473 20.023 5.383 5.406 470.285 470.285

Remarks:

Government Eng. Spt WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 13.261 13.261

Government Eng. Spt - Prior Yr Eft WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 58.800 58.800
Government Eng. Spt (AIR 4.2) - MCU WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.397 0.397
Government Eng. Spt - ASA/UESA C/CPFF Classified 5.520 0.141 06/01 5.661 5.661
Government Eng. Spt - ASA MIPR NRL, Wash, D.C. 0.600 0.600
Government Eng. Spt - Improvements WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.904 10/01 0.904
Government Eng. Spt-JMPS/TAMPS WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.100 10/01 0.100
Government Eng. Spt WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.350 03/01 0.350
Government Eng. Spt WX/WR NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.694 03/01 0.500 10/02 1.194
Government Eng. Spt SS/CPFF NGC, NY 2.301 05/01 2.301 2.301
Government Eng. Spt (RAND) MIPR PENTAGON, WASH, D.C. 0.300 08/01 0.300
Government Eng. Spt RX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.369 05/01 0.369
Government Eng. Spt - SEI WX/RX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.325 11/00 0.325
Subtotal Support 78.578 4.480 1.004 0.500 84.562

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS E0463, E-2C IMPROVEMENTS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Test & Evaluation - MCU WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 38.578 38.578
Test & Evaluation - Prior Yr Effort WX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 39.200 39.200
ACIS (PMS-440) PD NAVSEA 2.483 2.483
LEAR JET - MCU PD PMA-207 0.601 0.601
Test & Evaluation - MCU WX PMRF, HAWAII 1.500 1.500
Miscellaneous - MCU MIPR Various 0.666 0.666
Test & Evaluation - IMPROV WX/WR NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 2.639 2.639
Test & Evaluation - Contract/Improv. MIPR 0.325 0.325
Test & Evaluation - Improvements WR NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.800 1.351 10/00 0.376 10/01 1.649 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Test & Evaluation - EBC Flt Test WX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 1.380 12/00 1.380

Test & Evaluation - EBC TBD Various 2.500 02/01 2.500

Test & Evaluation WX/RX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 4.600 12/00 4.600

Subtotal T&E 86.792 9.831 0.376 1.649 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Management WX/RX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.091 0.330 10/02 0.421

Travel WX/WR NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.106 0.045 10/00 0.015 10/01 0.080 10/02 Continuing Continuing

SBIR Assessment 0.212 0.212

Subtotal Management 0.197 0.045 0.227 0.410 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 605.040 34.379 6.990 7.965 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E2321, RADAR MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program
*
Project Cost 79.106 12.315 13.411 11.046 115.878

RDT&E Articles Qty Not Applicable

* $9.000 million of the $15.000 million Congressional add for RMP LIttoral Survellance for the E-2C was realigned to R3007 for UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Radar Modernization Program (RMP) is a ground and flight prototype test demonstration and risk mitigation of multiple technologies. It
initiates the application of new radar technologies to modernize the primary sensor of the E-2C weapon system to provide a definitive littoral surveillance capability integral to the Navy's Theater Air Missile Defense
(TAMD) Integrated Warfare Architecture. Key technologies to be integrated are space-time adaptive processing (STAP), electronically scanning array (ESA), solid state transmitter, and high dynamic range digital
receivers. The resulting detection system will provide a substantially improved overland performance, enhancing all current required mission areas while simultaneously contributing to the emerging TAMD
mission requirements. The impact of the dominant battlefield awareness provided by this improved airborne early warning system will substantially contribute to the development of a single integrated air picture.
These technologies and resultant equipment demonstrated in ground environment in FY1999, will be tested in FY2001 through FY2003. The P.E. will be utilized for RMP pre-engineering and manufacturing
development (Pre-E&MD) FY2001 - FY2002 followed by a phased E&MD for RMP, with phase I Littoral Surveillance beginning in FY2003 followed by phase II pre-planned product improvement (P3 I) which will
meet the full Joint Theater Air Missile Defense (JTAMD) mission needs statement requirements.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($6.855) - Completed the integration and check out (IACO) of NC-130H Test Bed, installed Flight Test Instrumentation, conducted Subsystem Flight Test, performed Elemental Data
Analysis/Generate Quicklook Report, and initiated Preliminary Design of NC-130H Littoral Configuration Processing Suite.
- (U) ($5.460) - Radar Modernization Program Plus-Up (E2804). Performed weapon system performance requirements analysis for the E-2C RMP Littoral Surveillance aircraft. Performed
engineering effort necessary to build a 21 channel antenna rotray coupler equipment cooling system, fabricated Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) antenna beam forming device,
provided analysis, designed, and modified an existing IFF system, conducted IACO and demonstrated an existing IFF system, and conducted co-aligned IFF antenna feasibility analysis.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E2321, RADAR MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($1.710) - Complete Subsystem Flight Test.

- (U) ($0.675) - Complete Elemental Data Analysis/Generate Final Rep.
16.223
- (U) ($2.853) - Complete Design of NC-130H Littoral Configuration Processing Suite.
- (U) ($6.774) - Complete Parts/Fabrication of NC-130H Littoral Configuration Processing Suite.
- (U) ($0.993) - Initiate NC-130H integration and check out (IACO) of Processing Suite.
- (U) ($0.406) - Portion of extramural for Small Business Innovation Assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($7.165) - Complete NC-130H IACO of Processing Suite.

- (U) ($1.646) - Conduct Processing Subsystem Flight Test.
- (U) ($2.235) - Perform Tracking Analysis/Generate Final Report.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS E2321, RADAR MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 21.672 13.531
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -9.357 -0.120
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 12.315 13.411 11.046

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net decrease of $9.357 million consists of a $9.000 million realignment of funds to R3007 for UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna, a $0.689 million decrease for
Small Business Innovation Research Assessment, and a $0.054 decrease for repriorization of requirements within the Navy offset by a $0.386 million increase for radar technologies improvements, The FY
2002 decrease of $0.120 million consists of an undistributed congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable

Related RDT&E
(U) 0604234N (E-2C Radar Modernization Program)

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The program is a Non-Acquisition Program governed by a Non-Acquisition Program Definition Document (NAPDD) #501-880C2 dated 16 May 1997 in
accordance with SECNAVINST 5000.2B.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE: FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones 2Q03 RMP MS-B (Trans to

Acquisition Program) HE2000 Fielding

(U) Engineering Milestones 1Q01 PDR 4Q02 Complete Fab 2Q03 Complete IACO
3Q01 CDR
MSI Testing
(U) T&E Milestones 2Q01 NC-130H Testbed 4Q02 C1 Flight Test 4Q03 C2 Flight Test
First AV Flight

(U) Contract Milestones: All Contracts awarded in FY-1998 at Program Inception.

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS E2321, RADAR MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware/Software Dev. SS/CPFF Classified 53.752 5.065 11/00 6.814 10/01 5.492 10/02 71.123 71.123
Hardware/Software Dev. SS/CPFF NGC, NY 15.167 4.800 06/01 4.351 10/01 3.541 10/02 27.859 27.859
Hardware/Software Dev. MIPR Hanscomb AFB, MA 0.748 0.748
Hardware/Software Dev. BAAs BAAs 0.406 0.406 0.406
Hardware/Software Dev. SS/CPFF Kirkland AFB, TX 0.476 0.476 0.476

Subtotal Product Development 70.549 9.865 11.165 9.033 100.612

Remarks:

Government Eng. Support WR/WX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 1.837 0.945 12/00 0.881 10/01 0.683 10/02 4.346
Government Eng. Support CPFF Classified 0.865 0.180 10/01 0.180 10/02 1.225 1.225
Government Eng. Support MIPR Pentagon, Washington, D,C, 0.400 04/01 0.400
Government Eng. Support WX NSWC 0.025 08/01 0.025
Subtotal Support 2.702 1.370 1.061 0.863 5.996

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS E2321, RADAR MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Test & Evaluation WX/WR NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 3.840 1.080 10/00 0.339 10/01 0.710 10/02 5.969
Test & Evaluation C/CPFF Classified 0.895 0.360 10/01 0.360 10/02 1.615 1.615
Lear Jet - RMP PD PMA-207 0.380 0.380
Gear Boxes PD AIR-5.0 0.550 0.550
Test & Evaluation PD PMS-465

Subtotal T&E 5.665 1.080 0.699 1.070 8.514

Remarks:

Management C/CPFF Classified 0.105 0.060 10/01 0.060 10/02 0.225 0.225
Travel WX NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.085 0.020 10/01 0.020 10/02 0.125
SBIR Assessment 0.406 0.406
Subtotal Management 0.190 0.486 0.080 0.756

Remarks:

Total Cost 79.106 12.315 13.411 11.046 115.878

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program
*
Project Cost 9.000 16.846 25.846

RDT&E Articles Qty

* FY 2001 budget reflects a $9.000 million realignment from the $15.000 million Congressional add for RMP Littoral Surveillance for the E-2C program to support the UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna: Develop, demonstrate, and analyze UESA radar testbed concept on the Mountaintop on Kauai.
FY01 effort includes integrating UESA Antenna developed by Randtron, SiC Transmitter developed by Northrop Grumman, ESSS,
Direct Digital Synthesis Exciter by EWA, Console and External Communications by Solipsys, and T/R Switch by University of Hawaii
and Research Corporation of University of Hawaii, Phaseshifter by Trex Industries. NGC ESSS is the system integrator for the MT Testbed.
This effort initially will demonstrate a non-real time Surveillance radar operation, and a real time system by Jan 04.

FY02 effort will include an integrated IFF system as well as advanced digital receivers and supercombiner circuits. Additional contractors
are TBD based on a competitive procurement. Comprehensive real time demonstration is planned for integrated Surveillance
and IFF capability by March of FY04. Extensive work will be done with PMRF for the use of their range, and targets to conduct
the full UESA RTB capability demonstration to assess UESA's ability to meet the Littoral Surveillance needs.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
- (U) ($6.000) - Supported NGC ESSS System Integration Contract
- (U) ($1.000) - Supported Oceanit Power Monitoring System
- (U) ($1.000) - Supported University of Hawaii T/R Switch 16.223
- (U) ($1.000) - Supported NAVAIR/PMRF Systems Engineering and Demonstration Plans

2. FY 2002 PLANS:
- (U) ($2.000M) - NGC ESSS Complete Systems Integration for Real Time system
- (U) ($6.000M) - NGC ESSS Complete System integration with IFF system
- (U) ($2.000M) - NAVAIR/PMRF Range Costs and Systems Engineering
- (U) ($4.000M) - RCUH/University of Hawaii Continuation of Phaseshifter, advanced transmitter, Digital Receivers, Systems Engineering
- (U) ($2.846) - UESA RTB System Support. Various contractors and teams - IDPC system for moving clutter, chiller, antenna install with system, Radar install

3. FY2003 PLANS: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 15 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget:
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: 9.000 16.846
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 9.000 16.846

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net increase of $9.000 million consists of a $9.000 million increase for UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna.
The FY 2002 net increase of $16.846 million consists of a $17.000 million increase for UHF Electronically Scannable Antenna offset by a $0.154 million decrease for an
undistributed Congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: All Associated contracts to be awarded by May of FY02.

Sub-system delivery NGC ESSS: Sept of FY02
System integration at NGC ESSS: Jan of FY03
Non-Real Time System on MT on Kauai: March of FY03
IFF Integration and Demonstration: Sept of FY03
Real Time System Demonstration: Jan of FY04

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 16 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E-2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable

Related RDT&E

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

(U) Engineering Milestones PDR - 2 QTR

CDR - 4 QTR

(U) T&E Milestones

(U) Contract Milestones Contract Awards - 3rd & 4th QTR

Contract Awards - 3rd & 4th QTR

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 17 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware/Software Dev. C/CPFF NGC, MD 6.000 03/02 2.000 03/02 8.000 8.000
Hardware/Software Dev. SS/CPFF NGC, MD 5.000 05/02 5.000 5.000
Hardware/Software Dev. SS/FFP BAE, NY 1.000 05/02 1.000 1.000
Hardware/Software Dev. Misc. C/CPFF RCUH, HI 1.000 02/02 4.000 02/02 5.000 5.000
Hardware/Software Dev. - Misc C/CPFF TBD 2.846 06/02 2.846 2.846
Hardware/Software Dev - PMS C/CPFF Oceanit, HI 1.000 01/02 1.000 1.000

Subtotal Product Development 8.000 14.846 22.846 22.846

Remarks:

Government Eng. Spt WX/RC NAWCAD, PAX RIVER, MD 0.500 02/02 1.000 09/02 1.500
Government Eng. Spt - Range Support WX/RC PMRF, HI 0.500 02/02 1.000 09/02 1.500

Subtotal Support 1.000 2.000 3.000 3.000

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 18 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204152N, E2 SQUADRONS R3007, UHF ELECTRONICALLY SCANNABLE ANTENNA
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

Subtotal Management

Remarks:

Total Cost 9.000 16.846 25.846

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 179

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 19 of 19)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication

COST ($ in Thousands) FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Cost to Total Cost

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Complete

X0725 Communications 5,732 9,095 4,793 4,198 4,024 4,096 4,175 CONT CONT
Automation
X1083 Shore to Ship 7,761 9,013 6,716 7,584 10,081 11,247 10,235 CONT CONT
Communications
Systems
X0795 Support of MEECN 519 2,338 1,067 1,077 889 1,309 1,376 CONT CONT

X9100 Programmable 0 3,370 0 0 0 0 0

Integrated
Communications
Terminals (PICT)

Total P.E. Cost 14,012 23,816 12,576 12,859 14,994 16,652 15,786 CONT CONT

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The Communications Automation Program - This project is a continuing program that provides for automation and communications upgrades for Fleet tactical users.
It includes Naval Modular Automated Communications System/Single Messaging Solution II (NAVMACS II/SMS), Digital Wideband Transition System (DWTS)
Low-Data Rate (EPLRS), Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area Master Station (NCTAMS), Joint Network Management System (JNMS), Automated
Digital Network System (ADNS), and Global Directory Services.

NAVMACS II/SMS develops joint/combined individual and organizational message handling to US Naval ships and submarines, United States Marine Corp
(USMC) vans, and selected Military Sealift Command (MSC) and United States Coast Guard (USCG) platforms. NAVMACS II/SMS develops fleet interface to
Defense Messaging System (DMS) and legacy ashore messaging systems.

DWTS Low-Data Rate (EPLRS) Navy requires a digital wideband capability, which can be used in amphibious operations where a fixed DWTS station cannot be
used. System must be interoperable with Army and Marine Corps EPLRS system. DWTS Block Upgrade BRAVO improves the fixed DWTS station to operate at
higher bandwidths with greater reliability than the current system. Begin concept exploration for extending DWTS and EPLRS line-of-sight to meet ORD
requirements under the Seabridge initiative.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 1 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication

The Joint Network Management System is a CINC, Commander, Joint Forces (CJF) joint communications planning system with Department of the Army as the
Executive Agent. It is intended to be an automated software system including capabilities for planning and engineering, monitoring, control and reconfigurations,
spectrum management and security.

ADNS provides automated routing and switching of Tactical and Strategic C4I data via Transmission Control Protocol (TCP/IP) networks linking deployed Battle
Group units with each other and with the DISN ashore via multiple Radio Frequency (RF) paths. Consists of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) non-developmental
Joint Tactical Architecture (JTA) compliant hardware (routers, processors, switches) and commercial Y2K compliant software (VxWorks toolkit) in a standardized,
scalable shock qualified rack design. Provides Internet Protocol (IP) connectivity afloat and ashore. Merges multiple redundant stove pipe communications circuits
and efficiently manages RF assets resulting in better throughput using existing RF media. Line includes Network Operation Centers (NOCs) Ashore.

Global Directory Services is a key component of the infrastructure that will be leveraged to support a variety of network operations to include, but not limited to,
Single Point of Administration (SPA) and Unified Account Management; Software Distribution; White/Yellow/Blue Pages; Menu, Profile, and Application
Management; Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)-enablement of applications/devices; and Network Management. The Global Directory Services will leverage the
Afloat deployed White Pages to construct individual ship Afloat Full Service Directories which will create a foundation for further development, over time, to create
a ship-to-shore and ship-to-ship Global Directory Services.

The Shore to Ship Communications System develops communications systems elements, which provide positive command and control of deployed ballistic missile
submarines (SSBNs). Provides the communication elements for continuous assessment of the command and control link between National Command Authority
(NCA) and the ballistic missile platforms. Provides the tools for strategic command and control planning to deployed SSBNs.

Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN) is the Tri-Service transmission system, including land-based segment, which ensures delivery
of Emergency Action Messages (EAM) to our strategic platforms.

The programmable Integrated Communications Terminal (PICT) is a user voice terminal designed to operate with Integrated Service Digital Network (ISDN)
switches and legacy switches to support both interior and radio (external) shipboard communications. The Digital Modular Radio (DMR) system will be integrated
into shipboard communications systems that require remote control capability to the radio for various end user applications. These integrated communications
systems will include both internal phone and internal communications such as the Integrated Voice Network (IVN) as well as external radio communications.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses
engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: FY01: Section 8086 .7% pro rata reduction (-84K), Govt Wide rescission (-26K), SBIR (-161K), MUOS UHF
offload demonstration BTR (-80K), Department adjustments (+2,351K), FY02: FY02: EKMS Tier 1 (-$500K), Section 8123: Mgmt. Reform Initiative (-212K),
Section 8032 FFRDC (-8K), Programmable Integrated Communications Terminals (+3,400K).

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 2 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: See individual projects.

D. (U) ACQUISTION STRATEGY: See individual projects.

E. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: See individual projects.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 3 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Communications
Automation

Cost ($ in Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

X0725 Communications 5,732 9,095 4,793 4,198 4,024 4,096 4,175 CONT CONT
Automation

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

This project is a continuing program that provides for automation and communications upgrades for Fleet tactical users. The Naval Modular Automated
Communications System II (NAVMACS II)/Single Messaging Solution (SMS) is the network centric IP solution for the processing, storage, distribution and
forwarding of General Service and Defense Messaging System (DMS) organizational messages to the user’s desktop throughout the IT-21 Local Area Network
(LAN)/Wide Area Network (WAN). DWTS Low-Data Rate (EPLRS); Navy requires a digital wideband capability which can be used in amphibious operations
where a fixed DWTS station cannot be used. System must be interoperable with Army and Marine Corps EPLRS system. Existing DWTS configuration requires
improvement in order to provide more reliable performance at the highest bandwidths. DWTS and EPLRS require further development in order to meet objective
range requirements; these efforts are combined under the Seabridge initiative. The Joint Network Management System (JNMS) is a CINC, Commander, Joint Forces
(CJF) joint communications planning system with the Department of the Army as the Executive Agent. It is intended to be an automated software system including
capabilities for planning and engineering, monitoring, control and reconfigurations, spectrum management and security. Automated Digital Network System
(ADNS) provides automated routing and switching of Tactical and Strategic C4I data via Transmission Control Protocol (TCP/IP) networks linking deployed Battle
Group units with each other and with the Defense Information Systems Network (DISN) ashore via multiple Radio Frequency (RF) paths. Consists of Commercial
Off-The-Shelf (COTS) non-developmental Joint Tactical Architecture (JTA) compliant hardware (routers, processors, switches) and commercial Y2K compliant
software (VxWorks toolkit) in a standardized, scalable shock qualified rack design. Provides Internet Protocol (IP) connectivity afloat and ashore. Merges multiple
redundant stove pipe communications circuits and efficiently manages RF assets resulting in better throughput using existing RF medial. Line includes Network
Operation Centers (NOCs) Ashore. Global Directory Services is a key component of the infrastructure that will be leveraged to support a variety of network
operations to include, but not limited to, Single Point of Administration (SPA) and Unified Account Management; Software Distribution; White/Yellow/Blue Pages;
Menu, Profile, and Application Management; PKI-enablement of applications/devices; and Network Management. The Global Directory Services will leverage the
Afloat deployed White Pages to construct individual ship Afloat Full Service Directories which will create a foundation for further development, over time, to create
a ship-to-shore and ship-to-ship Global Directory Services.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 - Page 4 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X0725)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Communications
Automation

PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

• FY 2001 Accomplishments:

($1,334) Completed development of emerging technologies (SMS Support Server) which included Multicast NT (ISDS) integration, DMS 2.2 interface
products, and DMDS 5.0 profiler. Completed PCI Front End Processor (FEP) Phase II circuits. Conducted Security Accreditation engineering and
evaluation for surface and submarine SMS configurations. Conducted development, integration, test and evaluation of Fleet SIPRNet Messaging (FSM) IP
interface. Integrated the DMDS 5.0 backend profiler with NAVMACSII Message Processor. Conducted Messaging Architecture evaluation during JUICE
exercise.

($4,398) Began Risk Reduction RDT&E for Low-Data DWTS (EPLRS). Conducted DT-I and MS-II DWTS LDR (EPLRS). Designed, developed, and
tested DWTS Block Upgrade BRAVO to improve radio performance at the highest data rates.

• FY 2002 PLAN:

($1,942) Conclude EMD Phase including ILS development and DT/OT-II DWTS LDR (EPLRS). Conduct concept exploration and component advanced
development for Seabridge concept.

($1,898) Continue test and evaluation of emerging technologies to include SSS Multi-Cast Applications and Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
services. Continue SCI and Top Secret IP messaging automation engineering and testing. Initiate research into multilevel security messaging.

($498) Support testing of JNMS for Integrated Shipboard and Network Systems (ISNS), ADNS, and lab activities for security accreditation of the system.

($3,132) Begin research and development to support major technology refresh to include integration of ADNS and ISNS software and hardware. Begin
development for Integrated Voice, Video and Data within the shipboard ADNS environment. Begin development to support the time division multiplexing
transition. Development required for additional routers and RF interfaces as they become available to ensure continued inter-operability and scalability.
Investigate, develop and test ADNS technology upgrades to incorporate into existing architecture until integrated system is available. The ADNS program
must prepare for efficient insertion of replacement technology being driven by an eighteen month technology change cycle. Investigate, develop and test
Network Management to merge with existing ADNS development solutions.

($1,625) Global Directory Services: Provide initial engineering design efforts for a directory service architecture in the Ashore and Afloat support
communities which support major programs (GCCS-M, NTCSS, etc) and general network environments. Provide development for enhancement to the
R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 - Page 5 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X0725)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Communications
Automation

directory service product. Modify ship data feed to Navy/Marine Corps White Pages and expand Common Access Card (PKI SmartCard) capability and
integrate with Single Sign-On functionality. Develop Directory Services menus and applications including Navy/Marine Corps Yellow and Blue Pages.

• FY 2003 PLAN:

($2,029) Initiate development and test efforts for multi-enclave messaging. Continue test and evaluation of emerging technology and product upgrades such
as DMS 4.0, DMDS, multicast, and GOTS Delta products. Develop and integrate Afloat SCI messaging with Shore DMS products. Continue research into
multilevel security messaging.

($1,014) Continue development and integration to support future technology refresh interfaces. Continue integration and implementation to Genser ADNS
capabilities.

($1,750) Provide continuing design and development efforts that will build an enterprise-wide directory service environment by bridging efforts developed
in FY02. Specifically providing for the development of a global meta-directory service to integrate disparate directory services used throughout the Naval
community. Efforts also include developing a directory service architecture to support the development of Universal E-mail and providing developmental
engineering support for the new functionality that would interact with the Navy/Marine Corps white Pages and related directory service environments.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 - Page 6 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X0725)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Communications
Automation

OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Cost

OPN Line 3050 – Comm Auto - NAVMACS

19,667 16,733 17,218 12,441 16,817 18,706 5,905 CONT CONT

OPN Line 3050 – Comm Auto – JNMS

0 654 3,649 1,097 0 2,853 2,172 CONT CONT

OPN Line 3050 – Comm Auto – ADNS

32,706 22,830 16,532 16,532 3,026 14,819 8,332 CONT CONT

OPN Line 3010 – 52NU Ship TAC Comms- DWTS

5,445 3,824 1,038 7,441 2,510 0 0 CONT CONT

O&MN 4A6M – NAVMACS

1,225 1,034 2,609 2,383 2,321 2,318 2,398 CONT CONT

O&MN 4B7N – DWTS (EPLRS)

110 141 126 478 470 469 524 CONT CONT

O&MN 4A6M – ADNS

2,472 4,904 6,090 5,859 6,402 6,346 6,198 CONT CONT

O&MN 4A6M – JNMS

0 1,116 1,093 1,166 1,174 1,190 1,227 CONT CONT

C. Acquisition Strategy: N/A

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 - Page 7 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X0725)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Communications
Automation

D. Schedule Profile:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

Program Milestones

T & E Milestones 2Q DWTS TECHEVAL Block A 4Q EPLRS DT/OT

4Q DWTS TECHEVAL Block B

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 - Page 8 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X0725)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) Date:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT Fleet Communications PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER: X0725
0204163N Communications Automation
Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
Method Activity & FY00 FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location and Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
PYs
Cost
240 Engineering Development WX SSC, San Diego 685 2,385 10/00 828 10/01 CONT CONT
240 Engineering Development CPFF BAH 348
240 Engineering Development Various Various 329 Var 127 Var CONT CONT
240 Engineering Development WX SSC, Charleston 1,856 313 1,649 12/01 CONT CONT
240 Engineering Development CPFF MAXIM 630 10/02 CONT CONT

Primary Hardware Development WX SSC, Charleston 107

Primary Hardware Development Various DSCC 617
Primary Hardware Development WXs SSC, San Diego 795 1,295 Var
Prime Mission Product Various SSC, San Diego 1,023 12/01 474 12/02 CONT CONT
Prime Mission Product Various SSC, Charleston 853 10/02
Prime Mission Product Various SSC, Charleston 1,034 12/01 244 12/02 CONT CONT
Software Development Various Various N/A 5/01 1,639 12/01 1,638 12/02 CONT CONT
Subtotal Product Development 4,630 4,100 6,300 3,839 CONT CONT
Remarks:

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 9 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0725

Contract Performing FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & and FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Prior Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
400 System T&E WX SSC, Charleston 10/00
400 System T&E WX SSC, San Diego 1,407 10/00 782 12/01 CONT CONT
400 System T&E WX Various 350 12/01
400 System T&E WX SSC, Charleston 10/00 366 12/01
400 System T&E WX SSC, San Diego 37 146 12/02 CONT CONT
400 System T&E N/A OPTEVFOR 315 12/01 60 12/02
400 System T&E Var SSC, Charleston 756 12/01 97 12/02
Subtotal T&E 37 1,407 2,203 669
Remarks

210 Project Management WX SSC, San Diego 749 225 10/00 343 10/01 CONT CONT CONT
210 Project Management CPFF BAH 350 249 12/01 102 12/02 CONT CONT
210 Project Management CPFF BAH 10/00 183 12/02 CONT CONT

Subtotal Management 1,099 225 592 285

Remarks

Total Cost 5,766 5,732 9,095 4,793

Remarks

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 10 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: Shore to Ship
Communication System

Cost ($ in Thousands) FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Cost to Complete Total Cost

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

X1083 Shore to Ship 7,761 9,013 6,716 7,584 10,081 11,247 10,235 CONT. CONT.
Communications System

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

This project develops communications systems elements that provide positive command and control of deployed ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and fleet
submarine broadcast connectivity to SSNs and SSBNs. This program provides enhancements to the shore-to-ship transmitting systems and the Submarine Low
Frequency (LF)/Very Low Frequency (VLF) Versa Module Eurocard (VME) Receiver (SLVR) System. This project also provides submarine unique
capabilities to the Network Operation Center (NOC) and Broadcast Command Authority (BCA). The NOC and the BCA provide the oversight and control for
all fixed submarine broadcasts. Evaluation of this communications system performance is provided via the Strategic Communications Assessment Program
(SCAP) and the Continued Evaluation Program (CEP) that provides constant assessment of the effectiveness of the end-to-end network. Submarine
Communications Support System (SCSS) accomplishes the integration of component systems into single radio room configuration. Phase I integration and land-
based test of SCSS was completed during FY01, at sea testing will be completed in FY02 and the follow on phase II efforts have been renamed Common
Submarine Radio Room (CSRR). In support of the CSRR, multifunctional crypto system (MCS) is being developed. This project contributes to the
development and certification of the MCS. Technologies to improve high voltage insulators, bushings and antenna components used in the Fixed VLF (FVLF)
transmit systems are evaluated and tested through the High Voltage Improvement Program (HVIP). Composite bushings take advantage of new material
technology to replace aging expensive ceramic bushings.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• ($323) Continued high voltage and antenna component development and test. Tested candidate composite exit bushings to replace aging high cost
ceramic exit bushings.

• ($2,008) Continued development of the ELF and Signal Processing integration into SLVR.
R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 11 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X1083)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: Shore to Ship
Communication System

• ($1,413) Completed SCSS Phase I integration and land-based test and started development of the multifunctional crypto system (MCS).

• ($4,017) Continued SCAP, collected data and performed strategic connectivity threats analysis under CEP.

FY 2002 PLAN:
• ($368) Complete high voltage on-site testing and evaluation of composite bushings with focus on development of system to detect onset of corona
breakdown which will provide a heightened protection to present day carrier cutoff systems at FVLF sites.
• ($1,095) Complete SCSS Phase I at –sea testing and continue engineering, integration and test for CSRR architecture and component upgrades and
continue development of MCS.
• ($2,492) Complete development of ELF integration into SLVR and commence system level testing to meet FY03 Virginia Class requirement.
• ($4,039) Continue SCAP, conduct CEP and strategic connectivity threats, and perform analysis.
• ($670) Conduct research and development necessary for integration of shore based submarine unique capabilities at the Network Operation
Center (NOC) and Broadcast Control Authority (BCA).
• ($349) Investigate technology and initiate design concepts for integrated FVLF dynamic control system.

FY 2003 PLAN:
• ($547) Complete development of system to detect onset of corona breakdown which will provide a heightened protection to present day carrier
cutoff systems at FVLF sites .
• ($925) Continue engineering, integration and test for CSRR architecture and component upgrades and complete development and testing of MCS.
• ($4,059) Continue SCAP, conduct CEP and strategic connectivity threats, and perform analysis.
• ($485) Continue design concept and initial feasible studies for integrated FVLF dynamic control system.
• ($700) Complete research and development necessary for development of shore based submarine unique capabilities at the NOC and BCA.
R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 12 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X1083)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: Shore to Ship
Communication System

B. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Cost

OPN Line 3107 Shore LF

30,901 17,362 5,427 17,032 18,921 13,855 11,720 CONT CONT

O&MN 4A6M
10,559 15,676 16,523 18,943 24,039 23,116 22,684 CONT CONT

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 13 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X1083)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: Shore to Ship
Communication System

C. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

Program Milestones

T&E Milestones 2Q DT (SSN)

3Q OT IV

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: See paragraph C.

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 14 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X1083)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

Contract Performing FY 00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & and FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Prior Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
240 Engineering Support CPIF Rockwell, 15,864 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/A Complete 15,864 N/A
Richardson, TX
240 Engineering Support CPFF APL/JHU 24,378 3,659 11/00 3,712 12/01 3,760 12/02 CONT CONT CONT
Baltimore, MD
240 Engineering Support WR SSC, San Diego, 28,571 2,007 11/00 3,085 11/01 1,516 11/02 CONT CONT N/A
CA
240 Engineering Support WR Miscellaneous 6,247 1,285 11/00 519 11/01 624 11/02 CONT CONT N/A
Labs, NUWC
240 Engineering Support WR U.S. Army, 3,790 130 11/00 0 11/01 0 N/A CONT CONT N/A
Monmouth, NJ
240 Engineering Support Various Various 0 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 N/a 0

Subtotal Product Development 78,850 7,081 7, 316 5,900

Remarks:

Subtotal Support
Remarks

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 15 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Item (X0795)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X1083

Contract Performing FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & and FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Prior Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
400 System T&E Various Various 850 297 11/00 1,298 11/01 482 11/02 CONT CONT

Subtotal T&E 850 297 1,298 482

Remarks

210 Program Management Various Various 3,047 383 11/00 399 11/01 334 11/02 CONT CONT

Subtotal Management 3,047 383 399 334

Remarks

Total Cost 82,747 7,761 9,013 6,716

Remarks

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 16 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Item (X0795)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0795

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: MEECN

Cost ($ in Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

X0795 MEECN 519 2,338 1,067 1,077 889 1,309 1,376 CONT CONT

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION

Support of Minimum Essential Emergency Communications Network (MEECN). MEECN is the Tri-Service communication system that ensures delivery of
Emergency Action Messages (EAMs) to our strategic platforms including the land based delivery system components. Because of substantial downsizing in the
number of MEECN assets, such as the CINC Airborne National Command Post (ABNCP) fleet, it is necessary to improve the range, timeliness and reliability of
MEECN communications to maintain connectivity to the platforms. This project identifies, researches, and develops improvements to the MEECN primarily in
the Very Low Frequency and Low Frequency (VLF/LF) ranges of MEECN. The new High Data Rate (HIDAR) mode, which greatly reduces message
transmission time while providing the performance of low data rate modes, has been deployed. Improvements in mode design and signal processing are being
investigated for MEECN application into a common Unified Mode design to support all VLF Strategic Platforms. A new generation of high performance
universal mode will be defined to provide a single standard MEECN replacement to take advantage of new computer processing capability.

FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• ($220) Incorporated improved MEECN Mode into Mode Standard.

• ($267) Incorporated Mode Standard design into Mode Standard MEECN Test Bed for performance evaluation.

• ($32) Investigated applicability of commercial programmable crypto devices to the MEECN transmission.

FY 2002 PLAN:
• ($234) Complete MEECN Mode Standard.
• ($243) Complete verification of Mode Standard performance in MEECN testbed.
• ($ 23) Complete evaluation of commercial programmable crypto.
• ($1,838) Develop a non-AUTODIN based Emergency Action Messages (EAMs) delivery system.

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 17 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Item (X0795)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X0795

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communications PROJECT TITLE: MEECN

FY 2003 PLAN:
• ($466) Update improved MEECN Mode for a simplified high performance airborne transmit.
• ($560) Continue non-AUTODIN based Emergency Action Messages (EAMs) delivery system (NOVA Hybrid Solution) and complete NOVA
Hybrid Solution certification testing to support the FY03 AUTODIN closure.
• ($41) Incorporate transverse electric/magnetic antenna pattern combining methods into improved MEECN Mode.

B. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Cost

O&MN 4A6M 55 525 593 685 655 657 676 CONT CONT

C. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not applicable.

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.

R-1 Shopping List – Item No 180 – Page 18 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Item (X0795)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X9100

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Programmable
Integrated Communications Terminals

Cost ($ in Thousands) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

X9100 Programmable 3,370

Integrated Communications
Terminals (PICT)

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The programmable Integrated Communications Terminal (PICT) is a user voice
terminal which is designed to operate with Integrated Service Digital Network (ISDN) switches and legacy switches to support both interior and radio (external)
shipboard communications. The Digital Modular Radio (DMR) system will be integrated into shipboard communications systems that require remote control
capability to the radio for various end user applications. These integrated communications systems will include both internal phone and internal communications
such as the Integrated Voice Network (IVN) as well as external radio communications.

PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

• FY 2001 Accomplishments: N/A

• FY 2002 PLAN:

($3,370) Combine the Integrated Voice Network and the Programmable Integrated Communications Terminal with the Digital Modular Radio. Design and
develop upgrades to the user terminal, switches and DMR controllers to allow the radio control functions to be remotely controlled from the user terminals.
Integrate and test to demonstrate that the system design will meet specification requirements and is interoperable end-to-end from the user voice terminal to
the radio.

FY 2003 PLAN: N/A

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 19 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X9100)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X9100

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Programmable
Integrated Communications Terminals

OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: N/A

To Total
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete Cost

E. Acquisition Strategy: N/A

F. Schedule Profile: N/A

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

Program Milestones: N/A

T & E Milestones: N/A

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 20 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X9100)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X9100

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Programmable
Integrated Communications Terminals

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) Date:

APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT Fleet Communications PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER: X9100
0204163N PICT
Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
Method Activity & FY00 FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location and PYs Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Cost

240 Engineering Development WX SSC, San Diego 800 02/02 CONT CONT
240 Engineering Development WX SSC, Charleston 1,435 02/02
240 Engineering Development CPFF MAXIM 300 02/02

Subtotal Product Development 2,535 CONT CONT

Remarks:

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 21 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X9100)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E, N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification Date:February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204163N PROJECT NUMBER: X9100

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Fleet Communication PROJECT TITLE: Programmable
Integrated Communications Terminals

Contract Performing FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & and FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Prior Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
400 System T&E WX SSC Charleston 300 02/02
400 System T&E WX SSC, San Diego 300 02/02
Subtotal T&E 600
Remarks

210 Project Management WX SSC, San Diego 150 02/02

210 Project Management CPFF BAH 85 02/02

Subtotal Management 235

Remarks

Total Cost 3,370

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 180 – Page 22 of 22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification (X9100)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204229N Tomahawk and Theater Mission Planning Center
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 92.456 75.347 94.265 60.594 34.156 13.665 13.945 Continuing Continuing

A0545 Tomahawk 90.706 75.347 94.265 60.594 34.156 13.665 13.945 Continuing Continuing

A1784 Theatre Mission Planning Center 94.635 1.750 96.385

EDM
Quantity of RDT&E Articles 10 10

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(U) The Tomahawk Weapons System (TWS) provides the Tomahawk cruise missile attack capability against targets on land (Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM)). The TLAM can be fitted with either Conventional
unitary warhead (TLAM/C), Nuclear warhead (TLAM/N) or submunition Dispenser (TLAM/D). This program ensures that the TWS exploits state-of-the-art technology to preserve the efficiency of this proven weapon
system.

(U) The Tomahawk project includes all missile development, mission planning system development, and submarine and surface ship weapons control development.

(U) The Tactical Tomahawk (TT) missile development covered by this budget provides a comprehensive baseline upgrade to the TWS. The TT weapons program will provide the tactical commander a quick reaction
response capability as well as improved flexibility, accuracy, and lethality.

(U) This budget provides for the Tomahawk Command and Control System (TC2S) Theater Mission Planning Center (TMPC) and Afloat Planning System (APS), a shipboard version of TMPC. TMPC and APS provide
mission planning and employment support information for both the nuclear (TMPC only) and conventional TLAM. This project also supports the distribution of mission data and command information essential to TLAM
employment via the Mission Distribution System (MDS) and associated communications infrastructure. TMPC and APS software development decreases mission planning time and increases the quality and accuracy of
each mission for Block II and III TLAM. The development of Tactical Tomahawk capabilities in TMPC/APS/MDS includes software development, integration, test, and delivery; support for TECHEVAL and OPEVAL;
development of training; installation planning; and simulation/model development required by COMOPTEVFOR to offset live missile flights in TECHEVAL and OPEVAL. This project includes development required by
future national and tactical imagery architectures.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204229N Tomahawk and Theater Mission Planning Center

(U) The Tomahawk Weapons Control System provides launch capability for surface and submarine platforms. Submarine ATWCS Block 1/C Mod 0/1 completed IOC in FY01. Tactical Tomahawk
Weapons Control System entered Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) in FY99 with Phase 1A IOC planned for FY03.

(U) These efforts provide battle-group tactical flexibility and responsiveness while maximizing TWS wartime capability.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for
upgrade of existing, operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 90.706 75.347 94.265 60.594 34.156 13.665 13.945 Continuing Continuing
EDM
RDT&E Articles Qty 10 10

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(U) The TOMAHAWK Cruise Missile has been designed to accurately attack land targets from seaborne platforms at great distances from the launch platform. The Tomahawk Land-Attack Missile (TLAM) can be
produced with either a single Conventional warhead (TLAM/C), a submunition Dispenser (TLAM/D), or a Nuclear warhead (TLAM/N).

(U) The Tomahawk development program (Project A0545) contains all costs for the Tactical Tomahawk (TT) program including the missile, weapons control systems, both surface ship and submarine, and
Tomahawk Command and Control Systems (TC2S).

(U) The TT missile development covered by this budget provides a comprehensive baseline upgrade to the Tomahawk Weapon System including the missile, weapons control systems, and mission planning
systems. The upgrade will improve system flexibility, responsiveness, accuracy and lethality. The essential elements of the TT are upgrades to the guidance, navigation, control, and mission computer systems of the
missile along with the associated Command and Control (C2) systems and weapons control systems. TT will provide a UHF Satcom data link to enable the missile to receive in-flight mission modification messages, to
transfer health and status messages, and to broadcast Battle Damage Indication (BDI) messages. TT also includes a high anti-jam GPS receiver, navigation improvements including Precision Terrain Aided Navigation
(PTAN), and associated antenna systems. The Tomahawk program (A0545) also includes development of Torpedo Tube Launch (TTL) capability for submarines and the development of a penetrator variant of Tactical
Tomahawk (TTPV).

(U) The weapons control development portion of the project is centered on the Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS), being introduced into the surface and submarine fleets. The TTWCS
advancements are increased data throughput, thereby reducing the time needed to execute missile preparation and launch sequences, and improving strike coordination capabilities.

(U) The development of TT capabilities in TC2S includes software development, integration, test, and delivery; support for TECHEVAL and OPEVAL; development of training; installation planning; and
simulation/model development.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($47.177) Conducted Development, Integration and Qualification Testing of Tactical Tomahawk missile.
(U) ($20.417) Incorporated new capabilities in Tomahawk Command and Control systems necessary for the employment of the Tactical Tomahawk missile.
(U) ($23.112) Completed software development and began Government Testing of Weapons Control System. Conducted Phase 1A Land Based System Integration Tests of redesigned surface and submarine
Weapons Control Systems.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

(U) ($42.232) Conduct Contractor Flight Testing of Tactical Tomahawk missile. Complete missile Development, Integration and Qualification testing. Initiate Government flight test.
(U) ($17.143) Continue the incorporation of new capabilities in Tomahawk Command and Control systems necessary for the employment of Tactical Tomahawk, support Tactical Tomahawk Weapon System
TECHEVAL, and continue development of related training and installation materials.
(U) ($14.712) Complete Phase IA land based tests of weapons control system. Initiate TECHEVAL/OPEVAL for Phase 1A. Conduct Phase 1B Land Based and Sea Based System Integration Testing.
(U) ($ 2.260) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research Assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY2003 PLANS:

(U) ($64.682) Continue Government flight testing of Tactical Tomahawk missile. Complete TECHEVAL, initiate OPEVAL. Initiate Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator Variant (TTPV) Engineering & Manufacturing
Development, and hardware/software development and integration for Tactical Tomahawk Torpedo Tube Launch (TTL) modifications.
(U) ($22.102) Continue the incorporation of new capabilities in Tomahawk Command and Control systems necessary for the employment of Tactical Tomahawk, support Tactical Tomahawk Weapon System
TECHEVAL, and continue development of related training and installation materials.
(U) ($7.481) Complete OPEVAL for Phase 1A of Weapons Control System. Continue Phase 1B Land Based and Sea Based System Testing. Initiate TECHEVAL/OPEVAL for Phase 1B.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 88.610 76.014
(U) Adjustments from the FY 2002 President's Budget: 2.096 (0.667)
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget: 90.706 75.347 94.265

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding:

The FY 2001 net increase $2.096 million consists of an increase of 4.135 million for Precision Terrain Aided Navigation offset by a decrease of $1.802 million for a Small Business Innovation Research Assessment, a decrease of
$0.220
for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy,and a decrease of $.017 million for a Federal Technology Transfer.

The FY 2002 net decrease of $0.667 million consists of an undistributed Congressional reduction.

Schedule: Not Applicable

Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete Total Cost

WPN BLI 210100 Tomahawk 0.000 73.975 145.820 299.190 296.430 400.450 440.692 0.000 1656.557
OPN BLI 525000 Surface Tomahawk 43.070 60.384 53.614 41.333 42.890 46.733 31.411 484.470 803.905
Support Equipment
OPN BLI 525500 Submarine Tomahawk 2.823 3.019 5.262 8.795 28.798 28.709 28.549 115.984 221.939
Support Equipment `

Related RDT&E,N: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: In 1998, the Tomahawk Baseline Improvement Program (TBIP) transitioned to the Tactical Tomahawk program. This program is outlined in the Class Justification and
Approval (CJ&A No AIR-22448) signed by the Under Secretary of the Navy on 29 May 1998. The acquisition strategy was to transition the Tomahawk Baseline Improvement Program (TBIP) to Tactical
Tomahawk. The Tactical Tomahawk development program is a cost sharing contract between the Government and the Contractor to add capability to the missile. As part of the development, the contractor
provided an unsolicited proposal with a fixed unit price of $569 thousand (FY99) dollars. This price is predicated on the government pursuing and obtaining a multi-year procurement.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones 1Q/03-OA Complete 2Q/04-IOC

3Q/04-MS III
4Q/05 TTPV IOC
1Q/06 TT-TTL IOC
(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones 4Q/01 AUR System 4Q/02 AUR System 4Q/03-TECHEVAL Complete 2Q/04-OPEVAL Complete
Integration Complete Qual Complete

(U) Contract Milestones 3Q/02-LRIP One Award 2Q/03-LRIP Two Award

Definitions:
AUR - All-Up-Round
CDR - Critical Design Review
EMD - Engineering & Manufacturing Development
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
OA - Operational Assessment
PDR - Preliminary Design Review
TT - Tactical Tomahawk
TTL - Torpedo Tube Launch
TTPV - Tactical Tomahawk Penetrator Variant

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N/TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development

All Product Development Costs,

1974 through TBIP Costs in 1998 2,176.447 2,176.447

Tactical Tomahawk Program

AUR C/CPFF Raytheon, Tucson, AZ 160.758 19.330 11/00 19.027 11/01 5.510 11/02 204.625 204.625
Launcher Integration TBD NAVSEA, Washington, DC 17.372 2.671 11/00 3.400 12/02 23.443
TacticalTomahawkPenetratorVariant C/CPFF Raytheon, Tucson, AZ 10.600 11/02 10.600 10.600
Torpedo Tube Launch C/CPFF Raytheon, Tucson, AZ 3.221 11/02 3.221 3.221

Systems Engineering C/FP Raytheon, Tucson, AZ 6.000 2.000 11/00 1.000 11/01 1.059 11/02 10.059 10.059
SS/CPFF UARC APL, Laurel, MD 11.587 5.035 01/01 3.076 01/02 3.134 01/03 22.832 22.832
C/FP Boeing, St. Louis, MO 3.000 3.000 3.000

Subtotal Product Development 2,375.164 29.036 23.103 26.924 Continuing Continuing

Remarks: None

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
\
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N/TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Development Support Economy Act NSWC, Dahlgren VA 7.256 2.126 11/00 1.261 11/01 0.749 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NAWC-WD, China Lake, CA 7.074 1.352 11/00 0.746 11/01 1.274 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NSWC, Pt Hueneme, CA 3.043 0.152 11/00 0.202 11/01 0.139 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NAWC-AD, Pax River, MD 2.425 1.310 11/00 0.338 11/01 0.522 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NWAD, Corona 0.652 0.390 11/00 0.286 11/01 0.193 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NUWC, Newport, RI 1.842 1.617 11/00 0.501 11/01 0.274 11/02 Continuing Continuing
SS/CPFF SAIC, Arlington, VA 3.165 2.199 12/00 1.279 12/01 1.839 12/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NSWC, Indian Head, MD 1.944 2.152 11/00 0.675 11/01 0.371 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NSWC, Carderock, MD 0.668 01/01 0.907 11/01 0.165 11/02 Continuing Continuing
C/CPFF Honeywell, Minneapolis, MN 1.538 04/01 1.538 1.538
Various 14.635 0.859 0.310 0.402 Continuing Continuing

Other Development
Mission Planning Systems (TC2S) SS/CPFF Raytheon, Arlington, VA 5.100 5.100 5.100
SS/CPFF Boeing, St. Louis, MO 0.650 12/00 1.100 12/02 1.750 1.750
SS/CPFF ComGlobal, San Jose, CA 9.401 12/00 7.505 12/01 12.080 12/02 2.136 31.122 31.122
SS/CPFF SAIC, Arlington, VA 5.465 12/00 3.049 12/01 4.204 12/02 3.609 16.327 16.327
SS/CPFF URAC APL, Laurel, MD 4.246 12/00 4.300 12/01 5.062 12/02 5.106 18.714 18.714
SS/CPFF BAE Systems, San Diego, CA 0.329 12/00 0.600 12/01 0.640 12/02 1.699 3.268 3.268
SS/CPFF Lockheed, Valley Forge, PA 0.326 12/00 1.689 12/01 1.929 12/02 5.210 9.154 9.154
Weapons Control Systems C/CPAF Lockheed, Valley Forge, PA 58.695 20.768 12/00 8.884 12/01 7.556 12/02 0.554 96.457 96.457
Economy Act NSWC, Dahlgren VA 15.393 0.910 11/00 3.324 11/01 1.411 12/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NUWC, Newport, RI 9.364 1.434 11/00 1.700 11/01 1.109 12/02 Continuing Continuing
SS/CPFF URAC APL, Laurel, MD 0.804 12/01 0.605 12/02 0.369 1.778 1.778

Subtotal Support 130.588 57.892 38.360 41.624 Continuing Continuing

Remarks: None

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N/TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A0545 TOMAHAWK
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation SS/CPFF Raytheon, Tucson, AZ 19.574 5.880 11/01 9.618 11/02 3.834 38.906 38.906
Economy Act COMOPTEVFOR, VA 1.603 0.230 11/00 0.400 11/01 0.670 12/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NAWC, Pt Mugu Test Ctr, CA 6.711 1.847 11/00 3.422 11/01 9.743 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NOSC, San Diego CA 0.700 04/01 0.575 11/01 1.506 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Economy Act NUWC, Newport RI 0.235 11/00 0.205 11/01 1.400 11/02 Continuing Continuing
SS/CPFF URAC APL, Laurel MD 0.200 11/00 0.645 11/01 1.170 12/02 2.015 2.015
Economy Act NSWC, Dahlgren VA 0.330 11/00 0.447 1.400 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Various 3.247 0.236 11/00 0.050 11/01 0.210 01/03 Continuing Continuing
Subtotal T&E 31.135 3.778 11.624 25.717

Remarks: None

Management

SBIR Assessment 2.260 2.260

Subtotal Management 2.260 2.260

Remarks: None

Total Cost 2,536.887 90.706 75.347 94.265 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A1784 THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 94.635 1.750 96.385

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(U) The TOMAHAWK Theater Mission Planning Center (TMPC) ashore and Afloat Planning System (APS) provide data base generation and processing, flight mission data, command and control information
preparation, and distribution for nuclear (TMPC only) and conventional TOMAHAWK Land Attack Missiles. The TMPC project designs and develops software to decrease mission planning time in response to
contingency requirements, improves the production of missile data for distribution and provides automated command and control information for employment and strike planning. APS utilizes the TMPC software on down-
sized and ruggedized computer hardware for use in support of Afloat Strike Warfare Commanders. This improves battle-group tactical flexibility and responsiveness while maximizing TOMAHAWK Weapon Systems
(TWS) warfare capability. The TMPC and APS systems will be compatible with the Navy Command and Control Systems and the TOMAHAWK Weapon System. Tomahawk Strike Planning Tools are comprised of two
elements, the Mission Distribution System (MDS) and the Electronic TOMAHAWK Employment Planning Package (ETEPP). The Mission Distribution System (MDS) allows TOMAHAWK users the capability to transmit
and receive mission data updates in a tactical environment. The ETEPP provides the TOMAHAWK user with command and control information needed to employ TOMAHAWK missions.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($1.750) Developed system updates to TOMAHAWK Command and Controls systems necessary for the employment of the Tactical TOMAHAWK missile.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A1784 THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 1.851 0.022
(U) Adjustments from the FY 2002 President's Budget: (0.101) (0.022)
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget: 1.750 0.000

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding:

The FY 2001 decrease of $0.101 million consists of a $.061 million decrease for a Small Business Innovation Research Assessment and a $0.040 million decrease for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy.

The FY2002 decrease of $0.022 million consists of technical adjustment which moved funding from A1784 into A0545.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete Total Cost

OPN BLI 525000 Surface Tomahawk 24.870 24.87

Support Equipment

Related RDT&E,N: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER A1784 THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The acquisition strategy for this project is to maintain contractual continuity to develop system updates to continue TMPC integration of New National Sensors and
Software Architectural Enhancements.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones Annual Fleet Release

(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones

(U) Contract Milestones TMPC

APS

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING
A1784CENTER
THEATER MISSION PLANNING CENTER
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development C/FP Boeing, St. Louis, MO 36.795 36.795 36.795
SS/CPFF GD/E, San Diego, CA 11.342 11.342 11.342
Econ Act NCCOSC, San Diego, CA 4.325 4.325
Misc. Items 1974-1997 34.940 34.940
C/CPFF Lockheed, Bethesda, MD 1.283 1.300 11/00 2.583 2.583
C/CPFF MTL, Classified 1.060 1.060 1.060
Econ Act NSWC, Dahlgren 1.253 1.253
Subtotal Product Development 90.998 1.300 92.298

Remarks:

Development Support Equipment CPFF SAIC, Arlington, VA 1.866 1.866 1.866

UARC APL, Laurel, MD 1.771 0.450 01/01 2.221

Subtotal Support 3.637 0.450 4.087

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204229N TOMAHAWK AND THEATER MISSION PLANNING
A1784CENTER
THEATER MISION PLANNING CENTER
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

Management

SBIR Assessment
Subtotal Management

Remarks:

Total Cost 94.635 1.750 96.385

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 181

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 14)
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X0766 IUSS Detect/

Classif System 23,995 20,056 20,405 22,797 25,506 27,590 27,502 CONT. CONT.

X0758 SURTASS 11,843 8,530 CONT. CONT.

X9102 IUSS Mission

Planning 6,740

X9103 FDS 2,973

TOTAL 35,838 38,299 20,405 22,797 25,506 27,590 27,502 CONT. CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This Program Element (P.E.) comprises four projects -
X0766, X0758, X9102 and X9103. Project X0766 provides for Integrated Undersea Surveillance Systems (IUSS) Research
and Development Projects. Project X0758 is for the Surveillance Towed Array Sensor (SURTASS) development efforts.
IUSS provides the Navy with its primary means of submarine detection both nuclear and diesel. The program has
undergone a major transition from emphasis on maintaining a large dispersed surveillance force keyed to detection
and tracking of submarines to a much smaller force that is effective against modern diesel and nuclear submarines in
regional/littoral or broad ocean areas of interest. This transition preserves the ability to continue open ocean
surveillance. Beginning in FY03, Project X0758 budget is being moved to Project X0766 line. Projects X9102 and
X9103 are Congressional Plus Ups that support development efforts for IUSS.

(U) The IUSS Research and Development project (X0766) funds Fixed Surveillance Systems (FSS), which encompasses the
Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS), the Surveillance Direction System (SDS), and the Fixed Distributed System (FDS),
as well as SURTASS Low Frequency Active (LFA) developments. SOSUS processing sites have been converted to SDS/SSIPS
(Shore Signal and Information Processing Segment) to significantly lower life cycle costs and enable system-wide
consolidation. SURTASS LFA will provide an active adjunct capability for IUSS passive and tactical sensors to assist
in countering the quieter diesel and nuclear threats of the 1990s and beyond. The LFA tasks are directed at
detection of slow quiet threats in harsh littoral waters.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-1 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System

(U) In order to continue with reductions in life cycle costs and continue with system-wide consolidation, a long-
term goal is to develop a single IUSS processor based on NAVSEA’s Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion (ARCI) program. The
IUSS Common processor will have the capability to process and display data from future underwater systems (such as
the Advanced Deployable System (ADS) and FDS-C). The IUSS Common processor will also have the capability to replace
the legacy systems (SSIPS, SDS, and SURTASS) as they reach end of life and require upgrading.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: Budget Activity 7: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing operational systems.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-2 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACUTALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X0766 IUSS
Detect/Classif System

TOTAL 23,995 20,056 20,405 22,797 25,506 27,590 27,502 CONT. CONT.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The SURTASS project comprises the mobile, tactical arm of the
Integrated Undersea Surveillance System, providing long range detection and cueing for tactical weapons platforms against
both diesel and nuclear powered submarines. SURTASS also provides the undersea surveillance necessary to support
regional conflicts and sea-lane protection. SURTASS has experienced recent passive and active success against diesel
submarines operating in shallow water. SURTASS is greatly reducing costs by consolidating logistics support, using Non-
Developmental Items and commercial hardware, and increasing operator efficiency through computer aided detection and
classification processing. SURTASS development efforts include: twin-line array processing, improved detection and
classification/passive automation to counter quieter threats; additional signal processing and bi-static active
capability; integrated active and passive operations; improved Battle Group support; and improved information processing.
Functional improvements are delivered to the Fleet in software "Builds". Future builds will be based upon the Advanced
Processor Build (APB) process begun by the NAVSEA Submarine USW program. APB-99 will be used to support an ARCI(I)
Engineering Development Model (EDM) demonstration system, providing A-180R long-line processing only. APB-01 was used
for the production ARCI(I) systems for all long-line arrays. APB-02 will provide Twin-line processing capabilities, and
APB-03 will provide active processing capabilities. Additionally, each APB will introduce new capabilities into SURTASS
systems including improved automation, normalizer techniques, adaptive beamforming, and display enhancements. SURTASS
participates in the process by contributing algorithms for consideration, supplying peer group members for review of
candidate algorithms, participating in test evolutions, and incorporating improved algorithms into operational systems.
LFA will provide an active adjunct capability for IUSS passive and tactical sensors to counter the quieter diesel and
nuclear threats of the 1990s and beyond. The LFA tasks are directed at detection of slow quiet threats in harsh littoral
waters. Improvements include Twin-Line/LFA integration enhancements; advanced waveforms for littoral/shallow water
operations including doppler sensitive waveforms; and processing algorithms to reduce clutter and reverberation false
alarms in shallow water. Also includes Adaptive Beamforming; Integration of tactical decision aids for LFA monostatic and
bistatic operation; integration of SURTASS active and passive information processing systems to provide contact
association and geographic tracking; and common antisubmarine warfare (ASW) OMI and environmental processing. The LFA
task includes development and testing of a compact LFA transmit source array for SWATH-P ships.

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 182-3 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

B. (U) PD18 is involved with the development and maintenance of various IUSS systems. These systems include FDS, FDS-C,
SDS, SURTASS, and ADS. The near term objective is to obtain a common Operator Machine Interface (OMI) among currently
fielded systems. The long-term goal is to develop a single IUSS processor baseline, with minor maintenance efforts
continuing on fielded systems. The existing system architecture, signal processing, contract management, and reporting
requirements will be evaluated as well as the requirements for future systems. The development of the IUSS processor will
take advantage of automation advancement, array technology improvements, and IUSS, submarine, and surface USW system
commonality.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 Accomplishments:

• (9,364) Developed fiber optic sensor technology for a long life all optical underwater surveillance system.

• (4,833) Developed/expanded the collaborative planning functionality of WeCAN to include other multi-mission
warfare areas.

• (3,138) Continued design and development of software to transition IUSS to a common processing architecture(ARCI).
Verify design and functionality via in lab demonstration testing and sea tests.

• (3,260) Continued LFA development for T-AGOS 23 and to improve performance in shallow water/littoral regions to
support ARG operations. Planned LFA Cory shakedown tests to verify system operability and operator training.

• (1,200) Continued scientific research program to support operational deployment of LFA.

• (500) Continued integration of IUSS into the Fleet C4ISR architecture.

• (1,000) Conducted trade-off analysis for LLFA array, processing, array handling and ship modification.

• (700) Conducted trade-off and mission studies to explore networked ASW system concepts, investment alternatives
and development of a community-wide strategy for common performance models.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-4 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

2. (U) FY 2002 PLANS

• (1,887) FSS – Continue design and development of software and perform hardware evaluations to transition IUSS to
a common processing architecture. Verify design and functionality via in lab demonstration testing.

• (1,866) LFA MSIII – Conduct T-23 development testing/Operational Testing (DT/OT) certification testing. Correct
software issues uncovered during testing.

• (3,099) Common Acoustic Processor – Complete development of SURTASS ARCI(I) capability for all single line
array types. Develop software for Twin-Line processing in the ARCI(I) architecture.

• (1,828) Surveillance System Integration – Continue integration of SURTASS ARCI(I) capability with IUSS legacy
systems. Integrate future ARCI(I), Comms, and TDA improvements.

• (2,679) Active Acoustics – Continue implementation of a multi-year sea test program focused on CONOPS and the
physics of shallow water. Develop improvements for LFA operations in shallow water, conduct analysis,
simulations, and trade-off studies to define the optimum configuration of shallow water sources, including
frequency diversity and power levels, source technology, array handling configurations/platforms. Continue sea
test program to support system improvements and demonstrate/validate operational concepts.

• (1,200) LFA Environmentals – Continue environmental research on the effect of low frequency active sonar on
marine mammals.

• (1,100) N74 ASW Study – Continue conducting trade-off and mission studies to explore networked ASW system
concepts, investment alternatives and development of a community-wide strategy for common performance models.

• (200) ASWC4I – Continue performing engineering, analysis and trade-offs; conduct proof of concept
testing to support IUSS integration into the Navy’s C4I architecture, including IT-21 implementation. Continue
supporting IUSS C4I IPT. Coordinate the development of GCCS-M ASW Tactical Decision Aids (TDAs). Define ASWC4I
system concepts, system interfaces and architecture.

• (250) System Engineering – Provide system level engineering across IUSS programs. Translate Fleet requests
into system level design solutions.

• (5,947) WECAN – Expand capability of WECAN collaborative planning functionality to include other multi-mission
warfare areas. Provide WECAN functionality to new ASW platforms.
R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-5 of 182-22
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

3. (U) FY 2003 PLANS

• (2,944) FSS – Continue design and development of software and perform hardware evaluations to transition IUSS to
a common processing architecture. Verify design and functionality via in lab demonstration testing. Efforts
are site-specific development/integration to accommodate the new hardware.

• (1,825) LFA MSIII – Continue T-23 development testing/Operational Testing (DT/OT) certification testing.
Correct software issues uncovered during testing.

• (3,066) Common Acoustic Processor – Continue software development for Twin-Line processing in the ARCI(I)
architecture. Add APB improvements to single line ARCI(I) capability.

• (1,300) Surveillance System Integration – Continue integration of SURTASS ARCI(I) capability with IUSS legacy
systems. Continue integration of future ARCI(I), Comms, and TDA improvements.

• (2,531) Active Acoustics – Continue implementation of a multi-year sea test program focused on CONOPS and the
physics of shallow water. Continue development of improvements for LFA operations in shallow water, conduct
analysis, simulations, and trade-off studies to define the optimum configuration of shallow water sources,
including frequency diversity and power levels, source technology, array handling configurations/platforms.
Continue sea test program to support system improvements and demonstrate/validate operational concepts.

• (600) LFA Environmentals – Continue environmental research on the effect of low frequency active sonar on
marine mammals.

• (1,074) N74 ASW Study – Continue conducting trade-off and mission studies to explore networked ASW system
concepts, investment alternatives and development of a community-wide strategy for common performance models.

• (200) ASWC4I – Continue performing engineering, analysis and trade-offs; conduct proof of concept
testing to support IUSS integration into the Navy’s C4I architecture, including IT-21 implementation. Continue
supporting IUSS C4I IPT. Continue to coordinate the development of GCCS-M ASW Tactical Decision Aids (TDAs).
Continue to define ASWC4I system concepts, system interfaces and architecture.

• (255) System Engineering – Continue to provide system level engineering across IUSS programs. Translate Fleet
requests into system level design solutions.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-6 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

• (1,500) Passive Processing – Develop algorithms and software for signal processing algorithms associated
with unique SURTASS requirements and environments, in conjuction with the SPWG. Optimize processing and
displays for specific threat missions to improve operator recognition. Participation in SDWG and
related working groups (SPWG, COSG, DFWG, TEASG, etc.). Identification of open and closed IUSS data
sets for conduct of APB Step 2 and Step 3 evaluations.

• (1,250) Sonar Automation – Develop automated tools to reduce operator workload caused by increased beam
count and high clutter in shallow water. Develop algorithms and software for alerting operators to
threat signals, monitoring of low priority beams and frequency space to support link management
concepts, acoustic signature formation tuned to SURTASS environments and arrays, target passive ranging,
auto tracking and reporting, and surface ship identification for decluttering, in conjunction with the
AWG. Participation in the AWG and related APB efforts. Identification of open and closed IUSS data
sets for conduct of APB Step 2 and Step 3 evaluations.

• (2,620) TB-29A/Twin-Line – Continue processing improvements to support TB-29A operations and expand
array interoperability. Develop across platform telemetry architecture. Continue work to implement
twin-line to long-line conversion capabilities, including processing and hardware changes.

• (1,240) Shore Processing – Continue incorporation of OMI Commonality Working group guidance. Continue
development of Link Management functionality. Develop shore processing capability for TB-29A array and
off-board sensors.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 2001: Section 8086 .7% Pro-Rata Reduction (-$176K), Congressional Plus-Up WECAN Tech to Other Warfare Areas
and Domain (+$5,000K), Congressional Plus-Up Advanced Deployable System (+$9,500K), Government-Wide Rescission
Issue 63334 (-$55K), Miscellaneous Navy Adjustments (-$148K), SBIR Assessment (-$522K), BTR CTO Synthetic
Aperture Sonar (-$207K).

FY 2002: Congressional Plus-Up WECAN WEB CENTRIC ASW NET (+$6,000K), Section 8123 Management Reform Initiative
(-$179K).

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-7 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
OPN# 2225 0 0 2,000 7,000 7,000 0 0 CONT. CONT.
OMN 1C3C 26,361 28,916 30,674 32,753 38,863 39,793 40,853 CONT. CONT.
OPN# 2237 5,457 17,494 20,639 20,670 29,160 25,760 18,000 CONT. CONT.

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0204311N(Integrated Surveillance System)
(U) PE 0603785N(Combat Systems Oceanographic Performance Assessment)
(U) PE 0603747N(Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology)

D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
Program
Milestones

Engineering ARCI A-180R ARCI PBA/RDA ARCI TB29/TL

Milestones VARIANT 7/01 VARIANT 7/02 ARCI TL
VARIANT 7/03

T&E SEA TEST T-23 SEA TESTS

Milestone ARCI A180R DT-5/03
VARIANT 9/01 SEA TEST

Contract T-AGOS 23 ARCI (I) ARCI TB29/TL

Milestones DLVRY 3/01 PROCUREMENT VARIANT 9/03

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-8 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1)

RDT&E/Budget Activity 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N SURTASS x0766
Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Cost Target
Cost Categories Method & Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award To Total Value
Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Of
Contract
WeCAN CPFF/ ORINCON/Var
WX 0 4,833 Apr-01 5,947 Apr-02 0 10,780
FDS/AODS CPFF/ TBD
WX 0 8,000 Sep-01 0 0 8,000
IUSS Common
Architecture/Surv DSR/LM/ARL/Var
eillance System CPFF
Integration/
System Eng. 24,148 4,181 Nov-00 6,611 Oct-01 6,905 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Environmental WR ONR/Various
Research
5,500 1,200 Nov-00 1,200 Nov-01 600 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
LFA CPFF/ RSC/LS/DSR/Var
Improvements/LFA WX
MS III/Active
Acoustics 80,555 1,515 Nov-00 2,432 Nov-01 2,206 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
C4I Integration CPFF/WX Various 31,278 115 Nov-00 150 Nov-01 150 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
N74 ASW Study WX/PD NUWC/APL 0 700 Nov-00 1,100 Nov-01 1,074 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Various WX Various 28,457 0 0 28,457
Subtotal Product
Development
169,938 20,544 17,440 10,935 Cont. Cont.
Remarks:
ORINCON= San Diego, CA
Litton= Woodland Hills, CA
RSC= Raytheon Systems Co. Portsmouth, RI
LM= Lockheed Martin, Manassas, VA
TRW=TRW Systems Div., San Diego, CA
L/S= Lockheed Sanders, Nashua, NH
DSR = Digital System Resources, Fairfax, VA

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-9 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2)

RDT&E/Budget Activity 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N SURTASS x0766
Con- Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Cost Target
tract Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award To Total Value of
Cost Categories Method Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost
& Type Complete Contract
IUSS Common WX Various
Arch.
/Surveillance
System Int. 990 0 N/A 0 N/A 160 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
LFA CPFF TRW/Various
Improvements/
LFA MSIII Active
Acoustics 2,930 625 Nov-00 450 Nov-01 500 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
C4ISR CPFF TRW/Various
Integration 1,534 135 Nov-00 50 Nov-01 50 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
FDS/AODS WX Various 0 1,216 May-01 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 1,216
Subtotal
Support 5,454 1,976 500 710 Cont. Cont.
Remarks

IUSS Common
Arch./
Surveillance
System
Integration Var/WX Various 651 0 N/A 400 Nov-01 500 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
LFA
Improvements/
LFA MSIII Active
Acoustics Var/WX Various 2,975 1,325 Var. 1,566 Var. 1,500 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal T&E 3,626 1,325 1,966 2,000 Cont. Cont.
Remarks

LFA Improvements/ Var/W

C4ISR x Various 1,437 150 Var. 150 Var. 150 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal Management 1,437 150 150 150 Cont. Cont.
Remarks

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-10 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 3)

RDT&E/Budget Activity 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N SURTASS x0766
Con- Cost
tract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 To Target
Method Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award Comple Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date te Cost Contract
Passive Signal
Processing/Sona
r Automation CPFF APL/DSR 2,200 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Array APL/SSC/
Improvements CPFF/WR Var 1,950 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Processing
Improvements/
Shore ARL/DSR/
Processing CPFF Var 809 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal
Product
Development 4,959 Cont Cont
Remarks:
APL = APL/JHU
DSR = Digital Systems Resources
SSC = SPAWAR Systems Center
ARL = ARL/UT
Passive/Array
Improvements Var/Wx Various 500 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal
Support 500 Cont. Cont.
Remarks

Passive/Array
improvements Var/WX MISC. 1,050 Nov-02 Cont. Cont.
Subtotal T&E 1,050 Cont. Cont.
Remarks
Passive/Array
improvements Var/WX MISC. 101 Nov-02 Cont. Cont
Subtotal Mgmt 101 Cont Cont

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-11 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0766

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

Remarks

Total Cost 180,455 23,995 20,056 20,405 Cont Cont

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-12 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

(U) COST:(Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X0758 SURTASS

TOTAL 11,843 8,530

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The SURTASS project comprises the mobile, tactical arm of
the Integrated Undersea Surveillance System, providing long range detection and cueing for tactical weapons platforms
against both diesel and nuclear powered submarines. SURTASS also provides the undersea surveillance necessary to
support regional conflicts and sea-lane protection. SURTASS has experienced recent passive and active success against
diesel submarines operating in shallow water. SURTASS is greatly reducing costs by consolidating logistics support,
using Non-Developmental Items and commercial hardware, and increasing operator efficiency through computer aided
detection and classification processing. SURTASS development efforts include: twin-line array processing, improved
detection and classification/passive automation to counter quieter threats; additional signal processing and bi-static
active capability; integrated active and passive operations; improved Battle Group support; and improved information
processing. Functional improvements are delivered to the Fleet in software "Builds". Future builds will be based
upon the Advanced Processor Build (APB) process begun by the NAVSEA Submarine USW program. APB-99 was used to support
an ARCI(I) Engineering Development Model (EDM) demonstration system, providing A-180R long-line processing only. APB-
01 will be used for the production ARCI(I) systems for all long-line arrays. APB-02 will provide Twin-line processing
capabilities, and APB-03 will provide active processing capabilities. Additionally, each APB will introduce new
capabilities into SURTASS systems including improved automation, normalizer techniques, adaptive beamforming, and
display enhancements. SURTASS participates in the process by contributing algorithms for consideration, supplying
peer group members for review of candidate algorithms, participating in test evolutions, and incorporating improved
algorithms into operational systems. Project X0758 budget is being moved to Project X0766 beginning in FY03.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

• (2,000) TB-29A/Twin-Line – Continued hardware and software development and processing improvements to
support TB-29A operations and expand array interoperability.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-13 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

• (2,000) Passive Processing & Automation – Continued Computer Aided Detection, Classification, and
Tracking improvements, and development of automated tools to improve passive performance to support
tactical operations and reduce operator workload in high clutter environments.

• (1,843) Bi-Static and Shore Processing – Continued software development to improve Bi-Static
Processing in littoral/shallow water regions. Develop Link Management strategies for providing Bi-
Static data to shore to reduce requirements for deploying Military Detachments (MILDETS).

• (6,000) Onboard Signal Processor – Began integration of SURTASS shipboard processing (ARCI) into a
network-Centric architecture to extend SURTASS capabilities to other tactical platforms.

• (U) FY 2002 PLANS:

• (1,923) Passive Processing & Automation – Develop capability for monitoring low priority beams,
improved acoustic signature formation, and target passive ranging. Continue development of software
for processing off-board (autonomous) sensor data.

• (3,000) TB-29A/Twin-Line – Continue processing improvements to support TB-29A operations and expand
array interoperability. Develop across platform telemetry architecture. Investigate concepts for
conversion of TB-29A Twin-line capability into a Long-line capability.

• (1,807) Shore Processing – Continue incorporation of OMI Commonality Working group guidance. Continue
development of Link Management functionality. Develop shore-processing capability for TB-29A array
and off-board sensors.

• (1,800) SURTASS/LFA – Continue software development to improve processing in littoral/shallow water

regions.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY

FY 2001: Section 8086 .7% Pro-Rata Reduction (-$86K), Congressional Plus-Up ASW Combat Sys Int -
Onboard Signal Processor (+$6,000K), Government-Wide Rescission Issue 68869 (-$27K), Miscellaneous Navy
Adjustment (0), SBIR Assessment (-$155K), BTR CTO Synthetic Aperture Sonar (-$123K), Miscellaneous Navy
Adjustments (-$252K).

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-14 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

FY 2002: Congressional Plus-Up SURTASS/LFA (+$2,800K), Section 8123 Management Reform Initiative (-
$76K).

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL

ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM
OMN 1C3C 26,361 28,916
OPN 2237 5,457 17,494

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0204311N(Integrated Surveillance System)

(U) PE 0603785N(Combat Systems Oceanographic Performance Assessment)
(U) PE 0603747N(Undersea Warfare Advanced Technology)

D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY2001 FY2002
Program
Milestones

Engineering ARCI A-180R ARCI PBA/RDA

Milestones VARIANT 7/01 VARIANT 7/02

T&E SEA TEST SEA TEST

Milestones ARCI A180R ARCI PBA/RDA
VARIANT 9/01 VARIANT 9/02

Contract TB-29A/TL
Milestones Procurement

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-15 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1)

RDT&E/Budget Activity 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N SURTASS x0758

Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Cost Target

Method & Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award To Total Value of
Cost Categories Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Passive Signal
Processing/Sonar
Automation CPFF APL/DSR 22,952 2,000 Nov-00 1,900 Nov-01 26,852

Array Improvements CPFF/WR APL/SSC/Var 16,451 1,075 Nov-00 2,075 Nov-01 19,601

Processing
Improvements/Shore
Processing CPFF ARL/DSR/Var 24,588 1,433 Nov-00 1,374 Nov-01 27,395
Various Var/WX Various 15,103 0 Nov-00 0 N/A 15,103

Common Processor WX DSR 1,200 0 N/A 0 N/A 1,200

Onboard Signal
Processing Var/WX Various 0 5,675 May-01 5,675

SURTASS/LFA Var/WX Various 0 0 N/A 1,700 May-02 1,700

Subtotal Product
Development 80,294 10,183 7,049 97,526
Remarks:
APL = APL/JHU
RSC = Raytheon Systems Co.
SSC = SPAWAR Systems Center.
ARL = ARL/UT

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-16 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2)

RDT&E/Budget Activity 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N SURTASS x0758

Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Cost Target

Method & Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award To Total Value of
Cost Categories Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Passive/Array Nov-
Improvements Var/Wx Various 1,838 375 00 375 Nov-01 2,588
Onboard Signal May-
Processing Var/Wx Various 0 125 01 125
SURTASS/LFA
Processing Var/WX Various 0 0 N/A 100 May-02 100
Subtotal Support 1,838 500 475 2,813

Remarks

Passive/Array Nov-
improvements Var/WX MISC. 3,313 945 00 945 Nov-01 5,203
Onboard Signal May-
Processing Var/WX Various 0 100 01 100
Subtotal T&E 3,313 1,045 945 5,303
Remarks

Passive/Array Nov-
improvements Var/WX MISC. 522 15 00 61 Nov-01 598
Onboard Signal May-
Processing Var/WX Various 0 100 01 100
Subtotal
Management 522 115 61 698
Remarks

Total Cost 85,967 11,843 8,530 106,340

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-17 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, FY 2003 RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X0758

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: SURTASS

Remarks
Beginning in FY03, Project X0758 budget is being moved to Project X0766 line.

R-1 Shopping List-Item No.182-18 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, RDT&E,N Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X9102

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACUTALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X9102 IUSS

TOTAL 6,740 6,740

A. (U) IUSS provides the Navy with its primary means of submarine detection both nuclear and diesel. The program has
undergone a major transition from emphasis on maintaining a large dispersed surveillance force keyed to detection and
tracking of submarines to a much smaller force that is effective against modern diesel and nuclear submarines in
regional/littoral or broad ocean areas of interest. This transition preserves the ability to continue open ocean
surveillance. PD18 is involved with the development and upgrade of various IUSS systems. These systems include FDS,
FDS-C, SDS, SURTASS, and ADS.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 Accomplishments: N/A

2. (U) FY 2002 PLANS: (6,740) Funds first phase of the Automated IUSS Mission Planning System. This effort builds
on the work begun in the ADS program (PE 0604784N) to automate array laydown and cable routing plans and allows
the mission planner the capability to rapidly update the plan. Functional requirements for FSS, ADS and SURTASS
will be combined and prioritized with fleet input. Software will be developed as GCCS-M segments that are at
least level 6 DII-COE compliant. Included is approximately 800K to collect environmental and physical data for
an area of high fleet tactical interest for mission planner demonstration.

3. (U) FY 2003 PLANS: N/A

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 2002: Congressional Plus-Up FDS (+$6,800), Section 8123: Management Reform Initiative (-60K)

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-19 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X9102

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: IUSS

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0204311N(Integrated Surveillance System)
(U) PE 0604784N(Advanced Deployable System)

D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
Program
Milestones

Engineering PDR 6/02

Milestones DDR 9/02

T&E
Milestone

Contract
Milestones

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 182-20 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X9103

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: FDS

(U) COST (Dollars in thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACUTALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X9103 FDS

TOTAL 2,973 2,973

A. (U) IUSS provides the Navy with its primary means of submarine detection both nuclear and diesel. The program has
undergone a major transition from emphasis on maintaining a large dispersed surveillance force keyed to detection and
tracking of submarines to a much smaller force that is effective against modern diesel and nuclear submarines in
regional/littoral or broad ocean areas of interest. This transition preserves the ability to continue open ocean
surveillance. PD18 is involved with the development and upgrade of various IUSS systems. These systems include FDS,
FDS-C, SDS, SURTASS, and ADS.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 Accomplishments: N/A

2. (U) FY 2002 PLANS:

(2,973) Develop FSS system improvements to optimize performance. Development efforts include calibrated data
collection, increased frequency capability and the impact on signal processing and array designs and increased
bandwidth for signal processing. Continue development of an All-Optical underwater surveillance system.

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY 2002: Congressional Plus-Up FDS (+$3,000K), Section 8123: Management Reform Initiative (-27K)

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-21 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0204311N PROJECT NUMBER: X9103

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Integrated Surveillance System PROJECT TITLE: FDS

C. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in thousands)

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
ACTUALS ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

(U) RELATED RDT&E:

(U) PE 0204311N(Integrated Surveillance System)
(U) PE 0604784N(Advanced Deployable System)

D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
Program
Milestones

Engineering
Milestones

T&E
Milestone

Contract
Milestones

R-1 Shopping List-Item No. 182-22 of 182-22

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Support Unit/0204413N

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Total PE Cost 11.604 22.316 6.352 7.160 0.207 0.305 0.332 0.000 48.276

SACC AUTOMATION/21980 0.000 4.557 4.376 5.925 0.207 0.305 0.332 0.000 15.702

LCU REPLACEMENT AND DMFD/22231 2.801 5.766 1.976 1.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.778

AMPHIBIOUS LIGHTERAGE DEVELOP/Y2909 8.803 9.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.318
EXW TESTBED- SUPPORTING ARMS
TECH INSERTION/29105 2.478 2.478

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: This Program Element supports various amphibious development and technology insertion efforts.

B. Project efforts are as follows:

SACC AUTOMATION: The Supporting Arms Coordination Center (SACC) initiative is to automate the communications and data flow that calls for fire and supporting arms for
marine forces ashore.

LCU REPLACEMENT AND DMFD: This project supports development and procurement of a technologically advanced heavy lift utility landing craft to compliment the high
speed, over-the-beach, ship-to-shore amphibious lift of the future. D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo (DFMD) -procurement of the 15K Bladder System.

AMPHIBIOUS LIGHTERAGE DEVELOPMENT: This project supports development and procurement of technology to develop a service-interoperable causeway lighterage
system

EXW TESTBED: Expeditionary Warfare Testbed initiative is an effort utilizing a testbed to identify promising and emerging technologies which bring significant capability to
the Expeditionary Warfighter. Key technologies will be earmarked for use in the development of a Command Operation Center-Afloat (COC-Afloat).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 -1 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Support Unit/0204413N

B. Program Change Summary

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
(U) FY 2002 President’s Budget: 11.837 24.387 6.352
(U) Appropriated Value: 7.911 26.887
(U) Adjustment to FY 2001/2002 Appropriated Value/
FY 2002 Presidents Budget: -3.693 -4.571 _______
(U) FY 2003 PRES Budget Submit 11.604 22.316 6.352

- (U) Funding: FY01 Adjustments:

SBIR Assessment IAW 15 USC 638 -.167
Other Minor Adjustments -.139
Project Change (Y2909) 3.999

FY02 Adjustments:
Sec 8123 Management Reform -.199
Project Change (Y2909) -4.372

FY03 Adjustments:
Project Change (Y2909)
Other Minor Adjustments

- (U) Schedule: None

- (U) Technical: None

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 2 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N SACC Automation/21980

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 0.000 4.557 4.376 5.925 0.207 0.305 0.332 0.000 15.702

RDT&E Articles Qty

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The Supporting Arms Coordination Center (SACC) initiative is to automate the communications and data flow that calls for fire and supporting arms
for marine forces ashore. Currently the process is all manual and voice accomplished which, in the future, will be unresponsive to the needs of supported forces. Specifically, this project will develop the Naval
Fire Control System and procure two engineering development ship sets for installation. It will also provide interface with the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data Systems (AFATDS) which brings the
automated functions of supporting arms into the coherent tactical picture.

FY 2001 Accomplishments: Not Applicable

FY 2002 Plan:
- ($2.500) Engineering Development
- ($2.057) Risk Reduction Planning, Requirements Definition, Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), Performance Specifications Development, and Selection Criteria Establishment
FY2003: Plan:
- ($3.250) Demo Engineering Development Model
- ($1.126) Risk Reduction Analysis and Government Acceptance Test

B. Other Program Funding Summary

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 To Complete Total Cost
OPN Line 098100 Items Under $5M 0 343 344 870 866 871 866 Con't Con't
O&MN Line, 1D3D, PEO EXW, PE 0708012N 0 316 343 1804 1787 1423 1428 Con't Con't

The procurement items are for jam boxes, Automated Distribution Network Systems (ADNS), racks, workstations, and communications devices which will be permanent changeouts to the amphibious ships.
These need to be in place in order to permit the connection of the automated SACC capabilities. The operations and maintenance efforts are for program, engineering, and technical support, logistics support
and technical assists.

(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183- 3 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N SACC Automation/21980

C. Acquisition Strategy: This project is part of a collaboration between N85 and N86 to jointly develop and field a Naval Fire Control System (NFCS) that satisfies the requirements of naval and supported
forces. The NFCS is to be an ACAT III program under N86 management.

D. Schedule Profile:
FY 02 FY03 To Complete
Program Milestones - Begin SACC engineering development - Conduct Demo development model - Enter Production and Deployment Phase
- Address risk reduction planning and requirements - Continue and complete risk reduction
development analysis
- Conduct Analysis of Alternatives - Conduct Government acceptance testing
- Begin and complete Performance Specifications

Engineering Milestones
T&E Milestones - IOT&E (FY04)
Contract Milestones

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 4 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N SACC Automation/21980
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Engineering Development TBD TBD 2.500 12/01 2.500
Primary Hardware Development 1.692 1.692
Ancillary Hardware Development 0.000
Systems Engineering * * * 1.048 11/01 1.048
Licenses 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development 0.000 0.000 3.548 0.000 1.692 5.240

Remarks: Tasks include risk reduction planning, requirements development, conducting analysis of alternatives (AoA), and developing performance specifications.
Army - $0.200 (MIPR)
NSWC, DD - $0.400 (WR/PO) and CSS - $0.750 (WR/PO)
Norfolk Navy Shipyard - $0.300 (WR)

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development 1.800 1.800
Training Development 0.100 0.100
Integrated Logistics Support WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.050 11/01 0.050 0.100 0.200
Configuration Management 0.000
Technical Data WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.200 11/01 0.050 0.200 0.450
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.100 2.200 2.550

Remarks: Preparation of ship alterations and tech drawings and accompanied support

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 5 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N SACC Automation/21980
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation TBD TBD 3.250 11/02 0.700 3.950
Operational Test & Evaluation 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.250 0.700 3.950

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support 0.000

Government Engineering Support WR/PO NSWC,DD (CSS) 0.459 11/01 0.526 11/02 1.557 2.542
Program Management Support WR/PO NSWC,DD (CSS) 0.290 11/01 0.490 10/02 0.600 1.380
Travel 0.010 11/01 0.010 10/02 0.020 0.040
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.759 1.026 2.177 3.962

Remarks:

Total Cost 0.000 0.000 4.557 4.376 6.769 15.702

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 6 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N LCU Replacement and D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo,DMFD/22231

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 2.801 5.766 1.976 1.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 11.778

RDT&E Articles Qty

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: (LCU) - This project supports development and procurement of a technologically advanced heavy lift utility landing craft to compliment the high speed,
over-the-beach, ship-to-shore amphibious lift of the future. D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo (DFMD) - This effort, in FY04 only ($1M), funds procurement of the 15K Bladder System currently being demonstrated by
ONR/NFESC as an Advance Technology Demonstration (ATD). This will provide bulk fuel delivery capability by LCACs from distances exceeding hose capability.
FY 2001 Accomplishments (LCU and DFMD)
- ($0.389) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA).
- ($0.750) Commercial Designs (Concepts & Feasibility Designs).
- ($0.905) Government Studies & Technical support (e.g., Operational requirements, Hull forms, C4I, Navigation systems, Automation, Threat assessments).
- ($0.070) Shipboard interface & interoperability (Planning Yard support, TERP support).
- ($0.168) DoD 5000 Documentation & Program reviews (e.g., Acq. Strat, Requirements, ILS)
- ($0.170) Contracting & Evaluation support (e.g., BAA, SOW, TERP support)
- ($0.321) Programmatic Support (e.g., ABS, Mgnt plan, Schedules, briefs, Web site, travel, studies)
- ($0.028) Emergent requirements.
FY 2002 Plan (LCU and DFMD)
- ($0.210) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA)
- ($1.500) Commercial designs (Feasibility & Detail designs)
- ($0.762) Conduct enabling technologies R&D.
- ($0.750) Model testing & Simulations (e.g., beaching, seakeeping, survivability).
- ($1.185) Government Studies & Technical Support (e.g., Feasibility Studies, ORD Development, Threat analysis, C4I, ILS, & TERP support)
- ($0.490) Shipboard interface & interoperability (e.g., Planning Yard support, C4I/SPAWAR, Survivability Studies, Systems integration, TERP support)
- ($0.284) DoD 5000 Documentation & Program reviews (e.g., AS, ORD, APB, TEMP, ILSP)
- ($0.214) Contracting & Evaluation support (e.g., BAA, SOW, TERP support)
- ($0.371) Programmatic Support (e.g., ABS, Mgnt plan, Schedules, briefs, Web site, travel, studies)
FY 2003 Plan (LCU and DFMD)
- ($0.150) Complete commercial design studies
- ($0.575) Government Studies & Technical support (e.g., Performance Specification, Producibility Studies, RFP/SOW
- ($0.300) Shipboard interface and interoperability (e.g., C4I, Survivability, Systems integration, RFP/SOW)
- ($0.460) DoD 5000 Milestone Documentation & Program Reviews (e.g., APB,ORD, TEMP, Risk, Env/Saf/Hlth, ILA)
- ($0.121) Contracting & Evaluation support (e.g., Perf Specs, DRLs, RFP/SOW)
- ($0.370) Programmatic Support (e.g., ABS, Mgnt plan, Schedules, briefs, Web site, travel, studies)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 7 of 183 - 18 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N LCU Replacement and D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo,DMFD/22231

B. Other Program Funding Summary (LCU and DFMD)

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete Total Cost
SCN Line 510000 Service Craft 0 0 0 0 59.007 60.076 61.299 Cont. Cont.
OPN/603300/CL-25(NAVFAC)/0204413N 3.997 3.999 4.001
(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

C. Acquisition Strategy (LCU): Feasibility studies will be conducted to determine the best design to meet new Navy requirements for heavy lift utility landing craft and to support a performance specification that
will be competitively awarded.

D. Schedule Profile (LCU):

FY02 FY03 To Complete
Program Milestones - Decision Review Milestone documentation - Decision Review (MS I) - Evaluation of feasibility of alternatives
- RFP Preparation - Enabling technology studies
- Source Selection plan

Engineering Milestones - Execute design studies - Performance Specification

- Milestone B documentation
T&E Milestones - Begin and complete model testing

Contract Milestones - Completion of Analysis of Alternatives

- Exercise Options for commercial specs

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 8 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N LCU Replacement and D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo(DMFD)/22231
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development
Ancillary Hardware Development
Systems Engineering WR NSWC Bethesda, Md 0.200 0.200
Licenses 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.200 0.200

Remarks:

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development 0.000
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.050 0.050
Configuration Management 0.000
Technical Data 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.050

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 9 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N LCU Replacement and D-Day Mobile Fuel Demo(DMFD)/22231
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation WR NSWC Bethesda, Md 1.872 12/01 0.644 12/02 2.516
Operational Test & Evaluation 0.050 0.050
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 1.872 0.644 0.050 2.566

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support 0.000

Government Engineering Support WR NSWC Bethesda, Md 2.181 11/00 3.099 11/01 1.032 11/02 0.465 6.777
Program Management Support CPFF various 0.600 11/00 0.745 11/01 0.250 11/02 0.420 2.015
Travel 0.020 10/00 0.050 10/01 0.050 10/02 0.050 0.170
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 0.000 2.801 3.894 1.332 0.935 8.962

Remarks:

Total Cost 0.000 2.801 5.766 1.976 1.235 11.778

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 10 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N Amphibious Lighterage Development/Y2909

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 8.803 9.515 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 18.318

RDT&E Articles Qty

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: Joint Modular Lighterage System (JMLS Development) - This project supports development and procurement of technology to develop
a service-interoperable causeway lighterage system with the US Army, capable of assembly and operation (in a loaded condition) through Sea State 3. Sea State 3 is defined as significant
wave height of 3.5 feet to 5.0 feet per the Joint Logistics Over The Shore (JLOTS) Mission Need Statement. Due to US Army withdrawal from the JMLS program in FY01 and lack of funding
support. Resource sponsor has decided to terminate the JMLS program after FY2002. The current project includes resolution of technical issues identified during Technical Evaluation and
completion of all current design and development requirements for a program closeout.

FY2001 Accomplishments (JMLS Development):

- ($0.839) Complete Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration. Conduct Mulitary Utility Assessment (MUA).
- ($1.199) Engineering studies, engineering support to resolve technical issues.
- ($0.100) Program documentation including ORD and TEMP.
- ($1.998) Resolve Technical and Design issues identified during ACTD. Efforts include engineering tests.
- ($0.350) Throughput and ship interface studies.
- ($0.959) Specification development and contract support.
- ($3.358) Proof of Concept contract for design, manufacture, and test of 24' wide module.
FY 2002 Plan (JMLS Development):
- ($.500) Engineering studies, engineering support to resolve technical issues.
- ($0.050) Program documentation including ORD and TEMP.
- ($0.641) Resolve Technical and Design issues identified during ACTD.
- ($0.225) Throughput and ship interface studies.
- ($8.099) Proof of Concept contract for design, manufacture, and test of 24' wide module.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 11 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N Amphibious Lighterage Development/Y2909

B. Other Program Funding Summary (JMLS Development)

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 To Complete Total Cost
CESE Line 6033 Amphib Equip (OPN)(Reqmt) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
(U) Related RDT&E: n/a

C. Acquisition Strategy (JMLS): The T&E efforts for the JMLS ACTD was completed in FY01. Due to lack of funding during PR03, resource sponsor zero'd all procurement funds for
JMLS program, resulting in termination of JMLS program after FY02. In FY02 JMLS will complete all existing design and development effort, including incorporation of connector technology
developed during the ACTD into a wider 24' module and a Proof of Concept contract to design, manufacture, and test a new 24' wide module.

D. Schedule Proflie: FY02 FY03 To Complete

Program Milestones - Mfg module prototype (24' module)
- Test module prototype (24' module)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 12 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N Amphibious Lighterage Development/Y2909
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development SS/CPFF ONR, NSCWCD 3.189 12/00 5.400 11/01 0.000 8.589
Ancillary Hardware Development SS/CPFF NSWC, NFESC 0.250 12/00 0.450 11/01 0.000 0.700
Systems Engineering PO/WR NSWC,CD, NFESC 2.318 10/00 0.700 11/01 0.000 3.018
Licenses 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development 0.000 5.757 6.550 0.000 0.000 12.307

Remarks:

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development 0.000
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.000 0.000
Configuration Management 0.000
Technical Data 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 13 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N Amphibious Lighterage Development/Y2909
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation PO/WR NSWC,CD, NFESC 0.839 10/00 0.501 01/02 0.000 1.340
Operational Test & Evaluation PO/WR NSWC,CD, NFESC 1.263 01/02 0.000 1.263
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.839 1.764 0.000 0.000 2.603

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support SS/CPFF TBD 1.098 10/00 0.450 11/01 1.548
Government Engineering Support WR NSWC Bethesda, Md 1.009 01/01 0.641 11/01 1.650
Program Management Support PO/WR NSWC,CD, NFESC 0.100 0.110 11/01 0.210
Travel PO/WR 0.000 0.000 0.000
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 0.000 2.207 1.201 0.000 0.000 3.408

Remarks:

Total Cost 0.000 8.803 9.515 0.000 0.000 18.318

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 14 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N EXW Testbed- Supporting Arms Tech Insertion/21980

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 0.000 2.478 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.478

RDT&E Articles Qty

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The Expeditionary Warfare Testbed initiative is an effort utilizing a testbed to identify promising and emerging technologies which bring significant capability
to the Expeditionary Warfighter. Key technologies will be earmarked for use in the development of a Command Operation Center-Afloat (COC-Afloat). The COC Afloat will be designed to support warfighting
concepts such as Operational Maneuver from the Sea and Ship to Objective Maneuver, both critical to the revised USMC Expeditionary Warfare Concept. Joint Forces will be used to test the equipment via
major exercises, obtaining critical operator input for an Operation Requirements Document revalidation effort.

FY 2001 Accomplishments: Not Applicable

FY 2002 Plan:
- ($1.765) Engineering Development of Prototype Command Operation Center-Afloat. This will include testing Prototype during major Joint Exercises.
- ($0.713) Preliminary , Requirements Definition, Draft Command Operation Center-Afloat ORD and Initial Configuration Management Plans developed.
FY2003: Plan: Not Applicable

B. Other Program Funding Summary

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 To Complete Total Cost

OPN Line 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O&MN Line 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 15 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NAME AND NUMBER PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N/BA7 Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N EXW Testbed- Supporting Arms Tech Insertion/21980

C. Acquisition Strategy: This project continues with the development of the N75 sponsored Expeditionary Warfare Testbed in order to identify for acquisition a highly functional and capable Command
Operations Center for Expeditionary Warfare Ships. It is also an adjunct and continuation of the effort to automate the Supporting Arms Coordination Center aboard Amphibious ships and supplements the
next phase of that acquisitions strategy.

D. Schedule Profile:
FY 02 FY03 To Complete
Program Milestones - Begin COC-Afloat engineering development
- Participate in two Major Joint Exercise to obtain
critical operator input
- Revalidate ORD
- Start Configuration Requirements

Engineering Milestones - Identify and obtain equipment

T&E Milestones
Contract Milestones

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 16 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N EXW Testbed- Supporting Arms Tech Insertion/21980
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Engineering Development WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.990 02/02 0.990
Primary Hardware Development 0.000
Ancillary Hardware Development 0.000
Systems Engineering WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.060 02/02 0.060
Licenses 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development 0.000 0.000 1.050 0.000 0.000 1.050

Remarks: Due to the location of the Expeditionary Warfare Testbed in Panama City, NSWC, DD (CSS) will be conducting a majority of the engineering effort in conjunction with the National Technical Alliance. Support from
NSWC, DD (DL and DN) will be used for the experimentation portion and ORD development.

Development Support Equipment TBD National Technical Alliance 0.300 02/02 0.300
Software Development 0.000
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.000
Configuration Management WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.110 02/02 0.110
Technical Data WR/PO NSWC, DD (CSS) 0.040 02/02 0.040
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support 0.000 0.000 0.450 0.000 0.000 0.450

Remarks: The National Technical Alliance was identified as a participant in the FY02 effort.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 17 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E,N Amphibious Tactical Spt Unit/0204413N EXW Testbed- Supporting Arms Tech Insertion/21980
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation TBD TBD 0.175 02/02 0.175
Operational Test & Evaluation 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 0.000 0.000 0.175 0.000 0.000 0.175

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support TBD TBD 0.385 02/02 0.385

Government Engineering Support WR/PO NSWC,DD 0.060 02/02 0.060
Program Management Support WR/PO NSWC,DD (CSS) 0.233 02/02 0.233
Travel TBD NSWC, DD and Contractors 0.125 0.125
Labor (Research Personnel) WR/PO NSWC,DD (CSS) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 0.000 0.000 0.803 0.000 0.000 0.803

Remarks:

Total Cost 0.000 0.000 2.478 0.000 0.000 2.478

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 183 - 18 of 183 - 18

UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 280.823 30.146 25.233 31.421 36.718 30.396 23.573 24.753 Continuing Continuing
21427/22449** **
Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT) 69.696 11.357 5.595 15.340 20.841 18.822 12.613 13.689 Continuing Continuing
22449
Shipboard Electronic Attack Training (SEAT) 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.991
S9106
Tactical Communications On-Board Trainer 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.991
S9107
Link On-Board Trainer 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.991
W0431 *
Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS) 53.659 1.474 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 55.133
W0604
Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRIDS) 1.521 3.570 3.141 2.936 2.524 2.611 2.705 Continuing Continuing
W1998
Joint Tactical Combat Training System (JTCTS) 148.833 2.757 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 151.590
W2124
Air Warfare Training Development (AWTD) 2.006 1.887 2.115 2.163 1.832 1.887 1.907 Continuing Continuing
X1823
Training and Modeling Systems (TMS) 8.635 11.031 11.208 10.825 10.778 7.218 6.462 6.452 Continuing Continuing

Quantity of RDT&E Articles Not applicable

* This amount includes FY90- FY99.

**This amount includes a FY01 Congressional Add in FY 01 under PU 22449 for BFTT Windows NT

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The STTT will develop the Battle Force Tactical Training (BFTT) System to provide realistic Combat System team training including a means to link surface ships together for coordinated unit and Battle Group level training
using Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) and High Level Architecture (HLA) protocols. The migration of BFTT software to Windows NT from UNIX OS is underway. BFTT developed the BFTT Electronic Warfare
Trainer (BEWT) and applicable BFTT System software to provide EW operator and team training for Fleet EW Systems. The Congrressional adds initiate the development of the Electronic Attack training capability for
BEWT and develops the Tactrical Communication software interfaces and the BFTT Link Stimulation control software.

TACTS provides real-time monitoring and post-exercise debrief of aircrews flying on instrumented training ranges. This system is the primary training tool used by the Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center and the Marine
Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron.

The TRID program provides development of many range systems including range electronic warfare simulator, advanced weapons training systems, laser training systems, Large Area Tracking Range (LATR), combat
training system improvements and shallow water range technology.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development

JTCTS is planned to provide U.S. Navy fleet deployable instrumentation for at sea surface, subsurface, air training and tactics development, and fixed/transportable air range instrumentation for U.S. Navy
and U.S. Air Force air training and tactics development. JTCTS incorporates the Defense Modeling and Simulation Office sponsored Distributed Interactive Simulation Protocol Data Unit for interoperability
with Navy and other service live, virtual (simulators), and constructive (war games) simulations. JTCTS will initially deliver prototype hardware/software for a mobile/rangeless capability for a Carrier Air Wing
5 (CAG-5) after undergoing development/operational testing. It will further develop, test, and field fixed air range and fixed fleet range hardware/software in subsequent phases of the program. This
summary reflects only the USN funding component of the JTCTS.

The AWTD program provides development of many aviation training systems including mission rehearsal simulation technologies, and the Aviation Training Technology Integration Facility (ATTIF).

The TMS encompasses the requirements analysis and software development associated with the Navy’s Maritime Development Agent function as part of the Joint Simulation System (JSIMS). The BFTT will
develop the BFTT Electronic Warfare Trainer (BEWT) and applicable BFTT system software to provide EW operator and team training for Fleet EW Systems.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for
upgrade of existing, operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME 21429 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)/
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 22449 SEAT/S9106 Tactical Comms OBT/S9107 LINK OBT
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program
** ** ***
Project Cost N/A 10.553 11.357 8.568 15.340 20.841 18.822 12.613 13.689 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

**Includes Congressional Plus up funding for BFTT Windows NT.

***Includes Congressional Plus up funding for: 22449 SEAT; S9106 Tactical COMMS OBT; and S9107 LINK OBT.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The Battle Force Tactical Training (BFTT) Program provides realistic joint warfare training across the spectrum of armed conflict; realistic unit level team training in all warfare areas; a means to link ships together
which are in different homeports for coordinated training; external stimulation of shipboard training systems; and simulation of non-shipboard forces. BFTT uses a distributed architecture, integrating existing training
systems, and uses Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS) protocols, with planned migration to High Level Architecture (HLA). BFTT provides ships' Commanding Officers and Battle Group/Battle Force Commanders with
the ability to conduct coordinated realistic, high stress, combat system team training as an integral part of the Afloat Training Organization. BFTT provides a baseline capability/system that meets the Operational
Requirements Document (ORD). Stimulator/Simulators (STIM/SIM) provides standardized Radio Frequency (RF), Intermediate Frequency (IF), and/or Digital injection into surface ship radars and fire control systems for
training of shipboard operators/teams as part of the BFTT System. The BFTT Electronic Warfare Trainer (BEWT) effort provides embedded operator and team electronic emissions recognition training capability, integrated
into BFTT. BFTT software is being migrated from UNIX/TAC to a Windows-NT/PC Operating System (OS). The Shipboard Electronic Attack Training (SEAT) effort initiates development of the active electronic
countermeasures training capability to BEWT. The Tactical Communications On-Board Trainer effort modifies the tactical Link communications software to accept training data inputs. The Link On-Board Trainer effort
modifies the BFTT operating software to provide control of the Link 4/10/16 Stimulator.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 PLANS:

- (U) ($2.584) BFTT - Continue development of Link software, developing/integrating new software capabilities and automating debrief products.
- (U) ($1.540) HLA - Continue conversion of the DIS protocol based software to the HLA mandated architecture for the Entity Motioning and Modeling portion of the BFTT software in
accordance with DoD directives.
-(U) ($7.233) BFTT Windows NT - Complete migration of BFTT software elements to Windows-NT for UNIX Operating System (OS).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME 21429 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)/
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 22449 SEAT/S9106 Tactical Comms OBT/S9107 LINK OBT

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS: CONTINUATION SHEET

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($3.869) BFTT - Completing development of data Link simulation software, develop/integrate new s/w capabilities and system interfaces, develop BG level Display and Debrief software.

- (U) ($1.674) HLA - Complete conversion of the BFTT software to the existing HLA Standards.

- (U) ($.052) MMTT - Software development for the Multi-Mission Team Trainer (MMTT).

- (U) ($.991) SEAT - Initiate development of the Shipboard Electronic Attack Training (SEAT) software for BEWT.

- (U) ($.991) Tactical Communications On-Board Trainer - Software development for tactical communications system to accept training inputs.

- (U) ($.991) Link On-Board Trainer - Software development for BFTT software control of Link Stimulator.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($15.288) BFTT - Develop/integrate new software capabilities and system interfaces. Initiate development of Battle Group level Display and Debrief software. System/Communication
Engineering & Management to include the following: TACDEW Replacement (SG&C/JSAF); Consistent Readiness Status Display; Slave Multiple Special Points; Automate Displays;
Script Fly-to Points/Slaved & Auto Maneuvers; Integrate CMTpc; Add Air Corridors to BOPC; Add Airways to BOPC; Default Emitters ON; Inactive Entities for Rapid Entity Initiation;
Provide SIPRNET Access for Scenario & Dbase Xfer; Pause DCM without Closing D/C File; Allow Effects of IREPS Data to be applied by TSSS; and Allow Effects of IREPS Data
to be applied by BEWT.

- (U) ($.052) MMTT - Software development for the Multi-Mission Team Trainer (MMTT).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME 21429 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)/
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 22449 SEAT/S9106 Tactical Comms OBT/S9107 LINK OBT

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY: (Show total funding, schedule, and technical changes for the program element that have occurred since the last President's submission.

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 11.450 5.593 5.625
(U) Appropriated Value: 11.784 8.593 0
(U) Adjustments to FY 2001/2002 Appropriated Value/
FY 2002 President's Budget: -0.427 -0.025 9.715
(U) FY 2003 Pres Budget Submit: 11.357 8.568 15.340

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The net decrease of (-$.427M) in FY 2001 consists of minor pricing adjustments. FY 2002: The net decrease of (-$.025M )consists of minor pricing adjustments; a Congressional plus-
up under PU 22449 for Shipboard Electronic Attack Training (SEAT), Issue 67261, in the amount of +$1.0M; a Congressional plus-up under PU S9106, under Issue 67262, for the Tactical Communications
On-Board Trainer in the amount of +$1.0M; and a Congressional plus up under PU S9107 for the Link On-Board Trainer in the amount of +$1.0M. The net increase of $9.715M in FY 2003 consists of the
following: Issue 59085 for a BFTT Plus up in the amount of $4.380M; Issue 65365 for MMTT Plus up in the amount of $5.608M; and minor pricing adjustments of (-$.273M)

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

OPN 276200 24.318 40.145 9.554 10.447 23.711 22.795 9.336 CONT.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 21427 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: * The BFTT Program is designated as an ACAT IV-M Program consisting of four (4) phases - Concept Exploration and Definition, Demonstration and Validation,
Engineering and Manufacturing Development, and Production and Deployment.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

BFTT SCHEDULE
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
ORD APPROVED
MILESTONE 0/I

DT-IA COMPLETION
MILESTONE II

ORD RE-VALIDATION

DT-IIA COMPLETION

DT-IIB COMPLETION
MILESTONE III

IOC

DT-III

HLA CONVERSION

FOC

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME 21429 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)/
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 22449 SEAT/S9106 Tactical Comms OBT/S9107 LINK OBT
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development * AAI/MD & EWA/WV 11.514 0.000 11.514 11.514
Ancillary Hardware Development WR PHD/NSWC 1.000 0.000 1.000 1.000
Systems Engineering ** PHD NSWC/NUWC/GSA 17.696 0.700 01/01 1.182 01/02 2.780 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
Licenses WR/RCP PHD NSWC 2.037 0.035 01/01 0.100 01/02 0.278 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
Tooling 0.000
GFE 2.500 0.000 2.500 2.500
Award Fees 0.357 0.000 0.357 0.357
Subtotal Product Development 35.104 0.735 1.282 3.058 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:
* AAI Contract Award 3/98 CPIF; EWA Contract Award 6/98 CPFF
**WR/RCP/MIPR

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development * PHDNSWC/NAWCTSD/GSA/SPAWAR/CDSA
26.210 10.187 01/01 5.661 01/02 7.764 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.000
Configuration Management 0.000
Technical Data * PHDNSWC/NAWCTSD/GSA 7.709 0.385 01/01 0.725 01/02 2.016 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support 33.919 10.572 6.386 9.780 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

*WR/RCP/MIPR

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME 21429 Surface Tactical Team Trainer (STTT)/
RDT&E, N / BA-7 Program Element (PE) No. and Name 0204571N CTSD 22449 SEAT/S9106 Tactical Comms OBT/S9107 LINK OBT
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation * NSWC Crane/PHD/NAWC 3.257 0.050 01/01 0.400 01/02 1.112 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
Operational Test & Evaluation 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E 3.257 0.050 0.400 1.112 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

*WR/RCP/MIPR
**NSWC PHD/Crane/NAWC TSD/GSA

Contractor Engineering Support 0.000

Government Engineering Support * NSWC PHD/GSA 2.183 0.500 01/02 1.390 01/03 Continuing Continuing N/A
Program Management Support 0.000
Travel 0.000
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000
Subtotal Management 2.183 0.000 0.500 1.390 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

*WR/RCP/MIPR

Total Cost 74.463 11.357 8.568 15.340 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0431 Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 53.659 1.474 55.133

RDT&E Articles Qty

Project Units W0431, W0604, W1998, and W2124 do not match the budgets controls in FY 2001 due to the FY 2001 $8.8 million Congressional Recission in the FY 2002 Defense Appropriation Act. The FY 2001
amounts reflected actual obligations and projected expenditures for these programs.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project develops new TACTS capabilities primarily through the integration of additional types of aircraft and weapons. This requires
development of new aircraft interfaces, weapons and countermeasures simulations, and modifications to displays. Software is also developed to produce computer generated Electronic Warfare (EW) threats to enhance
the system's ability to provide training in a realistic EW environment. Various other system performance improvements are also developed to make the system more effective and reliable.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 8.635

- (U) ($.536) Weapons Integration - Completed development and integration of block 5.2 CCS software.

- (U) ($.718) Systems Upgrades – Commenced and completed development and integration of AIS A10 software.

- (U) ($.220) Studies/Analysis/T&E – Completed testing and acceptance of block 5.2 CCS software. Commenced and completed testing and acceptance of AIS A10 software.

2. FY 2002 PLANS: Not Applicable

3. FY 2003 PLANS: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0431 Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY2002 President's Budget: 1.569
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -0.095
(U) FY2003 President's Budget Submit: 1.474

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY2001 net decrease of $.095 million reflects a $.058 million decrease for a reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a $.037 million decrease for a Small Business
Innovative Research Assessment.

8.635
(U) Schedule: Not Applicable

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0431 Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The TACTS program is a non-ACAT program. The integrated program teams that develop new TACTS capabilities include contractors whose products and services are
obtained by means of competitive award, indefinite deliveries/indefinite quantity, and cost-type contracts. Individual delivery orders are awarded for specific development efforts.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones 2Q01/4Q01 A10 DT II

1Q01/4Q01 Blk 5.2 DTII

(U) Contract Milestones

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0431 Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Systems/Software Development Various Various 34.982 1.130 1Q/01 36.112

Subtotal Product Development 34.982 1.130 36.112

Remarks:

8.635

Software Development (Misc. <$1M) Various Various 3.695 0.104 1Q/01 3.799

Subtotal Support 3.695 0.104 3.799

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0431 Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation Various Various 14.982 0.220 1Q/01 15.202
(Misc. <$1M)

Subtotal T&E 14.982 0.220 15.202

Remarks:

Travel 0.020 1Q/01 0.020

Subtotal Management 0.020 0.020

Remarks:

Total Cost 53.659 1.474 55.133

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 1.521 3.570 3.141 2.936 2.524 2.611 2.705 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

Project Units W0431, W0604, W1998, and W2124 do not match the budgets controls in FY 2001 due to the FY 2001 $8.8 million Congressional Recission in the FY 2002 Defense Appropriation Act. The FY
2001 amounts reflected actual obligations and projected expenditures for these programs.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project develops specialized instrumentation systems for fleet readiness training while minimizing life cycle costs. Tasks include
development of the following: electronic warfare simulators and associated subsystems, target control systems, Large Area Tracking Range (LATR) improvements, combat training systems improvements, underwater
technology, ranges interoperability and information architecture, shallow water range activity which includes establishment of capability at Pacific Missile Range Facility Shallow Water Training Range (PMRF SWTR) and
assorted Advanced Weapons Training Systems (AWTS), such as Imaging Weapons Training System (IWTS), Remote Strafe Scoring System (RSSS), and weapon and countermeasure simulations for use with various
range training systems.

8.635
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($.598) Completed integration of LATR Block 3.0 software upgrade. Commenced development of Block 4.0 software upgrade. Continued aircraft integration requirements analyses, prototype
development and testing, and developing LATR system hardware upgrades.

- (U) ($.105) Developed and integrated platform interface improvements for combat training systems.

- (U) ($.310) Developed and integrated display system improvements for combat training systems.

- (U) ($.336) Developed and integrated new weapons training capabilities for combat training systems.

- (U) ($.172) Studied platform interfaces and methods for joint use of frequencies.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

-(U) ($.890) Continue development of Block 4.0 software upgrade, analysis of range integration requirements, and development of hardware upgrades for the LATR system. Redesign,
integrate and test modules to eliminate obsolete components with completion of the LATR power conditioner.

- (U) ($1.182) Develop additional training capabilities for the Control and Computational Subsystem (CCS).

- (U) ($.637) Develop additional training capabilities for the Personal Computer Advanced Display and Debriefing Subsystem (PCADDS).

- (U) ($.510) Develop a formalized interface between the CCS and the LATR.

- (U) ($.243) Analyze existing range instrumentation to determine where technology upgrades are needed to ensure that training ranges are able to support readiness objectives.

- (U) ($.108) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15USC 638.
8.635
3. FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($.865) Complete operational test and evaluation, and integration of Block 4.0 software upgrade for LATR system. Continue development, test and integration of hardware and software
upgrades. Continue redesign, integrate and test modules to eliminate obsolete components with completion of the design integration and test of the Advance Digital Interface Unit and GPS receiver. Perform
security analysis of upgraded LATR ground system for system certification and accreditation.

- (U) ($1.096) Continue development of additional training capabilities for the Control and Computational Subsystem (CCS). Complete CCS Block 6.0 upgrade.

- (U) ($.580) Complete development of an interface between the CCS and the LATR.

- (U) ($.600) Continue analysis of existing range instrumentation to determine where technology upgrades are needed to ensure that training ranges are able to support readiness objectives.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 15 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)
(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
FY2001 FY2002 FY2003
(U) FY2002 President's Budget: 1.741 3.600
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -0.220 -0.030
(U) FY2003 President's Budget Submit: 1.521 3.570 3.141
CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net decrease of $.220 million reflects a $.185 million decrease for a reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a $.035 million decrease for a Small Business
Innovative Research Assessment. The FY 2002 net decrease of $.030 million reflects a $.032 million decrease for an undistributed congressional reduction offset by a $.002 million increase in minor
price adjustments.

(U) Schedule: The following milestones have been added, changed or deleted due to better reflect program status:

ADDED:
CCS Blk 5.3 Upgrade IOC 4Q/02 LATR Recert./Acc. IOC 4Q/04 CCS Blk 6.0 Upgrade IOC 4Q/03
8.635
PCADDS IOC 4Q/02 LATR Multi-GIS OT&E 2Q/02 LATR ADIU OT&E 4Q/03 CCS/LATR Interface IOC 4Q/03
LATR GPS Receiver OT&E 4Q/02 CCS/LATR HLA IOC 4Q/03 LATR Power Coniditioner OT&E 3Q/02

CHANGED:
From: To:
Block 4.0 LATR 2Q/03 Block 4.0 LATR 4Q/03
LATR Multi-GIS OT&E 2Q/02 LATR Multi-GIS OT&E 3Q/02
LATR GPS Receiver OT&E 4Q/02 LATR GPS Receiver OT&E 2Q/03

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete
Related OPN: 1.040 1.650 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cont.
Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 16 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The TRID program is a non-ACAT program. The integrated program teams that develop new TRID capabilities include contractors whose products and services are obtained
by means of competitive award, indefinite deliveries/indefinite quantity (IDIQ), and cost-type contracts. Individual delivery orders are awarded for specific development efforts.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones 1Q/01 Block3.0 LATR 4Q/02 CCS Block 5.3 4Q/03 Block 4.0 LATR 4Q/04 LATR Recert./Acc IOC
Upgrade IOC Upgrade IOC Upgrade IOC

4Q/02 PCADDS IOC 4Q/03 CCS/LATR Interface IOC

4Q/03 CCS Block 6.0 IOC

(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones 3Q/02 LATR Multi-GIS OT&E 1Q/03 Block 4.0 LATR
Upgrade DT III
3Q/02 LATR Power Conditioner OT&E
4Q/03 LATR Advanced Digital
Interface Unit (ADIU) OT&E

2Q/03 LATR GPS Recv. OT&E

(U) Contract Milestones

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 17 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Systems Engineering and Software Various Various 79.890 1.186 1Q/01 2.224 1Q/02 2.003 1Q/03 Continuing Continuing
Development (Misc. < $1M)

Subtotal Product Development 79.890 1.186 2.224 2.003 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

8.635

Development Support (Misc. <$1M) Various Various 5.898 0.302 1Q/01 0.585 1Q/02 0.425 1Q/03 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Support 5.898 0.302 0.585 0.425 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 18 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N Consolidated Training Systems Development W0604 Training Range and Instrumentation Development (TRID)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation Various Various 3.638 0.606 1Q/02 0.589 1Q/03 Continuing Continuing
(Misc. <$1M)

Subtotal T&E 3.638 0.606 0.589 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Mangement Support WX NAWCAD Patuxent River 1.641 0.033 1Q/01 0.047 1Q/02 0.124 1Q/03 Continuing Continuing
SBIR Assessment 0.108 0.108

Subtotal Management 1.641 0.033 0.155 0.124 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 91.067 1.521 3.570 3.141 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 19 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2.006 1.887 2.115 2.163 1.832 1.856 1.887 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty Not applicable

Project Units W0431, W0604, W1998, and W2124 do not match the budgets controls in FY 2001 due to the FY 2001 $8.8 million Congressional Recission in the FY 2002 Defense Appropriation Act. The FY
2001 amounts reflected actual obligations and projected expenditures for these programs.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

This project develops new training system technologies for use in naval aviation. Products from this effort directly support the Marine Corps Aviation Simulation Master Plan, and will support the development and design of
future naval aviation training/mission rehearsal systems. Tasks include: 1) Advanced training systems development to provide for transportable, modular, High Level Architecture (HLA) compliant, high fidelity mission
rehearsal capabilities. Mission rehearsal is defined as the practice of planned tasks and functions critical to mission success using a true-to-life, interactive representation of the expected operating environment.
Technologies to be developed and integrated include: helmet mounted and/or flat panel displays, photographic quality image generation, advanced environmental effects models, radar/infra-red/electro-optic and acoustic
sensor simulations; and 2) the Aviation Training Technology Integration Facility (ATTIF), which is a man-in-the-loop testbed for the integration of software, hardware, and networked systems. ATTIF will include a HLA node
for participation in fleet exercise synthetic battlespace. This ATTIF capability provides a window to fleet aviators for critical comment, evaluation, and fine tuning of new and innovative training technology before it is fielded.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($.480) Demonstrated forward looking infrared (FLIR) sensor, water NVD effects, and integration of night vision training system (NVTS) with a PC IG.
- (U) ($.180) Continued to analyze and integrate performance specifications for modular weapons systems/deployable simulator systems.
- (U) ($.812) Analyzed, developed, integrated (ATTIF) modular architecture components for threat generation, instructor operating station (IOS), visuals, E-2C station, and intelligent synthetic forces.
- (U) ($.534) Integrated (ATTIF) and demonstrated low-cost/PC-based technologies.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($.610) Analyze, develop, and integrate (ATTIF) modular architecture components for intelligent wingman, E-2C avionics, intelligent agents, F/A-18 OFP and weapon systems.
- (U) ($.430) Integrate FLIR sensor simulation with sensor host.
- (U) ($.127) Demonstrate (ATTIF) low-cost training and Mission rehearsal configurations, while maintaining or increasing fidelity.
- (U) ($.385) Develop applications for texture storage and PC based visual system technologies.
- (U) ($.278) Upgrade common IOS to the Joint Mission Planning System (JMPS) version.
- (U) ($.057) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 20 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

4. FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($.146) Demonstrate (ATTIF) low-cost training and mission rehearsal configurations and evaluate medium fidelity cockpits.
- (U) ($.680) Analyze, develop, and integrate (ATTIF) modular architecture components for F/A-18 cockpit avionics, intelligent wingman, E-2C platform, and intelligent synthetic forces.
- (U) ($.481) Demonstrate ability to input variables that affect FLIR imagery, analyze mission rehearsal database interoperability, and tool requirements.
- (U) ($.808) Develop applications for real-time shadows on PC video cards and a software only visual application, that requires no graphics hardware acceleration to implement simulation features.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 21 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY 2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 2.134 1.904
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: -0.128 -0.017
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 2.006 1.887 2.115

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 2001 adjustment of -$.128 reflects a decrease of -$.094 for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy and a decrease of -$.034 million for a Small Business Innovative
Research Assessment (SBIR).
(U) Funding: FY 2002 adjustment of -$.017 reflects a decrese for an undistributed congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

APN Line 51 BA-7 (47C2) Common Ground 24.778 0 20.496 0 0 0 0 0

Equipment (USMC Aviation Simulation
Master Plan)

Related RDT&E
(U) P.E. 0603707N, Project #R1773, Sub-Project Title: Transportable Strike Assault Rehearsal System (T-STARS)
(U)P.E. 0604245N, Project #H2279, Sub-Project Title: USMC H-1 Upgrades

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 22 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

(U) Engineering Milestones Modular architecture for common Modular architecture for Modular architecture for
IOS, E-2C station, visuals (4Q) avionics, intelligent forces cockpit avionics. (4Q)
Modular architecture = reconfigurable (4Q)

(U) T&E Milestones Modular architecture Modular architecture Modular architecture Modular architecture
components integration and components integration components integration & test components integration & test
test for I/ITSEC. (1Q) and test. (2Q) (2Q) (FY04, 2Q)

(U) Contract Milestones

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 23 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Systems Engineering MIPR Air Force Research Lab 0.415 01/01 0.430 02/02 0.481 01/03 Continuing Continuing
Systems Engineering WX & WR NAWCTSD, NAMRL 0.813 01/01 0.674 02/02 0.808 01/03 Continuing Continuing

Award Fees
Subtotal Product Development 1.228 1.104 1.289 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Trainer Development Support FP/C NAWC-AD 0.110 12/00 0.120 02/02 0.130 12/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Support 0.110 0.120 0.130 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 24 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development W2124/Air Warfare Training Development
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation WX NAWC-AD 0.637 01/01 0.579 01/02 0.660 01/03 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal T&E 0.637 0.579 0.660 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Travel WX NAWC-AD 0.031 12/00 0.027 01/02 0.036 12/02 Continuing Continuing
SBIR Assessment 0.057 0.057

Subtotal Management 0.031 0.084 0.036 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 2.006 1.887 2.115 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 25 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)
ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE Total
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 11.031 11.208 10.825 10.778 7.218 6.462 6.452 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The employment of naval forces in a multi-dimensional warfare environment is a complex operational problem. To counter
the threat expected in hostile environments, naval officer training must be provided for all mission areas on a real-time basis at the Battle Force/Group level. This training must focus on tactical
decision-making, tactics development/evaluation, and operational planning/execution. Shore-based classroom training and at-sea exercises have historically satisfied the Battle Group tactical
training requirement. However, the effectiveness of this approach to training was reduced by the lack of a real-time decision-making environment during shore-based training and the reduction in
number and scope of at-sea exercises. This requirement is fulfilled by the Joint Simulation System (JSIMS), which will replace the Enhanced Naval Warfare Gaming System (ENWGS), a legacy
modeling and simulation training system.

(U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Joint Simulation System (JSIMS) will replace ENWGS and provide expanded functionality. The mission of JSIMS is to
provide a readily available, operationally valid synthetic environment for the Commanders-in-Chief (CINCs), their components, other Joint organizations and the Services to: Jointly train, educate,
develop doctrine and tactics, formulate and assess operational plans, assess warfighting situations, define operational requirements, and provide operational inputs to the acquisition process. In
short, JSIMS will provide not only an improved certified capability for inter-Service operability but also an enhanced Joint Battle Staff training capability for the warfighting CINCs. All service
Executive Agents (EAs) and Development Agents (DAs) are required to contribute to the initial population of the JSIMS architecture with facilities, services and tools, to meet an Initial Operational
Capability (IOC) for Joint Task Force (JTF) training of no later than March 2003. In keeping with the premise that the Services/components are best able to define their own capabilities and
functionality, the JSIMS Alliance Executive Office (AEO) is working in concert with the Services to import Service-provided functionality such as land, air, and naval and littoral warfare to JSIMS.
The AEO will integrate these functionalities for use by Joint Army/Marine/Navy/Air Force exercise. JSIMS development is incremental.

In June 1994 the Services and Director Joint Program Office signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to establish JSIMS, a critical next-generation Modeling and Simulation (M&S) system.
The long-term goal of the agreement is to integrate the range of missions of the Armed Forces within a common framework. That framework provides a balanced melding of live, virtual and
constructive M&S representations, with Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I) fully supported, and interfaces using real-world equipment. As the Maritime
Warfare EA, OPNAV N7, on 29 August 1995, assigned NAVSEA as the JSIMS Maritime Development Agent (DA). The objective of the JSIMS Maritime portion of the JSIMS Program is to train at
all levels of command, in all warfare areas, including joint and service specific training. JSIMS Maritime is developing the Maritime Mission Space Objects for the JSIMS Program, as well as
selected portions of the core infrastructure and services to be determined when the Joint Object Model is partitioned. JSIMS was transferred from NAVSEA to SPAWAR PD13 at the beginning of
FY 1999. Due to a reorganization at SPAWAR, the JSIMS-M Program now resides in PD15. On 16 December 1999, USD (AT&L) published a memorandum directing that JSIMS be reorganized
per the recommendations made by the JSIMS Senior Review Board. These recommendations were detailed in a 19 November 1999 Senior Review Board memorandum. Specifically, JSIMS was
directed to convert system architecture to the High-Level Architecture (HLA) standard, establish a JSIMS Alliance Executive Office, develop a new Acquisition Program Baseline (APB), and
transfer Program Executive Office (PEO) responsibilities from Air Force to Army. USD (AT&L) has also designated JSIMS as an ACAT-1D program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item

184
No.

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 26 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)

(U) B. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

·($9.205) – Completed all Object Oriented Analyses for Increments 3, 4, 5 and 6 models which included close in weapons systems, cruise missiles, fixed wing aircraft, flight deck operations, Identify Friend or Foe
(IFF), rockets, surface-to-air missiles, battle damage assessment, infrared sensors, radar, torpedoes, towing, ship and submarine kinematics, tactical organizations, platform track processing, dipping sonar, flight
deck operations part 2, logistics, and mine-laying.

· ($1.176) - Conducted testing and validation for Maritime models included in increments 1-3.

· ($.096) - Conducted JSIMS Federation Integration and testing events 1-3.

· ($.554) - Developed database attribute libraries for fixed wing aircraft, rotary wing aircraft, and naval bases. Developed databases for sensors, weapons and countermeasures.

2. (U) FY 2002 PLAN:

· ($1.183) - Provide Maritime Content Library, Data Management Tool, and Data Element Description Document for JSIMS Version 1.0 Provide metadata and battlespace data for Maritime Federate for associated
Alliance Integration Events. Provide operational support for associated functional verification tests and user events.

· ($2.652) - Complete requirements analysis and define design requirements for Maritime Federate development of JSIMS Version 2.0. Provide model expositions for Maritime Domain scripted missions and model
representations for JSIMS Version 2.0. Provide operational support for associated functional verification tests and user events.

· ($4.252) - Provide unit-tested Maritime Federate and master track processor software for JSIMS Version 1.0. Provide unit-tested Maritime Federate software for initial Federation Integration Events for JSIMS
Version 2.0.

·($1.988) - Provide engineering verification test (EVT) results for Maritime Federate software for functional increments for JSIMS Version 1.0. Provide EVT results for first increment of Maritime Federate software
for JSIMS Version 2.0. Complete functional verification testing for Maritime Federate software for Version Release Milestone (VRM) 1.0. Provide technical support for associated Alliance integration/system test
and user events.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 27 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)

(U) B. PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS (CONTINUED):

·($1.133) - Provide assigned software products to support Maritime workstation displays and interactive controls to Common Component Workstation Developer. Provide operational support for JSIMS Alliance
integration/system test and user events. Provide operational and training support for deployment of JSIMS to Navy sites. Complete requirements analysis for Maritime workstation for VRM 2.0.

3. (U) FY 2003 PLAN:

·($1.461) - Provide Maritime content library, data management tool and data element description document for JSIMS Version 2.0. Provide metadata and battlespace data for Maritime Federate for associated
Alliance Integration Events. Continue to provide operational support for functional verification tests and user events.

·($2.978) - Provide remaining model expositions for Maritime Domain scripted missions and model representations for JSIMS Version 2.0. Complete requirements analysis and define design requirements for
Maritime Federate development JSIMS Version 3.0.

·($3.809) - Provide unit-tested Maritime Federate software for remaining Federation Integration Events for JSIMS Version 2.0.

·($2.277) - Provide EVT results for remainder of Maritime Federate software for JSIMS Version 2.0. Complete functional verification testing for Maritime Federate software for VRM 2.0. Provide technical support
for associated Alliance integration/system test and user events.

·($.300) - Provide assigned software products to support Maritime workstation displays and interactive controls. Complete requirements analysis for Maritime workstation VRM 3.0.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 28 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 9.579 11.308 11.548
(U) Appropriated Value: 9.579 11.308
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: 1.452 -0.100 -0.723
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 11.031 11.208 10.825

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 2001: Section 8086: 0.7% Pro-Rata Reduction (-$0.067M), Government-Wide Rescission: PL 106-554, Sec 14 (-$0.021M), SBIR Assessment (-$.160M), ASN(RDA) BTR for Naval
Surface
Studies (-$0.187M), ASN(RDA) BTR for JSIMS (+$2.0M), Miscellaneous Navy Adjustments (-$.113M).
FY 2002: Section 8123, Management Reform Initiative (-$.100M).
FY 2003: Miscellaneous Navy Adjustments -($.723M) for carryover, rates, inflation, etc.

(U) Schedule: No significant adjustments. Current schedule displayed in paragraph E, below.

(U) Technical: "Not Applicable"

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete Total Cost
BLI: 2760 / Other SPAWAR Training 1.319 1.777 1.001 2.911 2.197 2.447 2.625 Continuing Continuing
BA: 1 AGSAG: 1C4C JSIMS-M 1.885 4.723 4.416 5.682 5.675 5.752 5.920 Continuing Continuing

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 29 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: N/A

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones Q4 M/S C

Q4 Navy IOC

(U) Engineering Milestones Federation Integration Federation Integration

Events 1-3 Events 4 and 5
VRM 1.0

(U) T&E Milestones Functional Assess- OT&E Continues

ments 1 & 2

Early Operational
Assessment
System Functional
Assessment
Domain Validation
Security Test & Evaluation
Functional Testing
Operational Assessment
OT&E
(U) Contract Milestones N/A

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 30 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Systems Engineering WR/RCP VARIOUS 5.615 2.046 11/00 2.567 11/01 2.248 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Licenses WR/RCP SSCSD, CA 0.408 Continuing Continuing
Software Development WR/RCP VARIOUS 0.000 3.282 11/00 3.513 11/01 3.429 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Software Development WR/RCP SSCSD, CA 17.956 1.356 1.576 1.210 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Product Development 23.979 6.684 7.656 6.887 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Technical Data WR/RCP SSCSD, CA 2.318 0.404 0.689 0.654 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Support 2.318 0.404 0.689 0.654 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 31 of 32)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Project Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0204571N/Consolidated Training Systems Development X1823/Training & Modeling Systems (TMS)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation WR/RCP VARIOUS 2.419 1.284 11/00 0.881 11/01 1.031 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Development Test & Evaluation WR/RCP SSCSD, CA 0.344 0.587 0.688 Continuing Continuing
Operational Test & Evaluation WR/RCP VARIOUS 0.134 0.101 11/00 0.144 11/01 0.203 11/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal T&E 2.553 1.729 1.612 1.922 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support WR/RCP VARIOUS 2.193 1.854 11/00 0.858 11/01 0.940 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Government Engineering Support WR/RCP SSCSD, CA 2.029 0.300 0.328 0.357 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Travel WR/RCP SPAWAR 0.093 0.060 11/00 0.065 11/01 0.065 11/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Management 4.315 2.214 1.251 1.362 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 33.165 11.031 11.208 10.825 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 184

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 32 of 32)
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY : RDT&E,N/7 R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
INFORMATION WARFARE 0204575N
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: FEB 2002
COST ($ in Millions) FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Cost to Complete Total Cost
Z2263 Information Warfare 3.246 4.285 4.594 6.155 6.674 7.166 8.724 7.587 CONT. CONT.
Defense Emergency Response Fund 9.000 9.000 11.000 11.000 9.000
(DERF)/Cost of War (COW) *
Quantity of RDT&E Articles VAR VAR TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD CONT. CONT.

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification :

The Naval Information Warfare Activity (NIWA) serves as the Program Manager for the OFFENSIVE IW program. As such NIWA is tasked as the Navy’s principal technical agent to research, assess,
develop and prototype Information Warfare (IW) capabilities. The key focus is to provide tactical commanders with both an IW Mission Planning, Analysis, and Command and Control Targeting System
(IMPACTS) tool and state-of-the-art Electronic Attack hardware and software. FY02 will continue design of the second generation USQ -146 (RUBICON II). This project will continue with upgrade s to
the USQ-146 through the out -years. Ongoing software efforts are to identify and develop integrated IW Planning and Execution tools.

*DERF/COW funds provided for RUBICON. Funds will be used to integrate Information Operations Electronic Support (ES) systems with Electronic Attack (EA) weapons system/capabilities in accordance
with the Shipboard Info Warfare/Cryptologic systems ORD # 537-06-99. Efforts support war on terrorism by providing capability to deny, degrade or disrupt terrorist command, control and
communications. Integrated IO system can disrupt radio -controlled weapons. Additional funding provided in support of Classified Special Access Programs (not identified). Details available under separate
cover.

B. Program Change Summary: Miscellaneous funding adjustments are detailed below.

COST ($ in Millions) FY 00 FY 01 FY02 FY 03

PB02 3.246 4.414 4.635

Misc Program Adjustments 0.000 -0.129 -0.041
President’s Budget 03 3.246 4.285 4.594 6.155

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 185

Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 3)
 Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification Date: FEB 2002
RDT&E,N BA-7 0204575N INFORMATION WARFARE Z2263

Cost ($ in Millions) FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 3.246 4.285 4.594 6.155 6.674 7.166 8.724 7.587 CONT. CONT.
RDT&E Articles Qty VAR VAR VAR TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD CONT. CONT.

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

FY 2001 Accomplishments
(2.582) IMPACTS Updates
(1.703) Electronic Attack
FY 2002 Accomplishments & Plan
(3.094) IMPACTS Updates
(1.500) Electronic Attack
FY 2003 Plan
(2.756) IMPACTS Updates
(1.899) Electronic Attack
(1.500) Computer Network Defense

B. Other Program Funding Summary

ToTotal
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 Complete Cost
OMN Line 4B7N 1.789 1.985 2.313 2.432 2.518 2.713 2.776 2.847 CONT. CONT.
OPN 234000/6 4.003 3.866 2.882 5.158 4.661 5.578 6.349 5.462 CONT. CONT.

C. Acquisition Strategy: This is a non-ACAT program.

D. Schedule Profile:
IMPACTS: Convert IMPACTS/GCCS-M software (RFMP and CM+) operating system format and support laboratory and shipboard tests of converted software. Continue
transition to PC based software in addition to current, UNIX based Graphical User Interface (GUI). Institute a Federated Object Model (FOM) into all IW mission planning support
software. Initiate inclusion of EMPIRE, RFMP, C2WC, CM+ into Mission Planning Manager. The software planned for delivery in April 2001 has been delayed. The SPAWAR
GCCS-M 4.X software test cycle has slipped until January 2002 and June 2002.

Perception Management: Continued modification of the NIWA/NRL software suite to provide visual evaluation of the impact of tactical deception plans on an enemy’s ability to
detect ship movements using RADAR.

Electronic Attack: Initiated design of second generation RUBICON II. Completed procurement of four AN/USQ-146 units and spares. The program has also provided carry-on
Electronic Support Measures (ESM) systems for deploying battle groups, supported USMC Mobile Electronic Warfare System (MEWS) evaluation and adoption of AN/USQ-146
R-1 Shopping List Item No. 185
Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 3)
 Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification Date: FEB 2002
and (Joint Special Operations Command) JSOC evaluation of modified AN/USQ-146 in a helicopter.

Operationalizing Computer Network Defense: Provide manpower, operational command and control, operating funds and state of the art computer hardware and software to
rapidly integrate Computer Network Defense (CND) concepts and capabilities into Navy fleet and shore operations.

Navy Information Operations (IO), Architecture, Training and Data Management: Provides focus in 3 primary functional areas of IO: Electronic Warfare (EW); Computer Network
Defense (CND); and Perception Management (PM). The timely development of the Navy IO architecture is key to the alignment of Navy IO with Fleet Operational requirements
and the Navy Strategic Planning Guidance (NSPG).

Cost ($ in Millions) FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07

IMPACTS 2.582 3.094 2.756 2.789 2.781 3.189 2.880

Perception Management 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100
Electronic Attack 1.703 1.500 1.899 1.600 2.100 3.250 2.422
Computer Net Defense 0.000 0.000 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
Navy IO 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.685 0.685 0.685 0.685

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 185

Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 3)
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: FEB 2002
RDT&E,N/7 Program Element: 0204575N INFORMATION WARFARE/Z2263
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY02 FY03 FY03 Target
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Requirements) Method Activity & PYs FY01 Award Cost Award Cost Award Cost To Total Value of
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Date Date Complete Cost Contract
Primary Hardware Development Var Var 1.500 0.743 Var 1.115 Var 1.000 Var Cont. Cont.

Subtotal Product Development 1.500 0.743 Var 1.115 Var 1.000 Var Cont. Cont.
Cost of War* RUBICON FFP 9.000 12/02 40.000 49.000 49.000

Development Support Var Var 0.500 1.414 Var 1.079 Var 1.956 Var Cont. Cont.
Software Development Var Var 0.487 1.069 1Q01 1.965 1Q02 2.699 1Q03 Cont. Cont.

Subtotal Support .987 2.483 Var 3.044 Var 4.655 Var Cont. Cont.
Remarks

Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis

(Exhibit R-3, page 1 of 2)

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 185

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis Date: FEB 2002
RDT&E,N/7 Program Element: 0204575N INFORMATION WARFARE/Z2263
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Requirements) Method Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation Var Var 0.300 0.600 Var 0 0 0

Subtotal T&E 0.300 0.600 Var

Remarks

AIS Support Var Var 0 0.059 Var 0 0 0 0 Cont. Cont.

Government Engineering Support Var Var 0.200 0.200 .185 Var 0.250 Var Cont. Cont.
Program Management Support Var Var 0.259 0.200 .250 Var 0.250 Var Cont. Cont.

Subtotal Management 0.459 0.459 Var 0.435 Var 0.500 Var Cont. Cont.
Remarks

Total Cost 3.246 4.285 Var 4.594 Var 6.155 Var Cont. Cont.
Remarks

(Exhibit R-3, page 2 of 2)

R-1 Shopping List Item No. 185

 UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 38.544 28.080 60.758 76.192 95.602 90.166 67.346 Continuing Continuing

A1780* HARM Improvement 9.029 12.221 3.901 2.113 1.842 3.845 3.886 Continuing Continuing
A2185* Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile ** ***
(AARGM) 26.741 14.570 48.710 54.712 69.416 69.278 59.254 Continuing Continuing

A2211* Modernized Hellfire** 2.774 1.289 8.147 14.492 6.473 4.158 4.206 Continuing Continuing

A3056 Advanced Precision Kill Weapons 4.875 12.907 12.885 30.667

A3057 Common Defense Weapon System 4.964 4.964

Quantity of RDT&E Articles Not Applicable

*Prior years funding was executed under project units E2185 and W2185.
**The FY01 budget reflects a $20M Congressional Add for AARGM executed under A2661 ($15M for AARGM) and A2983 ($5M for QuickBolt). These funds were reduced by $.184 million for Congressional Reductions.
*** The FY02 budget reflects a $14.7M Congressional Add for AARGM risk reduction efforts and producibility enhancements under A2661. These funds were reduced by $.130 million for Congressional Reductions.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(U) A1780/HIGH-SPEED ANTI-RADIATION (HARM) IMPROVEMENT: The International HARM Upgrade Program (IHUP) (Block IIIB/VI) is a tri-national Precision Navigation Unit (PNU) cooperative program consisting of
a USN-unique tactical software upgrade and a hardware upgrade which includes an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. This upgrade will provide a much improved guidance
capability for the current AGM-88B missile (in German and Italian inventories) and AGM-88C missile (in U.S. inventory). This IMU/GPS system will be retrofitted into existing missiles, as a kit.

(U) A2185/ADVANCED ANTI-RADIATION GUIDED MISSILE (AARGM) and A2661/AARGM (Congressional Add): AARGM is a Phase III Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program designed to demonstrate an
advanced multi-mode seeker on an existing High speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) airframe. A2983/QuickBolt (QB) is an Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) of Joint-suppression of Enemy Air
Defense (J-SEAD) technology enhancements applicable to AARGM. An AARGM System Development and Demonstration (SD&D) will commence in FY03. The AARGM program plans production of 1,750 missiles (60
Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and 1,690 Full Rate Production modification kits). For ease of tracking, Project Units W2661, E2661, A2661, and A2983 are included in the A2185 funding profile.

(U) A2211/MODERNIZED HELLFIRE: Modernized Hellfire (MH) is the joint service program to support approved Army and USMC Mission Need Statements for future multi-role precision guided weapons. To fulfill these
needs, the DON is participating with the Army in joint trade studies, requirements validation analysis, Advanced Technology Demonstration programs, hardware development, Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), and the
development of Milestone support documentation. Specific potential applications include development of a single multi-role weapon to replace the legacy TOW, Maverick, and Hellfire missiles, as well as development of a
low cost guidance capability for the legacy unguided 2.75" rocket system.

U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing,
operational systems.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 9.029 12.221 3.901 2.113 1.842 3.845 3.886 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) is a joint service program with the Air Force (NAVY lead). The program has been in full production since FY 1983. Program Element 0205601N was used until FY
1990 to develop and test one hardware and two software upgrades to the HARM as Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs). Another ECP software program (Block V) was recently developed (FY96 through FY99) to
modify HARM software in order to meet operational requirements. The Block V tactical software upgrade gives HARM improved geographic specificity and improved capability against advanced waveforms. HARM
Block V software was distributed to the Fleet in FY00.

The International HARM Upgrade Program (IHUP)/Precision Navigation Unit (PNU) is a tri-national (U.S., Italy, and Germany) cooperative program designed to improve the HARM’s effectiveness by enhancing the
missile’s probability of kill and reducing the potential for fratricide while making the missile easier to employ. The Program consists of significant hardware and software modifications to the missile’s control and guidance
sections. The USN frequently refers to the IHUP upgrade as Block IIIB/VI. The three nations involved have agreed to jointly fund the design, development, testing and production of hardware kits to be installed in the
missile control section along with an improved software version to be installed in the missile guidance section. The HARM Block IIIB/VI program started development in FY98 and will commence production in FY03.
Funding in FY00 through FY03 is dedicated to the HARM Block IIIB/IV program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($5.266) Continued design/development of Inertial Measurement sub-systems and development of hardware and software associated with Block IIIB/VI.
Continued development of Block VI USN unique software sub-routines.

(U) ($.256) Continued Engineering and Project Management Services in support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI) contract.

(U) ($1.027) Continued Government engineering support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI) including preparation for Critical Design Review of Block VI software/hardware design.
Effort includes further engineering studies, threat analysis, 6 Degrees of Freedom (DOF) analysis, documentation analysis, interface definition, precision navigation engineering, and software
quality evaluation.

(U) ($.145) Continued Government support of contractor testing including evaluation of test plans, reports, and preparation of detailed test planning documentation, and captive flight testing.
Coordinated/attended/chaired the Joint Test Plan Working Group and coordinate necessary program activities in support of future year Development Test/Operational Test (DT/OT).

(U) ($.176) Continued Government logistic support including logistics support analyses, maintenance engineering, support equipment engineering, and evaluating contractor designs.

(U) ($2.159) Continued Government and contractor participation in integration efforts. Continued developing the aircraft avionics updates required by the HARM Upgrade Program (Block VI) in
addition to Command Launch Computer (CLC)/TAMPS upgrade efforts. Continued to develop HARM TAMPS/Mission Planning Module (MPM) rehost.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement

2. FY2002 PLAN:

(U) ($3.680) Continue design/development of Inertial Measurement sub-systems and development of hardware and software associated with Block IIIB/VI.
Continue development of Block VI USN unique software sub-routines.

(U) ($.252) Continue Engineering and Project Management Services in support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI) contract.

(U) ($.803) Continue Government engineering support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI) including preparation for Production Readiness Reviews of Block VI software/hardware
design. Effort includes further engineering studies, documentation analysis, interface definition, precision navigation engineering, and software quality evaluation.

(U) ($.720) Continue Government support of contractor testing including evaluation of test plans, reports, and preparation of detailed test planning documentation, and captive flight testing.
Coordinate/attend/chair the Joint Test Plan Working Group and coordinate necessary program activities in support of combined DT/OT. Continue to provide on site support to DT/OT and perform
data reduction, test matrix review and prepare DT report.

(U) ($.886) Continue Government logistic support including logistics support analyses, maintenance engineering, support equipment engineering, and evaluating contractor designs.

(U) ($3.310) Continue Government and contractor participation in integration efforts. Continue developing the aircraft avionics updates required by the HARM Upgrade Program (Block VI) in
addition to Command Launch Computer (CLC)/TAMPS upgrade efforts, TACMAN and part Task Trainer updates, and ELINT development. Continue to develop HARM TAMPS/Mission Planning
rehost.

(U) ($2.200) Redesign Guided Missile Launcher Test Set (GMLTS) to develop capability to verify and test PNU upgrade configuration during missile reprogramming.

(U) ($.370) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business inovation Research assessment in accordance with 15USC 68.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement

3. FY 2003 PLAN:

(U) ($.200) Continue Engineering and Project Management Services in support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI) contract.

(U) ($ .997) Continue Government Independent Operation Test and Evaluation support of the HARM Upgrade Program (Block IIIB/VI). Prepare Operational Testing final report.
Conduct Product Assement Review of test units in support of production readiness analysis. Initiate Engineering Change Proposal development,

(U) ($ .200) Initiate and review the development of Engineering Change Proposal requirements/design changes.

(U) ($.635) Continue Government logistic support including logistics support analyses, maintenance engineering, support equipment engineering, and evaluating contractor designs.

(U) ($1.869) Continue Government participation in integration efforts. Continue developing the aircraft avionics updates required by HARM, Command Launch Computer (CLC)/TAMPS
upgrade efforts, TACMAN and part Task Trainer updates, and ELINT development to enable HARM to meet current and evolving threats.
Continue to develop HARM TAMPS/Mission Planning rehost.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION: Unclassified

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 9.368 12.330
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: -0.339 -0.109
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 9.029 12.221 3.901

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY2001 reflects a decrease of $.339 resulting from a $.308 million decrease for Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Assessment and a $.031 million decrease for reprioritization
of requirements within the Navy.
FY2002 reflects a decrease of $.109 million for an undistributed Congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Reflects slippage of FTR by one quarter and slippage of the Combined DT/OT by two quarters as a result of delayed delivery of the Global Positioning System (GPS)
units being incorporated in the HARM Precision Navigation Upgrade Engineering Evaluation Units. Milestone III decision date will not be affected.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

WPN BLI 232700, HARM MODS 0 0 4.959 8.018 8.197 8.417 8.639 0

Related RDT&E: Not applicable.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Unclassified

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

The HARM Block IIIB/VI Upgrade program is an ACAT III Program and will consist of three separate phases (EMD, Production, and Technology Evaluation and Assessment). The acquisition strategy for
the HARM Block IIIB/VI Program is complete and is based upon a signed international Memorandum of Agreement with Germany, Italy, and the U.S. Navy; a tri-national Cooperative Operational Requirements
Document (CORD) details German, Italian, and U.S. Navy common requirements; and a Cooperative Test and Evaluation Master Plan (CTEMP) summarizes all test requirements. These three documents
drive the overall acquisition approach to the HARM Block VI project.

Management of the Block IIIB/VI upgrade will be directed by a trilateral Steering Committee, however, the U.S. Navy Project Manager (in concert with Project Managers from Germany and Italy) is
responsible for Program execution. Each partner will share one-third of “common costs,” the U.S. Navy will fund Block VI unique costs, and the German and Italian participants will fund Block IIIB unique
costs. Each country will pay its own aircraft integration costs.

The acquisition strategy delineates Industry and Government responsibilities. The contract strategy (i.e. hardware and software for missile, upgraded missile sections, contractor team responsibility for
missile performance) assigns unique work tasks to each firm. Contract strategy is to issue contracts to Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik GmbH (BGT) (German), Alenia Marconi System (AMS) (Italian), and
Raytheon Missile Systems (RMS) (U.S.) firms and will maximize use of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS)/government-off-the-shelf (GOTS)/non-development items (NDI). Each Phase I (EMD) contract type
and structure is tailored to the product of each firm.

The IHUP Production Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) will include a production run of only five years with a product of relatively low price. The current IHUP sources producing EMD and LRIP units
are planned to produce the production units under the HARM Mods WPN Appropriation Line Item 2032700. The acquisition strategy has been restructured to include a Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP)
which will commence in FY03 under the PNU Modification Program. The current IHUP sources producing EMD and LRIP units are planned to produce the production units.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 To Complete

(U) Program Milestones MS III (4Q/03)

(U) Engineering Milestones CDR(2Q/01)

FTRR(2Q/02)

(U) T&E Milestones Combined DT/OT Combined DT/OT

(Start 2Q/01) (End 4Q/02)

* BGT and AMS Contracts are not funded with U.S. funds, but are significant milestones in the Block IIIB/VI contract schedule.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Block IIIB/VI Development C/CPIF RSC, Tuc AZ 6.535 5.266 11/00 5.880 11/01 17.681 17.681
Block VI Development/ECP WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 1.442 1.027 10/00 0.803 10/01 0.200 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Block VI ILS WX NAWC WD, Point Mugu, Ca 0.434 0.176 10/00 0.886 10/01 0.635 10/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Product Development 8.411 6.469 7.569 0.835 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Subtotal Support

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A1780 HARM Improvement
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Block IIIB/VI WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 1.691 0.145 10/00 0.720 10/01 0.997 10/02 Continuing Continuing
HARM Technical/Integration Studies WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 5.304 2.159 10/00 3.310 10/01 1.869 10/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal T&E 6.995 2.304 4.030 2.866 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Block VI Travel WX NAWCAD, Patuxent, MD 0.190 0.087 10/00 0.052 10/01 0.030 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Block VI Tech Assess/Mgmt Sup RX DCS, Norfolk VA 1.205 0.169 02/01 0.200 12/01 0.170 12/02 1.745 1.745
SBIR Assessment 0.370 0.370

Subtotal Management 1.395 0.256 0.622 0.200 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 16.801 9.029 12.221 3.901 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185* Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program
* **
Project Cost 26.741 14.570 48.710 54.712 69.416 69.278 59.254 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

*The FY01 budget reflects a $20M Congressional Add: $15M for AARGM producibility enhancements under A2661, and $5M for the QuickBolt ACTD under A2983. These funds were reduced by $.184 million for
Congressional Reductions.
** The FY02 budget reflects a $14.7M Congressional Add for AARGM risk reduction efforts and producibility enhancements under A2661. These funds were reduced by $.130 million for Congressional Reductions.

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) Project transitions a Phase III Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) program to develop and demonstrate a multi-mode guidance section on a HARM
airframe to System Development and Demonstration (SD&D) in FY03. The AARGM Phase III SD&D program is designed to integrate a Multi-mode (passive Anti-Radiation Homing (ARH)/active Millimeter Wave (MMW)
Radar/Global Positioning system/Inertial Navigation System (GPS/INS)) on the HARM missile to engage and destroy enemy air defenses in the event that these systems “shut-down” or employ other countermeasures.

The issue of emitter “shut-down” as a defensive tactic has been a major shortcoming in the joint suppression of enemy air defenses (J-SEAD) element of the offensive counter air mission area for the United States
Navy and Air Force. Program objectives are to achieve an effective and affordable lethal SEAD capability against mobile, relocatable, or fixed air defense threats even in the presence of emitter shutdown or other Anti-
Radiation Missile (ARM) countermeasures. The multi-mode technology being integrated in the AARGM program resolves the problem of “shut-down”.

The AARGM Advanced Technology Demonstration ATD technology demonstration program was an outgrowth of a Phase I and II competitive SBIR program. Phase I and II SBIR efforts successfully demonstrated
the feasibility of a multi-mode seeker to address radar “shut-down” issues. Science and Applied Technology (SAT), Inc. (San Diego, CA), was awarded Phase I and II contracts (FY90-93) and was subsequently selected
for a Phase III demonstration in FY94. Phase III ATD work is being performed by SAT under NAVAIR contract N00019-94-C-0078. This contractual effort will result in a cumulative contract value of $183.9M. The
AARGM ATD will complete in FY 2002. The AARGM program is the vehicle for the Quick Bolt Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD). Quick Bolt adds the ability to receive threat data from national
assets, enlarging the target set and increasing aircrew situational awareness, and to transmit a Weapon Impact Assessment (WIA) message to assist in the critical area of Battle Damage Assessment (BDA). The Quick
Bolt ACTD is planned for completion in FY 2003. AARGM will commence System Development and Demonstration (SD&D) in FY03. The AARGM/QB program plans production of 1,750 missiles (60 Low Rate Initial
Production (LRIP) modification kits and 1,690 Full Rate Production kits).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($3,348) Contractor completed captive flight testing of the AARGM brassboard. Contractor completed development of AARGM prototype Guided Test Vehicle (GTV),
to include hardware/software design upgrades, subsystems assembly and test, prototype integration and testing, and prototype captive carry test and data analysis. The GTV-1 missile
firing was successfully conducted and all test objectives achieved in 4Q01.

(U) ($3,459) Field activity completed AARGM system engineering support of development and systems integration efforts. Completed weapon system testing studies to assess weapons
technology performance and deficiencies.

(U) ($.768) Contractor performed program management and engineering services in support of the AARGM technology demonstration program. Provided technical management support
and coordination of AARGM Program weapons system technology studies

(U) ($14,371) Contractor continued Risk Reduction and Producibility (RR/PE) enhancement acitivities including performance and affordability enhancements of the Anti-Radiation
Homing (ARH) receiver, the MillimeterWave (MMW) Radar Transceiver, the Composite Radome, and the ARH Full-Band Antenna Array. Related efforts included plating of frequency
selective surface onto the Pyrocevam Radome and radar gimbal design trades.

(U) ($4,700) Contractor continued Quick Bolt Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) acitivities to demonstrate the utility of integrating off board sensor cueing
into a new HARM seeker and the utility of providing Weapon Impact Assessment data for BDA cueing. The Quick Bolt System Requirements Review and System Design Review
were completed.

(U) ($.095) Completed Government technical management, engineering support, and coordination of AARGM Program weapons system technology development program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

2. FY 2002 Plan:

(U) ($11,600) Contractor to complete Risk Reduction and Producibility activities including ARH receiver development, ARH Full-Band development and
MMW tactical waveform development.

(U) ($2,310) Field activity to continue to provide AARGM system engineering and testing support associated with ATD.

(U) ($.600) Contractor to perform engineering and technical evaluation services to support program management of AARGM.

(U) (.060) Government to provide technical management, engineering support, and coordination of AARGM ATD activities including preparation for and
conduct of Milestone B for AGM-88E AARGM SD&D.

3. FY 2003 Plan:

(U) ($24,000) Contractor to commence System Development & Demonstration (SD&D) effort. Contractor to conduct Integrated Baseline Review (IBR). Contractor to update the
Advanced Technology Demonstration (ATD) subsystem designs to the SD&D System Performance Specification and prepare for System Design Review (SDR). Contractor to conduct
SDR.

(U) ($8,710) Field activity to commence AARGM system engineering support associated with SD&D.

(U) ($1,875) Contractor to perform engineering and technical evaluation services to support program management of AARGM.

(U) ($.125) Government to provide technical management, engineering support, and coordination of AARGM Program weapons system technology development program.

(U) ($14,000) Contractor to complete Quick Bolt Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) acitivities to demonstrate the utility of integrating off board sensor cueing
into a new HARM seeker and the utility of providing Weapon Impact Assessment data for BDA cueing. Contractor to support Military Utility Assessment activities including
hardware in-the-loop testing, field testing, and missile live firings. Contractor to deliver residual ACTD assets.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 27.717 0
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: -0.976 14.570
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 26.741 14.570 48.710

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY2001 reflects a decrease of $.976 million including a $.946 million reduction for Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Assessment and $.030 million reduction for
reprioritization of requirements within the Navy.
FY2002 reflects an increase of $14.570 million resulting from an increase of $14.700 million for AARGM and a decrease of $.130 million for an undistributed Congressional reduction.
(U) Schedule:
The scheduled completion of the AARGM ATD program slipped from 4Q01 to 2Q02 as a result of delays associated with Captive Flight Testing. Captive Flight Testing delays were
driven by challenges with flight qualification of the Anti-radiation Homing Receiver hardware, vibration failure with Global Positioning System hardware, test aircraft availability, and foul
weather. GTV Live Fire Test and Analysis commenced in 4/01 and will complete in 2Q/02.
(U) Technical: Reflects definition of tasks associated with the FY02 Congressional Add for Risk Reduction/Producibility enhancements.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete
WPN BLI 232700, HARM MODS 0 0 0 0 0 24.689 35.486 Continuing

Related RDT&E: Not applicable

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:

The AARGM program started as a Phase I Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR), Advanced Technology Program (ATD), and has evolved into a Phase III SBIR
program transitioning into System Development and Demonstration (SD&D). The AARGM SD&D fulfills U.S. Navy operational requirements and the SD&D incorporates
AARGM system requirements. Small Business Administration Code of Regulation rules for Phase III SBIRs are being used for this SD&D. Government responsibilities
for both the ATD and SD&D include monitoring, technical assessment and validation of contractor technology development and testing.

The Quick Bolt Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) will be completed in FY03 and transitioned into the AARGM SD&D.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186 Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE

The AARGM program is an Advanced Technology Program and therefore does not have a standard detailed Milestone Plan. A list of key actions appears below.

AARGM PROGRAM FY 2001 FY2002 FY2003 To Complete

Brassboard Captive Flight Tests (CFTs)

Unique Design and CFT Preparation
Contractor Managed Testing
Captive Flight Testing Commenced 4Q/01 Complete 2Q/02

Guided Test Vehicles (GTVs)

Hardware/Software Design Upgrades Complete 2Q/02
Subsystems Assembly and Test Complete 2Q/02
Integration and Test Complete 2Q/02
GTV Live Fire Test and Analysis Commenced 4Q/01 Complete 3Q/02

Contractor Design and Trade Studies 4Q/02

Milestone B - System Development & Demonstration (SD&D) Decision 4Q/02

QUICK BOLT PROGRAM

System Requirements Review (SRR) 2Q/01
System Design Review (SDR) 3Q/01
Military Utility Assessment 3Q/03
ACTD Final Report 3Q/03

SD&D

Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) 3Q/03

System Design Review (SDR) 4Q/03
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) 1Q/04
Critical Design Review (CDR) 2Q/04
Production Readiness Review (PRR) 4Q/05
Milestone C - Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Decision 1Q/06

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Adv Tech Dev and Risk Reduction CPFF SAT, Woodland Hills, CA 95.214 3.348 12/00 11.600 02/02 110.162 110.162
Engineering Support WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 12.152 3.459 10/00 1.160 02/02 8.710 10/02 47.760 73.241
Engineering/Tech Assessment CPIF JHU/APL, MD 0.615 0.615 0.615
Risk Reduction CPFF SAT, Woodland Hills, CA 23.805 14.371 04/01 38.176 38.176
Quick Bolt CPFF SAT, Woodland Hills, CA 4.700 11/01 14.000 12/02 18.700 18.700
AARGM/QB SD&D CPFF SAT, Woodland Hills, CA 24.000 12/02 177.000 201.000 201.000

Subtotal Product Development 131.786 25.878 12.760 46.710 224.760 441.894

Remarks:

Subtotal Support

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 15 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2185 Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
SD&D Test and Evaluation Support WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 1.150 02/02 22.400 23.550

Subtotal T&E 1.150 22.400 23.550

Remarks:

Travel WX NAWCAD, Patuxent, MD 0.280 0.095 10/00 0.060 02/02 0.125 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Technical Assessment/Mgmt Supp RX/LOE DCS Alexandria, VA 2.468 0.768 12/00 0.600 02/02 1.875 11/02 5.000 10.711 10.711

Subtotal Management 2.748 0.863 0.660 2.000 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 134.534 26.741 14.570 48.710 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 16 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2211 JAWS*
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2.774 1.289 8.147 14.492 6.473 4.158 4.206 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

*Funding for FY00 was executed under Project Unit E2211 and the Joint Advanced Weapons Systems (JAWS) RDT&E line. PU A2211 will be effective beginning FY01 due to the realignment from PEO(T) to PEO(W).

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

Modernized Hellfire (MH) is a joint service program in participation with the Army (Common Missile) and USMC (Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS)) in support of an approved Mission Need
Statements for future multi-role precision guided weapons. Navy MH efforts support joint System Definition and Risk Reduction efforts, Advanced Technology Demonstrations, modeling, simulation and hardware
component development efforts, requirements validation and Analysis of Alternatives, aircraft integration efforts, and the development of Milestone support documentation. The Army is the lead service for these efforts,
and Memorandums of Understanding establish the services responsibilities for the Concept Exploration phases. The MH efforts support the Department of the Navy's requirements for state-of-the-art weapon
capabilities to complement the next generation of aircraft and to best defeat the threats of the next generation battlefield.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

-(U) ($2.774) Formal validation of proposed requirements for the MH completed in Sep 2001. Efforts included rotary and fixed wing evaluation using Man-in-the-Loop modeling and simulation
facilities at the APEX Lab and at NAWC-WD. Effort established requirements for the draft MH Joint Operational Requirements Document (ORD). Participated with the Army in their studies related
to the Joint Common Missile (JCM). Continued evaluation of potential component technical solutions for future weapons via joint modeling and hardware development efforts. ($.924 Army
and $1.850 government in-house).

2. FY 2002 PLAN:

-(U) ($1.289) Initiate the formal AOA to recommend a material solution to satisfy the MNS for MH. Evaluate potential component technical solutions for future weapons via joint modeling
and hardware development efforts. Participate with the Army in their studies related to the JCM. Participate with the Army on development, integration, and testing efforts for the APKWS.
($.085 Army , $1.165 government in-house and $.039 for SBIR assessment.)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 17 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2211 JAWS

3. FY 2003 PLAN:

-(U) ($8.147) Explore component technical solutions for the Modernized Hellfire missile via modeling, simulation, systems integration
and hardware development efforts. Participate with the U.S. Army in their studies related to the Joint Common Missile.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 18 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2211 JAWS

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 2.324 1.300
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: 0.450 -0.011
(U) FY 2003 DoN Budget Submit: 2.774 1.289 8.147

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2001 net increase of $.450 million reflects an increase of $.553 million for a restoral of JAWS funds offset by a $.093 million SBIR assessment and a decrease of
$.010 for a reprioritization of requirements within the Navy. The FY 2002 decrease of $.011 is for an undistributed congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Related RDT&E: U. S. Army P.E. 0603313A PROJ D263 Future Missile Technology Insertion (FMTI). U.S. Army P.E. 0604329A Common Missile, U.S. Army P.E. 0604802A
Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System.

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not an ACAT program with no specific acquisition strategy.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable.

Related RDT&E: U. S. Army P.E. 0603313A PROJ D263 Future Missile Technology Insertion (FMTI).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 19 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N HARM Improvement A2211 JAWS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
APEX Lab MIPR AAMCOM, Huntsville, AL 0.450 0.739 12/00 0.085 12/01 6.124 12/02 7.398
Tech evaluation & Development MIPR TRADOC Norfolk, VA 0.185 12/00 0.185
APKWS MIPR 0.100 0.100

Subtotal Product Development 0.550 0.924 0.085 6.124 7.683

Remarks:

Engineering Technical Services C/TMM DCS Corp, Alexandria VA 0.110 0.215 01/01 0.160 01/02 0.421 01/03 0.906 0.906
Engineering Technical Services C/TMM Whitney, Bradley and Brown 0.150 0.363 01/01 0.240 01/02 0.753 0.753

Subtotal Support 0.260 0.578 0.400 0.421 1.659

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 20 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205601N A2211 JAWS
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Testing WX NAWC WD, China Lake, CA 1.190 11/00 0.722 11/01 1.566 11/02 Continuing Continuing

SBIR Assessment 0.039 0.039

Subtotal T&E 1.190 0.761 1.566 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Travel WX NAWC AD, Patuxent River 0.072 11/00 0.033 11/01 0.031 11/02 Continuing Continuing
Travel MIPR AAMCOM, Huntsville, AL 0.010 11/00 0.010 11/01 0.005 11/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Management 0.082 0.043 0.036 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 0.810 2.774 1.289 8.147 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 186

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 21 of 21)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N

PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Data Links

(U) COST: (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X1743 Link-16 Improvements 4,219 15,073 15,207 17,586 7,564 14,496 7,847 CONT CONT

X2126 ATDLS Integration 21,513 23,940 27,460 24,440 13,283 19,639 17,696 CONT CONT

TOTAL 25,732 39,013 42,667 42,026 20,847 34,135 25,543 CONT CONT

A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

(U) This program element (PE) develops and improves the Navy's tactical data link systems. It includes the Link-16 Improvements and Advanced Tactical Data Link Systems
(ATDLS) Integration Programs.

(U) Link-16 Improvements extends Link-16 technological improvements to existing and developing U.S. Navy data link systems, including Link-11 and Link-22. Near term Link-11
improvements include: Mobile Universal Link Translator System (MULTS) upgrade, Common Shipboard Data Terminal Set (CSDTS), Link-11 Baseline Freeze message standard
work, and the NATO Improved Link-11 (NILE) Project. Link-22 will pass TADIL-J data elements beyond the line of sight (HF) using a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA)
protocol and the improved Link-11 waveform. The Common Data Link Monitoring System (CDLMS) will be upgraded to Next Generation Command and Control Processor (C2P) to
accommodate the higher CPU speeds, update rate and memory capacity required for multi-TADIL processing functions. The Multi-TADIL Capability (MTC) is the initial phase of the
Next Generation C2P architecture. Next Generation C2P will be based on open system hardware and software architecture, providing a system capable of supporting critical data link
functions, including Link-22, Link-16 Joint Range Extension (JRE) and high throughput Link-16. These projects will allow more effective employment of fleet units by increasing
timeliness, accuracy, and content of tactical data transfer.

(U) The ATDLS Integration Program will integrate the Multifunctional Information Distribution System – Low Volume Terminal (MIDS-LVT) Link-16 terminal into U.S. Navy
platforms. This multinational (U.S., France, Germany, Italy, and Spain) cooperative development program was established to design, develop, and deliver low-volume lightweight
tactical information system terminals for U.S. and foreign fighter aircraft, helicopters, ships and ground sites. The terminals are designed as a pre-planned product improvement of the
Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Class II terminal. The goal of the MIDS-LVT program is to produce a terminal that is
R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 1 of 19
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N

PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Data Links

smaller, lighter, fully compatible with, and as capable as the JTIDS TDMA Class 2 terminals, but suitable for use in platforms that cannot accommodate the bulkier, heavier JTIDS
TDMA Class II equipment. This project includes the costs to integrate and test MIDS on the Navy’s F/A-18 and selected ship platforms. ATDLS Integration of the MIDS-LVT will
also provide selected U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps tactical aircraft, U.S. Navy ships, and U.S. Marine Corps ground units with crypto-secure, jam resistant, low-probability-of-
exploitation communication of tactical data and voice at a high data rate. It will have additional capabilities of common grid navigation and automatic relay inherent in the equipment
that will enable long-range communication and provide jam resistance. The system will be interoperable among all services and NATO/Allied users equipped with MIDS-LVT or
JTIDS Class II/IIA.

(U) ATDLS Integration Program also develops new and improved capabilities for Navy TADIL-J users. The Command and Control Processor is a software development effort that
provides an interface between the TADILs (Links 4A, 11, and 16) and major surface ship Command and Control Systems (Advanced Combat Direction System (ACDS) and AEGIS
Command and Decision (C&D)). The Common Data Link Management System is a pre-planned product improvement of the Command and Control Processor. The CDLMS will
provide translation between TADILs and isolate all tactical data link equipment, message standards and protocols from tactical information processors. This will provide a flexible
capability for rapidly exchanging tactical information using a single database for translating various link formats while remaining completely independent of communications equipment
and tactical data computing systems. Development of new capabilities in ATDLS includes Low Cost Integration and Dynamic Network Management. Low Cost Integration effort
develops a Link-16 transmit capability that will be provided to Navy aircraft platforms as a positive Combat ID method of identifying friendly units in the battlespace. Dynamic
Network Management will provide automatic reconfiguration of Link-16 networks that respond instantly to emergent warfighter requirements in the field.

(U) This program element also funds: (1) the development required to accommodate expanded Link-16 operational capabilities for additional warfare areas, (2) development of
automated network management aids, and (3) related systems engineering and contractor support efforts.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and
manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

(U) NOTE: Defense Emergency Relief Fund (DERF) funding of $5.164M will: (1) increase the scope of the Link-16 Improvement Program to develop new capabilities which are
pivotal in support of the Joint and Navy requirement in developing a coherent tactical picture; and (2) crossdeck Dual Net Multi-Frequency Link-11 (DNMFL) Prototypes for data
collection and analysis to design and develop DNMFL capability into the Common Data Link Management System (CDLMS).

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 2 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N

PROJECT TITLE: Tactical Data Links

B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

(U) Funding:
FY 2001: Section 8086 .7% Pro-Rata Reduction (-$183K), Government-Wide Rescission (-$57K), transfer to SBIR (-$366K), Federal Technology Transfer
(-$16K), and Department adjustments ($109K).
FY 2002: Section 8123: Management Reform Initiative (-$347K), and Section 8032: FFRDC (-$2K).

(U) Schedule: Link-22/Next Generation C2P IOC changed from 1Q/04 to 4Q/05 as a result of extending the design process development to align with combat system
requirements. Also, additional test and evaluation efforts are required to meet fleet interoperability requirements including the Combat System Interoperability Test
(CSIT), Battlegroup Interoperability Test (BGIT) and the link certification test.

MIDS DAB Milestone III (MS III) changed from 3Q/01 to 1Q/03 due to recent Navy decision to use LRIP terminals instead of EMD terminals for MOS IOT&E.

Completion of Performance Upgrades development efforts slipped from FY 01 to FY 02. OPTEVFOR’s requirement to test CDLMS software version 2.0 integrated
into AEGIS Baseline 6.1 has slipped from FY 01 to FY 02 due to slip in AEGIS Baseline 6.1 certification test. The slip was also due to the additional requirements to
develop CDLMS software version 3.0 to meet AEGIS Baseline 6 Phase 3 software requirements since Next Generation C2P IOC was delayed until FY 05.

(U) Technical: Not applicable.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 3 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X1743

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: Link-16 Improvements

(U) COST (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY2006 FY2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X1743 Link-16 Improvements 4,219 15,073 15,207 17,586 7,564 14,496 7,847 CONT CONT

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Link-16 Improvements extends Link-16 technological improvements to existing and developing U.S.
Navy data link systems, including Link-11 and Link-22. Near term Link-11 improvements include: Mobile Universal Link Translator System (MULTS) upgrade, Common Shipboard
Data Terminal Set (CSDTS), Link-11 Baseline Freeze message standard work, and the NATO Improved Link-11 (NILE) Project. Link-22 will pass TADIL-J data elements beyond the
line of sight (HF) using a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) protocol and the improved Link-11 waveform. The Common Data Link Monitoring System (CDLMS) will be
upgraded to Next Generation Command and Control Processor (C2P) to accommodate the higher CPU speeds, update rate and memory capacity required for multi-TADIL processing
functions. The Multi-TADIL Capability (MTC) is the initial phase of the Next Generation C2P architecture. Next Generation C2P will be based on open system hardware and software
architecture, providing a system capable of supporting critical data link functions, including Link-22, Link-16 Joint Range Extension (JRE) and High Throughput Link-16. These
projects will allow more effective employment of fleet units by increasing timeliness, accuracy, and content of tactical data transfer.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 4 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E: Project Justification (Project X1743)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X1743

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: Link-16 Improvements

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• (U) ($2,530) Continued to design and develop combined CDLMS/Link-22 program enhancements, which include design and development of Multi-TADIL
Capability (MTC) and Next Generation Command Control Processor (C2P). Initiated development of system specifications and performance baselines for Next
Generation C2P.

• (U) ($1,444) Initiated design definition and requirements for Link-22. Continued reviewing Link-22 message standards as part of the Link-22 design for Next
Generation C2P.

• (U) ($ 245) Completed design and development of Subphase 2 software for the NILE Reference System (NRS), design and development of NILE Subphase 2
software for the Multi-Link Test Tool.

2. (U) FY 2002 PLAN

• (U) ($7,833) Continue to develop CDLMS/Link-22 program enhancements, which include design and development of MTC and Next Generation C2P and
integration of the System Network Controller (SNC). Continue development of systems specifications and performance baselines for Next Generation C2P.
Complete MTC development. Conduct Next Generation C2P Software Systems Requirement Review (SRR) and Preliminary Design Review (PDR).

• (U) ($6,340) Continue Link-22 design requirements to support integration of Link-22 into Next Generation C2P. Initiate development of CSDTS changes to support
Link-22 System Processor Controller (SPC) waveforms.

• (U) ($ 900) Complete NILE Design and Development Subphase 2 software for the Multi-Link Test Tool (MLTT). Commence NILE In-Service Support Phase to
continue ongoing requirements to support the Systems Network Controller (SNC) and associated equipment, including performing activities to correct
deficiencies and to pursue improvements. Certify the Link-Level COMSEC (LLC) and MLTT software applications used in NILE architecture.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 5 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E: Project Justification (Project X1743)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X1743

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: Link-16 Improvements

3. (U) FY 2003 PLAN

• (U) ($7,842) Continue design and development of CDLMS/Link-22 program enhancements, which include design and development of Next Generation C2P and
integration with the System Network Controller. Complete system specifications and performance baselines for Next Generation C2P. Conduct Next Generation
C2P Critical Design Review.

• (U) ($6,436) Continue development of CSDTS changes to support Link-22 waveforms. Continue CSDTS software changes. Complete design of Link-22 and initiate
integration of Link-22 with Next Generation C2P.

• (U) ($ 929) Continue NILE In-Service Support Phase requirements to support the Systems Network Controller (SNC) and associated equipment, including
performing activities to correct deficiencies and to pursue improvements. Test LLC LRIP units to validate Link-22 design and development.

B. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in Thousands)

NUMBER FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY2007 TO TOTAL

TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

OPN Line 2614 ATDLS 18,169 9,876 7,608 16,710 2,648 13,729 12,016 CONT CONT
DERF R&D 5,164
OPN 3,416
O&M 3,920

Note: OPN includes procurement of hardware developed under Link-16 Improvements and ATDLS Integration Programs.

C. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY: NILE Reference System, Link-22 system development, CDLMS/Link-22 program enhancements and Next Generation C2P are utilizing existing
cost plus contracts.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 6 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E: Project Justification (Project X1743)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X1743

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: Link-16 Improvements

D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE
Program Next Gen C2P IOC
Milestones 4Q/05

Engineering Next Gen C2P SRR Interim Next Gen C2P

Milestones 1Q/02 S/W Certification Test
1Q/03

Next Gen C2P PDR Next Gen C2P CDR

4Q/02 3Q/03

T&E MLTT Certification Next Gen C2P

Milestones 3Q/02 S/W Acceptance Test
4Q/04

LLC Certification Next Gen C2P CSIT

4Q/02 1Q/05

Next Gen C2P

TECHEVAL/OPEVAL
3Q/05

Next Gen C2P Link Cert

3Q/05

Next Gen C2P

BGIT 4Q/05
Contract LLC LRIP
Milestones 2Q/03

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 7 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a RDT&E: Project Justification (Project X1743)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1)

Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
NATO Improved Link Eleven CPIF Logicon, 2,476 245 Various 100 01/02 2,821 2,821
Subphase 2 San Diego, CA
Link-22 Systems WX SPAWARSYSCEN 3,261 286 Various 2,236 Various 1,462 Various Cont Cont Cont
Engineering/Integration San Diego, CA
Link-22 Integration CPFF Logicon, 100 03/01 19 01/02 269 01/03 Cont 388 388
San Diego, CA
Link-22 Integration CPFF DRS, Wyndmoor, 538 Various 707 Various Cont Cont Cont
PA
Link-22 Network Design WX NCTSI, San Diego, 345 145 Various 430 Various 380 Various Cont Cont Cont
CA
C2P Improvements Various Various 2,377 2,377 2,377
Multi-TADIL Capability Various Various 855 95 05/01 950 950
(MTC)
Next Generation C2P CPFF APC, Austin, TX 1,325 905 Various 5,580 Various 6,455 Various Cont Cont Cont
Design/Dev
Next Generation C2P LLC WX SPAWARSYSCEN 1,477 Various 635 Various Cont Cont Cont
San Diego, CA
Next Generation C2P TDA CPFF APL/JHU, Laurel, 2,000 Various 2,649 Various 2,789 Various Cont Cont Cont
MD
NILE ISS Phase Various Logicon, 300 Various 400 Various Cont Cont Cont
San Diego, CA
NILE LLC Dev CPIF VIASAT, 500 12/01 543 12/02 Cont Cont Cont
San Diego, CA
Subtotal Product Development 10,639 3,776 13,829 13,640 Cont Cont Cont

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 8 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2)

Contract Performing Activity Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Cost to Target

Method & Location PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award Complete Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Cost Contract
Test and Evaluation WX SPAWARSYSCEN 272 175 12/00 753 Various 913 Various Cont Cont Cont
San Diego, CA

Subtotal T&E 272 175 753 913 Cont Cont Cont

Remarks

Engineering Support and Various Various 547 268 Various 491 Various 654 Various Cont Cont Cont
Travel

Subtotal Management 547 268 491 654 Cont Cont Cont

Remarks

Total Cost 11,458 4,219 15,073 15,207 Cont Cont Cont

Remarks :

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 9 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis for DERF (page 1)

Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & PYs FY0 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Cost 1 Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Cost
Link-22 Systems WX SPAWARSYSCEN 800 Various 800 800
Engineering/Integration San Diego, CA
Next Generation C2P Systems Various Various 450 Various 450 450
Engineering
Next Generation C2P CPFF APC, Austin, TX 1,500 Various 1,500 1,500
Design/Dev
Next Generation C2P TDA CPFF APL/JHU, Laurel, 750 Various 750 750
MD
Subtotal Product Development 3,500 3,500 3,500

Subtotal T&E 0 0
Remarks
Engineering Support and 0 0 0
Travel

Subtotal Management 0 0 0
Remarks
Total Cost 3,500 3,500 3,500
Remarks : DERF funding not included in PB 03 totals

(U) COST (Dollars in Thousands)

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 10 of 19
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

X2126 ATDLS Integration 21,513 23,940 27,460 24,440 13,283 19,639 17,696 CONT CONT

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The ATDLS Integration program will integrate the Multifunctional Information Distribution System –
Low Volume Terminal (MIDS-LVT) Link-16 terminal into U.S. Navy platforms. This multinational (U.S., France, Germany, Italy, and Spain) cooperative development program was
established to design, develop, and deliver low-volume lightweight tactical information system terminals for U.S. and foreign fighter aircraft, helicopters, ships and ground sites. The
terminals are designed as a Pre-Planned Product Improvement (P3I) of the Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) Class II
terminal. The goal of the MIDS-LVT program is to produce a terminal that is smaller, lighter, fully compatible with, and as capable as the JTIDS TDMA Class II terminals, but suitable
for use in platforms that cannot accommodate the bulkier, heavier JTIDS TDMA Class II equipment. This project includes the costs to integrate and test MIDS on the Navy’s F/A-18
and selected ship platforms. ATDLS Integration of the MIDS-LVT will also provide selected U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps tactical aircraft, U.S. Navy ships, and U.S. Marine
Corps ground units with crypto-secure, jam resistant, low-probability-of-exploitation communication of tactical data and voice at a high data rate. It will have additional capabilities of
common grid navigation and automatic relay inherent in the equipment that will enable long-range communication and provide jam resistance. The system will be interoperable among
all services and NATO/Allied users equipped with MIDS-LVT or JTIDS Class II/IIA.

(U) ATDLS Improvement program also develops new and improved capabilities for Navy TADIL-J users. The Command and Control Processor (C2P) is a software development effort
that provides an interface between the TADILs (Link 4A, 11, and 16) and major surface ship Command and Control Systems (Advanced Combat Direction System (ACDS) and AEGIS
C&D). Common Data Link Management System (CDLMS) is a Pre-planned Product Improvement (P3I) of the C2P. The CDLMS will provide translation between TADILs
and isolate all tactical data link equipment, message standards and protocols from tactical information processors. This will provide a flexible capability for rapidly exchanging tactical
information using a single database for translating various link formats while remaining completely independent of communications equipment and tactical data computing systems.
Development of new capabilities in ATDLS includes Low Cost Integration and Dynamic Network Management. Low Cost Integration effort develops a Link-16 transmit capability that
will be provided to Navy aircraft platforms as a positive Combat ID method of identifying friendly units in the battlespace. Dynamic Network Management will provide automatic
reconfiguration of Link-16 networks that respond instantly to emergent warfighter requirements in the field.

(U) This project also funds: (1) the development required to accommodate expanded Link-16 operational capabilities for additional warfare areas, (2) development of automated
network management aids, and (3) related systems engineering and contractor support efforts.

(U) Additional terminal development costs are funded in program element 0604771D.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 11 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration
(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• (U) ($13,611) Continued F/A-18 MIDS integration; software development; aircraft modifications and testing; and interoperability certification testing.

• (U) ($ 1,999) Completed MIDS on Ship development testing and operational assessment.

• (U) ($ 1,643) Continued TADIL-J System Engineering to include investigating future capabilities and enhancements and ensuring Naval upgrades are
interoperable with Joint U.S. and allied forces such as joint range extension, time slot reallocation, advanced network planning aids, design tools, link
monitoring management tools and enhanced throughput.

• (U) ($ 4,260) Continued Performance Upgrades including C2P Model 5 improvements, Common Data Link Management System (CDLMS) development,
and Satellite-TADIL-J development.

2. (U) FY 2002 PLAN

• (U) ($17,640) Complete F/A-18 MIDS integration software, flight, development and TECHEVAL.

• (U) ($ 2,851) Integrate MIDS on Ship with Model 5 Combat System and conduct testing.

• (U) ($ 1,655) Continue TADIL-J System Engineering to include investigating future capabilities and enhancements and ensuring Naval upgrades are
interoperable with Joint U.S. and allied forces such as joint range extension, dynamic network management and time critical strike applications.

• (U) ($ 1,794) Complete Performance Upgrades including C2P Model 5 improvements, Common Data Link Management System (CDLMS) development,
and Satellite-TADIL-J development.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 12 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

3. (U) FY 2003 PLAN

• (U) ($17,232) Complete F/A-18 MIDS OPEVAL. Conduct F/A-18 system interoperability certification testing.

• (U) ($ 2,491) Complete MIDS on Ship development and operational testing.

• (U) ($ 2,441) Continue TADIL-J Systems Engineering to include investigating future capabilities and enhancements and ensuring Naval upgrades are interoperable
with Joint U.S. and allied forces such as joint range extension, dynamic network management, time critical strike, and support integration concepts for
additional aircraft.

• (U) ($ 2,110) Commence Low Cost Integration development to provide common host and terminal software to support lower cost Link-16 capability on Navy
aircraft systems. Supports Combat ID, situational awareness, and joint data network capability for Navy air platforms not currently integration with Link-16.

• (U) ($ 3,186) Commence Dynamic Network Management development to provide automatic reconfiguration of Link-16 networks and dynamic reallocation of
network capacity to meet emergent warfighter requirements in the field as operations evolve.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 13 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration
B. (U) OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: (Dollars in Thousands)

NUMBER FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL

TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

APN LINE
LI 052500 F/A-18 47,234 32,373 48,577 48,740 51,294 43,667 49,862 CONT CONT

RDT&E,DA 16,100 16,572 16,842 17,974 19,030 19,416 19,822 CONT CONT

OPN LI 2614 ATDLS 18,169 9,876 7,608 16,710 2,648 13,729 12,016 CONT CONT

DERF R&D 5,164

OPN 3,416
O&M 3,920

Note: OPN includes procurement of hardware developed under Link-16 Improvements and ATDLS Integration Programs.

SCN - Funding for ATDLS hardware is not separately identified in the SCN budget exhibits.

RELATED RDT&E:

PE 0604771D/P771 - Link-16: Link-16 systems engineering support.

PE 0604771D/P773 - MIDS: MIDS-LVT terminal development.

C. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY: F/A-18 MIDS aircraft integration is utilizing cost plus fixed fee contracts on an R&D Basic Ordering Agreement with Boeing. MIDS
integration and testing, TADIL-J systems engineering, and performance upgrades development are utilizing existing cost plus contracts.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 14 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration
D. (U) SCHEDULE PROFILE
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

Program LRIP 2 4Q/01 LRIP 3 3Q/02 DAB MS III 1Q/03

Milestones MIDS IOC 3Q/03

Engineering
Milestones

T&E F/A-18 DT-IIA-6 2Q/01

Milestones F/A-18 OT-IIA-3 1Q/01
F/A-18 DT Assist 4Q/01*

F/A-18 DT-IIA-7 1Q/02 F/A-18 OPEVAL 1Q/03

F/A-18 TECHEVAL 3Q/02 F/A-18 Interoperability Cert 1Q/03

F/A-18 FOT&E 2Q/04

Ship DT-IIB-2 2Q/01

Ship OT-IIB-1A OA 4Q/01 Ship DT-IIB-3 1Q/02 Ship TECHEVAL 2Q/03
Ship DT-II-4 3Q/02 Ship OPEVAL 4Q/03

Contract
Milestones

*Test requirements are performed in DT Assist event vice OT-IIA-4 event.

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 15 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification (Project X2126)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1)

APPROPRIATION: RDT&E,N PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N Tactical Data Links
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7
Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
Method Activity & PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
F/A-18 Integration PD NAVAIRSYSCOM 121,701 9,767 Various 11,819 Various 8,358 Various 17,542 169,187 169,187
PAX River, MD
TADIL-J System Engineering WX SPAWARSYSCEN 25,082 1,166 Various 1,193 Various 1,224 Various Cont Cont Cont
San Diego,CA
TADIL-J System Engineering Various Various 3,315 285 Various 293 Various 1,028 Various Cont Cont Cont
MIDS on Ship CPIF BAE Systems 11,488 936 Various 1,593 Various 500 12/03 14,517 14,517
Wayne, NJ (DLS)
MIDS on Ship Various Various 43,078 512 Various 650 Various 900 Various 45,140 45,140
Performance Upgrades WX SPAWARSYSCEN 9,157 1,996 Various 1,530 Various 12,683 12,683
San Diego, CA
Performance Upgrades Various Various 4,783 4,783 4,783
Air Defense System Integrator CPFF APC, Austin, TX 2,059 2,059 2,059
Dual Net Link-11 WX Various 1,866 1,866 1,866
Korean Air Defense Sys Impr CPFF JHU/APL, Laurel, 900 900 900
MD
DNMFL Prototypes Various Various 1,766 Various 86 10/01 1,852 1,852
Low Cost Integration TBD TBD 1,946 Various Cont Cont Cont
Dynamic Network TBD TBD 2,940 Various Cont Cont Cont
Management
Subtotal Product Dev 223,429 16,428 17,164 16,896 Cont Cont Cont
Remarks:

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 16 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2)

APPROPRIATION: RDT&E,N PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N Tactical Data Links
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7
Cost Categories Contract Performing Activity Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
Method & Location PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost to Total Value of
& Type Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Subtotal Support
Remarks

Test and Evaluation Various Various 3,975 3,975

MIDS F/A-18 T&E WX SPAWARSYSCEN 5,479 1,609 Various 1,607 Various 2,967 Various Cont Cont Cont
San Diego, CA
MIDS F/A-18 T&E Various Various 6,406 643 Various 2,400 Various 4,575 Various Cont Cont Cont
MIDS on Ship T&E PD OPTEVFOR, 42 Various 50 Various 500 592
Norfolk, VA Various
MIDS on Ship T&E WX SPAWARSYSCEN 665 275 Various 280 Various 400 Various 1,620 1,620
San Diego, CA
MIDS Test Assets SS/CPAF MIDSCO 6,594 6,594 6,594
/IF Fairfield, NJ
Subtotal T&E 23,119 2,569 4,337 8,442 Cont Cont Cont
Remarks

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 17 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2)

APPROPRIATION: RDT&E,N PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N Tactical Data Links
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7
Cost Categories Contract Performing Activity Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target
Method & Location PYs FY01 Award FY02 Award FY03 Award Cost to Total Value of
& Type Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Engineering Support and Various Various 2,479 2,516 Various 2,439 Various 2,122 Various Cont Cont Cont
Travel
Subtotal Management 2,479 2,516 2,439 2,122 Cont Cont Cont
Remarks
Total Cost 249,027 21,513 23,940 27,460 Cont Cont Cont

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 18 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N PROJECT COST ANALYSIS DATE: FEBRUARY 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205604N PROJECT NUMBER: X2126

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: Tactical Data Links PROJECT TITLE: ATDLS Integration

Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis for DERF (page 1)

Contract Performing Total FY01 FY02 FY03 Target

Method Activity & PYs FY0 Award FY02 Award FY 03 Award Cost To Total Value of
Cost Categories & Type Location Cost 1 Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost Contract
Cost
DNMFL Link 11 Prototype WX SPAWARSYSCEN 1,025 Various 1,025 1,025
Installation San Diego, CA
DNMFL Link 11 Prototype CPFF JHU/APL, Laurel, 389 Various 389 389
Systems Engineering MD
DNMFL Link 11 Prototype WX NSWC Port 250 Various 250 250
(MK-70 Switchboard) Hueneme Division
Subtotal Product Development 1,664 1,664 1,664
0 0 0
Subtotal T&E
Remarks
Engineering Support and 0 0 0
Travel

Subtotal Management 0 0 0
Remarks
Total Cost 1,664 1,664 1,664
Remarks : DERF funding not included in PB 03 totals

R-1 Shopping List - Item No 187 19 of 19

UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA 7 Surface ASW Combat System Integration/ 0205620N

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Total PE Cost 30.008 27.869 24.424 16.609 14.337 6.964 11.708 CONT. CONT.
ASW Combat Systems Integration/
Q0896 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.288 5.444 CONT. CONT.
Surface ASW System Improvements/
Q1916 30.008 27.869 24.424 16.609 14.337 5.676 6.264 CONT. CONT.

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The objective of this Program Element (PE) is to significantly improve existing AN/SQQ-89(V) and Surface Ship Sonar System capabilities. It will improve
AN/SQQ-89(V) Measures of Performance (MOP) by enhancing detection, tracking, classification, data processing and display capabilities, and increasing acoustic sensor frequency bandwidth. This PE will
take advantage of Acoustic Rapid COTS Insertion (ARCI) type initiatives and the AN/SQQ-89(V) open system architecture to develop and integrate the Multi-Function Towed Array (MFTA) with active sonar
bistatics (Echo Tracker Classifier - ETC) and torpedo defense capabilities into the AN/SQQ-89(V) as a backfit program for CG47 (as part of the Cruiser Conversion program) and DDG51 class ships (AN/SQQ-
89A(V)15). Via the Peer Review Process (PRP), the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 system architecture will support technology refresh, maximize software portability, and support interoperability with multiple AEGIS
baselines.

B. Program Change Summary:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003
FY 2002 President's Budget: 29.314 28.119
Appropriated Value: 29.585 28.119

Adjustments to FY 2001/2002
Appropriated Value/ FY 2002
President's Budget: 0.423 -0.250

FY 2003 OSD/OMB Budget Submit: 30.008 27.869 24.424

Funding: FY 2001 changes include a net increase for ASN(RDA) Below Threshold Reprogrammings (+1.324) and decreases for SBIR (-0.630) and Congressional reductions (-0.271). FY 2002 decrease for
Federally Funded Research Centers (FFRDC)(-0.002) and Sec. 8123, Management Reform Initiatives (-0.248).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 1 of 188-7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat System Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvements/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Project Cost 30.008 27.869 24.424 16.609 14.337 5.676 6.264 CONT. CONT.

RDT&E Articles Qty

A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The Surface ASW System Improvements project will support essential performance enhancements on AN/SQQ-89(V) and Surface Ship Sonar
Systems. This project will develop and refine active classification and display upgrades to support implementation in both the AN/SQQ-89(V) hull subsystem and the MFTA. This Project will integrate the
MFTA, completed in Project V0896, with active sonar bistatics (ETC) and torpedo defense capablities into the AN/SQQ-89(V) as a backfit program on CG47 (as part of the Cruiser Conversion program) and
DDG51 class ships (AN/SQQ-89A(V)15). Via the PRP, the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 system architecture will support technology refresh, maximize software portability, and support interoperability with multiple
AEGIS baselines. Finally, this Project will develop the AN/SQQ-89(V) design and interface with the Light Airborne Multi-Purpose System (LAMPS) Mk III Blk II system.

PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. (U) FY 2001 Accomplishments:

($3.237) Completed active sonar bistatic processing (Echo Tracker Classifier (ETC)) to support implementation with the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15.

($1.153) Completed torpedo Detection, Classification and Localization (DCL) software to support implementation with the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15.

($22.104) Continued integration of MFTA, active sonar bistatic processing (ETC), and torpedo DCL software into the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15.

($1.100) Began integration of LAMPS Mk III Blk II KuBand into the AN/SQQ-89(V).

($0.179) Completed analysis of the Computer Aided Dead Reckoning Tracer (CADRT) TECHEVAL and OT-IIA at-sea test of an AN/SQQ-89(V)6 system with active adjunct processing and improved
contact management.

($0.335) Coordinated and conducted MFTA sea test.

($1.900) Completed transition of Environmentally Adaptive (EA) algorithms and active sonar parameter control into the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188- 2 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat System Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvements/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N

2. (U) FY 2002 Plan:

($8.500) Enhance AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 system architecture to support technology refresh, maximize software portability, and modify external interfaces to support interoperability with multiple AEGIS
baselines.

($17.294) Continue integration of MFTA, active sonar bistatic processing (ETC), and torpedo DCL software into the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15.

($0.275) Coordinate and conduct MFTA sea test.

($1.100) Continue the integration of the LAMPS Mk III Blk II KuBand into the AN/SQQ-89(V).

($0.700) Coordinate and conduct developmental test DT-IIIAP of the improved AN/SQQ-89(V)6 Torpedo Alertment Upgrade.

3. (U) FY 2003 Plan:

($0.335) Coordinate and conduct MFTA sea test.

($20.954) Contract for delivery of AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Engineering Development Model (EDM), provide associated integration support, and coordinate installation efforts.

($1.000) Begin the development of improved torpedo detection algorithms to be incorporated into the Torpedo Recognition and Alertment Functional Segment (TRAFS).

($0.874) Continue the integration of the LAMPS Mk III Blk II KuBand into the AN/SQQ-89(V).

($0.650) Coordinate and conduct operational test OT-IIIJ of the improved AN/SQQ-89(V)6 Torpedo Alertment Upgrade.

($0.350) Coordinate and conduct developmental test DT-IIIA and operational test OT-IIIA of an AN/SQQ-89(V)14 system with improved contact management capabilities (CADRT).

($0.261) Provide AN/SQQ-89(V) performance data analysis, independent verification and validation, and modeling and simulation using MOP and Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) methods.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 3 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat System Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvements/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N
B. Other Program Funding Summary:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY2007 To Complete Total Cost

OPN Budget Line Item 213600/5

14.1 16.4 24.2 31.2 21.3 21.3 23.9 CONT. CONT.

Related RDT&E: N/A

C. Acquisition Strategy: Development work in this project is performed primarily by:

- Advanced Acoustic Concepts (AAC), NY - SBIR Phase III contract for common acoustic procesor
- Applied Hydro-Acoustics Research (AHA), MD - SBIR Phase III contract for common acoustic processor and beamformer processing for MFTA
- Digital System Resources (DSR), VA - SBIR Phase III contract for common acoustic processor
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL), MD - Design, development and integration of MFTA, Torpedo Detection Classification and Localization (TDCL) improvements, and
emerging
active sonar technologies into the AN/SQQ-89(V)
- Lockheed Martin, NY - Incumbent AN/SQQ-89(V) Design Agent. This contract was awarded competitively and will extend through FY 2002
- Prime Contractor TBD - AN/SQQ-89(V) Design Agent. This contract to be competitively awarded in FY 2002
- Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI - AN/SQQ-89(V) Technical Direction Agent
- Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA - AN/SQQ-89(V) Technical Direction Agent

Future Plan:

Award new competitive AN/SQQ-89(V) contract in FY 2002.

Complete AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 EDM in FY 2003 (RDT&E PE 0205620N).

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 4 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat System Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvements/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N
D. Schedule Profile
D. Schedule Profile

FY 2001 FY2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007

Program Begin LAMPS Complete AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Complete

Milestones Mk III Blk II AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 EDM Installed LAMPS
Integration EDM Mk III Blk II
Integration

Engineering 2Q Integrated 3Q Integrated 1Q Integrated

Milestones MFTA MFTA MFTA
Sea Test Sea Test Sea Test

T&E 3Q (V)6 CADRT 4Q Improved 2Q Improved 3Q AN/SQQ- 2Q AN/SQQ-

Milestones OT-IIA TAU DT-IIIAP TAU OT-IIIJ 89A(V)15 89A(V)15
Sea Test Sea Test Sea Test DT Sea Test OT Sea Test
2Q (V)14 CADRT
DT-IIIA
Sea Test

4Q (V)14 CADRT
OT-IIIA
Sea Test

Contract Award new competitive

Milestones AN/SQQ-89(V)
contract
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 5 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat Systems Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvement V1916/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPFF AAC, NY 0.000 0.911 01/01 2.158 12/01 0.374 11/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPFF AHA, MD 0.379 1.247 03/01 0.745 11/01 0.200 11/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPFF DSR, VA 0.489 1.312 12/00 1.875 01/02 2.500 11/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPFF JHU/APL, MD 1.953 1.780 02/01 2.986 01/02 0.500 12/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPAF Lockheed Martin, NY 14.165 14.514 11/00 6.117 11/01 0.000 34.796 34.796
Primary H/W & S/W Development C/CPAF Prime Contractor TBD 2.126 03/02 12.462 11/02 TBD TBD TBD
Primary H/W & S/W Development WR NSWC/Dahlgren, VA 5.509 1.271 11/00 0.556 12/01 1.725 11/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development WR NUWC/Newport, RI 19.602 3.205 11/00 2.615 11/01 3.661 11/02 CONT. CONT.
Primary H/W & S/W Development Var. Var. 19.094 4.521 Var. 7.138 Var. 1.020 Var. CONT. CONT.
Common Systems Engineering Var. Var. 0.580 0.000 0.580

Subtotal Product Development 61.771 28.761 26.316 22.442 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:
Budgeted for award fees ($M): 1.116 in FY01 (Lockheed Martin, NY) , 0.764 in FY02 (0.584 - Lockheed Martin, NY and 0.180 - Prime Contractor TBD) and 0.253 in FY03 (Prime Contractor TBD). Lockheed Martin's performance
has been excellent, earning close to 100% of possible award fee for the most recent award fee periods.

Studies, Analysis, & Evaluations Var. Var. 0.900 0.000 0.900

Engineering & Technical Services Var. Var. 1.500 0.000 1.500

Subtotal Support 2.400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.400

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 6 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY Surface ASW Combat Systems Integration/ Surface ASW System Improvement V1916/ Q1916
RDT&E, N/ BA 7 0205620N
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Development & Operational T&E Var. Var. 4.260 0.179 Var. 0.700 Var. 1.000 Var. CONT. CONT.
Miscellaneous T&E Var. Var. 2.447 0.261 Var. CONT. CONT.

Subtotal T&E 6.707 0.179 0.700 1.261 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

Program Management Support Var. Var. 4.815 0.918 Var. 0.703 Var. 0.571 Var. CONT. CONT.
Travel Var. Var. 0.854 0.150 Var. 0.150 Var. 0.150 Var. CONT. CONT.

Subtotal Management 5.669 1.068 0.853 0.721 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

Total Cost 76.547 30.008 27.869 24.424 CONT. CONT.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 188 - 7 of 188 - 7

UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

COST ($ in Millions) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Total Cost

Total PE Cost 15.156 16.979 22.052 23.073 30.182 30.685 31.296 CONT. CONT.

MK48 ADCAP/F0366 15.156 16.979 22.052 23.073 30.182 30.685 31.296 CONT. CONT.

Quantity of RDT&E Articles

A. (U) Mission Description and Budget Item Justification: The MK 48 ADCAP (ADvanced CAPability) torpedo R&D program focuses on two specific areas near term: Torpedo
Advanced Processor Builds (APBs) and wideband sonar capability. The Chief of Naval Operations continues to stress shallow water (less than 600 feet) as a critical operating
area to counter third world diesel electric submarines. Torpedo testing in shallow water has demonstrated that in-service ADCAP has less than full capability in this difficult
environment. However, this testing, in conjunction with laboratory simulation efforts, has shown that significant performance improvements can be made by implementing
changes to weapon tactics and software algorithms. Development, implementation and testing of these changes is being accomplished under the Torpedo APB program.

(U) Countermeasure (CM) sophistication and availability on the open market directly affects ADCAP kill proficiency and its ability to counter rapidly evolving threats. The focus
of the MK 48 ADCAP torpedo R&D program for FY01 and out has shifted from being primarily concentrated on Software Block Upgrade efforts towards coordinated hardware
upgrades, rapid Commercial-Off-the-Shelf insertion, and Torpedo APBs to rapidly upgrade the ADCAP to counter evolving threats and maintain robust performance. The
Common Broadband Advanced Sonar System (CBASS) program will develop and field a wideband sonar capable of identifying CMs and discriminating them from the target.
CBASS will develop 22 test articles (2 test vehicles and 20 Engineering Development Models (EDMs)). CBASS met Milestone II requirements on 6 March 1998 and received
MDA approval to proceed into EMD. Full rate production and IOC are scheduled for FY06. The intent of the CBASS program is to achieve improvements in shallow water
torpedo performance over current (MK48 Mod 5) capability.

(U) The introduction of the Torpedo Technology Insertion in FY04 will provide for incremental torpedo improvements and upgrades (including the development and test of New
Technology Concepts from the R&D community (6.2/6.3) and contractor Independent Research and Development (IR&D)). This approach will incorporate developmental
testing of the Future Naval Capability (FNC) transitioning technologies for ADCAP upgrades and help to provide the foundation for Next Generation Torpedoes. These efforts
will continue torpedo development investment at a lower cost and shorter term than traditional torpedo programs.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($4.222) Torpedo Advanced Processor Build continued in order to address Software Block Upgrade IV OPEVAL results. Efforts included software coding, modeling
and simulation of software releases (including development and validation of models) and engineering tests in water for evaluation of proposed maintenance release.
Conducted validation of safety features for submarine crew safety.

- (U) ($0.100) Provided for COMOPTEVFOR trusted agent test support and data analysis.

- (U) ($10.834) Completed CBASS design development and fabrication of test vehicles. Continued development of advanced wideband algorithms, signal processing, and
tactical software. Conducted Preliminary and Critical Design Reviews. Continued in-water testing to support algorithm development and initial software builds.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($4.499) Torpedo Advanced Processor Build efforts continue in order to address fleet identified performance priorities for MK48 ADCAP MODS. Efforts include
software coding, modeling and simulation of software releases (including development and validation of models) and engineering tests in water for evaluation of proposed
releases. Conduct validation of safety features for submarine crew safety.

- (U) ($0.100) Provide for COMOPTEVFOR trusted agent test analysis and model validation support.

- (U) ($12.380) Initiate fabrication of CBASS EDM hardware. Continue development of advanced wideband algorithms, signal processing, and tactical software. Continue
integration of CBASS prototype hardware and software components and test equipment. Continue in-water testing to support algorithm development and initial software
builds.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($9.198) Torpedo Advanced Processor Build efforts continue in order to address fleet identified performance priorities for MK48 ADCAP MODS and to address
broadband sonar improvements. Efforts include software coding, modeling and simulation of software releases (including development and validation of models) and
engineering tests in water for evaluation of proposed releases. Conduct Follow-On Test and Evaluation of MK48 ADCAP MODS per TEMP. Conduct validation of safety
features for submarine crew safety.

- (U) ($0.200) Provide for COMOPTEVFOR trusted agent test analysis and model validation support.

- (U) ($8.654) Integration and delivery of CBASS EDM hardware. Continue development of advanced wideband algorithms, signal processing, and tactical software.
Continue integration of CBASS prototype hardware and software components and test equipment. Continue in-water testing to support algorithm development and initial
software builds.

- (U) ($4.000) Conduct developmental testing of MK48 ADCAP Mod 6 in cold water, littoral environments. Efforts include torpedo preparations, modeling and simulation
predictions, post-run analysis, and preparations for required submarine hit-shot certification analysis prior to exercise.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

B. (U) Program Change Summary: FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003

(U) FY 2002 President’s Budget: 15.707 17.130
(U) Appropriated Value: 15.853 17.130
(U) Adjustments to FY 2001/2002
Appropriated Value/FY 2002
President's Budget: -0.697 -0.151
(U) FY 2003 PRES Budget Submit: 15.156 16.979 22.052

Funding:
FY01: Net reduction of -$0.697M is due to -$0.496M USN directed undistributed reduction and -$0.201M SBIR reduction.
FY02: Reduction of -$0.151 is due to USN directed undistributed reduction.
FY03: N/A

Schedule: The CBASS program in-water test program has been extended one year to coincide with EDM fabrication and software development. This results in a one
year extension of developmental testing, technical and operational testing. Operational Evaluation concludes in FY06.

Technical: Due to technical design complexities and results from systems requirements review analysis, additional engineering efforts were required to support hardware
and software development prior to commencement of in-water developmental testing with prototypes.

C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in millions)

To
FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Complete
MK48 ADCAP MODS (WPN/PE0204284N/BA-3/P-1 Item 322500) 42.882 42.031 62.124 68.324 91.941 89.012 77.298 CONT.
Sub. Tactical Warfare Systems (RDT&E/PE0603562N/BA-4/S1739) 4.172 9.323 11.601 6.763 6.818 6.918 7.033

Advanced Submarine Systems (RDT&E/PE0603561N/BA4) 128.391 124.142 107.389 114.129 111.190 115.037 116.191

D. (U) Acquisition Strategy: CBASS EMD contract was competitively awarded among qualified ADCAP producers.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:
February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N

E. Schedule Profile:

PROGRAM EFFORTS FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07

BLK IV ADCAP Mods

OPEVAL DT/FOT&E ADCAP Performance Upgrades based on Fleet Priorities
Torpedo Advanced Processor Builds

Engineering Tests in Support of CBASS

Algorithm and Softw are Development DT/OT OPEVAL
CBASS Development

SDR PDR CDR MSIII

Developmental Testing
Torpedo Technology Insertion

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E, N/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N MK48 ADCAP/F0366
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Primary Hardware Development WR NUWC Newport, RI CONT. 0.485 10/00 0.184 10/01 0.069 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Primary Hardware Development C,CPFF ARL/PSU State College, PA CONT. 0.000 0.000 0.000 CONT. CONT. N/A
Primary Hardware Development C,CPFF Northrop Grumman 13.458 8.151 11/00 5.089 10/01 3.788 10/02 0.307 30.793 30.793
Ancillary Hardware Development 0.000
Systems Engineering WR NUWC Newport, RI CONT. 1.498 10/00 4.195 10/01 5.058 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Licenses 0.000
Tooling 0.000
GFE 0.000
Award Fees 0.000
Subtotal Product Development CONT. 10.134 9.468 8.915 CONT. CONT.

Remarks: Total Cost and Target Value of Contract represents contract Latest Revised Estimate based on completed alpha pricing negotiations and CBASS hardware technical requirements.

Development Support Equipment 0.000

Software Development WR NUWC Newport, RI CONT. 1.559 10/00 3.393 10/01 4.033 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Software Development C,CPFF ARL/PSU State College, PA CONT. 0.150 11/00 0.350 10/01 0.450 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Training Development 0.000
Integrated Logistics Support 0.000

Configuration Management
Technical Data 0.000
GFE 0.000
Subtotal Support CONT. 1.709 3.743 4.483 0.000 CONT.

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, page 7 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NAME AND NUMBER
RDT&E, N/BA-7 MK48 ADCAP/0205632N MK48 ADCAP/F0366
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
(Tailor to WBS, or System/Item Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
Requirements) & Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Test & Evaluation WR NUWC Newport, RI CONT. 1.156 10/00 1.706 10/01 5.168 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Developmental Various Various CONT. 0.231 11/00 0.100 10/01 0.200 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Modeling & Simulation WR NUWC Newport, RI CONT. 0.995 10/00 0.908 10/01 1.731 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
Modeling & Simulation Various Various CONT. 0.619 11/00 0.650 10/01 0.900 10/02 CONT. CONT. N/A
GFE 0.000
Subtotal T&E CONT. 3.001 3.364 7.999 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support 0.000

Government Engineering Support 0.000
Program Management Support Various Various CONT. 0.272 MISC. 0.274 MISC. 0.500 MISC. CONT. CONT. N/A
Travel 0.040 0.045 0.045 CONT. CONT. N/A
Labor (Research Personnel) 0.000
Overhead 0.000 0.085 0.110 CONT. CONT. N/A
Subtotal Management CONT. 0.312 0.404 0.655 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

Total Cost CONT. 15.156 16.979 22.052 CONT. CONT.

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 189

Exhibit R-3, Project Cost Analysis
(Exhibit R-3, page 8 of 8)
UNCLASSIFIED
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-7 0205633N, AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Total PE Cost 48.339 44.929 40.915 48.447 38.297 41.943 42.630 Continuing Continuing

W0601 Common Ground Equipment 2.796 3.328 3.444 3.488 2.991 3.027 3.072 Continuing Continuing

W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) 7.845 6.682 6.757 6.740 6.707 6.805 6.914 Continuing Continuing

W1041 Aircraft Equip Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP) 0.735 0.622 0.620 0.631 0.534 0.540 0.546 Continuing Continuing

W1355 Aircraft Engine CIP 36.963 30.431 30.094 37.588 28.065 31.571 32.098 Continuing Continuing

W9109 Aircraft Age Exploration Model Development 2.478 2.478

W9110 Nano-Composite Hard-Coat For Aircraft Coatings 1.388 1.388

Quantity of RDT&E Articles Not Applicable

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

Common Ground Equipment is a Naval Aviation Project to apply new technology to common support equipment necessary to support multiple aircraft. Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) is a
standardized Automated Test Equipment (ATE) with computer assisted, multi-function capabilities to support the maintenance of aircraft subsystems and missiles. Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement
Program (AERMIP) is the only Navy program that provides engineering support for in-service out-of-production aircraft equipment, and provides increased readiness at reduced operational and support cost. The Aircraft
Engine Component Improvement Program (CIP) develops reliability and maintainability (R&M) and safety enhancements for in-service Navy aircraft engines, transmissions, propellers, starters, auxiliary power units,
electrical generating systems, fuel systems , fuels, and lubricants. Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings is evaluation of erosion coatings for propulsion systems.

(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY:

This program is funded under OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT because it encompasses engineering and manufacturing development for upgrade of existing, operational systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 1 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2.796 3.328 3.444 3.488 2.991 3.027 3.072 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

This project introduces effective, efficient fleet support equipment through the application of new technology, thereby improving fleet supportability and aircraft readiness.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($.389) Continued Advance Boresight Equipment (ABE) program.

- (U) ($.721) Continued Next Generation Munitions Handler (NGMH) program.

- (U) ($1.686) Completed Joint Engine Test Initiave (JETI) program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 2 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($.377) Continue ABE program.

- (U) ($.500) Continue NGMH program.

- (U) ($2.350) Initiate Shaft Engine Test Instrumentation program.

- (U) ($.101) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:

- (U) ($2.194) Continue NGMH program.

- (U) ($1.250) Complete Shaft Engine Test Instrumentation program.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 3 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 3.224 3.358
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -0.428 -0.030
(U) FY 2003 President Budget Submit: 2.796 3.328 3.444

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION

(U) Funding:

The FY 2001 net decrease of $.428 million is for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy. The FY 2002 decrease of $.030 million is for an undistributed congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Advanced Boresight Equipment (ABE)-FY2001, MSIII-FY2002, MSIII , Prior to MSIII, testing extended due to merging AH-1Z requirements.
Next Generation Munitions Handler (NGMH)-12/05 slipped to 12/06-Unforseen development initiatives between aircraft platforms and new weapons interface.
Joint Engine Test Initiative (JETI)-12/01 slipped to 03/02 due to unforseen additional required testing.

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

APN 070500 Ground Support Eq 102.127 126.542 164.441 176.962 184.293 180.190 169.183 Continuing
Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 4 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: * This is a non-ACAT program. Field activities propose tentative RDT&E projects. Internal panel merits and selects projects. Field activities develop projects and submit
results. Operational Advisory Group (OAG) process selects projects to transition to procurement (APN-7).

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

Advanced Boresight Equipment 12/02 MS III
Next Generation Munitions Handler 12/06 (MSIII)
Joint Engine Test Initiative 03/02 (MS III)

(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones

Joint Engine Test Initiative 4/01 (DT)
Shaft Engine Test Instrumentation 2/03 (DT)

(U) Contract Milestones

Joint Engine Test Initiative

Advanced Boresight Equipment 01/02 (Contract Award)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 5 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware Development Various Various 11.955 0.050 10/00 0.800 01/02 1.718 01/03 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Product Development 11.955 0.050 0.800 1.718 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Miscellaneous Support Various Various 2.012 01/01 2.127 01/02 1.726 12/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Support 2.012 2.127 1.726 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 6 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0601 Common Ground Equipment
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Miscellaneous Test & Evaluation Various Various 0.734 01/01 0.300 01/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal T&E 0.734 0.300 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

SBIR Assessment 0.101 0.101

Subtotal Management 0.101 0.101

Remarks:

Total Cost 11.955 2.796 3.328 3.444 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 7 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Year Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 7.845 6.682 6.757 6.740 6.707 6.805 6.914 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The Consolidated Automated Support System (CASS) project designs, and develops modular constructed automated test equipment with computer-assisted, multi-functional capability based, standardized
hardware, and software elements. CASS responds to Fleet Commanders' expressed requirements to correct serious deficiencies in existing automatic test equipment. Program objectives are: (1) increase material
readiness; (2) reduce life cycle costs through standarization; (3) improve tester sustainability at depot, and intermediate maintenance levels; (4) reduce proliferation of unique test equipment, and (5) provide test capability
for existing and future avionics/electronics systems.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACOMPLISHMENTS:

- (U) ($7.000) Continued development of instrument control upgrades and virtual instruments (RTCASS).

- (U) ($ .845) Continued CASS station upgrades.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 8 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System

3. FY 2002 PLANS:
- (U) ($4.747) Initiate development of a Synthetic Instrument Package.
- (U) ($1.733) Continue CASS station upgrades.
- (U) ($ .202) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

4. FY 2003 PLANS:
- (U) ($3.829) Continue development of a Synthetic Instrument Package.
- (U) ($2.928) Continue CASS station upgrades.

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 7.890 6.741
(U) Adjustments from the FY202 President's Budget: -0.045 -0.059
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 7.845 6.682 6.757

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION

(U) Funding:

The FY2001 net decrease of $ .045 million consist of a decrease of $.229 million for a Small Business Innovative Research Assessment (SBIR) and a decrease of $.057
million for reprioritization of requirements within the Navy offset by a $.241 million increase for continued CASS upgrades. The FY 2002 net decrease of $.059
million consist of a decrease of $.060 million for an undistributed congressional reduction offset by an increase of $.001 million for continued CASS upgrades.

(U) Schedule: Not Applicable

(U) Technical: Not Applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Line Item No. & Name FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 To Complete

APN 070500 CASS 120.054 105.145 90.588 93.381 76.972 90.111 91.852 Continuing
Related RDT&E: Not Applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 9 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: The stragtegy for Parts Obsolescence is a combined effort with the contractor, any changes to present strategy will add additional risks to achieving a continuous
production schedule, and will cause technical uncertainty. For new technologies we will have competitive studies to ascertain the market technology; which, will result in maximum information for minimum
expenditure.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE:

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 TO COMPLETE

(U) Program Milestones

(U) Engineering Milestones

(U) T&E Milestones

(U) Contract Milestones

RTCASS 4/01 (Contract Award)
Synthetic Instrument Package 3/02 (Contract Award) 3/03 (Contract Award)

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 10 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware Development C/FFP LMC 12.900 7.000 04/01 0.608 04/02 0.000 20.508 20.508
Hardware Development Various Various 0.845 1.125 01/02 2.928 01/03 Continuing Continuing
Hardware Development Various Various 4.747 03/02 3.829 03/03 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Product Development 12.900 7.845 6.480 6.757 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Subtotal Support

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 11 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W0852 Consolidated Automated Support System
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

SBIR Assessment 0.202 0.202

Subtotal Management 0.202 0.202

Remarks:

Total Cost 12.900 7.845 6.682 6.757 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 12 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1041 Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP)
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 0.735 0.622 0.620 0.631 0.534 0.540 0.546 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
AERMIP is the only Navy program which provides Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) engineering support specifically for in-service, out-of-production aircraft equipment. AERMIP increases
readiness through Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) and safety improvements to existing systems and equipment installed in Naval aircraft. It also provides a transition vehicle to deploy Total Ownership Cost (TOC)
reduction initiatives through flight-test support and Fleet Test & Evaluation. It meets affordable readiness objectives by providing a cost-effective solution to obsolescence problems encountered when service lives are
extended. AERMIP promotes commonality and standardization across aircraft platform lines and among the services through extension of application and use of non-developmental items. AERMIP also decreases life
cycle costs through reduced operational and support costs. AERMIP facilitates the Operational, Safety and Improvement Program by applying proven low-risk solutions to current fleet problems. AERMIP also funds high
priority flight testing which is not associated with any acquisition or development program under the Flight Test General (FTG) task.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

- ($.735) Continued Total Ownership Cost (TOC) reduction corrosion initiatives. Completed the improved hydraulic seals investigation and validation project. Initiated the aircraft canopy crazing
mitigation project. Investigated high value return on investment candidates and transition of TOC reduction initiatives.

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- ($.603) Complete the Corrosion Preventative Compound initiative by developing a best practices plan to be implemented by all Naval Aircraft. Initiate the Common Instrument Program. Investigate
high value pay back return on investment candidates and transition of TOC reduction initiatives.

- ($.019) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 13 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1041 Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program (AERMIP)
3. FY 2003 PLANS:

- ($.620) Continue the Common Instrument Program. Complete the aircraft canopy crazing mitigation project. Initiate the Corrosion Sensor initiative that will work in
conjunction with the previously completed Corrosion Preventative Compound initiative to determine if corrosion sensors can be utilized in development of a condition based maintenance
philosophy for corrosion preventative maintenance. Investigate high value pay back return on investment candidates and transition of TOC reduction initiatives.

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 0.739 0.628
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -0.004 -0.006
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 0.735 0.622 0.620

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY2001 decrease of $.004 consists of a $.002 million decrease for Small Business Innovative Research assessment and a $.002 million decrease for reprioritization of
requirements within the Navy. The FY2002 decrease of $.006 is for an undistributed Congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable

(U) Technical: Not applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not applicable

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: This is a non-ACAT program with no specific acquisition strategies.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 14 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 36.963 30.431 30.094 37.588 28.065 31.571 32.098 Continuing Continuing

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program (CIP) provides the only source of critical design and development engineering support to resolve safety, reliability and maintainability deficiencies of in-
service Navy aircraft propulsion systems. The highest priority issues CIP addresses concern safety-of-flight deficiencies which account for approximately 80% of CIP efforts. The program also corrects service-revealed
deficiencies, improves Operational Readiness (OR) and Reliability and Maintainability (R&M), and reduces platform Life Cycle Cost (LCC). Budgets are allocated across platform-specific teams and multi-platform product
support teams based upon long term strategies to achieve safety and affordable readiness goals; the R-3 exhibit details annual portions of those long-term plans. CIP tasks have reduced the rate of in-flight aborts, safety
incidents, non-mission capable rates, scheduled and unscheduled engine removals, maintenance work hours, and overall cost of ownership. This is accomplished through the maintenance and validation of specification
performance, testing to qualify engineering changes, verifying life limits, and improving the inherent reliability of the propulsion system as an integral part of Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) initiatives. Historically,
the missions, tactics, and environmental exposure of military aircraft systems change to meet new threats or operational demands, and often result in unforeseen problems, which if not corrected, can cause critical
safety/readiness degradation, such as those experienced during DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM operations due to sand erosion. In addition, new problems arise through actual use during deployment of the aircraft.
Development programs, while geared to resolve as many problems as possible before deployment, cannot duplicate actual operations or account for the vast array of environmental and usage variables, particularly when
aircraft missions vary from those the aircraft was designed to perform. Therefore, it has been found that CIP can provide an immediate engineering response to these flight-critical problems and accelerated engine testing
can avoid potential problems. CIP starts after development and Navy acceptance of the first production article and addresses usage and life problems not covered by warranties. CIP addresses engines, transmissions,
propellers, starters, auxiliary power units, electrical generating systems, and fuel and lubricant systems. CIP efforts continue over the system’s life, gradually decreasing to a minimum level sufficient to maintain the
reliability, and decrease the operating costs, of older inventory. CIP is a highly leveraged and cooperative tri-service program with Foreign Military Sales participation.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) ($32.753) Platform-specific efforts:

T56 engine (P-3, E-2, C-2, C-130) Began and implemented the Engine Monitory System version 7.0 upgrade. Maintained safety margins by investigating turbine coatings and developed new designs, continued
propeller integration efforts with potential propeller designs, performed engine hot section corrosion and fatigue analysis, and continued bearing improvements.
E-2/C-2/C-130 Began incorporation of improved blade heaters. Began development of improved propeller control system.
S-3 Completed new fan blade design. Completed safety related fan High Pressure Compressor (HPC) life limit analysis. Completed Main Fuel Control (MFC) durability investigation. Performed analyses on
commercial hardware incorporation analyses. Continued validation and implementation on recommended part life changes.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 15 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CONT):

F/A-18C/D Identified obsolescence problems, continued efforts on bushing, aft cooling plate, low pressure turbine nozzle and bolted dome combustor redesign efforts. Continued life management issues including the
fleet leader program, engine analysis studies, and improved analytical models, analyzed engine performance data and updated mission analysis.
Mature Aircraft Addressed the top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; implemented efforts on the J52 engine (EA-6B) ASMET test, performed annual maintenance awareness brief and annual P-408A major
engine inspection program. Continued to study and implement solutions to aging aircraft issues and future obsolescence problems. Began redesign of diffuser case for increased life.
H-2/H-60 Completed integration of the improved Digital Electronic Control Unit (DECU) to the H-60 fleet. Completed implementation of I-level screening techniques for the DECU and Hydro-Mechanical units,
continued the Advanced Helicopter Transmission Lubricant Program, extended transmission component lives, increased readiness by reducing corrosion, continued Mission Profile Data Collection and Dynamic
Component Life Limit efforts. Continued time on wing and Mean Time Between Removals (MTBR) cost drivers initiatives including compressor durability, Titanium Nitrates (TiN) coating and three-stage turbine.
AV-8B Completed design efforts associated with the exhaust duct cracking, and failure of the Low Pressure Compressor (LPC) and HPT blade cracking and shaft sulfidation. Completed Shell Deer Park fuel burner rig
testing to eliminate all risk associated with fuel incompatibility in the F402 engines. Addressed top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; safety of flight issues, engine removal drivers, and mission failure drivers, assess
life management program issues for engine components.
H-53/H-46/H-3 Started Bleed Valve redesign. Continued efforts on the top cause for engine removals; completed transition of program to reliability-centered maintenance; implemented goals at depot level to improve
compressor performance and engine power, resolved oil consumption and leakage problems, and improved on wing times.
H-1 Addressed top safety concerns as ranked by the OAG and System Safety Working Group, continued to update Navy maintenance manuals, continued to improve time-between-overhaul and reduced impact of
high-time parts. Continued improvement program to the Bleed Valve, T5 Harness, Gas Generator Case Diffuser Inlet, and Compressor Stub Shaft. Initiated development of environmentally friendly repairs such as High
Velocity OXY fuel coatings to replace chrome and nickel plate repairs.
T-45 Continued investigation of engine vibration problems to resolve safety issue. Addressed platform safety, increase predicted part life confidence, provided mission profile updates and life cycle management.
Continued Critical Parts Life management to ensure no overfly of parts, continued life management to double most expensive parts life, and addressed obsolescence issues.
F-14B/D Completed final life limit updates for F110-GE-400 engine. Continued High Pressure Compressor Spool life improve redesign. Addressed extension of component life and the reduction of maintenance
hours. Continued improvements to propulsion system safety through an active life management program for critical rotating components, reduced the engine Non-recoverable In-Flight Shutdown Rate by 75% by 2003,
reduced the propulsion system related mission abort rate by 50% by 2003.

(U) ($4.210) Multi-Platform Product Support Teams Continued projects designed to provide common support to multiple platforms in the areas of improved drive systems, secondary
power and mechanical systems; improved tools for performance analysis, modeling and simulation, diagnostics, engine reliability assessment, and structural integrity; improved products and processes for fuels, lubricants,
and refueling equipment; improved blade and vane repair processes and life cycle support; and improved electrical system product support and battery systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 16 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

(U) ($24.611) Platform-specific efforts:

T56 engine (P-3, E-2, C-2, C-130) Continue the implementation of the Engine Monitory System version 7.0 upgrade. Maintain safety margins by investigating turbine coatings and develop new designs, continue
propeller integration efforts with potential propeller designs, perform engine hot section corrosion and fatigue analysis, and continue bearing improvements.
E-2/C-2/C-130 Continue incorporation of improved blade heaters. Continue development of improved propeller control system.
S-3 Initiate High Pressure Compressor (HPC) life limit implementation. Continue validation and implementation of High Pressure Turbine (HPT), Low Pressure Turbine (LPT), and Fan critical part life limit changes.
Initiate the development of Combustion Chamber Frame (CCF) and HPT physics based thermal models. Complete the development of LPT physics based thermal models. Collect engine parameter flight data required to
perform updated engine mission analysis. Initiate the development of improved Eddy Current (EC) inspection techniques for small holes and specific features. Analyze and correlate HPC EC inspection requirements to
critical part Fracture Mechanics (FM) capabilities. Investigate propulsion and power system obsolescence. Conduct engine component and propulsion and power electrical system reliability/maintainability analysis.
Conduct commercial critical part hardware commonality analysis.
Mature Aircraft Address the top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; implement efforts on the J52 engine (EA-6B) ASMET test, perform annual maintenance awareness brief and annual P-408A major engine
inspection program. Continue to study and implement solutions to aging aircraft issues and future obsolescence problems. Continue redesign of diffuser case for increased life.
H-2/H-60 Continue the Advanced Helicopter Transmission Lubricant Program, extend transmission component lives, increase readiness by reducing corrosion, continue Mission Profile Data Collection and Dynamic
Component Life Limit efforts. Continue time on wing and Mean Time Between Removals (MTBR) cost drivers initiatives including compressor durability, Titanium Nitrates (TiN) coating and three-stage turbine.
AV-8B Address top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; safety of flight issues, engine removal and mission failure drivers, assess life management program issues for engine components. Projects will include but
not be limited to: ASMET testing, support of a Fleet Leader Program, Analytical Condition Insepction (ACI), Engine Life Management Program (ELMP) execution and design fixes for any service revealed deficiencies.
H-53/H-46/H-3 Complete bleed valve redesign. Continue efforts on the top cause for engine removals; improve on wing times; address top safety concerns as ranked by the Operational Advisory Group (OAG);
continue reliability-centered maintenance program; improve compressor blade retention design; and initiate development of corrosion resistant bearing designs.
H-1 Address top safety concerns as ranked by the OAG and System Safety Working Group, continue to update Navy maintenance manuals, continue to improve time-between-overhaul and reduce impact of high-time
parts (T700 and T400); address Blisk, Rear Shaft, Spacer & Tierod Life Update (T700), Continue development of environmentally friendly repairs such as High Velocity OXY fuel coatings to replace chrome and nickel
plate repairs; and initiate development of Durability Project (T700-401/-401C), N5 Blades w/ tip cap & Nozzles, T700 TiN Coating (Test Articles, Corrosion/Erosion/Full Sand Engine Testing), T700 Diagnostics Life Mgt
Performance Evaluation (IMD), T700 Diagnostics (Performance Evaluation), Durability Project (T700-401/-401C), T700 TiN Coating (Pending Pass/Fail... Incorp TiN), EPAMs Mission Update to 4BN, T700 Diagnostics
(Performance Evaluation), T400 Improved Compressor Turbine Stub Shaft, T400 Improved Gas Generator Case Diffuser Inlet, T400 Improved Compressor Coating, T400Life Management, Study T400 Parts
Obsolescence.
F-14B/D Address obsolescence of electrical components. Continue high pressure turbine redesign efforts. Address extension of component life and the reduction of maintenance hours. Continue improvements to
propulsion system safety through an active life management program for critical rotating components. Continue efforts to reduce the engine non-recoverable in-flight shutdown Rate and propulsion system related mission
abort rate.

(U) ($4.899) Multi-Platform Product Support Teams Continue projects designed to provide common support to multiple platforms in the areas of improved drive systems, secondary power and mechanical systems;
improved tools for performance analysis, modeling and simulation, diagnostics, engine reliability assessment, and structural integrity; improved products and processes for fuels, lubricants, and refueling equipment;
improved blade and vane repair processes and life cycle support; and improved electrical system product support and battery systems.

(U) ($.921) Portion of extramural program reserved for Small Business Innovation Research assessment in accordance with 15 USC 638.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 17 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program
3. FY 2003 PLANS:

(U) ($25.239) Platform-specific efforts:

T56 engine (P-3, E-2, C-2, C-130) Continue the implementation of the Engine Monitory System version 7.0 upgrade. Maintain safety margins by investigating turbine coatings and develop new designs, continue
propeller integration efforts with potential propeller designs, perform engine hot section corrosion and fatigue analysis, and continue bearing improvements.
E-2/C-2/C-130 Continue incorporation of improved blade heaters. Continue development of improved propeller control system.
S-3 Perform reliability/maintainability analysis on engine components, propulsion and power electrical system addressing top readiness degraders and AVDLR cost drivers. Evaluate commercial hardware for TF34-
400B applicability. Continue the development of Combustion Chamber Frame (CCF). Perform obsolence analysis on propulsion and power systems. Implement High Pressure Compressor field management plan.
Continue validation and implementation of High Pressure Turbine (HPT), Low Pressure Turbine (LPT), and fan critical part field management plans. Using LPT physics based thermal models, continue the HPT physics
based thermal models. Collect and analyze engine parameter flight data to update engine mission profiles. Develop improved Eddy Current (EC) inspection probes and techniques to minimize process time. Analyze and
correlate HPC EC inspection requirements to critical part Fracture Mechanics (FM) capabilities.
Mature Aircraft Address the top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; continue efforts on the J52 engine (EA-6B) ASMET test, perform annual maintenance awareness brief and annual P-408A major engine
inspection program. Continue to study and implement solutions to aging aircraft issues and future obsolescence problems. Continue redesign of components for increased life.
H-2/H-60 Continue the Advanced Helicopter Transmission Lubricant Program, extend transmission component lives, increase readiness by reducing corrosion, continue Mission Profile Data Collection and Dynamic
Component Life Limit efforts. Continue time on wing and Mean Time Between Removals (MTBR) cost drivers initiatives including compressor durability, Titanium Nitrates (TiN) coating and three-stage turbine.
AV-8B Address top readiness degraders and AVDLR costs; safety of flight issues, engine removal and mission failure drivers, assess life management program issues for engine components. Projects will include but
not be limited to: ASMET testing, support of a Fleet Leader Program, Analytical Condition Insepction (ACI), Engine Life Management Program (ELMP) execution and design fixes for any service revealed deficiencies.
H-53/H-46/H-3 Continue efforts on the top cause for engine removals based on the latest metric and trending data available; improve on wing times; address top safety concerns as ranked by the Operational Advisory
Group (OAG) and System Working Group (SSWG); continue reliability-centered maintenance program; improve compressor blade retention design; and continue development of corrosion resistant bearing designs.
Initiate programs to improve the mean time between engine removal based upon continued implementation of reliability center maintenance initiatives. Conduct life management analyses to resolve critical rotating
component issues based upon engine structural integrity assessments and the master life management plan.
H-1 Address top safety concerns as ranked by the OAG and System Safety Working Group, continue to update Navy maintenance manuals, continue to improve time-between-overhaul and reduce impact of high-time
parts (T700 and T400); address Blisk, Rear Shaft, Spacer & Tierod Life Update (T700), Continue development of environmentally friendly repairs such as High Velocity OXY fuel coatings to replace chrome and nickel plate
repairs; and initiate development of Durability Project (T700-401/-401C), N5 Blades w/ tip cap & Nozzles, T700 TiN Coating (Test Articles, Corrosion/Erosion/Full Sand Engine Testing), T700 Diagnostics Life Mgt
Performance Evaluation (IMD), T700 Diagnostics (Performance Evaluation), Durability Project (T700-401/-401C), T700 TiN Coating (Pending Pass/Fail... Incorp TiN), EPAMs Mission Update to 4BN, T700 Diagnostics
(Performance Evaluation), T400 Improved Compressor Turbine Stub Shaft, T400 Improved Gas Generator Case Diffuser Inlet, T400 Improved Compressor Coating, T400Life Management, Study T400 Parts
Obsolescence.
F-14B/D Address obsolescence of electrical components. Complete high pressure turbine redesign efforts. Address extension of component life and the reduction of maintenance hours. Continue improvements to
propulsion system safety through an active life management program for critical rotating components. Continue efforts to reduce the engine non-recoverable in-flight shutdown Rate and propulsion system related mission
abort rate.

(U) ($4.855) Multi-Platform Product Support Teams Continue projects designed to provide common support to multiple platforms in the areas of improved drive systems, secondary power and mechanical systems;
improved tools for performance analysis, modeling and simulation, diagnostics, engine reliability assessment, and structural integrity; improved products and processes for fuels, lubricants, and refueling equipment;
improved blade and vane repair processes and life cycle support; and improved electrical system product support and battery systems.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 18 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 38.622 30.702
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: -1.659 -0.271
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 36.963 30.431 30.094

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 2001 decrease of $1.659 million reflects a decrease of $.786 million for Small Business Innovative Research assessment and a decrease of $.873 million for
reprioritization of requirements within the Navy.
FY 2002 decease of $.271 million reflects an undistributed congressional reduction.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable

(U) Technical: Not applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

PE 0203752A (Aircraft Engine CIP Army)

PE 0207268F (Aircraft Engine CIP Air Force)
PE 0602236N (Turbine Engine Improvement, TOC, FNC)
PE 0603236N (Turbine Engine Improvement, TOC, FNC)
PE 0602114N (UAV Propulsion Autonomous Operations FNC)
PE 0603114N (UAV Propulsion Autonomous Operations FNC)

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not applicable

(U) E. Schedule Pofile : Not applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 19 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
F110 Engine Program* SS/CPAF GE - OHIO 12.786 1.890 12/00 2.100 12/01 2.100 12/02 18.876 18.876
F402 Engine Program SS/CPFF ROLLS ROYCE- UK 19.195 2.487 12/00 3.320 12/01 3.320 12/02 28.322 28.322
F404/T58/T64 Engine Programs SS/CPFF GE - MASS 20.873 7.813 04/01 1.672 10/01 1.672 10/02 32.030 32.030
J52 Engine Program SS/CPFF P&W - FLORIDA 6.406 2.500 12/00 2.600 12/01 2.600 12/02 14.106 14.106
T56 Engine Program SS/CPFF INDIANA 3.575 1.700 02/01 2.005 02/02 2.005 02/03 9.285 9.285
F405 Engine Program SS/CPAF ROLLS ROYCE- UK 4.544 1.940 12/00 6.484 6.484
F/A 18 E/F Engine Program SS/CPFF GE- MASS 0.664 0.664 0.664
T700 Engine Program SS/CPFF GE - MASS 3.092 1.050 11/00 1.255 01/02 1.255 01/03 6.652 6.652
TF34 Engine Program SS/CPFF GE - MASS 3.840 0.600 11/00 0.775 11/01 0.775 11/02 5.990 5.990
V22 Engine Program SS/CPFF GE- MASS 1.000 1.000 1.000
Props Program SS/CPFF HAM SUNSTRAND - CONN 3.395 1.000 12/00 1.155 12/01 1.155 12/02 6.705 6.705
Contracts under 1.0M aggregate VARIOUS VARIOUS 10.659 1.107 10/00 1.200 10/01 1.200 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Lab Field Activity (1.0M or more) WX NAWCAD-PAX 86.306 12.316 10/00 10.878 10/01 11.462 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Other in-house support (1.0M or less) VARIOUS VARIOUS 13.740 0.750 10/00 0.840 10/01 0.840 10/02 Continuing Continuing
GFP Fuel Increment MIPR KAFB - TEXAS 3.695 0.300 10/00 0.360 10/01 0.360 10/02 Continuing Continuing
Award Fees** SS/CPAF 0.610 0.450 0.450 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Product Development 193.770 36.063 28.610 29.194 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:
* F110 (F14 B/D) AF contract has a ten year period of performance.

**Award fees for F110 (.210), F402 (.240) and F405 (.160) F405 award fee in FY01 only.

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 20 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvmeents W1355 Aircraft Engine Component Improvement Program
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Other in-house less than 1.0M VARIOUS VARIOUS 3.146 0.650 10/00 0.650 10/01 0.650 10/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal Support 3.146 0.650 0.650 0.650 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Other in-house less than 1.0M VARIOUS VARIOUS 2.394 0.150 10/00 0.150 10/01 0.150 10/02 Continuing Continuing

Subtotal T&E 2.394 0.150 0.150 0.150 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Other in house less than 1.0M VARIOUS VARIOUS 0.397 0.100 10/00 0.100 10/01 0.100 10/02 Continuing Continuing
SBIR Assessment 0.921 0.921

Subtotal Management 0.397 0.100 1.021 0.100 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

Total Cost 199.707 36.963 30.431 30.094 Continuing Continuing

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 21 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements W9109, Aircraft Aging Exploration Model Development
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 2.478 2.478

RDT&E Articles Qty Not Applicable

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

Aircraft AGE Exploration Model for Naval aircraft platforms. The model will use existing Naval aircraft data to establish connections between age and reliability, maintainability, and readiness and will provide the Navy with
a valuable tool for understanding, predicting, and communicating impacts of decisions to extend aircraft service lives and for mitigating risks associated with these decisions.

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

- (U) ($ 0.300) Analyze age impacts on multiple aircraft and aircraft systems to determine contributing factors to changes in reliability, maintainability and readiness.

- (U) ($ 1.808) Develop a computer model integrating with existing data systems to predict trends and impacts on aircraft reliability, maintainability and readiness as aircraft and systems age.

- (U) ($ 0.370) Perform failure analysis and model verification testing

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 22 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements W9109, Aircraft Aging Exploration Model Development

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget: 0
(U) Adjustments from the President's Budget: 2.478
(U) FY 2003 President's Budget Submit: 2.478

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: The FY 2002 increase of $2.478 million reflects a congressional add for Aircraft AGE Exploration Model Development

(U) Schedule: Not applicable

(U) Technical: Not applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Aircraft Equipment Reliability/Maintainability Improvement Program, W1041

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: This is a non-ACAT program with no specific acquisition strategies.

(U) E. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 23 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements W9109, Aircraft Aging Exploration Model Development
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract

Subtotal Product Development

Software Development SS/CPFF ManTech 1.708 03/02 1.708 1.708

Technical Data SS/CPFF ManTech 0.010 03/02 0.010 0.010
GFE SS/CPFF ManTech 0.050 02/02 0.050 0.050

Subtotal Support 1.768 1.768

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 24 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) February 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N, Aviation Improvements W9109, Aircraft Aging Exploration Model Development
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Developmental Test & Evaluation
Operational Test & Evaluation

Subtotal T&E

Remarks:

Contractor Engineering Support SS/CPFF ManTech 0.220 02/02 0.220 0.220

Government Engineering Support WX NAWCAD 0.320 01/02 0.320
Program Management Support WX NAWCAD 0.160 01/02 0.160
Travel WX NAWCAD 0.010 01/02 0.010

Subtotal Management 0.710 0.710

Remarks:

Total Cost 2.478 2.478

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 25 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W9110 Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings
Prior Total
COST ($ in Millions) Years Cost FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Cost to Complete Program

Project Cost 1.388 1.388

RDT&E Articles Qty

(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:

The Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft coatings program will be used to investigate the use of Devitrified Nano-Composite Steel (DNC) as a potentially superior erosion coating for the T700 engine. The
development of erosion coatings is critical to minimize the harsh erosive effects of the sandy environments encountered by our forces in Southwest Asia and other theaters of operations. Erosion effects are one of the
primary drivers for T700 compressor stator-rotor assembly repair and replacement. The successful application of DNC may significantly improve T700 Operational Readiness (OR) and Reliability and Maintainability
(R&M), and reduce platform Life Cycle Cost (LCC).

(U) PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND PLANS:

1. FY 2001 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:

(U) Not applicable

2. FY 2002 PLANS:

(U) ($1.388):
* Acquire 6 sets of: compressor stator-rotor assemblies, gas generator assemblies, miscellaneous hardware to build-up test engines.
* Coat and restore leading edges of compressor airfoils.
* Coat gas engerator turbine blades
* Build engines to 1.0 specifications.
* Operate two engines at the NAWCAD PAX Helicopter Transmission Test Facility for a transmission superfinish test and a simultaneous High Cycle Fatigue Test.
* Perform Sand Ingestion Testing on four engines; each with a select hardware configuration.

3. FY 2003 PLANS:

(U) Not applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 26 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification DATE:

FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W9110 Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings

(U) B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003

(U) FY 2002 President's Budget : 0.000 0.000 0.000
0
(U) Adjustments from the FY2002 President's Budget: 1.388
(U) Fy 2003 President's Budget Submit: 1.388

CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:

(U) Funding: FY 2002 increase of $1.388 million reflects Congressional Add for Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings.

(U) Schedule: Not applicable

(U) Technical: Not applicable

(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:

Not applicable

(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not applicable

(U) E. Schedule Pofile : Not applicable

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 27 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 1) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvements W9110 Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Hardware/Engineering Support SS/CPFF GENERAL ELECTRIC 0.300 03/02 0.300 0.300
Contracts under 1.0M aggregate VARIOUS VARIOUS 0.723 03/02 0.723 0.723
Lab Field Activity (1.0M or less) WX VARIOUS 0.065 03/02 0.065

Subtotal Product Development 1.088 1.088

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 28 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED

CLASSIFICATION:

DATE:
Exhibit R-3 Cost Analysis (page 2) FEBRUARY 2002
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-7 0205633N Aviation Improvmeents W9110 Nano-Composite Hard-Coat for Aircraft Coatings
Cost Categories Contract Performing Total FY 01 FY 02 FY 03
Method Activity & PY s FY 01 Award FY 02 Award FY 03 Award Cost to Total Target Value
& Type Location Cost Cost Date Cost Date Cost Date Complete Cost of Contract
Other in-house less than 1.0M VARIOUS VARIOUS 0.250 03/02 0.250

Subtotal Support 0.250 0.250

Remarks:

Admin/Test Coordination SS/CPFF Concurrent Technol Corp 0.050 03/02 0.050 0.050

Subtotal T&E 0.050 0.050 0.050

Remarks:

Subtotal Management

Remarks:

Total Cost 1.338 1.338 1.338

Remarks:

R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 190

Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification

UNCLASSIFIED (Exhibit R-2, page 29 of 29)
 UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2003 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET DATE: February 2002

BUDGET ACTIVITY: 7 PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0205658N

PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: NAVAL FLEET/FORCE TECHNOLOGY
INNOVATION OFFICE

(U) (COST): (Dollars in Thousands)

PROJECT
NUMBER & FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 TO TOTAL
TITLE ACTUAL ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE COMPLETE PROGRAM

R0834 Laboratory Fleet Support

*7,018 4,901 4,801 4,923 4,770 4,865 4,964 CONT. CONT.

R2371 Lash Hyperspectral

*9,690 4,262 - - - - - - 49,000

R2701 Lash Study

*8,721 5,055 - - - - - - 14,770

R9111 Littoral/Mine Countermeasures Rapid Response

- 4,262 - - - - - - 4,262
* 25,429 18,480 4,801 4,923 4,770 4,865 4,964 CONT. CONT.

* Funding was executed in PE 0603238N.

A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of the Naval Fleet/Force Technology Innovation
Office (NFFTIO) is to ensure that the Fleet/Force (F/F) helps shape the Department of the Navy (DoN) investment in Science
and Technology (S&T), develop teaming relationships to rapidly demonstrate and transition technology, support development
of technology-based capability options for naval forces, and enable warfighting innovations based on technical and
conceptual possibilities. This is accomplished through proactive connectivity and collaboration between DoN S&T and Joint,
Navy, and Marine Corps commands worldwide. The program accomplishes this through several methods. It provides on-the-spot
Naval Research Science Advisors (NRSAs) Joint, Navy, and Marine Corps operational and strategic planning commands
worldwide. In addition, NFFTIO facilitates and disseminates Command Capability Issues (CCIs) provided by the F/F Commanders
to the Director of Navy Test and Evaluation and Technology Requirements (OP