Scribd
Upload
253 views7 pages

Case Study Assignment

The document is a group project case study comparing PBB Group Berhad and Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd. It includes an introduction with the group members' names and justification for selecting the two companies. There is a table of contents outlining the report structure. The trend analysis section examines key financial ratios for liquidity, asset utilization, leverage, and profitability for PBB Group Berhad over 2016-2020. Graphs show trends in the company's current and quick ratios, turnover ratios, debt ratios, and profit margins.

Uploaded by

Ayu Dita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
253 views7 pages

Case Study Assignment

The document is a group project case study comparing PBB Group Berhad and Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd. It includes an introduction with the group members' names and justification for selecting the two companies. There is a table of contents outlining the report structure. The trend analysis section examines key financial ratios for liquidity, asset utilization, leverage, and profitability for PBB Group Berhad over 2016-2020. Graphs show trends in the company's current and quick ratios, turnover ratios, debt ratios, and profit margins.

Uploaded by

Ayu Dita
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Faculty of Business Management

Bachelor of Human Resource Management

FIN420 Financial Management

Group Project:
Case Study
PBB Group Berhad & Fraser and Neave Holdings Bhd

Prepared By:

Name Matrix No. Class


Illiyin Atiqah Binti Abdul Razak 2021119341 BA2431B
Riskia Naralita Sari 2021717617 BA2431B
Nur Raudhah binti Jefri 2021100815 BA2431B
Dita Ayu Nirmala 2021172113 BA2431B
Lu’luil Cindy Primadhani 2021160131 BA2431B

Prepared For:
Madam Nik Rozila binti

Submission Date:
28 May 2021
TABLE OF CONTENT PAGES

1.0 Justification of the selected companies 1

2.0 Background of companies


2.1 Core Activities 2
2.2 Strength and Weaknesses
2.3 Financial History

3.0 Trend Analysis


3.1 PBB Group Berhad
3.2 Fraser and Neave Holdings Berhad

4.0 Comparative Analysis

5.0

6.0
Justification of the selected companies

We choose the PBB Group Berhad and Frase and Neave company because both companies are public
listed companies that produce consumer products that are in the same industry. We can see that in
every consumer and products industry, their operational and safety procedures are similar and it is
safe to assume that the operational cost of the company might have some similarities to be compared
with. Besides, by comparing both companies, we can analyse which of the companies have better
financial management based on their company’s annual financial report.
Trend Analysis

PPB Group Berhad

Liquidity Ratios
3.5

2.5

1.5

0.5

0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Current Ratio Quick Ratio

Current Quick Ratio


Ratio
2016 3.28 2.55
2017 2.66 1.97
2018 2.69 1.92
2019 2.9 2.16
2020 3.21 2.5
Quick Ratios
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Account Receivable Turnover Inventory Turnover


Fixed Asset Turnover Total Asset Turnover

Account Receivable Inventory Fixed Total Asset


Turnover Turnover Asset Turnover
Turnover
2016 7.47 5.7 3.1 0.18
2017 7 3.2 3.2 0.19
2018 5.88 4.4 3.5 0.19
2019 6.23 5.1 3.5 0.2
2020 5.45 5.7 3.2 0.17
Leverage
8%
7%

6%
5%

4%

3%
2%

1%

0%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Debt Ratio Debt to Equity Ratio

Debt Debt to Equity


Ratio Ratio

2016 5% 5%
2017 6% 6%
2018 6% 7%
2019 6% 7%
2020 5% 6%
Profitibality
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Gross Profit Net Profit Operating Profit Return on Return on Equity
Margin Margin Margin Assets

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Gross Net Profit Operating Return on Return on


Profit Margin Profit Margin Assets Equity
Margin
2016 15% 26% 29% 5% 5.11%
2017 13% 29% 30% 5% 5.74%
2018 12% 24% 26% 5% 5.07%
2019 13% 26% 27% 5% 5.42%
2020 10% 33% 34% 5.48% 5.79%

You might also like