THEORETICAL EXAMINATION
OF OXIDATION OF FERRITIC
STAINLESS STEEL
MTLE-4150 10/05/2020
Abstract
This is a theoretical experiment focused on determining whether the rate of physisorbion of
oxygen on the surface of ferritic stainless steels is consistent with the growth rate of oxide
layers on these steels. The impingement rate of oxygen was calculated and compared against
the growth rate of oxide layers. It was concluded that oxygen in air is in excess and therefore
does not affect the rate of growth reaction. Rather, the rate of growth is affected by oxide layer
thickness due to slower diffusion in thicker layers and an electrochemical mechanism of oxygen
diffusion.
1
Contents
Abstract............................................................................................................................................1
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................3
Methods...........................................................................................................................................6
Experiment Overview...................................................................................................................6
Apparatus.....................................................................................................................................7
Procedures...................................................................................................................................7
Results and Discussion...................................................................................................................11
Conclusion......................................................................................................................................12
References.....................................................................................................................................13
Introduction
I conducted this theoretical experiment to determine the kinetic relation between physisorbed
oxygen on the surface of stainless steels and oxide growth on these stainless steels at high
temperature. I have also provided a theoretical mechanism by which gaseous oxygen is
2
incorporated into growing oxides based on the kinetics of physisorbed oxygen on these specific
stainless steels. This experiment draws its data from “Oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of
aluminum modified ultra-pure low chromium ferritic stainless steels” by Xu et al. Ferritic
stainless steels are a class of stainless steel that have between 10% and 30% chromium in
addition to other metals such as titanium and aluminum (Handbook of Materials failure).
Corrosion is the growth of oxides on metals which reduces structural integrity. This growth is
increased at higher temperatures due to kinetics and is as a result of oxygen atoms making
their way into metals. The movement of oxygen atoms through layers by bonding chemically
can be called diffusion. This study is related to exhaust systems which operate at high
temperatures and are expected to maintain structural integrity during use. Exhaust systems are
made using stainless steel, a corrosion-resistant metal, in order to prevent metal degradation
due to oxidation. A specific class of stainless steel, the ferritic stainless steels (FSSs), were
observed during the study. Oxide growth refers to what is typically known as “metal rust”. The
rusting of metal occurs as a result of a chemical reaction known as oxidation. Oxidation can be
defined as the addition of oxygen to a chemical species. It can also be defined as a loss of
electrons by a chemical species. The opposite of oxidation is reduction and reactions where
oxidation and reduction occur simultaneously are characterized as redox reactions. In order for
rusting of a metal to occur, oxygen must chemically bond to the metal atomic species. Air is
comprised of about 21% oxygen. Therefore when a metal is present in air at a high
temperature, oxidation reactions at the surface of the metal occur. The result of the oxidation
of a metal is a new compound (called a metal oxide) made of both the metal subject and
oxygen chemically bonded. This metal oxide forms a layer between the rest of the metal subject
3
and the air, preventing further oxidation of the metal (Xu et al). As the metal oxide grows, the
distance that an oxygen molecule needs to travel through it in order to reach the metal
increases. This causes the rate of metal oxide growth to reduce as the metal oxide grows. It is
this phenomenon relating to a varying rate of reaction that enables a kinetic study of such
oxidation to occur. In tandem with the experimental results, a mechanism which took into
account the reduction in rate as the reaction progressed was proposed. In order to calculate
the amount of oxygen reaching the surface, a formula for the impingement rate (number of
particles which hit a surface per second and unit area), I, was used. Here is the impingement
rate as Equation 1
P atoms
I= ( 2 )
√2 πmk B T cm ⋅ s
28.84 g /mol
P=Pressure ( Pa ) ; m= 23
; k B=1.38 ×10−23 ; T =temperature ( Kelvin)
6.022 ×10 atoms/mol
Equation 1: Impingement rate
The rate of oxide growth is characterized as “parabolic oxidation”. This factors in the rate of
growth reducing as the oxide grows. This phenomenon can be shown as a curved graph as
shown below with its characteristic equation. In parabolic oxidation, there is a constant, k p,
known as the parabolic rate constant (Saunders et al)
4
(Saunders et al)
Figure 1: Parabolic oxidation
dX k p
=
dt X
(Saunders et al)
Equation 2: Parabolic rate equation
5
Methods
Experiment Overview
The experiment by Xu et al investigated at 800°C and 1000°C the oxidation behavior of ultra-
pure low chromium ferritic stainless steels over a time period of one hour. Xu et al produced
graphs of weight gain (mg/mm2 or μg/mm2) versus Oxidation time (hours) for each alloy tested.
Xu et al also provided a table consisting of data for each respective alloy: Temperature,
oxidation time and parabolic rate constant. I calculated the impingement rate of oxygen
molecules using Equation 1 with the assumption that pressure was equal to atmospheric
pressure because Xu et al did not measure pressure. In order to determine the kinetic
relationship with the rate of oxide growth, this impingement rate was compared to the oxide
growth rate. I assumed that every oxide was 50% oxygen and had a density of 5 g/cm 3. From my
calculations, the rate of oxygen impinging on the metal surface was in excess to the rate
necessary for oxide growth. Since oxide growth is fastest at the beginning of each experiment,
the weight shortly after the oxidation process began was used. From the Xu et al experiment,
this weight was estimated to be 0.02 mg. Dividing the k p by 0.02 mg results in a value much
smaller than the oxygen impingement rate. My next step was to form a mechanism of chemical
reactions to provide a theoretical method of oxygen reaching into the various oxide layers for
further growth. Xu et al provided electron microscope images of the samples which showed
complex mixing of different metal oxide layers adding to the thickness of the oxide layers. This
complex mixing was incorporated into the mechanism I proposed for gaseous oxygen reaching
the oxide layers. My mechanism took into consideration the fact that water (aqueous solvent) is
necessary for oxidation. I proposed sets of chemical equations by paying attention to the
6
transfer of electrons in redox reactions. For the complex mixing of oxides, I considered the fact
that more reactive species can displace less reactive species in order to turn one oxide into
another.
Apparatus
This was a theoretical experiment. In order to perform it, an understanding of chemical kinetics,
basic chemistry and calculus was necessary. Lastly the experiment by Xu et al is necessary for
the data used
Procedures
Impingement rate of oxygen atoms compared to oxide growth rate
From Equation 1 calculate the impingement rate of air. From the Xu et al experiment,
the two temperatures to be considered (T) are 800°C and 1000°C. Calculate an
impingement rate for each temperature
o The values listed under Equation 1 can be considered at standard for air
o Convert temperature in degrees Celsius to Kelvin by:
° K=° C+273.15
Air is about 21% oxygen, therefore multiply each calculated impingement rate by factor
0.21
Oxygen is a diatomic molecule (two atoms for every molecule) so multiply each
impingement rate by factor 2
7
atoms
Equation 1 is in units ( ). Multiply each impingement rate by factor 3600 (s/hour)
cm 2 ⋅ s
atoms
in order to change units to ( )
cm 2 ⋅hr
atoms
Multiply each impingement rate by factor 1 ×10−2 in order to change units to ( )
mm2 ⋅ hr
One oxygen atom has a mass of 2.657 ×10−20mg/atom.
Multiply the impingement rate at 1000°C by 2.657 ×10−20mg/atom to get units
mg
( )
mm2 ⋅ hr
o The oxide weight gain for T = 800°C was measured with micrograms instead of
milligrams. Doing calculations for 800°C obtained similar results so it is not
added to evaluation. However, by following the procedure with the mass of
oxygen in micrograms, the calculations may be obtained if desired.
With the impingement rate of oxygen obtained, I calculated the rate of oxide growth to
see if there was sufficient oxygen for growth of oxide. Due to parabolic oxidation, the
rate is highest at the beginning. For the 1.51Al-0.12Ti alloy, the weight gain after
approximately 4 hours (out of a 100 hour experiment) was approximately 5.0 ×10−4
mg/mm2. The parabolic rate constant for this alloy at 1000°C was 1.1 ×10−7 mg2/(mm4hr)
o From Equation 2, the rate of increase in oxide mass is given by
d (weight gain) kp
=
dt ( weight gain)
o Do this calculation (parabolic rate constant/weight gain)
8
mg
o The units for this calculation should be ( )
mm2 ⋅ hr
I observed that the impingement rate of oxygen was much larger than the oxide growth
rate at the beginning of the experiment.
o In addition, the oxides are assumed to be only 50% oxygen so the oxide growth
rate with respect to oxygen content is the growth rate divided by 2.
Mechanism for addition of oxygen into oxide layers
In order for oxidation of metals to occur. A solvent of some form is needed in order to allow
dissociation of chemicals into cations and anions (Ahmad). Since the experiment was not
carried out in any special conditions, I assumed an aqueous environment since there is an
amount of water in air. Water is a polar molecule. This means that on an atomic level the
density of the electron cloud around water molecules is shifted towards a specific atom. Since
water is made of hydrogen and oxygen, the larger electron density is situated around oxygen
because oxygen has a larger affinity for electrons than hydrogen. Due to these partial positive
and negative charges on each water molecule, water can attach to positive and negative ions
and break them apart (i.e. dissolve them). Therefore, I propose that hydrated metal hydroxides
are formed. After reverse hydrolysis (removal of water) (researchgate.com), these metal
hydroxides produce metal oxides. There are some decomposition and synthesis reactions as
well. The mechanisms consist of chains of ionic equations with the end products being oxides,
water and evolution of hydrogen. The overall ionic equations of the mechanism are detailed
below
Dissociation of water:
9
2 H 2 O → H 2 +2 O H −¿¿
Formation of iron(III) oxide:
4 Fe+3 O 2+ H 2 +2 O H −¿→ 4 FeO (OH ) ¿
Method 1 :2 FeO ( OH ) → Fe2 O3 + H 2 O( Decomposition)
Formation of iron(II,III) oxide:
2+¿ (OH) +4 H ¿
8 2
3+¿ Fe ¿
−¿ → Fe ¿
3+¿+ Fe+ ¿+ 4 H +8 O H ¿
¿
2 Fe
2
Method 1 : Fe3 (OH )8 → Fe3 O 4 + 4 H 2 O( Decomposition )
Method 2 : FeO+ Fe 2 O 3 → Fe3 O 4 (Synthesis)
Formation of chromium(III) oxide:
2 Cr+3 H 2 +6 O H−¿→ 2Cr (OH ) +3 H 3 2 ¿
Method 1 :2Cr (OH )3 →Cr 2 O3 +3 H 2 O( Decomposition)
Formation of aluminum(III) oxide:
2 Al +3 H 2+ 6 O H −¿ →2 Al(OH ) +3 H 3 2 ¿
Method 1 :2 Al (OH )3 → Al2 O 3+ 3 H 2 O( Decomposition)
Method 2 :2 Al +Cr2 O 3 → Al2 O 3+ 2Cr ( Replacement )
Formation of titanium dioxide
10
2 Ti+3 H 2 +6 OH −¿→ 2 H 2 TiO3 +4 H 2¿
Method 1 : H 2 Ti O 3 → TiO 2 + H 2 O( Decomposition )
Results and Discussion
From the experiment I concluded that the rate at which oxygen molecules are able to reach the
surface of each metal alloy is much higher than the rate of usage of oxygen (in forming metal
oxides) at any stage of the reaction, with the highest rate of usage of oxygen at the beginning.
As the oxide layers get thicker and more complex (i.e. different combinations of oxides), oxygen
atoms has a larger distance to diffuse across in order to react with the metal atoms to form
oxides. Also, the complexity of layers results in oxygen atoms having to go through a series of
reactions in order to reach the covered alloy surface. It is because of these reasons that Xu et al
observed parabolic oxidation, given the fact that the larger the oxide layers grow the stronger
the oxidation buffer. It can then be concluded that oxide layers can prevent further oxidation of
metals. However, Xu et al did not consider the effect of an excessively heavy oxide layer. In
such an event the oxide layer would fail under stress, in turn causing a burst of relatively rapid
oxidation (Handbook of Materials failure). This might result in downwards rusting of a metal
alloy (through its cross section - parallel) instead of the proposed surface rusting (on surface
perpendicular to cross section). Corrosion is an electrochemical process since it involves the
transfer of electrons through redox reactions in addition to “cathode-like” and “anode-like”
presences (for example hydrogen evolution at the “anodes” of these reactions) (Song). Further
evidence to corrosion being an electrochemical process lies in the facts that chromia (Cr2O3)
oxide scales are electrically conductive and corrosion behavior is influenced by electric current
11
(Kodjamanova). In my proposed mechanism, there is a reaction in which aluminum displaces
chromium (in Cr2O3) leading to aluminum(III) oxide formation and the element chromium being
released back to react again. It is through these complex reactions that layers of multiple oxides
are formed.
Conclusion
I have developed a mechanism for the oxidation of FSSs through emphasis on the
electrochemical properties of oxidation and the occurrence of redox reactions. I have also
determined that the impingement rate of oxygen molecules on a FSS’s surface is in large excess
of the amount of oxygen necessary for FSS oxide growth.
12
References
(1)
Xu, Y.; Fu, H.; Fan, L.; Lu, B.; Zhao, H.; Dong, H. Oxidation Kinetics and Mechanisms of Aluminum
Modified Ultra-Pure Low Chromium Ferritic Stainless Steels. Corros. Sci. 2019, 161 (108192),
108192.
(2)
Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis with Case Studies from the Aerospace and Automotive
Industries; Makhlouf, A. S. H., Aliofkhazraei, M., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Woburn, MA,
2016.
(3)
Saunders, S. R. J.; Nicholls, J. R. Oxidation, Hot Corrosion and Protection of Metallic Materials. In
Physical Metallurgy; Cahn, R. W., Haasen†, P., Eds.; Elsevier, 1996; pp 1291–1361.
(4)
Ahmad, Z. Principles of Corrosion Engineering and Corrosion Control; Butterworth-Heinemann:
Oxford, England, 2006.
(5)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293349477_Fe3O4_and_Fe_nanoparticles_by_che
mical_reduction_of_Feacac3_by_ascorbic_acid_Role_of_water (accessed Oct 7, 2020).
13
(6)
Song, G.-L. Corrosion of Magnesium Alloys; Song, G.-L., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge,
England, 2011.
(7)
Kodjamanova, P.; Fu, Q.; Gautier, L. Electric Current Effects on the Corrosion Behaviour of High
Chromium Ferritic Steels. Oxid. Met. 2013, 79 (1–2), 53–64.
14