A PROJECT REPORT ON

" A STUDY ON MARKETING & SALES

PROMOTIONS THROUGH BRAND LOYALTY
PROGRAM OF COCA-COLA INDIA"

SUBMITTED TO :

SUBMITTED TO : SUBMITTED BY :
Dr. S.D SINGH SACHIN KUMAR
Professor Roll No - 19039
L.N.M.I PATNA MBA - ( MARKETING) 2019-21
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

There is always a sense of gratitude one expresses to others for the helpful and needy
service they render during all phases of life. I have completed this project with the help
of different personalities. I wish to express my gratitude towards all of them.

It gives me immense pleasure to express my deep regards and sincere sense of gratitude
to DR. S.D SINGH , Professor L.NM.I PATNA. I would also like to thank my guide
for steering my confidence and capability for giving me insight into training by giving
me exposure to the arena of competitive and real world.
Lastly I would like to thank my parents and my friends for their constant
support during the duration of my training.

SACHIN KUMAR
 DECLARATION

I hereby declare that the projects entitled " " COCA-COLA COMPANY AND
IMPACT ON MARKETING & SALES PROMOTIONS THROUGH BRAND
I LOYALTY PROGRAM OF COCA-COLA INDIA" conducted has been
prepared by me under the guidance of our my teacher & project Guide DR. S.D
SINGH.

I also declare that this project is the result of my effort and has not been
submitted to any other University or Institution for the award of any degree, or
personal favors whatsoever. All the details and analysis provided in the report
hold true to the best of my knowledge. UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR.
S.D.SINGH ,Professor L.N.M.I.Patna, Bihar

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF

Dr. S.D Singh
Professor
L.NM.I Patna, Bihar
 CONTENT
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION - PAGE 1-4

CHAPTER 2 INDUSTRY PROFILE - PAGE 5-8

CHAPTER 3 COMPANY PROFILE - PAGE 9-32

 COCA-COLA COMPANY - PAGE 10-14

 GLOBAL MARKET SHARE OF COCA- - PAGE 14-15

COLA

- PAGE 16-18
 TRENDS AND FORCES

 SWOT ANALYSIS - PAGE 19-26

 COCA-COLA INDIA - PAGE 27-28

 PRODUCTS IN INDIA
- PAGE 28-32

CHAPTER 4 BRAND LOYALTY PROGRAMMES OF COCA-COLA - PAGE 33-39

CHAPTER 5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY PAGE 40-44

CHAPTER 6 DATA ANALYSIS PAGE 45-50

CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS - PAGE 51-53
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDICES : - PAGE 54
QUESTIONNAIRE - PAGE 55-56
 1.
INTRODUCTION

Page 4
Page 1
 1.
INTRODUCTION

Page 2
 INTRODUCTON
Let reason go before every enterprise,

And counsel before every action

Research is a human activity based on intellectual investigation and is aimed at

discovering, interpreting, and revising human knowledge on different aspects of
the world.

MARKETING RESEARCH:-

Marketing research is the function that links the consumer, customer and public
to the marketer through information used to identify and define marketing
opportunities and problems; generate, refine, and evaluate marketing actions;
monitor marketing performance; and improve understanding of marketing as a
process. Marketing research specifies the information required to address these
issues, designs the methods for collecting information, manages and implements
the data collection process, analyzes and communicates the findings and their
implications.

-American Marketing Association

Marketing research is about researching the whole company’s marketing

process.

-Palmer (2000)

Page 3
 INTRODUCTION TO COCA-COLA

Coca-Cola, the product that has given the world its best-known taste was born in Atlanta,
Georgia, on May 8, 1886. Coca-Cola Company is the world’s leading manufacturer, marketer
and distributor of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups, used to produce nearly
400 beverage brands. It sells beverage concentrates and syrups to bottling and canning
operators, distributors, fountain retailers and fountain wholesalers. The Company’s beverage
products comprises of bottled and canned soft drinks as well as concentrates, syrups and not-
ready-to-drink powder products. In addition to this, it also produces and markets sports
drinks, tea and coffee. The Coca- Cola Company began building its global network in the
1920s. Now operating in more than 200 countries and producing nearly 400 brands, the Coca-
Cola system has successfully applied a simple formula on a global scale: “Provide a moment
of refreshment for a small amount of money- a billion times a day.”

The Coca-Cola Company and its network of bottlers comprise the most sophisticated and
pervasive production and distribution system in the world. More than anything, that system is
dedicated to people working long and hard to sell the products manufactured by the
Company. This unique worldwide system has made The Coca-Cola Company the world’s
premier soft-drink enterprise. From Boston to Beijing, from Montreal to Moscow, Coca-Cola,
more than any other consumer product, has brought pleasure to thirsty consumers around the
globe. For more than 115 years, Coca-Cola has created a special moment of pleasure for
hundreds of millions of people every day.
The Company aims at increasing shareowner value over time. It accomplishes this by
working with its business partners to deliver satisfaction and value to consumers through a
worldwide system of superior brands and services, thus increasing brand equity on a global
basis. They aim at managing their business well with people who are strongly committed to
the Company values and culture and providing an appropriately controlled environment, to
meet business goals and objectives. The associates of this Company jointly take
responsibility to ensure compliance with the framework of policies and protect the
Company’s assets and resources whilst limiting business risks.

Page 4
 2.
INDUSTRY PROFILE

Page 5
 INDUSTRY PROFILE

A BRIEF INSIGHT - THE FMCG INDUSTRY IN INDIA

Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), also known as Consumer Packaged Goods (CPG)
are products that have a quick turnover and relatively low cost. Consumers generally put less
thought into the purchase of FMCG than they do for other products.

The Indian FMCG industry witnessed significant changes through the 1990s. Many players
had been facing severe problems on account of increased competition from small and
regional players and from slow growth across its various product categories. As a result, most
of the companies were forced to revamp their product, marketing, distribution and customer
service strategies to strengthen their position in the market.

By the turn of the 20th century, the face of the Indian FMCG industry had changed
significantly. With the liberalization and growth of the Indian economy, the Indian customer
witnessed an increasing exposure to new domestic and foreign products through different
media, such as television and the Internet. Apart from this, social changes such as increase in
the number of nuclear families and the growing number of working couples resulting in
increased spending power also contributed to the increase in the Indian consumers' personal
consumption. The realization of the customer's growing awareness and the need to meet
changing requirements and preferences on account of changing lifestyles required the FMCG

Page 6
producing companies to formulate customer-centric strategies. These changes had a positive
impact, leading to the rapid growth in the FMCG industry. Increased availability of retail
space, rapid urbanization, and qualified manpower also boosted the growth of the organized
retailing sector.

HLL led the way in revolutionizing the product, market, distribution and service formats of
the FMCG industry by focusing on rural markets, direct distribution, creating new product,
distribution and service formats. The FMCG sector also received a boost by government led
initiatives in the 2003 budget such as the setting up of excise free zones in various parts of the
country that witnessed firms moving away from outsourcing to manufacturing by investing in
the zones.
Though the absolute profit made on FMCG products is relatively small, they generally sell in
large numbers and so the cumulative profit on such products can be large. Unlike some
industries, such as automobiles, computers, and airlines, FMCG does not suffer from mass
layoffs every time the economy starts to dip. A person may put off buying a car but he will
not put off having his dinner.

Unlike other economy sectors, FMCG share float in a steady manner irrespective of global
market dip, because they generally satisfy rather fundamental, as opposed to luxurious needs.
The FMCG sector, which is growing at the rate of 9% is the fourth largest sector in the Indian
Economy and is worth Rs.93000 cr. The main contributor, making up 32% of the sector, is
the South Indian region. It is predicted that in the year 2010, the FMCG sector will be worth
Rs.143000 cr. The sector being one of the biggest sectors of the Indian Economy provides up
to 4 million jobs. (Source: HCCBPL, Monthly Circular)

Page 7
 A BRIEF INSIGHT - BEVERAGE INDUSTRY IN INDIA
In India, beverages form an important part of the lives of people. It is an industry, in which
the players constantly innovate, in order to come up with better products to gain more
consumers and satisfy the existing consumers.

BEVERAGES

NON-
ALCOHOLIC
ALCOHOLIC

NON-
CARBONATED
CARBONATED

COLA NON-COLA NON-COLA

Fig 2.0 BEVERAGES IN INDIA

The beverage industry is vast and there various ways of segmenting it, so as to cater the
right product to the right person. The different ways of segmenting it are as follows:

 Alcoholic, non-alcoholic and sports beverages.

 Natural and Synthetic beverages.
 In-home consumption and out of home on premises consumption.
 Age wise segmentation i.e. beverages for kids, for adults and for senior citizens.
 Segmentation based on the amount of consumption i.e. high levels of consumption
and low levels of consumption.

Page 8
 3.

COMPANY PROFILE

Page 9
 COMPANY PROFILE

MISSION:

Our Roadmap starts with our mission, which is enduring. It declares our purpose as a
company and serves as the standard against which we weigh our actions and decisions.

 To refresh the world...

 To inspire moments of optimism and happiness...
 To create value and make a difference.

VISION:
Our vision serves as the framework for our Roadmap and guides every aspect of our business
by describing what we need to accomplish in order to continue achieving sustainable, quality
growth.
 People: Be a great place to work where people are inspired to be the best they can be.
 Portfolio: Bring to the world a portfolio of quality beverage brands that anticipate
and satisfy people's desires and needs.
 Partners: Nurture a winning network of customers and suppliers, together we create
mutual, enduring value.
 Planet: Be a responsible citizen that makes a difference by helping build and support
sustainable communities.

Page 10
  Profit: Maximize long-term return to shareowners while being mindful of our overall
responsibilities.
 Productivity: Be a highly effective, lean and fast-moving organization.
WINNING CULTURE:
Our Winning Culture defines the attitudes and behaviours that will be required of us to make
our 2020 Vision a reality.

LIVE OUR VALUES :

Our values serve as a compass for our actions and describe how we behave in the world.
 Leadership: The courage to shape a better future.
 Collaboration: Leverage collective genius.
 Integrity: Be real.
 Accountability: If it is to be, it's up to me.
 Passion: Committed in heart and mind.
 Diversity: As inclusive as our brands.
 Quality: What we do, we do well.
FOCUS ON THE MARKET:
 Focus on needs of our consumers, customers and franchise partners.
 Get out into the market and listen, observe and learn.
 Possess a world view.
 Focus on execution in the marketplace every day.
 Be insatiably curious.
WORK SMART:
 Act with urgency.
 Remain responsive to change.
 Have the courage to change course when needed.
 Remain constructively discontent.
 Work efficiently.

Page 11
ACT LIKE OWNERS:
 Be accountable for our actions and inactions.
 Steward system assets and focus on building value.
 Reward our people for taking risks and finding better ways to solve problems.
 Learn from our outcomes -- what worked and what didn’t.
BE THE BRAND:

Inspire creativity, passion, optimism and fun.

HISTORY OF COCA-COLA

The prototype Coca-Cola recipe was formulated at the Eagle Drug and Chemical Company, a
drugstore in Columbus, Georgia by John Pemberton, originally as a coca wine called
Pemberton's French Wine Coca. He may have been inspired by the formidable success of Vin
Mariani, a European cocawine.

In 1886, when Atlanta and Fulton County passed prohibition legislation, Pemberton
responded by developing Coca-Cola, essentially a non-alcoholic version of French Wine
Coca. The first sales were at Jacob's Pharmacy in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 8, 1886. It was
initially sold as a patent medicine for five cents a glass at soda fountains, which were popular
in the United States at the time due to the belief that carbonated water was good for the
health.[9] Pemberton claimed Coca-Cola cured many diseases, including morphine addiction,
dyspepsia, neurasthenia, headache, and impotence. Pemberton ran the first advertisement for
the beverage on May 29 of the same year in the Atlanta Journal.

By 1888, three versions of Coca-Cola — sold by three separate businesses — were on the
market. Asa Griggs Candler acquired a stake in Pemberton's company in 1887 and
incorporated it as the Coca Cola Company in 1888. The same year, while suffering from an
ongoing addiction to morphine, Pemberton sold the rights a second time to four more
businessmen: J.C. Mayfield, A.O. Murphey, C.O. Mullahy and E.H. Bloodworth. Meanwhile,
Pemberton's alcoholic son Charley Pemberton began selling his own version of the product.

Page 12
John Pemberton declared that the name "Coca-Cola" belonged to Charley, but the other two
manufacturers could continue to use the formula. So, in the summer of 1888, Candler sold his
beverage under the names Yum Yum and Koke. After both failed to catch on, Candler set out
to establish a legal claim to Coca-Cola in late 1888, in order to force his two competitors out
of the business. Candler purchased exclusive rights to the formula from John Pemberton,
Margaret Dozier and Woolfolk Walker. However, in 1914, Dozier came forward to claim her
signature on the bill of sale had been forged, and subsequent analysis has indicated John
Pemberton's signature was most likely a forgery as well.

In 1892 Candler incorporated a second company, The Coca-Cola Company (the current
corporation), and in 1910 Candler had the earliest records of the company burned, further
obscuring its legal origins. By the time of its 50th anniversary, the drink had reached the
status of a national icon in the USA. In 1935, it was certified kosher by Rabbi Tobias Geffen,
after the company made minor changes in the sourcing of some ingredients.

Coca-Cola was sold in bottles for the first time on March 12, 1894. The first outdoor wall
advertisement was painted in the same year as well in Cartersville, Georgia. Cans of Coke
first appeared in 1955. The first bottling of Coca-Cola occurred in Vicksburg, Mississippi, at
the Biedenharn Candy Company in 1891. Its proprietor was Joseph A. Biedenharn. The
original bottles were Biedenharn bottles, very different from the much later hobble-skirt
design that is now so familiar. Asa Candler was tentative about bottling the drink, but two
entrepreneurs from Chattanooga, Tennessee, Benjamin F. Thomas and Joseph B. Whitehead,
proposed the idea and were so persuasive that Candler signed a contract giving them control
of the procedure for only one dollar. Candler never collected his dollar, but in 1899
Chattanooga became the site of the first Coca-Cola bottling company. The loosely termed
contract proved to be problematic for the company for decades to come. Legal matters were
not helped by the decision of the bottlers to subcontract to other companies, effectively
becoming parent bottlers. Coke concentrate, or Coke syrup, was and is sold separately at
pharmacies in small quantities, as an over-the-counter remedy for nausea or mildly upset
stomach.

Page 13
On April 23, 1985, Coca-Cola, amid much publicity, attempted to change the formula of the
drink with "New Coke". Follow-up taste tests revealed that most consumers preferred the
taste of New Coke to both Coke and Pepsi, but Coca-Cola management was unprepared for
the public's nostalgia for the old drink, leading to a backlash. The company gave in to
protests and returned to a variation of the old formula, under the name Coca-Cola Classic on
July 10, 1985.

On February 7, 2005, the Coca-Cola Company announced that in the second quarter of 2005
they planned to launch a Diet Coke product sweetened with the artificial sweetener sucralose,
the same sweetener currently used in Pepsi One. On March 21, 2005, it announced another
diet product, Coca-Cola Zero, sweetened partly with a blend of aspartame and acesulfame
potassium. In 2007, Coca-Cola began to sell a new "healthy soda": Diet Coke with vitamins
B6, B12, magnesium, niacin, and zinc, marketed as "Diet Coke Plus”. On July 5, 2005, it was
revealed that Coca-Cola would resume operations in Iraq for the first time since the Arab
League boycotted the company in 1968.

In April 2007, in Canada, the name "Coca-Cola Classic" was changed back to "Coca-Cola."
The word "Classic" was truncated because "New Coke" was no longer in production,
eliminating the need to differentiate between the two. The formula remained unchanged.

In January 2009, Coca-Cola stopped printing the word "Classic" on the labels of 16-ounce
bottles sold in parts of the southeastern United States. The change is part of a larger strategy
to rejuvenate the product's image. In November 2009, due to a dispute over wholesale prices
of Coca-Cola products, Costco stopped restocking its shelves with Coke and Diet Coke.

GLOBAL MARKET SHARE OF COCA-COLA

In 2009, the company generated revenues of $31 billion with $6.8 billion net income. An
increased consumer preference for healthier drinks has resulted in slowing growth rates for
sales of carbonated soft drinks (abbreviated as CSD), which constitutes 78% of KO’s sales.
KO’s profits are also vulnerable to the volatile costs for the raw materials used to make
drinks - such as the corn syrup used as a sweetener, the aluminium used in cans, and the
plastic used in bottles. Furthermore, slowing consumer spending in Coke's large North
American market compounds the challenge of increasing costs and a weak economic

Page 14
environment. Finally, Coca-Cola earns approximately 75% of revenue from international
sales, exposing it to currency fluctuations, which are particularly adverse with a stronger U.S.
Dollar (USD).

Despite these challenges, Coca-Cola has remained profitable. Though the non-CSD market is
growing quickly, the traditional CSD market is still large in terms of both revenues and
volume and highly lucrative. The size and variety of KO’s offerings in the CSD category,
coupled with the unparalleled brand equity of the Coca-Cola trademark, has allowed KO to
maintain its share of this important market. KO has also responded to consumers’ changing
tastes with new, non-CSD product launches and acquisitions such as that of Glaceau in 2007.
Strong international growth has also more than offset a weak domestic market.

On February 25, Coca-Cola Company announced its plan to buy Coca-Cola Enterprises
(CCE) for $12.3 million.[7] Since spinning of Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) 24 years ago, the
soft drink market has changed dramatically with consumers buying fewer soft drinks and
more non-carbonated beverages, such as Powerade and Dasani water. Under the new deal,
Coca-Cola Company will take control of the bottler's North America operations, giving the
company control over 90% of the total North America volume. In return, Coca-Cola
Enterprises will take over Coke's bottling operations in Norway and Sweden, becoming a
European-focused producer and distributor.

In March 2010, Coca-Cola Company entered into discussions to buy the Russian juice
company, OAO Nidan Juices. The company is 75% owned by a private equity firm in
London and 25% by its Russian founders and controls 14.5% of the Russian juice market. If
successful, the purchase would add to Coca-Cola's 20.5% market share, passing Pepsi's 30%
market share. The Russian juice market is estimated to be $3.2 billion dollars, and estimates
of Nidan's purchase price are between $560-$620 million.

In April 2010, Coca-Cola Company purchased a majority share of Innocent, the British fruit
smoothie maker. Last year the company bought an 18% share of the company for more than
$45 million, and recent purchases of additional shares increased Coke's stake to 58%.

In June 2010, Coca-Cola Company agreed to pay Dr Pepper Snapple Group (DPS) $715
million for the continued right to sell their products following the company's acquisition of
Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE). The deal covers the next 20 years with an option to renew for
an additional 20 years.

Page 15
 TRENDS AND FORCES

 The Global Economic Recession Threatens Overall Demand:

In 2008 and 2009, the global economy has fallen into a recession. Not just the United States
but countries from all over the world have felt the impacts of the 2008 Financial Crisis. This
may be a problem for Coke, which derives approximately 75% of its sales from outside North
America. Still, the company has positioned itself well in international markets both
organically and through acquisitions, such as that of Chinese juice maker Huiyuan for $2.4
billion. However the company was unsuccessful with its purchase of Huiyuan as it broke
antitrust laws in China. On March 5, 2010, Coke's CEO said that emerging markets are
bouncing back quicker than more developed markets.

 New Aversion to Soda Threatens Main Business:

74% of the Coca Cola Company's products are classified as carbonated soft drinks, making it
particularly sensitive to changes in demand for CSD. Consumer demand for CSD has been
negatively affected by concerns about health and wellness. This is true across most of KO's
markets. There has been an increase in the number of regulations regarding CSD in the
United States in response to the heightened desire for healthy food consumption.

In 2006, many state public school systems banned the sale of soft drinks on their campuses.
The Centre for Science and Public Interest proposed that a warning label be placed on all
beverages containing more than 13g of sugar per 12-oz serving. This proposal would affect
all non-diet, full calorie drinks produced by KO. These factors have driven a shift in
consumption away from CSD to healthier alternatives, such as tea, juices, and water.

Within the CSD segment consumers have been moving away from sugared drinks, opting
instead for diet beverages, which do not generally contain any sugar or calories.

Though KO has been somewhat slow to respond to this shift in consumer preferences, it has
recently begun to increase its development of both diet CSD and non-CSD beverages. KO is
faced with the task of balancing the risk of new innovations with the low growth rates of
established brands, a predicament for manufactures throughout the beverage industry.

Page 16
  Integrated Bottler Strategy Increases Flexibility:
After CEO Neville Isdell was brought out of retirement in 2004 to revive the then flagging
beverage maker, one of the first areas that he targeted for improvement was KO's frayed
relations with its extensive network of bottlers. Since consolidating all company-owned
bottlers into the Bottling Investments division, Isdell has continued to increase KO's interest
in its bottlers through stake purchases or outright buyouts. This strategy represents a
weakening of the division between KO's production and distribution operations. Isdell
believes that by combining production and distribution operations the company will have
enhanced its ability to quickly respond to changing market conditions. In KO's 2007 Q3
Analyst call, Isdell credited the outright purchase of Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines (CCBPI)
for double-digit volume growth in that country. Additionally, KO has signed new agreements
with many of its bottlers which allow them to distribute drinks produced by other companies.
For example, Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) now distributes Arizona, a ready-to-drink tea
made by Ferolito, Vultaggio & Sons, an American iced-tea company. Isdell sees these
agreements as another way of taking advantage of the rapidly growing non-CSD market.

 Bottled Water Falling Out of Favour:

In Q3 2009, Dasani bottled water's revenues fell by double digits; this decrease is emblematic
of the bottled water industry as a whole. In August 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that
sales of bottled water had fallen for the first time in five years. The combination of the
recession and upper class consumers' increased environmental consciousness has lead many
customers to cut back on bottled water in favour of tap water and reusable containers.

Following this trend, at least one town in Washington state and one in Australia have
outlawed the selling of bottled water within their city limits. In 2008, bottled water was the
third most popular beverage (behind soda and milk), but compared to 2007, Americans
consumption declined for the first time, down to 8.7 billion gallons from 8.8 billion gallons.
Although this is a seemingly small decrease, industry experts don't expect bottled water to
bounce back anytime soon.

Page 17
  Dollar Affects International Performance:

Another trend affecting Coca-Cola is the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar (USD). Although
the company is based in the US, KO derives about 75% of its operating income from outside
United States. Because of this, the company is very sensitive to the strength of the dollar. As
foreign currencies weaken relative to the dollar, goods sold in foreign markets are suddenly
worth fewer dollars back in the US, lowering earnings. Thus, if the dollar strengthens (as it
did in the second half of 2008 and 2009), it has a negative effect on KO's earnings. Coca-
Cola executives expect currency fluctuations to adversely affect 3Q09 operating income by
10-12% and 4Q09 operating income by high single digits.

KO has broad exposure to foreign currencies and actively hedges a large portion of these to
avoid wide swings in earnings from currency fluctuations. Although this hedging insulates
from the potential downside of a strengthening dollar, it also limits larger gains from drastic
downswings in the dollar's value.

 Commodity Cost Fluctuations Affect Margins:

The Coca-Cola Company’s profitability can be affected both directly and indirectly by the
costs of various production inputs. KO itself is responsible for purchasing the raw materials
used to make its concentrates and syrups. Variations in the prices for these goods can affect
the company’s total cost of production as well as its profit margins. Changes in the
production costs of bottlers can also impact KO’s profitability, though in a more indirect way.
If the raw materials necessary for bottling become more expensive, the bottler may be forced
to drastically raise prices to compensate.

Such a price increase would likely hurt KO, given the competitive nature of the non-alcoholic
beverage industry, and provide a possible incentive for consumers to switch to other
companies’ beverages.

Aluminium, corn, and PET resin are three examples of such production goods used by
bottlers that could have significant bearing on the Coca-Cola Company’s profit margins. In
2007, the prices of these commodities rose drastically with general commodities bubble and

Page 18
SWOT ANALYSIS OF COCA-COLA

STRENGTHES WEAKNESS
Negative Publicity.
World's leading brand.
Decline in cash from
Large scale of operations.
Operating Activities.
Robust revenue growth in 3
Sluggish Performance in
segments.
North America.
SWOT
ANALYSIS THREATS
OPPORTUNITIES
Acquisitions. Intense Competition.
Growing bottled water Dependence on bottling
market. Patners.
Growing Hispanic Population Sluggish growth of
in U.S. Carbonated beverages.

.
Fig 2.1 SWOT ANALYSIS OF COCA-COLA

Page 19
STRENGTHES:

 WORLD’S LEADING BRAND

Coca-Cola has strong brand recognition across the globe. The company has a leading brand
value and a strong brand portfolio. Business-Week and Inter-brand, a branding consultancy,
recognize. Coca-Cola as one of the leading brands in their top 100 global brands ranking in
2006.The Business Week-Inter-brand valued Coca-Cola at $67,000 million in 2006. Coca-
Cola ranks well ahead of its close competitor Pepsi which has a ranking of 22 having a brand
value of $12,690 million Furthermore; Coca-Cola owns a large portfolio of product brands.
The company owns four of the top five soft drink brands in the world: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke,
Sprite and Fanta.

Strong brands allow the company to introduce brand extensions such as Vanilla Coke, Cherry
Coke and Coke with Lemon. Over the years, the company has made large investments in
brand promotions. Consequently, Coca-cola is one of the best recognized global brands. The
company’s strong brand value facilitates customer recall and allows Coca-Cola to penetrate
new markets and consolidate existing ones.

 LARGE SCALE OF OPERATIONS

With revenues in excess of $24 billion Coca-Cola has a large scale of operation. Coca-Cola is
the largest manufacturer, distributor and marketer of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and
syrups in the world. Coco-Cola is selling trademarked beverage products since the year 1886
in the US. The company currently sells its products in more than 200 countries. Of the
approximately 52 billion beverage servings of all types consumed worldwide every day,
beverages bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to Coca-Cola account for more than 1.4
billion.

The company’s operations are supported by a strong infrastructure across the world. Coca-

Page 20
Cola owns and operates 32 principal beverage concentrates and/or syrup manufacturing
plants located throughout the world.

In addition, it owns or has interest in 37 operations with 95 principal beverage bottling and
canning plants located outside the US. The company also owns bottled water production and
still beverage facilities as well as a facility that manufactures juice concentrates. The
company’s large scale of operation allows it to feed upcoming markets with relative ease and
enhances its revenue generation capacity.

 ROBUST REVENUE GROWTH IN 3 SEGMENTS

Coca-Cola’s revenues recorded a double digit growth, in three operating segments. These
three segments are Latin America, ‘East, South Asia, and Pacific Rim’ and Bottling
investments. Revenues from Latin America grew by 20.4% during fiscal 2006, over 2005.
During the same period, revenues from ‘East, South Asia, and Pacific Rim’ grew by 10.6%
while revenues from the bottling investments segment by 19.9%.

Together, the three segments of “Latin America”, “East, South Asia” and “Pacific Rim”
bottling investments, accounted for 34.8% of total revenues during fiscal 2006. Robust
revenues growth rates in these segments contributed to top-line growth for Coca-Cola during
2006.

WEAKNESS:

 NEGATIVE PUBLICITY

The Coca-Cola Company has been involved in a number of controversies and lawsuits related
to its relationship with human rights violations and other perceived unethical practices. There
have been continuing criticisms regarding the Coca-Cola Company's relation to the Middle
East and U.S. foreign policy. The company received negative publicity in India during
September 2006.The company was accused by the Centre for Science and Environment
(CSE) of selling products containing pesticide residues. Coca-Cola products sold in and
around the Indian national capital region contained a hazardous pesticide residue.

Page 21
On 10 December 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wrote to Mr. Muhtar
Kent, President and Chief Executive Officer, to warn him that the FDA had concluded that
Coca-Cola's product Diet Coke Plus 20 FL OZ was is in violation of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act.

In January 2009, the US consumer group the Centre for Science in the Public Interest filed a
class-action lawsuit against Coca-Cola. The lawsuit was in regards to claims made, along
with the company's flavours, of Vitamin Water. Claims say that the 33 grams of sugar are
more harmful than the vitamins and other additives are helpful.

 SLUGGISH PERFORMANCE IN NORTH AMERICA

Coca-Cola’s performance in North America was far from robust. North America is Coca-
Cola’s core market generating about 30% of total revenues during fiscal 2006. Therefore, a
strong performance in North America is important for the company.

In North America the sale of unit cases did not record any growth. Unit case retail volume in
North America decreased 1% primarily due to weak sparkling beverage trends in the second
half of 2006 and decline in the warehouse-delivered water and juice businesses. Moreover,
the company also expects performance in North America to be weak during 2007. Sluggish
performance in North America could impact the company’s future growth prospects and
prevent Coca-Cola from recording a more robust top-line growth.

 DECLINE IN CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

The company’s cash flow from operating activities declined during fiscal 2006. Cash flows
from operating activities decreased 7% in 2006 compared to 2005. Net cash provided by
operating activities reached $5,957 million in 2006, from $6,423 million in 2005. Coca-
Cola’s cash flows from operating activities in 2006 also decreased compared with 2005 as a

Page 22
result of a contribution of approximately $216 million to a tax-qualified trust to fund retiree
medical benefits.

The decrease was also the result of certain marketing accruals recorded in 2005.Decline in
cash from operating activities reduces availability of funds for the company’s investing and
financing activities, which, in turn, increases the company’s exposure to debt markets and
fluctuating interest rates.

OPPORTUNITIES:

 ACQUISITIONS

During 2006, its acquisitions included Kerry Beverages, (KBL), which was subsequently,
reappointed Coca-Cola China Industries (CCCIL). Coca-Cola acquired a controlling
shareholding in KBL, its bottling joint venture with the Kerry Group, in Hong Kong.
The acquisition extended Coca-Cola’s control over manufacturing and distribution joint
ventures in nine Chinese provinces.

In Germany the company acquired Apollinaris which sells sparkling and still mineral water.
Coca-Cola has also acquired a 100% interest in TJC Holdings, a bottling company in South

Africa. Coca-Cola also made acquisitions in Australia and New Zealand during 2006. These
acquisitions strengthened Coca-Cola’s international operations.

These also give Coca- Cola an opportunity for growth, through new product launch or greater
penetration of existing markets. Stronger international operations increase the company’s
capacity to penetrate international markets and also gives it an opportunity to diversity its
revenue stream. On 25 February 2010, Coco cola confirms to acquire the Coca cola
enterprises (CCE) one the biggest bottler in North America. This strategy of coca cola
strengthens its operations internationally.

 GROWING BOTTLED WATER MARKET

Bottled water is one of the fastest-growing segments in the world’s food and beverage market

Page 23
owing to increasing health concerns. The market for bottled water in the US generated
revenues of about $15.6 billion in 2006.

Market consumption volumes were estimated to be 30 billion litres in 2006. The market's
consumption volume is expected to rise to 38.6 billion units by the end of 2010. This
represents a CAGR of 6.9% during 2005-2010.

In terms of value, the bottled water market is forecast to reach $19.3 billion by the end of
2010. In the bottled water market, the revenue of flavoured water (water-based, slightly
sweetened refreshment drink) segment is growing by about $10 billion annually. The
company’s Dasani brand water is the third best-selling bottled water in the US. Coca-Cola
could leverage its strong position in the bottled water segment to take advantage of growing
demand for flavoured water.

 GROWING HISPANIC POPULATION IN U.S

Hispanics are growing rapidly both in number and economic power. As a result, they have
become more important to marketers than ever before. In 2006, about 11.6 million US
households were estimated to be Hispanic. This translates into a Hispanic population of about
42 million.

The US Census estimates that by 2020, the Hispanic population will reach 60 million or
almost 18% of the total US population. The economic influence of Hispanics is growing even
faster than their population. Nielsen Media Research estimates that the buying power of
Hispanics will exceed $1 trillion by 2008- a 55% increase over 2003 levels.

Coca-Cola has extensive operations and an extensive product portfolio in the US. The
company can benefit from an expanding Hispanic population in the US, which would
translate into higher consumption of Coca-Cola products and higher revenues for the
company.

THREATS:

Page 24
  INTENSE COMPETITION

Coca-Cola competes in the non-alcoholic beverages segment of the commercial beverages

industry. The company faces intense competition in various markets from regional as well as
global players. Also, the company faces competition from various non-alcoholic sparkling
beverages including juices and nectars and fruit drinks. In many of the countries in which
Coca-Cola operates, including the US, PepsiCo is one of the company’s primary competitors.
Other significant competitors include Nestle, Cadbury Schweppes, Groupe DANONE and
Kraft Foods.

Competitive factors impacting the company’s business include pricing, advertising, sales
promotion programs, product innovation, and brand and trademark development and
protection. Intense competition could impact Coca-Cola’s market share and revenue growth
rates.

 DEPENDENCE ON BOTTLING PARTNERS

Coca-Cola generates most of its revenues by selling concentrates and syrups to bottlers in
whom it doesn’t have any ownership interest or in which it has no controlling ownership
interest. In 2006, approximately 83% of its worldwide unit case volumes were produced and
distributed by bottling partners in which the company did not have any controlling interests.
As independent companies, its bottling partners, some of whom are publicly traded
companies, make their own business decisions that may not always be in line with the
company’s interests. In addition, many of its bottling partners have the right to manufacture
or distribute their own products or certain products of other beverage companies.

If Coca-Cola is unable to provide an appropriate mix of incentives to its bottling partners,

then the partners may take actions that, while maximizing their own short-term profits, may
be detrimental to Coca-Cola. These bottlers may devote more resources to business
opportunities or products other than those beneficial for Coca-Cola. Such actions could, in
the long run, have an adverse effect on Coca-Cola’s profitability.
In addition, loss of one or more of its major customers by any one of its major bottling
partners could indirectly affect Coca-Cola’s business results. Such dependence on third

Page 25
parties is a weak link in Coca-Cola’s operations and increases the company’s business risks.

 SLIGGISH GROWTH OF CARBONATED BEVERAGES

US consumers have started to look for greater variety in their drinks and are becoming
increasingly health conscious. This has led to a decrease in the consumption of carbonated
and other sweetened beverages in the US. The US carbonated soft drinks market generated
total revenues of $63.9 billion in 2005, this representing a compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of only 0.2% for the five-year period spanning 2001-2005. The performance of the
market is forecast to decelerate, with an anticipated compound annual rate of change (CAGR)
of -0.3% for the five-year period 2005-2010 expected to drive the market to a value of $62.9
billion by the end of 2010.

Moreover in the recent years, beverage companies such as Coca-Cola have been criticized for
selling carbonated beverages with high amounts of sugar and unacceptable levels of
dangerous chemical content, and have been implicated for facilitating poor diet and
increasing childhood obesity. Moreover, the US is the company’s core market. Coca-Cola
already expects its performance in the region to be sluggish during 2007. Coca-Cola’s
revenues could be adversely affected by a slowdown in the US carbonated beverage market.

Page 26
Coca-Cola India was the leading soft drink brand in India till 1977 when it was forced to
close down its operation by a socialist government in the drive for self sufficiency. After 16
years of absence, coca cola returned to India and witnessed a different culture and economic
platform. During their absence, Parle brothers introduced a new type of cola called THUMS
UP. Along with, they also formulated a lemon flavoured drink, LIMCA, and mango
flavoured, MAAZA. In 1993, coca cola bought the whole Parle Brother operation, in a hope
to beat the main competitor (Pepsi). They presumed that with the tried and tested products of
Parle they will be able to regain their throne in the Indian soft drink market. Pepsi having a 6
year head start helped revive the demand for global cola but it was not easy for the soft drink
giant (coca cola) to return to India. Pepsi put more focus on the youth of the country in their
advertisements but coca cola tried influencing Indians with the ‘American’ way of life, which
turned out to be a mistake.

Coca-Cola invested heavily in India for the first five years, which got them credit of being
one of the biggest investor in the country; however, their sales figures were not so
impressive. Hence, they had to re-think their market strategies. Coca-Cola learned from
Hindustan Lever that reducing their will result in more turnover, hence leading to profit. They
launched an extensive market research in India. They ascertained that in India 3 As must be
applied; Affordability, Availability and Acceptability. Coca-Cola learnt that they were
competing with local drinks such as “Nimbu Pani”, “Narial Pani”, “Lassi” etc. and reached to
a conclusion that competitive pricing was unavoidable. Since then they introduced a 200 ml
glass bottle for Rs.5.

Page 27
Further, they had different advertising campaigns for different regions of the country. In the
southern part, their strategy was to make Bollywood or Tamil stars to endorse their products.
In various regions they tried portraying coca cola products with different regional food
products. One of the most famous ad campaigns in India was ‘Thanda Matlab Coca-Cola’;
they featured the same quote with different regional entities.

Presently, Coca-Cola is the biggest brand in soft drinks and is way ahead in market share i.e.
60% in Carbonated Soft drinks Segment, 36% in Fruit drinks Segment, 33% in Packaged
water Segment, compared to its arch rival, Pepsi. Diversifying their product range and having
a competitive pricing policy, they have regained their throne. With virtually all the goods and
services required to produce and market Coca-Cola being made in India, the business system
of the Company directly employs approximately 6,000 people, and indirectly creates
employment for more than 125,000 people in related industries through its vast procurement,
supply, and distribution System.

The Indian operations comprises of 50 bottling operations, 25 owned by the Company, with
another 25 being owned by franchisees. That apart, a network of 21 contract packers
manufactures a range of products for the Company.

On the distribution front, 10-tonne trucks – open bay three-wheelers that can navigate the
narrow alleyways of Indian cities – constantly keep our brands available in every nook and
corner of the Country’s remotest areas.

PRODUCTS OF COCA-COLA INDIA

COCA-COLA:-

In India Coca-Cola was leading soft drink till 1977 when Government policies necessitated
its departure. Coca-Cola made its return to the country in 1993 and made significant
investments to ensure that the beverage is available to more and more people, even in remote
and inaccessible parts of the nation.

Page 28
Over the past fourteen years has enthralled consumers in India by connecting with passions of
India – Cricket, movies, music & food. Coca-Cola’s advertising campaigns “Jo Chaho Ho
Jaye” & “Life Ho Toh Aise” were very popular & had entered youths vocabulary. In
2002.Coca-Cola launched its iconic campaign “Thanda Matlab Coca-Cola” which sky
rocketed the brand to make it India’s favourite soft drink brand.

GLASS PET CAN FOUNTAIN

200ml, 300ml, 500ml, 1.5L, 2L, 330 ml VARIOUS SIZES

500ml, 1000ml 2.25L, 500ml, 100ml

Table - 1.0

LIMCA:-

Limca was introduced in 1971 in India. Limca has remained unchallenged as the No.1
sparkling drink in the cloudy lemon segment. The success formula is the sharp fizz and
lemoni bite combined with the single minded proposition of the brand as the provider of
“Freshness”.

Limca can cast a tangy refreshing spell on anyone, anywhere. Derived from “Nimbu” +
“Jaise” hence Lime Sa, Limca has lived up to its promises of refreshment and has been the
original thirst choice of millions of customers for over 3 decades.

GLASS PET CAN FOUNTAIN

200ml, 300ml, 500ml, 1.5L, 2L, 330 ml VARIOUS SIZES

500ml, 1000ml 2.25L, 500ml, 100ml

Table - 1.1

Page 29
 THUMS UP:-

Thums up is a leading sparkling soft drink and most trusted brand in India. Originally
introduced in 1977, Thums up was acquires by The Coca-Cola Company in 1993. Thums up
is known for its strong, fizzy taste and it confident, mature and uniquely masculine attitude.
This brand clearly seeks to separate the men from the boys.

GLASS PET CAN FOUNTAIN

200ml, 300ml, 500ml, 1.5L, 2L, 330 ml VARIOUS SIZES

500ml, 1000ml 2.25L, 500ml, 100ml

Table - 1.2

SPRITE:-

Sprite a global leader in the lemon lime category is the second largest sparkling beverage
brand in India. Launched in 1999, Sprite with its cut-thru perspective has managed to be a
true teen icon.

RGB PET CAN FOUNTAIN

200ml, 300ml 500ml, 600ml, 330 ml VARIOUS SIZES

1250ml, 1500ml,
2000ml, 2250ml

Table – 1.3

Page 30
 FANTA:-

Fanta entered the Indian market in the year 1993. Over the years Fanta has occupied a strong
market place and is identifies as “The Fun Catalyst”. Perceived as a fun youth brand, Fanta
stands for its vibrant colour, tempting taste and tingling bubbles that not just uplifts feelings
but also helps free spirit thus encouraging one to indulge in the moment. This positive
imagery is associated with happy, cheerful and special times with friends.

GLASS PET CAN FOUNTAIN

200ml, 300ml 500ml, 1.5L, 2L, 330 ml VARIOUS SIZES

2.25L, 500ml, 100ml

Table – 1.4

MINUTE MAID PULPY ORANGE:-

The history of the Minute Maid brand goes as far back as 1945 when the Florida Food
Corporation developed orange juice powder. The company developed a process that
eliminated 80% of the water in the orange juice, forming a frozen concentrate that when
reconstitute created orange juice. They branded it Minute Maid a name connoting the
convenience and the ease of preparation. Minute Maid thus moved from a powdered
concentrate to the first ever orange juice from concentrate.

The launch of Minute Maid in India (started with the south of the country) is aimed to further
extend the leadership of Coca-Cola in India in the juice drink category.

Available in 3 PET pack sizes i.e. 400ml, 1 litre, 1.25 litres.

Page 31
 MAAZA:-

Maaza was introduced in late 1970’s. Maaza has today come to symbolise the very spirit of
mangoes. Universally loved for its taste, colour, thickness and wholesome properties, Maaza
is the mango lover’s first choice.

RGB PET POCKET MAAZA

200ml, 250ml 250ml, 600ml, 1.2L 200ml

Table – 1.5

KINLEY:-

The importance of water can never be understated, Particularly in a nation such as India
where water governs the lives of the millions, be it as a part of everyday ritual or as the
monsoon which gives life to the sub continent. Kinley water comes with the assurance of
safety from the Coca-Cola Company.

Available in PET 500ml and 1000ml.

GEORGIA GOLD COFFEE:-

Georgia coffee was introduced in India in 2004. The Georgia gold range of Tea and coffee
beverages is the perfect solution for office and restaurant needs. Today Georgia coffee is
available at Quick-Service Restaurants, Airports, Cinemas and in Corporates across all major
metros in India.

HOT BEVERAGES Espresso, Americano, Cappuccino, Caffe Latte, Mochaccino,

Hot Chocolate, Cardamon Tea.
COLD BEVERAGES Ice Teas, Cold Coffee.

Page 32
 5. RESEARCH

METHODOLOGY

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

 The main objective of the project is to analyze and study in efficient way the
current position of Coca- Cola Company.

 To perform PESTLE and SWOT analysis of Coca-cola globally as well as

locally. This would help us identify areas of potential growth.

 The study was aimed to perform Market Analysis of Coca-Cola Company & find
out different factors effecting the growth of Coca-Cola.

Page 40
  Another objective of the study was to perform Competitive analysis between Coca-
Cola and its competitors.

 To understand the reasons behind the purchase of Coca-Cola products.

SCOPE OF THE STUDY:-

This study basically tries to discover the current position of Coca-cola in the market. It
also tries to discover the preferences of the customers when posed with a choice between
Coca-Cola and Pepsi. It is primarily directed to the general public but was done only in
New Delhi, Noida and Greater Noida

RESEARCH DESIGN
A research design is the specification of methods and procedures for acquiring the needed
information. It is overall operational pattern or framework of the project that stipulates what
information is to be collected from which source by what procedure.

There are three types of objectives in a marketing research project:-

• Exploratory Research.
• Descriptive Research.
• Casual Research.

1. Exploratory Research:-

The objective of exploratory research is to gather preliminary information that will help
define problems and suggest hypothesis.

2. Descriptive Research:-

The objective of descriptive research is to describe things, such as the market potential for
a product or the demographics and attitudes of consumers who buy the product.

3. Casual Research:-

The objective of casual research is to test hypothesis about casual and effect relationships.

Page 41
Based on the above definitions it can be established that this study is a Descriptive Research
as the attitudes of the customers who buy the products have been stated. Through this study
we are trying to analyze the various factors that may be responsible for the preference of
Coca-Cola products.

SOURCES OF DATA

The data has been collected from both primary as well as secondary sources.

SECONDARY DATA:-

It is defined as the data collected earlier for a purpose other than one currently being pursued.

As a researcher I have scanned lot of sources to get an access to secondary data which have
formed a reference base to compare the research findings. Secondary data in this study has
provided an insight and forms an outline for the core objectives established.

The various sources of secondary data used for this study are:-

 News papers.
 Magazines.
 Text books.
 Marketing reports of the company.
 Internet.

PRIMARY DATA:-

The primary data has been collected simultaneously along with secondary data for
meeting the established objectives to provide the solution for the problem identified in
this study.

Page 42
The methods that have been used to collect the primary data are:-

 Questionnaire.
 Personal Interview.

RESEARCH MEASURING TOOLS & TECHNIQUES

The primary tool for the data collection used in this study is the respondent’s response to the
questionnaire given to them. The various research measuring tools used are:-

 Questionnaire.
 Personal interview.
 Tables.
 Percentages.
 Pie-charts.
 Bar-charts.
 Column charts.

SAMPLING DESIGN

An integral component of a research design is the sampling plan. Especially it addresses three
questions: Whom to survey (sample Unit), how many to survey (Sample Size) and how to
select them (sampling Procedure). Making the census study of the entire universe will be
impossible on the account of limitations of time and money. Hence sampling becomes
inevitable. A sample is only his portion of population. Properly done, sampling produces
representative data of the entire population.

SAMPLE SIZE:-

i. Through questionnaire – 150 respondents.

ii. Through personal interview – 27 respondents.

Page 43
SAMPLING TOOL:-

Questionnaire was used as a main tool for the collection of data, mainly because it gives the
chance for timely feedback from respondents. Moreover respondents feel free to disclose all
necessary detail while filling up a questionnaire. Respondents seeking any clarification can
easily be sorted out through tool.

Sampling Tools Respondents Number

Questionnaire Customers 150
Personal Interview Customers 27
Total 177
Table – 1.7

FIELD WORK:-

The study was conducted in New Delhi, Noida and Greater Noida.

 The questionnaires were given to the respondents to fill in order to get their feedback.
 Questions were read out to the respondents and the answers were noted.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:-

The main purpose of this study is get idea about the preference of the customers towards
various Coca-Cola products. But there are certain factors which affects this study they are as
follow:

 Since the sampling procedure was judgmental, the sample selected may not be true
representative of the population.

 Economic and market conditions are very unpredictable (Present and future).

 The project duration is limited to 4 weeks so it limits the area of study.

Page 44
 6.
DATA
ANALYSIS

Respondents based on age group

180
160
Number of respondents

140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Below 20 20-30 30-40 40-50 above 50
Number of respondents 10 159 6 1 1

Fig 2.4

Page 45
 Respondents based on gender

37%

Male
63%
Female

Fig 2.5

AGE GROUP & GENDER:

From Fig 2.4, we can comprehend that 90% of total respondents belong to the age group of
20-30. This is because most of the consumers that prefer or consume Coca-Cola products
belong to this age group. About 6% belong to age group below 20 and 3% belong to age
group of 30-40.Form Fig 2.5, we come to know that the gender ratio of the total respondents
is almost 2:1 (male: female).

Frequency of soft drink consumption

50
40
30
20 Series1
10
0
Once a Twice a Thrice a Everyday Rarely
week week week

Fig 2.6

Page 46
 Weekly expenditure of coca-
cola products (INR)
4% 3%
12%
50-100
100-150
81% 150-200
Above 200

Fig 2.7

SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION & EXPENDITURE:

From Fig 2.6, we interpret that about 48% of the total respondents consume soft drinks rarely
or once a week. About 35% respondents consume soft drinks twice or thrice a week and only
18% consumes soft drinks every day.

From Fig 2.7, we interpret that about 81% of the respondents spend only Rs. 50-100 a week
on Coca-Cola products, which is very low as compared to the global scenario. This creates a
potential growth market for Coca-Cola India. About 12% spends from 100-150 a week & 7%
spend above 150.

Page 47
 Purchasing Portal Preference

120
S
100 e
80 r
i
60 e
40 s
1
20
0
Supermarkets Retails Vendor Pubs & Multiplexes
Machines Restaurant

Vendor Pubs &

Supermarkets Retails Multiplexes
Machines Restaurant
Series1 26 103 8 20 20

Fig 2.8

PURCHASING PORTAL PREFERENCE:

From the above data, we have ascertained that preferred portal for purchase of Coca-Cola
products is the retail shops i.e. 58%. This is probably because not all communities in India
have supermarkets and other purchasing channels present nearby, whereas, we can find retail
shops in every corner.19% prefer to purchase from Supermarkets and Vendor machines. 23%
prefer to purchase from Pubs, Restaurants and Multiplexes.

Page 48
 Occasions/Reasons for consumption

Just like that

Parties

Cinemas

Picnics

Festivals

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Festivals Picnics Cinemas Parties Just like that

Series1 3 4 26 40 104
Number of respondents

Fig 2.9

REASON FOR CONSUMPTION:

From this graph, we infer that there is no specific occasion why people purchase Coca-Cola
products. Although some of the advertising campaigns target special occasion or festivals.
From Fig 2.9 it is concluded that 59% respondents purchase Coca-Cola without any specific
reason. About 23% purchase for the purpose of parties, 15% purchase while watching movies
in the cinemas and only about 4% purchase during festivals and for picnic purposes.

Page 49
 Soft drink preference

80
70 S
Number of responses

60 e
50 r
40 i
e
30
s
20 1
10
0
Coca-Cola Pepsi Other products Other products Other drinks
of Coca-Cola of Pepsi

Other products of Other products of

Coca-Cola Pepsi Other drinks
Coca-Cola Pepsi
Series1 72 34 52 7 12

Fig 2.10

SOFT DRINK PREFERENCE:

From the above graph we interpret that about 70% of the respondents, prefer consuming
Coca-Cola product over Pepsi and other drinks. This clearly states why Coca-Cola is market
leader with almost 60% of market share. 23% prefer Pepsi Products and only 75 prefer other
drinks.

Page 50
 7.

SUGGESTIONS

AND

CONCLUSION

Page 51
 SUGGESTIONS
The suggestions made in this section are based on the market study conducted as part of
“Coca-Cola India”. The suggestions are arranged in order of priority, highest first.

 Perform a detail demand survey at regular interval to know about the unique needs
and requirements of the customer.

 The company should make hindrance free arrangement for its customers/retailers to
make any feedback or suggestions as and when they feel.

 The company should focus to bring some more flavors like health drinks and other
low-calorie offerings. Coca-Cola India can also introduce some fruit based drinks, as
it has already entered the energy drink arena with “Burn”.

 Coca-Cola’s distribution channel is mostly through retail. Whereas the competitors

also concentrates more on the multiplexes, pubs and restaurants. Coca-Cola should try
to increase their distribution in these areas.

 The company must keep a watch on its primary competitors in market in order to be
able to compete with them.

 The company should use new attractive system of word of mouth advertisement to
keep alive the general awareness in the whole market as a whole.

 The company should be always in a position to receive continuous feedback and

suggestions from its customers/ consumers as well as from the market and try to
solve it without any delay to establish its own good credibility.

 A strong watch should be kept on distributors so that the goodwill of the BRAND
doesn’t get affected.

Page 52
 CONCLUSION

Though there were certain limitations in the study that was conducted. The sample allowed
for some conclusions to be drawn on the basis of analysis that was done on the data collected.

The data has clearly indicated that Coca-Cola products are more popular than the products
of Pepsi mainly because of its TASTE, BRAND NAME, INNOVATIVENESS and
AVAILABILITY, thus it should focus on good taste so that it can capture the major part of
the market. The study also indicated that the consumers are satisfied with the Coca-Cola
products and purchase them without any specific occasions.

In today’s scenario, customer is the king because he has got various choices around him. If
you are not capable of providing him the desired result he will definitely switch over to the
other provider. Therefore to survive in this cutthroat competition, you need to be the best.
Customer is no more loyal in today’s scenario, so you need to be always on your toes.

Page 53
 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:

 Marketing Management – Kotler Philip.

 Research Methodology – Kothari.

WEBSITES:

 www.thecoca-colacompany.com
 www.news.bbc.co.uk
 www.india-server.com
 www.magindia.com
 www.coca-colaindia.com
 www.wikiinvest.com
 www.open2.net

OTHERS

 Annual report of Coca-Cola 2008.

 Annual report of Coca-Cola 2009.

Page 54
 9. QUESTIONNAIRE

 NAME:
..............................................................................
 GENDER:
a) Male b) Female

 Do you drink Soft drinks?

a) Yes
b) No

 How often do you have soft drinks per week?

a) Once a week
b) Twice a week
c) Thrice a week
d) Everyday
e) Rarely

 What drink comes to your mind when you think of soft drinks?
a) Coca-Cola
b) Pepsi
c) Other products of Coca-Cola
d) Other products of Pepsi
e) Other drinks

 What quantity do you usually prefer to buy?

a) 200-250 ml Glass bottle
b) 300 ml Can
c) 500 ml Pet bottle
d) 1 litre
e) 2 litre

 What do you feel about Coca-Cola product range?

a) Excellent
b) Good
c) Satisfactory
d) Below Satisfactory
e) Bad

Page 55
  What occasions do you prefer to buy Coca-Cola products?
a) Festivals
b) Picnics
c) Parties
d) Cinemas
e) Just like that

 What is your most preferred channel for purchasing Coca-Cola products?

a) Super markets
b) Retails
c) Vendor Machines
d) Pubs & Restaurants
e) Multiplexes

 How much do you spend on Coca-Cola products per week?

a) 50-100
b) 100-150
c) 150-200
d) Above 200

 Put (X) mark in which ever you feel is appropriate?

Parameters / Product Coca-Cola Products Pepsi Products
1) Branding
2) Quality
3) Price
4) Taste
5) Availability
6) Satisfaction

 What kind of products do you want Coca-Cola to introduce in the future?

a) Fizzy Drinks
b) Fruit Drinks
c) Energy Drinks
d) Alcoholic Drinks

...............................................................................................................

Thank you!

Page 56
 4.
BRAND
LOYALTY
PROGRAMMES
OF COCA-COLA

Page 33
4. BRAND LOYALTY PROGRAMMES OF COCA-COLA

• Channel Programme Expansion And Effectiveness of KKB and

Dinner's club

▶ Channel expansion is basically expanding your distribution

networks to be used as an effective tool to increase your business.

▶ Advantages to broader distribution channel includes:

1.Heftier profits: Selling to more customers can raise revenues , cuts

per-unit cost and boost the bottom line.

2. Less risk: If you are selling through one channel you've put all your
eggs in one basket. Selling through multiple channels spreads risk.

3. Brand building: Making products available in more locations will

raise consumer awareness of your offerings.

Page 34
 KKB (khushiyon ka bandhan)

▶ Khushiyon Ka Bandhan" (KKB) is a unique loyalty

Program designed for Retailers selling products
manufactured and marketed by Hindustan Coca-Cola
Beverages Pvt Ltd (HCCBPL).

▶ This is an engagement program designed to strengthen

bond with retailers

▶ Retailers can earn Loyalty points on 5 criteria: 29°C AQI

▶ Purchase points can be earned on purchase of juice and

sparking products only.

Page 35
Flow chart showing how rewards
program works :

Page 36
 DINNER's CLUB

DINNER's CLUB is also a loyalty program just like

KKB. But this program is designed for restaurant
owners or we can say Eat and drink points owners.
Rest all the reward carningpoints is same as in case
of KKB and after achieving their targets they get
gifts like pen drive, keychain, mask, carphones etc.
It is also known as E & D Rewards.

Page 37
 OBSERVATIONS

▶ KKB and Dinner’s club ,both the loyalty programs were introduced
in 2018 for retailers and till now both these programs have increased
the sales of Coca Cola drinks.
▶ After Collecting all the data from market related to KKB and
Dinner’s club we have concluded the following observations

• Total Percentage of targets achieved by grocery owners-41%

• Total Percentage of kits received- 36%
• Total Percentage of kits not received-64%

1. According to the percentage we are having, around 41% of

grocery owners have completed their target and out of
which 36% have received their kits which is a very small
Number.
2. After having a one to one conversation with the grocery
owners we concluded the following issues they are facing
the KKB program:

a. They are not getting the Sms on time.

b. Even if they have completed their targets, still they are
receiving the Sms regarding the unachieved target.
c. Some grocery owners are facing the problem related to
cash while using ATM Kit
d. Some of them are not communicated properly about
the program related information
e. Some of them are not satisfied with the other services
provided by coca cola.

Page 38
 SUGGESTIONS

The real market experience we got after getting ourselves

involved in one to one communication with the store
owners and that one to one conversation with them made
us realize the fact that though these loyalty programs
might have increased the sales of coca cola drinks but
haven’t helped in maintaining the customer relationship
with the company.
Instead of introducing new schemes for increasing the
sales of drinks, company should work upon the healthy
customer relation bond, as its more helpful for long-term
relation.
What else we can earn if our customers are fully satisfied
with our services and if we failed to do so, we will soon
start losing our customers.

Page 39