Voltage Profile Improvement For Distributed Wind Generation Using D-STATCOM
Voltage Profile Improvement For Distributed Wind Generation Using D-STATCOM
1 2 3 4 5 6
15 14 13 12
11 10 9 8 7
Fig. 1. Single line diagram of Modified Kumamoto 15-bus distribution system [16]
modelling can satisfactorily reproduce the dynamic the direct and quadrature axis transient voltages respectively,
characteristics of WTGS. The drive train is attached to the ids and iqs are the direct and quadrature axis currents
wind turbine converts the aerodynamic torque Tae on the
respectively, and Z s is the synchronous speed.
rotor into the torque on the low speed-shaft, which is scaled
down through the gearbox to the torque on the high-speed C. D-STATCOM
shaft. The first mass term stands for the blades, hub and low- The equivalent circuit of D-STATCOM is shown in Fig.
speed shaft, while the second mass term stands for the high The dynamics of the voltage source is governed by the
speed shaft having the inertia constants H m and H g . The charging and discharging of a large (non-ideal) capacitor.
Firing angle Įl controls active power exchange in the
shafts are interconnected by the gear ratio, N g , combined
converter as well as charge and discharge of dc capacitors and
with torsion stiffness, K s , and torsion damping, Dm and consequently dc-bus voltage ȣdcl.
The dynamics for lth STATCOM can be described by the
D g resulting in torsion angle O . The normal grid frequency following equation [9]:
is f . The dynamics of the shaft can be represented as follows P Q
Qdcl (t ) sl dcl (15)
[12], [13]: ClQ dcl Rcl Cl
1
Z m >Tae K s O DmZm @ (7) for l=1,2, . . . , p, where p is total number of D-
2H m STATCOMs, vdcl is the capacitor voltage, Cl is the dc
capacitor, RCl is the internal resistance of the capacitor, and Psl
Z g
1
2H g
>
K s O Tae D g Z g @ (8) is the power supplied by the system to the D-STATCOM to
charge the capacitor. The ac side D-STATCOM
§ · voltage El kl vdcl D l , where Įl the bus angle of the D-
1
O 2Sf ¨ Z m Z ¸ (9) STATCOM in the reduced network and kl is a constant
¨ Ng
g ¸
© ¹ associated with the inverter of the D-STATCOM.
The induction generator gets the power from the gear box The terminal voltage of D-STATCOM is measured using a
through the stiff shaft. The relationship between the transducer with first order dynamic,
mechanical torque and torsional angle is given by: Q tm Ps
Tm K s O (10) Qtm l l
K mlQ tl (16)
l
Tml
The mechanical torque depends on torsion stiffness (Ks),
torsion angle (Ȝ), rotor speed (Ȧg) etc. In this work, time
domain simulation is carried out with full non-linear model of
the wind turbine generation system considering variable
mechanical torque.
E qrc
1
Toc
>
E qrc ( X X c)ids sZ s TocE drc @ (11)
E drc
1
Toc
>
E drc ( X X c)iqs sZ s TocE qrc @ (12)
1
s Tm Te (13)
2H g
v ds jv qs Rs jX cids jiqs j E qrc jE drc (14)
Here, X c X m X r is the transient reactance, R is the
Xs s
Xm Xr
stator resistance which is assumed to be zero, X r is the rotor
reactance, X m is the magnetizing reactance, X X s X m is Fig. 2. D-STATCOM equivalent circuit [9]
the rotor open circuit reactance, Toc is transient open circuit
time constant, Tm is the mechanical torque, s is the slip,
Te E drc ids E qrc iqs is the electrical torque, Edrc and Eqrc are
4
where, Q tm l
is the sensor output, Qt l
is the voltage at the and participation factors, it is clear that it is related to reactive
power mismatch.
connection point of D-STATCOM, K ml is a constant, and
TABLEI
Tml is the time constant of the voltage transducer. EIGENVALUES OF DOMINATING MODES
Modes Eigenvalues
1.000 Without Wind Generator 18 -0.16229
With Wind Generator 19 -0.0000113
0.995
TABLE II
Voltage (pu)
PARTICIPATION FACTORS
0.990
Modes Participation factors
0.980 1.1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1.0
Node
0.9
Fig. 3. Nodal voltages without and with distributed wind
Voltage (pu)
30 0.7
20
0.6
10
0
0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
-10 Time (sec)
-20 Fig. 5. Voltage profile of bus 10 with 20% wind penetration
-30
1.1
-40
1.0
VI. APPENDIX
APPENDIX A
0.9 TABLE III
Voltage (pu)
Fig. 7. Voltage profile of bus 10 with 80% wind penetration 9 10 0.00367 0.01694 0.00350 0.02800 0.0029
10 11 0.00900 0.041575 0.00200 0.21700 0.0022
3 12 0.02750 0.127043 0.00000 0.01320 0.0014
1.1
12 13 0.03150 0.081405 0.00000 0.00290 0.0003
13 14 0.03965 0.102984 0.00000 0.01610 0.0016
1.0
14 15 0.01061 0.004153 0.00000 0.01390 0.0014
0.9
Bus voltage=6.6 kV, Base MVA= 10 MVA
Voltage (pu)
0.8 APPENDIX B
GENERATOR AND INDUCTION MOTOR PARAMETERS
Without Capacitor or D-STATCOM
0.7 With Shunt Capacitor
The machine parameters used for the system are given below:
With D-STATCOM
Synchronous generator parameters:
0.6
X d =0.1, X q =0.69 X dc =0.031, Tdc0 =5s, H=0.04s, D=2
Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Parameters:
0.5
KA = 5, Tr = 0.1
Induction generator parameters:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Power: 2 MW, Rs=0.0121 pu
Time (sec) Voltage: 690 V, Xs=0.0742 pu
Fig. 8. Voltage profile of bus 10 for 80% wind penetration Frequency, f =50 Hz , Xm=2.7626 pu
Self-damping: 0.008 pu, Rr=0.008 pu
without and with compensating devices Rated slip: 0.02, Xr=0.1761 pu
Two mass model Parameters:
To improve the voltage profile a shunt capacitor is Hm=2.6 s, Hg=0.22 s, Dm=3 pu, Ks=141 pu, Gearbox ratio: 23.75
connected at bus 10 with 80% wind penetration. From Fig. 8, D-STATCOM Parameters:
Capacity: 5 MVA
it is seen that still there exists a large voltage dip in the voltage C=300ȝF
profile. A D-STATCOM is connected at bus 10 to make a RC=0.01 pu
comparison with the performance of shunt capacitor. Fig. 8
shows the superiority of D-STATCOM to enhance the voltage VII. REFERENCES
compared to shunt capacitor. Similar results are true for [1] W. Freitas, J.C.M. Vieira, A. Morelato, L.C.P. da Silva, V.F. da Costa,
different level of wind penetration also. and F.A.B. Lemos, “Comparative analysis between synchronous and
induction machines for distributed generation applications,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 301–311, 2006.
6
[2] Stratis Tapanlis and Michael Wollny, “Advanced active and reactive [10] Irena Wasiak, Rozmyslaw Mienski, Ryszard Pawelek, Piotr Gburczyk,
power control for mini grids,” World Climate & Energy Event, pp.111- “Application of DSTATCOM compensators for mitigation of power
117, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009. quality disturbances in low voltage grid with distributed generation,” in
[3] B. Parsons and M. Milligan, “Grids impacts of wind power: summary of Proc. 9th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and
recent studies in the United States,” NREL/CP-500-34318, National Utilisation, 9-11 October, 2007, Barcelona.
Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2003. [11] A. R. Bergen, Voltage Stability of Electric Power Systems, New Jersey:
[4] Yi Zhang, Sadrul Ula and Yibin Zhang, “Wind power availability and Prentice-Hall, 1986.
increased capacity credit for multiple wind farms,” IEEE PES General [12] T. Ackermann, Wind Power in Power Systems, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2010. England, 2005.
[5] J. C. Boemer, M. Gibescu, W.L Kling, “Dynamic models for transient [13] M. J. Hossain, H. R. Pota, V. Ugrinovskii, and R. A. Ramos, “A novel
stability analysis of transmission and distribution systems with STATCOM control to augment LVRT capability of fixed speed wind
distributed generation: an overview,” IEEE Bucharest Power Tech generators,” in Proc. 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,
Conference, pp. 1-8, Bucharest, Romania, 2009. Shanghai, P. R. China, pp. 7843-7848, 2009.
[6] Genevieve Coath and Majid Al-Dabbagh, “Effect of Steady-State Wind [14] E. S. Abdin and W. Xu, “Control design and dynamic performance
Turbine Generator Models on Power Flow Convergence and Voltage analysis of wind turbine-induction generator unit,” IEEE Trans. on
Stability Limit,” Australasian Universities Power Engineering Energy Conversion, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 91-96, 2000.
Conference (AUPEC 2005), Tasmania, Australia, 2005. [15] C. W. Taylor, Power System Voltage Stability, New York: McGraw-Hill,
[7] Ching-Yin Lee, Li-Chieh Chen, Shao-Hong Tsai, Wen-Tsan Liu, and 1994.
Yuan-Kang Wu, “The Impact of SCIG Wind Farm Connecting into a [16] Fracisco M. González-Longatt, “Impact of distributed generation over
Distribution System,” Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering power losses on distribution system,” in Proc. 9th International
Conference (APPEEC 2009), pp. 1-7, China, 2009. Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation, 9-11 October,
[8] Per-Anders LÖf, David J Hill, Stefan Arnborg, and GÖran Andersson, 2007, Barcelona.
“On the analysis of long-term voltage stability,” International Journal of [17] S. Li, K. Tomsovic, and T. Hiyama, “Load following functions using
Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 229-237, 1993. distributed energy resources,” in Proc. of the IEEE PES Summer
[9] M. J. Hossain, H. R. Pota, and C. Kumble, “Decentralized robust static Meeting, vol. 3, pp. 1756 – 1761, 16-20 July 2000, Seattle, WA , USA.
synchronous compensator control for wind farms to augment dynamic
transfer capability,” Journal of renewable and sustainable energy, vol.
2, , pp. 022701-20, 2010.