Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research design, locale of the study,
respondents of the study, data gathering instrument, validity and
reliability of the research instrument, data gathering procedure,
analytical schemes, and statistical tools.
Research Design
The design that will be used in this study is descriptive-
correlational which is appropriate in determining the teachers’
performance as influenced by the challenges encountered and the coping
mechanisms they were adapting. Descriptive correlational design aims to
describe the relationship between the selected demographic profile of the
respondents and the extent of challenges and level of coping mechanisms
of newly hired teachers assigned in far-flung schools.
Descriptive research (Creswell, 2017) is fact-finding with adequate
interpretation. Beyond simply data gathering, it involves analyzing,
classifying and tabulating data about prevailing conditions, practices,
beliefs, cause and effect relationships and then making appropriate
interpretation about such data.
It is the nature of this study to assess the condition of things in
their current state. In the same way, it delves into the relationship
among variables that are considered in the study as well as the influence
45
of one variable to another. It is within this context that the researcher
considered it most suitable to use the descriptive research design.
Locale of the Study
This study will be conducted far-flung schools in 10 Districts in
the Schools Division of Himamaylan City, Negros Occidental.
It is comprised of 38 elementary schools, 11 Secondary High
Schools and 6 Integrated Schools. The schools are situated in the
mountanious areas of the said City and Division where transportation,
teaching environement and physical facilities are the major problems
encountered by the newly-hired teachers.
The Schools Division of Himamaylan City was signed last June
2018 through the effort of the Local Government Unit and Deped
personnel in order to be seperated under the Division of Negros
Occidental. At present it was located at the Old City hall of The
Himamaylan City in front of the Himamaylan Public Plaza. There were
about 1, 200 Teachers both elementary and secondary schools in the
Division. One of the recent achievements of the Division last school year
2019-2020 when 4 elementary schools converted in to integrated shools
to cater learners specially those living in far-flung areas.
Although it was a newly built Division, it was awarded as Best in
Water Innovation in the year 2019 and Regional SBM Wins top 5.
46
Respondents of the Study
The respondents of this study will be the 70 newly-hired teachers
assigned in far-flung areas in 10 Disctrict in the Schools Division of
Himamaylan City.
Total enumeration of the newly-hired teachers as described in the
definition of terms are those teaching 3 years and below with permanent
plantilla and appointment. No sampling technique will be utilized.
Table 1
Distribution of Respondents
Population Percentage
Schools
(N) (%)
A 4 5.71
B 4 5.71
C 5 7.14
D 6 8.57
E 5 7.14
F 7 10.00
G 5 7.14
H 6 8.57
I 3 4.30
J 7 10.00
K 6 8.57
L 3 4.30
M 4 5.71
N 5 7.14
Total 70 100.00
Data Gathering Instrument
A self-made questionnaire will be instituted to gather the data
needed in this undertaking. This instrument will be subjected to the jury
47
for validation. A standardized instrument on teachers’ performance will
be used to gather the data needed. Likert Scale of 1-5 will be used to
determine the extent of challenges and the level of coping mechanisms.
The instrument is divided into two (2) parts:
Part I is the profile of the respondents which will elicit data on the
respondents’ age, civil status, highest educational attainment, and length
of service.
Part II which will elicit the data on the challenges they encountered
and coping mechsnisms. There will be 3 (three) areas that contains (10)
items each or a total of thirty (30) items for the challenges encountered
and thirty (30) items for coping mechanisms. Each Item is rated on the
scale of 1-5, with 5 interpreted as Always, 4 as Often, 3 Sometimes, 2 as
Rarely, and 1 as Almost Never.
Part III is the survey on the teachers’ performance based on the
rating stated in the Deped Order No. 2, s. 2015 to be measured as:
Oustanding- 4.500-5.000, Very Satisfactory - 3.500- 4.499, Satisfactory
- 2.500-3.499, Unsatisfactory- 2.500- 1.499, Poor- below 1.499.
Validity
The research instrument for challenges and coping mechanims
adapted with demographic profile will be subjected to validity by three
experts using the criteria of Good and Scates (1954). Cristobal (2015)
defines validity as the ability of an instrument to measure what it
purports to measure.
48
These jurors will be chosen based on their educational
qualifications, position in their organizations, and their expertise or
specialization in the field related to the research problem at hand.
The first validator is a Principal I of in the District of Cauayan II of
the Division of Negros Occidental. He graduated his Doctor of Philosophy
major in Educational Management at University of St. La Salle, Bacolod
City. A part time instructor of the project free in the said university,
panel of a defense and an ethusiast of research. Second validator is a Ph
D major in Educational Managament at University of St. La Salle,
Bacolod City. Awarded as Best Thesis in his Master’s Degree at the same
university. An expert of research and participants of BERF in the
Division of Himamaylan City. Third validator is a Ph D in Educational
Management, presently a Faculty in the College of Education, Arts and
Sciences, and an expert in Guidance and Psychology. Fourth validator is
Ph D in Educational Management, a District Supervisor in the Division of
Bacolod City and an expert in Research. The 5th validator is a Ph D in
Educational Management, a faculty member of the College of Education,
Arts and Sciences, and an expert in Research.
Likewise, suggestions from the thesis adviser and the panel
members will also be considered for the modification of the test
instrument.
To determine the validity of the research instrument, the
researcher adapted the criteria developed for the evaluation of survey
49
questionnaires set forth by Carter V. Good and Douglas E. Scates. The
interpretations were as follows: Excellent (4.04 – 5.00); Very Good (3.28 -
4.03); Good (2.52 – 3.27); Poor (2.51 – 1.76); Very Poor (1.00 – 1.75).
Reliability
Reliability refers to the consistency, accuracy, stability,
dependency, and predictability of the research instrument. A reliable
measuring devices is one which, if used for the second time, will yield the
same result as it did for the first time (Creswell, 2017).
Since the research instrument is a self-made, the reliability will be
established. To establish the reliability of the research instrument, the
Cronbach Alpha will be used. The Cronbach Alpha is used whenever the
researcher has items that are not scored simply as right or wrong
(Santos, 2016). Cronbach Alpha is a measure of internal consistency,
that is, how closely related a set of items are as a group. It is considered
to be a measure of scale reliability. A "high" value for alpha does not
imply that the measure is unidimensional. Reliability coefficient of 0.70
to 1 is considered “acceptable” in most research situations. (
Data Gathering Procedure
Before conducting the study, the researcher will make sure that all
the suggestions and recommendations of the panel members during the
pre-oral will be complied. The researcher will be conducted the validation
and reliability testing of the test questions.
50
The researcher will seek permission from the School
Heads/Principals of the public elementary and secondary schools in the
10 District in the schools Division of Himamaylan City, as well as the
Schools Division Superintendent (SDS) through the Public Schools
District Supervisor (PSDS) to undertake the study.
Upon approval, the researcher will schedule the administration of
the questionnaire in order to avoid inconvenience and unpreparedness
on the part of the respondents. Since pandemic is still existing, the
researcher will create a link so that participants will automatically send
their answer via google sheet. The test scores and other data will then be
retrieved, tallied, tabulated and interpreted.
Analytical Schemes
This study will employ three analytical schemes based on the
research objectives which are descriptive, comparative and relational.
For Objective No. 1, the descriptive analytical scheme will be
used to determine the profile of the Newly-Hired Teachers assigned in
the far-flung schools in terms of the following variables: Age, Sex, Civil
Status, and Length of Service.
For Objective No. 2, the descriptive analytical scheme will also
be used to determine the extent of challenges encountered of the
newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung schools according to
the areas: Mode of Transportation, Physical Facilities/Water and Food
Supplies and Teaching Environment/Resources
51
For Objective No. 3, the descriptive analytical scheme will
likewise be used to determine the extent of challenges encountered of
the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung schools when they
are grouped and compared according to the aforementioned variables.
For Objective 4, the descriptive analytical scheme will be utilized to
determine the level of coping mechanisms of the newly hired teachers
assigned in the far-flung schools according to the aforementioned areas?
For Objective 5, descriptive analytical scheme will be utilized to
determine the level of coping mechanisms of the newly hired teachers
assigned in the far-flung schools when they are grouped and compared
according to the aforementioned variables.
For Objective 6, descriptive analytical scheme will be utilized to
determine the level of performance of the newly-hired teachers assigned
in the far-flung schools when they are grouped according to the
aforementioned variables.
For Objective 7, the comparative analytical scheme will be utilized
to determine on whether or not significant differences in the extent of
challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers in the far-flung
schools when they are grouped and compared according to the
aforementioned variables.
For Objective 8, the comparative analytical scheme will also be
used to determine level of coping mechanisms of the newly-hired
52
teachers in the far-flung schools when they are grouped and compared
according to the aforementioned variables.
For Objective 9, the comparative analytical scheme will also be
used to determine level of performance of the newly-hired teachers
assigned in far-flung schools when they are grouped and compared
according to the aforementioned variables.
For Objective 10, the relational analytical scheme will be used to
determine on whether or not significant relationship exists between the
extent of challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers assigned in
the far-flung schools and the level of performance.
For Objective 11, the relational analytical scheme will be used to
determine on whether or not significant relationship exists between the
coping mechanisms of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung
schools and the level of performance.
Statistical Tools
The data are to be analyzed in relation to the research objectives
presented in Chapter 1.
For Objective No. 1 will use the frequency and percentage
distribution to determine the profile of the Newly-Hired Teachers
assigned in the far-flung schools in terms of the following variables: Age,
Sex, Civil Status, and Length of Service.
The frequency of a particular observation is the number of times
the observation occurs in the data. The distribution of a variable is the
53
pattern of frequencies of the observation. Frequency distributions are
portrayed as frequency tables, histograms, or polygons. Frequency
distributions can show either the actual number of observations falling
in each range or the percentage of observations. Percent distribution is a
measure of how a metric (such as total revenue) is distributed among the
component parts that make up the total (Manikandan, 2014).
For Objective No. 2 will use the mean to determine the extent of
challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the
far-flung schools according to the areas: Mode of Transportation.
Physical Facilities/Water and Food Supplies and Teaching
Environment/Resources.
According to Bruce & Bruce (2017), the most basic estimate of
location is mean, or average value. The mean is the sum of all the values
divided by a number of values. Mean, also known as arithmetic average,
is defined as the value of which we get by dividing the total of the values
of various given items in a series by the total number of items.
The following were the description of the results:
Mean Score Range Verbal Interpretations
4.50 – 5.00 Very Great Extent
3.50 – 4.49 Great Extent
2.50 – 3.49 Moderate Extent
1.50 – 2.49 Low Extent
1.00 – 1.49 Very Low Extent
54
For Objective No. 3 will also use the mean to determine the extent
of challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the
far-flung schools when they are grouped and compared according to the
aforementioned variables.
For Objective No. 4 will utilize the mean to determine the level of
coping mechanisms of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung
schools according to the aforementioned areas.
The following were the description of the results:
Mean Score Range Verbal Interpretations
4.50 – 5.00 Very High Level
3.50 – 4.49 High Level
2.50 – 3.49 Moderate Level
1.50 – 2.49 Low Level
1.00 – 1.49 Very Low Level
For Objective No. 5 will also utilize the mean to determine the level
of coping mechanisms of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-
flung schools when they are grouped and compared according to the
aforementioned variables.
For Objective No. 6 will also utilize the mean to determine the level
of performance of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung
schools when they are grouped according to the aforementioned
variables.
55
Mean Score Range Verbal Interpretations
(rearranged)
Outstanding 4.50 – 5.00
Very Satisfactory 3.40 – 4.49
Satisfactory 2.50 – 3.49
Unsatisfactory 1.50 – 2.49
Poor Below 1.49
For Objective No. 7 will employ the Mann-Whitney U test to
determine on whether or not significant differences in the extent of
challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers in the far-flung
schools when they are grouped and compared according to the
aforementioned variables.
Mann-Whitney U test is used to determine whether two
independent samples have been drawn from the same population
(Panneerselvam, 2015). Mann-Whitney U test is a non-parametric
alternative to the t-test for the difference between the two independent
means (Johnson and Cubby, 2014). It is the test that is use to compare
two population means that are not equal or equal. It is also used for
equal sample size, and to test the median of two population. If the p-
value is less than or equal to 0.05 level of significance, then reject the
null hypothesis. Accept the null hypothesis, if the p-value is greater than
0.05 level of significance.
56
For Objective No. 8 will employ the Mann-Whitney U test to
determine on whether or not significant differences in the level of coping
mechanisms of the newly-hired teachers in the far-flung schools when
they are grouped and compared according to the aforementioned
variables.
For Objective No. 9 will employ the Mann-Whitney U test to
determine on whether or not significant differences in the level of
performance of the newly-hired teachers assigned in far-flung schools
when they are grouped and compared according to the aforementioned
variables.
For Objective No. 10 will use the Spearman Rho to determine on
whether or not significant relationship exists between the extent of
challenges encountered of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-
flung schools and the level of performance.
Spearman Rho (r) is also called Spearman Rank Order Correlation
coefficient, is a non-parametric measure of strength of association that
exists between two variables measured on an ordinal scale.
The computed p-values will be interpreted using the following
guide:
a. Significant if p-value is less than or equal to 0.05 level of
significance.
b. Not significant if p-value is more than 0.05 level of significance.
57
For Objective No. 11 will use the Spearman Rho to determine on
whether or not significant relationship exists between the coping
mechanisms of the newly-hired teachers assigned in the far-flung
schools and the level of performance.