0% found this document useful (0 votes)
213 views2 pages

Logic Exercise: Validity & Inference

The document contains a logic exercise with 10 parts: 1) 9 arguments are given in symbolic form to determine if they are valid or invalid and explain the reasoning. 2) A multi-premise syllogism is given to derive the conclusion using rules of inference. 3) An argument is converted to symbolic form and proven valid using rules of inference. 4) The reasons are to be supplied for the proof of a given argument.

Uploaded by

Green Stone
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
213 views2 pages

Logic Exercise: Validity & Inference

The document contains a logic exercise with 10 parts: 1) 9 arguments are given in symbolic form to determine if they are valid or invalid and explain the reasoning. 2) A multi-premise syllogism is given to derive the conclusion using rules of inference. 3) An argument is converted to symbolic form and proven valid using rules of inference. 4) The reasons are to be supplied for the proof of a given argument.

Uploaded by

Green Stone
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Name1:

Name2:
Name3:
Name4:
Exercise on Logic. Write all answers on the space provided.

A. In each of the statements/arguments, do the following:


a. Write in symbols
b. Determine whether valid or not valid
c. In either case, state the inference rule or state a justification for your answer. You may also construct a truth table
as a justification.
The first number is given as a sample.

Symbols Valid/Invalid Reason/Justification


1. If I am hungry, then I will eat. H→E
I will not eat. ¬E Valid Modus Tollens
Therefore I am not hungry. ∴¬H
2. If I am hungry, then I will eat. H→E Invalid
I will eat. E
Therefore, I am hungry. ∴H
not a Tautology

3. Either I am hungry or I will eat. HvE Invalid


I am hungry. H
Therefore, I will not eat. ∴ ¬E not a Tautology

4. I am hungry. 1. H Valid
I will eat. 2. E
Therefore, I am hungry or I will eat. ∴HvE Tautology
-------------------- Reason:
3. H ^ E 1, 2 Conjunction
4. H 3 Simplification
5. H v E 4 Addition

5. If I am hungry, then I will cook. H→C Invalid


If I will cook, then I will eat. C→E
Therefore, if I will eat, then I am hungry. ∴E→H
not a Tautology
6. It is either hotter than 100 degrees today or HvP Valid Disjunctive Syllogism
the pollution is dangerous. ¬H
It is less than 100 degrees outside today. ∴P
Therefore, the pollution is dangerous.

7. Linda is an excellent swimmer. E Valid Commutative & Modus Ponens


If Linda is an excellent swimmer, then she can E→L
work as a lifeguard. ∴L
Therefore, Linda can work as a lifeguard.

8. Steve will work at a computer company this W Valid Addition


summer. ∴WvB
Therefore, this summer Steve will work at a
computer company or he will go to a beach.

9. If I work all night on this homework, then I W→A Valid Hypothetical Syllogism
can answer all the exercises. A→U
If I answer all the exercises, I will understand ∴W→U
the material.
Therefore, if I work all night on this homework,
then I will understand the material.
B. Use rules of inference to show that the hypotheses “Randy works hard,” “If Randy works hard, then he is a dull boy,”and
“If Randy is a dull boy, then he will not get the job” imply the conclusion “Randy will not get the job.”

R: “Randy works hard” D: “he is a dull boy” J: “get the job”

Proof:
Symbolic Form of the Argument Statements Reasons

1. R 4. D 2, 1 Modus Ponens
2. R → D 5. ¬J 3, 4 Modus Ponens
3. D → ¬J
∴ ¬J

C. If Raul had taken my advice (A) or had its wits about him (W), he would have cracked the code (C) and written a program
(P). If he had cracked the code, Gladys would have enrolled in CAD (G). Gladys did not enroll in CAD. Therefore, Raul did
not take my advice.
a. Convert the above argument into its symbolic form. Use the suggested letters to represent each proposition. Write
appropriate numbering.
b. Establish the validity of the above argument.

Proof:
Symbolic Form of the Argument Statements Reasons

1. (A v W) → (C ^ P) 4. ¬C 2, 3 Modus Tollens
2. C → G 5. ¬C v ¬P 4 Addition
3. ¬G 6. ¬(C ^ P) 5 De Morgan
∴ ¬A 7. ¬(A v W) 1, 6 Modus Tollens
8. ¬A ^ ¬W 7 De Morgan
9. ¬A 8 Simplification

D. Supply the reasons for each step in the proof of the argument below.

Proof:
Argument Statements Reasons
Given:
5. t 2, 3 Modus Ponens
1. (p ∧ t) →(r ∨ s)
2. p → t 6. t ∧ p 3, 5 Conjunction
3. p
4. ¬s 7. p ∧ t 6 Commutative
∴r
8. r ∨ s 1, 7 Modus Ponens

9. s ∨ r 8 Commutative

10. r 9, 4 Disjunctive Syllogism

You might also like