State full name & tutorial group in block capital
………………………………………. …………………
Modular Programme Assignment
Cover Sheet
(Assignment Only)
Please complete the form (in capital letters) and attach it securely to the front of your assignment before submitting your
assignment.
Student ID: ………………………………………………. Student ID: ……………………………………………….
Programme: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Name of module: ……………………………………………… Name of tutor: ………………………………………………
Module code:
Assignment title: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Due date & time: ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
We have read and understood the TU Dual Award Regulations on cheating, plagiarism and collusion and state that this piece of work is our own and
does not contain any unacknowledged work from any other sources.
We authorise the University to test any work submitted by me, using text comparison software, for instances of plagiarism. We understand this will
involve the University or its contractor copying my work and storing it on a database to be used in future to test work submitted by others.
Note: The attachment of this statement on any electronically submitted assignments will be deemed to have the same authority as a signed statement.
Signed: Date: ..........................................
1
DUAL AWARD PROGRAMME - ASSIGNMENT Mark*
FEEDBACK
*This mark is provisional and is
subject to moderation and approval
by the examining board
A. A feedback needs to be included with each assignment. Please complete all details in block capital clearly.
Student ID: Student ID:
Student ID: Student ID:
Student ID: Student ID:
Title of Your Award:
Module Name and Code :
Name of Tutor:
Assignment Title:
B. This section will be completed by the tutor assessing your assignment:
Key: 1. Outstanding 2. Very Good 3. Good 4. Satisfactory 5. Weak 6. Unsatisfactory
Structure 1 2 3 4 5 6
Material relevant to question Little relevance to question
Argument logically developed Unstructured/lacking continuity
Content
Accurate presentation of argument Many Inaccuracies
Application: theory/principle No application: theory/principle
Question covered in sufficient depth Superficial treatment
Originality
Evidence of creative thought Little evidence of creative thought
Style
Fluent & well written Clumsily written
Succinct writing Too repetitive
Presentation
Logical & well set out Lacking logical flow/poorly set out
Sources
Good reference of sources Inadequate range
Correct citation of references Incorrect referencing
Language
Grammatical sentences Weak grammatically
Correct spelling Much incorrect spelling
Effective/accurate use of figures and tables Use ineffective or inaccurate
Any additional comments (if there is any):
Assessed by: Date: