Authority - AFFIDAVIT V.
MOTION
Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all
DENIED.
Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits.
Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!!
Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed
affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false
affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a
false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true,
correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth
so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this
court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to
FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s
intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE
PROCESS...is it???
MORRIS V NATIONAL CASH REGISTER,
&
GROUP V FINLETTER
Defendant is likely to be the only individual, now or in
the future, who is willing and able to place a sworn
affidavit affirming the herein disclosed facts under
penalties of perjury, into the record of this case and as
such, in absence of sworn counter-affidavit signed under
the penalties of perjury regarding these same facts, laws,
caselaws and evidence, Defendant should be the only
prevailing party. Morris v National Cash Register, 44
S.W. 2d 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested
allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and
the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327
states, “Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must
be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.”