Scribd
Upload
611 views5 pages

SSPC SP5

Uploaded by

Conhydra-Acoagua Civil 1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
611 views5 pages

SSPC SP5

Uploaded by

Conhydra-Acoagua Civil 1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
ria by the 8 SSFO: The for J 21 085839 2005, 'SSPC-SP SINACE No. 1 September 1, 2000, Joint Surface Preparation Standard SSPC-SP 5/NACE NO. 1 White Metal Blast Cleaning This SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings and NACE International standard represents a consensus of those Individual members who have reviewed this dacu- ment, its scope and provisions. Its acceptance does not in any respect preclude anyone, having adopted the standard for not. from manutacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, of procedures notin conformance with this standard. Nothing contained in this standard is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise te manufacture, sell, or use in connection with any method, apparatus, or product covered by Letters Patent, or as indemnitying or protecting anyone against lability for in- ‘ringement of Letters Patent. This standard represents minimum requicements and should in no way be interpreted ‘a8 8 estriction on the use of better procedures or materials, Neither is this standard intended to apply in all cases felating tothe subject. Unpredictable circumstances may negate the usefulness ofthis standard in specific instances. SSPC and NACE assume no responsibilty for the interpre- tation or use of this standard by other parties and accept responsibility for only hose official interpretations issued by SSPC or NAGE in accordance with their respective govern- ing procedures and policies, which preclude the issuance of interpretations by individual volunteers, Users of this standard are responsible for reviewing appropriate health, safety. and regulatory documents ang for determining their applicability in relation to this standara prior tots use, This SSPOINACE standard may not neces- sarily address all potential health and safety problems or environmental hazards associated with the use of materials, ‘equipment andor operations detalied or relerred to within ‘his standard, Users this standard ate also response for establishing appropriate health, satety, and environmental protection practices, in consultation with appropriate regu- latory authorities, necessary, to achieve compliance with ‘any existing applicable regulatory requirements prior to the use of this standard, CAUTIONARY NOTICE: SSPCINACE standards are subject to periodic review and may be revised or withdrawn al any time without prior notice. SSPC and NACE require that action be taken fo reaffirm, revise, of withdraw this standard no later than five years trom the date of initial publication. The user is cautioned to obtain the latest edition. Purchasers may receive current information on all standards and other publications by contacting the organi zations al the addresses below: city or Protective Comings 55 NACE International P.O, Box 218340 Houston, TX 77218-8340 (telephone +1 281/228-6200) ESSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings 40 24th Street, Sith Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (telephone +1 412/281-2331) Foreword This joint standard covers the use of blast cleaning abrasives to achieve a defined degree of cleaning of steel ‘surfaces prior to the application of a protective coating or lining system. This standatdis intended for use by coating of lining specifiers, applicators, inspectors, or others whose responsibilty it may be to define a siandard degree of surface cleanliness. The focus ofthis standards white metal blast cleaning. Near-white metal blast cleaning, commercial blast cleaning, Industrial blast cleaning and beush-off blast cleaning are ‘addressed in separate standards. ‘White metal bast cleaning provides a greater degree of Cleaning than near-white blast cleaning (SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2) ‘The difference between a white metal blast and a near- white blast is that a white metal blast removes all of the coating, mill scale, rust, oxides, corrosion products, and ther foreign matter trom the surface. Near-white blasting allows light shadows, slight streaks, or minar discolorations caused by stains of rust, stains of mill cale, of staing of previously applied coating to remain on no more than 5 percent of each unit area of surface This joint standard was prepared by the SSPC/NACE Task Group A on Surface Preparation by Abrasive Blast Cleaning. This oint Task Group includes members of both the SSPC Surface Preparation Committee and the NACE Unit Committee T-8G on Surtace Preparation 1. General 1.1 This joint standard covers the requirements for white metal blast cleaning of unpainted or painted steel surfaces by the use of abrasives. These requirements Include the end condition of the surface and materials and procedures necessary to achieve and verity he end condi tion SSPC-SP SINACE No.1 September 1, 2000, 1.2. The mandatory requirements are described in Sections 1 to 9 as follows: ‘Section 1 General Section 2 Definition Sections References Section 4 Procedures Before Blast Cleaning ‘Section 5 Blast Cleaning Methods and Operation Section 6 Blast Cleaning Abrasives Section 7 Procedures Following Bast Cleaning and Immediately Prior to Coating Section & Inspection Section 8 Safety and Environmental Requirements NOTE: Section 10, "Comments and Appendix A, “Explana: {ory Notes” are not mandatory requirements of this sian- dard, 2. Definition 2.1 A.white metal blast cleaned surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free ofall visible oll grease, dust, din, mill scale, rust, coating, oxides, corrosion prod- ucts, and other foreign matter 2.2. Acceptable variations in appearance that do not affect surface cleanliness as detined in Section 2.7 include |, original surface condi- tion, thickness of the steel, weld metal, mill or fabrication ‘marks, heat treating, heat alfected zones, blasting abra variations caused by type of ‘ives, and differences due to blasting technique. 2.3 When a coating is specified, the surface shall be sultable for tho specitiod coating roughened to a doar system, 24 Immediately prior to coating application, the entice surface shall comply with the degree of cleaning specitied herein. 2.8 SSPC-VIS 1-89 may be specitied to supplementthe ‘written definition. In any dispute, the written standards shall take precedence over Visual standards and comparators. Adgtional information on visual standards and comparators {s available in Section A. of Aapendix A, 3. References 3.1. The documents relerenced in this standard are listed in Section 3.4 32. The latest issue, revision, or amendment of the ‘oforonced standards inettect onthe date of invitation to bid ‘shall govern unless otherwise specie. righ by te 4 SSPE: Te Sac for tect Comings Mon Jal 2108-5357 2003 56 3.3 theres aconflct between the requirements ot any of the cited reference standards and this standard, the requirements ofthis standard shall preva, 3.4 S$PC: The Society For Protective Coatings Stan- dards: ‘AB1 Mineral and Slag Abrasives AB2 Cleanliness of Recycled Ferrous Metalic Abrasives AB3 Newly Manufactured or Re-Manutactured Steel Abrasives PA Guide 9 A Guide to Safety in Paint Application spt Solvent Cleaning VIS1 Visual Standardtor Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel 4, Procedures Before Blast Cleaning 4.1 Belore blast cleaning, visible deposits of ol, grease, or other contaminants shall be removed in accordance with 'S8PC-SP 1 or other agreed upon methods, 4.2 Before biast cleaning, surface imperfections such ‘as sharp fins, sharp edges, weld spatter, or burning slag should be removed trom the surface to the extent required by the procurement documents (project specification). Ad- ditional information on surtace impertections is available in Section A. of Appendix A 4.3 ta visual standard or comparator is specified to supplement the writen standard, the condition ofthe steel prior to blast cleaning should be determined before the blasting commences, Additional information on visual stan- dards and comparators is available in Section A.4 of Appen- dic A 5. Blast Cleaning Methods and Operation 6.1 Clean, dry compressed air shall be usedfor nozzle basting. Moisture separators, oll separators, traps, or other equipment may be necessary to achieve this requirement. 5.2 Anyot the following methods of surface preparation may be usedto achieve awhite metal abrasive blastcleaned surface: 5.2.1 Dry abrasive blasting using compressed air, blast nozzles, and abrasive, 5.2.2 Dry abrasive blasting using a closed-oycle, recit= culating abrasive system with compressed air, blast nozzle, {and abrasive, with or without vacuum for dust and abrasive recovery, 523. Dry abrasive blasting using a closed cycle, recirculating abrasive system with centitugal wheels and abrasive. 5.3 Other methods of surtace preparation (such as wet abrasive blasting) may be used to achieve a white metal blast cleaned surface by mutual agreement between those responsible for performing the work and these responsible {or establishing the requirements. NOTE: Information on the use of inhibitors to prevent the formation of rust imme- diately after wet blast cleaning is contained in Section A.9 of ‘Appendix A. 6. Blast Cleaning Abrasives 6.1 The selection of abrasive size and type shall be ‘based on the type, grade, and surface condition athe steel to be cleaned, type of blast cleaning system employed. the finished surface to be produced (cleanliness and rough ‘ness), and whether the abrasive will be recycled 6.2 Thecleanliness and size of recycled abrasives shall ‘be maintained to ensure compliance with this specification 6.3. The blast cleaning abrasive shall be dry and fre ofl, grease, and other contaminants as determined by the test methods found in SSPC-AB 1, AB 2 and AB 3. 6.4 Any limitations on the use of spectic abrasives, the quantity contaminants, or the degree of allowable embed- ‘mont shall beincludedin the procurement documents (project ‘specifcation) covering the work, because abrasive embed- ‘mont and abrasives containing contaminants may not bo acceptable for some service requirements. NOTE: Addi- tional information on abrasive selection is given in Section A2 of Appendix A. 7. Procedures Following Blast Cleaning and Immediately Prior to Coating TA. Visible deposits of oil, grease, or other contami- ‘nants shallbe removed according to SSPC-SP 1 oF another ‘method agreed upon by those parties responsible for esiab- lishing the requirements and those responsible for perform: Ing the work. 7.2. Dust and loase residues shall be removed from prepared surfaces by brushing, blowing off with clean, dry air, vacuum cleaning, or other methods agreed upon by those responsible for establishing the requirements and those responsible for performing the work, NOTE: The presence of toxic metals in the abrasives or paint being ‘removed may place resritions on the methods of cleaning permitted. Comply with all applicable regulations, Moisture ‘separators, ollseparators traps, or other equipment may be necessary to achieve clean, dty air righ by te 4 SSPE: Te Sac for tect Comings Hon Ja 2108-5408 2903 87 'SSPC-SP S/NACE No. 1 September 1, 2000, 7.3 Aller blast cleaning, surtace imperfections that remain e.g. sharp fins, sharp edges, weld spatter, burning slag, scabs, slivers, etc.) shall be removed to the extent required in the procurement decuments (project specitica- tion}. Any damage to the surface protlle resulting from the removal of surface imperfections shal be corrected to meet the requirements of Section? 4. NOTE: Additional informa- tion on surface imperfections is contained in Section A.5 of ‘Appendix A. 7-4 Anyvisible ustthat forms onthe surface ofthe steel after blast cleaning shall be removed by recieaning the usted areas to meet the requirements of this standard befate coating. NOTE: Information on rust back (re-rust- Ing) and surface condensation is containediin Sections A.6, AT and A.8 of Appendix A. 8. Inspection 4. Work and materials supplied under this standard fare subject to inspection by a representative of those sponsible for establishing the requirements. Materials and work areas shall be accessible to the inspector. The proce- dures and times of inspection sal bo as agreed upon by those responsible for establishing the requirements and those responsible for performing the work 8.2 Conditions not complying with this standard shallbe corrected. In the case of a dispute, an arbitration or setle- ‘ment procedure established in the procurement documents {project specification) shall bo followed. 1! no arbitration or Settlement procedure is established, then a procedure mu: tually agreeable to purchaser and supplier shall be used. 2 The procurement documents (project specification) should establish the responsibility for inspection and for any required affidavit certying compliance with the specitica- tion, 9. Safety and Environmental Requirements. 9.1 Because abrasive blast cleaning is a hazardous ‘operation, all work shall be conducted in compliance with applicable occupationalandenvironmentalhealthandsatety rules and regulations. NOTE: SSPC-PA Guide 3, "A Guide to Satoty in Paint Application,” addresses satety concerns for coating work. 10. Comments 10.1 Adgitional information and data relative to this slanderd are contained in Appendix A. Detaled information {nd data are presented in a separate document, SSPC:SP (COM, “Surface Preparation Commentary.” The recommen- dations contained in Appendix A and SSPC-SP COM are believed to represent good practice, but are not 10 be SSPC-SP SINACE No.1 September 1, 2000, considered requirements of the standard. The sections of 'SSPC-SP COM that discuss subjects related to industrial blast cleaning are listed below. Sublect ‘Commentary Section Abrasive Selection 6 Filrn Thickness. 10 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning... 8.2 Maintenance Repainting 42 Rust-back (Re-rusting) as Surface Profile 62 Visual Standards 1 Weld Spatter 444 Appendix A. Explanatory Notes ‘A.A FUNCTION: White metal blast cleaning (SSPC-SP SINACE No. t) provides the greatest degree of cleaning. It ‘should be used when the highest degree of blast cleanings required. The primary functions of blast cleaning bolore Coating are: (a) to remove material from the surface that can ‘cause early failure ofthe coating system and (b) to obtain a suitable suttace roughness and to enhance the adhesion of the new evating system. The hierarchy of blasting standards ‘as follows: white metal blast cleaning, near-white blast Cleaning, commercial blast cleaning, industal blast clean- ing, and brush-of blast cleaning. A2 ABRASIVE SELECTION: Types of metallic and ‘non-motalic abrasives are discussed in the Surface Propa ration Commentary (SSPC-SP COM). It is important to ‘recognize thatblasting abrasives may become embeddedin (oF leave residues on the surface of the steel during prepa- ration. While normally such embedment or residues are not detrimental, care should be taken to ensure that the abra- sive Is free from detrimental amounts of water-soluble, solvent-soluble, acid-soluble, or other soluble contaminants {particularly ifthe prepared stee! isto be used in an immer- sion environment). Criteria for selecting and evaluating abrasives are given in SSPC-AB 1, “Mineral and Slag Abrasives,” SSPC-AB 2, ‘Cleanliness af Recycled Ferrous Metalic Abrasives," ang SSPC-AB. 3, "Newly Manufactured or Re-Manulactured Stee! Abrasive A. SURFACE PROFILE: Surface profiles the rough ‘ness ofthe surface which results trom abrasive blast clean. Ing. The profil depth or height)is dependentupon the size, ‘shape, type, and hardness ofthe abrasive, particle velocity and angle of impact, hardness of the surface, amount of ‘recycling, and the proper maintenance of working mixtures of git andor shot. The allowable minimum/maximum height of profile is usually dependent upon the thickness of the coating to be applied. Large panicle sized abrasives (particularly metal righ by te 4 SSPE: Te Sac for tect Comings Mon Jal 2108-5408 2003 lic) can produce @ profile that may be too deep to be adequately covered by a single thin film coat. Accordingly. It is recommended that the use of larger abrasives be avoided in these cases. However, larger abrasives may be ‘needed for thick tlm coatings oo taciltate removal of thick coatings, heavy mill scale, of rust. If control of profile {minimum/maximum) is deemed to be significant to coating perfarmance, it should be addressed in the procurement documents (project specification). Typical profile heights achieved with commercial abrasive media are shown in Table 5 of the Surface Preparation Commentary (SSPC:SP COM). Surface profile should be measured in accordance with NACE Standard P0287 (latest edition), “Field Mea- ‘surement of Surface Profle of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Stee! Surfaces Using Replica Tape, * or ASTM" D 4417 (atest edition), "Test Method for Field Measurement of Surface A VISUAL STANDARDS: Note that the use of visual standards or comparators in conjunction with this standard |s required only wen specified in the procurement docu- ‘ment (project specification) covering the work. However, it is strongly recommended that the procurement dacument require the use of visual standards or comparators, SSPC- VIS 1-89 (Visual Standard for Abrasive Blast Cleaned Steel) provides colar photographs forthe various grades of surface preparation as a function ofthe initial condition of the steel The series A-SP 5, B-SP 5, C-SP 5 and D-SP 5 depict surfaces cleaned to white metal grade. In addition, the series A-SP 6 M and N depict surfaces cleaned by various ‘metallic and non-metallic abrasives to SP 5 condition, The NACE Visual Comparator for Surtace Finishing of Welds Prior to Coating is a plastic weld replica that complements, NAGE Standard RP 0178. Other available visual standards ‘are described in Section 11 of SSPC-SP COM. 5 SURFACE IMPERFECTIONS: Surface impertec- tions can cause premature fallure when the service is severe. Coatings tend to pull away trom sharp edges and projections, leaving lite or no coating to protect the under- lying steel. Other features that are dificult to property cover {and protect include crevices, weld porosities, laminations, fete. The high cost of the methods to remedy surface Imperfections requires weighing the benefits of edge round- Ing, weld spatter removal, etc., versus a potential coating failure Poorly adhering contaminants, such as weld slag dues, loose weld spatter, and some minor surface lamina- tions may be removed during the blast cleaning operation, (Other surtace detects (steel laminations, weld porosities, or deep corrosion pits) may not be evident until the surface proparation has been completed. Theretore, proper plan- © ASTM, 100 Baer Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19420- 2989, 58 hing for such surtace repair work is essential because the timing of the repairs may occur betore, during, or after the blast cleaning operation. Section 4.401 SSPC-SP COM and NACE Standard RPO178 (latest edition), “Fabrication De- tails, Surface Finish Requirements. and Proper Design Considerations for Tanks and Vessels to be Lined for lm- ‘mersion Service” contain additional Information on surface imperfections. AG CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION: Steel contami- ‘nated with soluble salts (e.g, chlorides and sulfates) devel- (ops rust-back rapidly at intermediate and high humidities, ‘These soluble salts canbe presenton the steel surface prior to blast cleaning as a result of atmospheric contamination, In adation, contaminants can be deposited on the steel surface during blast cleaning if the abrasive is contami hated. Therefore, rustback can be minimized by removing these salts rom the steel surface and eliminating sources of ‘econtamination during and after blast cleaning. Wet meth ‘ds of removal are described in SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5 Identification of the contaminants along with their concen: trations may be obtained from labocatory and field tests as described in SSPC-TU 4, “Technology Update on Field Methods for Retrieval and Analysis of Soluble Salts on Substrates.” A.7 RUST-BACK: Rust-back te-rusting) occurs when {teshly cleaned steelis exposed to moisture, contamination, fr acorrasive atmosphere. The time interval between blast Cleaning and rust-back will vary greatly from one environ: ‘ment to another. Under mild ambient conditions fehemical Contamination is not present [see Section A.) itis best to blast clean and coat a surface the same day. Severe Concitions may requite mare expedient coating application to avoid contamination from fallout. Chemical contamina: tion should be removed prior to coating (see Section A 6). A.B DEW POINT: Moisture condenses on any surface thatis colder than the dew point ofthe surrounding air. tis, therefore, recommended that the temperature ofthe steel surface be atleast3 °C (5°F) above the dew point during dry righ by te 4 SSPE: Te Sac for tects Comings Hon Ja 21 08-5414 2503 59 'SSPC-SP S/NACE No. 1 September 1, 2000, blast cleaning operations. itis advisable to visually inspect for moisture and periodically check the surface temperature {and dew point during blast cleaning operations and to avoid the application of coating over a damp surface. A9 WET ABRASIVE BLAST CLEANING: Sec! that 's wel abrasive blast cleaned may rust rapidly. Clean water should be used for rinsing. It may be necessary that Inhibitors be added to the water of applied to the surlace Immediately after blast cleaning to temporarily prevent rust formation. The use of inhibitors or the application of coating ‘ver slight discoloration should be in accordance with the requirements ofthe coating manufacturer. CAUTION: Some Inhibitive treatments may interfere with the performance of certain coating systems. AO. FILM THICKNESS: It is essential that ample coating be applied after blast cleaning to adequately cover the peaks ofthe surface profile. The dry lm thickness of the coating above the peaks of the profile should equal the thickness known to be needed for he desired protection. If the dry film thickness over the peaks is inadequate, prema- turerust-through or failure will oceur. To assure that coating thicknesses are properly measured the proceduresin SSPC- PA 2 (latest edition), “Measurement of Dry Coating Thick ‘ness with Magnetic Gauges" should be used A.11 MAINTENANCE ANDREPAIR PAINTING: When this standard is used in maintenance painting, specific Instructions should be given on the extent of surface to be bast cleaned or spot blast cleaned to this degree of clean- liness. In these cases, the cleaning shall be performed ‘across the entre area specified. For example, it all weld ‘seams are to be cleaned in a maintenance operation, this degree of cleaning shall be applied 100% to all weld seams, Iv the entire structure is to be prepared, this degree of leaning shall be applied to 100% of the entire structure SSPC-PA Guide 4 (latest edition), “Guide to Maintenance Repainting with Oil Base or Alkyd Painting Systems,” pro- vides a description of accepted practices for retaining old sound coating, removing unsound coating, feathering, and spot cleaning,

You might also like