Example of material variance
Carol’s Cookies expected to use 1.5 pounds of direct materials to produce
1 unit (batch) of product at a cost of $2 per pound. Actual results are in for
last year, which indicates 390,000 batches of cookies were sold. The
company purchased 640,000 pounds of materials at $1.80 per pound and
used 624,000 pounds in production.
The materials price variance is $(128,000) favorable, and the
materials quantity variance is $78,000 unfavorable.
Note: AQP = Actual quantity of materials purchased.
AP = Actual price of materials.
AQU = Actual quantity of materials used in production.
SP = Standard price of materials.
SQ = Standard quantity of materials for actual level of activity.
*Standard quantity of 585,000 pounds = Standard of 1.5 pounds per
unit × 390,000 actual units produced and sold.
**$1,170,000 standard direct materials cost matches the flexible
budget.
$(128,000) favorable materials price variance = $1,152,000 –
$1,280,000. Variance is favorable because the actual price of $1.80 is
lower than the expected/standard (budgeted) price of $2.
$78,000 unfavorable materials quantity variance = $1,248,000 –
$1,170,000. Variance is unfavorable because the actual quantity of
materials used in production of 624,000 pounds is higher than the
expected/standard (budgeted) quantity of 585,000 pounds.
Possible causes of favorable materials price variance are
The supplier had excess materials on hand and lowered prices
to sell off inventory;
New suppliers entered the market, which resulted in an excess
supply of materials and lower prices;
Carol’s Cookies’ purchasing agent is a strong negotiator and
was able to negotiate lower prices than anticipated;
Lower-quality materials were purchased at a lower price.
Possible causes of unfavorable materials quantity variance are
Lower-quality materials resulted in more waste and spoilage;
New, inexperienced employees were hired, resulting in more
waste;
Old equipment breaking down caused an increased amount of
waste.