Scribd
Upload
2K views1 page

ECPE Writing Rating Scale

This document provides a rating scale for evaluating writing responses. It rates responses on a scale of 1 to 5 in four categories: task completion, development, language, and authorial voice. For each category, it describes the characteristics of responses that would receive each possible score.

Uploaded by

Jenny's Journal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views1 page

ECPE Writing Rating Scale

This document provides a rating scale for evaluating writing responses. It rates responses on a scale of 1 to 5 in four categories: task completion, development, language, and authorial voice. For each category, it describes the characteristics of responses that would receive each possible score.

Uploaded by

Jenny's Journal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • ECPE Writing Rating Scale: Describes the criteria for evaluating ECPE writing tasks, focusing on task completion, development, language use, and rhetorical choices in responses.

Writing

Rating Scale
Response addresses the prompt-specific topic and fulfills all of the task requirements.
5
Task Completion

Integrates at least one provided source in the response.


4 *
Response is in the general topic area and fulfills all of the task requirements.
3 Includes at least one provided source in the response.
2 *
Response is in the general topic area but does not fulfill all of the task requirements.
1 Does not include a provided source in the response.

Ideas are extensively supported and developed. Response is a well thought out and convincing
5 consideration of the topic.
Clearly and logically organized.
Development

Ideas are well-supported and developed, and an in-depth consideration of the topic is provided.
4 Clearly and logically organized.
3 *
Support for ideas is given but may not be fully developed. Attempts to provide in-depth
2 consideration of the topic.
Not clearly or logically organized.
Ideas are not supported. Consideration of the topic is simplistic or generalized.
1 Not clearly or logically organized.

Demonstrates flexibility and a high degree of control of both simple and complex syntactic
7 structures.
Uses precise, sophisticated vocabulary appropriate to the context.
6 *
Demonstrates control of simple and some complex syntactic structures.
5 Uses simple and sometimes sophisticated vocabulary to adequately match the context.
Language

4 *
Demonstrates control of simple but not complex syntactic structures.
3 Uses simple vocabulary; attempts to use sophisticated vocabulary may not fit naturally into the
context and may cause confusion.
2 *
Demonstrates inconsistent control of simple syntactic structures.
1 Produces everyday vocabulary; most attempts at sophisticated vocabulary are not accurate or
precise, mostly confusing to the reader.
Authorial

3 Content is highly original; response engages the reader.


Voice

2 *
1 Content is not original; response is not engaging for the reader.

* Response shares features of adjacent levels.


No Score

No response is given.
Response is completely illegible.
Response is written on a different topic than those assigned.
Response is written in test taker’s L1.

Last Update: 04/2020 [Link]

You might also like