COVID-19 Overview and Guidelines
COVID-19 Overview and Guidelines
com/article/2500114-print
[Link]
Overview
Practice Essentials
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is defined as illness caused by a novel coronavirus called severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; formerly called 2019-nCoV), which was first identified amid an outbreak of respiratory
illness cases in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China.[1] It was initially reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) on
December 31, 2019. On January 30, 2020, the WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global health emergency.[2, 3] On
March 11, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, its first such designation since declaring H1N1 influenza a
pandemic in 2009.[4]
Illness caused by SARS-CoV-2 was termed COVID-19 by the WHO, the acronym derived from "coronavirus disease 2019." The
name was chosen to avoid stigmatizing the virus's origins in terms of populations, geography, or animal associations.[5, 6] On
February 11, 2020, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses issued a statement
announcing an official designation for the novel virus: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).[7]
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that SARS-CoV-2 entered the United States in late
January or early February 2020, establishing low-level community spread before being noticed.[8] Since that time, the United
States has experienced widespread infections, with over 29.8 million reported cases and over 542,000 deaths reported as of
March 25, 2021.
On April 3, 2020, the CDC issued a recommendation that the general public, even those without symptoms, should begin
wearing face coverings in public settings where social-distancing measures are difficult to maintain to abate the spread of
COVID-19.[9]
The CDC had postulated that this situation could result in large numbers of patients requiring medical care concurrently,
resulting in overloaded public health and healthcare systems and, potentially, elevated rates of hospitalizations and deaths. The
CDC advised that nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are the most important response strategy for delaying viral spread
and reducing disease impact. Unfortunately, these concerns have been proven accurate.
The feasibility and implications suppression and mitigation strategies have been rigorously analyzed and are being encouraged
or enforced by many governments to slow or halt viral transmission. Population-wide social distancing plus other interventions
(eg, home self-isolation, school and business closures) are strongly advised. These policies may be required for long periods to
avoid rebound viral transmission.[10] As the United States is experiencing another surge of COVID-19 infections, the CDC has
intensified their recommendations for transmission mitigation. They have recommended universal face mask use, physical
distancing, avoiding nonessential indoor spaces, postponing travel, enhanced ventilation, and hand hygiene.[11]
According to the CDC, individuals at high risk for infection include persons in areas with ongoing local transmission, healthcare
workers caring for patients with COVID-19, close contacts of infected persons, and travelers returning from locations where local
spread has been reported.
The CDC has provided recommendations for individuals who are at high risk for COVID-19–related complications, including
older adults and persons who have serious underlying health conditions including[12] :
Cancer
Chronic kidney disease
COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
Heart conditions (eg, heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathies)
[Link] 1/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Immunocompromised state from solid organ transplant
Obesity (BMI 30 to less than 40 kg/m2)
Severe Obesity (BMI 40 kg/m2 or greater)
Pregnancy
Sickle cell disease
Smoking
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Stock up on supplies.
Avoid close contact with sick people.
Wash hands often.
Stay home as much as possible in locations where COVID-19 is spreading.
Develop a plan in case of illness.
Presentations of COVID-19 range from asymptomatic/mild symptoms to severe illness and mortality. Symptoms may develop 2
days to 2 weeks after exposure to the virus.[13] A pooled analysis of 181 confirmed cases of COVID-19 outside Wuhan, China,
found the mean incubation period to be 5.1 days and that 97.5% of individuals who developed symptoms did so within 11.5 days
of infection.[14]
Wu and McGoogan reported that, among 72,314 COVID-19 cases reported to the Chinese Center for disease Control and
Prevention (CCDC), 81% were mild (absent or mild pneumonia), 14% were severe (hypoxia, dyspnea, >50% lung involvement
within 24-48 hours), 5% were critical (shock, respiratory failure, multiorgan dysfunction), and 2.3% were fatal. Multiple reports
from around the globe have subsequently confirmed these patterns of presentation.[15]
Fever or chills
Cough
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
Fatigue
Muscle or body aches
Headache
New loss of taste or smell
Sore throat
Congestion or runny nose
Nausea or vomiting
Diarrhea
Sputum production
Malaise
Respiratory distress
Neurologic (eg, headache, altered mentality)
A complete or partial loss of the sense of smell (anosmia) has been reported as a potential history finding in patients eventually
diagnosed with COVID-19.[17] A phone survey of outpatients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 found that 64.4% (130 of 202)
reported any altered sense of smell or taste.[18]
Diagnosis
COVID-19 should be considered a possibility in (1) patients with respiratory tract symptoms and newly onset fever or (2) in
patients with severe lower respiratory tract symptoms with no clear cause. Suspicion is increased if such patients have been in
an area with community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or have been in close contact with an individual with confirmed or
suspected COVID-19 in the preceding 14 days.
Patients who do not require emergency care are encouraged to contact their healthcare provider over the phone. Patients with
suspected COVID-19 who present to a healthcare facility should prompt infection-control measures. They should be evaluated
in a private room with the door closed (an airborne infection isolation room is ideal) and asked to wear a surgical mask. All other
[Link] 2/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
standard contact and airborne precautions should be observed, and treating healthcare personnel should wear eye protection.
[19]
Management
Utilization of programs established by the FDA to allow clinicians to gain access to investigational therapies during the pandemic
has been essential. The expanded access (EA) and emergency use authorization (EUA) programs allowed for rapid deployment
of potential therapies for investigation and investigational therapies with emerging evidence. A review by Rizk et al describes the
role for each of these measures and their importance to providing medical countermeasures in the event of infectious disease
and other threats.[20]
On October 22, 2020, remdesivir, an antiviral agent, was the first drug approved for treatment of COVID-19. It is indicated for
treatment of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized adults and children aged 12 years and older who weigh at least 40 kg.[21] An
emergency use authorization (EUA) remains in place to treat children younger than 12 years who weigh at least 3.5 kg.[22]
An EUA for convalescent plasma was announced on August 23, 2020 and reissued November 30, 2020.[23] Subsequently, the
FDA issued guidance to limit use to high titer plasma only.
Another EUA for the antibody mixture, casirivimab and imdevimab was issued by the FDA on November 21, 2020.[24]
Baricitinib was issued an EUA on November 19, 2020 for use, in combination with remdesivir, for treatment of suspected or
laboratory confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitalized patients aged 2 years and older who require
supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).[25]
The FDA has granted EUAs for 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines since December, 2020. Two are mRNA vaccines – BNT-162b2 (Pfizer)
and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), whereas the third is a viral vector vaccine – Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson).
Infected patients should receive supportive care to help alleviate symptoms. Vital organ function should be supported in severe
cases.[26]
Numerous collaborative efforts to discover and evaluate effectiveness of antivirals, immunotherapies, monoclonal antibodies,
and vaccines have rapidly emerged. Guidelines and reviews of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 have been published.[27, 28,
29, 30, 31]
Background
Coronaviruses comprise a vast family of viruses, 7 of which are known to cause disease in humans. Some coronaviruses that
typically infect animals have been known to evolve to infect humans. SARS-CoV-2 is likely one such virus, postulated to have
originated in a large animal and seafood market.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) are also caused by coronaviruses
that “jumped” from animals to humans. More than 8,000 individuals developed SARS, nearly 800 of whom died of the illness
(mortality rate of approximately 10%), before it was controlled in 2003.[32] MERS continues to resurface in sporadic cases. A
total of 2,465 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS have been reported since 2012, resulting in 850 deaths (mortality rate of
34.5%).[33]
Route of Transmission
The principal mode by which people are infected with SARS-CoV-2 is through exposure to respiratory droplets carrying
infectious virus (generally within a space of 6 feet). Additional methods include contact transmission (eg, shaking hands) and
airborne transmission of droplets that linger in the air over long distances (usually greater than 6 feet).[34, 35, 36] Virus released
in respiratory secretions (eg, during coughing, sneezing, talking) can infect other individuals via contact with mucous
membranes.
On July 9, 2020, the World Health Organization issued an update stating that airborne transmission may play a role in the
spread of COVID-19, particularly involving “super spreader” events in confined spaces such as bars, although they stressed a
lack of such evidence in medical settings. Thus, they emphasized the importance of social distancing and masks in prevention.
[36]
The virus can also persist on surfaces to varying durations and degrees of infectivity, although this is not believed to be the main
route of transmission.[34] One study found that SARS-CoV-2 remained detectable for up to 72 hours on some surfaces despite
[Link] 3/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
decreasing infectivity over time. Notably, the study reported that no viable SARS-CoV-2 was measured after 4 hours on copper
or after 24 hours on cardboard.[37]
In a separate study, Chin and colleagues found that the virus was very susceptible to high heat (70°C). At room temperature and
moderate (65%) humidity, no infectious virus could be recovered from printing and tissue papers after a 3-hour incubation period
or from wood and cloth by day two. On treated smooth surfaces, infectious virus became undetectable from glass by day 4 and
from stainless steel and plastic by day 7. “Strikingly, a detectable level of infectious virus could still be present on the outer layer
of a surgical mask on day 7 (~0.1% of the original inoculum).”[38] Contact with fomites is thought to be less significant than
person-to-person spread as a means of transmission.[34]
Utilizing a decision analytical model, Johansson et al from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assess
transmission from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals across various scenarios to determine the
infectious period of transmitting SARS-CoV-2. They estimate at least 50% of new SARS CoV-2 infections originated from
exposure to individuals with infection, but without symptoms.[39]
Viral shedding
The duration of viral shedding varies significantly and may depend on severity. Among 137 survivors of COVID-19, viral
shedding based on testing of oropharyngeal samples ranged from 8-37 days, with a median of 20 days.[40] A different study
found that repeated viral RNA tests using nasopharyngeal swabs were negative in 90% of cases among 21 patients with mild
illness, whereas results were positive for longer durations in patients with severe COVID-19.[41] In an evaluation of patients
recovering from severe COVID-19, Zhou and colleagues found a median shedding duration of 31 days (range, 18-48 days).[42]
These studies have all used PCR detection as a proxy for viral shedding. The Korean CDC, investigating a cohort of patients
who had prolonged PCR positivity, determined that infectious virus was not present.[43] These findings were incorporated into
the CDC guidance on the duration of isolation following COVID-19 infection.
Additionally, patients with profound immunosuppression (eg, following hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, receiving cellular
therapies) may shed viable SARS-CoV-2 for at least 2 months.[44, 45]
SARS-CoV-2 has also been found in the semen of men with acute infection, as well as in some male patients who have
recovered.[46]
Oran and Topol published a narrative review of multiple studies on asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Such studies and news
articles reported rates of asymptomatic infection in several worldwide cohorts, including resident populations from Iceland and
Italy, passengers and crew aboard the cruise ship Diamond Princess, homeless persons in Boston and Los Angeles, obstetric
patients in New York City, and crew aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt and Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier, among several
others. They found that approximately 40-45% of SARS-CoV-2 infections were asymptomatic.[47]
Utilizing a decision analytical model, Johansson et al from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assess
transmission from presymptomatic, never symptomatic, and symptomatic individuals across various scenarios to determine the
infectious period of transmitting SARS-CoV-2. Results from their base case determined 59% of all transmission came from
asymptomatic transmission, comprising 35% from presymptomatic individuals and 24% from individuals who never develop
symptoms. They estimate at least 50% of new SARSCoV-2 infections originated from exposure to individuals with infection, but
without symptoms.[39]
Zou and colleagues followed viral expression through infection via nasal and throat swabs in a small cohort of patients. They
found increases in viral loads at the time that the patients became symptomatic. One patient never developed symptoms but
was shedding virus beginning at day 7 after presumed infection.[48]
Epidemiology
Coronavirus outbreak and pandemic
As of March 25, 2021, confirmed COVID-19 infections number over 124 million individuals worldwide and has resulted in over
2.7 million deaths. Globally, nearly all countries have reported laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19.[49]
In the United States, over 29.8 million reported cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed as of March 25, 2021, resulting in over
542,000 deaths, making it the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer.[50, 51, 52] Beginning in late March
2020, the United States had more confirmed infections than any other country in the world.[53] The United States also has the
most confirmed deaths in the world, followed by Brazil and India.[49]
Communities of color have been disproportionally devastated by COVID-19 in the United States and in Europe. Date from New
Orleans illustrated these disparities. African Americans represent 31% of the population but 76.9% of the hospitalizations and
70.8% of the deaths.[54]
The reasons are still being elucidated, but data suggest the cumulative effects of health disparities are the driving force. The
prevalence of chronic (high- risk) medical conditions is higher and access to health care may be less available. Finally,
socioeconomic status may decrease the ability to isolate and avoid infection.[55, 56]
Communities of color have been disproportionally devastated by COVID-19 in the United States and in Europe. Date from New
Orleans illustrated these disparities. African Americans represent 31% of the population but 76.9% of the hospitalizations and
70.8% of the deaths.
CDC has maintained a COVID-19 Data Tracker for near real time updates.
Young Adults
Outcomes from COVID-19 disease in young adults have been described by Cunningham and colleagues. Of 3200 adults aged
18-34 years hospitalized in the US with COVID-19, 21% were admitted to the ICU, 10% required mechanical ventilation, and 3%
died. Comorbidities included obesity 33% (25% overall were morbidly obese), diabetes 18%, and hypertension 16%.
Independent predictors of death or mechanical ventilation included hypertension, male gender, and morbid obesity. Young adults
with multiple risk factors for poor outcomes from COVID-19 compared similarly to middle-aged adults without such risk factors.
[57]
A study from South Korea found that older children and adolescents are more likely to transmit SARS CoV-19 to family
members than are younger children. The researchers reported that the highest infection rate (18.6%) was in household contacts
of patients with COVID-19 aged 10-19 years and the lowest rate (5.3%) was in household contacts of those aged 0-9 years.[58]
Teenagers have been shown to be the source of clusters of cases illustrating the role of older children.[59]
COVID-19 in children
Data continue to emerge regarding the incidence and how children are affected by COVID-19, especially for severe disease. A
severe multisystem inflammatory syndrome linked to COVID-19 infection has been described in children.[60, 61, 62, 63]
The American Academy of Pediatrics reports children represent 13.3% of all cases in the 49 states reporting by age, over 3.3
million children have tested positive in the US since the onset of the pandemic as of March 18, 2021. This represents and
overall rate of 4,440 cases per 100,000 children. During the 2-week period of March 4-18, 2021 there was a 3% increase in
cumulated number of children who tested positive, representing 109,772 new cases. Children were 1.3-3% of total reported
hospitalizations, and between 0.1-2.1% of all child COVID-19 cases resulted in hospitalization.[64]
In September 2020, the CDC published the demographics of SARS-CoV-2-associated deaths among persons aged 21 years
and younger. At the time of publication, approximately 6.5 million cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 190,000 associated
deaths were reported in the United States. Persons younger than 21 years constitute 26% of the US population. Characteristics
of the 121 COVID-related deaths among this population reported between February 12 to July 31, 2020 include[65] :
Male: 63%
Younger than 1 year: 10%
Aged 1-9 years: 20%
Aged 10-20 years: 70%
Hispanic: 45%
Black: 29%
Native American or Alaska persons: 4%
Underlying conditions: 75%
Died after hospital admission: 65%
Died at home or emergency department: 32%
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized children and adolescents aged 1 month to 21 years with COVID-19 in the
New York City area have been described. These observations alerted clinicians to rare, but severe illness in children. Of 67
children who tested positive for COVID-19, 21 (31.3%) were managed as outpatients. Among 46 hospitalized patients, 33 (72%)
were admitted to the general pediatric medical unit and 13 (28%) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Obesity and asthma
were highly prevalent, but not significantly associated with PICU admission (P = .99).
Admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) was significantly associated with higher C-reactive protein, procalcitonin,
and pro-B type natriuretic peptide levels and platelet counts (P < .05 for all). Patients in the PICU were more likely to require
high-flow nasal cannula (P = .0001) and were more likely to have received remdesivir through compassionate release (P < .05).
Severe sepsis and septic shock syndromes were observed in 7 (53.8%) patients in the PICU. ARDS was observed in 10 (77%)
[Link] 5/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
PICU patients, 6 of whom (46.2%) required invasive mechanical ventilation for a median of 9 days. Of the 13 patients in the
PICU, 8 (61.5%) were discharged home, and 4 (30.7%) patients remain hospitalized on ventilatory support at day 14. One
patient died after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy associated with metastatic cancer.[66]
A case series of 91 children who tested positive for COVID-19 in South Korea showed 22% were asymptomatic during the entire
observation period. Among 71 symptomatic cases, 47 children (66%) had unrecognized symptoms before diagnosis, 18 (25%)
developed symptoms after diagnosis, and 6 (9%) were diagnosed at the time of symptom onset. Twenty-two children (24%) had
lower respiratory tract infections. The mean (SD) duration of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in upper respiratory samples
was 17.6 (6.7) days. These results lend more data to unapparent infections in children that may be associated with silent
COVID-19 community transmission.[67]
An Expert Consensus Statement has been published that discusses diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19 in
children.
Media reports and a health alert from the New York State Department of Health drew initial attention to a newly recognized
multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19. Since then, MIS-C cases have been
reported across the United States and Europe, and the American Academy of Pediatrics has published interim guidance.
Symptoms are reminiscent of Kawasaki disease, atypical Kawasaki disease, or toxic shock syndrome. All patients had
persistent fevers, and more than half had rashes and abdominal complaints. Interestingly, respiratory symptoms were rarely
described. Many patients did not have PCR results positive for COVID-19, but many had strong epidemiologic links with close
contacts who tested positive. Furthermore, many had antibody tests positive for SARS-CoV-2. These findings suggest recent
past infection, and this syndrome may be a postinfectious inflammatory syndrome. The CDC case definition requires:
An individual younger than 21 years presenting with fever ≥38.0°C for ≥24 hours, laboratory evidence of inflammation (including
an elevated C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], fibrinogen, procalcitonin, D-dimer, ferritin, lactic acid
dehydrogenase [LDH], or interleukin 6 [IL-6], elevated neutrophils, reduced lymphocytes, and low albumin), and evidence of
clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with multisystem (≥2) organ involvement (cardiac, renal, respiratory,
hematologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, or neurological); AND
Jiang and colleagues reviewed the literature on MIS-C noting the multiple organ system involvement. Unlike classic Kawasaki
Disease, the children tended to be older and those of Asian ethnicity tended to be spared.[68]
A case series compared 539 patients who had MIS-C with 577 children and adolescents who had severe COVID-19. The
patients with MIS-C were typically younger (predominantly aged 6-12 years) and more likely to be non-Hispanic Black. They
were less likely to have an underlying chronic medical condition, such as obesity. Severe cardiovascular or mucocutaneous
involvement was more common in those with MIS-C. Patients with MIS-C also had higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios, higher
CRP levels, and lower platelet counts than those with severe COVID-19.[69]
The US COVID-19 PRIORITY study (Pregnancy coRonavIrus Outcomes RegIsTrY) pregnancy registry is open. Additionally, the
study has a dashboard for real time data.
The CDC COVID-NET data published in September 2020 reported that among 598 hospitalized pregnant women with COVID-
19, 55% were asymptomatic at admission. Severe illness occurred among symptomatic pregnant women, including intensive
care unit admissions (16%), mechanical ventilation (8%), and death (1%). Pregnancy losses occurred for 2% of pregnancies
completed during COVID-19-associated hospitalizations, and were experienced by both symptomatic and asymptomatic
women.[70]
A multicenter study involving 16 Spanish hospitals reported outcomes of 242 pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 during
their third trimester from March 13 to May 31, 2020. The women and their 248 newborns were monitored until the infant was 1
month old. COVID-19 positive who were hospitalized had a higher risk of ending their pregnancy via C-section (P = 0.027).
Newborns whose mothers had been admitted owing to their COVID-19 infection had a higher risk of premature delivery (P =
0.006). No infants died and no vertical or horizontal transmission was detected. Infants exclusively breastfed at discharge was
41.7% and was 40.4% at 1 month.[71]
A cohort study of pregnant women (n = 64) with severe or critical COVID-19 disease hospitalized at 12 US institutions between
March 5, 2020, and April 20, 2020 has been published. At the time of the study, most women (81%) received
hydroxychloroquine; 7% of women with severe disease and 65% with critical disease received remdesivir. All women with critical
disease received either prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation. One 1 case of maternal cardiac arrest occurred, but there
[Link] 6/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
were no cases of cardiomyopathy or maternal death. Half of the women (n=32) delivered during their hospitalization (34%
severe group; 85% critical group). Additionally, 88% with critical disease delivered preterm during their disease course, with 16
of 17 (94%) pregnant women giving birth through cesarean delivery. Overall, 15 of 20 (75%) women with critical disease
delivered preterm. There were no stillbirths or neonatal deaths or cases of vertical transmission.[72]
Adhikari and colleagues published a cohort study evaluating 252 pregnant women with COVID-19 in Texas. Maternal illness at
initial presentation was asymptomatic or mild in 95%of women, and 3% developed severe or critical illness. Compared with
COVID negative pregnancies, there was no difference in the composite primary outcome of preterm birth, preeclampsia with
severe features, or cesarean delivery for abnormal fetal heart rate. Early neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred in 6 of 188
tested infants (3%), primarily born to asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women. There were no placental pathologic
differences by illness severity.[73]
Breastfeeding
A study by Chambers and colleagues found human milk is unlikely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 from infected mothers to
infants. The study included 64 milk samples provided by 18 mothers infected with COVID-19. Samples were collected before
and after COVID-19 diagnosis. No replication-competent virus was detectable in any of their milk samples compared with
samples of human milk that were experimentally infected with SARS-CoV-2.[74]
Mothers who have been infected with SARS CoV-2 may have neutralizing antibodies expressed in breast milk. In an evaluation
of 37 milk samples from 18 women, 76% contained SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, and 80% had SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG. 62% of
the milk samples were able to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro. These results support recommendations to continue
breastfeeding with masking during mild-to-moderate maternal COVID-19 illness.[75]
Data for people with HIV and coronavirus are emerging. A multicenter registry has published outcomes for 286 patients with HIV
who tested positive for COVID-19 between April 1 and July 1, 2020. Patient characteristics included mean age of 51.4 years,
25.9% were female, and 75.4% were African-American or Hispanic. Most patients (94.3%) were on antiretroviral therapy, 88.7%
had HIV virologic suppression, and 80.8% had comorbidities. Within 30 days of positive SARS-CoV-2 testing, 164 (57.3%)
patients were hospitalized, and 47 (16.5%) required ICU admission. Mortality rates were 9.4% (27/286) overall, 16.5% (27/164)
among those hospitalized, and 51.5% (24/47) among those admitted to an ICU.[76]
Multiple case series have subsequently been published. Most suggest similar outcomes in patients living with HIV as the
general patient population.[77, 78] Severe COVID-19 has been seen, however, suggesting that neither antiretroviral therapy of
HIV infection are protective.[76, 79]
COVID-19 in clinicians
Among a sample of health care providers who routinely cared for COVID-19 patients in 13 US academic medical centers from
February 1, 2020, 6% had evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with considerable variation by location that generally
correlated with community cumulative incidence. Among participants who had positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies,
approximately one-third did not recall any symptoms consistent with an acute viral illness in the preceding months, nearly one
half did not suspect that they previously had COVID-19, and approximately two-thirds did not have a previous positive test result
demonstrating an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.[80]
Prognosis
Early data
COVID-19–related deaths in China have mostly involved older individuals (≥60 years) and persons with serious underlying
health conditions. In the United States, attributable deaths have been most common in adults aged 85 years or older (10-27%),
followed by adults aged 65-84 years (3-11%), adults aged 55-64 years (1-3%), and adults aged 20-54 years (< 1%). As of March
16, 2020 no fatalities or ICU admissions had been reported in persons aged 19 years or younger.[81]
One of the strongest predictors of mortality is age. The death rate for patients aged over 85 years was 304.9 per 1000 cases
verses 0.4 per 1000 cases for children under 18 years old.[82]
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are both independently associated with a significant increased odds of in-hospital death with
COVID-19. A nationwide analysis in England of 61,414,470 individuals in the registry alive as of February 19, 2020, 0.4% had a
[Link] 7/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
recorded diagnosis of type 1 diabetes and 4.7% of type 2 diabetes. A total of 23,804 COVID-19 deaths in England were
reported as of May 11, 2020, one-third were in people with diabetes, including 31.4% with type 2 diabetes and 1.5% with type 1
diabetes. Upon multivariate adjustment, the odds of in-hospital COVID-19 death were 3.5 for those with type 1 diabetes and
2.03 for those with type 2 diabetes, compared with deaths without known diabetes. Further adjustment for cardiovascular
comorbidities found the odds ratios were still significantly elevated in both type 1 (2.86) and type 2 (1.81) diabetes.[83]
Virology
The full genome of SARS-CoV-2 was first posted by Chinese health authorities soon after the initial detection, facilitating viral
characterization and diagnosis. The CDC analyzed the genome from the first US patient who developed the infection on January
24, 2020, concluding that the sequence is nearly identical to the sequences reported by China.[1] SARS-CoV-2 is a group 2b
beta-coronavirus that has at least 70% similarity in genetic sequence to SARS-CoV.[33] Like MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV,
SARS-CoV-2 originated in bats.[1]
A new virus variant emerges when the virus develops 1 or more mutations that differentiate it from the predominant virus
variants circulating in a population. The CDC surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants includes US COVID-19 cases caused by
variants. The site also includes which mutations are associated with particular variants. The CDC has launched a genomic
surveillance dashboard. Researchers are studying how variants may or may not alter the extent of protection by available
vaccines.
Mutations
Viral mutations may naturally occur anywhere in the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Unlike the human DNA genome, which is slow to
mutate, RNA viruses can readily, and quickly, mutate. A mutation may alter the viral function (eg, enhance receptor binding), or
may have no discernable function.
Mutations have been identified for the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Several of these
mutations display higher binding affinity to human ACE2, likely owing to enhanced structural stabilization of the RBD. Whether a
mutation enhances viral transmission is a question to explore. Possible mechanisms of increased transmissibility include
increased viral shedding, longer contagious interval, increased infectivity, or increased environmental stability.
D614G mutation
In early May 2020, a study by Korber and colleagues reported the emergence of a SARS-CoV-2 mutation (Spike D614G), one of
several spike (S) mutations that have been discovered.[84] SARS-CoV-2 infections with this mutation have become the
dominant viral lineage in North America, Europe, and Australia. The significance of the D614G mutation in terms of factors such
as transmissibility, virulence, antigenicity, and potential treatment resistance is poorly understood.[85]
Further research on the D614G spike protein mutation has now suggested a gain in fitness and transmission effectiveness.[86]
An analysis of British data, the 614G mutation appeared to confer a selective advantage. There was no indication that patients
infected with the Spike 614G variant have higher COVID-19 mortality or clinical severity, but 614G is associated with higher viral
load and younger age of patients which could drive different transmission dynamics.[87]
Mutations in the SARS CoV-2 spike protein RBD are being monitored as they have the potential to decrease the efficacy of
neutralizing antibodies. Recent work has focused on the exposure to monoclonal antibody therapy driving selection of resistant
mutants.[88] Viral variants that resist neutralization have been found circulating in the environment,[89] and have been selected
by use of convalescent sera in a clinical setting.[90]
Variants
As mentioned, viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 change. Among the hundreds of variants detected in the first year of the pandemic,
the ones that are most concerning are the so-called variants of concern (VOCs).
A novel spike mutation with deletions of (delta)69/delta(70) has been shown to occur de novo on multiple occasions and be
maintained through sustained transmission in association with other mutations.[91] This is the source of intense scrutiny in
Europe, especially in the United Kingdom. A recent VOC – 202012/01 (201/501Y.V1) contains the deletion 69-70 as well as
several other mutations including: N501Y, A570D, D614G, P681H, T716I, S982A, D1118H. The variant is being investigated as
a cause of rapid increase in case numbers possibly due to increased viral loads and transmissibility. The N501Y mutation seems
to increase viral loads 0.5 log.[92]
[Link] 8/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Additionally, VOC-202012/01 has mutations that appear to account for its enhanced transmission. The N501Y replacement on
the spike protein has been shown to increase ACE2 binding and cell infectivity in animal models. The deletion at positions 69
and 70 of the spike protein (delta69-70) has been associated with diagnostic test failure for the ThermoFisher TaqPath probe
targeting the spike protein. Therefore, British labs are using this test failure to identify the variant.[93]
Surveillance data from the UK national community testing (“Pillar 2”) showed a rapid increase in S-gene target failures (SGTF)
in PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in November and December 2020. The R0 of this variant seems higher. At the same time that
the transmission of the wild type virus was dropping, the variant increased, suggesting that the same recommendations (eg,
masks, social distancing) may not be enough. The UK variant is also infecting more children (aged 19 years and younger) than
the wild type indicating that it may be more transmissible in children. This has raised concerns because a relative sparing of
children has been observed to date. This variant is hypothesized to have a stronger ACE binding than the original variant, which
was felt to have trouble infecting younger individuals as they express ACE to a lesser degree.[93]
The CDC predicts the B.1.1.7 variant will be the major circulating variant in the US by March 2021. As of January 27, 2021, this
variant has been detected in 28 states.[94]
Other variants
Enhanced genomic surveillance in some countries have detected other VOCs including B.1.351 (501Y.V2) first detected in
South Africa and the B.1.1.28 (renamed P.1) (501Y.V3) which was detected in 4 travelers from Brazil during routine screening at
the Tokyo airport.[94]
The E484K mutation was found initially in the South Africa and Brazil variants in late 2020, and was observed in the UK variant
in early February 2021.
Position 484 and 501 mutations that are both present in the South African variant, and the combination is a concern that
immune escape may occur. These mutations, among others, have combined to create the VOC B.1.351. The mutation at the
501 position changes the shape of the RBD by rotating it by 20 degrees to allow deeper binding. The mutation at the 484
position changes the RBD to a positive charge, and allows a higher affinity to the ACE2 receptor.[95]
Brazilian VOCs
Sabino et al describe resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil in January 2021, despite a high seroprevalence. A study of
blood donors indicated that 76% of the population had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 by October 2020. Hospitalizations for
COVID-19 in Manaus numbered 3,431 in January 1-19, 2021 compared with 552 for December 1-19, 2020. Hospitalizations had
remained stable and low for 7 months prior to December. Several postulated variables regarding this resurgence include waning
titers to the original viral lineage and the high prevalence of the P.1 variant, which was first discovered in Manaus.[96] In
addition, researchers are monitoring emergence of a second variant in Brazil, P.2, identified in Rio de Janeiro.
Researchers are studying how variants may or may not alter the extent of protection by available vaccines.
Presentation
History
Presentations of COVID-19 have ranged from asymptomatic/mild symptoms to severe illness and mortality. Common symptoms
have included fever, cough, and shortness of breath.[13] Other symptoms, such as malaise and respiratory distress, have also
been described.[33]
Symptoms may develop 2 days to 2 weeks after exposure to the virus.[13] A pooled analysis of 181 confirmed cases of COVID-
19 outside Wuhan, China, found the mean incubation period to be 5.1 days and that 97.5% of individuals who developed
symptoms did so within 11.5 days of infection.[14]
Fever or chills
Cough
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
Fatigue
[Link] 9/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Sputum production
Malaise
Respiratory distress
Neurologic (eg, headache, altered mentality)
Wu and McGoogan reported that, among 72,314 COVID-19 cases reported to the Chinese Center for disease Control and
Prevention (CCDC), 81% were mild (absent or mild pneumonia), 14% were severe (hypoxia, dyspnea, >50% lung involvement
within 24-48 hours), 5% were critical (shock, respiratory failure, multiorgan dysfunction), and 2.3% were fatal.[15] These general
symptom distribution have been reconfirmed across multiple observations.[82, 97]
Clinicians evaluating patients with fever and acute respiratory illness should obtain information regarding travel history or
exposure to an individual who recently returned from a country or US state experiencing active local transmission.[98]
Williamson and colleagues, in an analysis of 17 million patients, reaffirmed that severe COVID-19 and mortality was more
common in males, older individuals, individuals in poverty, Black persons, and patients with medical conditions such as diabetes
and severe asthma, among others.[99]
A multicenter observational cohort study conducted in Europe found frailty to be a greater predictor of mortality than age or
comorbidities.[100]
Type A blood has been suggested as a potential factor that predisposes to severe COVID-19, specifically in terms of increasing
the risk of respiratory failure. Blood type O appears to confer a protective effect.[101, 102]
Patients with suspected COVID-19 should be reported immediately to infection-control personnel at their healthcare facility and
the local or state health department. Current CDC guidance calls for the patient to be cared for with airborne and contact
precautions (including eye shield) in place.[19] Patient candidates for such reporting include those with fever and symptoms of
lower respiratory illness who have travelled from Wuhan City, China, within the preceding 14 days or who have been in contact
with an individual under investigation for COVID-19 or a patient with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in the preceding 14 days.
[98]
A complete or partial loss of the sense of smell (anosmia) has been reported as a potential history finding in patients eventually
diagnosed with COVID-19.[17] A phone survey of outpatients with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 found that 64.4% (130 of 202)
reported any altered sense of smell or taste.[18] In a European study of 72 patients with PCR results positive for COVID-19, 53
patients (74%) reported reduced olfaction, while 50 patients (69%) reported a reduced sense of taste. Forty-nine patients (68%)
reported both symptoms.[103]
Physical Examination
Patients who are under investigation for COVID-19 should be evaluated in a private room with the door closed (an airborne
infection isolation room is ideal) and asked to wear a surgical mask. All other standard contact and airborne precautions should
be observed, and treating healthcare personnel should wear eye protection.[19]
The most common serious manifestation of COVID-19 upon initial presentation is pneumonia. Fever, cough, dyspnea, and
abnormalities on chest imaging are common in these cases.[104, 105, 106, 107]
Huang and colleagues found that, among patients with pneumonia, 99% had fever, 70% reported fatigue, 59% had dry cough,
40% had anorexia, 35% experienced myalgias, 31% had dyspnea, and 27% had sputum production.[104]
Complications
[Link] 10/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Complications of COVID-19 have included pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, arrhythmia, septic
shock, liver dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and multi-organ failure, among others.
Approximately 5% of patients with COVID-19, and 20% of those hospitalized, experience severe symptoms necessitating
intensive care. The common complications among hospitalized patients include pneumonia (75%), ARDS (15%), AKI (9%), and
acute liver injury (19%). Cardiac injury has been increasingly noted including troponin elevation, acute heart failure,
dysrhythmias, and myocarditis. 10-25% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients experience prothrombotic coagulopathy resulting in
venous and arterial thromboembolic events. Neurologic manifestations include impaired consciousness and stroke.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has matured, more patients have reported long-term, post infection sequelae. The majority of
patients recover fully but those that do not have reported adverse symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, cough, anxiety,
depression, inability to focus (ie, “brain fog”), gastrointestinal problems, sleep difficulties, joint pain, and chest pain lasting weeks
to months after the acute illness. Long-term studies are underway to understand the nature of these complaints.[108]
Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) infection is the medical term for what is commonly called ‘long COVID’ (or Long
Haulers). The US National Institutes of Health includes discussion of persistent symptoms or organ dysfunction after acute
COVID-19 within guidelines that discuss the clinical spectrum of the disease.[109]
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued guidelines on care of long-COVID that define the
syndrome as: signs and symptoms that develop during or after an infection consistent with COVID-19, continue for more than 12
weeks, and are not explained by an alternative diagnosis.[110]
An international web-based survey of respondents (n = 3,762) with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 from 56 countries tallied
prevalence of 205 symptoms in 10 organ systems, with 66 symptoms traced over 7 months. The most frequent symptoms
reported after 6 months were fatigue (77.7%), postexertional malaise (72.2%), and cognitive dysfunction (55.4%). Nearly 50%
were unable to return to work 6 months after infection.[111]
A long-term follow-up study of adults with non-critical COVID-19 at 30 and 60 days post infection revealed ongoing symptoms in
two-thirds of patients. The most common symptoms included anosmia/ageusia in 28% (40/150) at day 30 and 23% (29/130) at
day 60; dyspnea in 36.7% (55/150) patients at day 30 and 30% (39/130) at day 60; and fatigue/weakness in 49.3% (74/150) at
day 30 and 40% (52/130) at day 60. Persistent symptoms at day 60 were significantly associated with age 40 to 60 years old,
hospital admission, and abnormal auscultation at symptom onset.[112]
A follow-up study of COVID-19 consequences in 1,733 patients discharged from the hospital in Wuhan, China after 6 months
reported fatigue or muscle weakness (63%), sleep difficulties (26%), and anxiety or depression (23%) were the most common
symptoms. Lung function, as measured by CT showing interstitial change and 6-minute walking distance, was less than the
lower limit of normal for 22-56% across different severity scales.[113]
A study of 55 patients from China looked at long-term pulmonary follow-up 3 months after discharge from a symptomatic
COVID-19 illness. Patients’ mean age was 47 years, 42% were female, and 85% had moderate disease. Only 9 patients
(16.4%) had underlying comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases, but none had
preexisting pulmonary disease. None of the patients required mechanical ventilation. At 3 months, 71% still had abnormal chest
CT scans, most commonly showing interstitial thickening. Spirometry was also checked in all patients. Lung function
abnormalities were detected in 25.5%. Anomalies were noted in total lung capacity of 4 patients (7.3%), FEV1 of 6 patients
(11%), FVC of 6 patients (11%), DLCO of 9 patients (16%), and small airway function in 7 patients (12%) despite most patients
having no respiratory complaints.[114]
These data are consistent with the findings of a study of 124 patients recovered from COVID-19 after 6 weeks in the
Netherlands. The mean age was 59±14 years and 60% were male; 27 with mild, 51 with moderate, 26 with severe, and 20 with
critical disease. Nearly all patients (99%) had improved imaging, but residual parenchymal abnormalities remained in 91% and
correlated with reduced lung diffusion capacity in 42%. Twenty-two percent had low exercise capacity, 19% low fat-free mass
index, and problems in mental and/or cognitive function were found in 36% of the patients.[115]
The long-term effects of COVID-19 have also been observed after mild infection treated in the outpatient setting. In a
longitudinal cohort study at the University of Washington, 177 participants completed a survey a median of 169 days after their
COVID-19 diagnosis. Almost 85% were never admitted for treatment. One third reported persistent symptoms, and a similar
number reported worsened quality of life. The most common symptom was fatigue.[116]
Public health implications for PASC need to be examined, as reviewed by Datta, et al. As with other infections (eg, Lyme
disease, syphilis, Ebola), late inflammatory and virologic sequelae may emerge. Accumulation of evidence beyond the acute
[Link] 11/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
infection and postacute hyperinflammatory illness is important to evaluate to gain a better understanding of the full spectrum of
the disease.[117]
Thrombotic manifestations of severe COVID-19 are caused by the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to invade endothelial cells via
angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), which is expressed on the surface of endothelial cells. Subsequent endothelial
inflammation, complement activation, thrombin generation, platelet, and leukocyte recruitment, and the initiation of innate and
adaptive immune responses culminate in immunothrombosis, and can ultimately cause microthrombotic complications (eg, DVT,
PE, stroke).[118]
Kotecha et al describe patterns of myocardial injury in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who had elevated troponin
levels. During convalescence, myocarditis-like injury was observed, with limited extent and minimal functional consequence.
However, in a proportion of patients, there was evidence of possible ongoing localized inflammation. Roughly 25% of patients
had ischemic heart disease, of which two-thirds had no previous history.[119]
Reinfection
Clinicians, infectious disease specialists, and public health experts are examining the potential for patient reinfection with the
SARS CoV-2 virus.[120]
Cases of reinfection with SARS CoV-2 have emerged worldwide.[121] Several cases have shown differing viral genomes tested
in the patient, which suggests reinfection rather than prolonged viral shedding.
A case report showed a 42-year-old male who was infected with SARS CoV-2 on March 21, 2020 following a workplace
exposure. The patient had resolution of symptoms after 10 days with continued good health for 51 days. On May 24, 2020, the
patient presented with symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 following a new household exposure. Upon testing via SARS-CoV-2
RT-PCR, the patient had confirmed positive COVID-19 with several potential genetic variations that differed from the SARS-
CoV-2 strain sequenced from the patient in March.[122]
In another case, a 33-year-old male in Hong Kong had contracted COVID-19 in March 2020, which was confirmed via saliva
SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. The patient had resolution of symptoms along with two negative SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results by April
14, 2020. The patient experienced a second episode of COVID-19 in August 2020 following a trip to Spain. Although
asymptomatic, the patient was tested upon returning to Hong Kong and tested positive via SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Genomic
sequencing was performed on both RT-PCR specimens collected in March and August. The genomic analysis showed the two
strains of SARS-CoV-2 (from March and August) belonged to different viral lineages, which suggests that the strain from the first
episode differed from the strain in the second episode.[123]
The Collaborative Study COVID Recurrences (COCOREC) group in France reported 11 virologically-confirmed cases of patients
with a second clinically- and virologically confirmed acute COVID-19 episodes between April 6, 2020 and May 14, 2020.
Although, the letter does not describe confirmation with viral genomic sequencing to understand if the cases were a relapse of
the initial infection or a new infection.[124]
Two cases of reinfection have emerged in the United States, a 25-year-old man from Nevada and a 42-year-old man in Virginia.
These cases were confirmed by gene testing that showed different strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the 2 infection
episodes in each patient. In these cases, the patients experienced more severe symptoms during their second infections. It is
unclear if the symptom severity experienced the second time were related to the virus or the how the patients’ immune systems
reacted. Vaccine development may need to take into account circulating viral strains.[121, 125]
These case reports give insight to the possibility of reinfection. Further research to determine the prevalence of COVID-19
reinfections is needed, including the frequency at which they occur and longevity of COVID-19 immunity.
Workup
Approach Considerations
Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection can be conducted by the CDC, state public health laboratories, hospitals using their
own developed and validated tests, and some commercial reference laboratories.[126]
State health departments with a patient under investigation (PUI) should contact CDC’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) at
770-488-7100 for assistance with collection, storage, and shipment of clinical specimens for diagnostic testing. Specimens from
the upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, and serum should be collected to optimize the likelihood of detection.[98]
[Link] 12/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The FDA now recommends that nasal swabs that access just the front of the nose be used in symptomatic patients, allowing for
(1) a more comfortable and simplified collection method and (2) self-collection at collection sites.[127]
Laboratory Studies
Signs and symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may overlap with those of other respiratory infections; therefore,
it is important to perform laboratory testing to specifically identify symptomatic individuals infected with severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
There are 3 types of tests that may be utilized to determine if an individual has been infected with SARS-CoV-2:
Viral tests (nucleic acid or antigen detection tests) are used to assess acute infection, whereas antibody tests provide evidence
of prior infection with SARS-CoV-2. Home sample collection kits for COVID-19 testing have been available by prescription, in
December 2020, the LabCorp Pixel COVID-19 Test Home Collection Kit became the first to receive an FDA EUA for
nonprescription use.
Leukopenia, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia were common among early cases.[33, 104]
Wu and colleagues[128] reported that, among 200 patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized, older age, neutrophilia, and
elevated lactate dehydrogenase and D-dimer levels increased the risks of ARDS and death.
CT Scanning
Chest computed tomography scanning in patients with COVID-19–associated pneumonia usually shows ground-glass
opacification, possibly with consolidation. Some studies have reported that abnormalities on chest CT scans are usually
bilateral, involve the lower lobes, and have a peripheral distribution. Pleural effusion, pleural thickening, and lymphadenopathy
have also been reported, although with less frequency.[104, 129, 130]
Bai and colleagues reported the following common chest CT scanning features among 201 patients with CT abnormalities and
positive RT-PCR results for COVID-19[131] :
The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends against using CT scanning for screening or diagnosis but instead
reserving it for management in hospitalized patients.[132]
At least two studies have reported on manifestations of infection in apparently asymptomatic individuals. Hu and
colleagues reported on 24 asymptomatic infected persons in whom chest CT scanning revealed ground-glass opacities/patchy
shadowing in 50% of cases.[133] Wang and colleagues reported on 55 patients with asymptomatic infection, two-thirds of
whom had evidence of pneumonia as revealed by CT scanning.[134]
Progression of CT abnormalities
[Link] 13/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Li and colleagues recommend high-resolution CT scanning and reported the following CT changes over time in patients with
COVID-19 among 3 Chinese hospitals:
Early phase: Multiple small patchy shadows and interstitial changes begin to emerge in a distribution beginning near the
pleura or bronchi rather than the pulmonary parenchyma.
Progressive phase: The lesions enlarge and increase, evolving to multiple ground-glass opacities and infiltrating
consolidation in both lungs.
Severe phase: Massive pulmonary consolidations occur, while pleural effusion is rare.
Dissipative phase: Ground-glass opacities and pulmonary consolidations are absorbed completely. The lesions begin
evolving into fibrosis. [135]
Coronal reconstruction chest CT of the same patient above, showing patchy ground-glass opacities.
[Link] 14/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Axial chest CT shows bilateral patchy consolidations (arrows), some with peripheral ground-glass opacity. Findings are in
peripheral and subpleural distribution.
Chest Radiography
In a retrospective study of patients in Hong Kong with COVID-19, common abnormalities on chest radiography, when present,
included consolidation (30 of 64 patients; 47%) and ground-glass opacities (33%). Consolidation was commonly bilateral and of
lower zone distribution. Pleural effusion was an uncommon finding. Severity on chest radiography peaked 10-12 days after
system onset.[136]
The heart is normal in size. There are diffuse, patchy opacities throughout both lungs, which may represent multifocal
viral/bacterial pneumonia versus pulmonary edema. These opacities are particularly confluent along the periphery of the right
lung. There is left midlung platelike atelectasis. Obscuration of the left costophrenic angle may represent consolidation versus
a pleural effusion with atelectasis. There is no pneumothorax.
[Link] 15/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The heart is normal in size. There are bilateral hazy opacities, with lower lobe predominance. These findings are consistent
with multifocal/viral pneumonia. No pleural effusion or pneumothorax are seen.
The heart is normal in size. Patchy opacities are seen throughout the lung fields. Patchy areas of consolidation at the right
lung base partially silhouettes the right diaphragm. There is no effusion or pneumothorax. Degenerative changes of the
thoracic spine are noted.
[Link] 16/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The trachea is in midline. The cardiomediastinal silhouette is normal in size. There are diffuse hazy reticulonodular opacities
in both lungs. Differential diagnoses include viral pneumonia, multifocal bacterial pneumonia or ARDS. There is no pleural
effusion or pneumothorax.
Treatment
Approach Considerations
[Link] 17/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Utilization of programs established by the FDA to allow clinicians to gain access to investigational therapies during the pandemic
has been essential. The expanded access (EA) and emergency use authorization (EUA) programs allowed for rapid deployment
of potential therapies for investigation and investigational therapies with emerging evidence. A review by Rizk et al describes the
role for each of these measures and their importance to providing medical countermeasures in the event of infectious disease
and other threats.[20]
As of October 22, 2020, remdesivir, an antiviral agent, is the only drug fully approved for treatment of COVID-19. It is indicated
for treatment of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized adults and children 12 years and older who weigh at least 40 kg.[21] An
emergency use authorization (EUA) remains in place for treating pediatric patients weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg or children
younger than 12 years who weigh at least 3.5 kg.[22] An EUA for convalescent plasma was announced on August 23, 2020.[23]
Numerous other antiviral agents, immunotherapies, and vaccines continue to be investigated and developed as potential
therapies.
The FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for bamlanivimab on November 9, 2020. The EUA permits
bamlanivimab to be administered for treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults and
pediatric patients with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing who are age 12 years and older weighing at least 40
kg, and at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.[138] An EUA for bamlanivimab plus etesevimab
was issue on February 9, 2021.[139]
An EUA was issued for baricitinib on November 19, 2020 for use, in combination with remdesivir, for treatment of suspected or
laboratory confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitalized patients aged 2 years and older who require
supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).[25]
The FDA has granted EUAs for 3 COVID-19 vaccines since December 2020. Two are mRNA vaccines – BNT-162b2 (Pfizer)
and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), whereas the third is a viral vector vaccine – Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson).
All infected patients should receive supportive care to help alleviate symptoms. Vital organ function should be supported in
severe cases.[26]
Early in the outbreak, concerns emerged about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) potentially increasing the risk of
adverse effects in individuals with COVID-19. However, in late April, the WHO took the position that NSAIDS do not increase the
risk of adverse events or affect acute healthcare utilization, long-term survival, or quality of life.[140]
Numerous collaborative efforts to discover and evaluate effectiveness of antivirals, immunotherapies, monoclonal antibodies,
and vaccines have rapidly emerged. Guidelines and reviews of pharmacotherapy for COVID-19 have been published.[27, 28,
29, 30] The Milken Institute maintains a detailed COVID-19 Treatment and Vaccine Tracker of research and development
progress.
Searching for effective therapies for COVID-19 infection is a complex process. Gordon and colleagues identified 332 high-
confidence SARS-CoV-2 human protein-protein interactions. Among these, they identified 66 human proteins or host factors
targeted by 69 existing FDA-approved drugs, drugs in clinical trials, and/or preclinical compounds. As of March 22, 2020, these
researchers are in the process of evaluating the potential efficacy of these drugs in live SARS-CoV-2 infection assays.[141]
The NIH Accelerating Covid-19 Therapeutics Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) trials public-private partnership to develop a
coordinated research strategy has several ongoing protocols that are adaptive to the progression of standard care.[142]
Another adaptive platform trial is the I-SPY COVID-19 Trial for treating critically ill patients. The clinical trial is designed to allow
numerous investigational agents to be evaluated in the span of 4-6 months, compared with standard of care (supportive care for
ARDS, remdesivir backbone therapy). Depending on the time course of COVID-19 infections across the US. As the trial
proceeds and a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the COVID-19 illness emerges, expanded biomarker and
data collection can be added as needed to further elucidate how agents are or are not working.[143]
How these potential COVID-19 treatments will translate to human use and efficacy is not easily or quickly understood. The
question of whether some existing drugs that have shown in vitro antiviral activity might achieve adequate plasma
pharmacokinetics with current approved doses was examined by Arshad and colleagues. The researchers identified in vitro
anti–SARS-CoV-2 activity data from all available publications up to April 13, 2020, and recalculated an EC90 value for each
drug. EC90 values were then expressed as a ratio to the achievable maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) reported for each
drug after administration of the approved dose to humans (Cmax/EC90 ratio). The researchers also calculated the unbound
drug to tissue partition coefficient to predict lung concentrations that would exceed their reported EC50 levels.[144]
The WHO developed a blueprint of potential therapeutic candidates in January 2020. The WHO embarked on an ambitious
global "megatrial" called SOLIDARITY in which confirmed cases of COVD-19 are randomized to standard care or one of four
active treatment arms (remdesivir, chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon
beta-1a). In early July 2020, the treatment arms in hospitalized patients that included hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, or
lopinavir/ritonavir were discontinued owing to the drugs showing little or no reduction in mortality compared with standard of
care.[145] Interim results released mid-October 2020 found the 4 aforementioned repurposed antiviral agents appeared to have
[Link] 18/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
little or no effect on hospitalized patients with COVID-19, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation, and duration of
hospital stay. The 28-day mortality was 12% (39% if already ventilated at randomization, 10% otherwise).[146]
The urgent need for treatments during a pandemic can confound the interpretation of resulting outcomes of a therapy if data are
not carefully collected and controlled. Andre Kalil, MD, MPH, writes of the detriment of drugs used as a single-group intervention
without a concurrent control group that ultimately lead to no definitive conclusion of efficacy or safety.[147]
Rome and Avorn write about unintended consequences of allowing widening access to experimental therapies. First, efficacy is
unknown and may be negligible, but, without appropriate studies, physicians will not have evidence on which to base
judgement. Existing drugs with well-documented adverse effects (eg, hydroxychloroquine) subject patients to these risks without
proof of clinical benefit. Expanded access of unproven drugs may delay implementation of randomized controlled trials. In
addition, demand for unproven therapies can cause shortages of medications that are approved and indicated for other
diseases, thereby leaving patients who rely on these drugs for chronic conditions without effective therapies.[148]
Drug shortages during the pandemic go beyond off-label prescribing of potential treatments for COVID-19. Drugs that are
necessary for ventilated and critically ill patients and widespread use of inhalers used for COPD or asthma are in demand.[149,
150]
It is difficult to carefully evaluate the onslaught of information that has emerged regarding potential COVID-19 therapies within a
few months’ time in early 2020. A brief but detailed approach regarding how to evaluate resulting evidence of a study has been
presented by F. Perry Wilson, MD, MSCE. By using the example of a case series of patients given hydroxychloroquine plus
azithromycin, he provides clinicians with a quick review of critical analyses.[151]
Related articles
For more information on investigational drugs and biologics being evaluated for COVID-19, see Treatment of Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Investigational Drugs and Other Therapies.
The Medscape article Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) includes discussions of fluid management, noninvasive
ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Some have raised concerns over whether patients with respiratory distress have presentations more like those of high-altitude
pulmonary edema (HAPE) than ARDS.
See also the articles Viral Pneumonia, Respiratory Failure, Septic Shock, and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in Sepsis.
Ventilator Management
Ventilator Graphics
Mechanical Ventilation: Initial Ventilator Settings
Mechanical Ventilation: Alternative Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
Mechanical Ventilation: Rapid Sequence Intubation
[Link] 19/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Prevention
The FDA has granted EUAs for 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines since December, 2020. Two are mRNA vaccines – BNT-162b2 (Pfizer)
and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), whereas the third is a viral vector vaccine – Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson).
General measures for prevention of viral respiratory infections include the following[26] :
Handwashing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. An alcohol-based hand sanitizer may be used if soap and
water are unavailable.
Individuals should avoid touching their eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands.
Individuals should avoid close contact with sick people.
Sick people should stay at home (eg, from work, school).
Coughs and sneezes should be covered with a tissue, followed by disposal of the tissue in the trash.
Frequently touched objects and surfaces should be cleaned and disinfected regularly.
The CDC has recommended the below measures to mitigate community spread.[9, 152, 153]
All individuals in areas with prevalent COVID-19 should be vigilant for potential symptoms of infection and should stay home as
much as possible, practicing social distancing (maintaining a distance of 6 feet from other persons) when leaving home is
necessary.
Persons with an increased risk for infection—(1) individuals who have had close contact with a person with known or suspected
COVID-19 or (2) international travelers (including travel on a cruise ship)—should observe increased precautions. These include
(1) self-quarantine for at least 2 weeks (14 days) from the time of the last exposure and distancing (6 feet) from other persons at
all times and (2) self-monitoring for cough, fever, or dyspnea with temperature checks twice a day.
On April 3, 2020, the CDC issued a recommendation that the general public, even those without symptoms, should begin
wearing face coverings in public settings where social-distancing measures are difficult to maintain in order to abate the spread
of COVID-19.[9]
Facemasks
In a 2020 study on the efficacy of facemasks in preventing acute respiratory infection, surgical masks worn by patients with such
infections (rhinovirus, influenza, seasonal coronavirus [although not SARS-CoV-2 specifically]) were found to reduce the
detection of viral RNA in exhaled breaths and coughs. Specifically, surgical facemasks were found to significantly decreased
detection of coronavirus RNA in aerosols and influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets. The detection of coronavirus RNA in
respiratory droplets also trended downward. Based on this study, the authors concluded that surgical facemasks could prevent
the transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza when worn by symptomatic persons and that this may have implications
in controlling the spread of COVID-19.[154]
In a 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis, Smith and colleagues found that N95 respirators did not confer a significant
advantage over surgical masks in protecting healthcare workers from transmissible acute respiratory infections.[155]
PUL-042
PUL-042 (Pulmotech, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Texas A&M) is a solution for nebulization with potential
immunostimulating activity. It consists of two toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands: Pam2CSK4 acetate (Pam2), a TLR2/6 agonist, and
the TLR9 agonist oligodeoxynucleotide M362.
PUL-042 binds to and activates TLRs on lung epithelial cells. This induces the epithelial cells to produce peptides and reactive
oxygen species (ROS) against pathogens in the lungs, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. M362, through binding of the CpG
motifs to TLR9 and subsequent TLR9-mediated signaling, initiates the innate immune system and activates macrophages,
natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells; stimulates interferon-alpha production; and induces a T-helper
1 cells–mediated immune response. Pam2CSK4, through TLR2/6, activates the production of T-helper 2 cells, leading to the
production of specific cytokines.[156]
In May 2020, the FDA approved initiation of two COVID-19 phase 2 clinical trials of PUL-042 at up to 20 US sites. The trials are
for the prevention of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the prevention of disease progression in patients with early COVID-19. In
the first study, up to 4 doses of PUL-042 or placebo will be administered to 200 participants via inhalation over a 10-day period
to evaluate the prevention of infection and reduction in severity of COVID-19. In the second study, 100 patients with early
[Link] 20/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
symptoms of COVID-19 will receive PUL-042 up to 3 times over 6 days. Each trial will monitor participants for 28 days to assess
effectiveness and tolerability.[157, 158]
Antiviral Agents
Remdesivir
Remdesivir (Veklury) was the first drug approved by the FDA for treating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is indicated for treatment of
COVID-19 disease in hospitalized adults and children aged 12 years and older who weigh at least 40 kg. The broad-spectrum
antiviral is a nucleotide analog prodrug.[21] Full approval was preceded by the US FDA issuing an EUA (emergency use
authorization) on May 1, 2020.[159] Upon approval of remdesivir in adults and adolescents, the EUA was updated to maintain
the ability for prescribers to treat pediatric patients weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg or children younger than 12 years who
weigh at least 3.5 kg.[22]
The remdesivir EUA was expanded to include moderate disease August 28, 2020. This expands the previous authorization to
treat all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 regardless of oxygen status.[160] A new drug application (NDA) for remdesivir was
submitted to the FDA in August 2020. A phase 1b trial of an inhaled nebulized version was initiated in late June 2020 to
determine if remdesivir can be used on an outpatient basis and at earlier stages of disease.[161] As of October 1, 2020,
remdesivir is available from the distributor (ie, AmerisourceBergen). Wholesale acquisition cost is approximately $520/100-mg
vial, totaling $3,120 for a 5-day treatment course.
Several phase 3 clinical trials have tested remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19. Positive results were seen with remdesivir after
use by the University of Washington in the first case of COVID-19 documented on US soil in January 2020.[162] An adaptive
randomized trial of remdesivir coordinated by the National Institute of Health (NCT04280705) was started first against placebo,
but additional therapies were added to the protocol as evidence emerged and treatment evolved. The first experience with this
study involved passengers of the Diamond Princess cruise ship in quarantine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in
February 2020 after returning to the United States from Japan following an on-board outbreak of COVID-19.[163] Trials of
remdesivir for moderate and severe COVID-19 compared with standard of care and varying treatment durations are ongoing.
The initial EUA for remdesivir was based on preliminary data analysis of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT), and
was announced April 29, 2020. The final analysis included 1,062 hospitalized patients with advanced COVID-19 and lung
involvement, showing that patients treated with 10-days of remdesivir had a 31% faster time to recovery than those who
received placebo (remdesivir, 10 days; placebo, 15 days; P < 0.001). Patients with severe disease (n = 957) had a median time
to recovery of 11 days compared with 18 days for placebo. A statistically significant difference was not reached for mortality by
day 15 (remdesivir 6.7% vs placebo 11.9%) or by day 29 (remdesivir 11.4% vs placebo 15.2%).[164]
The final ACTT-1 results for shortening the time to recovery differed from interim results from the WHO SOLIDARITY trial for
remdesivir. These discordant conclusions are complicated and confusing as the SOLIDARITY trial included patients from ACTT-
1.[146] An editorial by Harrington and colleagues[165] notes the complexity of the SOLIDARITY trial and the variation within
and between countries in the standard of care and in the burden of disease in patients who arrive at hospitals. The authors also
mention that trials solely focused on remdesivir were able to observe nuanced outcomes (ie, ability to change the course of
hospitalization), whereas the larger, simple randomized SOLIDARITY trial focused on more easily defined outcomes.
The open-label phase 3 SIMPLE trial (n = 397) in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 disease not requiring mechanical
ventilation showed similar improvement in clinical status with the 5-day remdesivir regimen compared with the 10-day regimen
on day 14 (odds ratio, 0.75). After adjustment for imbalances in baseline clinical status, patients receiving a 10-day course of
remdesivir had a distribution in clinical status at day 14 that was similar to that of patients receiving a 5-day course (P = 0.14).
The findings could significantly expand the number of patients who could be treated with the current supply of remdesivir. The
trial is continuing with an enrollment goal of 6,000 patients.[166]
Similarly, the phase 3 SIMPLE II trial in patients with moderate COVID-19 disease (n = 596) showed that 5 days of remdesivir
treatment had a statistically significant higher odds of a better clinical status distribution on Day 11 compared with those
receiving standard care (odds ratio, 1.65; P = 0.02). Improvement on Day 11 did not differ between the 10-day remdesivir group
and standard of care (P = 0.18).[167]
Remdesivir emergency use authorization includes pediatric dosing that was derived from pharmacokinetic data in healthy
adults. Remdesivir has been available through compassionate use to children with severe COVID-19 since February 2020. A
phase 2/3 trial (CARAVAN) of remdesivir was initiated in June 2020 to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy
in children with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. CARAVAN is an open-label, single-arm study of remdesivir in children from birth
to age 18 years.[168]
[Link] 21/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Data were presented on compassionate use of remdesivir in children at the virtual COVID-19 Conference held July 10-11, 2020.
Most of the 77 children with severe COVID-19 improved with remdesivir. Clinical recovery was observed in 80% of children on
ventilators or ECMO and in 87% of those not on invasive oxygen support.[169]
Outcomes in the first 86 pregnant women who were treated with remdesivir (March 21 to June 16, 2020)found high recovery
rates. Recovery rates were high among women who received remdesivir (67 while pregnant and 19 on postpartum days 0-3).
No new safety signals were observed. At baseline, 40% of pregnant women (median gestational age, 28 weeks) required
invasive ventilation compared with 95% of postpartum women (median gestational age at delivery 30 weeks). Among pregnant
women, 93% of those on mechanical ventilation were extubated, 93% recovered, and 90% were discharged. Among postpartum
women, 89% were extubated, 89% recovered, and 84% were discharged. There was 1 maternal death attributed to underlying
disease and no neonatal deaths.[170]
Data continue to emerge. A case series of 5 patients describes successful treatment and monitoring throughout treatment with
remdesivir in pregnant women with COVID-19.[171]
Investigational Antivirals
Molnupiravir
Molnupiravir (MK-4482 [previously EIDD-2801]; Merck) is an oral antiviral agent that is a prodrug of the nucleoside derivative
N4-hydroxycytidine. It elicits antiviral effects by introducing copying errors during viral RNA replication of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Preliminary results from the phase 2a dose-ranging study showed at an average of 10 days after symptom onset, 24% of
patients in the placebo group remained culture positive for SARS-CoV-2; whereas, no infectious virus could be recovered at
study day 5 in any molnupiravir-treated patients. The drug is entering phase 3 trials in Q4 2020 for hospitalized and
nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19.[172, 173]
Favipiravir
Favipiravir (Avigan; Appili Therapeutics) is an oral antiviral approved for treatment of influenza in Japan. It is approved in Russia
for treatment of COVID-19.
Favipiravir selectively inhibits RNA polymerase, which is necessary for viral replication. An adaptive, multicenter, open label,
randomized, phase 2/3 clinical trial of favipiravir compared with standard of care I hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19
was conducted in Russia. Both dosing regimens of favipiravir demonstrated similar virologic response. Viral clearance on Day 5
was achieved in 25/40 (62.5%) patients on in the favipiravir group compared with 6/20 (30%) patients in the standard care group
(P = 0.018). Viral clearance on Day 10 was achieved in 37/40 (92.5%) patients taking favipiravir compared with 16/20 (80%) in
the standard care group (P = 0.155).[174]
In the United States, the phase 3 PRESECO (Preventing Severe COVID Disease) study is evaluating use in patients with mild-
to-moderate symptoms to prevent disease progression and hospitalization. The phase 3 PEPCO (Post Exposure Prophylaxis for
COVID-19) study will look at asymptomatic individuals with direct exposure (within 72 hours) to an infected individual. A study in
hospitalized patients is also underway.[175, 176] Additionally, the phase 2 CONTROL study is evaluating use to control
outbreaks of COVID-19 in Canadian long-term care facilities.[177]
Nitazoxanide
Nitazoxanide extended-release tablets (NT-300; Romark Laboratories) inhibit replication of a broad range of respiratory viruses
in cell cultures, including SARS-CoV-2. Two phase 3 trials for prevention of COVID-19 are being initiated in high-risk
populations, including elderly residents of long-term care facilities and healthcare workers. In addition to the prevention studies,
a third trial for early treatment of COVID-19 is planned.[178, 179] Another multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study
was initiated in August 2020 for treatment of people aged 12 years and older with fever and respiratory symptoms consistent
with COVID-19. Efficacy analyses will examine those participants who have laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.[180]
Niclosamide
Niclosamide (FW-1002 [FirstWave Bio]; ANA001 [ ANA Therapeutics]) is an anthelmintic agent used primarily for tapeworms for
nearly 50 years. Niclosamide is thought to disrupt SARS-CoV-2 replication through S-phase kinase-associated protein 2
(SKP2)-inhibition, by preventing autophagy and blocking endocytosis.
A proprietary formulation that targets the viral reservoir in the gut to decrease prolonged infection and transmission has been
developed, specifically to decrease gut viral load. It is being tested in a phase 2 trial.[181] A phase 2/3 trial is testing safety and
the potential to improved outcomes and reduce hospital stay by reducing viral load.[182]
[Link] 22/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
In October 2020, the NIH launched an adaptive phase 3 trial (ACTIV-Immune Modulators [IM]) to assess safety and efficacy of 3
immune modulator agents in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. The three drugs are infliximab (Remicade), abatacept
(Orencia), and cenicriviroc, a late-stage investigational drug for hepatic fibrosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
[142]
Infliximab
Monoclonal antibody that inhibits TNF, a proinflammatory cytokine that may cause excess inflammation during advanced stages
of COVID-19. Initially approved in 1998 to treat various chronic autoimmune inflammatory diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis,
psoriasis, inflammatory bowel diseases).
Abatacept
Selective T-cell costimulatory immunomodulator. The drug consists of the extracellular domain of human cytotoxic T cell-
associated antigen 4 fused to a modified immunoglobulin. It works by preventing full activation of T cells, resulting in inhibition of
the downstream inflammatory cascade.
Cenicriviroc
An immunomodulator that blocks 2 chemokine receptors, CCR2 and CCR5, shown to be closely involved with the respiratory
sequelae of COVID-19 and of related viral infections. It is also part of the I-SPY COVID-19 clinical trial.[143]
Interleukin Inhibitors
Interleukin (IL) inhibitors may ameliorate severe damage to lung tissue caused by cytokine release in patients with serious
COVID-19 infections. Several studies have indicated a “cytokine storm” with release of IL-6, IL-1, IL-12, and IL-18, along with
tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and other inflammatory mediators. The increased pulmonary inflammatory response may
result in increased alveolar-capillary gas exchange, making oxygenation difficult in patients with severe illness.
IL-6 is a pleiotropic proinflammatory cytokine produced by various cell types, including lymphocytes, monocytes, and fibroblasts.
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a dose-dependent production of IL-6 from bronchial epithelial cells. This cascade of events is the
rationale for studying IL-6 inhibitors.[185]
Tocilizumab has been studied in several phase 3 clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy plus standard of care in
hospitalized adults with COVID-19 pneumonia compared to placebo plus standard of care. Average wholesale price of
tocilizumab is approximately $5000 for an 800-mg dose. Preliminary results for sarilumab have also been reported.
The Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines recommend tocilizumab in addition to standard of care (ie, steroids)
among hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who have elevated markers of systemic inflammation.[28] The NIH guidelines
recommend use of tocilizumab (single IV dose of 8 mg/kg, up to 800 mg) in combination with dexamethasone in recently
hospitalized patients who are exhibiting rapid respiratory decompensation caused by COVID-19.[186] These recommendations
are based on the paucity of evidence from randomized clinical trials to show certainty of mortality reduction.
The EMPACTA trial found nonventilated hospitalized patients who received tocilizumab (n = 249) in the first 2 days of ICU
admission had a lower risk of progression to mechanical ventilation or death by day 28 compared with those not treated with
tocilizumab (n = 128) (12% vs 19.3% respectively). The data cutoff for this study was September 30, 2020. In the 7 days before
the trial or during the trial, 200 patients in the tocilizumab group (80.3%) and 112 patients in the placebo group (87.5%) received
systemic glucocorticoids and 55.4% and 67.2% of the patients received dexamethasone. Antiviral treatment was administered in
[Link] 23/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
196 (78.7%) and 101 (78.9%), respectively, and 52.6% and 58.6% received remdesivir. However, there was no difference in
incidence of death from any cause between the 2 groups.[187]
Preliminary results from the REMAP-CAP international adaptive trial evaluated efficacy of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (n = 353),
sarilumab 400 mg (n = 48), or control (n = 402) in critically ill hospitalized adults receiving organ support in intensive care.
Hospital mortality at day 21 was 28% (98/350) for tocilizumab, 22.2% (10/45) for sarilumab, and 35.8% (142/397) for control. Of
note, corticosteroids became part of the standard of care midway through the trial. Estimates of the treatment effect for patients
treated with either tocilizumab or sarilumab and corticosteroids in combination were greater than for any single intervention.[188]
The US-based trial (n = 194) for sarilumab was stopped in July 2020 after observing positive trends in the primary prespecified
analysis group (critical patients on 400 mg who were mechanically ventilated at baseline) did 48), not reach statistical
significance and these were countered by negative trends in a subgroup of critical patients who were not mechanically ventilated
at baseline.
The RECOVERY trial assessed use of 4,116 hospitalized adults with COVID-19 infection who received either tocilizumab (n =
2,022) compared with standard of care (n = 2,094) in the UK from April 23, 2020 to January 24, 2021. Among participants, 562
(14%) received invasive mechanical ventilation, 1686 (41%) received non-invasive respiratory support, and 1868 (45%)
received no respiratory support other than oxygen. Median C-reactive protein was 143 mg/L and 3385 (82%) patients were
receiving systemic corticosteroids at randomization. Preliminary results show 596 (29%) of patients allocated to tocilizumab and
694 (33%) allocated to usual care died within 28 days (p = 0.007). Tocilizumab mortality benefits were clearly seen among those
who also received systemic corticosteroids. Patients in the tocilizumab group were more likely to be discharged from the
hospital within 28 days (54% vs 47; p < 0.0001). Among those not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, patients
who received tocilizumab were less likely to reach the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (33% vs
38%; p = 0.0005).[189]
Results from early trials produced conflicting results. The dynamic changes and knowledge of treatment that took place during
these trials (eg, ventilatory support, medications) and varying degrees of diseases severity causes added dimensions to
consider. Several of these initial studies are discussed.
Results from the BACC Bay randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (n = 243; conducted between April 20 to June 15,
2020) found tocilizumab was not effective in preventing intubation or death in nonventilated hospitalized patients with moderate
COVID-19 disease. The researchers point out that the confidence interval for efficacy comparisons were wide, so some benefit
or harm is uncertain. Additionally, results of the ACTT-1 trial for remdesivir were release during the trial, so some patients
received remdesivir. The RECOVERY trial results for dexamethasone had not been released, so no patients received
dexamethasone. Other antiviral or glucocorticoid therapies were permitted.[190]
Results from the COVACTA randomized controlled phase 3 trial included approximately 38% mechanically ventilated patients.
The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improved clinical status in patients with COVID-19–associated pneumonia or the
secondary endpoint of reduced patient mortality. The trial did show a positive trend in time to hospital discharge among patients
who received tocilizumab.[191]
An observational study of 239 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 was conducted at Yale (New Haven, CT). Patients
were treated with a standardized algorithm that included tocilizumab to treat cytokine release syndrome. These early
observations showed that, despite a surge of hospitalizations, tocilizumab-treated patients (n = 153) comprised 90% of those
with severe disease, but their survival rate was similar to that in patients with nonsevere disease (83% vs 91%; P = 0.11). In
tocilizumab-treated patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the survival rate was 75%. Oxygenation and inflammatory
biomarkers (eg, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6) improved; however, D-dimer and soluble IL-2 receptor levels increased
significantly.[192] Similarly, a small compassionate use study (n = 27) found that a single 400-mg IV dose of tocilizumab reduced
inflammation, oxygen requirements, vasopressor support, and mortality.[193]
A study compared outcomes of patients who received tocilizumab (n = 78) with tocilizumab-untreated controls in patients with
COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. Tocilizumab was associated with a 45% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio,
0.55) and improved status on the ordinal outcome scale (odds ratio per one-level increase, 0.59). Tocilizumab was associated
with an increased incidence of superinfections (54% vs 26%; P< 0.001); however, there was no difference in 28-day case fatality
rate among tocilizumab-treated patients with superinfection versus those without superinfection (22% vs 15%; P = 0.42).[194]
Interleukin-1 inhibitors
Endogenous IL-1 levels are elevated in individuals with COVID-19 and other conditions, such as severe CAR-T-cell–mediated
cytokine-release syndrome. Anakinra has been used off-label for this indication. As of June 2020, the NIH guidelines note
insufficient data to recommend for or against use of IL-1 inhibitors.[195]
Several studies involving the IL-1 inhibitor anakinra (Kineret) have emerged. A retrospective study in Italy looked at patients with
COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS who were managed with noninvasive ventilation outside of the ICU. The study
compared outcomes of patients who received anakinra (5 mg/kg IV BID [high-dose] or 100 mg SC BID [low-dose]) plus standard
[Link] 24/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
treatment (ie, hydroxychloroquine 200 mg PO BID and lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg PO BID) with standard of care alone.
At 21 days, treatment with high-dose anakinra was associated with reductions in serum C-reactive protein levels and
progressive improvements in respiratory function in 21 (72%) of 29 patients; 5 (17%) patients were on mechanical ventilation
and 3 (10%) died. In the standard treatment group, 8 (50%) of 16 patients showed respiratory improvement at 21 days; 1 (6%)
patient was on mechanical ventilation and 7 (44%) died. At 21 days, survival was 90% in the high-dose anakinra group and 56%
in the standard treatment group (P = 0.009).[196]
A study in Paris from March 24 to April 6, 2020, compared outcomes of 52 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were given
anakinra with 44 historical cohort patients. Admission to the ICU for invasive mechanical ventilation or death occurred in 13
(25%) patients in the anakinra group and 32 (73%) patients in the historical group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; P< 0.0001). Similar
results were observed for death alone (HR, 0.30; P = 0.0063) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation alone (HR, 0.22; P =
0.0015).[197]
The phase 3 CAN-COVID investigating canakinumab plus standard of care did not meet its primary endpoint of a greater
chance of patient survival without the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or its key secondary endpoint of reduced COVID-
19 mortality, compared with standard of care.[198]
Interleukin-7 inhibitors
The recombinant interleukin-7 inhibitor, CYT107 (RevImmune), increases T-cell production and corrects immune exhaustion.
Several phase 2 clinical trials have been completed in France, Belgium, and the UK to assess immune reconstitution in
lymphopenic patients with COVID-19.[199, 200, 201] Phase 2 trials were initiated in November 2020 in the United States.
Drugs that target numb-associated kinase (NAK) may mitigate systemic and alveolar inflammation in patients with COVID-19
pneumonia by inhibiting essential cytokine signaling involved in immune-mediated inflammatory response. In particular, NAK
inhibition has been shown to reduce viral infection in vitro. ACE2 receptors are a point of cellular entry by COVID-19, which is
then expressed in lung AT2 alveolar epithelial cells. A known regulator of endocytosis is the AP2-associated protein kinase-1
(AAK1). The ability to disrupt AAK1 may interrupt intracellular entry of the virus. Baricitinib (Olumiant; Eli Lilly Co), a Janus
kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is also identified as a NAK inhibitor with a particularly high affinity for AAK1.[202, 203, 204]
Emergency use authorization (EUA) was issued by the FDA for baricitinib on November 19, 2020. The EUA is for use, in
combination with remdesivir, for treatment of suspected or laboratory confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in
hospitalized patients 2 years and older who require supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation (ECMO).[25]
Mehta and colleagues[205] describe the cytokine profile of COVID-19 as being similar to that of hemophagocytic
lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). sHLH is characterized by increased IL-2, IL-7, GCSF, INF-gamma, monocyte chemoattractant
protein 1 (MCP1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP-1) alpha, and TNF-alpha. JAK inhibition may be a therapeutic
option.
The NIAID Adaptive Covid-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT-2) evaluated the combination of baricitinib (4 mg PO daily up to 14 days)
and remdesivir (100 mg IV daily up to 10 days) (515 patients) compared with remdesivir plus placebo (518 patients). Patients
who received baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days compared with 8 days with control (P = 0.03), and a 30%
higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15. Those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at
enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51).
The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65). Incidence
of serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; P = 0.03)
There were also fewer new infections in patients who received baricitinib (5.9% vs. 11.2%; P =0 .003).[206]
Another phase 3, placebo-controlled trial (COV-BARRIER) is studying baricitinib in hospitalized patients who have an elevated
level of at least one inflammation marker but do not require invasive mechanical ventilation at study entry.[207]
A prospective observational study at a single hospital in Spain from March 15 to April 26, 2020 compared addition of baricitinib
or baricitinib plus corticosteroids to standard treatment regimens of patients admitted with moderate-to-severe SARS-CoV-2
pneumonia. Patients received lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine as part of their standard therapy during the study.
Among 876 patients admitted during the study, 558 had respiratory insufficiency (SpO2 92% or less breathing room air). After
excluding patients for various reasons, 112 patients were analyzed. A greater improvement in SpO2/FiO2 from hospitalization to
discharge was observed in the baricitinib plus corticosteroid group (n = 62) compared with the corticosteroid group (n = 50) (p <
0.001).[208]
A small open-labeled study (n = 12) conducted in Italy added baricitinib 4 mg/day to existing therapies (ie, lopinavir/ritonavir 250
mg BID and hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day). All therapies were given for 2 weeks. Fever, SpO2, PaO2/FiO2, C-reactive
protein, and modified early warning scores significantly improved in the baricitinib-treated group compared with controls (P:
0.000; 0.000; 0.017; 0.023; 0.016, respectively). ICU transfer occurred in 33% (4/12) of controls and in none of the baricitinib-
[Link] 25/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
treated patients (P = 0.093). Discharge at week 2 occurred in 58% (7/12) of the baricitinib-treated patients compared with 8%
(1/12) of controls (P = 0.027).[209]
Pacritinib (CTI Biopharma) is a JAK2, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 (IRAK-1), and colony stimulating factor-1
receptor (CSF-1R) inhibitor that is pending FDA approval for myelofibrosis. The phase 3 trial (PRE-VENT) has commenced to
compare pacritinib with standard of care. Outcomes assessed include progression to mechanical ventilation, ECMO, or death in
hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, including those with cancer. As a JAK2/IRAK-1 inhibitor, pacritinib may ameliorate
the effects of cytokine storm via inhibition of IL-6 and IL-1 signaling. Furthermore, as a CSF-1R inhibitor, pacritinib may mitigate
effects of macrophage activation syndrome.[210]
A phase 2 trial is underway in the UK for a nebulized JAK inhibitor (TD-0903; Theravance Biopharma) to treat hospitalized
patients with acute lung injury caused by COVID-19. Preclinical studies suggest that TD-0903 has a very high lung:plasma ratio
and rapid metabolic clearance resulting in low systemic exposure, compatible with its lung selectivity.[211]
Corticosteroids
The UK RECOVERY trial assessed the mortality rate at day 28 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received low-dose
dexamethasone 6 mg PO or IV daily for 10 days added to usual care. Patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone (n =
2104) plus usual care or usual care alone (n = 4321). Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110
patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (P< 0.001). In the dexamethasone group, the
incidence of death was lower than in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs
41.4%) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs 26.2%), but not among those who
were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs 14%).[212]
Corticosteroids are not generally recommended for treatment of viral pneumonia.[213] The benefit of corticosteroids in septic
shock results from tempering the host immune response to bacterial toxin release. The incidence of shock in patients with
COVID-19 is relatively low (5% of cases). It is more likely to produce cardiogenic shock from increased work of the heart need to
distribute oxygenated blood supply and thoracic pressure from ventilation. Corticosteroids can induce harm through
immunosuppressant effects during the treatment of infection and have failed to provide a benefit in other viral epidemics, such
as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, influenza infection, SARS, and MERS.[214]
Early guidelines for management of critically ill adults with COVID-19 specified when to use low-dose corticosteroids and when
to refrain from using corticosteroids. The recommendations depended on the precise clinical situation (eg, refractory shock,
mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS); however, these particular recommendations were based on evidence listed as
weak.[215] The results from the RECOVERY trial in June 2020 provided evidence for clinicians to consider when low-dose
corticosteroids would be beneficial.[212]
Several trials examining use of corticosteroids for COVID-19 were halted after publication of the RECOVERY trial results;
however, a prospective meta-analysis from the WHO rapid evidence appraisal for COVID-19 therapies (REACT) pooled data
from 7 trials (eg, RECOVERY, REMAP-CAP, CoDEX, CAP COVID) that totaled 1703 patients (678 received corticosteroids and
1025 received usual care or placebo). An association between corticosteroids and reduced mortality was similar for
dexamethasone and hydrocortisone, suggesting the benefit is a general class effect of glucocorticoids. The 28-day mortality
rate, the primary outcome, was significantly lower among corticosteroid users (32% absolute mortality for corticosteroids vs 40%
assumed mortality for controls).[216] An accompanying editorial addresses the unanswered questions regarding these studies.
[217]
The WHO guidelines for use of dexamethasone (6 mg IV or oral) or hydrocortisone (50 mg IV every 8 hours) for 7-10 days in the
most seriously ill patients coincides with publication of the meta-analysis.[218]
A study describing clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 was conducted in Wuhan, China (N = 201). Eighty-
four patients (41.8%) developed ARDS, and of those, 44 (52.4%) died. Among patients with ARDS, treatment with
methylprednisolone decreased the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.38).[128]
Researchers at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit implemented a protocol on March 20, 2020, using early, short-course,
methylprednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day divided in 2 IV doses for 3 days in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Outcomes
of pre- and post-corticosteroid groups were evaluated. A composite endpoint of escalation of care from ward to ICU, new
requirement for mechanical ventilation, or mortality was the primary outcome measure. All patients had at least 14 days of
follow-up. They analyzed 213 eligible patients, 81 (38%) and 132 (62%) in pre-and post-corticosteroid groups, respectively. The
composite endpoint occurred at a significantly lower rate in the post-corticosteroid group than in the pre-corticosteroid group
(34.9% vs 54.3%; P = 0.005). This treatment effect was observed within each individual component of the composite endpoint.
A significant reduction in median hospital length of stay was observed in the post-corticosteroid group (8 vs 5 days; P< 0.001).
[219]
A study in the Netherlands showed that a 5-day course of high-dose corticosteroids accelerated respiratory recovery, lowered
hospital mortality rates, and reduced the likelihood of mechanical ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19–associated
cytokine storm syndrome compared with historical controls. Forty-three percent of patients also received tocilizumab.[220]
[Link] 26/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
A retrospective study at Montefiore Hospital in the Bronx borough of New York was conducted to evaluate if early glucocorticoid
treatment (ie, within 48 hours of admission) reduced mortality rates or the need for mechanical ventilation in hospitalized
patients with COVID-19. Of the 1,806 patients included in the study, 140 (7.7%) were treated with glucocorticoids, and 1,666
patients never received glucocorticoids. A key finding of this analysis is the need to verify which patients should receive
glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid use in patients with initial C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of 20 mg/dL or greater was
associated with significantly reduced risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 0.23), whereas use in patients with a
CRP level of less than 10 mg/dL was associated with significantly increased risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (odds
ratio, 2.64).[221]
An investigational suprapharmacologic dexamethasone sodium phosphate formulation (AVM0703; Seattle AVM Biotechnology)
is starting in phase 1 and 2 trials to determine how it quickly it mobilizes natural killer T- (NKT), cytotoxic T-, and dendritic cells to
treat ARDS.[222]
Convalescent Plasma
The FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) on August 23, 2020 for use of convalescent plasma in hospitalized
patients with COVID-19. Convalescent plasma contains antibody-rich plasma products collected from eligible donors who have
recovered from COVID-19. An expanded access (EA) program for convalescent plasma was initiated in early April 2020.[23,
223] The Mayo Clinic coordinated the open-access COVID-19 expanded access program, but discontinued enrollment on
August 28, as the FDA authorized emergency use. For further information regarding administration, see the EUA COVID-19
Convalescent Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers.
A retrospective analysis of a US national registry determined the anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels in convalescent plasma
used to treat hospitalized adults with Covid-19. The primary outcome was death within 30 days after plasma transfusion. Among
patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who were not receiving mechanical ventilation, transfusion of plasma with higher anti–
SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titers was associated with a lower risk of death than transfusion of plasma with lower antibody levels.
Among 3082 patients in the analysis, death within 30 days occurred in 115 of 515 patients (22.3%) in the high-titer group, 549 of
2006 patients (27.4%) in the medium-titer group, and 166 of 561 patients (29.6%) in the low-titer group. High plasma titer
defined as 250 or greater in the Broad Institute’s neutralizing antibody assay or an S/C cutoff of 12 or higher in the Ortho
VITROS IgG assay.[224]
NIH guidelines
The NIH COVID-19 Guidelines Panel further evaluated the Mayo Clinic’s EAP data and further reviewed subgroups. Among
patients who were not intubated, 11% of those who received convalescent plasma with high antibody titers died within 7 days of
transfusion compared with 14% of those who received convalescent plasma with low antibody titers. Among those who were
intubated, there was no difference in 7-day survival. Based on the available evidence, as of August 27, 2020, the panel
concluded there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of
COVID-19.[225]
The NIH halted its trial of convalescent plasma in emergency departments for treatment of patients with mild symptoms as of
March 2021. The second planned interim analysis of the trial data determined that while the convalescent plasma intervention
caused no harm, it was unlikely to benefit this group of patients.
IDSA guidelines
IDSA recommends limiting use of convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 to the context of a clinical trial.
Convalescent plasma transfusion failed to show or to exclude a beneficial or detrimental effect on mortality based on the body of
evidence.[28]
Interferons
Laboratory studies suggest normal interferon response is suppressed in some people infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the
laboratory, type 1 interferon can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 and two closely related viruses, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.[226]
The third iteration of the NIAID’s Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT-3) commenced in August 2020 to compare
subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (Rebif) plus remdesivir versus remdesivir plus placebo. The ACTT-3 trial anticipates enrolling
over 1000 patients in up to 100 sites across the United States.[227]
Miscellaneous Therapies
Nitric Oxide
Published findings from the 2004 SARS-CoV infection suggest the potential role of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO; Mallinckrodt
Pharmaceuticals, plc) as a supportive measure for treating infection in patients with pulmonary complications. Treatment with
[Link] 27/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
iNO reversed pulmonary hypertension, improved severe hypoxia, and shortened the length of ventilatory support compared with
matched control patients with SARS.[228]
The phase 3 study (COViNOX) for iNO (INOpulse; Bellerophon Therapeutics) for patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who
are hospitalized and require supplemental oxygen has been put on hold after interim analysis from the first 100 patients. The
study has recruited nearly 200 patients as of November 2020.[229] The Society of Critical Care Medicine recommends against
the routine use of iNO in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Instead, they suggest a trial only in mechanically ventilated
patients with severe ARDS and hypoxemia despite other rescue strategies.[215] The cost of iNO is reported as exceeding
$100/hour.
Statins
In addition to the cholesterol-lowering abilities of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), they also decrease the inflammatory
processes of atherosclerosis.[230] Because of this, questions have arisen whether statins may be beneficial to reduce
inflammation associated with COVID-19.
This question has been posed before with studies of patients taking statins who have acute viral infections. Virani[231] provides
a brief summary of information regarding observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statins and viral infections.
Some, but not all, observational studies suggest that cardiovascular outcomes were reduced in patients taking statins who were
hospitalized with influenza and/or pneumonia. RCTs of statins as anti-inflammatory agents for viral infections are limited, and
results have been mixed. An important factor that Virani points out regarding COVID-19 is that no harm was associated with
statin therapy in previous trials of statins and viral infections, emphasizing that patients should adhere to their statin regimen.
Two meta-analyses have shown opposing conclusions regarding outcomes of patients who were taking statins at the time of
COVID-19 diagnosis.[232, 233] Randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the ability of statins to attenuate
inflammation, presumably by inhibiting expression of the MYD88 gene, which is known to trigger inflammatory pathways.[234]
Vitamin and mineral supplements have been promoted for the treatment and prevention of respiratory viral infections; however,
there is insufficient evidence to suggest a therapeutic role in treating COVID-19.[235]
Zinc
A retrospective analysis showed lack of a causal association between zinc and survival in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
[236]
Vitamin D
A study found individuals with untreated vitamin D deficiency were nearly twice as likely to test positive for COVID-19 compared
with peers with adequate vitamin D levels. Among 489 individuals, vitamin D status was categorized as likely deficient for 124
participants (25%), likely sufficient for 287 (59%), and uncertain for 78 (16%). Seventy-one participants (15%) tested positive for
COVID-19. In a multivariate analysis, a positive COVID-19 test was significantly more likely in those with likely vitamin D
deficiency than in those with likely sufficient vitamin D levels (relative risk, 1.77; P = .02). Testing positive for COVID-19 was also
associated with increasing age up to age 50 years (relative risk, 1.06; P = .02) and race other than White (relative risk, 2.54; P =
.009).[237]
Tradipitant
Tradipitant (Vanda Pharmaceuticals) is an NK-1 receptor antagonist. The NK-1 receptor is genetically coded by TACR1 and it is
the main receptor for substance P. The substance P NK-1 receptor system is involved in neuroinflammatory processes that lead
to serious lung injury following numerous insults, including viral infections. ODYSSEY phase 3 trial in severe or critical COVID-
19 infection reported an interim analysis on August 18, 2020. Patients who received tradipitant recovered earlier than those
receiving placebo.[238, 239]
Aprepitant
Aprepitant (Cinvanti; Heron Therapeutics) is a substance P/neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist. Substance P and its
receptor, NK1, are distributed throughout the body in the cells of many tissues and organs, including the lungs. Phase 2 clinical
study (GUARDS-1) initiated mid-July 2020 in early-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Administration to these patients is
[Link] 28/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
expected to decrease production and release of inflammatory cytokines mediated by the binding of substance P to NK1
receptors, which could prevent the progression of lung injury to ARDS.[240]
Colony-stimulator factors
Sargramostim
Sargramostim (Leukine, rhuGM-CSF; Partner Therapeutics, Inc) is an inhaled colony-stimulating factor presently in a phase 2
trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (iLeukPulm). GM-CSF may reduce the risk of secondary infection, accelerate
removal of debris caused by pathogens, and stimulate alveolar epithelial cell healing during lung injury.[241]
Gimsilumab
Gimsilumab (Riovant Sciences) is being studied in the phase 2 BREATHE clinical trial at Mt Sinai and Temple University is
analyzing monoclonal antibody that targets granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with ARDS.
[242, 243]
Mavrilimumab
Mavrilimumab (Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals) is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that targets granulocyte macrophage colony-
stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor alpha. An open-label study of mavrilimumab in Italy treated patients with severe COVID-19
pneumonia and hyperinflammation. Over the 14-day follow-up period, mavrilimumab-treated patients experienced greater and
earlier clinical improvements than control-group patients, including earlier weaning from supplemental oxygen, shorter
hospitalizations, and no deaths. Phase 2 trials are ongoing in the United States.[244, 245]
Otilimab
Otilimab (GlaxoSmithKline) is a humanized monoclonal anti-GM-CSF antibody under development for rheumatoid arthritis. A
clinical trial is ongoing for severe pulmonary COVID-19.[246]
Lenzilumab
Lenzilumab (Humanigen) is a monoclonal antibody directed against GM-CSF. A phase 3 trial of hospitalized patients at 15 US
sites was about halfway through the 300-patient enrollment mark as of early August 2020.[247]
TJM2
TJM2 (I-MAB Biopharma) is a neutralizing antibody against human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-
CSF), an important cytokine that plays a critical role in acute and chronic inflammation.[248]
Remestemcel-L
Remestemcel-L (Ryoncil; Mesoblast Ltd) is an allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) product currently pending FDA
approval for graft versus host disease (GVHD). On December 1, 2020, the FDA granted Fast Track designation for
remestemcel-L in the treatment of ARDS due to COVID-19 infection. Fast Track designation is granted if a therapy
demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for a serious or life-threatening disease.[249]
As of December 2020, the phase 3 trial for COVID-19 ARDS has enrolled about 200 of the goal of 300 ventilator-dependent
patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. The trial’s primary endpoint is overall mortality at Day 30, and the key secondary
endpoint is days alive off ventilatory support through Day 60. Two interim analyses by the independent Data Safety Monitoring
Board (DSMB) were completed after 90 and 135 patients were enrolled, with recommendations to continue the trial as planned.
A third and final interim analysis is planned when 180 patients have completed 30 days of follow-up. A pilot study under
emergency compassionate use at New York’s Mt Sinai Hospital in March-April this year showed 9 of 12 ventilator-dependent
patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS were successfully discharged from hospital a median of 10 days after
receiving 2 intravenous doses of remestemcel-L. Theorized mechanism is down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines.[249,
250]
PLX-PAD
PLX-PAD (Pluristem Therapeutics) contains allogeneic mesenchymal-like cells with immunomodulatory properties that induce
the immune system’s natural regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages. Initiating phase 2 study in mechanically ventilated
patients with severe COVID-19.[251]
[Link]
[Link] 29/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
[Link] (NantKwest, Inc) is a bone marrow-derived allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell product. IND for phase 1b trial
initiating Q2 2020 in Los Angeles area hospitals.[252]
HB-adMSC
Autologous, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (HB-adMSCs; Hope Biosciences) has been shown to attenuate systemic
inflammation in phase 1/2 clinical trial for rheumatoid arthritis. Three phase 2 trials are in progress that include patients aged 50
years and older with preexisting health conditions or at high exposure risk, frontline healthcare workers or first responders, and
a placebo-controlled study.[253]
hCT-MSCs
A multicenter trial using human cord tissue mesenchymal stromal cells (hCT-MSC) for children with multisystem inflammatory
syndrome (MIS) was initiated in September 2020. The study will assess if infusion of hCT-MSCs are safe and can suppress the
hyperinflammatory response associated with MIS. Duke University is coordinating the study, and is manufacturing the cells at
the Robertson GMP cell laboratory.[254]
ExoFlo
ExoFlo (Direct Biologics) is a paracrine signaling exosome product isolated from human bone marrow MSCs. The EXIT COVID-
19 phase 2 study is enrolling patients and was granted expanded access by the FDA to be provided to patients with ARDS.[255]
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors
Ibudilast
Ibudilast (MN-166; MediciNova) is a first-in-class, orally bioavailable, small molecule phosphodiesterases (PDE) 4 and 10
inhibitor and a macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) inhibitor that suppresses proinflammatory cytokines and promotes
neurotrophic factors. The drug has been approved in Japan and South Korea since 1989 to treat post-stroke complications and
bronchial asthma. An IND for a phase 2 trial in the United States to prevent ARDS has been accepted by the FDA.[256]
Apremilast
Apremilast (Otezla; Amgen Inc) is a small-molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) specific for cyclic adenosine
monophosphate (cAMP). PDE4 inhibition results in increased intracellular cAMP levels, which may indirectly modulate the
production of inflammatory mediators. Part of the I-SPY COVID-19 clinical trial.[143]
Table 1. Investigational Drugs for ARDS/Cytokine Release Associated With COVID-19 (Open Table in a new window)
Therapy Description
Ifenprodil (NP-120; N-methyl-d-aspartate (NDMA) receptor glutamate receptor antagonist. NMDA is linked to
Algernon inflammation and lung injury. An injectable and long-acting oral product are under production to
begin clinical trials for COVID-19 and acute lung injury. The phase 2b part of the 2b/3 study
Pharmaceuticals) [257] completed enrollment mid-December 2020.
Modulates activity of terminal complement to prevent the formation of the membrane attack
Eculizumab (Soliris; complex; 10-patient proof of concept completed; if 100-patient single-arm trial in the United
Alexion) [258] States and Europe for 2 weeks shows a positive risk/benefit ratio, a 300-patient randomized
controlled trial will proceed.
[Link] 30/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
ATYR1923 (aTyr Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at up to 10 centers in the United
States. In preclinical studies, ATYR1923 (a selective modulator of neuropilin-2) has been shown
Pharma, Inc) [263] to down-regulate T-cell responses responsible for cytokine release.
BIO-11006 (Biomark Results of a phase 2a study for 38 ventilated patients with ARDS showed 43% reduction at day
28 in the all-cause mortality rate. This study was initiated in 2017. The company is in discussion
Pharmaceuticals) [264] with the FDA to proceed with a phase 3 trial.
Dociparstat sodium Glycosaminoglycan derivative of heparin with anti-inflammatory properties, including the
(DSTAT; Chimerix) potential to address underlying causes of coagulation disorders. Phase 2/3 trial starting May
[265] 2020.
Orally administered sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2) inhibitor that may inhibit viral replication and
Opaganib (Yeliva; reduce levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha. Nonclinical data indicate both antiviral and anti-
RedHill Biopharma inflammatory effects. As of December 2020, the phase 2/3 trial has enrolled more than 60% of
Ltd) [266, 267] participants, who are hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who have developed
pneumonia and require supplemental oxygen.
Tranexamic acid Oral/enteral protease inhibitor designed to preserve GI tract integrity and protect organs from
(LB1148; Leading proteases leaking from compromised mucosal barrier that can lead to ARDS. Phase 2 study
BioSciences, Inc) [268] announced May 15, 2020.
DAS181 (Ansun Recombinant sialidase drug is a fusion protein that cleaves sialic receptors. Phase 3 substudy
Biopharma) [269] for COVID-19 added to existing study for parainfluenza infection.
AT-001 (Applied Aldose reductase inhibitor shown to prevent oxidative damage to cardiomyocytes and to
Therapeutics) [270] decrease oxidative-induced damage.
Calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channel inhibitor that prevents CRAC channel
overactivation, which can cause pulmonary endothelial damage and cytokine storm. Results in
mid-July 2020 from a small randomized, controlled, open-label study showed CM4620-IE (n =
CM4620-IE (Auxora; 20) combined with standard of care therapy (n = 10) improved outcomes in patients with severe
CalciMedica, Inc) [271] COVID-19 pneumonia, showing faster recovery (5 days vs 12 days), reduced use of invasive
mechanical ventilation (18% vs 50%), and improved mortality rate (10% vs 20%) compared with
standard of care alone. Part 2 of this trial will start late summer and will be a placebo-controlled
trial, possibly including both remdesivir and dexamethasone.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist. Received FDA may proceed letter
to initiate phase 2 study. Acute lung injury induces up-regulation of transient receptor potential
Intranasal vazegepant (TRP) channels, activating CGRP release. CGRP contributes to acute lung injury (pulmonary
(Biohaven edema with acute-phase cytokine/mediator release, with immunologic milieu shift toward TH17
Pharmaceuticals) [272] cytokines). A CGRP receptor antagonist may blunt the severe inflammatory response at the
alveolar level, delaying or reversing the path toward oxygen desaturation, ARDS, requirement
for supplemental oxygenation, artificial ventilation, or death.
[Link] 31/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
Selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) that blocks the cellular protein exportin 1 (XPO1),
Selinexor (Xpovio; which is involved in both replication of SARS-CoV-2 and the inflammatory response to the
Karyopharma virus. An interim analysis indicated that the trial was unlikely to meet its prespecified primary
endpoint across the entire patient population studied, and has since been discontinued.
Therapeutics) [273] However, the results demonstrated encouraging antiviral and anti-inflammatory activity for a
subset of treated patients with low baseline LDH or D-dimer.
EDP1815 (Evelo
Phase 2/3 trials underway in the United States and United Kingdom to determine if early
Biosciences; Rutgers
intervention with oral EDP1815 (under development for psoriasis) prevents progression of
University; Robert
COVID-19 symptoms and complications in hospitalized patients ≥15 years with COVID-19 who
Wood Johnson
presented at the ER within the preceding 36 hours. The drug showed marked activity on
University Hospital)
[274, 275]
inflammatory markers (eg, IL-6, IL-8, TNF, IL-1b) in a phase 1b study.
Microtubule depolymerization agent that has broad antiviral activity and has strong anti-
VERU-111 (Veru, Inc)
[276] inflammatory effects. As of August 2020, a phase 2 trial is underway for hospitalized patients
with COVID-19 at high risk for ARDS.
Vascular leakage
therapy (Q BioMed;
Targets the angiopoietin-Tie2 signaling pathway to reduce endothelial dysfunction.
Mannin Research)
[277]
Trans sodium
crocetinate (TSC;
Diffusion TSC increases the diffusion rate of oxygen in aqueous solutions. Guidance has been received
from the FDA for a phase 1b/2b clinical trial.
Pharmaceuticals) [278,
279]
OP-101 (Ashvattha
Selectively targets reactive macrophages to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress.
Therapeutics) [282]
Vidofludimus calcium Oral dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor. DHODH is located on the outer surface
(IMU-838; Immunic of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Inhibitors of this enzyme are used to treat autoimmune
diseases. Phase 2 CALVID-1 clinical trial for hospitalized patients with moderate COVID-19.
Therapeutics) [283, Another phase 2 trial (IONIC) in the UK combines vidofludimus with oseltamivir for moderate-to-
284]
severe COVID-19.
Vafidemstat (ORY- Oral CNS lysine-specific histone demethylase 1 (LSD1) inhibitor. Phase 2 trial (ESCAPE)
2001; Oryzon) [285] initiated in May 2020 to prevent progression to ARDS in severely ill patients with COVID-19.
[Link] 32/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
Aspartyl-alanyl Low-molecular weight fraction of human serum albumin (developed for inflammation associated
diketopiperazine (DA- with osteoarthritis). Theorized to reduce inflammation by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine
DKP; AmpionTM; production in T-cells. Phase 1 trial results of IV Ampion or standard of care (eg, remdesivir
Ampio and/or convalescent plasma) were evaluated in September 2020. IND granted for phase 1 trial
Pharmaceuticals) [289] of inhaled Ampion in September 2020.
Selective inhibitor of p38alpha/beta mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), which is known to
Losmapimod (Fulcrum mediate acute response to stress, including acute inflammation. FDA authorized a phase 3 trial
Therapeutics) [290] (LOSVID) for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at high risk. Losmapimod has been evaluated
in phase 2 clinical trials for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
Endogenous epigenetic regulator. Preclinical trials have shown the drug regulates lipid
DUR-928 (Durect metabolism, inflammation, and cell survival. The FDA accepted the IND application. A phase 2
Corp) [291] study is planned for approximately 80 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who have acute liver
or kidney injury.
IND approved mid-June 2020 for use in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. ATI-450 is an oral
mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MAPKAPK2, or MK2) inhibitor that
ATI-450 (Aclaris
targets inflammatory cytokine expression. In a phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers at the
Therapeutics, Inc)
[292] University of Kansas Medical Center, researchers used a first-in-human study using an ex vivo
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation model that demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction of
TNF-alpha, IL-1-beta, IL-6, and IL-8.
CCR5 antagonist. A phase 2 trial for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 is ongoing. The phase 3 trial in
severe-to-critical patients is fully enrolled (n = 390) as of December 2020 and an open-label
Leronlimab (Vyrologix; extension trial has been added to the protocol. Laboratory data following leronlimab
CytoDyn) [293, 294] administration in 15 patients showed increased CD8 T-lymphocyte percentages by day 3,
normalization of CD4/CD8 ratios, and resolving cytokine production, including reduced IL-6
levels correlating with patient improvement.
Sarconeos (BIO101; Activates MAS, a component of the protective arm of the renin angiotensin system. Phase 2/3
Biophytis SA) [295] trial (COVA) international trial assessing potential treatment for ARDS.
Abivertinib (Sorrento Tyrosine kinase inhibitor with dual selective targeting of mutant forms of EGFR and BTK. Phase
2 trial starting late July 2020 in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 who
Therapeutics) [296] have developing cytokine storm in the lungs.
Immunotherapy that targets the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1)
Nangibotide (LR12; protein pathway, a factor causing unbalanced inflammatory responses. Phase 2a clinical trial
(ASTONISH) authorized in the United States, France, and Belgium for mechanically ventilated
Inotrem S.A.) [297] patients with COVID-19 who have systemic inflammation. Previous clinical studies demonstrated
safety and tolerability in patients with septic shock.
[Link] 33/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
Piclidenoson (Can- A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonist that elicits anti-inflammatory effects. Phase 2 trial
planned in the United States to start late July 2020 involving hospitalized patients with moderate
Fite BioPharma) [298] COVID-19.
LSALT peptide LSALT peptide that targets dipeptidase-1 (DPEP1), which is a vascular adhesion receptor for
neutrophil recruitment in the lungs, liver, and kidney. The first US phase 2 trial will be at Broward
(MetaBlokTM; Arch
Health Medical Center in Florida to treat complications in patients with COVID-19, including
Biopartners) [299] prevention of acute lung and/or kidney injury.
RLS-0071 (ReAlta Animal model shows that RLS-0071 decreases inflammatory cytokines IL-1b, IL-6, and TNF-
alpha. A phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is planned to begin Q3 2020
Life Sciences) [300] in adults with COVID-19 pneumonia and early respiratory failure.
Antifibrotic agent. Targets a specific group of cysteine proteases called dimeric calpains
BLD-2660 (Blade (calpains 1, 2 and 9). Overactivity of dimeric calpains lead to inflammation and fibrosis. Phase 2
Therapeutics) [301] trial (CONQUER) in hospitalized patients (n = 120) with COVID pneumonia completed in
September 2020.
Preclinical studies observed EC-18 to control neutrophil infiltration, thereby modulating the
EC-18 (Enzychem inflammatory cytokine and chemokine signaling. A phase 2 multicenter, randomized, double-
Lifesciences) [302] blind, placebo-controlled study is being initiated in the US to evaluate the safety and efficacy of
EC-18 in preventing the progression of COVID-19 infection to severe pneumonia or ARD.
Bacille Calmette-
Guérin (BCG) vaccine
(Baylor, Texas A&M,
and Harvard Areas with existing BCG vaccination programs appear to have lower incidence and mortality
Universities; MD from COVID19. Study administers BCG vaccine to healthcare workers to see if reduces infection
Anderson and and disease severity during SARS-CoV-2 epidemic.
Cedars-Sinai Medical
Centers) [304]
ARDS-003 (Tetra Bio- Cannabinoid that specifically targets CB2 receptor. Phase 1 clinical trial planned to evaluate
Pharma) [305] anti-inflammatory properties and reduce cytokine release to prevent ARDS.
Icatibant (Firazyr;
Takeda Competitive antagonist selective for bradykinin B2 receptor. Bradykinin formation results in
vascular leakage and edema. Part of the I-SPY COVID-19 clinical trial.
Pharmaceuticals) [143]
[Link] 34/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
Razuprotafib (AKB- Tie2 activator that enhances endothelial function and stabilizes blood vessels, including
9778; Aerpio pulmonary and renal vasculature. SC razuprotafib restores Tie2 activation and improves
vascular stability in multiple animal models of vascular injury and inflammation, including
Pharmaceuticals) [143] lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary and renal injury, polymicrobial sepsis, and IL-2 induced
cytokine storm. Part of the I-SPY COVID-19 clinical trial.
Synthetic retinoid shown to address the complex links between fatty acids metabolism and
Fenretinide (LAU-7b; inflammatory signaling, which is distinct from the retinoid class MOA. Believed to work by
Laurent modulating key membrane lipids in conjunction with proinflammatory pathways (eg, ERK1/2, NF-
Pharmaceuticals) [307] kappa-B, and cPLA2) needed for coronavirus entry, replication, and host defense evasion. It
may also have antiviral properties. The phase 2 RESOLUTION trial in Canada has also gained
FDA approval in August 2020 for an IND in the US.
Ebselen (SPI-1005; Anti-inflammatory molecule that mimics and induces glutathione peroxidase. It reduces reactive
Sound oxygen and nitrogen species by first binding them to selenocysteine, and then reducing the
selenic acid intermediate through a reduction with glutathione. May also inhibit viral replication.
Pharmaceuticals) [308] Phase 2 studies for moderate and severe COVID-19 infection initiated in Fall 2020.
Fostamatinib Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor that reduces signaling by Fc gamma receptor (FcγR) and
(Tavalisse; Rigel c-type lectin receptor (CLR), which are drivers of proinflammatory cytokine release. It also
reduces mucin-1 protein abundance, which is a biomarker used to predict ARDS development.
Pharmaceuticals) [309] Clinical trial initiated at the NIH clinical center.
Oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor designed to mimic the
Vadadustat (Akebia physiologic effect of altitude on oxygen availability and increased RBC production. Approved in
Japan for anemia owing to chronic kidney disease (in phase 3 trials in US). Phase 2 trial initiated
Therapeutics) [310] at U of Texas Health Center in Houston for prevention and treatment of ARDS in hospitalized
patients with COVID-19.
Ultramicronized
palmitoylethanolamide Fatty acid amide studied for its anti-inflammatory and analgesic actions. Phase 2a trial expected
(PEA; FSD201; FSD to begin in October 2020 for hospitalized patients with documented COVID-19 disease.
Pharma) [311]
Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) inhibitor. TLR4 is a key component of the innate immune system
EB05 (Edesa Biotech)
[312] which functions to detect molecules generated by pathogens, acting upstream of cytokine storm
and IL-6-mediated acute lung injury.
Lanadelumab mAb that targets kallikrein. Inhibits kallikrein proteolytic activity to control excess bradykinin. Part
of the COVID R&D alliance (Amgen, UCB SA, Takeda) to identify drugs that can reduce severity
(Takeda) [314] of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients by moderating the immune system.
Macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement C5. Part of the COVID R&D alliance (Amgen, UCB
Zilucoplan (UCB SA)
[314] SA, Takeda) to identify drugs that can reduce severity of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients by
moderating the immune system.
[Link] 35/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Therapy Description
Ensifentrine (Verona Phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 and 4 inhibitor. Elicits both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory
activities. Delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler. Phase 2 trial in 45 patients completed
Pharma) [316] January 2021.
TZLS-501 (Tiziana
Anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody in early development.
Life Sciences) [317]
Investigational Immunotherapies
Bucillamine
Bucillamine (Revive Therapeutics) is an antirheumatic agent derived from tiopronin. It has been available in Japan and South
Korea for over 30 years. N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) has been shown to significantly attenuate clinical symptoms in respiratory viral
infections in animals and humans, primarily via donation of thiols to increase antioxidant activity of cellular glutathione.
Bucillamine has 2 thiol groups and its ability as a thiol donor is estimated to be 16 times that of NAC. A phase 3 confirmatory
trial for treatment of outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 at 10 sites in the US planned for Q1 2021 with enrollment goal
of 1000 participants.[318]
MK-7110
MK-7110 (formerly CD24Fc; Merck) is a biological immunomodulator in Phase II/III clinical trial stage. It is a fusion protein
comprised of the nonpolymorphic regions of CD24 attached to the Fc region of human IgG1. An interim analysis in September
2020 of data from the Phase 3 trial (SAC-COVID) in 243 participants (full enrollment) indicated that hospitalized patients with
COVID-19 treated with a single dose of MK-7110 showed a 60% higher probability of improvement in clinical status compared to
placebo, as defined by the protocol. The risk of death or respiratory failure was reduced by more than 50%.[319]
Information, including allocation, for monoclonal antibody treatments for COVID-19 granted emergency use authorization is
located at the United States Public Health Emergency webpage.
Owing to the increase in variants of concern (VOC) in the United States, monoclonal antibodies that have gained emergency
use authorization have been tested to evaluate activity against VOCs. As of March 24, 2021, distribution has ceased of
bamlanivimab alone. Consider use of etesevimab plus bamlanivimab, or casirivimab plus imdevimab in outpatients who qualify
for monoclonal antibodies.
Bamlanivimab
March 24, 2021: No longer recommended as monotherapy owing to viral variants that are resistant to bamlanivimab.
Bamlanivimab (LY-CoV555; Eli Lilly & Co, AbCellera) is neutralizing IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the spike
protein of SARS-CoV-2. It is designed to block viral attachment and entry into human cells, thus neutralizing the virus, potentially
preventing and treating COVID-19.
[Link] 36/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The FDA issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for bamlanivimab on November 9, 2020. The EUA permits
bamlanivimab to be administered for treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) in adults and pediatric
patients with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing who are age 12 years and older weighing at least 40 kg, and at
high risk of progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.[138]
The NIH COVID-19 Guidelines Panel issued a statement regarding use of bamlanivimab, including that it should not be
considered standard of care. The Panel emphasizes the possibility of a limited supply of bamlanivimab, as well as challenges
distributing and administering the drug, recommends only patients at highest risk for COVID-19 progression should be prioritized
for the drug through the EUA. Additionally, communities most affected by COVID-19 should have equitable access to
bamlanivimab.[320]
An interim analysis from the Blocking Viral Attachment and Cell Entry with SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies (BLAZE-1)
provided the basis of support for the EUA. In this phase 2/3 trial, bamlanivimab given to people recently diagnosed with COVID-
19 in the ambulatory setting showed a reduced rate of hospitalization or ER visits compared with placebo. Patients who received
bamlanivimab monotherapy or placebo were enrolled first (June 17-August 21, 2020) followed by patients who received
bamlanivimab plus etesevimab or placebo (August 22-September 3). An EUA was granted for this combination in February
2021. Bamlanivimab can be used alone or together with etesevimab, but etesevimab can only be used with bamlanivimab.[321]
The FDA issued an EUA for etesevimab (LY-CoV016; Eli Lilly & Co, AbCellera) on February 9, 2021. The EUA permits use in
combination with bamlanivimab or treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID19 in adults and adolescents who are at high risk for
progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.
In this arm of the phase 3 BLAZE-1 trial, the change in log viral load from baseline at day 11 was -3.72 for bamlanivimab 700
mg, -4.08 for bamlanivimab 2800 mg, -3.49 for bamlanivimab 7000 mg, -4.37 for combination treatment, and -3.80 for placebo.
Among nonhospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 illness, treatment with bamlanivimab plus etesevimab,
compared with placebo, was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load at day 11; however, no
significant difference in viral load reduction was observed for bamlanivimab monotherapy. No difference in hospitalization rate
was observed between bamlanivimab monotherapy or with the combination. Based on an analysis of available data, the
authorized dosage regimen of the combination is bamlanivimab 700 mg plus etesevimab 1400 mg administered together as a
single IV infusion. This regimen is expected to have similar clinical effects as the 2800 mg dosages evaluated in the study.[322]
A Phase 3 study of bamlanivimab monotherapy for prevention of COVID-19 in residents and staff at long-term care facilities
(BLAZE-2).[323] Bamlanivimab is also being tested in the National Institutes of Health-led ACTIV-2 studies of ambulatory
patients with COVID-19. Bamlanivimab is no longer part of the NIH ACTIV-3 trial studying patients who are hospitalized with
more advanced COVID-19 disease, as benefit was not observed.[142]
Weekly bamlanivimab allocation to states and territories can be located on the US Government Public Health Emergency
website. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced they will pay $309 for an infusion, and once the
government purchased supply is exhausted, they will pay for the product at 95% of the average wholesale price.
An EUA was issued for coadministration of the monoclonal antibodies casirivimab and imdevimab (REGN-COV; Regeneron) on
November 21, 2020 for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older who
weigh at least 40 kg and are at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.[24] The mixture is designed
to bind to 2 points on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. As with bamlanivimab, administration of casirivimab and imdevimab has
not shown benefit in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.
The study in hospitalized patients was changed in late October 2020 to allow enrollment only in hospitalized patients with low or
no oxygen requirements.[324, 325] However, casirivimab and imdevimab did show reduced viral levels and improved
symptoms in nearly 800 non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease in a phase 2/3 trial. Results showed treatment with
the 2 antibodies reduced COVID-19 related medical visits by 57% through day 29 (2.8% combined dose groups; 6.5% placebo;
p = 0.024). In high risk patients (1 or more risk factor including age older than 50 years; body mass index greater than 30;
cardiovascular, metabolic, lung, liver or kidney disease; or immunocompromised status) COVID-19 related medical visits were
reduced by 72% (p = 0.0065).[326, 327]
A phase 3 trial (n = 4,567) in infected outpatients who were at high risk for hospitalization or severe COVID-19 disease found
casirivimab plus imdevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization or death. Risk was decreased by 70% with the 1200
mg IV dose (n = 827) and by 71% with 2400 mg IV (n = 1,849) compared with placebo (n = 1,843).[328]
An ongoing phase 1/2/3 clinical trial of the antibody cocktail in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease requiring low-flow
oxygen found encouraging results. Patients who had not yet mounted their own immune response to SARS-CoV-2 (ie,
[Link] 37/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
seronegative for antibodies at baseline) had a lower risk of death or progression to mechanical ventilation after receiving
casirivimab and imdevimab (hazard ratio, 0.78). Risk of death or mechanical ventilation decreased by approximately 50% after 1
week following treatment with the antibody cocktail. Seronegative patients (n = 217) had much higher viral loads than those who
had already developed their own antibodies (seropositive [n = 270]) to SARS-CoV-2 at the time of randomization. In
seronegative patients, the antibody cocktail reduced the time-weighted average daily viral load through day 7 by -0.54 log10
copies/mL, and through day 11 by -0.63 log10 copies/mL (nominal p = 0.002 for combined doses). As expected, the clinical and
virologic benefit of the antibody cocktail was limited in seropositive patients.[329] A larger trial will be required to confirm these
initial observations. The ongoing UK-based RECOVERY trial continues to enroll hospitalized patients to receive casirivimab and
imdevimab.
Investigational Vaccines
The genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was published on January 11, 2020. The rapid emergence of research and collaboration
among scientists and biopharmaceutical manufacturers followed. Various methods are used for vaccine discovery and
manufacturing. As of December 9, 2020, The New York Times Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker lists 58 vaccines in human trials and
at least 86 preclinical vaccines are under investigation in animals.[330]
In addition to the complexity of finding the most effective vaccine candidates, the production process is also important for
manufacturing the vaccine to the scale needed globally. Other variable that increase complexity of distribution include storage
requirements (eg, frozen vs refrigerated) and if more than a single injection is required for optimal immunity. Several
technological methods (eg, DNA, RNA, inactivated, viral vector, protein subunit) are available for vaccine development. Vaccine
attributes (eg, number of doses, speed of development, scalability) depends on the type of technological method employed. For
example, the mRNA vaccine platforms allow for rapid development.[331, 332]
Several vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are in, or have completed, phase 3 clinical trials in the United States. The FDA granted
Emergency Use Authorization for the BNT-162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients aged 16 years and older on December 11,
2020. The FDA issued an EUA for a second vaccine (mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) on December 18, 2020. Phase 1a of
vaccine distribution is expected to focus on healthcare workers and residents of long-term care facilities. ACIP has published
guidelines on the ethical principles for the initial allocation for this scarce resource.[333]
Antithrombotics
COVID-19 is a systemic illness that adversely affects various organ systems. A review of COVID-19 hypercoagulopathy aptly
describes both microangiopathy and local thrombus formation, and a systemic coagulation defect leading to large vessel
thrombosis and major thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism, in critically ill patients.[334] While sepsis
is recognized to activate the coagulation system, the precise mechanism by which COVID-19 inflammation affects coagulopathy
is not fully understood.[335]
Several retrospective cohort studies have described use of therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulant doses in critically ill
hospitalized patients with COVID-19. No difference in 28-day mortality was observed for 46 patients empirically treated with
therapeutic anticoagulant doses compared with 95 patients who received standard DVT prophylaxis doses, including those with
D-dimer levels greater than 2 mcg/mL. In this study, day 0 was the day of intubation, therefore, they did not evaluate all patients
who received empiric therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of diagnosis to see if progression to intubation was improved.[336]
In contrast to the above findings, a retrospective cohort study showed a median 21 day survival for patients requiring
mechanical ventilation who received therapeutic anticoagulation compared with 9 days for those who received DVT prophylaxis.
[337]
NIH Trial
Current guidelines include thrombosis prophylaxis (typically with low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH]) for hospitalized
patients. As of September 2020, the NIH ACTIV trial includes an arm (ACTIV-4) for use of antithrombotics in the outpatient,
inpatient, and convalescent settings.[142]
The 3 adaptive clinical trials within ACTIV-4 include preventing, treating, and addressing COVID-19-associated coagulopathy
(CAC). Additionally, a goal to understand the effects of CAC across patient populations – inpatient, outpatient, and
convalescent.[142]
In December 2020, the ACTIV-4 trial enrolling critically ill patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit supports was
paused owing to a potential for harm in this subgroup. Whether the use of full-dose compared to low-dose anticoagulants leads
[Link] 38/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
to better outcomes in hospitalized patients with less COVID-19 severe disease remains a very important question.
Outpatient trial
Investigates whether anticoagulants or antithrombotic therapy can reduce life-threatening cardiovascular or pulmonary
complications in newly diagnosed patients with COVID-19 who do not require hospital admission. Participants will be
randomized to take either a placebo, aspirin, or a low or therapeutic dose of apixaban.
Inpatient trial
Investigates an approach aimed at preventing clotting events and improving outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Varying doses of unfractionated heparin or LMWH will be evaluated on ability to prevent or reduce blood clot formation.
Convalescent trial
Investigates safety and efficacy anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets administered to patients who have been discharged from the
hospital or are convalescing in reducing thrombotic complications (eg, MI, stroke, DVT, PE, death). Patients will be assessed for
these complications within 45 days of being hospitalized for moderate and severe COVID-19.
Investigational antithrombotics
AB201
AB201 (ARCA Biopharma) is a recombinant nematode anticoagulant protein c2 (rNAPc2) that specifically inhibits tissue factor
(TF)/factor VIIa complex and has anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, and potential antiviral properties. TF plays a central role in
inflammatory response to viral infections. Phase 2b/3 clinical trial (ASPEN-COVID-19) started in December 2020 in hospitalized
patients with COVID-19 at the University of Colorado. The phase 2b trial randomizes 2 AB201 dosage regimens compared with
heparin. The primary endpoint is change in D-dimer level from baseline to Day 8. The phase 3 trial design is contingent upon
phase 2b results.[338]
The first randomized study to compare continuing vs stopping (ACEIs) or ARBs receptor for patients with COVID-19 has shown
no difference in key outcomes between the 2 approaches. A similar 30-day mortality rate was observed for patients who
continued and those who suspended ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy, at 2.8% and 2.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.97).[340]
One hypothesis suggests that use of these drugs could be harmful by increasing the expression of ACE2 receptors
(which the SARS-CoV-2 virus uses to gain entry into cells), thus potentially enhancing viral binding and viral entry.
The other suggests that ACE inhibitors and ARBs could be protective by reducing production of angiotensin II and
enhancing the generation of angiotensin 1-7, which attenuates inflammation and fibrosis and therefore could attenuate
lung injury.
Concern arose regarding appropriateness of continuation of ACEIs and ARBs in patients with COVID-19 after early reports
noted an association between disease severity and comorbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes,
which are often treated with ACEIs and ARBs. The reason for this association remains unclear.[342, 343]
The speculated mechanism for detrimental effect of ACEIs and ARBs is related to ACE2. It was therefore hypothesized that any
agent that increases expression of ACE2 could potentially increase susceptibility to severe COVID-19 by improving viral cellular
entry;[343] however, physiologically, ACE2 also converts angiotensin 2 to angiotensin 1-7, which leads to vasodilation and may
protect against lung injury by lowering angiotensin 2 receptor binding.[342, 344] It is therefore uncertain whether an increased
expression of ACE2 receptors would worsen or mitigate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 in human lungs.
Vaduganathan and colleagues note that data in humans are limited, so it is difficult to support or negate the opposing theories
regarding RAAS inhibitors. They offer an alternate hypothesis that ACE2 may be beneficial rather than harmful in patients with
lung injury. As mentioned, ACE2 acts as a counterregulatory enzyme that degrades angiotensin 2 to angiotensin 1-7. SARS-
[Link] 39/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
CoV-2 not only appears to gain initial entry through ACE2 but also down-regulates ACE2 expression, possibly mitigating the
counterregulatory effects of ACE2.[345]
There are also conflicting data regarding whether ACEIs and ARBs increase ACE2 levels. Some studies in animals have
suggested that ACEIs and ARBs increase expression of ACE2,[346, 347, 348] while other studies have not shown this effect.
[349, 350]
As controversy remains regarding whether ACEIs and/or ARBs increase ACE2 expression and how this effect may influence
outcomes in patients with COVID-19, cardiology societies have largely recommended against initiating or discontinuing these
medications based solely on active SARS-CoV-2 infection.[351, 352]
Two clinical trials are currently in development at the University of Minnesota evaluating the use of losartan in patients with
COVID-19 in inpatient and outpatient settings.[353, 354] Results from these trials will provide insight into the potential role of
ARBs in the treatment of COVID-19.
SARS-CoV-2 is known to utilize angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors for entry into target cells. Insulin
administration attenuates ACE2 expression, while hypoglycemic agents (eg, glucagonlike peptide 1 [GLP-1] agonists,
thiazolidinediones) up-regulate ACE2.[357] Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) is highly involved in glucose and insulin metabolism,
as well as in immune regulation. This protein was shown to be a functional receptor for Middle East respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and protein modeling suggests that it may play a similar role with SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible
for COVID-19.[358]
The relationship between diabetes, coronavirus infections, ACE2, and DPP-4 has been reviewed by Drucker.[356] Important
clinical conclusions of the review include the following:
Hospitalization is more common for acute COVID-19 among patients with diabetes and obesity.
Diabetic medications need to be reevaluated upon admission.
Insulin is the glucose-lowering therapy of choice, not DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists, in patients with
diabetes who are hospitalized with acute COVID-19.
On June 15, 2020, the FDA revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine donated to
the Strategic National Stockpile to be used for treating certain hospitalized patients with COVID-19 when a clinical trial was
unavailable or participation in a clinical trial was not feasible.[359]
Based on its ongoing analysis of the EUA and emerging scientific data, the FDA determined that hydroxychloroquine is unlikely
to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA. Additionally, in light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse
events and other potential serious adverse effects, the known and potential benefits of hydroxychloroquine no longer outweigh
the known and potential risks for the EUA.
Although additional clinical trials may continue to evaluate potential benefit, the FDA determined the EUA was no longer
appropriate.
Additionally, the NIH halted the Outcomes Related to COVID-19 treated with Hydroxychloroquine among In-patients with
symptomatic Disease (ORCHID) study on June 20, 2020. After the fourth analysis that included more than 470 participants, the
[Link] 40/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
NIH data and safety monitoring board determined that, while there was no harm, the study drug was very unlikely to be
beneficial to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.[360]
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are widely used antimalarial drugs that elicit immunomodulatory effects and are therefore
also used to treat autoimmune conditions (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis). As inhibitors of heme
polymerase, they are also believed to have additional antiviral activity via alkalinization of the phagolysosome, which inhibits the
pH-dependent steps of viral replication. Wang and colleagues[361] reported that chloroquine effectively inhibits SARS-CoV-2 in
vitro. The pharmacological activity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine was tested using SARS-CoV-2–infected Vero cells.
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models (PBPK) were conducted for each drug. Hydroxychloroquine was found to be
more potent than chloroquine in vitro. Based on PBPK models, the authors recommend a loading dose of hydroxychloroquine
400 mg PO BID, followed by 200 mg BID for 4 days.[362]
Published reports stemming from the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19 have evaluated the potential usefulness of these drugs
in controlling cytokine release syndrome in critically ill patients. Owing to widely varying dosage regimens, disease severity,
measured outcomes, and lack of control groups, efficacy data have been largely inconclusive.
Opposing conclusions by French researchers regarding viral clearance and clinical benefit with the regimen of
hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin have been published.[363, 364, 365]
A small prospective study (11 consecutive hospitalized participants; mean age, 58.7 years) found no evidence of a strong
antiviral activity or clinical benefit conferred by hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin.[365]
In direct contrast to the aforementioned results, another study in France evaluated patients treated with hydroxychloroquine
(n=26) against a control group (n=16) who received standard of care. After dropping 6 patients from the analysis for having
incomplete data, the 20 remaining patients receiving hydroxychloroquine (200 mg PO q8h) had improved nasopharyngeal
clearance of the virus on day 6 (70% [14/20] vs 12.5% [2/16]).[363] This is an unusual approach to reporting results because the
clinical correlation with nasopharyngeal clearance on day 6 is unknown and several patients changed status within a few days of
that endpoint (converting from negative back to positive). The choice of that particular endpoint was also not explained by the
authors, yet 4 of the 6 excluded patients had adverse outcomes (admission to ICU or death) at that time but were not counted in
the analysis. Furthermore, patients who refused to consent to the study group were included in the control arm, indicating
unorthodox study enrollment.
Hydroxychloroquine did not improve outcomes when administered to outpatient adults (n = 423) with early COVID-19. Change
in symptom severity over 14 days did not differ between the hydroxychloroquine and placebo groups (P = 0.117). At 14 days,
24% (49 of 201) of participants receiving hydroxychloroquine had ongoing symptoms compared with 30% (59 of 194) receiving
placebo (P = 0.21). Medication adverse effects occurred in 43% (92 of 212) of participants receiving hydroxychloroquine
compared with 22% (46 of 211) receiving placebo (P< 0.001). Among patients receiving placebo, 10 were hospitalized (two
cases unrelated to COVID-19), one of whom died. Among patients receiving hydroxychloroquine, four were hospitalized and
one nonhospitalized patient died (P = 0.29).[366]
Various clinical trials in the United States were initiated to determine if hydroxychloroquine reduces the rate of infection when
used by individuals at high risk for exposure, such as high-risk healthcare workers, first responders, and individuals who share a
home with a COVID-19–positive individual.[367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372]
Results from the PATCH trial (n=125) did not show any benefit of hydroxychloroquine to reduce infection among healthcare
workers compared with placebo.[369]
Another study rerolled 1483 healthcare workers, of which 79% performed aerosol-generating procedures did not show a
difference in preventing infection with once or twice weekly hydroxychloroquine compared with placebo. The incidence of SARS-
CoV-2 laboratory-confirmed or symptomatic compatible illness was 0.27 events per person-year with once-weekly and 0.28
events per person-year with twice-weekly hydroxychloroquine compared with 0.38 events per person-year with placebo (P =
0.18 and 0.22 respectively).[373]
Results from a double-blind randomized trial (n = 821) from the University of Minnesota found no benefit of hydroxychloroquine
(n = 414) in preventing illness due to COVID-19 compared with placebo (n = 407) when used as postexposure prophylaxis in
asymptomatic participants within 4 days following high-risk or moderate-risk exposure. Overall, 87.6% of participants had high-
risk exposures without eye shields and surgical masks or respirators. New COVID-19 (either PCR-confirmed or symptomatically
compatible) developed in 107 participants (13%) during the 14-day follow-up. Incidence of new illness compatible with COVID-
19 did not differ significantly between those receiving hydroxychloroquine (49 of 414 [11.8%]) and those receiving placebo (58 of
407 [14.3%]) (P = 0.35).[374]
[Link] 41/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin each carry the warning of QT prolongation and can be associated with an
increased risk of cardiac death when used in a broader population.[375] Because of this risk, the American College of
Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society have published a thorough discussion of the
arrhythmogenicity of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin that includes a suggested protocol for clinical research QT
assessment and monitoring when the two drugs are coadministered.[376, 377]
A Brazilian study comparing chloroquine high-dose (600 mg PO BID for 10 days) and low-dose (450 mg BID for 1 day, then 450
mg/day for 4 days) observed QT prolongation in 25% of patients in the high-dose group. All patients received other drugs (ie,
azithromycin, oseltamivir) that may contribute to prolonged QT.[378]
An increased 30-day risk of cardiovascular mortality, chest pain/angina, and heart failure was observed with the addition of
azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine from an analysis of pooled data from Japan, Europe, and the United States. The analysis
compared use of hydroxychloroquine, sulfamethoxazole, or the combinations of hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin or
hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin.[379]
Doxycycline
A few case reports and small case series have speculated on a use for doxycycline in COVID-19. Most seem to have been
searching for an antibacterial to replace azithromycin for use in combination with hydroxychloroquine. In general, the use of
HCQ has been abandoned. The anti-inflammatory effects of doxycycline were also postulated to moderate the cytokine surge of
COVID-19 and provide some benefits. However, the data on corticosteroid use has returned, and is convincing and strongly
suggests their use. It is unclear that doxycycline would provide further benefits. Finally, concomitant bacterial infection during
acute COVID-19 is proving to be rare decreasing the utility of antibacterial drugs. Overall, there does not appear to be a routine
role for doxycycline.
Lopinavir/ritonavir
The NIH Panel for COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines recommend against the use of lopinavir/ritonavir or other HIV protease
inhibitors, owing to unfavorable pharmacodynamics and because clinical trials have not demonstrated a clinical benefit in
patients with COVID-19.[380]
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend against the use of lopinavir/ritonavir. The guidelines
also mention the risk for severe cutaneous reactions, QT prolongation, and the potential for drug interactions owing to CYP3A
inhibition.[28]
The RECOVERY trial concluded no beneficial effect was observed in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who were
randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 1616) compared with those who received standard care (n = 3424). No significant
difference for 28-day mortality was shown. Overall, 374 (23%) patients allocated to lopinavir/ritonavir and 767 (22%) patients
allocated to usual care died within 28 days (P = 0.60). No evidence was found for beneficial effects on the risk of progression to
mechanical ventilation or length of hospital stay.[381]
The WHO discontinued use of lopinavir/ritonavir in the SOLIDARITY trial in hospitalized patients on July 4, 2020.[145] Interim
results released mid-October 2020 found lopinavir/ritonavir (with or without interferon) appeared to have little or no effect on
hospitalized patients with COVID-19, as indicated by overall mortality, initiation of ventilation, and duration of hospital stay.
Death rate ratios were: lopinavir, 1.00 (P = 0.97; 148/1399 vs 146/1372) and lopinavir plus interferon, 1.16 (P = 0.11; 243/2050
vs 216/2050).[146]
In a randomized, controlled, open-label trial of hospitalized adults (n=199) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, recruited
patients had an oxygen saturation of 94% or less on ambient air or PaO2 of less than 300 mm Hg and were receiving a range of
ventilatory support modes (eg, no support, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]). These
patients were randomized to receive lopinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg PO BID for 14 days added to standard care (n=99) or
standard care alone (n=100). Time to clinical improvement did not differ between the two groups (median, 16 days). The
mortality rate at 28 days was numerically lower for lopinavir/ritonavir compared with standard care (19.2% vs 25%) but did not
reach statistical significance.[382] An editorial accompanies this study that is informative in regard to the extraordinary
circumstances of conducting such a study in the midst of the outbreak.[383]
Another study (n = 86) that compared lopinavir/ritonavir or umifenovir monotherapy with standard care in patients with mild-to-
moderate COVID-19 showed no statistical difference between each treatment group.[384]
A multicenter study in Hong Kong compared 14 days of triple therapy (n = 86) (lopinavir/ritonavir [400 mg/100 mg q12h],
ribavirin [400 mg q12h], interferon beta1b [8 million IU x 3 doses q48h]) with lopinavir/ritonavir alone (n = 41). Triple therapy
significantly shortened the duration of viral shedding and hospital stay in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.[385]
Average wholesale price (AWP) for a course of lopinavir/ritonavir at this dose is $575.
[Link] 42/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Ivermectin
NIH COVID-19 guidelines for ivermectin provide analysis of several randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies of
ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19. The guidelines concluded most of these studies had incomplete information and
significant methodological limitations, which make it difficult to exclude common causes of bias. Ivermectin has been shown to
inhibit SAR-COV-2 in cell cultures; however, available pharmacokinetic data from clinically relevant and excessive dosing
studies indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 inhibitory concentrations for ivermectin are not likely attainable in humans.[386]
Chaccour and colleagues raised concerns regarding ivermectin-associated neurotoxicity, particularly in patients with a
hyperinflammatory state possible with COVID-19. In addition, drug interactions with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors (eg, ritonavir)
warrant careful consideration of coadministered drugs. Finally, evidence suggests that ivermectin plasma levels with meaningful
activity against COVID-19 would not be achieved without potentially toxic increases in ivermectin doses in humans. More data
are needed to assess pulmonary tissue levels in humans.[387]
A prospective study (n = 400) of adults with mild COVID-19 were randomized 1:1 to receive ivermectin 300 mcg/kg/day for 5
days or placebo. Use of ivermectin did not show a significantly shorten duration of symptoms compared with placebo (p = 0.53).
[388]
Therapy Comment
Merimepodib
(antiviral;
BioSig Phase 2 trial in combination with remdesivir in advanced disease (NCT04410354).
Technologies)
[389]
Acalabrutinib
(Calquence; Phase 2 trial (CALAVI US) of Bruton kinase inhibitor in hospitalized patients to ameliorate excessive
AstraZeneca) inflammation (NCT04380688).
[390]
Ruxolitinib Data from the RUXCOVID study (n = 432) showed treatment with ruxolitinib plus standard-of-care did not
(Jakafi) [391] prevent complications in patients with COVID-19 associated cytokine storm.
Antiviral drug that binds to hemagglutinin protein; it is used in China and Russia to treat influenza. In a
structural and molecular dynamics study, Vankadari corroborated that the drug target for umifenovir is the
Umifenovir spike glycoproteins of SARS-CoV-2, similar to that of H3N2. A retrospective study of non-ICU
(Arbidol) [384, hospitalized patients (n = 81) with COVID-19 conducted in China did not show an improved prognosis or
392] accelerated viral clearance. Another study (n = 86) that compared lopinavir/ritonavir or umifenovir
monotherapy with standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 showed no statistical
difference between each treatment group.
UK RECOVERY trial stopped the colchicine arm upon advice from its independent data monitoring
Colchicine
committee for lack of efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
[Link] 43/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Giudicessi and colleagues[393] have published guidance for evaluating the torsadogenic potential of chloroquine,
hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and azithromycin. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine block the potassium channel,
specifically KCNH2-encoded HERG/Kv11.1. Additional modifiable risk factors (eg, treatment duration, other QT-prolonging
drugs, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia) and nonmodifiable risk factors (eg, acute coronary syndrome, renal
failure, congenital long QT syndrome, hypoglycemia, female sex, age ≥65 years) for QT prolongation may further increase the
risk. Some of the modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors may be caused by or exacerbated by severe illness.
A cohort study was performed from March 1 through April 7, 2020, to characterize the risk and degree of QT prolongation in
patients with COVID-19 who received hydroxychloroquine, with or without azithromycin. Among 90 patients given
hydroxychloroquine, 53 received concomitant azithromycin. Seven patients (19%) who received hydroxychloroquine
monotherapy developed prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds or more, and 3 patients (3%) had a change in QTc of 60
milliseconds or more. Of those who received concomitant azithromycin, 11 of 53 (21%) had prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds
or more, and 7 of 53 (13 %) had a change in QTc of 60 milliseconds or more. Clinicians should carefully monitor QTc and
concomitant medication usage if considering using hydroxychloroquine.[394]
A retrospective study reviewed 84 consecutive adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and treated with hydroxychloroquine
plus azithromycin. The QTc increased by greater than 40 ms in 30% of patients. In 11% of patients, QTc increased to more than
500 ms, which is considered a high risk for arrhythmia. The researcher noted that development of acute renal failure, but not
baseline QTc, was a strong predictor of extreme QTc prolongation.[395]
A Brazilian study (n=81) compared chloroquine high-dose (600 mg PO BID for 10 days) and low-dose (450 mg BID for 1 day,
then 450 mg/day for 4 days). A positive COVID-19 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR in 40 of 81 patients. In addition, all
patients received ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Oseltamivir was also prescribed in 89% of patients. Prolonged QT interval (>
500 msec) was observed in 25% of the high-dose group, along with a trend toward higher lethality (17%) compared with lower
dose. this prompted the investigators to prematurely halt use of the high-dose treatment arm, noting that azithromycin and
oseltamivir can also contribute to prolonged QT interval. The fatality rate was 13.5%. In 14 patients with paired samples,
respiratory secretions at day 4 showed negative results in only one patient.[378]
An increased 30-day risk of cardiovascular mortality, chest pain/angina, and heart failure was observed with the addition of
azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine. Pooled data from 14 sources of claims data or electronic medical records from Germany,
Japan, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States were analyzed for adverse effects of hydroxychloroquine,
sulfasalazine, or the combinations of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin or amoxicillin. Overall, 956,374 and 310,350 users
of hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine, respectively, and 323,122 and 351,956 users of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin and
hydroxychloroquine-amoxicillin, respectively, were included in the analysis.[379]
Investigational Devices
Blood purification devices
Several extracorporeal blood purification filters (eg, CytoSorb, oXiris, Seraph 100 Microbind, Spectra Optia Apheresis) have
received emergency use authorization from the FDA for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia in patients with
respiratory failure. The devices have various purposes, including use in continuous renal replacement therapy or in reduction of
proinflammatory cytokines levels.[396]
Nanosponges
Cellular nanosponges made from plasma membranes derived from human lung epithelial type II cells or human macrophages
have been evaluated in vitro. The nanosponges display the same protein receptors required by SARS-CoV-2 for cellular entry
and act as decoys to bind the virus. In addition, acute toxicity was evaluated in vivo in mice by intratracheal administration.[397]
Guidelines
Guidelines Summary
Numerous clinical guidelines have been issued for COVID-19. The following guidelines have been summarized at Medscape's
COVID-19 Clinical Guidelines center:
[Link] 44/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
COVID-19 Enforcement Policy for Sterilizers, Disinfectant Devices, and Air Purifiers (FDA, 2020): 2020 COVID-19
guidance for industry and FDA staff
OSHA Guidance on Preparing the Workplace for COVID-19 (2020): 2020 guidance on preparing the workplace for
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
COVID-19 Breast Cancer Patient Triage Guidelines (CPBCC): Guidelines on surgical triage of patients with breast
cancer by the COVID 19 Pandemic Breast Cancer Consortium
Procedures in Known/Suspected COVID-19 (ASA, 2020): 2020 guidelines on performing procedures on patients with
known or suspected COVID-19 by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
COVID-19–Related Airway Management Clinical Practice Guidelines (SIAARTI/EAMS, 2020): 2020 clinical practice
guidelines from the SIAARTI Airway Research Group and the European Airway Management Society on coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related airway management.
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19): Panel consisting of 36 experts from 12 countries compiled 54 evidence-based statements for clinicians
caring for patients with severe COVID-19 infection
Belgium Task Force on Supportive Care and Antiviral/Immunologic Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Suspected or
Confirmed COVID-19 (2020): 2020 interim clinical guidance by the Belgium Task Force for supportive care and
antiviral/immunologic therapy for adults with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
COVID-19 Ventilation Clinical Practice Guidelines (2020): COVID-19 ventilation clinical practice guidelines by the
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine
Guidance on Obstetric COVID-19 (ISUOG, 2020): Guidance on the management of COVID-19 infection during
pregnancy, childbirth, and the neonatal period, from the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Control of COVID-19 in Nursing Homes Guidelines (2020): 2020 guidelines on infection control and prevention of
COVID-19 in nursing homes by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
FDA Face Mask and Respirator Policy in COVID-19 (2020): 2020 guidelines on enforcement policy for face masks and
respirators by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Rapid COVID-19 Clinical Practice Guidelines (2020): Rapid COVID-19 clinical practice guidelines by Wuhan University
Novel Coronavirus Management & Research Team and China International Exchange & Promotive Association for
Medical and Health Care.
Guidance on Cardiac Implications of COVID-19 (ACC, 2020): 2020 guidance by the American College of Cardiology
regarding the cardiac implications of COVID-19
COVID-19 Guidance for Ophthalmologists (AAO, 2020): 2020 COVID-19 guidance for urgent and nonurgent patient care
in ophthalmology.
Guidance on Containing Spread of COVID-19 (CMS, 2020): Guidance for hospitals on how to identify at-risk patients,
screen for COVID-19, and monitor or restrict health care facility staff, from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
COVID-19 Sample Collection and Testing: Clinical Practice Guidelines (CDC, 2020): 2020 clinical practice guidelines
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the collection, handling, and testing of specimens for the
diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Guidelines for Evaluating and Testing Persons Under Investigation for COVID-19 (CDC, 2020): 2020 clinical practice
guidelines on evaluating and testing persons under investigation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Caring for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2020 clinical practice
guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Provides discussion and resources for parents and caregivers of
children with special needs regarding how to minimize infection risk, support from health and related service providers,
and school decisions.
Information regarding COVID-19 is rapidly emerging and evolving. For the latest information, see the following:
Clinical trials
Public health information
Research information
CDC Evaluating and Testing Persons Under Investigation (PUI) for COVID-19
Clinical Guidelines
The CDC has issued interim guidance for the COVID-19 outbreak, including evaluation and testing of persons under
investigation (PUIs) for COVID-19.[398]
Criteria to guide evaluation and testing of patients under investigation for COVID-19
Clinicians should work with state and local health departments to coordinate testing. The FDA has authorized COVID-19
diagnostic testing to be made available in clinical laboratories, expanding the capacity for clinicians to consider testing
symptomatic patients.
[Link] 45/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The decision to administer COVID-19 testing should be based on clinical judgment, along with the presence of compatible signs
and symptoms. The CDC now recommends that COVID-19 be considered a possibility in patients with severe respiratory illness
regardless of travel history or exposure to individuals with confirmed infection. The most common symptoms in patients with
confirmed COVID-19 have included fever and/or symptoms of acute respiratory illness, including breathing difficulties and
cough.
Patient groups in whom COVID-19 testing may be prioritized include the following:
1. Hospitalized patients with compatible signs and symptoms in the interest of infection control
2. High-risk symptomatic patients (eg, older patients and patients with underlying conditions that place them at higher
likelihood of a poor outcome)
3. Symptomatic patients who have had close contact with an individual with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 or who have
traveled from affected geographic areas within 14 days of symptom onset
Clinicians should also consider epidemiologic factors when deciding whether to test for COVID-19. Other causes of respiratory
illness (eg, influenza) should be ruled out.
Patients with mild illness who are otherwise healthy should stay home and coordinate clinical management with their healthcare
provider over the phone. Patients with severe symptoms (eg, breathing difficulty) should seek immediate care. High-risk patients
(older individuals and immunocompromised patients or those with underlying medical conditions) should be encouraged to
contact their healthcare provider in the case of any illness, even if mild.[398]
In the event that a patient is classified a PUI for COVID-19, infection-control personnel at the healthcare facility should
immediately be notified. Upon identification of a PUI, state health departments should immediately complete a PUI and Case
Report form and can contact CDC’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) at 770-488-7100 for assistance.
Currently, diagnostic testing for COVID-19 is being performed at state public health laboratories and the CDC. Testing for other
respiratory pathogens should not delay specimen testing for COVID-19.
The CDC recommends collecting and testing upper respiratory specimens (oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs) and
lower respiratory specimens (sputum, if possible) in patients with a productive cough for initial diagnostic testing. Sputum
induction is not indicated. If clinically indicated, a lower respiratory tract aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage sample should be
collected and tested. Once a PUI is identified, specimens should be collected as soon as possible.[398]
Collection and evaluation of an upper respiratory nasopharyngeal swab (NP) is recommended for initial COVID-19 testing.
If an oropharyngeal swab (OP) is collected, it should be combined in the same tube as the NP; however, OPs are a lower
priority than NPs.
Only patients with a productive cough should undergo sputum collection. Sputum induction is not recommended.
If lower respiratory tract specimens are available, they should also be tested.
If clinically indicated (eg, if the patient is undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation), collection and testing of a lower respiratory
tract aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage sample should be performed.
Once a possible COVID-19 case has been identified, specimen collection should be performed as soon as possible, regardless
of when the individual’s symptoms began.
Two to 3 mL should be collected in a sterile, leak-proof, screw-cap sputum collection cup or sterile, dry container.
Sputum
[Link] 46/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The patient should rinse his or her mouth with water and then expectorate deep cough sputum directly into a sterile, leak-proof,
screw-cap sputum collection cup or sterile, dry container.
Only synthetic fiber swabs with plastic shafts should be used. Calcium alginate swabs or swabs with wooden shafts—both of
which may contain substances that inactivate some viruses and inhibit PCR testing—should not be used. Swabs should be
placed immediately in sterile tubes containing 2-3 mL of viral transport media. In general, the CDC recommends that only an NP
should be collected. If an OP is collected as well, it should be combined at collection with the NP in a single vial.
To collect an NP, the swab should be inserted into the nostril parallel to the palate, reaching a depth equal to the distance from
the nostrils to the ear’s outer opening. To absorb secretions, the swab should be left in place for several seconds. It should then
be slowly removed while the clinician rotates it.
In collecting an OP (eg, a throat swab), the posterior pharynx should be swabbed, with avoidance of the tongue.
Two to 3 mL should be collected in a sterile, leak-proof, screw-cap sputum collection cup or sterile, dry container.
Storage
Specimens should be stored at 2-8°C for up to 72 hours after collection. If testing or shipping may be delayed, the specimens
should be stored at -70°C or below.
Shipping
Packaging, shipping, and transportation of specimens must be performed as designated in the current edition of the
International Air Transport Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations. Specimens should be stored at 2-8°C and
shipped overnight to the CDC on ice pack. Specimens frozen at -70°C should be shipped overnight to the CDC on dry ice.
Hospitals should monitor the CDC website ([Link] for up-to-date information
and resources.
Hospitals should contact their local health department if they have questions or suspect a patient or healthcare provider (HCP)
has COVID-19.
Hospitals should have plans for monitoring healthcare personnel with exposure to patients with known or suspected COVID-19.
Additional information about monitoring healthcare personnel is available at [Link]
ncov/hcp/[Link].
Older adults and those with underlying chronic medical conditions or immunocompromised state may be at highest risk for
severe outcomes. This should be considered in the decision to monitor the patient as an outpatient or inpatient.
Hospitals should identify visitors and patients at risk for having COVID-19 infection before or immediately upon arrival to the
healthcare facility. They should ask patients about the following:
For patients identified as at-risk, implement respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette (ie, placing a face mask over the patient’s
nose and mouth) and isolate the patient in an examination room with the door closed.
[Link] 47/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
If the patient cannot be immediately moved to an examination room, ensure they are not allowed to wait among other patients
seeking care. Identify a separate, well-ventilated space that allows waiting patients to be separated by 6 or more feet, with easy
access to respiratory hygiene supplies. In some settings, medically stable patients might opt to wait in a personal vehicle or
outside the healthcare facility where they can be contacted by mobile phone when they can be evaluated.
Inform infection prevention and control services, local and state public health authorities, and other healthcare facility staff as
appropriate about the presence of a person under investigation for COVID-19.
Additional guidance for evaluating patients in the United States for COVID-19 can be found on the CDC COVID-19 Web site.
Provide supplies for respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette, including 60%-95% alcohol-based hand sanitizer (ABHS), tissues,
no-touch receptacles for disposal, facemasks, and tissues at healthcare facility entrances, waiting rooms, patient check-ins, etc.
The same screening performed for visitors should be performed for hospital staff.
HCP who have signs and symptoms of a respiratory infection should not report to work.
Any staff that develop signs and symptoms of a respiratory infection while on the job should do the following:
Refer to the CDC guidance for exposures that might warrant restricting asymptomatic health care personnel from reporting to
work ([Link]
Hospitals should contact their local health department for questions and frequently review the CDC website dedicated to
COVID-19 for health care professionals: [Link]
Patient placement and infection prevention and control for known or suspected COVID-19 cases
Patient placement and other detailed infection prevention and control recommendations regarding hand hygiene, transmission-
based precautions, environmental cleaning and disinfection, managing visitors, and monitoring and managing health care
personnel are available in the CDC Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Confirmed
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) or Persons under Investigation for COVID-19 in Healthcare Settings.
Patients may not require hospitalization and can be managed at home if they are able to comply with monitoring requests. More
information is available at [Link]
Patients with known or suspected COVID-19 should continue to receive the intervention appropriate for the severity of their
illness and overall clinical condition. Because some procedures create high risks for transmission (eg, intubation), additional
precautions include the following:
The decision to discontinue transmission-based precautions for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 should be made on a case-
by-case basis in consultation with clinicians, infection prevention and control specialists, and public health officials. This decision
should consider disease severity, illness signs and symptoms, and results of laboratory testing for COVID-19 in respiratory
specimens.
More detailed information about criteria to discontinue transmission-based precautions are available at
[Link]
Visitation rights
Medicare regulations require a hospital to have written policies and procedures regarding the visitation rights of patients,
including those setting forth any clinically necessary or reasonable restriction or limitation that the hospital may need to place on
such rights and the reasons for the clinical restriction or limitation, such as infection control concerns.
Patients must be informed of their visitation rights and the clinical restrictions or limitations on visitation.
[Link] 48/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
The development of such policies and procedures require hospitals to focus efforts on preventing and controlling infections, not
just between patients and personnel, but also between individuals across the entire hospital setting (for example, among
patients, staff, and visitors), as well as between the hospital and other healthcare institutions and settings and between patients
and the healthcare environment.
Hospitals should work with their local, state, and federal public health agencies to develop appropriate preparedness and
response strategies for communicable threats.
Hospital discharge
The decision to discharge a patient from the hospital should be based on the clinical condition of the patient. If transmission-
based precautions must be continued in the subsequent setting, the receiving facility must be able to implement all
recommended infection prevention and control measures.
Although patients COVID-19 who have mild symptoms may be managed at home, the decision to discharge to home should
take into account the patient’s ability to adhere to isolation recommendations, as well as the potential risk of secondary
transmission to household members with immunocompromising conditions. More information is available at
[Link]
Medicare’s Discharge Planning Regulations (updated in November 2019) require that the hospital assess the patient’s needs for
post-hospital services and the availability of such services. When a patient is discharged, all necessary medical information
(including communicable diseases) must be provided to any post-acute service provider. For patients with COVID-19, this must
be communicated to the receiving service provider prior to discharge/transfer and to the healthcare transport personnel.
Early evidence has shown low rates of peripartum SARS-CoV-2 transmission and uncertainty concerning in utero viral
transmission.
Neonates can be infected by SARS-CoV-2 after birth. Because of their immature immune systems, they are vulnerable to
serious respiratory viral infections. SARS-CoV-2 may be able to cause severe disease in neonates.
A gown and gloves should be worn by birth attendants, along with an N95 respiratory mask plus goggles or an air-purifying
respirator that protects the eyes.
Transplacental viral transmission from mother to newborn has not been clearly demonstrated, so delayed cord clamping can
continue per normal center practices. The mother can briefly hold the newborn during delayed cord clamping if infection-control
precautions are observed.
This is a controversial. Some information has shown good outcomes among most newborns exposed to mothers with COVID-
19, although some infants have developed severe illness. The safest approach is to minimize the infection risk via separation, at
least temporarily, allowing time for the mother to become less infectious. If the mother chooses against separation or other
factors preclude separation, infection risks should be minimized with distancing (at least 6 feet between mother and newborn)
and provision of hands-on care to the infant by a noninfected caregiver. Mothers who provide hands-on care should wear a
facemask and observe proper hand hygiene.
Breastfeeding
Breastfeeding is strongly supported as the best choice for infant feeding. Breastmilk is unlikely to transmit SARS-CoV-2.
Mothers with COVID-19 may express breast milk after appropriate hand and breast hygiene to be fed to the newborn by
caregivers without COVID-19. Mothers who opt for nursing should observe strict precautions, including use of a facemask and
breast and hand hygiene.
[Link] 49/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Neonatal intensive care
If the newborn requires intensive care and respiratory support, admission to a single-patient room with negative room pressure
is optimal. If multiple newborns with exposure to COVID-19 must be treated in the same room, they should be kept at least six
feet apart and/or kept in temperature-controlled isolettes.
Care providers should wear gowns and gloves, along with an N95 respiratory mask plus goggles or an air-purifying respirator
that protects the eyes to treat infants who require supplemental oxygen at more than 2 LPM, continuous positive airway
pressure, or mechanical ventilation.
Following birth, newborns born to mothers with COVID-19 should be bathed to remove virus from the skin. Newborns should
undergo testing for SARS-CoV-2 at 24 hours and 48 hours (if still at the birth facility) after birth. Centers with limited testing
resources can make testing decisions on a case-by-case basis.
Newborn discharge
Newborns born to mothers with COVID-19 should be discharged per the hospital’s normal criteria. Early discharge is not
necessary.
Newborns who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 but are asymptomatic should undergo frequent outpatient follow-up (via phone,
telemedicine, or office visit) through 14 days after birth. Infection-control precautions should be observed at home and in the
outpatient office.
Infants who test negative for SARS-CoV-2 are likely to be discharged to the care of individuals who have COVID-19 or who
have been exposed to COVID-19. All potential caregivers should receive infection-prevention instructions. Following hospital
discharge, mothers with COVID-19 should stay at least 6 feet away from their newborns. If a closer proximity is required, the
mother should wear a mask and observe hand hygiene for newborn care until (1) her temperature has normalized for 72 hours
without antipyretic therapy and (2) at least 10 days has passed since the onset of symptoms. If the mother has asymptomatic
SARS-CoV-2 infection (identified with obstetric screening tests), she should wait at least 10 days from the positive test or until
two consecutive tests administered more than 24 hours apart show negative results.
Newborns who cannot undergo SARS-CoV-2 testing should be treated as infected for an observation period of 14 days. The
mother should still observe the precautions detailed above.
NICU visitation
Access to NICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic is limited. Mothers and partners with confirmed or suspected COVID-19
(PUIs) should not enter the NICU until their status is resolved and transmission is no longer a risk.
Hospitalized and requires supplemental oxygen (but not by high-flow device, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical
ventilation, or ECMO)
Remdesivir 200 mg IV x 1, then 100 mg IV qDay for 4 days or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first, OR
Remdesivir plus dexamethasone 6 mg IV/PO qDay for up to 10 days or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first
If remdesivir cannot be used, dexamethasone may be used instead
[Link] 50/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Dexamethasone at doses and duration above OR
Dexamethasone plus remdesivir for patient recently intubated
Antiviral therapy
Remdesivir
Because remdesivir supplies are limited, the Panel recommends prioritizing remdesivir for use in hospitalized patients with
COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen, but who do not require oxygen delivery by high-flow device, noninvasive
ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
Five days of remdesivir treatment is recommended in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who are not intubated. The
optimal duration of remdesivir treatment is undetermined in mechanically ventilated patients, patients on ECMO, and patients in
whom improvement is inadequate after 5 days of therapy.
The data are insufficient to recommend for or against remdesivir in patients with mild or moderate COVID-19.
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine
The Panel recommends against chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19
outside the context of a clinical trial.
The Panel recommends against the use of high-dose chloroquine (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) for the treatment of COVID-
19.
Other antivirals
The Panel recommends against (1) hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, (2) lopinavir/ritonavir, and (3) other HIV protease
inhibitors except in a clinical trial.
Tocilizumab
The Panel recommends use of tocilizumab (single IV dose of 8 mg/kg, up to 800 mg) in combination with dexamethasone in
recently hospitalized patients who are exhibiting rapid respiratory decompensation caused by COVID-19. These patients
include:
Recently hospitalized patients who have been admitted to the ICU within the prior 24 hours and who require invasive
mechanical ventilation, noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), or high-flow nasal canula (HFNC) oxygen (>0.4
FiO2/30 L/min of oxygen flow) (BIIa); or
Recently hospitalized patients (not in the ICU) with rapidly increasing oxygen needs who require NIV or HFNC and have
significantly increased markers of inflammation (BIIa) (eg, C-reactive protein 75 mg/L or greater)
Corticosteroids
The Panel recommends dexamethasone (6 mg/day for up to 10 days) in patients with COVID-19 who are mechanically
ventilated and in patients who require supplemental oxygen but are not mechanically ventilated.
The Panel recommends against dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen.
If dexamethasone is not available, the Panel recommends using alternative glucocorticoids such as prednisone,
methylprednisolone, or hydrocortisone.
Convalescent plasma
The FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) on August 23, 2020 for use of convalescent plasma in hospitalized
patients with COVID-19.[23] Convalescent plasma contains antibody-rich plasma products collected from eligible donors who
have recovered from COVID-19.
The NIH COVID-19 Guidelines Panel further evaluated the Mayo Clinic’s expanded access (EA) program data and further
reviewed subgroups. Among patients who were not intubated, 11% of those who received convalescent plasma with high
antibody titers died within 7 days of transfusion compared with 14% of those who received convalescent plasma with low
antibody titers. Among those who were intubated, there was no difference in 7-day survival.
There are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of
COVID-19.
[Link] 51/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Adverse effects of COVID-19 convalescent plasma are infrequent and consistent with the risks associated with plasma
infusions for other indications.
Convalescent plasma should not be considered standard of care for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.
Prospective, well-controlled, adequately powered, randomized trials are needed.
The NIH halted its trial of convalescent plasma in emergency departments for treatment of patients with mild symptoms as of
March 2021. The second planned interim analysis of the trial data determined that while the convalescent plasma intervention
caused no harm, it was unlikely to benefit this group of patients.
Antivirals
Remdesivir
Remdesivir is approved the FDA for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years
and older who weigh at least 40 kg.
Emergency use authorization (EUA) has also been issued for use in hospitalized children aged 12 years or younger
weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg.
Consideration in contingency or crisis capacity settings (ie, limited remdesivir supply): Remdesivir appears to
demonstrate the most benefit in those with severe COVID-19 on supplemental oxygen rather than in patients on
mechanical ventilation or ECMO.
Ivermectin
Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without azithromycin: In patients with COVID-19, the panel recommends
against hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine. Strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence.
Lopinavir/ritonavir and other HIV protease inhibitors
Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine plus azithromycin: In patients with COVID-19, the panel suggests against
hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine plus azithromycin. Strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence.
Combination of lopinavir/ritonavir: In hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, the panel recommends against the
combination of lopinavir/ritonavir. Strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence.
Corticosteroids
Hospitalized critically ill patients: The panel recommends glucocorticoids over no glucocorticoids (dexamethasone 6 mg
IV or PO for 10 days, or until discharge). Strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence.
Hospitalized patients with severe, but noncritical COVID-19: The panel suggests corticosteroids rather than no
corticosteroids. Conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence.
Hospitalized patients with nonsevere COVID-19: The Panel suggests against use of glucocorticoids. Conditional
recommendation, low certainty of evidence.
[Link] 52/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Immunomodulators
Baricitinib
Among hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 who cannot receive corticosteroids because of a contraindication, the
IDSA guideline panel suggests use of baricitinib with remdesivir rather than remdesivir alone.
The FDA issued and EUA for baricitinib for use in combination with remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized
patients aged 2 years and older who require supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or ECMO.
Tocilizumab: In hospitalized adults with COVID-19 who have elevated markers of systemic inflammation, the panel
suggests tocilizumab in addition to standard of care (ie, steroids) rather than standard of care alone. Conditional
recommendation, low certainty of evidence.
Sarilumab: Preliminary data (preprint) from a trial with 45 patients receiving sarilumab; data are limited to offer
recommendation.
Convalescent plasma: The FDA issued an EUA for use in hospitalized patients.
Monoclonal directed antibodies: The FDA issued EUAs for bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab plus etesevimab, and
casirivimab plus imdevimab for nonhospitalized patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease who are at high risk of
disease progression.
Famotidine
In hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, the panel suggests against famotidine for the sole intent of COVID-19
treatment outside the context of a clinical trial
Conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence.
In the absence of contraindications, all acutely hospitalized patients with COVID-19 should receive thromboprophylaxis
therapy.
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux should be used for thromboprophylaxis over unfractionated
heparin and direct oral anticoagulants.
Data are insufficient to justify routine increased-intensity anticoagulant dosing in hospitalized or critically ill patients with
COVID-19.
Recommend only inpatient thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19.
In critically ill patients with COVID-19, suggest against routine ultrasonographic screening for asymptomatic deep vein
thrombosis (DVT).
In critically ill patients with COVID-19 who have proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism, recommend parenteral
anticoagulation therapy with therapeutic weight-adjusted LMWH or fondaparinux over unfractionated heparin.
In hospitalized patients, measure D-dimers, prothrombin time, and platelet count (and possibly fibrinogen).
The guidelines include an algorithm for management of coagulopathy based on laboratory markers.
Monitoring for septic coagulopathy can be helpful in determining prognosis in patients with COVID‐19 requiring hospital
admission.
Use of LMWH to protect critically ill patients against venous thromboembolism appears to improve prognosis.
[Link] 53/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Guideline summary is as follows[406] :
Measure hematologic and coagulation parameters (eg, D-dimers, PT, platelet count, fibrinogen) in hospitalized patients.
Patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies for underlying conditions should continue these medications if they
receive a diagnosis of COVID-19.
Hospitalized adults with COVID-19 should receive VTE prophylaxis per the standard of care for other hospitalized adults.
Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 should not routinely be discharged on VTE prophylaxis.
In hospitalized patients, the possibility of thromboembolic disease should be evaluated in the event of rapid deterioration
of pulmonary, cardiac, or neurological function or of sudden localized loss of peripheral perfusion.
Medication
Medication Summary
Remdesivir was the first drug approved by the FDA for treating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is indicated for treatment of COVID-19
disease in hospitalized adults and children aged 12 years and older who weigh at least 40 kg.[21] The broad-spectrum antiviral
is a nucleotide analog prodrug. Full approval was preceded by the US FDA issued an EUA (emergency use authorization) on
May 1, 2020 to allow prescribing of remdesivir for severe COVID-19 (confirmed or suspected) in hospitalized adults and children
prior to approval.[159] Upon approval of remdesivir in adults and adolescents, the EUA was updated to maintain the ability for
prescribers to treat pediatric patients weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg or children younger than 12 years who weigh at least
3.5 kg.[22]
Investigational treatments include other antiviral agents, vaccines, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, convalescent
plasma, and antithrombotics. Several of the above therapies and vaccines have been granted emergency use authorization by
the FDA.
Vaccines
Class Summary
The FDA has granted emergency use authorization for the vaccines listed below.
[Link] 54/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Monoclonal Antibodies
Class Summary
Recombinant neutralizing human IgG1-kappa monoclonal antibodies (mAb) exert their effect by binding to various sites on the
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. All are indicated for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease in adults and adolescents who are at high
risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization.
Casirivimab/imdevimab
FDA granted EUA November 21, 2020. Casirivimab and imdevimab IV solution are each supplied in individual single-dose vials
and are admixed in the same IV bag.
Bamlanivimab
FDA granted EUA November 9, 2020. Bamlanivimab can be used alone or together with etesevimab.
Etesevimab
FDA granted EUA February 9, 2021. Etesevimab can only be used with bamlanivimab by admixing each dose within the same
IV bag. Etesevimab and bamlanivimab bind to different but overlapping epitopes in the receptor-binding domain of the S-protein;
using both antibodies together is expected to reduce the risk of viral resistance. In clinical trials, bamlanivimab and etesevimab
administered together resulted in fewer treatment-emergent variants relative to bamlanivimab administered alone.
Corticosteroids
Class Summary
NIH guidelines for COVID-19 recommends use of dexamethasone to reduce mortality in hospitalized patients who are
mechanically ventilated or those requiring supplemental oxygen without mechanical ventilation.[403] These recommendations
are based on results of the RECOVERY trial.[212]
Dexamethasone
Decreases inflammation by suppressing migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and reducing capillary permeability;
stabilizes cell and lysosomal membranes.
Prednisone (Deltasone)
Consider use if dexamethasone is unavailable. Available as oral formulation.
Hydrocortisone
Consider use if dexamethasone is unavailable. Available as oral or IV formulations.
[Link] 55/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Antiviral Agents
Class Summary
Remdesivir is the first drug approved by the FDA for COVID-19.
Remdesivir (Veklury)
Adenosine nucleotide prodrug that distributes into cells, where it is metabolized to form the pharmacologically active nucleoside
triphosphate metabolite. Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is essential for viral replication.
It is indicated. It is indicated for treatment of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized adults and children aged 12 years and older who
weigh at least 40 kg. An EUA is approved for pediatric patients weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg or children younger than 12
years who weigh at least 3.5 kg.
What is coronavirus?
What is COVID-19?
What are the signs and symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the CDC risk assessment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the US?
Which precautions should high-risk persons take to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Are surgical facemasks more effective than N95 masks in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the duration of viral shedding in persons with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States?
[Link] 56/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
How does coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affect pregnant women and neonates?
What are the characteristics of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) due to coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19)?
Is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) more severe than SARS and MERS?
Which age groups are most likely to die of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
How does diabetes affect mortality risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Have any mutations been discovered for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Presentation
What are important history details when evaluating a patient for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What were the most common presentations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China?
What is the most common serious symptom of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
How should a patient under investigation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) be evaluated in healthcare settings?
Workup
Where are diagnostic tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) processed?
Should coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) testing be repeated if PCR results are negative?
How is molecular testing used in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are common lab features in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What type of test is used to evaluate for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the significance of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result after clinical resolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which clinical specimen samples are best for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing?
Are there any signs of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in seemingly asymptomatic patients?
What is the role of CT scanning in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of chest radiography in the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
[Link] 57/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Treatment
Are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) safe in persons with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Are any drugs available for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) postexposure prophylaxis?
What is the roles of the antiparasitic drug niclosamide in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of the antiviral drug remdesivir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of nitazoxanide in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019)?
What is the role of molnupiravir and favipiravir in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of convalescent plasma in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of interleukin (IL) inhibitors in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the roles of the IL-6 inhibitors tocilizumab (Actemra) and sarilumab (Kevzara) in the treatment of coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of corticosteroids (such as dexamethasone) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of nitric oxide in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of interleukin-7 inhibitors and the interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1) inhibitor anakinra (Kineret) and canakinumab
(Ilaris) in the treatment of coronavirus diseaes 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of JAK and NAK inhibitors in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019)?
What is the role of statins in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019)?
What other drugs are being investigated to treat ARDS/cytokine release associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which immunotherapies are being investigated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which antibody-directed therapies are being investigated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which vaccines are being investigated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention?
What is the role of losartan in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019)?
What are considerations for using ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and ARBs in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the role of the antivirals lopinavir/ritonavir and ivermectin in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the roles of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which drugs being studied for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are associated with QT prolongation and
an increased risk of cardiac death?
What is the role of blood purification devices in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What is the role of nanosponges in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Guidelines
[Link] 58/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
What guidelines are available for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the CDC criteria to guide evaluation and testing of patients under investigation for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19)?
What are the CDC's sample collection and testing guidelines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the guidelines for containing hospital spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the AAP guidelines for management of infants born to mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the thromboembolism prevention and treatment guidelines in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
What are the CDC guidelines for reporting, testing, and specimen collection for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Medications
Which medications in the drug class Vaccines are used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which medications in the drug class Monoclonal Antibodies are used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
19)?
Which medications in the drug class Corticosteroids are used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Which medications in the drug class Antiviral Agents are used in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Author
David J Cennimo, MD, FAAP, FACP, AAHIVS Assistant Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics, Adult and Pediatric Infectious
Diseases, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
David J Cennimo, MD, FAAP, FACP, AAHIVS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of HIV
Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, HIV Medicine
Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Medical Society of New Jersey, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Coauthor(s)
Scott J Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Coordinator, Infectious Diseases
Pharmacy Residency Program Director, Department of Pharmaceutical and Nutrition Care, Division of Infectious Diseases,
Nebraska Medicine; Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of
Nebraska Medical Center
Scott J Bergman, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, BCPS, BCIDP is a member of the following medical societies: American Association
of Colleges of Pharmacy, American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Pharmacists Association, American Society for
Microbiology, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society of Infectious
Diseases Pharmacists
Keith M Olsen, PharmD, FCCP, FCCM Dean and Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-
Chief, Medscape Drug Reference
Chief Editor
[Link] 59/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
Michael Stuart Bronze, MD David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed
Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American
College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America; Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, London
Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of
Physicians, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Society of America,
Oklahoma State Medical Association, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation
Additional Contributors
Molly Marie Miller, PharmD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American
Pharmacists Association, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Nebraska Pharmacists Association, Society of
Infectious Diseases Pharmacists
References
2. Gallegos A. WHO Declares Public Health Emergency for Novel Coronavirus. Medscape Medical News. Available at
[Link] January 30, 2020; Accessed: January 31, 2020.
3. Ramzy A, McNeil DG. W.H.O. Declares Global Emergency as Wuhan Coronavirus Spreads. The New York Times. Available at
[Link] January 30, 2020; Accessed: January 30, 2020.
4. The New York Times. Coronavirus Live Updates: W.H.O. Declares Pandemic as Number of Infected Countries Grows. The New York
Times. Available at [Link] March 11, 2020; Accessed:
March 11, 2020.
5. Coronavirus Updates: The Illness Now Has a Name: COVID-19. The New York Times. Available at
[Link] February 11, 2020; Accessed: February 11, 2020.
6. WHO Director-General's remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020. Available at
[Link]
February 11, 2020; Accessed: February 13, 2020.
7. Gorbalenya AE. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus – The species and its viruses, a statement of the
Coronavirus Study Group. Available at [Link] February 11, 2020; Accessed: February 13, 2020.
8. CDC COVID-19 Response Team, Jorden MA, Rudman SL, et al. Evidence for Limited Early Spread of COVID-19 Within the United
States, January-February 2020. MMWR. Available at [Link]
research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments. May 29, 2020; Accessed: June 1, 2020.
9. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Recommendations for Cloth Face Covers. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. Available at [Link] April 3, 2020;
Accessed: April 6, 2020.
10. Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, et al. Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to
reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Available at
[Link]
[Link]. 2020 Mar 16; Accessed: March 18, 2020.
11. Honein MA, Christie A, Rose DA, et al. Summary of guidance for public health strategies to address high levels of community
transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and related deaths, December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 04. [Full Text].
12. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): People with Certain Medical Conditions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Available at [Link] 2020 Dec 01;
Accessed: December 8, 2020.
13. CDC. 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Wuhan, China: Symptoms. CDC. Available at [Link]
ncov/about/[Link]. January 26, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
14. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, Jones FK, Zheng Q, Meredith HR, et al. The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-
19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Mar 10. [Medline].
[Link] 60/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
15. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in
China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Feb 24.
[Medline].
17. Rabin RC. Lost Sense of Smell May Be Peculiar Clue to Coronavirus Infection. The New York Times. Available at
[Link] March 22, 2020; Accessed: March 24, 2020.
18. Spinato G, Fabbris C, Polesel J, Cazzador D, Borsetto D, Hopkins C, et al. Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic
Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA. 2020 Apr 22. [Medline].
19. CDC. 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Wuhan, China: Interim Healthcare Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients
Under Investigation for 2019 Novel Coronavirus. CDC. Available at [Link]
[Link]. January 18, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
20. Rizk JG, Forthal DN, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Mehra MR, Lavie CJ, Rizk Y, et al. Expanded Access Programs, compassionate drug use,
and Emergency Use Authorizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug Discov Today. 2020 Nov 27. [Medline]. [Full Text].
21. FDA. FDA Approves First Treatment for COVID-19. [Link]. 2020 Oct 22. Available at [Link]
announcements/fda-approves-first-treatment-covid-19.
22. FDA. Fact sheet for healthcare providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of Veklury (remdesivir) for hospitalized pediatric
patients weighing 3.5 kg to less than 40 kg or hospitalized pediatric patients less than 12 years of age weight at least 3.5 kg. [Link].
Available at [Link] October, 2020 (revised); Accessed: October 22, 2020.
23. FDA News Release. FDA Reissues Emergency Use Authorization for Convalescent Plasma. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Available at [Link] 2020 Nov 30; Accessed: December 8, 2020.
24. FDA. Fact sheet for health care providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of casirivimab and imdevimab. United States Food
and Drug Administration. Available at [Link] 2020 Nov 21; Accessed: November 21, 2020.
25. FDA. Fact sheet for healthcare providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of baricitinib. [Link]. Available at
[Link] November 2020; Accessed: November 19, 2020.
26. CDC. 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Wuhan, China: Prevention & Treatment. CDC. Available at [Link]
ncov/about/[Link]. January 26, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
27. McCreary EK, Pogue JM. COVID-19 Treatment: A Review of Early and Emerging Options. Open Forum Infectious Diseases (OFID).
2020 Mar 23. [Full Text].
28. [Guideline] Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and
Management of Patients with COVID-19. IDSA. Available at [Link]
treatment-and-management/. 2021 Mar 05; Accessed: March 12, 2021.
29. Sanders JM, Monogue ML, Jodlowski TZ, Cutrell JB. Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A
Review. JAMA. 2020 Apr 13. [Medline]. [Full Text].
30. Barlow A, Landolf KM, Barlow B, Yeung SYA, Heavner JJ, Claassen CW, et al. Review of Emerging Pharmacotherapy for the
Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Apr 7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
31. Jomah S, Asdaq SMB, Al-Yamani MJ. Clinical efficacy of antivirals against novel coronavirus (COVID-19): A review. J Infect Public
Health. 2020 Aug 3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
32. Abutaleb Y. How the new coronavirus differs from SARS, measles and Ebola. The Washington Post. Available at
[Link]
11ea-b90d-5652806c3b3a_story.html. January 23, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
33. Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, Ntoumi F, Kock R, Dar O, et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to
global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 14. 91:264-266. [Medline].
34. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019: Scientific Brief: SARS-CoV-2 and Potential Airborne Transmission. Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at [Link]
ncov/more/[Link]. 2020 Oct 05; Accessed: October 9, 2020.
35. Morawska L, Milton DK. It is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 6. [Medline].
36. World Health Organization. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions. World Health
Organization. Available at [Link]
prevention-precautions. July 9, 2020; Accessed: July 13, 2020.
[Link] 61/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
37. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-
CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 17. [Medline].
38. Chin AWH, Chu JTS, Perera MRA, et al. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. The Lancet Microbe. April 2,
2020. [Full Text].
39. Johansson MA, Quandelacy TM, Kada S, Prasad PV, Steele M, Brooks JT, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without
COVID-19 Symptoms. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4. 4 (1):e2035057. [Medline]. [Full Text].
40. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in
Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020 Mar 11. [Medline].
41. Liu Y, Yan LM, Wan L, Xiang TX, Le A, Liu JM, et al. Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020
Mar 19. [Medline].
42. Zhou B, She J, Wang Y, Ma X. The duration of viral shedding of discharged patients with severe COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr
17. [Medline].
43. Mole B. Recovered COVID-19 patients test positive but not infectious, data finds. Ars Technica. Available at
[Link] May 19, 2020; Accessed:
June 1, 2020.
44. Aydillo T, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Aslam S, van de Guchte A, Khan Z, Obla A, et al. Shedding of Viable SARS-CoV-2 after
Immunosuppressive Therapy for Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24. 383 (26):2586-2588. [Medline]. [Full Text].
45. Baang JH, Smith C, Mirabelli C, Valesano AL, Manthei DM, Bachman M, et al. Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 replication in an
immunocompromised patient. J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 22. [Medline]. [Full Text].
46. Li D, Jin M, Bao P, Zhao W, Zhang S. Clinical Characteristics and Results of Semen Tests Among Men With Coronavirus Disease
2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1. 3 (5):e208292. [Medline].
47. Oran DP, Topol EJ. Prevalence of Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection : A Narrative Review. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1. 173
(5):362-367. [Medline]. [Full Text].
48. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, Liang L, Huang H, Hong Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected
Patients. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 19. [Medline].
49. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. World Health Organization. Available at [Link] 2021 Mar 25;
Accessed: March 25, 2021.
50. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) – Cases in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available at
[Link] 2021 Mar 25; Accessed: March 25, 2021.
51. Otto MA. Wuhan Virus: What Clinicians Need to Know. Medscape Medical News. Available at
[Link] January 27, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
52. Ellis R. Coronavirus the Third-Leading Cause of Death in the U.S. Medscape Medical News. 2020 Aug 18. Available at
[Link]
53. Feuer W, Higgins-Dunn N, Lovelace B. US now has more coronavirus cases than either China or Italy. CNBC. Available at
[Link] March 26, 2020; Accessed:
March 27, 2020.
54. Price-Haywood EG, Burton J, Fort D, Seoane L. Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-
19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25. 382 (26):2534-2543. [Medline]. [Full Text].
55. Zelner J, Trangucci R, Naraharisetti R, Cao A, Malosh R, Broen K, et al. Racial disparities in COVID-19 mortality are driven by
unequal infection risks. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
56. Tai DBG, Shah A, Doubeni CA, Sia IG, Wieland ML. The Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minorities in the
United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 20. [Medline]. [Full Text].
57. Cunningham JW, Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Jering KS, Bhatt AS, Rosenthal N, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Young US Adults
Hospitalized With COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
58. Park YJ, Choe YJ, Park O, and the, COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center, Epidemiology and Case Management Team.
Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Oct. 26 (10):2465-2468.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
59. Schwartz NG, Moorman AC, Makaretz A, Chang KT, Chu VT, Szablewski CM, et al. Adolescent with COVID-19 as the Source of an
Outbreak at a 3-Week Family Gathering - Four States, June-July 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 9. 69 (40):1457-
1459. [Medline]. [Full Text].
[Link] 62/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
60. Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, Brambilla I, Bruno R, Perlini S, et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-
CoV-2) Infection in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 22. [Medline].
61. Aronoff SC, Hall A, Del Vecchio MT. The Natural History of SARS-Cov-2 Related Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
(MIS-C): A Systematic Review. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Sep 14. [Medline]. [Full Text].
62. Hoang A, Chorath K, Moreira A, Evans M, Burmeister-Morton F, Burmeister F, et al. COVID-19 in 7780 pediatric patients: A
systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul. 24:100433. [Medline]. [Full Text].
63. Ahmed M, Advani S, Moreira A, Zoretic S, Martinez J, Chorath K, et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A systematic
review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep 4. 100527. [Medline]. [Full Text].
64. Children and COVID-19: State-Level Data Report. American Academy of Pediatrics. Available at
[Link] 2021
Mar 18; Accessed: March 14, 2021.
65. Bixler D, Miller AD, Mattison CP, and the, Pediatric Mortality Investigation Team. SARS-CoV-2-Associated Deaths Among Persons
Aged MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</i>. 2020 Sep 18. 69 (37):1324-1329. [Medline]. [Full Text].
66. Chao JY, Derespina KR, Herold BC, Goldman DL, Aldrich M, Weingarten J, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of
Hospitalized and Critically Ill Children and Adolescents with Coronavirus Disease 2019 at a Tertiary Care Medical Center in New
York City. J Pediatr. 2020 Aug. 223:14-19.e2. [Medline]. [Full Text].
67. Han MS, Choi EH, Chang SH, Jin BL, Lee EJ, Kim BN, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Viral RNA Detection in Children With
Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the Republic of Korea. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Aug 28. [Medline]. [Full Text].
68. Jiang L, Tang K, Levin M, Irfan O, Morris SK, Wilson K, et al. COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and
adolescents. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov. 20 (11):e276-e288. [Medline].
69. Feldstein LR, Tenforde MW, Friedman KG, and the, Overcoming COVID-19 Investigators. Characteristics and Outcomes of US
Children and Adolescents With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Compared With Severe Acute COVID-19.
JAMA. 2021 Feb 24. [Medline]. [Full Text].
70. Delahoy MJ, Whitaker M, O’Halloran A, et al. Characteristics and maternal and birth outcomes of hospitalized pregnant women with
laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 – COVID-NET, 13 states, March 1-August 22, 2020. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 18.
[Full Text].
71. Marín Gabriel MA, Reyne Vergeli M, Caserío Carbonero S, Sole L, Carrizosa Molina T, Rivero Calle I, et al. Maternal, Perinatal and
Neonatal Outcomes With COVID-19: A Multicenter Study of 242 Pregnancies and Their 248 Infant Newborns During Their First
Month of Life. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Sep 11. [Medline].
72. Pierce-Williams RAM, Burd J, Felder L, Khoury R, Bernstein PS, Avila K, et al. Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus
disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: a United States cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug. 2 (3):100134.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
73. Adhikari EH, Moreno W, Zofkie AC, MacDonald L, McIntire DD, Collins RRJ, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes Among Women With and
Without Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2. 3 (11):e2029256. [Medline].
74. Chambers C, Krogstad P, Bertrand K, Contreras D, Tobin NH, Bode L, et al. Evaluation for SARS-CoV-2 in Breast Milk From 18
Infected Women. JAMA. 2020 Aug 19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
75. Pace RM, Williams JE, Järvinen KM, Belfort MB, Pace CD, Lackey KA, et al. COVID-19 and human milk: SARS-CoV-2, antibodies,
and neutralizing capacity. medRxiv. 2020 Sep 18. [Medline].
76. Dandachi D, Geiger G, Montgomery MW, and the, HIV-COVID-19 consortium. Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes in a
Multicenter Registry of Patients with HIV and Coronavirus Disease-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
77. Okoh AK, Bishburg E, Grinberg S, Nagarakanti S. COVID-19 Pneumonia in Patients With HIV: A Case Series. J Acquir Immune
Defic Syndr. 2020 Sep 1. 85 (1):e4-e5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
78. Karmen-Tuohy S, Carlucci PM, Zervou FN, Zacharioudakis IM, Rebick G, Klein E, et al. Outcomes Among HIV-Positive Patients
Hospitalized With COVID-19. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Sep 1. 85 (1):6-10. [Medline]. [Full Text].
79. Ho HE, Peluso MJ, Margus C, Matias Lopes JP, He C, Gaisa MM, et al. Clinical outcomes and immunologic characteristics of Covid-
19 in people with HIV. J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
80. Self WH, Tenforde MW, Stubblefield WB, and the, CDC COVID-19 Response Team IVY Network. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2
among frontline health care personnel in a multistate hospital network – 13 academic medical centers, April-June 2020. MMWR
Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Aug 31. 69:[Full Text].
81. Severe Outcomes Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) — United States, February 12–March 16, 2020.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 18. 69:[Full Text].
[Link] 63/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
82. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. 2020 Aug 25. 324 (8):782-793. [Medline].
83. Barron E, Bakhai C, Kar P, Weaver A, Bradley D, Ismail H, et al. Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID-19-related
mortality in England: a whole-population study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Aug 13. [Medline]. [Full Text].
84. Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, and the, COVID-19 Genomics Group. Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence
that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus. Cell. 2020 Aug 20. 182 (4):812-827.e19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
85. Simmonds P. Pervasive RNA Secondary Structure in the Genomes of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Coronaviruses. mBio. 2020 Oct 30.
11 (6):[Medline]. [Full Text].
86. Hou YJ, Chiba S, Halfmann P, Ehre C, Kuroda M, Dinnon KH 3rd, et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex
vivo and transmission in vivo. Science. 2020 Nov 12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
87. Volz E, Hill V, McCrone JT, and the, COG-UK Consortium. Evaluating the Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutation D614G on
Transmissibility and Pathogenicity. Cell. 2020 Nov 19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
88. Greaney AJ, Starr TN, Gilchuk P, Zost SJ, Binshtein E, Loes AN, et al. Complete Mapping of Mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike
Receptor-Binding Domain that Escape Antibody Recognition. Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Nov 19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
89. Weisblum Y, Schmidt F, Zhang F, DaSilva J, Poston D, Lorenzi JC, et al. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike
protein variants. Elife. 2020 Oct 28. 9:[Medline]. [Full Text].
90. Kemp SA, Collier DA, Datir R, Ferreira I, Gayed S, Jahun A, et al. Neutralising antibodies in Spike mediated SARS-CoV-2
adaptation. medRxiv. 2020 Dec 29. [Medline]. [Full Text].
91. Kemp SA, Harvey WT, Lytras S, and the, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium. Recurrent emergence and transmission of
a SARS-CoV-2 Spike deletion H69/V70. BioRxiv. 2020 Dec 21. [Full Text].
92. New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG) statements and meeting minutes for SARS-CoV-2
variants (VUI-202012/01 [B.1.1.7]). [Link]/government. Available at [Link]
respiratory-virus-threats-advisory-group. 2020 Dec 23; Accessed: December 30, 2020.
93. Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Geidelberg L, et al. Report 42 - Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 in
England: Insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data. Imperial College London, MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease
Analysis. Available at [Link]
[Link]. 2020 Dec 31; Accessed: January 4, 2021.
94. Galloway SE, Paul P, MacCannell DR, Johansson MA, Brooks JT, MacNeil A, et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 Lineage -
United States, December 29, 2020-January 12, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22. 70 (3):95-99. [Medline]. [Full
Text].
95. Nelson G, Oleksandr B, Spilman P, Niazi K, Rabizadeh S, Soon-Shiong P. Molecular dynamic simulation reveals E484K mutation
enhances spike RBD-ACE2 affinity and the combination of E484K, K417N and N401Y mutations (501Y.V2 variant) induces
conformational change greater than N401Y mutant alone, potentially resulting in an escape mutant. bioRxiv. 2021 Jan 13. [Full Text].
96. Sabino EC, Buss LF, Carvalho MPS, Prete CA, Crispim MAE, Fraiji NA, et al. Resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite
high seroprevalence. Lancet. 2021 Jan 27. [Full Text].
97. Burke RM, Killerby ME, Newton S, Ashworth CE, Berns AL, Brennan S, et al. Symptom Profiles of a Convenience Sample of
Patients with COVID-19 - United States, January-April 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jul 17. 69 (28):904-908.
[Medline].
98. CDC. 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Wuhan, China: Interim Guidance for Healthcare Professionals. CDC. Available at
[Link] January 17, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
99. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients. Nature.
2020 Jul 8. [Medline].
100. Hewitt J, Carter B, Vilches-Moraga A, et al. The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): a multicentre,
European, observational cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jun 30. [Medline].
101. Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, et al. The ABO blood group locus and a chromosome 3 gene cluster associate with SARS-
CoV-2 respiratory failure in an Italian-Spanish genome-wide association analysis. medRxiv. Available at
[Link] June 2, 2020; Accessed: June 8, 2020.
102. Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, et al. Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 With Respiratory Failure. NEJM.
2020 Jun 17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
103. Luers JC, Rokohl AC, Loreck N, Wawer Matos PA, Augustin M, Dewald F, et al. Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction in Coronavirus
Disease 19 (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 1. [Medline].
[Link] 64/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
104. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan,
China. Lancet. 2020 Jan 24. [Medline].
105. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 28. [Medline].
106. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel
coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15. 395 (10223):507-513. [Medline].
107. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-
Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020 Feb 7. [Medline].
108. CDC. Long-Term Effects of COVID-19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at
[Link] 2020 Nov 13; Accessed: December 11, 2020.
109. [Guideline] COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Clinical Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. National Institutes of Health.
Available at [Link] 2020 Dec 17; Accessed: January 7, 2021.
110. [Guideline] COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence (NICE). Available at [Link] 2020 Dec 18; Accessed: January 7, 2021.
111. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wie H, Low RJ, Re'em Y, et al. Characterizing Long COVIC in an international cohort: 7 months of
symptoms and their impact. medRxiv. 2020 Dec 27. [Full Text].
112. Carvalho-Schneider C, Laurent E, Lemaignen A, Beaufils E, Bourbao-Tournois C, Laribi S, et al. Follow-up of adults with noncritical
COVID-19 two months after symptom onset. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct 5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
113. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Xia L, Ren L, Xiaoying G, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from
hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021 Jan 08. [Full Text].
114. Zhao YM, Shang YM, Song WB, Li QQ, Xie H, Xu QF, et al. Follow-up study of the pulmonary function and related physiological
characteristics of COVID-19 survivors three months after recovery. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Aug. 25:100463. [Medline]. [Full Text].
115. van den Borst B, Peters JB, Brink M, Schoon Y, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Schers H, et al. Comprehensive health assessment three
months after recovery from acute COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
116. Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, McDonald D, Magedson A, Wolf CR, et al. Sequelae in Adults at 6 Months After COVID-19
Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1. 4 (2):e210830. [Medline].
117. Datta SD, Talwar A, Lee JT. A Proposed Framework and Timeline of the Spectrum of Disease Due to SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Illness
Beyond Acute Infection and Public Health Implications. JAMA. 2020 Dec 8. 324 (22):2251-2252. [Medline]. [Full Text].
118. McFadyen JD, Stevens H, Peter K. The Emerging Threat of (Micro)Thrombosis in COVID-19 and Its Therapeutic Implications. Circ
Res. 2020 Jul 31. 127 (4):571-587. [Medline]. [Full Text].
119. Kotecha T, Knight DS, Razvi Y, Kumar K, Vimalesvaran K, Thornton G, et al. Patterns of myocardial injury in recovered troponin-
positive COVID-19 patients assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 18. [Medline]. [Full Text].
120. Kang H, Wang Y, Tong Z, Liu X. Retest positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA of "recovered" patients with COVID-19: Persistence, sampling
issues, or re-infection?. J Med Virol. 2020 Jun 3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
121. Goodman B. First Confirmed Cases of COVID-19 Reinfections in US. Medscape Medical News. 2020 Oct 12. Available at
[Link]
122. Larson D, Brodniak SL, Voegtly LJ, Cer RZ, Glang LA, Malagon FJ, et al. A Case of Early Re-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Clin Infect
Dis. 2020 Sep 19. [Medline]. [Full Text].
123. To KK, Hung IF, Ip JD, Chu AW, Chan WM, Tam AR, et al. COVID-19 re-infection by a phylogenetically distinct SARS-coronavirus-2
strain confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 25. [Medline]. [Full Text].
124. Gousseff M, Penot P, Gallay L, in behalf of the COCOREC study group. Clinical recurrences of COVID-19 symptoms after recovery:
Viral relapse, reinfection or inflammatory rebound?. J Infect. 2020 Jun 30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
125. Tillett RL, Sevinsky JR, Hartley PD, Kerwin H, rawford N, Gorzalski A, et al. Genomic evidence for reinfection with SARS-CoV-2: a
case study. Lancet Inf Dis. 2020 Oct 12. [Full Text].
126. CDC. 2019 Novel Coronavirus, Wuhan, China: Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. CDC. Available at
[Link] January 27, 2020; Accessed: January 27, 2020.
127. FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: Daily Roundup. [Link]. Available at [Link]
announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-daily-roundup. March 23, 2020; Accessed: March 31, 2020.
128. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in
Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 13. [Medline].
[Link] 65/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
129. Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Gu J, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan,
China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 24. [Medline].
130. Zhao W, Zhong Z, Xie X, Yu Q, Liu J. Relation Between Chest CT Findings and Clinical Conditions of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-
19) Pneumonia: A Multicenter Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Mar 3. 1-6. [Medline].
131. Bai HX, Hsieh B, Xiong Z, Halsey K, Choi JW, Tran TML, et al. Performance of radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 from viral
pneumonia on chest CT. Radiology. 2020 Mar 10. 200823. [Medline].
132. ACR. ACR Recommendations for the use of Chest Radiography and Computed Tomography (CT) for Suspected COVID-19
Infection. American College of Radiology. Available at [Link]
Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection. March 22, 2020; Accessed: April
2, 2020.
133. Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, Jin G, Chen Y, Xu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened
among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China Life Sci. 2020 Mar 4. [Medline].
134. Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X, Luo N, Ling L. Clinical outcome of 55 asymptomatic cases at the time of hospital admission infected
with SARS-Coronavirus-2 in Shenzhen, China. J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 17. [Medline].
135. Li M, Lei P, Zeng B, Li Z, Yu P, Fan B, et al. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Spectrum of CT Findings and Temporal Progression
of the Disease. Acad Radiol. 2020 Mar 20. [Medline].
136. Wong HYF, Lam HYS, Fong AH, Leung ST, Chin TW, Lo CSY, et al. Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in
COVID-19 Positive Patients. Radiology. 2019 Mar 27. 201160. [Medline].
137. Bogoch II, Watts A, Thomas-Bachli A, Huber C, Kraemer MUG, Khan K. Pneumonia of Unknown Etiology in Wuhan, China: Potential
for International Spread Via Commercial Air Travel. J Travel Med. 2020 Jan 14. [Medline].
138. Fact sheet for health care providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of bamlanivimab. United States Food and Drug
Administration. Available at [Link] 2021 Feb (revised); Accessed: February10, 2021.
139. Fact sheet for health care providers emergency use authorization (EUA) of bamlanivimab and etesevimab. United States Food and
Drug Administration. Available at [Link] 2021 Feb 09; Accessed: February 10, 2021.
140. WHO. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with COVID-19. WHO. Available at
[Link]
covid-19. April 19, 2020; Accessed: June 16, 2020.
141. Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, O’Mera MJ, et al. A SARS-CoV-2-Human Protein-Protein Interaction Map
Reveals Drug Targets and Potential Drug-Repurposing. bioRxiv. Available at
[Link] 2020 Mar 22; Accessed: March 23, 2020.
142. Lundgren JD, Brund B, Barkauskas CE, and the ACTIV-3/TICO Ly-CoV555 Study Group. A Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for
Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 22. [Medline]. [Full Text].
143. I-SPY COVID-19 TRIAL: An Adaptive Platform Trial for Critically Ill Patients (I-SPY_COVID). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Aug 12; Accessed: August 25, 2020.
144. Arshad U, Pertinez H, Box H, Tatham L, Rajoki RKR, Curley P, et al. Prioritisation of potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug repurposing
opportunities based on ability to achieve adequate target site concentrations derived from their established human
pharmacokinetics. medRxiv. 2020 Apr 22. [Full Text].
145. World Health Organization. “Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments. WHO. Available at
[Link]
clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments. 2020 Oct 16; Accessed: October 16, 2020.
146. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 - Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results. N Engl J Med.
2020 Dec 2. [Medline]. [Full Text].
147. Kalil AC. Treating COVID-19-Off-Label Drug Use, Compassionate Use, and Randomized Clinical Trials During Pandemics. JAMA.
2020 Mar 24. [Medline]. [Full Text].
148. Rome BN, Avorn J. Drug Evaluation during the Covid-19 Pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 14. [Medline]. [Full Text].
149. Marcia Frellick. Key Drugs Join PPEs on List of Front-Line Shortages. Medscape Medical News. 2020 Apr 02. Available at
[Link]
150. Live Updates: Which Drugs Are In Shortage Because of COVID-19?. GoodRx. Available at [Link]
drug-shortages-updates/. Accessed: April 15, 2020.
151. Wilson FP. Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: What’s the Evidence? (Commentary). Medscape Medical News and Perspectives.
2020 Mar 25. Available at [Link]
[Link] 66/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
152. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Community-Related Exposures. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Available at [Link] March 30, 2020; Accessed: April
2, 2020.
153. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Travel-Associated Exposures. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available
at [Link] March 30, 2020; Accessed: April 3, 2020.
154. Leung NHL, Chu DKW, Shiu EYC, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med. 2020.
[Full Text].
155. Smith JD, MacDougall CC, Johnstone J, Copes RA, Schwartz B, Garber GE. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks
in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188
(8):567-574. [Medline].
156. TLR 2/6/9 agonist PUL-042. NCI Drug Dictionary. Available at [Link]
6-9-agonist-pul-042. Accessed: 2020 Apr 13.
157. The Use PUL-042 Inhalation Solution to Prevent COVID-19 in Adults Exposed to SARS-CoV-2. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Mar 24;
158. The Use of PUL-042 Inhalation Solution to Reduce the Severity of COVID-19 in Adults Positive for SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
[Link]. Available at [Link]
042&cond=COVID&cntry=US&draw=2&rank=2. 2020 May 07; Accessed: May 8, 2020.
159. FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Issues Emergency Use Authorization for Potential COVID-19 Treatment. [Link].
Available at [Link]
authorization-potential-covid-19-treatment. May 01, 2020; Accessed: May 01, 2020.
160. COVID-19 Update: FDA Broadens Emergency Use Authorization for Veklury (remdesivir) to Include All Hospitalized Patients for
Treatment of COVID-19. US Food and Drug Administration. 2020 Aug 28. Available at [Link]
announcements/covid-19-update-fda-broadens-emergency-use-authorization-veklury-remdesivir-include-all-hospitalized?
utm_campaign=FDA%20Broadens%20Emergency%20Use%20Authorization%20for%20Veklury%20%28Remdesivir%29%20to%.
161. Study in participants with early stage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of
remdesivir administered by inhalation. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020
Dec 09; Accessed: January 6, 2021.
162. Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, and, the Washington State 2019-nCoV Case Investigation Team. First Case of 2019 Novel
Coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5. 382 (10):929-936. [Medline].
163. National Institutes of Health. NIH clinical trial of remdesivir to treat COVID-19 begins. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Available at [Link] 2020 Feb
25; Accessed: March 24, 2020.
164. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC, et al. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
165. Harrington DP, Baden LR, Hogan JW. A Large, Simple Trial Leading to Complex Questions. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 2. [Medline].
[Full Text].
166. Goldman JD, Lye DCB, Hui DS, Marks KM, Bruno R, Montejano R, et al. Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe Covid-
19. N Engl J Med. November 5, 2020. 383:1827-1837. [Medline]. [Full Text].
167. Spinner CD, Gottlieb RL, Criner GJ, and the, GS-US-540-5774 Investigators. Effect of Remdesivir vs Standard Care on Clinical
Status at 11 Days in Patients With Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Aug 21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
168. Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Remdesivir (GS-5734) in Participants From Birth to < 18
Years of Age With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (CARAVAN). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jun 01; Accessed: July 14, 2020.
169. Chiotos K, Hayes M, Kimberlin DW, Jones SB, James SH, Pinninti SG, et al. Multicenter interim guidance on use of antivirals for
children with COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Sep 12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
170. Burwick RM, Yawetz S, Stephenson KE, Collier AY, Sen P, Blackburn BG, et al. Compassionate Use of Remdesivir in Pregnant
Women with Severe Covid-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
171. McCoy JA, Short WR, Srinivas SK, Levine LD, Hirshberg A. Compassionate use of remdesivir for treatment of severe coronavirus
disease 2019 in pregnant women at a United States academic center. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug. 2 (3):100164.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
172. Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir (MK-4482) in Hospitalized Adult Participants With COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2021 Mar12; Accessed: March 12, 2021.
[Link] 67/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
173. Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir (MK-4482) in Non-Hospitalized Adult Participants With COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2021 Mar 12; Accessed: March 12, 2021.
174. Ivashchenko AA, Dmitriev KA, Vostokova NV, Azarova VN, Blinow AA, Egorova AN, et al. AVIFAVIR for Treatment of Patients with
Moderate COVID-19: Interim Results of a Phase II/III Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 9. [Medline].
[Full Text].
175. Oral favipiravir compared to placebo in subjects with mild COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Oct 05; Accessed: December 3, 2020.
176. Study of the use of favipiravir in hospitalized subjects with COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Nov 06; Accessed: December 3, 2020.
177. Control of COVID-19 outbreaks in long term care. [Link]. Available at [Link]
2020 Jun 25; Accessed: August 11, 2020.
178. Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nitazoxanide (NTZ) for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 and Other Viral
Respiratory Illnesses in Elderly Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCF). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Apr 16;
Accessed: April 28, 2020.
179. Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nitazoxanide (NTZ) for Pre- or Post Exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 and Other Viral
Respiratory Illnesses (VRI) in Healthcare Workers. [Link]. Available at [Link]
term=nitazoxanide&recrs=ab&cond=COVID&draw=2&rank=5. 2020 Apr 24; Accessed: April 28, 2020.
180. Romark initiates new phase 3 clinical trial of NT-300 for the treatment of COVID-19. Romark Pharmaceuticals. 2020 Aug 11.
Available at [Link]
181. Niclosamide in moderate COVID-19. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 18;
Accessed: August 7, 2020.
182. ANA Therapeutics begins phase 2/3 clinical trial of proprietary oral niclosamide formulation to treat COVID-19. Businesswire. 2020
Oct 26. Available at [Link]
Trial-of-Proprietary-Oral-Niclosamide-Formulation-to-Treat-COVID-19.
183. Ingraham NE, Lotfi-Emran S, Thielen BK, Techar K, Morris RS, Holtan SG, et al. Immunomodulation in COVID-19. Lancet Respir
Med. 2020 May 4. [Medline]. [Full Text].
184. Rizk JG, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Mehra MR, Lavie CJ, Rizk Y, Forthal DN. Pharmaco-Immunomodulatory Therapy in COVID-19. Drugs.
2020 Sep. 80 (13):1267-1292. [Medline]. [Full Text].
185. Wagner JL, Veve MP, Barber KE. Using IL-6 inhibitors to treat COVID-19. ContagionLive. Available at
[Link]
ekey=c2NiZXJnbWFuQG5lYnJhc2thbWVkLmNvbQ. 2020 Aug 17; Accessed: August 18, 2020.
186. [Guideline] NIH. The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel’s Statement on the Use of Tocilizumab (and Other Interleukin-6
Inhibitors) for the Treatment of COVID-19. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. Available at
[Link] 2021 Mar 05; Accessed: March 12,
2021.
187. Salama C, Han J, Yau L, Reiss WG, Kramer B, Neidhart JD, et al. Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia. N
Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7. 384 (1):20-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
188. Gordon AC, Mouncey PR, Al-Beidh F, and the, REMAP-CAP Investigators. Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients
with Covid-19 – Preliminary report. medRxiv. 2021 Jan 07. [Full Text].
189. Horby PW, Pessoa-Amorim G, Peto L, and the, RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with
COVID-19 (RECOVERY): preliminary results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, platform trial. medRxiv. 2021 Feb 11. [Full
Text].
190. Stone JH, Frigault MJ, Serling-Boyd NJ, and the, BACC Bay Tocilizumab Trial Investigators. Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients
Hospitalized with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
191. Genentech provides an update on the phase III COVACTA trial of Actemra in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 associated
pneumonia. Genentech. 2020 Jul 28. Available at [Link]
provides-an-update-on-the-phas.
192. Price CC, Altice FL, Shyr Y, Koff A, Pischel L, Goshua G, et al. Tocilizumab treatment for Cytokine Release Syndrome in hospitalized
COVID-19 patients: survival and clinical outcomes. Chest. 2020 Jun 15. [Medline]. [Full Text].
193. Jordan SC, Zakowski P, Tran HP, Smith EA, Gaultier C, Marks G, et al. Compassionate Use of Tocilizumab for Treatment of SARS-
CoV-2 Pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 23. [Medline]. [Full Text].
[Link] 68/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
194. Somers EC, Eschenauer GA, Troost JP, Golob JL, Gandhi TN, Wang L, et al. Tocilizumab for treatment of mechanically ventilated
patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
196. Cavalli G, DeLuca G, Campochiraro C, Della-Torre E, Ripa M, Canetti D, et al. Interleukin-1 blockade with high-dose anakinra in
patients with COVID-19, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and hyperinflammation: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet
Rheumatol. 2020 May 07. [Full Text].
197. Huet T, Beaussier H, Voisin O, Jouveshomme S, Daurait Gaelle, Lazareth I, et al. Anakinra for severe forms of COVID-19: a cohort
study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 May 29. [Full Text].
198. Novartis provides update on CAN-COVID trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and cytokine release syndrome
(CRS). Novartis. 2020 Nov 06. Available at [Link]
hospitalized-patients-covid-19-pneumonia-and-cytokine-release-syndrome-crs.
199. Intereukin-7 to improve clinical outcomes in lymphopenic patients with COVID-19 infection FR BL Cohort (ILIAD-7-FR).
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 22; Accessed: November 16, 2020.
200. Interleukin-7 (CYT107 to improve clinical outcomes in lymphopenic patients with COVID-19 infection UK cohort (ILIAD-7-UK).
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 May 15; Accessed: November 16, 2020.
201. Laterre PF, François B, Collienne C, Hantson P, Jeannet R, Remy KE, et al. Association of Interleukin 7 Immunotherapy With
Lymphocyte Counts Among Patients With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1. 3
(7):e2016485. [Medline]. [Full Text].
202. Stebbing J, Phelan A, Griffin I, Tucker C, Oechsle O, Smith D, et al. COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory
treatments. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr. 20 (4):400-402. [Medline]. [Full Text].
203. Richardson P, Griffin I, Tucker C, Smith D, Oechsle O, Phelan A, et al. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute
respiratory disease. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15. 395 (10223):e30-e31. [Medline]. [Full Text].
204. Stebbing J, Krishnan V, de Bono S, Ottaviani S, Casalini G, Richarson PJ, et al. Mechanism of baricitinib supports artificial
intelligence-predicted testing in COVID-19 patients. 2020 Apr 15. [Full Text].
205. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and
immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28. 395 (10229):1033-1034. [Medline]. [Full Text].
206. Kalil AC, Patterson TF, Mehta AK, Tomashek KM, Wolfe CR, Ghazaryan V, et al. Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults
with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
207. A study of baricitinib (LY3009104) in participants with COVID-19 (COV-BARRIER). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jun 09;
208. Rodriguez-Garcia JL, Sanchez-Nievas G, Arevalo-Serrano J, Garcia-Gomez C, Jimenez-Vizuete JM, Martinez-Alfaro E. Baricitinib
improves respiratory function in patients treated with corticosteroids for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: an observational cohort study.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
209. Cantini F, Niccoli L, Matarrese D, Nicastri E, Stobbione P, Goletti D. Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: A pilot study on safety and
clinical impact. J Infect. 2020 Apr 23. [Medline]. [Full Text].
210. CTI Biopharma announces enrollment of first patient in COVID-19 PRE-VENT phase 3 clinical trial. CTI Biopharma. 2020 Jun 01.
Available at [Link]
pre.
211. TD-0903 for ALI associated with COVID-19. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020
Jun 26; Accessed: August 11, 2020.
212. RECOVERY Collaborative Group., Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 -
Preliminary Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
213. [Guideline] Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected. World
Health Organization. Available at [Link]
when-novel-coronavirus-(ncov)-infection-is-suspected. 2020 Mar 13; Accessed: March 24, 2020.
214. Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020
Feb 15. 395 (10223):473-475. [Medline].
215. [Guideline] Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the
Management of Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun. 48 (6):e440-e469.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
[Link] 69/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
216. WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. Association Between Administration of Systemic
Corticosteroids and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020 Sep 2. [Medline]. [Full Text].
217. Prescott HC, Rice TW. Corticosteroids in COVID-19 ARDS: Evidence and Hope During the Pandemic. JAMA. 2020 Sep 2. [Medline].
[Full Text].
218. [Guideline] WHO. Corticosteroids for COVID-19 – Living Guidance. World Health Organization. Available at
[Link] 2020 Sep 02; Accessed: September 3, 2020.
219. Fadel R, Morrison AR, Vahia A, Smith ZR, Chaudhry Z, Bhargava P, et al. Early Short Course Corticosteroids in Hospitalized
Patients with COVID-19. medRxiv. 2020 May 05. [Full Text].
220. Ramiro S, Mostard RLM, Magro-Checa C, van Dongen CMP, Dormans T, Buijs J, et al. Historically controlled comparison of
glucocorticoids with or without tocilizumab versus supportive care only in patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine storm
syndrome: results of the CHIC study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jul 20. [Medline]. [Full Text].
221. Keller MJ, Kitsis EA, Arora S, Chen JT, Agarwal S, Ross MJ, et al. Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on mortality or mechanical
ventilation in patients with COVID-19. J Hosp Med. 2020 Aug. 15(8):489-493. [Full Text].
222. Evaluating AVM0703 for treatment of COVID-19 or influenza-mediated ARDS. AVM Biotechnology LCC. Available at
[Link] 2020 Sep 18; Accessed: September 22, 2020.
223. Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers - Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma for Treatment of
COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at [Link]
2020 Aug 23; Accessed: August 23, 2020.
224. Joyner MJ, Carter RE, Senefeld JW, Klassen SA, Mills JR, Johnson PW, et al. Convalescent plasma antibody levels and the risk of
death from Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 13. [Full Text].
225. NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Statement on the emergency use authorization of convalescent plasma for the
treatment of COVID-19. National Institutes of Health. Available at [Link]
convalescent-plasma-eua/. 2020 Oct 09; Accessed: January 9, 2021.
226. NIAID. NIH clinical trial testing remdesivir plus interferon beta-1a for COVID-19 treatment begins. National Institutes of Health.
Available at [Link]
begins. 2020 Aug 05; Accessed: August 7, 2020.
228. Chen L, Liu P, Gao H, Sun B, Chao D, Wang F, et al. Inhalation of nitric oxide in the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome:
a rescue trial in Beijing. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 15. 39 (10):1531-5. [Medline].
229. A study to assess pulsed inhaled nitric oxide vs placebo in subjects with mild or moderate COVID-19 (COViNOX). [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 Sep 09; Accessed: November 25, 2020.
230. Schönbeck U, Libby P. Inflammation, immunity, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: statins as antiinflammatory agents?. Circulation.
2004 Jun 1. 109 (21 Suppl 1):II18-26. [Medline]. [Full Text].
231. Virani SS. Is There a Role For Statin Therapy in Acute Viral Infections?. Cardiology Magazine - American College of Cardiology.
2020 Mar 18. Available at [Link]
acute-viral-infections-covid-19.
232. Hariyanto TI, Kurniawan A. Statin therapy did not improved the in-hospital outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
infection. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Aug 26. 14(6):1613-1615. [Medline]. [Full Text].
233. Kow CS, Hasan SS. Meta-analysis of Effect of Statins in Patients with COVID-19. Am J Cardiol. 2020 Aug 12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
234. Castiglione V, Chiriacò M, Emdin M, Taddei S, Vergaro G. Statin therapy in COVID-19 infection. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc
Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1. 6 (4):258-259. [Medline]. [Full Text].
235. [Guideline] NIH. Covid-19 Treatment Guidelines - Adjunctive Therapy. National Institutes of Health. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 17; Accessed: July 31, 2020.
236. Yao JS, Paguio JA, Dee EC, Tan HC, Moulick A, Milazzo C, et al. The minimal effect of zinc on the survival of hospitalized patients
with Covid-19: an observational study. Chest. 2020 Jul 22. [Medline]. [Full Text].
237. Meltzer DO, Best TJ, Zhang H, Vokes T, Arora V, Solway J. Association of Vitamin D Status and Other Clinical Characteristics With
COVID-19 Test Results. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1. 3 (9):e2019722. [Medline]. [Full Text].
238. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Tradipitant in Treating Inflammatory Lung Injury
and Improving Clinical Outcomes Associated With Severe or Critical COVID-19. (NCT04326426). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 70/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
[Link] 2020 Mar 30; Accessed:
2020 Apr 03.
239. Vanda Pharmaceuticals’ interim analysis from ODYSSEY study shows tradipitant may accelerate clinical improvement in patients
with COVID-19 pneumonia. Vanda Pharmaceuticals. 2020 Aug 18. Available at [Link]
[Link]/node/14256/pdf.
240. Aprepitant injectable emulsion in patients with COVID-19 (GUARDS-1). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 17; Accessed: July 23, 2020.
242. A study to assess the efficacy and safety of gimsilumab in subjects with lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary
to coronavirus disease 2019. [Link]. Available at [Link]
term=gimsilumab&draw=2&rank=1. 2020 Apr 17; Accessed: April 17, 2020.
243. Roivant Announces Development of Anti-GM-CSF Monoclonal Antibody to Prevent and Treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
(ARDS) in Patients with COVID-19. Roivant Sciences. 2020 Mar 18. Available at [Link] Announces Development of Anti-GM-
CSF Monoclonal Antibody to Prevent and Treat Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Patients with COVID-19.
244. DeLuca G, Cavalli G, Campochiaro C, Della-Torre E, Angelillo P, Tomelleri A, et al. GM-CSF blockage with mavrilimumab in severe
COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation: a single-centre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Rheum. 2020 Jun 16. [Full
Text].
245. Study of mavrilimumab (KPL-301) in participants hospitalized with severe corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and
hyper-inflammation. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jul 21; Accessed:
July 23, 2020.
246. Investigating otilimab in patients with severe pulmonary COVID-19 related disease (OSCAR). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Aug 25; Accessed: August 26, 2020.
247. Phase 3 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of lenzilumab in patients with COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Aug 05; Accessed: August 7, 2020.
248. I-MAB Biopharma Announces Development of TJM2 to Treat Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with Severe and Critically-Ill
Patients with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). I-MAB Biopharma. 2020 Mar 13. Available at [Link]
[Link]/en/[Link].
249. FDA grants fast track designation for remestemcel-L in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19.
Mesoblast. 2020 Dec 01. Available at [Link]
250. MSCs in COVID-19 ARDS. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Nov 06;
Accessed: December 3, 2020.
251. U.S. FDA clears Pluristem’s IND application for phase II COVID-19 study. Pluristem Therapeutics, Inc. 2020 May 08. Available at
[Link]
252. NantKwest announces FDA authorization of IND application for mesenchymal stem cell product for the treatment of severe COVID-
19 patients. NantKwest. 2020 May 18. Available at [Link]
for-mesenchymal-stem-cell-product-for-the-treatment-of-severe-covid-19-patients/.
253. Efficacy and safety study of allogeneic HB-adMSCs for the treatment of COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Aug 12; Accessed: September 11, 2020.
254. FDA approves study to investigate the use of cell therapy to treat COVID-19 related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
(MIS-C). PR Newswire. 2020 Sep 16. Available at [Link]
[Link].
255. Extracellular vesicle infusion therapy for severe COVID-19 (EXIT COVID-19). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 30; Accessed: October 19, 2020.
256. MediciNova announces opening of investigational new drug application for MN-166 (ibudilast) for prevention of acute respiratory
distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. MediciNova. 2020 Jul 01. Available at [Link]
releases/news-release-details/medicinova-announces-opening-investigational-new-drug-1.
257. Safety and efficacy of NP-120 (ifenprodil) for the treatment of hospitalized patient with confirmed COVID-19 disease.
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jul 09; Accessed: July 21, 2020.
[Link] 71/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
259. Alexion provides update on phase 3 study of Ultomiris (ravulizumab-cwvz) in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Alexion
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2021 Jan 13. Available at [Link]
phase-3-study-ultomirisr-ravulizumab.
260. Intravenous aviptadil for critical COVID-19 with respiratory failure (COVID-AIV). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Oct 30; Accessed: November 25, 2020.
261. RLF-100 (aviptadil) intermediate population expanded access (SAMICARE). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Oct 22; Accessed: November 25, 2020.
262. Inhaled aviptadil for the treatment of moderate and severe COVID-19 (AVICOVID-2). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Oct 30; Accessed: November 25, 2020.
263. Study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ATYR1923 in patients with severe pneumonia related to COVID-19. [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 04;
264. Evaluation of Safety & Efficacy of BIO-11006 Inhalation Solution in Patients with ARDS. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2018 Dec 06; Accessed: Apr 24, 2020.
265. Chimerix Announces Initiation of a Phase 2/3 Study of DSTAT in Acute Lung Injury for Patients with Severe COVID-19. Chimerix.
2020 Apr 29. Available at [Link]
dstat-acute-lung.
266. A study of opaganib in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia (COVID-19). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 31;
267. Opaganib, a sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2) inhibitor in COVID-19 pneumonia. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 17; Accessed: July 31, 2020.
268. LB1148 Now Available for Investigational Use to Treat Pulmonary Dysfunction Associated with COVID-19 Pneumonia. Leading
BioSciences. 2020 May 15. Available at [Link]
[Link].
269. Phase III DAS181 Lower Tract PIV Infection in Immunocompromised Subjects (Substudy: DAS181 for COVID-19): RCT Study.
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020
Apr 17;
270. Applied Therapeutics Announces IND and Investigator-Initiated Studies of AT-001 in Critical COVID-19 Patients. Applied
Therapeutics. 2020 Apr 02. Available at [Link]
announces-ind-and-investigator-initiated.
271. Miller J, Bruen C, Schnaus M, Zhang J, Ali S, Lind A, et al. Auxora versus standard of care for the treatment of severe or critical
COVID-19 pneumonia: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Research Square. 2020 Jul 15. [Full Text].
272. Biohaven receives FDA may proceed letter to begin phase 2 trial of intranasal vazegepant to treat lung inflammation after COVID-19
infection. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. 2020 Apr 09. Available at [Link]
releases/04-09-2020.
273. Evaluation of activity and safety of oral selinexor in participants with severe COVID-19 infection (coronavirus). [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 May 08; Accessed: October 7, 2020.
274. Evelo Biosciences, Rutgers University, and Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital Announce Submission of IND for a Phase 2
Study of EDP1815 in COVID-19 Patients. Evelo Biosciences. 2020 May 07. Available at [Link]
release-details/evelo-biosciences-rutgers-university-and-robert-wood-johnson.
275. Evelo Biosciences announces EDP1815 to advance into phase 2/3 TACTIC-E COVID-19 trial. Evelo Biosciences. 2020 Jun 22.
Available at [Link]
tactic-e.
276. VERU-111 suppresses key cytokines responsible for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19. Veru, Inc. 2020 Aug
04. Available at [Link]
syndrome-in-covid-19/.
277. Q BioMed partner Mannin Research developing potential treatment for patients infected with coronavirus and other infectious
diseases. Q BioMed. 2020 Feb 04. Available at [Link]
research-developing-potential-treatment-for-patients-infected-with-coronavirus-and-other-infectious-diseases.
278. Diffusion Pharmaceuticals receives FDA guidance for international phase 1b/2b COVID-19 clinical program with TSC. Diffusion
Pharmaceuticals. 2020 July 27. Available at [Link]
Pharmaceuticals-Receives-FDA-Guidance-for-International-Phase-1b2b-COVID-19-Clinical-Program-with-TSC/[Link].
[Link] 72/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
279. NCI drug Dictionary. Trans sodium crocetinate. NIH, National Cancer Institute. Available at
[Link] Accessed: 2020 May 28.
280. FDA authorizes OPKO Health clinical trial evaluating Rayaldee in COVID-19 patients. OPKO Health. 2020 Jun 01. Available at
[Link]
282. Ashvattha Therapeutics subsidiary Orpheris announces FDA agreement to initiate phase 2 study evaluating OP-101 in severe
COVID-19 patients. Ashvattha Therapeutics. 2020 May 28. Available at [Link]
announces-fda-agreement-to-initiate-phase-2-study-evaluating-op-101-in-severe-covid-19-patients/.
283. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of IMU-838 as Addition to Investigator's Choice of Standard of Care
Therapy, in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 May 11;
284. Immunic, Inc. announces first patients enrolled in investigator-sponsored phase 2 clinical trial of IMU-838 in combination with
oseltamivir for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Immunic, Inc. 2020 Jul 27. Available at
[Link]
2-clinical-trial-of-imu-838-in-combination-with-oseltamivir-for-the-treatment-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-covid-19/.
285. Oryzon announces enrollment of first patient in ESCAPE: a Phase II clinical trial with vafidemstat in severely ill COVID-19 patients.
Oryzon Genomics. 2020 May 18. Available at [Link]
286. Bhatt DL. First Human Trial of a Loading Dose of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients with COVID-19: Primary Results of the Vascepa
COVID-19 CardioLink-9 Randomized Trial. Presented at the National Lipid Association Scientific Sessions December 12, 2020. [Full
Text].
288. Konig MF, Powell M, Staedtke V, Bai RY, Thomas DL, Fischer N, et al. Preventing cytokine storm syndrome in COVID-19 using α-1
adrenergic receptor antagonists. J Clin Invest. 2020 May 26. [Medline]. [Full Text].
289. Study of Ampion for the treatment of adult COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen supplementation. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 24;
290. Fulcrum Therapeutics Announces Initiation of Multi-Center Phase 3 (LOSVID) Trial with Losmapimod for Hospitalized COVID-19
Patients. Fulcrum Therapeutics. 2020 Jun 24. Available at [Link]
therapeutics-announces-initiation-multi-center-phase-3.
291. Durect Corporation announces initiation of patient recruitment in phase 2 safety and efficacy study of DUR-928 in COVID-19 patients
with acute liver or kidney injury. Durect Corporation. 2020 Jul 01. Available at [Link]
release-details/durect-corporation-announces-initiation-patient-recruitment?field_nir_news_date_value[min]=2020.
292. Aclaris Therapeutics Supports Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial of ATI-450 for Cytokine Release Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients
with COVID-19. Aclaris Therapeutics. 2020 Jun 17. Available at [Link]
details/aclaris-therapeutics-supports-investigator-initiated-clinical.
293. Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leronlimab for mild to moderate COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jun 11; Accessed: July 13, 2020.
294. Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leronlimab for patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 11; Accessed: July 13, 2020.
295. Biophytis receives FDA IND clearance for COVA, a phase 2/3 clinical trial with sarconeos (BIO101) for the treatment of patients with
COVID-19 related respiratory failure. Biophytis. 2020 Jul 01. Available at [Link]
content/uploads/2020/07/[Link].
296. FDA clears abivertinib for Phase 2 safety and efficacy study in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Sorrento
Therapeutics. 2020 July 20. Available at [Link]
abivertinib-phase-2-safety-and-efficacy-study.
297. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of nangibotide in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and features of systemic
inflammation. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 12; Accessed: July 23,
2020.
298. Can-Fite Submits Investigational New Drug Application to U.S. FDA for COVID-19 Phase II Study. Can-Fite BioPharma. 2020 Jul 27.
Available at [Link]
19-phase-ii-study.
[Link] 73/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
299. LSALT peptide vs placebo to prevent ARDS and acute kidney injury in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 16; Accessed: : July 28, 2020.
300. ReAlta Life Sciences announces U.S. FDA clearance of first investigational new drug application for RLS-0071. ReAlta Life
Sciences. 2020 Jul 28. Available at [Link]
investigational-new-drug-application-for-rls-0071/.
301. Safety and antiviral activity of BLD-2660 in COVID-19 hospitalized subjects. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Sep 03; Accessed: September 15, 2020.
302. Enzychem Lifesciences announces FDA acceptance of phase 2 study of EC-18 in preventing acute respiratory distress Syndrome
(ARDS) due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Enzychem Lifesciences. 2020 Aug 14. Available at [Link]
lifesciences-announces-fda-acceptance-of-phase-2-study-of-ec-18-in-preventing-acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome-ards-due-to-
covid-19-pneumonia/.
303. A study of cell therapy in COVID-19 subjects with acute kidney injury who are receiving renal replacement therapy. [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 Aug 13; Accessed: August 19, 2020.
304. BCG Vaccine for Health Care Workers as Defense Against COVID 19 (BADAS). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 May 27; Accessed: August 19, 2020.
305. Synthetic cannabinoid drug for COVID-19 approved for phase 1 clinical trials. Forbes. 2020 Aug 20. Available at
[Link]
trials/#7b9374223329.
306. Intravenous infusion of CAP-1002 in patients with COVID-19 (INSPIRE). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Nov 24; Accessed: November 25, 2020.
307. Study of LAU-7b for the treatment of COVID-19 disease in adults (RESOLUTION). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 17; Accessed: August 26, 2020.
309. Rigel Announces NIH/NHLBI-sponsored trial of fostamatinib in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in collaboration with Inova. Rigel
Pharmaceuticals. 2020 Sep 17. Available at [Link]
sponsored-trial-of-fostamatinib.
310. Vadadustat for the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19). [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Sep 10;
Accessed: September 22, 2020.
311. FSD Pharma begins Phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate FSD201 for the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. FSD Pharma Inc.
2020 Sep 28. Available at [Link]
treatment-of-hospitalized-covid-19-patients/.
312. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EB05 + SOC vs. placebo + SOC in adult
hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jul 01; Accessed: October 26, 2020.
313. Lenze EJ, Mattar C, Zorumski CF, Stevens A, Schweiger J, Nicol GE, et al. Fluvoxamine vs Placebo and Clinical Deterioration in
Outpatients With Symptomatic COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Nov 12. [Medline]. [Full Text].
314. COVID R&D Alliance launches trial of Amgen, UCB, Takeda drugs. Reuters. 2020 Nov 30. Available at
[Link]
idUSL1N2I31W4.
315. Hepion Pharmaceuticals announces FDA clearance of IND application for CRV431 for COVID-19. Hepion Pharmaceuticals. 2020
Dec 22. Available at [Link]
crv431-for-covi/4573734.
316. Study of ensifentrine or placebo delivered via pMDI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Dec 14; Accessed: January 14, 2021.
317. Tiziana Life Sciences Announces an Expedited Clinical Development Plan for Its Anti-Interleukin-6-Receptor, a Fully Human
Monoclonal Antibody, for the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients. Tiziana Life Sciences. 2021 Aug 04. Available at
[Link]
[Link] 74/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
319. CD24Fc as a nonantiviral immunomodulator in COVID-19 treatment (SAC-COVID). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Apr 10;
320. The COVID-19 treatment guidelines panel’s statement on the emergency use authorization of bamlanivimab for the treatment of
COVID-19. [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Nov 18;
Accessed: November 19, 2020.
321. Chen P, Nirula A, Heller B, Gottlieb RL, Boscia J, Morris J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody LY-CoV555 in Outpatients with
Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 28. [Medline]. [Full Text].
322. Gottlieb RL, Nirula A, Chen P, Boscia J, Heller B, Morris J, et al. Effect of Bamlanivimab as Monotherapy or in Combination With
Etesevimab on Viral Load in Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Jan 21. [Medline].
[Full Text].
323. A Study of LY3819253 (LY-CoV555) in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 in Nursing Home Residents and Staff
(BLAZE-2). [Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Oct 30; Accessed: October
30, 2020.
324. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of anti-spike (S) SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies for hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19.
[Link]. Available at [Link] 2020 Oct 01; Accessed: October 2, 2020.
325. REGN-COV2 independent data monitoring committee recommends holding enrollment in hospitalized patients with high oxygen
requirements and continuing enrollment in patients with low or no oxygen requirements. Regeneron. 2020 Oct 30. Available at
[Link]
recommends.
326. Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, et al. REGN-COV2, a Neutralizing Antibody Cocktail, in
Outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
327. Regeneron’s COVID-19 outpatient trial prospectively demonstrates that REGN-COV2 antibody cocktail significantly reduced virus
levels and need for further medical attention. Regeneron. 2020 Oct 28. Available at [Link]
releases/news-release-details/regenerons-covid-19-outpatient-trial-prospectively-demonstrates.
328. Phase 3 trial shows REGEN-COV (casirivimab with imdevimab) antibody cocktail reduced hospitalization or death by 70% in non-
hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Regeneron. 2021 Mar 23. Available at [Link]
details/phase-3-trial-shows-regen-covtm-casirivimab-imdevimab-antibody.
329. Regeneron announces encouraging initial data from COVID-19 antibody cocktail trial in hospitalized patients on low-flow oxygen.
PRNewswire. 2020 Dec 29. Available at [Link]
encouraging-initial-data-covid-19-antibody.
330. Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker. The New York Times. Available at [Link]
[Link]. 2020 Dec 09; Accessed: December 9, 2020.
331. Lurie N, Saville M, Hatchett R, Halton J. Developing Covid-19 Vaccines at Pandemic Speed. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21. 382
(21):1969-1973. [Medline]. [Full Text].
332. Koirala A, Joo YJ, Khatami A, Chiu C, Britton PN. Vaccines for COVID-19: The current state of play. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep.
35:43-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].
333. McClung N, Chamberland M, Kinlaw K, Bowen Matthew D, Wallace M, Bell BP, et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices' Ethical Principles for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep. 2020 Nov 27. 69 (47):1782-1786. [Medline]. [Full Text].
334. Iba T, Levy JH, Levi M, Connors JM, Thachil J. Coagulopathy of Coronavirus Disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep. 48 (9):1358-
1364. [Medline]. [Full Text].
335. Katneni UK, Alexaki A, Hunt RC, Schiller T, DiCuccio M, Buehler PW, et al. Coagulopathy and Thrombosis as a Result of Severe
COVID-19 Infection: A Microvascular Focus. Thromb Haemost. 2020 Aug 24. [Medline]. [Full Text].
336. Ferguson J, Volk S, Vondracek T, Flanigan J, Chernaik A. Empiric therapeutic anticoagulation and mortality in critically ill patients
with respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
337. Paranjpe I, Fuster V, Lala A, Russak AJ, Glicksberg BS, Levin MA, et al. Association of Treatment Dose Anticoagulation With In-
Hospital Survival Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7. 76 (1):122-124. [Medline]. [Full Text].
338. Assessing Safety, Hospitalization and Efficacy of rNAPc2 in COVID-19 (ASPEN). [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Dec 15; Accessed: December 16, 2020.
339. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable
bat origin. Nature. 2020 Mar. 579 (7798):270-273. [Medline]. [Full Text].
[Link] 75/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
340. First Randomized Trial Reassures on ACEIs, ARBs in COVID-19. Medscape Medical News. 2020 Sep 01. Available at
[Link]
341. Lopes RD, Macedo AVS, de Barros E Silva PGM, Moll-Bernardes RJ, Feldman A, D'Andréa Saba Arruda G, et al. Continuing versus
suspending angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: Impact on adverse outcomes in
hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)--The BRACE CORONA Trial. Am Heart J.
2020 Aug. 226:49-59. [Medline]. [Full Text].
342. Clerkin KJ, Fried JA, Raikhelkar J, Sayer G, Griffin JM, Masoumi A, et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and
Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2020 Mar 21. [Medline].
343. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?
(correspondence). Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar 11. [Full Text].
344. Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, Gao H, Guo F, Guan B, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS
coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med. 2005 Aug. 11 (8):875-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
345. Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Solomon S. Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors in
Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 March 30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
346. Ishiyama Y, Gallagher PE, Averill DB, Tallant EA, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM. Upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 after
myocardial infarction by blockade of angiotensin II receptors. Hypertension. 2004 May. 43 (5):970-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
347. Ferrario CM, Jessup J, Chappell MC, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, Tallant EA, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition
and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation. 2005 May 24. 111 (20):2605-10.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
348. Klimas J, Olvedy M, Ochodnicka-Mackovicova K, Kruzliak P, Cacanyiova S, Kristek F, et al. Perinatally administered losartan
augments renal ACE2 expression but not cardiac or renal Mas receptor in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cell Mol Med. 2015
Aug. 19 (8):1965-74. [Medline]. [Full Text].
349. Walters TE, Kalman JM, Patel SK, Mearns M, Velkoska E, Burrell LM. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 activity and human atrial
fibrillation: increased plasma angiotensin converting enzyme 2 activity is associated with atrial fibrillation and more advanced left
atrial structural remodelling. Europace. 2017 Aug 1. 19 (8):1280-1287. [Medline]. [Full Text].
350. Burchill LJ, Velkoska E, Dean RG, Griggs K, Patel SK, Burrell LM. Combination renin-angiotensin system blockade and angiotensin-
converting enzyme 2 in experimental myocardial infarction: implications for future therapeutic directions. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012 Dec.
123 (11):649-58. [Medline].
351. Statement from the American Heart Association, the Heart Failure Society of America and the American College of Cardiology.
Patients taking ACE-i and ARBs who contract COVID-19 should continue treatment, unless otherwise advised by their physician.
American Heart Association. Available at [Link]
should-continue-treatment-unless-otherwise-advised-by-their-physician. 2020 Mar 17; Accessed: March 27, 2020.
352. Sama IE, Ravera A, Santema BT, van Goor H, Ter Maaten JM, Cleland JGF, et al. Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-
converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Eur Heart J. 2020
May 14. 41 (19):1810-1817. [Medline]. [Full Text].
353. University of Minnesota. Losartan for Patients With COVID-19 Not Requiring Hospitalization (NCT04311177). [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 Mar 17; Accessed:
March 27, 2020.
354. University of Minnesota. Losartan for Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization (NCT04312009). [Link].
Available at [Link] 2020 Mar 17; Accessed:
March 27, 2020.
355. Torres A, Blasi F, Dartois N, Akova M. Which individuals are at increased risk of pneumococcal disease and why? Impact of COPD,
asthma, smoking, diabetes, and/or chronic heart disease on community-acquired pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease.
Thorax. 2015 Oct. 70 (10):984-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
356. Drucker DJ. Coronavirus infections and type 2 diabetes-shared pathways with therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2020 Apr 15.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
357. Muniyappa R, Gubbi S. COVID-19 Pandemic, Corona Viruses, and Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Mar 31.
[Medline]. [Full Text].
358. DPP4 dipeptidyl peptidase 4. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Available at
[Link] 2020 Apr 20; Accessed: 2020 Apr 21.
359. FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine. US
Food and Drug Administration. 2020 Jun 15. Available at [Link]
19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chloroquine-and.
[Link] 76/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
360. NIH Media Advisory. NIH halts clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine. National Institutes of Health. 2020 Jun 20. Available at
[Link]
361. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel
coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020 Feb 4. [Medline].
362. Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, Cui C, Huang B, Niu P, et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of
Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis. 2020
Mar 9. [Medline].
363. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of
COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (2020)
(prepublication).
364. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb, Sevestre J, et al. Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin and COVID-19. Available at
[Link] 2020 Mar 30;
365. Molina JM, Delaugerre C, Goff JL, Mela-Lima B, Ponscarme D, Goldwirt L, et al. No Evidence of Rapid Antiviral Clearance or
Clinical Benefit with the Combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection. Med Mal
Infect. 2020 Mar 30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
366. Skipper CP, Pastick KA, Engen NW, Bangdiwala AS, Abassi M, Lofgren SM, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in Nonhospitalized Adults
With Early COVID-19: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jul 16. [Medline]. [Full Text].
367. NIH begins clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to treat COVID-19. National Institutes of Health. Available at
[Link] 2020 May
14;
368. A5395: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to
prevent hospitalization or death in persons with COVID-19. AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Available at
[Link] Accessed: 2020 May 15.
369. Abella, BS, Jolkovsky EL, Biney BT, and the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 With Hydroxychloroquine (PATCH)
Investigators. Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine vs placebo for pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis among health care
workers – A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Int Med. 2020 Sep 30. [Full Text].
370. Hydroxychloroquine Post Exposure Prophylaxis for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) NCT04318444. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Apr 27;
371. Hydroxychloroquine as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers (HCQPreP) NCT04363450. [Link]. Available at
[Link] 2020 Apr 29;
372. Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine (HERO-HCQ) NCT04334148. [Link]. 2020
May 14. Available at [Link]
373. Rajasingham R, Bangdiwala AS, Nicol MR, Skipper CP, Pastick KA, Axelrod ML, et al. Hydroxychloroquine as pre-exposure
prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
374. Boulware DR, Pullen MF, Bangdiwala AS, Pastick KA, Lofgren SM, Okafor EC, et al. A Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine as
Postexposure Prophylaxis for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 3. [Medline]. [Full Text].
375. Ray WA, Murray KT, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Stein CM. Azithromycin and the risk of cardiovascular death. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 17.
366 (20):1881-90. [Medline]. [Full Text].
376. Simpson TF, Kovacs RJ, Stecker EC. Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk Due to Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin Treatment For COVID-
19. American College of Cardiology; Cardiology Magazine. Available at [Link]
cardiology/articles/2020/03/27/14/00/ventricular-arrhythmia-risk-due-to-hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin-treatment-for-covid-19.
2020 Mar 29; Accessed: April 1, 2020.
377. [Guideline] Roden DM, Harrington RA, Poppas A, Russo AM. Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc in Exploratory COVID-19
(Coronavirus Disease 2019) Treatment. Circulation. 2020 Apr 8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
378. Borba M, de Almeida Val F, Sampaio VS, Alexandre MA, Melo GC, Brito M, et al. Chloroquine diphosphate in two different dosages
as adjunctive therapy of hospitalized patients with severe respiratory syndrome in the context of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)
infection: Preliminary safety results of a randomized, double-blinded, phase IIb clinical trial (CloroCovid-19 Study). MedRxiv. 2020
Apr 11. [Full Text].
379. Lane JCE, Weaver J, Kostka K, Duarte-Salles T, Abrahao MTF, Alghoul H, et al. Safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in
combination with azithromycin, in light of rapid wide-spread use for COVID-19: a multinational, network cohort and self-controlled
case series study. medRxiv. 2020 Apr 10. [Full Text].
[Link] 77/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
380. [Guideline] NIH. Potential Antiviral Drugs Under Evaluation for the treatment of COVID-19. COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines.
Available at [Link] 2020 Jun 11; Accessed: June 16, 2020.
381. RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Lopinavir-ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomized,
controlled, open-label, platform trial. The Lancet. 2020 Oct 05. [Full Text].
382. Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, et al. A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. N
Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 18. [Medline]. [Full Text].
383. Baden LR, Rubin EJ. Covid-19 - The Search for Effective Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 18. [Medline]. [Full Text].
384. Li Y, Xie Z, Lin W, Cai W, Wen C, Guan Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir or Arbidol in adult patients with
mild/moderate COVID-19: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Med (from Cell Press). 2020 Apr 17. [Full Text].
385. Hung IFN, Lung KC, Tso EYK, Liu R, Chung TWH, Chu MY, et al. Triple combination of interferon beta-1b, lopinavir–ritonavir, and
ribavirin in the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2020 May
08. [Full Text].
386. Momekov G, Momekova D. Ivermectin as a potential COVID-19 treatment from the pharmacokinetic point of view: antiviral levels are
not likely attainable with known dosing regimens. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2020. 2020. 34(1):469-74. [Full
Text].
387. Chaccour C, Hammann F, Ramón-García S, Rabinovich NR. Ivermectin and Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Keeping Rigor
in Times of Urgency. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Apr 16. [Medline]. [Full Text].
388. López-Medina E, López P, Hurtado IC, Dávalos DM, Ramirez O, Martínez E, et al. Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of
Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Mar 4. [Medline]. [Full Text].
389. ViralClear halts its phase 2 hospitalized COVID-19 trial. BioSig Technologies. 2020 Oct 26. Available at
[Link]
390. Update on CALAVI phase II trials for Calquence in patients hospitalized with respiratory symptoms of COVID-19. AstraZeneca. 2020
Nov 12. Available at [Link]
[Link].
391. Incyte Announces Results of Phase 3 RUXCOVID Study of Ruxolitinib (Jakafi) as a Treatment for Patients with COVID-19
Associated Cytokine Storm. Incyte Corp. 2020 Dec 14. [Full Text].
392. Lian N, Xie H, Lin S, Huang J, Zhao J, Lin Q. Umifenovir treatment is not associated with improved outcomes in patients with
coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jul. 26 (7):917-921. [Medline]. [Full Text].
393. [Guideline] Giudicessi JR, Noseworthy PA, Friedman PA, Ackerman MJ. Urgent guidance for navigating and circumventing the QTc
prolonging and torsadogenic potential of possible pharmacotherapies for COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Apr 07. [Full Text].
394. Mercuro NJ, Yen CF, Shim DJ, Maher TR, McCoy CM, Zimetbaum PJ, et al. Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of
Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1. [Medline]. [Full Text].
395. Chorin E, Dai M, Shulman E, Wadhwani L, et al. The QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Treated with
Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin. medRxiv. 2020 Apr 03. [Full Text].
396. FDA Combating COVID-19 with Medical Devices. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at
[Link] 2020 Jun 15; Accessed: June 19, 2020.
397. Zhang Q, et al. Cellular nanosponges inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Nano Lett. 2020 Jun 17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
398. [Guideline] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evaluating and Testing PUI.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at [Link] March
9, 2020; Accessed: March 18, 2020.
399. [Guideline] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens
from persons for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CDC. Available at [Link]
nCoV/lab/[Link]. 2020 Nov 05; Accessed: November 16, 2020.
400. [Guideline] Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Quality, Safety & Oversight Group. Guidance for Infection Control and
Prevention Concerning Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): FAQs and Considerations for Patient Triage, Placement and Hospital
Discharge. Available at [Link] March 4, 2020; Accessed: March 4, 2020.
401. Puopolo KM, Hudak ML, Kimberlin DW, Cummings J. Management of Infants Born to Mothers with COVID-19. American Academy
of Pediatrics. Available at [Link] April 2,
2020; Accessed: April 3, 2020.
[Link] 78/79
3/30/2021 [Link]
402. [Guideline] AAP. FAQs: Management of Infants Born to Mothers with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. American Academy of
Pediatrics. Available at [Link]
born-to-covid-19-mothers/. May 21, 2020; Accessed: May 27, 2020.
403. [Guideline] COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes
of Health. Available at [Link] 2021 Mar 05; Accessed: March 12, 2021.
404. [Guideline] Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan S, Carrier M, Collen JF, Doerschug K, et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of
venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2020 Jun 2. [Medline]. [Full
Text].
405. [Guideline] Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo M, Levi M, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and
management of coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 May. 18 (5):1023-1026. [Medline]. [Full Text].
406. [Guideline] COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with COVID-19. National Institutes of Health.
Available at [Link] 2020 May 12; Accessed: June 19, 2020.
[Link] 79/79