Criminal law Study pack
page 3
Contents
Subject guide
chapter
1 1 Textbook of criminal law Chapter 1: ‘Crime and the criminal law’, pp.36–41,
by Glanville Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2 2 Textbook of criminal law Chapter 3: ‘Intention’, pp.70–74, by Glanville Williams . . . 11
3 ‘Language barrier’ by Nigel Hanson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3 4 Extract from ‘Insanity, automatism, and the burden of proof on the accused’
by Timothy H. Jones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
5 Criminal law theory and doctrine, Chapter 4 ‘The actus reus’ pp.75–77
by Andrew Simester and Robert Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
6 Criminal law theory and doctrine, Chapter 4 ‘The actus reus’ pp.114–117
by Andrew Simester and Robert Sullivan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4 7 Lord Lane’s judgment in R v Stone; R v Dobinson [1977] QB 354, [1977]
2 All ER 341, [1977] 2 WLR 169, 64 Cr App R 186, 141 JP 354 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
8 European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . . . . . . . . 50
5 9 Textbook of criminal law Chapter 16: ‘Causation’, pp.381–382, by Glanville Williams . 52
10 ‘Criminal causation and the careless doctor’ byJohn E. Stannard . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6 11 Lord Bingham’s speech in R v G and another [2003] UKHL 50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
12 European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . . . . . . . . 72
13 Extract from Ackner LJ’s judgment in Attorney General’s reference
(No. 4 of 1980) [1981] 2 All ER 617 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
7 14 Extract from the judgment in R v Malcherek; R v Steel [1981] 2 All ER
422, 422 –429 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
15 Extracts from Re A (children) [2000] 4 All ER 961 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
16 Extract of the judgment from Lamb [1967] 2 All ER 1282 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
17 Extract from R v Misra; R v Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2375 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
18 Judgment from Powell & Daniels; English [1999] 1 AC 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
9 19 Extract from R v Ireland and Burstow [1998] AC 147 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
20 Extract from the Law Commission: Offences Against the Person Bill 1998 . . . . . . 96
21 ‘Should more matches end in court?’ by Simon Gardiner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
10 22 Extract from Crown Prosecution Service Guidance to Prosecutors . . . . . . . . . . 104
23 Extract from Judicial Studies Board Specimen Directions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
24 Extract from R v Savage; R v Parmenter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
11 25 Criminal law: texts and materials by C.M.V. Clarkson and H.M. Keating . . . . . . . . 139
26 Setting the boundaries: Reforming the law on sex offences . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
27 Protecting the public: Strengthening protection against sex offenders
and reforming the law on sexual offences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
28 ‘The Sexual Offences Act 2003: (1) Rape, Sexual Assaults and
the Problems of Consent’ by J. Temkin and A. Ashworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
14 29 Director of Public Prosecutions v Armstrong [2000] Crim LR 379 . . . . . . . . . . . 195
18 30 Lloyd [1992]: Case Comment by Professor J. C. Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
31 Criminal Damage Act 1971, Section 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
32 Extract from R v Steer [1987] 2 All ER 833 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
