Developments of technology are causing environmental problems.

Some people
think the solution is that everyone accepts a simpler life, while others believe that
technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

 A conclusion sentence from the two viewpoints of the question:

People have different views about resolution to reduce environmental

contamination in the growth of technological age.
Basic intro: While there are some strong arguments in favor of a notion that living
plain lives is considered as a reasonable remedy to cope with environmental
issues, I hold a firm conviction that technology plays a vital role in tackling these
problems.

 Pick one question from ielts essay app => write the introduction.
There are a couple of fundamental reasons why some reckon that living an
uncomplicated life relying less on technology could mitigate detrimental influence on the
environment. The first reason is that to make use of eco-friendly vehicles could make a
crucial contribution to protecting the environment , which significantly decreases an
amount of carbon dioxide emission discharged into the atmosphere . For instance,
people should opt to walk or ride as opposed to drive in order to reduce our reliance on
fossil fuels which are a main culprit of greenhouse effect and global warming. Another
reason is that diminishing their consumption of electricity helps lessen the demand of
utilizing natural resources which is exhausted. Take Earth Hour as a prime example,
everyone is asked to turn their lights off for sixty minutes and restrict to use electronic
facilities in order to create environmentally friendly lifestyle.

Chỉnh ít nhất 30%

For all afore-mentioned arguments, I still opine that development of technology is
a part and parcel of dealing with environmental problems. First of all, not only can
technology recycle materials such as paper and glass but it can handle most of non-
recyclable plastic waste crisis, which mitigates the problem of waste disposal.
Moreover, unlike conventional physical recycling, high-tech technology does not require
separation of plastic by type and color but it can recycle everything from milk cartons to
diving gear and even wood by-products. In addition, it can generate electricity from
alternative resources such as solar energy, wind and wave power, which encourages
people to make use of a renewable energy in order to create electricity without
significantly damaging the environment. Therefore, people will be able to halt the
overuse of electricity produced from non-renewable resources including coal and fuel.
Thay đổi 30%

To sum up, it can be concluded that even though I concur that living simpler lives
probably resolves environmental degradation, it seems to me that enhancement in
technology plays an imperative role in finding out possible solutions for this.

21. Some people think that only the best students should be rewarded. Others,
however, think that it is more important to reward students who show
improvements. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about compensating among students. While there are some
strong arguments in favor of a notion that only students achieving the highest level of
academic attainment deserve honors, I hold a firm conviction that those showing great
enhancements ought to be praised by rewarding them.
There are a couple of fundamental justifications why some reckon that accolade should
be given to students having excellent academic results. The first noticeable notion could
be that school appreciates their hard work with prizes. Not only could this inspire and
embolden students to show their enthusiasm towards studying for top-notch scores but
this could create a highly competitive studying environment at school. Hence, they more
often than not make their attempt to reach their highest aspirations like gaining a variety
of compliments and noble prizes. The second factor can be related to a fact that gifted
students being preeminent could be given opportunities to nurture their abilities. As a
consequence, school selects outstanding students among the best results for enrolling
in extra classes to intensify their capabilities so as to take them to national or even
international competitions.
For all afore-mentioned arguments, I still opine that school should reward and give
encouragement to those endeavouring to study and making great improvement in their
grades. First of all, this could give equal chances for every student to accomplish
awards, rather than only pay more attention to the topmost achievers. In lieu of feeling
depressed and disappointed when competing with their excellent classmates, basic or
even intermediate students constantly make significant progress and hit first-rate
academic targets for their effort during semesters, which would be acknowledged and
complimented. In addition, they would benefit from their improvement, which broadens
their knowledge, not just to achieve high scores. Without receiving rewards towards
their attempt, they would give up to get better grades and pressure, anxiety and
cheating would occur and increase during examinations.
To sum up, it can be concluded that even though I concur that top students received
priceless awards through excellent studying, it seems to me that students showing
improvement also need to be rewarded.
24. Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid
organizations draws the attention to problems, while others think celebrities
make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about a role of well-known people’s involvement in global
aid organizations. While there are some strong arguments in favor of a notion that their
participation may lessen a paramount importance of problems, I hold a firm conviction
that this trend could bring about enormous and positive changes to society.
There are a couple of fundamental justifications why some reckon that eminent people
are likely to make the problems become less crucial. The first reason could be that
many acknowledge that celebrities make a great contribution to assist international aid
organizations as a business strategy to boost their reputations rather than what
messages they want to convey. For instance, they organize more and more charitable
campaigns in order to appeal to communities to engage in supporting the
underprivileged situations to overcome difficulties in their life without any particular
passion or interest in those. In addition, using prominent people’s image promotes an
imperative role of international aid organizations, which may trivialize the serious their
work on the grounds that people have a preference for paying more attention to famous'
fame than their endeavor. Therefore, this might lead to the problems becoming less
vital.
For all afore-mentioned arguments, I still opine that celebrities can bring meaningful
changes to social activities. Firstly, they have a huge number of fans who are inspired
by their actions. For instance, Thuy Tien, a Vietnamese singer, enrolling in a project to
help local living in rock salt areas get over the toughest period, therefore, many millions
from individual to enterprises joined in this project by donating money and working as
volunteers thanks to her encouragement. Furthermore, celebrities are often trusted by
both local and international communities, which lead to raise people’s awareness of
global issues. As a result, more people worry about projects and devote money or
volunteer to take a practical action to tackle the problems.
To sum up, it can be concluded that although I concur there are some drawbacks to
celebrity participation in international aid organizations, it seems to me that it can benefit
a great deal for the community that they take part in voluntary activities.
33. Some people think that the amount of noise people make have to be
controlled strictly. Others say that people are free to make as much noise as they
wish. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different notions in terms of whether noise should be limited. While there
are some strong arguments in favor of a notion that they have the right to make noisy
sounds as they like, I hold a firm conviction that there should be stringent regulations to
manipulate the level of noise an individual can create.
There are a couple of fundamental justifications why some reckon that people have a
fundamental freedom to make as much noise as they want for a wide range of reasons.
The first reason could be that, not only could many feel more delightful but they could
unwind and alleviate stress when producing noises from recreational activities. For
instance, turning the volume louder and singing out loud to evoke a wide range of
emotional frameworks towards beloved songs makes them chill out and mitigate stress.
In addition, people acknowledge noises as an integral part of the industrialization and
modernization process; hence, traffic noise or engine noise seems to have become
more familiar to urban dwellers. As a result, they recognize that there are no particular
reasons to control noise.
For all afore-mentioned arguments, I still opine that people could benefit a great deal
from imposing some laws to rigorously dominate noises. First of fall, noise has
detrimental impacts on people‘s health. In effect, they cannot have a good night sleep
owing to blaring sounds from nearby industrial zones or late night parties. In addition, if
this case keeps going for a long time, it will definitely have perilous influence on their
mental and physical health such as getting obesity easily, causing psychological
disorder and heart-related diseases. Furthermore, noise deteriorates the productivity of
general population. As a result, they cannot fully concentrate on their tasks due to
consecutively intrusive sounds from vehicles in the street.
To sum up, it can be concluded that even though I concur that people have a freely
preference for making noises, it seems to me that noise should be severely enacted so
as to have a quality of life.
37. Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some
people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that
effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views
and give your opinion.
People have different views about what human activities have detrimental impact on
fauna and flora. While there are some strong arguments in favor of a notion that nothing
can be done to tackle wrong-doer human actions towards ecological system, I hold a
firm conviction that practical measures can be devised to bring about a positive change.
There are a couple of fundamental justifications why some reckon that the damaging
effect of individual activities on the wildlife cannot be resolved. The first noticeable effect
could be that extinction or near-extinction species cruelly murdered by poachers, which
is on the rise to serve meaningless people’s demand such as ivory, tiger bone glue or
fashionable products made by their skins and furs. On the grounds that, they are
expected that absorbing this panacea will significantly enhance their heath from
weakness to strength and dressing up genuine leather jacket will be admired by others
due to following the latest trend. In addition, deforestation tremendously raises to make
room for more living space, which is largely the consequence of the increasing
population. Therefore, many animals whose habitat is forest are put on the edge of
extinction due to habitat destruction.
For all afore-mentioned arguments, I still opine that governments and individuals
constantly take top prior action to halt negative effect that people’s activities have on our
planet. First of all, authorities could implement more severe punishments for any
harmful activities to forests, which is home for many animals on land. For instance,
stringent penalties or even prison sentence is applied for deforesting and hunting
behaviors so the life of many species will be conserved. Secondly, they should allocate
more money to upgrade pollution treatment system so as to clean sewage before
directly discharging it into rivers or oceans. Take Japan as a prime example, using high-
tech technology system purifies sewage from industrial zones and households to wipe
out toxic and polluted substance, which is an imperative part of protecting marine
ecosystem.
To sum up, it can be concluded that even though I concur that people are not
concerned about their activities having negative effect towards ecosystem, it seems to
me that people around the world must come together to address the issue in order to
preserve these species.