Automated Can Sealing for SMEs
Automated Can Sealing for SMEs
5 [Link]
Design and Construction of an Automated Adjustable-can foil Sealing Machine
6 [Link]
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-4, Issue-9, September 2017
More so, Roller shaft is driven by a motor, but Torque on Where T1 = Tension on tight side, T2 = Tension on slack side,
roller = Torque on Pulley (Law of transmissibility of forces) µ = Coefficient of friction on belt = 0.28
Thus, F x R = f x r (7) Substituting data into equation (12)
F = Force on Roller, f = Force on pulley, R = radius of roller, T1 = 25.77 T2 (13)
r = radius of pulley Also relationship between speed of motor and pulley diameter
f ~ 81.41 N N2/N1 = d1/d2 (14)
Thus to select a motor for the conveyor, then the torque Given; N1 = 195 rpm, d1 = 85mm, d2 = 120mm
generated by motor must be greater than torque on roller in N2 = = = = 138.125 rpm
order to drive it (Torque of roller < Torque from motor) [4],
[8]. And = 138 rpm
Therefore, from equation (7) Also, recall speed of motor in m/s
Torque of roller = F x R V= (15)
= 12.72 X 0.08 v= =
= 1.02 Nm
V = 0.87 m/s
Considering a motor of 1hp = 740w, 1440rpm.
More so, Power transmitted by belt
P = (T1 – T2) V , [4] (16)
Where T = Torque of motor in N-m (T1 –T2) V = 740
P = Power of motor in Watts T1 –T2 = = 850.57 N
N = Speed in rev/min, and π = 3.142
Therefore, T = 4.91 N-m T1 –T2 = 850.57 N (17)
Since T motor > T conveyor (4.91 > 1.02 N-m); then, a motor of Substituting equation (13) in equation (17)
1hp rating is selected to drive the conveyor [4]. 25.77 T2 – T2 = 850.57 N
2.2.3 Selecting the belt length for the motor /compressor T2 = = T2 = 34.34 N
link and motor/conveyor link From equation (13), T1 = 25.77 T2 = 884.94 N
Thus, tensions on V-belt are; T1 = 884.94 N and T2 =
For V-Belt Drives (Open Belt Drive)s 34.34 N
Length of open belt drive is as expressed in equation
(18), [4], [8]
L= (18)
L = (120 + 85) + 2(275) +
L = 873.16 mm 873 mm
From the standard pitch length table of V-belts according to
IS: 2493 – 1974, [4], [8]
We selected type-A belt of length 925 mm, since 873 mm is
not in standard table.
Thus the design and selection is safe.
Fig 2: Belt drive system
2.2.4 Design for the roller
From figure 3, Where; WH = Weight of Hollow shaft, W1 =
The Angle of contact; θ
Weight of Solid shaft 1, W2 = Weight of Solid shaft 2
θ = (180 - 2α) (8)
W3 = Weight of Roller = WH + W1 + W2 (19)
Where, Sin α = , [4], [8] (9)
Mass density of steel, PS = 7850 Kg/m3
= radius of roller pulley, = radius of motor pulley, x = V1 = Volume of Shaft 1 = π r2 l1 (20)
centre distance V1 = π X (0.0125)2 0.145 = 7.12 X 10-5 m3
Given that = = = 60mm = 0.06m
D2 = Roller pulley diameter, D1 = Motor pulley diameter, x =
275mm = 0.275m
= = = 42.5mm = 0.0425m
From equation (8) α = Sin-1 [( – )/x]
= Sin-1 ((0.06 – 0.0425)/0.275)
= Sin-1 0.0636 = 3.65o
Angle of contact:
θ = (180 - 2 α) x in radian, [4] (10)
= 172.7 (π/180)
Fig 3: Schematic diagram for roller A
= 3.015 radians; ~ 3 radians
Angle of groove 2β = 30, [4] (11)
Mass of solid shaft 1 = density Volume (21)
= 15
M1 = PV1
Thus, tension on belt can be calculated by
M1 = 7850 7.12 10-5 = 0.56 Kg
2.3 log (T1/T2) = µ. θ Cosec β, [4] (12)
7 [Link]
Design and Construction of an Automated Adjustable-can foil Sealing Machine
At equilibrium,
Total upward force = Total downward force, [5]
:. R1 + R2 = W
R1 + R2 = 42.08 N (29)
Taking moment about B1
Clockwise moment = Anti-clockwise moment
Fig 5: Free force actions W 175 = R2 350
8 [Link]
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-4, Issue-9, September 2017
R2 = r= = , and d = 0.025m
R2 = 21.04 N Therefore Average shear force τ aver
Taking moment about B2
R1 350 = 42.08 175
τ aver = 332.425 KN/m2
R1 = Maximum shear stress τ max
R1 = 21.04 N τ max = Kt τ aver [4], (34)
R1 + R2 = 21.04 + 21.04 = 42.08 N, thus, the design is safe Where Kt = Stress concentration factor
Ratio of maximum diameter to minimum diameter (D/d)
(35)
= = 6.4
Ratio of radius of fillet to minimum diameter
(r/d) (36)
= 0.04
Therefore, theoretical stress concentration factor (Kt) for
stepped shaft with radius (r) i.e. shoulder fillet is given in
Fig 9: free force diagram
Engineering Design text books [4],[8].
For = 6.4, = 0.04;
From Table value for Kt = 1.96 [4]
τ max = 1.96 X 332.425 KN/m2
From equation (34)
τ max = 651.55 KN/ m2 = 651.55 KPa
Shear modulus of rigidity for mild steel G;
G = 79.3 GPa [4]
Since < G i.e. 651.55 KPa < 79.3 GPa
Fig 10: Shear force diagram
The design for the shaft is safe [4], [8].
2.2.7 Shear stress due to bending
Bending moment analysis BM (N-mm)
For points between B1W = 21.04x (30) τ= (37)
Z= (38)
For points between B1B2 = 21.04 x – 42.08(x-175) 2
Where τ = Shear Stress (N/m ), T = Torque, (Nm), Z=
(31)
Area due to Bending moment (m3)
From eqn (30), @ x = 0, B1W = 0
From eqn (30), @ x = 175, B1W = 3682 N - mm Therefore, τ aver = T (39)
From eqn (31), @ x = 350, B1W = 0 τ aver = 1.02 . 32 ..
π (0.025) 3
τ aver = 664.85 KN/m2
Maximum shear stress τ max
τ max = Kb x τ aver (40)
From Engineering design tables, for Kb; stress concentration
factor due to bending at
= = 6.4, = = 0.04 is given as Kb = 2.75
τ max = 2.75 X 664.85 KN/m2 from equation (40)
τ max = 1828.34 KN/m2 = 1828.34 KPa
Since shear modulus of rigidity for mild steel G = 79.3 GPa
[4],[8]
τ max < G (1828.34 KPa < 79.3 GPa), The design for shaft is
Fig 11: Bending moment diagram safe.
9 [Link]
Design and Construction of an Automated Adjustable-can foil Sealing Machine
10 [Link]
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-4, Issue-9, September 2017
welding process after necessary machining operations on the turned and machined to produce the rollers on a lathe
various machine tools (such as lathe, grinding and milling machine. The rollers were subsequently mounted on the frame
machines). supported by the bearings at their required positions. The
required seating openings and positions where the various
2.2.11 Efficiency of the machine components and sub-assemblies were calculated and hence
The efficiency of the automated adjustable-can sealing installed. These include the conveyor belt {tensioned}, gear
machine can be calculated using motor, electric motor, compressor, air tank, electrical panel
Efficiency = 100% (46) and motors and measuring gauges. It must be noted that
before the conveyor belt was finally mounted and tensioned,
Power Input = Power of Compressor motor
the plywood of specified dimension was screwed on the top of
Compressor motor of 1.1 KW rating can supply a current, I =
the frame to support the weight of cans {jars}. Also, a mixture
0.063 Amps and Voltage, V = 220 Volts
of glue and saw dust was used to cover up minor gaps and was
P=IV (47)
smoothened with abrasive paper to obtain high surface finish.
P = 0.063 220 = 13.36 W
The pneumatic system and fabricated mountings were
Pressing force required; F = PA (48)
coupled with adjustable knobs on the side of the equipment
P = pressure required to exert force P = 3 bar = 3 X 10 5 N/m2
and well position for sealing action. The photocells were fixed
A = surface area of sealing head
in their required position to sense the presence of jars,
A = π r2 (49)
regulate the conveyor system and also alert the pressure
Given r = 0.02 m
control of unit respectively. A connection was made to the
A = π (0.02) 2 = 1.257 10-3 m2
thermocouple that will be used to plug into an external socket
Thus, from equation (48) to generate power. Connections were made with heat resistant
F = 3 105 1.257 10-3 wire to the cartridge heater, which is seated in the machined
F = 377.10 N sealing head. More so, air hose were connected from the air
Work done by can (Jar + oil content) on conveyor = weight of tank linked with the compressor via the solenoid air valve to
can Distance covered to sealing point the pneumatic cylinder to their inlet and exit ports
Wk = W D [5] (50) respectively. Its sealing unit can be adjusted and sealing head
Where Wk = Work done replaced to accommodate cans of varying height and lip
W = weight of can + content = 4.615Kg X (9.81) diameter respectively. The features of the equipment includes
D = Distance covered by can = 0.468 m (from design) ; (1) pneumatic cylinder (2) air hose for out stroke (3) air hose
Wk = 0.468 X 4.615 X 9.81 = 21.19 J for in stroke (4) adjustable frame (5) cylinder push road (6)
Power Output = sealing head (7) rail guide (8) adjustable knob (plastic) (9)
Pout = (51) conveyor belt (10) plywood (11) roller (12) pneumatic valve
(13) air hose to pneumatic valve (14) air compressor (15)
Pout = Ws/Ts frame {angle iron} (16)electric panel (17) compressor tank
Given that the sealing time = Ts = 2.8s link (18) air tank (19) motor stand (20) pressure switch (21)
Where, Ws = work done by sealing head temperature control unit (22) gear motor (23) belt drive (24)
Ws = pressing force distance between sealing head and pulley and (25) photocells. See fig 14 and 15 for the isomeric
Jar view and photograph of equipment respectively.
Ws = F D1 (52) 3.2 Principle of operation
Given F = 377.10 N, D1 = 0.08m (from design) The principle of operation of this equipment is automated and
Ws = 377.10 X 0.08 = 30.168 J very simple. Once the power supply is connected to the mains;
Recall equation (51), the switch is on which immediately triggers the motor
Pout = 30.168/2.8 = Pout = 10.77 Watts connected to the compressor. The compressor builds up
Hence efficiency of the machine (η) enough air to about 3 bar (3 X 105 N/m2) in the air tank,
η= which is being regulated by the pressure switches and sensed
by the photocells. Simultaneously, heat is been generated by
the heating element (cartridge heater) and is controlled by the
= (53) temperature controlling unit (TCU) to about 200 oC which is
Recall Pin = 13.86 W and Pout = 10.77 W enough to melt the foil on the lid of the plastic jar.
η = 10.77 / 13.86 = 0.777 X 100% When sufficient air is stored in the air tank, the photocells
η = 77.74 % alerts the air valve (solenoid valve) which allows air intake
η 78 % into the pneumatic cylinder via the exit port of the air tank.
Hence efficiency of the machine is 0.78 or 78 %. This Immediately, the compressor, builds sufficient air in the tank,
indicates that the machine is efficient. (78 %) the photocells trip off (de-activate) the compressor motor and
actuates the conveyor motor. The conveyor speed is regulated
by the gear motor (as designed), as the Jar content moves to
III. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION AND OPERATIONS sealing point. As the lid of Jar gets closed under sealing head
(pneumatic cylinder), the photocells sense the presence of the
Jar and stop the conveyor system via the gear motor
3.1 Description of Equipment and Sequence of
(aluminum foil is dropped on jar mouth) and actuates the
production
sealing head to exert the pressing force required for sealing
The metals {angular irons} were welded to construct the
(downward stroke), simultaneously.
structural frame, then the steel hollow pipe and bars were
11 [Link]
Design and Construction of an Automated Adjustable-can foil Sealing Machine
Once the sealing is completed in few seconds, the photocells This equipment has been tested after its design and
consequently alert the solenoid valve to open the exit port of construction, and it efficiency is 78 %, which can be favorably
pneumatic cylinder to withdraw the sealing head and at the compared with the imported types, which is about 90 %. It’s
same time reactivate the gear motor to move the conveyor far productive with respect to the locally fabricated type
system, thus, the jar moves and are subsequently packaged as (Manually operated).
cap-less Jar or caped before packaging. Hence, for effective and reliable sealing, purity retention,
3.3 Testing secure packaging, easy peel off, hermetic sealing and leak
1 litre Jar of dimensions (54×43×82mm) minimum proofing, this equipment will help local manufacturers
size; achieve foil sealing of their cans {jars}.
The cans were arranged on the conveyor belt of the guided by
the railing, with the can having dimensions of 54×43×82mm,
the machine can accommodate three cans on an operation to
sealing point. The adjustable sealing frame (about 609mm
height) is lowered such that the stroke of the pneumatic
cylinder to the lid of the container is about 800mm. as one can
passes the sealing point, another can is replaced subsequently.
5litres can of dimensions (233×106×314mm)
maximum size;
The Jars were arranged on the conveyor belt system of the
equipment guided by the railings. Owing to its dimensions,
two cans can be accommodated to the sealing point. The
adjustable sealing frame (about 609mm height) was increase
such that the pneumatic cylinder stroke to the lid of can is
about 800mm. thus, as one can passes the sealing point,
another can is added subsequently.
3.4 Observations
1. Irrespective of the dimensions of the cans, the process
is regulated by the photocells.
2. The pneumatic cylinder stroke is also constant;
800mm
3. The force required is also constant; about 377N
4. The minimum pressure developed by compressor is Fig 14: Isometric view of sealing machine
5
also constant; about 2.5bar or 2.5 N/m2
5. The time of sealing 2.8s and aluminium foil melts at
about 130o C
6. The Efficiency on each operation varies in can.
However, for weight of can from 3.3kg to 10kg and
can dimensions not exceeding
233 , the equipment will be 78
efficient.
7.
3.5 Cost evaluation
From market survey carried out, the automatic can sealing
machine imported into this country is sold at the rate of
#2,400,000 [6490USD] including customs charges. But from
the Bill of Engineering Measurement and Evaluation
[BEME], the amount was calculated to be approximately
#950,000; meaning that there is a saving of #1,450,000 or
60.42% cost saving of the imported one. If this equipment is
produced with mass production technique Fig 15: Photograph of sealing machine
(commercialization), we could be rest assured that the amount
will drastically reduce further.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The authors would like to thank Dr. S.O Osueke and Engr.
Nwaiwu C.F of Department of Mechanical Engineering
The automated adjustable-can foil sealing machine is Federal University of Technology Owerri, Engr. Nwokwu
indispensable in the production industries with applications E.U and Engr Anorue K.C for their technical contributions
such as food and beverages, bottled water and juice, dairy and the Management of Projects Development Institute
products, pharmaceuticals, chemical industries, edible oils, Enugu, Federal Ministry of Science and Technology, Nigeria,
lubricating oils, oil treatments etcetera. for making their workshop available for equipment design
and technical expertise; especially the MD/CEO, Engr. Dr. C.
12 [Link]
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-4, Issue-9, September 2017
N Agulanna and Director of Engineering Research
Development and Production, Engr. Dr. E. C Oriaku.
REFERENCES
[1] [Link]
[2] [Link] S500 /[Link]
[3] [Link]
[Link]
[4] R. S Khurmi and J. K Gupta (1979). Machine Design (Updated
Edition 2005), Eurasia Publishing House Ltd. Ram Nagar New Delhi.
[5] B.P Ferdinard and E. R Johnston (1987). Vector Mechanics For
Engineers. MeGraw hill Ryerson Limited, Singapore.
[6] R. K Rajput (2006). Heat and mass transfer (third edition). S. Chand
and company Ltd New Delhi.
[7] J. F Douglas, J. A Swaffied and J. M Gasiorek (1979). Fluid Mechanics.
Pearson Education Ltd. Patparganj Dehli.
[8] R. S Khurmi and J. K Gupta (1979). Theory of Machine (Updated
Edition 2005), Eurasia Publishing House Ltd. Ram Nagar New Delhi.
[9] P. C Sherma (1982). Production Engineering. S Chand & Company
Ltd, Ram Nagar New Delhi.
[10] W. A. J Chapman (1943). Workshop Technology. CBS Publishers
Dargagani, New Delhi
[11] A. McConkey (1993). Applied Thermodynamics For Engineering
Technologist (First Edition). Pearson Education Ltd, Patparganj Delhi.
[12] B.I Theraja and A. K Theraja (1959). Electrical Technology (first
edition). S Chand & Company Ltd, Ramnager, New Delhi.
[13] K. A Stroud and D. J Booth (2001). Engineering mathematics (fifth
edition). Palgrave Publishers ltd. New York.
[14] Alden, John D., Commander (USN Ret) (1979). The Fleet Submarine
in the U.S. Navy: A Design and Construction History. London: Arms
and Armour Press pp. 48,50,62–63,210. ISBN 0- 85368-203-8.
[15] C.P EcKman (1958). Automatic Process Control Systems. John
wiley, New York.
[16] G. J. Thaler and R. G Brown (1960). Analysis and Design of Feedback
Control Systems. (Second Edition). MeGraw hill, New York.
[16] Golden gates Chapter (1924). The Materials Information Society.
ASM International. [Link]
[17] Adizue U.L, Anorue K.C, Nwaiwu C.F and Nwokwu U.E. (2008)
Design and fabrication of an automated can foil sealing machine. [Link]
Project.
13 [Link]