Future of Super Hi-Rise Buildings
Future of Super Hi-Rise Buildings
v-
I
MODERN TEEl
CONSTRUCTION
Published by VOLUME XIII NUMBER 1/ FIRST QUARTER 1972
•
American Institute
of Steel Construction CONTENTS
101 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10017
The Future of the Super Hi-Rise Building 3
Less Steel Per Sq. Ft. 8
Addition for the Press 10
O"~ICE". Concrete-Filled Steel Columns for Multistory Construction 12
Gilbert M Dorland. President
Van W. Coddington, First Vice President
William R. Jackson,
Second Vice President
Robert P. StuPP. Treasurer 1972 PRIZE BRIDGE COMPETITION
John K. Edmonds. Entries are inrited for the Hth Annual Prize Bridge Compe-
Executive Vice President
tition to select tlie most beautiful steel bridges opened to traffic
Leslie H. Gillette.
ASSistant Executive Vice President during the calendar year 1971.
William W. Lanigan, The membas of the 1972 Prize Bridge Jury are:
Secretary and General Counsel
Gerard F. Fox, iU.ASCE Partner, Howard, Needles, Tam-
men & Be"gendoff, New York, N. Y.
Rol)er! M. Mai,.., F.ASC"· ProfessOl', Civil and Environ-
_OITORIAL STAFF
mental Engineering, Washington Unive"sity, St. Louis, •
Missouri
Daniel Farb, Director of Publications Rober! 8. Ridwrtl., F.ASCE President, DeLellw-Cathe,'
Mary Anne Donohue. Editor & Co., Chicago, Illil/ois
/o/m E. Wnne, F.A~(;J;· President-elect, American Soci-
ety of Ci,'il Engineers; Earl and Wright, San Francisco,
".QIONAL OFFIC.S
California
Atlanta. Georgia
Alan III. '·0"r/.ee8, III.ASCf; Former presidellt, Amaican
Birmingham, Alabama
Institute 01 Planner .• ; Alan M. l'00rhee8 & Associates,
Boston, Massachusetts Inc., McLeaJ!, Virginia
Chicago, Illinois Enl>'ies must be postmarked prior to May 27, 1.?72 and ad-
Cleveland, OhiO dressed to the A lL'Urds Committee. AmC1'ican Institute 01 Steel
Columbus. Ohio Construction,101 Park Are.we, New York, New York,10017.
Dallas, Texas
Denver, Colorado
1972 FELLOWSHIP AWARDS
Detroit, Michigan
Charlotte. North Carolina Four engineaing stue/ellts hal'e been awarded $9,000 'ellole-
Hartford, Connecticut ships in the 10th Annllal Fellowship A It'ards Program. The
Houston, Texas progmm is designed to encow'aoe e... pertise in the creative use
Los Angeles, California o"abricated strllcillml steel.
Memphis, Tennessee Ric" F. David.on New Me;rico State University
Milwaukee, WisconSin
Adam III. Gla.. Uniursity 01 Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Minneapolis. Minnesota
New York, New York Er" . ! 1I. /"'.0"', II/ Washington Vniversity-St. Louis
Oklahoma City. Oklahoma Slephe" JI". ) orlly University 01 Notre Dame
Omaha. Nebraska
Philadelphia. Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania OUR APOLOGIES
OJ! page 401 the 4th Q. , 1971 i8slle 01 MSC, the Architectllral
•
St. Louis, Missouri
San Francisco, California Awards 01 EJ'Cellence willllers !Cere alllloullced. l"n, '·~J·!ff 'llf.
Seattle. Washington the name 01 Vincent G. [(lillO and Pal'tllCl'S, Phil _ . . t
Syracuse, New York was omitted as olle 01 the architects 101' the Richmond ColiseulIl,
Washington, District of Columbia Richmond, Va.
•
EtHel TOWeR CHRYSLER BUILDING STANDARD Oil JOHN HANCOCK CEHTER EMPIRE STATE WORlD TRADE CENTER SEARS TOWER
PAitS NEW YORK CH ICAGO CHICAGO NEW YORK NEW YORK CHICAGO
984 feE T 1046 FEET 1136 feET 1127 FEET 1250 FEET 1350 FEET lASO FEEl
These days the record for the world's Unique Design Concept
• Future
ord 41 years, from 1889 until 1930
when New York's 1,252-ft high Empire
State Building was constructed . Sur-
mounted by its Zeppelin mooring mast
and TV antennae, that building held its
mitted the erection of current ultra high
buildings, including the upcoming Sears
Tower, a IIO-story steel structure which
wi II be the world's highest.
Ultra high office buildings are a re-
the
height of 1,350 ft. The new superskyscrapers have be-
It is estimated that the Trade Center come possible because of the develop-
will hold its world's record for the ment of revolutionary new steel struc-
Super
world's shortest time, probably three tural systems embodying economies in
years, when Chicago's Sears Tower design, and in the progressive lighten-
passes the 1,350 ft mark on its way to ing of the frame and components of a
its own new world's record of 1,450 ft, high structure.
more than a quarter of a mile high. The new structural systems, in turn,
Building
from 9 to 12 ft in height. imaginative use of conventional lighter
What has caused the sudden em- gage steels in floors and curtain walls,
phasis on ultra high buildings? Has and using the computer.
there been a technological break- Buildings as high as 150 stories may
through that's made the supersky- be expected in the next decade. Build-
scraper possible? How high can a i ngs of 100 stories wi II become more
Sear. T01()tr
A significant trend to more econom- Ibs of steel per sq ft, compared with 4. The increasing use of composite
ical use of steel in high rise construc- 42.2 Ibs for the Empire State Building. floor construction where steel beams
tion is well under way. Its symbol and a A 50·story building can be constructed act compositely with concrete slab. In
measure of efficient design and tech- with only 20 Ibs and an II -story struc- some cases the steel deck acts com-
nology has become the weight per ture with as few as 6.3 Ibs. positely with the concrete slab.
square foot of a steel-framed structure. The following table indicates the 5. The use of computers which (a)
The weight·per-foot figure is derived progress made in the reduction of speed up and refine analysis for deflec-
•
by dividing the total number of square weight per square foot since the 102- tion and stress and thus result in the
feet of gross floor space into the total story Empire State Building was con- more accurate and economical use of
weight of the steel in the frame of the structed in New York City in 1930. The steel, and (b) let engineers make alter·
building. tabulation can not reflect all conditions nate choices with speed and economy.
Weight per sq ft has become an im- and factors which influence the reduc-
6. The "details" which consist of the
portant kind of relative cost index be- tion in weight. However, eight major fac-
arduous, painstaking steps taken by en-
cause the weight of a frame is related tors have significantly contributed to
gineers in evaluating alternatives at
to its cost, even though it is frequently weight reduction and have helped to
each step of design, the total of which
impossible to compare either the cost make steel the most economic and com-
can produce substantial reductions in
or the weight of one structure with an- petitive construction material for high
the weight of a frame.
other because of many variables. Also, rise buildings, both office and residential.
site conditions and other factors can Here are the major factors identified 7. The gradual increases in allow-
sometimes make a relatively heavier as chiefly responsible for slimming down able stresses on the basis of continuing
frame more desirable. the weight of a steel structural frame: research, as indicated in the AISC 1969
The progressive reduction factor in Specification for the Design, Fabrica-
the weight per sq It is indicated in a 1. Dramatic and innovative design. tion & Erection of Structural Steel for
study made by the Steel Products News Buildings. The new AISC Specification
2. The use of high strength low alloy thus more accurately predicts the
Bureau which highlights the weight-re- steels which are up to 100 percent
ducing contributions of some of the na- strength of steel structures.
stronger than conventional structural
tion's foremost engineers and architects, steel for buildings. Quenched and tem- 8. A reduction in the weight of other
whose pace-se tting developments have pered steels used in high strength bolts construction materials has permitted
ranged from spect~cular design con - are even stronger. use of lighter steel frames. Lighter ex-
cepts to the use of eight major factors ternal and internal walls, lighter floors
which reduce weight. Many are less dra - 3. The use of welding for fastening. using cellular steel panels and light-
matic, some are innovative, others are Welding saves from 8 to 15 percent of weight aggregate, the lightening of
pedestrian, but the total of which is re- the steel required in a structure that is other components and reduction of floor
flected in substantial savings in steel riveted or bolted because it results in height all combine to reduce the dead-
•
structures ranging in height from 110 continuous construction, and it elimi- load a frame must carry. Elimination of
to 11 stories. nates or minimizes the angles and concrete fireproofing and the SUbstitu-
Today, a 100'story office building can plates which must be used when struc- tion of light sprayed",n material also
be constructed with no more than 29 tures are fastened with rivets or bolts. produce a big saving.
• Pounds of Steel
per Square foot
42.2
38.
Year
1930
1969
Gross Area
Million Square feet
2.75
2.2
Stories
102
60
Ht·Width
Ratio
9.3
5.7
Building .
Empire State
1st Nail. Bank
City
New York
Chicago
37(*) 1965 1.46 31 4.4 Civic Center Chicago
37. 1930 1.1 77 8.5 Chrysler New York
37. 1972 9. 110 6.9 World Trade Center New York
33. 1974 4.4 109 6.4 Sears, Roebuck Chicago
32.1 1961 2.8 59 6.1 Pam Am Bldg. New York
32. 1950 .9 42 7.5 UN Secretariat New York
30. 1971 3.1 64 6.3 U.S. Steel Corporation Pittsburgh
29.7 1968 2.8 100 7.9 John Hancock Center Chicago
29.5 1974 1.4 62 7.1 United California Bank Los Angeles
29.5 1962 1.77 50 3.5 277 Park (Over RR) New York
28. 1957 .85 42 5.1 Seagram Bldg. New Yorl<
27.2 1945 .625 32 4.4 Esso Bldg., Radio City New York
26.6 1950 .39 27 5.5 Sinclair Oil New York
26.5 1971 2. 54 5.1 One Liberty Plaza New York
26.5 1971 1.84 54 5.75 IBM Bldg. Chicago
26. 1969 .4 26 4. Alcoa Bldg. San francisco
26. 1971 2.4 51 6.5 McGraw·HIII New York
25.7 1951 .51 30 4.1 Alcoa Bldg . Pittsburgh
25.6 1960 .258 ZO 4.1 United Engineering Center New York
25. 1972 .6 40 4.1 1st Natl. Bank, Oregon Portland
.875 50 4.9 Seattle-ht Natl. Bank Seattle
•
24.5 1969
23. 1963 1.3 46 6.1 I. C. Penney Building New York
22.5 1967 .31 25 3.5 Connecticut Mutual Chicago
22. 1968 .37 30 5.1 Owens·Corning fiberglas Toledo
22. 1957 .46 26 3.1 Corning Glass New York
22. 1972 1.2 40 4.1 One Beacon Street Boston
22. 1956 1.7 42 5.5 Socony Mobil New York
21.6 1963 .231 13 1.67 IBM Bldg . Pittsburgh
21.3 1970 .206 30 4.1 Two first Natl. Plaza Chicago
21. 1970 .8B 42 4.1 Boston Co. Building Boston
20.3 1950 .64 25 4.2 Mutual Life Insurance Bldg. New York
20. 1960 1.92 43 3.1 1290 6th New York
20. 1968 1.8 50 4.1 Burlington House New York
19.1 1955 .44 33 4.1 641 Lex. Ave . New York
18.9 1967 .84 41 3.4 437 Madison New York
18.7 1958 1.10 38 2.3 80 Pine Street New York
17.9 1959 .69 22 4.5 Gateway Center Bldg. #4 Pittsburgh
17.9 1971 1.5 54 6.t lOS Center Minneapolis
16.8 1957 1.50 30 1.7 2 Broadway New York
16.7 1958 .15 8 1.2 Deering·Millikin New York
16. 1969 .5 29 3.1 77 Water Street New York
8.78 1970 .15 10 6.1 200 No. Glebe Road Arlington, Va.
6.5 1969 .148 17 3.1 Housing Project St. Paul
6.3 1966 .168 11 6.1 Stevenson Apts. Bladensburg, Md.
6.3 1971 .13 10 5.1 Low income Housing (HUD) Brockton, Mass.
•
and below ,rade. Number of stories are above crade.
·The 37-psf weight of the Chicalo Civic Center Illustrates the need to consider I number 01 variables In com parl;3
structures on the basis of their dille rent per-foot-welghts. The Civic Center rises to • height of 640 II yel Is only
stories high and has 87-ft spans due 10 architectural requ irements and variations In the size and loc.Uon of the mlny
court rooms in the structure .
--
.
--
Berkeley, California
General Contractor:
Rai se r Construction Com pany
San Mateo, California
-•
'0
u '-
..
I;c• I
•
10
o 20 ft
MODERN STEEL CONSTRUCTION
•
The new Press Box for Memorial Sta- west rim of the stadium, using a mini- Two tiers accommodate the working
dium, at the University of California, mum of the existing seat space, and press, radio and television coverage,
Berkeley, replaces a smaller wood frame avoiding any visual blind spots. coaching staffs, statisticians, and VIP's.
structure, built in 1923, which was sup- The planning of the Press Box is Along the back of both tiers are the
ported on the reinforced concrete struc- based on obtaining clear visual sight supporting functions, snack bar, toilets,
ture of the stadium_ Since the stadium lines. The metal-framed plexiglas win - storage, film changing room, and the
is built over a major earthquake fault, dow panels are constructed in such a like. An elevator connects with the
it was felt that a new and larger struc- manner as to swing up and out, thus ground level entry, 90 It below.
ture would have to be structurally inde- eliminating posts and mullions from The use of steel is based on several
pendent In addition, the University view. The transparency of the front face factors. Of primary importance is the
preferred a scheme that would only is further expressed by the use of structure of the Press Box itself. I n-
eliminate a minimum number of spec- bronze-tinted plexiglas spandrels, re- stallation, accessibility, the need for
tator seats_ vealing both the floor line and structure. long spans, and the necessity of a rela-
The solution to the problem was, The siding material is made of fac- tively lightweight material were prime
therefore, a steel and plexiglas sheathed tory-finished corrugated steel , which considerations in choosing steel as the
steel frame structure, cantilevered on spans from floor to floor. Its "skinlike" building material.
•
huge wide-flange steel columns, which character is visually expressed by re- Aesthetically speaking, the character
are embedded in a new concrete foot- vealing thin edges, wrapping around the of steel and glass were employed to con-
ing system_ This new structure, 24 ft back corners and ending with sharp trast with the existing stadium in both
wide x 180 ft long, hovers above the edges at the front corners. form and texture.
by Alexander G. Tarics
•
•
-
The ('ollnml. i".idc 0/ the Bhadtd area
participatr in lateral load resistance.
• TheBe aTC inl(,Tconnecteci with 6 It deep
girders. The lat(,Tal load re.iBtillg framc
closely upproximatc. the shape 0/ a canti- BUILDING ELEVATION
[('vcr 0/ equal 8tre8'.
The colum"s outsicie' of the shaded arca
carry 1..'crtiealloatl oJlly, alld are illtercon-
"feted 1dth shallow girciers uncler the
floor slab. Herr the floors cantilever out-
side the lillc 0/ caltom'l', adding 80,000
sq It 0/ usable arca fa the building.
1,5 ' . / -
10 ' · 1-
I
,
2
connections
The conventional high rise steel
structure is composed of an assembly
•
!I c r 0 of columns and girders. Where columns
I
U .. and girders meet, stresses are the high-
est, yet this is the point where the
.;. • ,
8
girders are spliced for the necessary
:. I~ continuity. The cost of the preparation
I L ;.,
of the connections in the shop and the
, cost of the field work associated with it
':-
••,
.•, are significant components of the total
cost of the structural steel. A typical
"
I •. ~.
.. 50-story building may have thousands
,
.
\
- ..
of such connections .
The use of large tubular concrete-
, I ] filled columns simplifies the construc-
tion, because it permits columns and
girders to go through at their point of
. I '"
3
•s , intersection without interruption. The
concrete in the pipe columns prevents
,-~
6
1 the buckling of the web of the girder
1'-'
.
'-- '0 - .
from the usual high shear stresses in-
side of the connection. The girders
•
"pierce" the columns and only the web
[ 1 .1f11 of the girder is connected to flanges of
the steel columns in the most simple
I c J I 1- 0 manner. Girders are spliced where
stresses are lowest, specifically, in be-
FRAMING ELEVATION @ EXTERIOR WAll tween columns. The number of highly
A-A o
l..JL--.J
1 3 6
stressed connections under lateral load
can be also reduced to almost half byex-
LEGEND cluding certain columns from the lateral
load resisting frame.
mech. duct (optionol) .. column connection
2 cantilevered floor 5 ,t. . 1 pipe - cone. rill Fireproofing
3 girder connection 6 g irder
The fire resistance of building ele·
ments is determined through standard
fire test procedures adopted by appro·
priate agencies. It is expected that dur-
Si desway for all steels. Consequently, when these ing fire tests these columns would ex-
steels are used in a high rise structure, hibitgood fire resisting qualities-similar
In the design of steel framed high the higher working stresses under lat- to partially water·filled columns - be-
rise buildings, the control of sidesway eral loads are accompanied with high cause of large amounts of water of crys-
under lateral wind and earthquake strains and with increased sides)"ay. tallization in the mass of concrete in-
forces represents a major problem. With This does not exclude, but puts a limit side the steel pipe. Until such tests
conventional structural systems it is to, the broad utilization of high strength are performed on these proposed col-
customary to use more steel than re- steels in multistory construction. umns, they can be fireproofed as con-
quired for strength alone to keep the The st,ffness of the proposed con- ventional steel columns.
sidesway below acceptable levels. crete-filled tubular columns is so many The round shape and uniform diam-
There are several commercially avail- times more than the stiffness of the eter make it practical to consider the
able steels which have significantly equivalent weight wide flange columns, use of simple prefabricated fireproofing.
•
higher yield point than the commonly that less steel and higher strength steel Those columns which do not participate
used A36 steel. The modulus of elastic- can be used in the buildings without in lateral load resistance and conse-
ity, however, does not increase with the excessive sidesway. The saving in steel quently have simple connection details
higher yield point; it remains the same alone offsets the extra cost of concrete. can also have shop applied fireproofing.
•
ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL
•
18 put into place, Field CQllll('C-
tion. eompleted .
•
DAN8URY, CONN
PERMIT NO 97