Scribd
Upload
65 views1 page

Torts and Damages Dec 2

This document outlines the law on torts and damages in the Philippines. It discusses Articles 2176 to 2194 of the Civil Code, which cover liability of tortfeasors. It also discusses Article 2180 and the doctrine of vicarious liability, including vicarious liability of parents, guardians, employers, vehicle owners, the state, teachers and heads of establishments. The document provides 21 case references related to tort law and vicarious liability.

Uploaded by

Ria Gabs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
65 views1 page

Torts and Damages Dec 2

This document outlines the law on torts and damages in the Philippines. It discusses Articles 2176 to 2194 of the Civil Code, which cover liability of tortfeasors. It also discusses Article 2180 and the doctrine of vicarious liability, including vicarious liability of parents, guardians, employers, vehicle owners, the state, teachers and heads of establishments. The document provides 21 case references related to tort law and vicarious liability.

Uploaded by

Ria Gabs
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

TORTS AND DAMAGES

Assignment for December 2, 2020


1) Articles 2176 to 2194 of the Civil Code
2) Liability of Tortfeasors
3) Art. 2180 of the Civil Code
4) Doctrine of Vicarious Liability
a) Vicarious Liability of Parents
b) Vicarious Liability of Guardians
c) Vicarious Liability of Employers
d) Vicarious Liability of Owner of Vehicle
e) Vicarious Liability of State
f) Vicarious Liability of Teachers and Heads of Establishments of Arts and Trade
g) Proprietor of Building or Structure
Cases:
1) Ngo Sin Sing vs. Li Seng Giap & Sons, Inc., G.R. No. 1270596, November 28, 2008
2) Cangco vs. Manila Railroad Co., 38 Phil. 768
3) Metro Manila Transit Corporation vs. CA, G.R. No. 104408, June 21, 1993
4) Cerezo vs. Tuazon. G.R. No. 141538, March 23, 2004
5) Valenzuela vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 115024 and 117944, February 7, 1996
6) Tamargo, et al. vs. CA, G.R. No. 85044, June 3, 1992
7) Libi, et al., vs. IAC, G.R. No. 70890, September 18, 1992
8) Castilex Industrial Corporation vs. Vasquez, et al., G.R. No. No. 132266, December 21, 1999
9) Martin vs. CA, 205 SCRA 591
10) Maranan vs. Perez, et al., G.R. No. L-22272, June 26, 1967
11) Marchan vs. Mendoza, et al., G.R. No. L-24471, August 30, 1968
12) Baliwag Transit vs. CA, G.R. No. 116110, May 15, 1996
13) Victory Liner vs. Heirs of Malecdan, G.R. No. 154278, December 27, 2002
14) Francis High School vs. CA, 194 SCRA 341
15) Filamer Christian Institute vs. IAC, 212 SCRA 637; G.R. No. 75112, August 17, 1992
16) Baliwag Transit vs. CA, et al., G.R. No. 116624, September 20, 1996
17) Poblete vs. Fabros, G.R. No. L-29803, September 14, 1979
18) Pantranco North Express, Inc. vs. Baesa, G.R. Nos. 79050-51, November 14, 1989
19) Yambao vs. Zuniga, et al., G.R. No. 146173, December 11, 2003
20) Philippine Hawk Corporation vs. Lee, G.R. No. 166869, February 16, 2010
21) Syki vs. Begasa, G.R. No. 149149, October 23, 2003

(SAME REFERENCES)

ATTY. JETHRO M. PALAYON

You might also like