CAS Journal May 2003 - Vol4 N7 Series2
CAS Journal May 2003 - Vol4 N7 Series2
In This Issue:
The problem of investigating string instruments is a lot kke the famous story about a group of inquisitive but vision-impaired
men who
attempt to describe an elephant for the first time. They approached the giant beast with outstretched hands to find out its nature. The one
feekng the elephant's side said "a wak," the one feekng the elephant's leg said "a tree trunk," the one feekng the elephant's tail said, "a
rope," and so on. Each bekeved he was the only one who spoke the truth.
The story could just as weU describe a group of able CAS members who are set loose to figure out how stringed instruments work.
One
determined density and elastic modulus of tonewood samples, while another measured frequencies of free plates on a shaker table,
another concentrated on effects of surface coatings on damping, and others painstakingly measured arching curves and thickness graduations.
Each bekeved they had found the truth, and they ak experienced a sense of puzzlement when it became clear that others had different
ideas.
If we were to provide a solution to the original story, we could envision a keen observer sitting up in a
tree with a spyglass, who, viewing
ak parts of the elephant, saw the whole beast clearly and accurately. Only this observer had the perspective necessary to appreciate the
detaks offered in each of the men's descriptions.
In this issue, readers are invited to poksh their spyglasses, whke a series of selected authors describe many aspects of historic
instruments.
We selected a series of articles on such things as how classic historic instruments are shaped, the nature of their accessories, and at what
frequencies they buzz when a small glass tube touching their surface is briskly rubbed. These articles represent solid, reproducible
research on some of the world's most esteemed instruments, especiaky Cremonese viokns, violas, and cekos. The value they
represent
for makers and researchers is that they describe a considerably different "animal" than what has been described in the usual viokn making
mythology. Readers are invited to put the whole story together for themselves.
In addition to articles about historic instruments, we acknowledge Joan Maker's years of dedication to CAS, we learn the results of
the
recent readers' survey, Knut Guettler shares insights into bowing gestures and describes ISMA '02 Mexico City, and two technical notes
investigate the subject of tap tones. We hope you enjoy and take something rewarding from this issue.
Good Reading!
Jeffrey S. Loen
The CAS Journal is published twice a year by the Catgut Acoustical Society, Inc. a non-profit organization which aims to
increase and diffuse knowledge of musical acoustics and to promote the construction of fine stringed instruments.
The annual fee for membership in the Catgut For membership and back-issues contact the CAS
Acoustical Society is: Office:
The Catgut Acoustical Society is known for fostering pioneer research in musical acoustics and the appkcation of these principles to the
making of fine stringed instruments. To fulfill its mission, the Society supports publications, meetings for researchers and makers,
musical compositions, lectures, and concerts.
Authors 2
EDITOR Award
Jeffrey S. Loen Distinguished Service Award given to Dr. Joan E. Miker 4
[email protected]
Letters to Editor
ASSOCIATE EDITORS Sound Power of Mezzo Violin, by Carleen M. Hutchins 4
Gregg Alf Reconstruction of a King's Lyre, by Lloyd Craighill 4
[email protected] Reflections on Making a 21st Century Rebec, by Lloyd Craighill 5
Virginia Benade Comment and Response: Drawing Body Outknes 7
[email protected] Al-Bl Question, by Thomas Cox : 7
va V
Additional References on Modal Analysis, by David Bell 7
[email protected]
Results of CAS J Readers ' SutV^ 8
Bob Schumacher
[email protected] From the Contributing Editors
Look at the String Player's Bowing Gestures, by Knut Guettler 12
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS _ A, Closer
. ,__
Technical Notes
Charles Besnainou
George Bissinger Wood Testing by Tap-Tone by Thomas M. Cox 17
Xavier Boutillon Tap Tones of Old Itakan Top Plates by Jeffrey S. Loen 20
„ .
loseph Curtin
Knut Guettler
Feature: Historic Instruments
oo
Martin Schleske Measurements of Principal Resonance Modes of Historic Instruments, by A. Thomas King..23
Jim Woodhouse Reverse Graduation in Fine Cremonese Violins, by Jeffrey S. Loen 27
Documentation of a 1604 Violin by Hieronymus Amati, Italy, by Jeffrey S. Loen
PRODUCTION MANAGER
and A Thomas Kin& 40
Deana Campion
[email protected] Early Tuning Pegs and Tailpieces, by Eric Meyer 42
Curtate Cycloid Arching in Golden Age Cremonese Violin Family Instruments,
EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD .
by
.n/ .
(Juentin rlaytair
j x. jj
4o
t"Q
A. Thomas King
loseph Regh Working Methods of Early Classical Viokn Makers, as Impked by the Results of Recent
Okver E. Rodgers Dendrochronological Studies, by John Topham 59
Fan-Chia Tao __«
„««"__
Research Briefs oo
Meetings and Exhibits 70
Impressions From ISMA '02 — Mexico City, December 9-13, 2002, by Knut Guettler 72
CAS Journal (ISSN 0882-2212) is pubkshed semi-annuaky by the Catgut Acoustical Society, Inc., 55 Park Street, Montclair, New Jersey
07042. Neither the Society nor the Journal's editorial staff is responsible for facts and opinions expressed in articles or other materials
contained in the Journal.
Copyright 2003
Thomas M. Cox is a retired aerospace engineer. He is an amateur viokn maker, vioknist, and bassist.
Knut Guettler (born 1943 in Oslo, Norway) is a former principal double bassist of the Oslo Philharmonic. He has performed as soloist
and lecturer in U.S.A, Japan and a number of European countries. He is author of "A Guide to Advanced Modern Double Bass
Technique" (Yorke Edition, London). Presently, KG. devotes most of his time to research on the bowed string, often through the use of
computer simulations.
A. Thomas King is a vioknmaker in Potomac, Maryland. He is a past president of CAS and past editor of the CAS Journal.
Jeff Loen is a Seattle scientist/luthier who edits the CAS Journal.
Eric Meyer, BA, Univ. Of Notre Dame 1970. Apprenticed 1973-77 with luthier Jeffrey Elliot. Owner/ operator Twelfth Fret Guitar Shop
1978-86, restored, repaired and built plucked stringed instruments. Built five 18th-century French Baroque guitars with guidance of
lutemaker and historian Robert Lundberg. Machinist and set builder for Will Vinton Animation Studios 1987-89. Presently owner/
operator of Finetuning, making pegs and tailpieces for stringed instruments. http://www.vanzandtviokns.com/FineTuning.htm
Quentin Playfair has been working with bowed instruments since the early 70's, initiaky in the U.K., and then in Toronto. For the last
15 years he has been working on his own, deakng mainly with professional musicians from Ontario and northern N.Y. state. A growing
interest in baroque performance and instruments is reinforced by his continued fascination with History, his degree subject.
John Topham is a viokn maker and restorer who studied at the Staatkche Fachschule fur Geigenbau in Mittenwald, Germany. After
working in London for nearly ten years, he began working on his own and has been restoring instruments ever since. About eight years
ago, after gaining a degree at the Open University in the UK, he began investigating the technique of dendrochronology appked to the
viokn and, in association with a cokeague, Dr. Derek McCormick of Queen's University, Belfast, pubkshed two papers on Engksh and
Itakan instruments in the Journal of Archaeological Science.
MMMMMMM . ., ..
M M M
M^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^M^^^MMMMMMMMMMW________i
Joan E. Miller
CAS Distinguished Service Award
I am very pleased to announce that the Catgut Acoustical Society has presented a Distinguished Service Award to Dr. Joan E. Miker. The
presentation was made during the Awards Dinner of the November 2002 VSA (Viokn Society of America) Convention, at which time the
VSA also presented her with a Distinguished Service Award for contributions to their organization. Joan has been very active in both CAS
and VSA, so the awards are wek deserved.
Joan is a past-President and Board member of CAS. In addition to serving in these roles, Joan took a very active part in supporting the day-
to-day operations. It was clear that Joan accepted substantial, time-consuming jobsthat others hesitated take on.
to the first
Joan brought
computers into the CAS Office, trained the staff, and continues to provide support. She set up the database for membership records (along
with design of forms and reports), wek
as as the financial management and reporting software. Further, she took charge of the materials
for the CAS Library at Stanford, gathering materials from Montclair, then cataloging the entire collection. Any of these tasks, alone,
deserve our thanks.
Many of you may know that Joan, a retired Bek Labs employee, runs JEM Software, which produces the SAND software for the spectral
analysis of viokns. Her work for CAS, however, is often done in the background, and she makes a great effort to help the Society run
smoothly. We are pleased for the opportunity to thank and congratulate Joan for her contributions.
Jukus J. VandeKopple
President, CAS
Carleen M Hutchins
In their excekent study, Wang and Burroughs [I], state, "the mezzo Burroughs in the low mezzo range transmitted to the sound heard
violin does not appear to radiate more acoustic power than the from the wholeinstrument?" I hope that some aspiring researcher
standard instruments." However, listening tests of mezzo violins wik take on this challenge.
as well as 40 years of player experience indicate that the 30 or so
mezzos now being played are perceived to be louder than average References
normal good violins. [1] Wang, L.M., and Burroughs, C.8., 2002, Comparison of
radiated power from structurally different violins: Catgut
Perceived sound is measured in phons on the Fletcher-Munson Acoust. Soc. Journal vol. 4, no. 6 (Series II), p. 65-72.
curve (see [2] p. 1-7), which shows the way the average human ear [2] Berendt, R.D., Corliss, E.L.R., and Ojalvo, M.S., 1976,
weights sounds of equal levels but differentfrequencies, being more "Quieting: A practical guide to noise control": National
sensitive in the mid-range and faking off at either end. This means Bureau of Standards Handbook no. 119, US Environmental
that the human ear perceives an increase of 2-3 dB in the low G- Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control,
string range as twice the loudness in phons. The big question is Washington, DC 20460, 115 p.
"How is the extra 10 dB sound power as measured by Wang and
Lloyd Craighill
11 Cranberry Lane
Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 USA
Lloyd Craighill
11 Cranberry Lane
Amherst, Massachusetts 01002 USA
I have some thoughts about the extremely varied group of edges at the widest part of the plate, because there would be no
instruments known to musicologists as the "rebec" that appeared liners and sturdiness was a major objective. The walls had been
in Europe, perhaps as early as the tenth century. Webster's Cokegiate ground to about 7 mm except at the bottom where 10 mm was used
kmits its definition to "an ancient bowed usuaky 3-stringed musical because of end grain concerns. A very kght bass bar was glued in,
instrument with a pear-shaped body and slender neck." located to run under the bass foot of the bridge and converging a
kttle towards the centerkne, viokn fashion. Later a sound post was
My experiences are of a practical nature. I wanted to make a sturdy set. The late rebecs might have had one or both of these features
bowed instrument that could be played cello-style but that would and the medieval fiddle was clearly moving in this direction, but
be small enough to take car camping. The Arabic rabab and its history (in my project in any case) was clearly giving way to
multiform European cousins provided a model, but clearly my practicality. I concocted a scimitar and bird head soundhole
instrument was to be a 21st Century one and not a repkcation of —
pattern much more interesting than the back-to-back dumb-bunny
something that might have existed in the 15th Century. Thus, I C-holes of latter day gamba makers.
don't have the materials for a proper research paper, and instead
provide an account of a small extension of the historical process —
The bridge in this case, a smak abandoned ceko bridge with new
that began with the invention of the horsehair fiddle bow, probably —
feet glued on, and othermodifications wouldhave to be high enough
somewhere in central Asia and perhaps in the first mikenium B.C. for the bow to clear the boat-shaped body. My underlying modulus
was based on tenor viokn making. A roughly 600 mm string length
REFLECTIONS ON MAKING A 21ST CENTURY REBEC design could use existing cello strings and cello fingering. I
Visions of the medievalrebec had danced through my head for personally would not be able to manage the smaker placed-on-the-
years, and the time to bukd a reconstruction came in the summer of forearm instrument of northern Europe of, say, the 16th Century.
.
2001 I got a chance to be a paying guest on a 38-foot sloop about to With bridge kept as low as possible while considering bowing
cruise Maine's Casco Bay, and the skipper was, among other clearances, the fingerboard (3/4 ceko size) would still need a very
accompkshments, a professional musical entertainer. He suggested fat wedge, unless it were propped up with a couple of smak blocks —
bringing an instrument that could be stowed on board. the birth of the A-frame, or "peek-a-boo" neck assembly.
The boat was leaving in three weeks, so my project had to be done The best angle to and over the bridge could be replicated from
fast. What should the design be? The latest Grove's dictionary [1] cekos or tenors, and clearly a saddle at the bottom of the resonator
provides endless possibilities: a decorated body of Javanese —
would provide intolerable compression of the bridge so how about
hardwoodwith a stretched sound table ofbuffalo-bladderparchment a hitching post? Better, support it with a smak block at the bottom
... I had a log of maple that could produce a three-foot wooden of the resonator to counter the bending moment from the tak gut.
spoon, but that wouldbe a bitch to carve into a big, spoon-shaped
rebec. At the lumberyard I found a ten-foot plank of maple miked The bottom end was shaping up, but what about the head? My neck
smooth to 20 mm. I cut it into three pieces, and bandsawed them lamination plan had included a peg-board at the top, but pegs stuck
into two tennisrackets and a canoe paddle, the paddle blade thinned into the top of a guitar-kke head did not hold modern string tension.
to about 5 mm except at the edges. Laminated, they became the big Rebecs in later times had gone to the sickle-shaped pegbox and I
spoon I was after, easily drum-sanded into clean surfaces. The had better go to the pegbox myself. (By now, the boat was about due
upper half was a 60 mm wak that was turned into a fiddle neck by to leave port, and I wasn't done because of my backing, fiking, and
two long slightly converging saw cuts, producing about 28 mm head scratching). I stuffed a tenor into a sea bag and the skipper
thickness at the bottom and about 20 mm near the head, with the verykindly found a way to lash it under the foredeck next to his
resulting handlerounded to resemble a very fat viola neck, the slant guitar.
to the head being about 5 degrees from horizontal.
On return and with a kttle more time for my project I carved a lady-
The table was glued up from red spruce wedges, sawed out and skpper pegbox with a figurehead scrok based on a marble portrait
skghtly arched with a graduation of 3.5 mm around the bridge, a bit bust of a Roman matron in the Smith Cokege Museum collection.
thinner north and south of that, but thickeningto about 7 mm at the A bit of class for my poor-man's campfire-oriented three-stringed
ceko. The head had an extension below the pegbox that was scarf- viola, I would say. The timbreis out of our world—East of the viola
joined to the upper end of the neck. and West of the Chinese erhu—maybe somewhere in the Seljuk or
Ottoman Empire, perhaps on the Black Sea shores where woods
I finished the instrument with egg white sealer and oil varnish dried were plentiful, and skin heads not needed. It sings wek with a kght
under a plant-growing fluorescent light fixture, and strung it up ceko bow, but a palm-up gamba bow played with some wrist-snap
with leftover Super Sensitive tenor strings. A, D, and G worked comes closer to the soul of the instrument—cross your ankles, set it
well, and the little resonator, no bigger than a small dishpan, between your knees and set the (optional) neck clamp against the
supported the G as fully as it did the D and A (an E, D, A alternative middle of your chest for firm fingering. Strung with gut I am sure
did not go as wek, and experiments with four strings were quickly this instrument could be played in pubkc by the early music people
abandoned). without visible embarrassment. However, is it a rebec?
This product of the Tight-Bond age of lamination needs no mold, Look at the incredible multiplicity and diversity of often home-
corner and end blocks, bent ribs and bent liners, carved back or made rababs, rabobs, ribabs, rababas, etc. that extended across the
neck mortise. An efficient fiddlemaker with plans in hand could Muslim world, and their transformation in half-literate Europe in
knock it off in a week, maybe less. However, how well does it the tenth or eleventh century, resulting in the rebec, rebet, ribeca,
work? The sides are too thick to radiate useful sound but the bottom rabe, rebesbe, ribiblc.and you can see that this workshop
does work as a tympanum or wooden drumhead, and showed a experiment is not without cousins or precedent. It's just one more
clean circle mode on the shaker table. The top showed a clean adaptation.
circle mode too, but not much else and the nodal knes ran off the
confines of the plates, top and bottom. REFERENCE
[1] Remant, M., 2001, "Rebec", The New Grove Dictionary of
The assembled instrument has surprising acoustical efficiency with Music and Musicians, London.
—
the wound steel-core strings I am using as much noise as a cheap
read the "CAD Notebook" series of articles by Dana Bourgeois in "American Lutherie"(issues 65 to 71), and my own article [2].
References
[1] French, M., 2002, Instrument body descriptions using polar coordinates: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 8-10.
[2] Golber, D., 2002, The right CAD curve: Beziers, not spknes, are truly smooth: American Lutherie, no. 72, Winter, 2002, p. 50-53.
[1] Schekeng, J.C., 1963, The viokn as a circuit: Journal Acoust. Soc America, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 326-338.
[2] Hutchins, CM. and Rodgers, 1992, Methods of changing the frequency spacing (delta) between the Al and Bl modes of the viokn:
Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 2, no. 1 (Series II), p. 13-19.
Jeffrey S. Loen
[email protected]
INSTRUMENTS OF INTEREST
Figure 1. Pie diagram showing main interests of 192responders to The instruments that interest me most are (multiple responses
CAS survey. Many readers chose more than one answer, giving a allowed):
total of 384 repkes. Percent of
Main Interests Responses (%) Respondees
Violin 155 (34.1) 82.9
of CASJ Readers other
Viola 96 (21.1) 51.3
Playing _ n=4, 1%
} Cello 84 (18.5) 44.9
~=yy, yy \.-
Acoustical Bass 35 ( 7.7) 18.7
Research New violin family 32 (7.0) 17.1
n= 12
Repair/ Guitar 39 (8.6) 20.9
Restoration
n=69. 18% Other 13 (2.9) 7.0
Instrument CAS members are interested in a variety of instruments (Fig. 3), the
Making
most popular of which are viokn, viola, and cello. We also have
many enthusiastic bass players and makers. The New Viokn Famky
has many dedicated adherents, as do fretted instruments including
Figure 2. Readers' assessment of degree of technical detak of CAS guitar and mandokn. Some members state that they are drawn to
Journal. Based on 169 responses. viols and other early string instruments, while others prefer
keyboard and wind instruments.
Technical Detail
"Not Technical
Enough" of CAS Journal IMPORTANCE OF PEER REVIEW
n=3,
The peer review states of articles is:
Responses Percent
Very important to me 70 43.2
Somewhat important to me 74 45.7
Not important to me 18 11.1
"About Right"
Responses to the question about peer review (Fig. 4) suggest that
readers want to retain the process of having papers evaluated by
professional peers before pubkcation, rather than simply accepting
and printing submittals with few questions and conditions. Some
Figure 3. Preferences of musical instruments, based on 454 readers express confusion about the purpose of "peer review", which
responses from 192 members. "NVF" is New Viokn Family. one reader accurately summarized as "to weed out crank stuff which
is plain wrong, and causes problems later."
Other
Instruments
Guitar n=.3,3% of Interest One instrument maker, who feels the CAS Journal is "too technical"
n said that peer review is very important, "but only if peers are viokn
makers, not academics or engineers." This brings up a vakd point,
NVF Violin
because few "viokn making" articles seem to meet the approval of
n=32, 7% 33%
highly technical reviewers who are non-makers. Authors of violin
Bass making articles often form conclusions based on personal judgment
n=3s, 8% and years of experience, and they often support their assertions
with little or no numerical evidence and few kterature references.
Such papers are kkely to be rejected when judged on a strict technical
Cello basis. For this reason, we try to send papers to reviewers of a
n=84, 19% Viola similar professional orientation. Regardless of the author's
n=96, 21%
professional persuasion, it is important to us to print articles in
Figure 4. Readers' opinions about peer review. Based on 162 which assertions are logically supported. This ekminates much of
responses. the opinions, anecdotes, and blind adherence to tradition that
masquerades as "information" in the viokn world.
"Not Importance of
Important" Peer Review
11%
SUBJECT SURVEY
We asked for ratings of interest of nine subject categories, with 47
'Very subtopics. The rating system ranges from one to five, with five
Important" being the highest level of interest and one being "no interest."
43% Readers responded differently to the survey, with some taking the
time to fill in all blanks, and others checking only their favorite
"Somewhat
Important" subjects. One thoughtful reader, rather than filkng in blanks, simply
46% stated, "I have no strong preferences—all these topics are appropriate
and interesting if well done."
The fokowing subjects have the highest ratings (in decreasing order Please offer specific suggestions for improving the CAS
of interest): Repair and adjustment (4.3), performance (4.1), Journal:
acoustical research (4.0), varnish, ground, and adhesives (4.0), strings Rather than offering specifics, many readers took the opportunity
(3.8), wood and other materials (3.7), string instrument history and to make general statements, some critical, some compkmentary. A
documentation (3.6), bows (3.5), and shop practices & manufacturing common theme is the degree of technical detak. The fokowing is a
(3.4). The subtopics with the highest ratings are about the effects of sample of responses:
various types of changes on instrument sound. For example, the
maximumvalue of 4.7 (Table 1) was given to "methods of improving
tone" and "diagnosing & solving tonal problems". A skghtly lower "Are we writing only for scientists?"
value of 4.6 was given to "effects of changes on sound" and "effects
of set-up on acoustical response", and 4.5 was given to "acoustical
effects of varnish". "As I am not a scientist, you loose me when it is too
mathematical and scientific. Perhaps you could put an
Please list additional topics you would like to see presented in emphasis on a more practical approach ofinstrument making,
the CAS Journal: try to popularize the more scientific articles."
We thought we had developed an exhaustive kst, and some readers
agreed, saying "If you can cover ak the above, you are doing very "Keep scientific approach central! Other journals kke JVSA,
well!" The following are suggestions for additional topics: Strad, Strings, and American Lutherie are covering general
interest and workbench procedures."
"Effects of different types and quakties of bow hair" "CAS Journal is already very good!"
"Debunking con men who claim to have discovered the secret "I'd prefer to have technical articles be less abstract, and
of Stradivarius and who get pubkcity from the naive media more closely related to instrument properties (playability,
(who else is quakfied to do this?)" sound character, etc.). I'dkke more why and how, and where
this leads in the article. Sometimes it seems like people
"Superiority of old violins, and commercial interest" measure things just for the heck of it."
"Baroque-Modern transitions and acoustical differences" "The last few issues of the Journal have been more than
"Acoustical mode measurements of classical concert viokns/ —
fabulous Excellent Work!"
violas/cellos" "Are we writing only for scientists? Violin maker/players
"Objective methods of tone testing in competitions" do not generaky have the background in physics and higher
"More down-to-earth information for instrument builders math to benefit from articles fiked with math formulas!"
who are not privileged to possess high-tech testing "I enjoy it the way it is."
equipment." "Reject highly technical articles—refer them to academic
"Any studies that help to relate what the researcher can journals"
measure with what the player and kstener perceive." "Thank you for a most interesting Journal!"
"Measurement of historic violins, with thickness of plates."
"More emphasis on the grandest of ak viokns — the bass." CONCLUSION
The readers' survey illustrates that our membership has changed
"Advice for the players based on physical function."
over the years. Viokn makers now dominate a group that began in
"Figure out why those old viokns are so kghtweight!" 1964 as a handful of skilled researchers and inquisitive players.
"Playing technique as it appkes to tone" Some of our current group express discomfort with technical tools
and methods that are the essence of the scientific approach of
"Would someone design a useful stiffness caliper? A experiment, data analysis, and explanation. Survey results tek us
"stiffness graduation map" of plates of great instruments that the burning desire of many current members is to obtain non-
would be very helpful." technical suggestions for improving tone. In contrast, the motivation
"Explanations for the non-scientist/non-mathematician that of original CAS members was to understand the workings of stringed
supplement the scientific presentation of studies and instruments. Wanting to improve tone is understandable. However,
experiments" it is doubtful that we can learn how to improve tone unless we first
seek, and attain, a basic technical understanding of how instruments
work. We are not there yet!
Knut Guettler
Norwegian Academy of Music
P.B. 519Q Majorstuen, N-0302 Oslo, Norway
[email protected]
ABSTRACT Does the timbre change when only the bowing position is
This presentation seeks to give an overview of present knowledge changed?
and theories concerning bowed-string transients and tone coloring. Regard Figure 2: Here the "rounded corner" causes the string release
Bowed instruments are quite unique in the way tone production to spread out over a smak transition interval before the fuk negative
results from a considerable number of physical parameters, many velocity is reached at slip. Accordingly, a comparable transition
of which are manipulated simultaneously by a single hand: bow takes place at capture. (In practice the transition at capture is often
—
"pressure" and speed; the bow's position on the string as wek as shorter than the one at release.) It can be shown that as long as these
the string's position on the bow hair; the bow-hair angle and impact transitions are independent of the bowing position, the force signal's
trajectory, to name the most important ones only. However, such spectral slope (envelope) wkl remain entirely unaffected by J3 (see
complexity makes a two-edged sword since there are often narrow Fig. 3). However, with the bow speed held constant, moving the
margins between perfection and blunder for the musician trying bow from one position (1) to another(2) wik change the sound level
to get the most out of his/her instrument. by an approximate factor /3Jfi2 ~ Av2/ Azo. Adjusting for this, the
spectral alterations will generaky be related to the low-leveled "node
BOW FORCE, POSITION, SPEED, AND THE SCHELLENG frequencies" of the "old" and "new" bowing positions (i.e., nf/fi
DIAGRAM and nfJJ32, where n-1, 2, 3... andf is the fundamental frequency).
Both Raman and Schekeng had the musician's perspective in mind These will, however, not contribute to an overall raise of higher
when performing some of their most intriguing analyses. While partials as the bow is moved towards the bridge, although fewer
Raman [1] partly collected empirical data by means of his and fewer ("node") partials wik be missing as the distance to bridge
mechanical bowing machine—where the bowing gesture in terms gets smaller. In Figure 3, spectral differences between simulations
of speed, normal force, and string position were ak controkable— with six different /? are compared:
Schelleng [2] utilized Raman's theoretical analysis on reflected
waves and used the same three parameters for mapping the
requirements for maintaining the Helmholtz motion. Figure 1: Diagram from Schelleng's JASA paper. Given a fixed
bow speed, the triangle sets the borders for maintaining Helmholtz
But Schelleng added one more important aspect: timbre. At two motion in a bowed string.
separate places within the Helmholtz-mode area in his diagram,
the expressions "brilkant" and "sul tasto" are marked as indications
of timbre. ("Sul tasto" kterarky means "by the fingerboard", but is RELATIVE POSITION OF BOW, /S
here, presumingly, a reference to soft tone color.) .01
t_J
It is not immediately apparent from the figure whether these timbre v
c_
differences are caused by change of bowing position (the two 0.100
v.
expressions are marked at different bow positions within the ID
Helmholtz area), or by change of bowing force (expressions are >
b.OlO
positioned at different values with respect to the ordinate). In the <-J
IxJ
discussion that followed, Schelleng showed how the waveform of cc
the string velocity under the bow is changing with bowforce. Later
0.7 1.4 2.8 4.2 7 14
Cremer [3] analyzed this more in depth, and estabkshed the theory BRIDGE TO BOW, CELLO A CM
of "the rounded corner". However, the remaining question is:
How much does the timbrechange as function ofbow force? axis roughly through the thumb and the middle finger. This means
Pickering [4] has shown how each violin strings has an "area of that gravity contributes a considerable amount to the bow force in
maximum bow-force sensitivity, and that this varies with the string bow positions close to the frog, and much less close to the tip. For
impedance and the core material. For a certain kght-gauge aluminum a normal violin bow, the change could be estimated to be
A-string with Perlon core, changing the bow force from 200 to 500 approximately 3 N, provided that the path of the bow is
mN resulted in a gain of more than 15 dB for the harmonics 5 approximately horizontal as when playing on the G-string. The
through 17 (bowing speed and position unaltered). Bowing with a major part of this change occurs within the last third of the bow
normal force so high that pitch flattening occurs typicaky produces toward the frog. The compensation is achieved by balancing the
a shrik sound with no real brilkance, and emphasis on the "near- bow with the index and kttle fingers on top of the bow stick on both
node" frequencies. This is more so for some string types than others. sides of the pivot point."
Nevertheless "excess bowforce" (with left-hand pitch compensation
in combination with a wide vibrato) is often used in expressive CHANGE OF DYNAMICS
passages, e.g., on the viokn G-string. Askenfelt further presents measurements of a series of strokes (their
transients excluded) where the most accurate player kept variations
Does the timbre change if only speed is changed? in bow force less than 0.2 N (around 50%) when playing at the
Yes, it does! And the reason is that changing the bow speed (without dynamic levelpiano, whke less than 0.7 N (around 33%) inforte. It
changing the bow force) alters the transition characteristics at is interesting to notice that for one of the two players, the piano
release/capture. Higher bow speeds give longer skp intervals. When strokes were performed with greater speed in piano (29 cm/s at a
moving the bow towards the bridge, the speed is usuaky reduced, bow-to-bridge distance 42 mm, and bow force 0.5 N) than in forte
and that is what causes the noticeable greater brkkance. Increasing (21 cm/s, 18 mm, 2.3 N), whilefor the otherplayer the corresponding
the bow "pressure" wik of course add to the effect. One should also figures were 21 cm/s (42 mm, 0.4 N) and 24 cm/s (20 mm, 1.7 N),
notice: with a fixed bowing position, when it is musicaky desirable respectively. The general tendency thus seems to be altering position
to maintain tone color best possibly while playing a diminuendo, andforce rather than speed in order to create the major part of the
both force and speed should be reduced simultaneously, because dynamic difference. The dynamic differences produced by the two
reducing the bow force alone would imply softening the tone color. players during these tests were about 9 dB for each of them. These
Double stops
When playing large-interval double stops, the bow force should
(normally) be balanced so that the string of lowest sounding pitch Figure 3: Spectral changes as the bow is movedfrom ft — 1/12 to ft
feels the greatest "pressure"—regardless of which string "carries = 1/7 while keeping other bowing parameters unaltered (the first
the melody". This prevents the pitch of the highest sounding string harmonics normalized to 0 dB). Apart from local deviations, the
to be flattened due to its significantly higher ft. (To count on left- high-end spectral decay fokows the same slope in ak the simulations.
hand compensation is not the greatest idea here!)
"Quasi 'plastic' friction" is a model where changes of value in the
Keeping the bow force even hyperbokc velocity-dependent friction curve are slowed down by a
time constant. The spectral tendency illustrated in this figure is,
In order to achieve an even sound throughout a stroke, the player
however, seen with a variety of friction models.
must actively be changing the fingers' action on the bow stick.
Askenfelt [5] writes: "The bow acts as a lever that pivots around an
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Time Time Harmonic number
Figure 4: Comparison of (simulated) slip patterns with three Figure 5: Spectral changes resulting from the different bow speeds
different bow speeds. The string velocity is shown relative to the utikzed in the simulations of Figure 4: The ampktudes of the first
bow velocity in each case. At high bow speeds, transitions from harmonics—as well as all harmonics of the reference—are
stick to fuk flyback velocity and back last longer than at lower bow normakzed to 0 dB. Reduced bow speed results in brighter sound.
speeds.
4
2
"I* , 0
> —1-2
v. ,
~ *1
■E -4
"E -8
a: 1U
12
-0,2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Harmonic number
last figures point at the role of timbre as means for expressing vioknists to prefer a tilted hair ribbon may, however, be found in
loudness. Remember that raising the bow velocity alone would the fact that tilting facilitates more gentle stroke onsets resulting
decrease the relative content of high partials, which to some extend from a more gradual string contact. Playing with "all the hairs on
would counteract the perception of increased loudness. We shall the string" could also give rise to noise caused by partial skpping,
neither forget that there is a practical side to the choice of bowing since the string's velocity relative to the bow will differ across the
position too, as forte notes can be played longer when bowed close hair ribbon [7]. Close to the bridge, this might even cause spiky
to the bridge, but in the above tests that was not an issue. skpping sounds [B].
Crescendo-diminuendo A pronounced feature of hair-ribbon tilting is the change of
The theoretical maximum range of wave energy in the string due to frequency for the bow's natural bounce rate, as for instance
differences in bow force aloneis 7T/V6 ~ 2.16 dB, whichreflects employed in ricochet. In a violin, a normal tilting angle of ca 30°
the ratio between a true sawtooth- and a pure (1. harmonic) sine causes the natural bounce rate to drop between 1 and 2 Hz [9]. The
wave. This means that by halving ft and doubkng the bow force, the point of impact on the string plays a role too, as playing closer to
energy of the signal could be increased up to a maximumof some 8 the bridge raises the rate somewhat. For rapid spiccato, playing with
dB, while the perceived difference in loudness would probably be the hair flat should hence give the best response, while for playing
significantly greater due to the change in timbre. A gradual halving down-stroke ricochet, progressively changing the hair angle from
of the ft, by the way, is best performed as illustrated in Figure 6 flat to tilted, is sometimes recommendable, as this to some extent
(particularly for instruments with long strings), since this technique counteracts the increased natural bounce rate closer to the tip (see
prevents introducing longitudinal friction forces during the move. below), making it easier to terminate bouncing at the end of the
stroke.
TILTING THE BOW-HAIR RIBBON
Vioknists often claim that tilting the bow provides greater brilliance. STARTING THE HELMHOLTZ MOTION
Pitteroff [7] found through measurements of string waveforms some In a recent paper [10], the wave buildup of the Helmholtz motion in
indications pointing in this direction. Pitteroff used a bowing bowed strings is described. It is shown that in order to start this
machine to ensure identical strokes, while spktting the hair bundle pattern as quickly as possible, the bow must be accelerated within
so that larger or smaker widths of hair had contact with the string. certain limits during the transient, unless substantial loss is present
In these experiments he found that the slipping intervals became by the nut. That is, under normal conditions the stroke cannot start
progressively shorter as the hair-ribbonwidth was decreased, albeit abruptly, "switched on". The tolerable acceleration values are
the effect was small (Askenfelt, Schoonderwaldt, and the present proportional to the fundamental frequency and inversely
author recently repeated this experiment with a thinner string where proportional string's wave resistance (or, if you prefer: to the string's
these spectral effects were quite noticeable). The main reason for vibrating mass). Acceleration must also increase with increasing
bow force. When starting a bow stroke, the string player has in
principle three options at hand: Figure 6: By angling the bow (Z - a), the contact point can be
moved along the string without introducing longitudinal friction
forces. From Guettler/Yorke Edition [6]
(1) starting the bow "from the air", i.e., with a certain bow
speed, but from zero bow force
(2) starting the bow "from the string", i.e., with some bow
force, but from zero bow speed
(3) starting the bow from zero bow speed and zero bow force.
with bowing parameters suitable for that same pitch fingered on the
same string (i.e., stopped where the highest node of the "harmonic"
Thomas M. Cox
3667 Woodland Dr
Baldwinsville, NY 13027
[email protected]
a viokn top weighing under 70 gm, c/p should be greater than 1.2 Measuring the tap tones of our wood strips, we obtain f = 1000
million cm4/gm sec =12 m4/kg sec. Hz and fcross = 250 Hz. The stiffness ratio, calculated using Equation
_
s>is5> is Emth / E s = (fw th / f ros/ = (1000/250)
__o.
v
' 2 =42= 16 o(Note: this
Please note that I have not included Q (The ratio of height to width value is OK for bi-tri tuning).
of a resonance peak in the frequency domain) in the figure of merit
(as c Q/p). I am unsure of its value to preliminary wood tests _
We obtain sound velocity c usingo Equation 3: c -with = 0.9728 fwith
J
because of the extreme variabikty of plate-wood Q to that of the lengthVthickness = 0.9728x1000x100/0.2 = 486500 cm/sec = 4865
finished instrument's resonances.. See [I], page 24. m/s (Note: this is a typical value for good spruce). The speed of
sound for the cross-cut piece is c =1216 m/sec (Note: cis pro-
Stiffness Ratio portional to f for same length and thickness. Hence c =c ,/4).
Q
We can calculate the, stiffness ratio based on E, or by squaring the
ratio of the tap tone frequencies. We note in Equation 1 for the two We obtain elastic modulus E using Equation 4: E. = c2 p = 4865 2 x
strips p, length, thickness are common and cancel out, leaving the 400 kg/m3 = 9.47x109 Pa = 9470 Mpa (Note: thisvalue should exceed
ratio 10000Mpa). E for the cross-cut piece is E^ = 591 Mpa (Note: Ewjth
/Ecross =9470/591 = 16).
- '
../Ecross = 0.946p (fwith/
E with >■ .J2 L 4/T2
= (f .J{cross'f (Equation 5)
' ' \ with'
0.946p1 (f . 2 4
/T
v cross) L 7
2 We obtainthe figure of merit using c^Jp = 1.22 x 106 (CGS) = 12.2
m 4/kg-sec (MKS) (Note: fine spruce exceeds about 12 m4/kg-sec
[3]). The figure ofmeritfor the cross-cut piece is c /p = 3.04 x 105
It has been observed that bi-tri plate tuning is difficult to achieve if
this ratio is greater than 15. Bi-tuning is difficult if this,, ratio is (cgs) = 3.04 (mks). (Note: this value should exceed 4 m4/kg-sec).
greater than 30.
COMPARING RESULTS
When the first set- of data is obtained, it can be used as a base-kne
TEST PROCEDURE
from which subsequent test strips can be evaluated, if the original
Cut two test strips to same dimensions from both top and back
dimensions are duplicated accurately. This is done by simply
tonewood; one with grain lengthwise and one with grain crosswise.
comparing the new tap tones with the base-kne ones.
Strips as small as 9 cm x 2.5 cm x 0.2 cm work fine. With each pair
of strips, match thickness carefuky. A 10% difference in thickness
wik cause a 20% error in stiffness ratio. Giving the original, parameters the subscript " ", we get c/c = f/f
(since length and thickness are unchanged). Hence c= c f/f.
Next, make a smak frame to hold two loops of string, each with a Next, p is calculatedfrom the new weight, which gives a new figure
of merit (c/p). Equation 5 is calculated direcdy from the taprtones.
rubber band in series to keep in tension. Rest the strip on the strings
[Note that if wood were isotropic it would be good practice to .
Also, if it is desired to know E, then E= Eg (c/cj 2 f/f However,
avoid cutting length-to-width ratios to integer ratios to obviate Equation 5 -and c/p are sufficient to determine the suitabikty of the
tonewood.
harmonics that could confuse identifying the frequency. However,
there is no need for doing this for spruce].
A simple way check tap tone frequency is with a piano keyboard. Figure 1. Cantilever method for testing wood
Even toy electronic keyboards are remarkably accurate since they
use quartz crystals, simkar to those used in digital clocks. Mark the
key frequencies on tape and set behind the keys. [Editor's note:
Another way to capture the tone is to use a microphone and the Micrometer
CoolEdit computer program (see article by King, this issue)]
SAMPLE CALCULATION
As an example, let us assume that we have prepared two wood
strips of same dimensions: length =10 cm, width = 5 cm, CLAMP
thickness=o.2 cm, and weight=4 gm (CGS units). One strip is cut A
with the grain, and one is cut across the grain. Volume equals 10
cm3 (10 x 5 x 0.2), so p equals 0.4 gm/cm 3 (4gm/10cc = 0.4 gm/cm 3 =
400 kg/m 3). [Note: the fokowing calculations can be done using a
scientific calculator (select [FSE, S for scientific) or the calculator Clampstring with strip at
bundled with Windows computers (select View/Scientific). Large
end
t P ( gm)
numbers will be displayed as powers of 10].
VERIFICATION OF THE TAP-TONE METHOD [3] Meyer, H,G, 1995, A practical approach to the choice of tone
The tap tone method was checked against a mechanical method of wood for the instruments of the violin family: Catgut Acoust.
measuring E similar to [4], but simpler to implement. The test strip v
Soc. Journal, 01.2, n0.7 (Series 2), p. 9-13.
is set up as a cantilever beam (Fig. 1), clamped at one end with a [4] Wood, C, 1996, Wood testing: Southern California
fixed weight at the other. A 34 cm strip was reduced in 3 cm steps Association of Violin Makers Bulletin. Also at
from 30 to 12 cm free length, with f measured at each step, f is http://www.scavm.com/Woods.htm
.
proportional to 1/length2 The measured value was compared to
the computed value at each step. Mean error was +/- 2.8%. E was REVIEWER'S REAdARKS:
calculated both ways. The six test mean value for c = 4033 m/s and "Very simple to do with precisely cut pieces from corners of the wood
from this, E = 9.92x10 9 Pa. Mechanical test values were c = 4024 blanks. A.nd it providesprecisely the information about the wood that is
m/s (E = 9.73xl09 Pa). most important. "
REFERENCES "I would do that test on everypiece of wood in storage as an essential bit
[1] Schelleng, J.C., 1963, The violin as a circuit: Journal Acoust.
of data to helpme choose decent wood."
Soc America, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 326-338.
[2] Hutchins, M.A., 1983, Physical measurements on sampling of
European spruce and maple for violin top and back plates:
Catgut Acoust. Soc. Newsletter No. 40, p. 28-30.
Jeffrey S. Loen
[email protected]
The practice of measuring tap tones is embedded in violin making In summary, these data on tap tones of old masters seem to confirm
tradition, even among makers who have little interest in more Hutchins' [1,5] statements that the tap-tone resonance (mode no. 5)
advanced acoustical techniques. Makers estimating tap tones on of professional violin top plates should have a frequency of 360-370
their own instruments often wonder about the tap tones of fine Hz. However, it should be pointed out that the effect of tap tones,
Italian instruments, although little such data have been published. and free-plate tuning in general, on the resulting frequency spectrum
Table 1 gives tap tones (from author's unpublished files) measured of the violin has been questioned [6]. It is useful to remember
for 1 1 top plates of old Italian instruments played by professionals. Curtin's remarks [7] that "The trouble with plate tuning is that it
Estimation of the frequency of the "ring mode" (mode 5 [1]) was offers seductively precise data whose meaning is only partially
done by professional violin makers and restorers in shops in the US understood." Additionalresearch is needed. If there are any useful
and Europe while the instruments were in for repairs. relationships between tap tones and instrument performance, we
are unlikely to discover them without compiling comprehensive
Results show that plates with bass bar generally give an F sharp descriptive and acoustical data from a range of instruments.
note (about 370 Hz). Notes without bass bar are 55-60 Hz lower,
and in one case a plate with an old bass bar is 45 Hz lower than the REFERENCES
same plate with a new bass bar.
[1] Hutchins, CM., 1983, Plate tuning for the violin maker: Catgut
Variables that control tap tones include outline, graduation, arching, Acoust. Soc. Newsletter no. 39, p. 25-32.
physical properties of the wood, and surface coatings such as ground [2] Hutchins, CM., Stetson, K.A., and Taylor, PA., 1971,
and varnish [1,2,3]. In addition, many of these instruments have Clarification of "free plate tap tones" by hologram
had extensive repairs including sound post patches, doubled edges, interferometry: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Newsletter no. 16, Nov.
and chest patches. Graduation values are known for these 1971, p. 15-23.
instruments (table 1), although arching character and wood [3] Strobel, H.A., 1988, Useful measurements for violin makers:
properties are not recorded. A few instruments having greater A reference for shop use (4th Ed.): Henry A. Strobel,
thickness values between the ff-holes seem to have slightly lower Aumsville, OR, 46 p.
tap tones. [4] Hutchins, CM., 1970, More about plate tap tones: Catgut
Acoust. Soc. Newsletter no. 14, p. 15-17.
Previous work gives some additional data on tap tones of old Italian [5] Hutchins, CM., 1982, Stradivarius plate tests: Catgut Acout.
violins, and a variety of recommendations for tap tones of top plates. Soc. Newsletter no. 37, p. 30.
Hutchins [4] presents resonance curves for a 1727 Stradivari violin [6] Schleske, M., 2000, Eigenmodes of vibration in the working
showing a tap tone at D sharp (315 Hz). Hutchins et al [2] list values process of a violin: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal vol. 4, no. 1
of D to D sharp (304-307 Hz) for "well-tuned plates", although they (Series II), p. 90-95.
present data showing that a Guarneri del Gesu violin top rings at F [7] Curtin, J., 1993, The trouble with plate tuning: Violin Society
sharp (363 Hz). The 1713 "Wirth" Stradivariviolin (Note: this is a of America, Proceedings of 20th Convention (Part I), vol. 12,
differentviolin from the 1713 Strad listed in Table 1) gave a tap tone no. 3, p. 21-34.
of F sharp (360 Hz) [s]. Strobel [3] gives a representative value of F
(349 Hz) for violin.
Table 1. Tap tones of Old Master plates. Tap tone notes are as reported (frequencies in Hz are approximate), "nd" indicates no date.
Antonio Stradivari, Cremona, 1700 slightly flat F (340) with new bar 2.2-2.9
G.B. Guadagnini, Taurin, 1785 skghtly flat E (325) with old bar 2.6-3.2
F# (370) with new bar
A. Thomas King
[email protected]
ABSTRACT [6]. I have glued a small piece of thin leather to one end of the tube
Frequencies of principal modes (AO, 80, 81, Tl, and C2) were to protect the instrument's varnish. Place the tube lightly on the
measured using the Fuhr technique for 19 historic instruments instrument, moisten a thumb and finger and grip the top of the tube
ranging in size from a violino piccolo to a tenor viola. The lightly between them. Slide the fingers downthe tube. With a bit of
instruments include 14 museum specimens (made in Italy, Germany, practice, you will hear distinctive noises, something like the honking
Austria between 1564 and 1824), and five 18th century Italian violins of a goose. The tone you hear is an eigenfrequency of the violin
played by performers and teachers. Generally, body length shows corpus.
a negative correlation with modal frequency, with the tiny violino
piccolo giving very high frequency modes, and the large violas giving Each of the corpus modes, 81, Tl, and C2, is activated by placing
low values. Full-sizeviolins gave "shotgun" patterns for most modes, the glass tube at specific locations suggested by Schleske (personal
and the values compare favorably with previous work. The clearest communication, 2002). 81, the main corpus mode, is activated by
and most definitive modes are associated with the finest placing the tube near the inner edge of the bass f-hole a little below
professional instruments, including Italian violins made by Carlo the notch. Tl is activated by placing the tube about 30 mm in from
Bergonzi, Domenico Montagnana, Francesco Stradivari, and Carlo the edge and near the middle of the treble C-bout on the back plate.
Antonio Testore. C2 is activated by placing the tube near the purfling near the middle
of the treble C-bout on the back plate.
INTRODUCTION
For the past several years I have been collecting modal information DATA CAPTURE AND ANALYSIS
for the better instruments that I have had the opportunity to examine. I record the sounds of the modes using a small microphone attached
I was inspired to do this by Martin Schleske's path-breaking work to a laptop PC running the program "CoolEdit" [7]. The program
on making "tonal copies" [1,2]. If one hopes to make tonal copies, allows the user to record, edit, and analyze the frequency spectrum,
then information about modes is necessary. Unfortunately, little and identifies peaks in cycles per second (Hz; Fig. 1).
such information is readily available.
SOURCES OF ERROR
PROCEDURE Please note my study methods are simple and subject to uncertainty.
To collect modal information (frequencies of AO, 80, 81,T1,C2), Recordings took place in the ambient space with no ability to control
we need a way to activate the modes ofinterest, a way to capture the echoes or other reverberations. Although one becomes proficient
data, and a way to analyze them that allows us to identify at generating the honking noises, it is possible to move the
frequencies. frequencies about somewhat by pressing down more or less firmly
and squeezing the glass tube more or less. Usually, I generated each
MODE ACTIVATION mode several times, giving me the opportunity to exclude spurious
To activate the main air or "Helmholtz" (AO) mode, I blow lightly trials. Finally, errors may exist in the analysis and identification of
across the bass f-hole. various modes. As a rule, values for AO and BO are reliable. Bl is
usually strong and definitive. Tl and C2 are somewhat less certain.
To activate the body (BO) mode, I hold the instrument near the
purfling at the widest point of the lower bout with my left hand INSTRUMENTS ANALYZED
thumb and middle finger. With the bridge resting lightly on my I have been able to test several instruments over the past two years,
chest (to dampen the strings), I tap the scroll gently with my other usually as part of the work I have done with JeffLoen on measuring
hand (see [3] for more information on determining these modes). instrument graduations [B]. The quality of the instruments ranges
from fine soloist-grade violins by Carlo Bergonzi and Domenico
To activate all the other modes, I use the Fuhr technique [4,5], using Montagnana, to somewhat lower-level instruments by makers of
a thin glass tube about 1.5 mm in diameter and about 150 mm long lesser renown.
Figure 1. Example of determination of frequency of air cavity Figure 2. Cremonese violin made by Hieronymus Amati in 1609
mode (AO) using Cool Edit [7]. Frequency response outlined in (National Music Museum).
white was recorded using microphone while blowing across bass
ff-hole. Analysis screen (lower right) identifies AO frequency as
264 Hz.
Figure 4. Relation of main air mode (Helmholtz mode; AO) and Figure 5. Relation of higher frequency corpus modes to body
body mode (BO) to body length. No V value was recorded for length. No V values were recorded for values lying on X-axis.
value lying on X-axis.
REFERENCES
characteristic of "soft" violins and values above 550 Hz having a [1] Schleske, M., 1996, On making "tonal copies" of a violin:
harsher, brighter sound [2]. Full-size violins in the study cover a Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 3, no. 2 (Series II), p. 18-28.
broad range of Bl frequencies (479-580 Hz). This range is somewhat [2] Schleske, M., 2002, Empirical tools in contemporary violin
broader than therange of500-565 Hz given by Schleske [2] for 1 1 old making—Part I. Analysis of design, material, varnish, and
violins. All are higher thanthe value of475 Hz given by Schleske [1] normalmodes: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 4, no. 5 (Series
for a 1740 Montagnana violin. Schleske gives a value of 524 Hz for II),p. 50-63.
the Bl of a 1712 Stradivari violin [2]. [3] Hutchins, CM., and Voskuil, D., 19934, Mode tuning for the
violin maker: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 2, no. 4 (Series
The Tl mode, the lower of the two corpus modes, causes strong II),p. 5-9.
sound radiation due to pumping movements and vibrations [2]. [4] Fuhr, X., 1958, Die Akustischen Ratsel der Geige (The
Values recorded range from 334 to 527 Hz. Values for full-size acoustical riddles of the violin): Verlag Friedrich Hofmeister,
violins range from 418 to 494 Hz, compared to 448 Hz for a 1712 Frankfurt am Main, 187 p.
Stradivari violin describedby Schleske [2]. The C2mode, the higher [5] Wall, E., 1993, A trial of Fuhr's method of testing violins and
of the two corpus modes, is related to strong twisting of the body, violin plates: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 2, no. 4 (Series
and this moderadiates sound weakly [2]. Full-size violins gave C 2 II),p. 15-17.
values of 351-421 Hz, compared to a value of 409 Hz for a 1712 [6] A source for such tubes is Warner Instrument Corp., Tel.
Stradivari violin [2]. 203-776-0664 Fax.203-776-1278
[7] Cool Edit, developed by Syntrillium Software Corp. See
An additional observation based on this work is that the clearest http://www.syntrillium.com.
and most definitive modes are shown by the finest quality [8] Loen, J.S., and King, A.T., 2002, Thick and thin: The Strad,
instruments, such as the Bergonzi, Montagnana, and Testore violins, Orpheus Publications, London, vol. 113, no. 1352, p. 1354-
which are owned by professional players. The F. Stradivari violin -1359.
also had notably strong clear modes, although we were unable to [9] Spear, D.Z., 1987, Achieving an air-body coupling in violins,
evaluate its sound. violas and cellos: A practical guide for the violin maker: Catgut
Acoust. Soc. Newsletter no. 47, p. 4-7.
[10] Hutchins, CM., 1990, Some of the effects of adjusting the AO
and the BO modes of a violin to the same frequency: Catgut
Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 1, no. 5 (Series II), p. 35-37.
Table 1. Modal frequencies recorded for European violins and violas. Body lengths are caliper measurements. NMM numbers refer to
catalog numbers at National Music Museum, Vermillion, So. Dakota.
Bros Amati (Cremona) 1613 violino piccolo 266 343 329 761 527 n/a NMM No. 3361;
unmodified condition
Lorenzo Storioni (Cremona) 1793 small violin 299 309 352 n/a n/a n/a NMM No. 3359
Hieronymus Amati (Cremona) 1609 violin 342 284 240 502 432 372 NMM No. 3364
Brescian School (Brescia) c 1630 violin 355 287 n/a n/a 450 n/a "NMM No. 3363; Bl is
very weak, hard to
determine"
Brescian School (Brescia) c 1640 violin 352 284 293 522 445 380 NMM No. 3358
Pietro J. Rogeri (Brescia) 1715 violin 328 253 248 580 427 n/a NMM No. 3362
Composite N. Italian 1719 violin 332 307 297 512 454 399 Francesco Stradivari
belly; NMM No. 3414;
clear, lively modes
Carlo Bergonzi (Cremona) 1732 violin 349 282 253 535 459 393 Soloist instrument
Domenico Montagnana (Venice) 1740 violin 355 267 261 518 439 385 "Dutchess of Cleveland"
Concertmaster instrument
Carlo Antonio Testore (Milan) 1748 violin 355 288 240 544 451 421 Well-regarded; present
owner purchased in
preference to a Strad
Tomaso Carcassi (Florence) 1759 violin 356 262 306 497 436 369 NMM No. 4899; weak Bl
Ferdinando Gagliano (Naples) c!784 violin 346 274 269 528 434 351 Warm, dark sound. Not
strong solo instrument,
but very beautiful
Joseph Gagliano (Naples) 1791 violin 358 280 248 479 418 354 weak sound
J.G. Hamm (Markneukirchen) 1796 violin 365 287 267 517 468 415 NMM No. 5204;
unmodified condition;
Bl weak relative to Tl
Giovanni B. Ceruti (Cremona) 1801 violin 350 290 247 543 450 407 NMM No. 4900; weak Bl
Peregrino di Zanetto (Brescia) 1564 viola 438 204 200 369 334 276 NMM No. 3367
Andrea Guarneri (Cremona) 1664 tenor viola 482 172 134 n/a n/a n/a NMM No. 3354;
unmodified condition
Nichola Bergonzi (Cremona) 1781 viola 410 225 178 436 397 374 NMM No. 6046
Jeffrey S. Loen
[email protected]
ABSTRACT large differences in the overall structures of back and top plates.
Many classic Cremonese violins that are in demand by the best Back plates invariably define concentric patterns having the
modern players have top plates that are carved in the reverse of the maximum thickness near the center. Concentric contour lines vary
usual pattern. Rather than being thick between the ff-holes (normal from circular "bull's eye" patterns to longitudinal patterns (see fig.
graduation), these plates display minimumvalues (1.5-2.3 mm) near 1). In contrast, top plates often have a structure that, in the broadest
the center and thicken towards the edges (reverse graduation). An sense, has been described as a "membrane" [B]. However, when
evaluation of contour maps of 105 Cremonese violin top plates by examined in detail the area between the ff-holes is often different
ten Golden Age makers suggests that most (60%) of the plates are from the thickness of the upper and lowerbouts. Adequate data on
reverse graduated. Only nine plates (including four by Nicolo the area between the ff-holes are required to classify these areas as
Amati, none by Stradivari and three by Guarneri del Gesu) are thicker (normal graduation) or thinner (reverse graduation) than
normally graduated, similar to the pattern recommended in modern the upper and lower bouts.
violin making schools, books, and articles. Reverse graduated
violins include some of the best preserved Strads ("Messiah", "Muir- On published maps showing thickness data (for example, the Strad
MacKenzie") and del Gesus ("Alard", "Soil"), suggesting that this poster series [9]), measurements are often omitted in the critical
graduation pattern is not solely the result of regraduation. In area between the ff-holes, although data are sufficient to suggest
contrast, top plates of most Italian and German violins in the that Nicolo Amati's 1666 violin is normal graduated and Stradivari's
database made after the close of the Golden Age around 1750 are 1694 "Muir-Mackenzie" [9] is reverse graduated. Biddulph's volume
classified as having normal graduation. on Guarneri del Gesu [10] gives adequate data to show goodexamples
ofboth normal and reverse graduation. Additional graduation maps
INTRODUCTION of Cremonese instruments were obtained from research in
Modern violin makers are taught to make spruce top plates thick in museums, and donations from research collaborators in the US and
the center and thinner toward the edges ([1,2,3,4]; in roughly the Europe. My collaborators chose to remain anonymous, and ask
same way that maple back plates are graduated). The famous that instrument names be kept confidential. Clearly, some
"Canon" violin by Guarneri del Gesu, which was played by Italian publishers, instrument owners, and researchers do not want to be
soloist Nicolo Paganini, is often cited as a clean example of a associated with the stigma of "too thin" plates.
"normally" graduated Cremoneseviolin top plate (fig. 1) that should
be emulated. The implication is that the Canon is typical of Incidentally, it is important to use contour maps for distinguishing
Cremonese concert violins that have not been modified, and that graduation types, rather than the thickness graduation plots that
modified violins are somehow inferior acoustically and structurally. appear in most published sources of graduation data. Contour
However, before accepting such a notion we should ask, "how maps make distinguishing reverse vs. normal graduation patterns
common is 'normal' graduation in working Cremonese concert as easy as reading a topographical map.
violins?" Is the Canon example a general case, or is it a glaring
exception?
"How common is 'normal' graduation in
The overall style of plate graduation can be defined based on visual working Cremonese concert violins?"
examination of contour maps that show lines of equal thickness (in
millimeters; [see 5,6,7 for descriptions of the current project, and
computer methods of contouring]). In this paper 105 historic
Cremonese top plates are evaluated and "normal" and "reverse" NORMAL GRADUATION OF TOP PLATES
graduation patterns are distinguished. A contour map of a normally graduated plate resembles a
topographic map of a mountain peak or ridge, in which contour
DEFINING GRADUATION PATTERNS lines decrease concentrically away from the center (Figs. 1,2). The
Classic Italian violin plates show a variety of graduation patterns thickest values between the ff-holes are often 3.5 mm or more, and
on computer-generated contour maps, and it is common to see the wood pinches down towards minimum values of about 2.5-
Figure 1. Thickness Contour maps of the 'Canon' violin, Guarneri del Gesu, 1743 [10]. The graduations are thought to be unmodified.
Top and back plates show normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Black dots indicate locations of measurement
points. Contour interval 0.25 mm. Viewed from outside. Note: Caliper measurements by Candi (1937 [22]) suggest that the top plate is
actually thicker (4.1-4.3 mm in the center) and the back plate is thinner (max 5.6 mm rather than 6.2 mm) than is suggested by modern
measurements using magnetic thickness gauges. A possible explanation for the differenceis the large margin of error of the single-magnet
thickness gauge at thicknesses greater than 4.0 mm.
3.0 mm in the upper and lower bouts. Contour lines often are (Figs. 3,4). The thickest parts of reverse graduated Cremonese tops
irregular, sometimes containing closed contours of higher or lower are often at the edges, which attain maximum values around 4.0
values. mm. In addition, the areas between the ff-holes and the C-bouts
often show the maximum values (3.0-3.6 mm) of the part of the top
REVERSE GRADUATION OF TOP PLATES plate inside the linings. Patterns are often highly irregular. Contour
The opposite situation, in which contour values increase away from maps of these top plates often show a closed semicircular contour
the center, produces a map that superficially looks like a of minimum value, 20-35 mm in diameter, positioned at or slightly
topographical valley or basin. Reverse graduation patterns have higher than the bridge position (Figs. 5,6). In some cases (Fig. 7), the
minimum thickness values (1.5-2.3 mm) near the center between contours for minimum thickness values define a longitudinal trough
the ff-holes, and larger thickness values further away from the center extending from the upper to the lower bouts.
Figure 2. Thickness graduation maps of a violino piccolo, Brothers Amati, 1613, in unmodified condition [11]. Top and back plates show
normal graduation, in which contour lines decrease away from the center. Note: this is not a concert violin, although it is an important
example of an early Cremonese instrument. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Measurements are shown in millimeters (contour
interval 0.25 mm). Viewed from outside.
Body 266.0 mm
Upper bout 124.4 mm
Middle bout 85.3 mm
Body 266.2 mm
Lower bout 148.4 mm
Arching 10.5 mm Upper bout 125.7 mm
Middle bout 84.8 mm
spacing 34.9 mm
Rib height 22.5-24.2 mm Lower bout 150.0 mm
Arching 12.1 mm
Rib thickness <1. 0-1.1 mm
Weight 207 One-piece slab maple
Weight 207 g
CLASSIFYING GRADUATION PATTERNS OF GOLDEN AGE concentric contour lines in the upper and lower bouts. Top plates
VIOLIN TOP PLATES that have no discernable concentric contour patterns are classified
A sample population of 105 violin top plates by ten major Cremonese as "undefined", and top plates lacking measurements in the area
makers was systematically evaluated to determine the relative between the ff-holes are classified as having "insufficient data."
abundance of normal and reverse graduation patterns (Table 1).
The age of the instruments ranges from 1564 to 1737. Plates having Results (Table 2) suggest that 60% of these Golden Age violins are
concentric contour lines that generally decrease away from the reverse-graduated, 23% are undefined, 9% display normal
center are classified as "normal", whereas plates with contours that graduation, and 8% have insufficient data. The earliest Cremonese
increase away from the center are classified as "reverse". Reverse makers, Andrea Amati, the Brothers Amati, and Nicolo Amati,
graduated plates commonly have extreme minimum thickness each have a few normally graduated plates. Nicolo Amati has the
values of as little as 1.4 mm in the center and 1.0 mm in the bouts largest proportion of normally graduated plates, at four (50%) of
(Table 1). In many cases, particularly with violins by Stradivari, a the sample of eight plates. Guarneri del Gesu was the only other
chest patch (to add reinforcement and correct arching deformities) maker for which normal graduated tops are identified. For 38
obscures the graduation pattern in the ec-bout area, although a pre- Guarneri del Gesu violin top plates, three (the 'Canon,' 'Haddock,'
existing reverse graduation pattern can be inferred based on the and an unnamed 1742 violin) are classified as normal, 27 are
Figure 3. Thickness graduation maps of the 'Kreisler' violin, Guarneri del Gesu, 1733, the career violin of American soloist Fritz Kreisler
[12]. Top plate shows reverse graduation, and back plate shows normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Measurements
are shown in millimeters (contour interval 0.25 mm). Viewed from outside.
Body 353 mm
Upper bout 166.5 mm
Middle bout 108.5 mm
Lower bout 203 mm Upper bout 166 mm
Arching 14.5 mm Middle bout 108 mm
Weight 434.8 g Lower bout 203.5 mm
(w/boxwood chin rest Arching 14.5 mm
and accessories) Two-piece quarter maple
classified as reverse, and eight are undefined. Del Gesus thought to instruments, including the 1716 "Messiah," which is in nearly
be unmodified include the "Canon" (Fig. 1; normal graduated), the pristine condition, the 1694 "Muir-Mackenzie," which Hargrave [9]
"Alard" (reverse graduated), which Chaudiere [21] calls "the best calls "a rare and beautiful example of a 'clean' Stradivarius", and
preserved of all the 'del Gesu' instruments", and the "Soil" (reverse the 1693 "Harrison" (Fig. 8), considered "the greatest surviving
graduated), which Hargrave [9] describes as "in an almost perfect concert instrument of the 17th century."
state of preservation".
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
The majority (60%) of 43 plates by Antonio Stradivari are classified Effects of Graduation Pattern on AcousticalPerformance
as reverse graduated, and none are normally graduated. Almost Golden Age violins known for high performance include both
one quarter of the Stradivari plates are undefined, probably in part normal and reverse graduated examples, although reverse patterns
because of effects of extensive repairs and patching. Violins with dominate. The fact that most of these reverse graduated instruments
reverse-graduated plates include many of Stradivari's most famous are working modern concert violins indicate that they are
Figure 4. Thickness contour maps of the 'D'Egville' violin (Guarneri del 1737 [10]). Top plate shows a well-developed reverse
graduation pattern, and back plate shows normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Black dots indicate locations of
measurement points. Contour interval 0.25 mm. Viewed from outside.
Body 350 mm
Upper bouts 165 mm Upper bouts 164 mm
Middle bouts 109 mm Middle bouts 109.25 mm
Lower bouts 203.5 mm Lower bouts 204.5 mm
Arching 12.5 mm Arching 14.2 mm
2-piece maple, quarter
acoustically successful and, in highly desireable. The arching and wood quality remain equal. This is verified, in part, by
performance of some of the normally graduated del the extremely low weight (usually 355-385 g) of reverse graduated
especially the is likewise unassailable. For example, luthier violins in the database. Vigdorchik [23] comments that Stradivari's
Sesto Rocchi [22] stated "its maker used thicknesses then considered thin plates "flex in the opposite fashion" from plates of Nicolo
out of the average. I am convinced that those thicknesses are greatly Amati that were made thicker in the middle section. Vigdorchik
responsible for the fact that the violin has retained its power and [23] concludes "...it is this significant difference in the flexibility of
quality of sound, equaled in this only by very few other instruments." the plates that determines the characteristic timbres of these
This quote tells us that the Canon's thick graduations were unusual instruments..." I speculate that the acoustical consequences of
even when it was new. minimal thickness (as little as 1.5 mm) in the bridge area might
include larger vibration amplitude related to reduced mass loading.
Such major differences in thickness distribution would be expected
to cause differences in weight and flexibility, if other things such as In summary, examples of both normal and reverse graduated violins
Table 1. Classification of graduation types, top plates of Cremonese violins, 1564-1738. "G" refers to "Guarneri." Grads is number of
thickness measurements on top plate. Class (Graduation class) is as follows: n, normal; r, reverse; i, insufficient data; undefined. Length
refers to plate length (caliper distance, mm). Arch is maximum arching height, mm. "Anon" source indicates contributor wishes to
remain anonymous. Mm (minimum), Mean (average), Max (maximum), and sd (standard deviation) are statistics on the thickness
measurements for each plate, n/a is "not available".
Maker Date GradIs Class Name Length Arch Source Mm Mean Max Sd
Amati, Andrea 1564 26 i Charles IX 343.5 16.0 [9] 2.10 2.80 3.30 0.29
Amati, Andrea 1574 135 n n/a 340 15.3 [11] 2.00 2.60 3.50 0.29
Amati, Andrea 1577 135 v n/a 351.5 15.3 [11] 1.20 2.11 3.30 0.45
Amati, Bros 1604 115 r n/a 340.5 18.0 [11] 1.00 1.74 3.30 0.49
Amati, Bros 1609 136 v n/a 342 14.5 [11] 1.40 2.13 3.10 0.40
Amati, Bros 1613 93 n n/a 266 11.5 [11] 1.50 2.04 2.70 0.34
Amati, Nicolo 1628 200 n n/a 352 14.2 [11] 2.00 2.61 3.30 0.30
Amati, Nicolo 1649 26 v Alard 352 16.5 [13] 2.50 2.97 4.00 0.29
Amati, Nicolo 1650 133 n n/a 353.5 n/a [14] 1.90 2.81 4.30 0.36
Amati, Nicolo 1654 125 r Brookings 353.5 15.9 [12] 2.00 2.58 3.70 0.35
Amati, Nicolo 1655 53 n n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.47 3.20 0.34
Amati, Nicolo 1666 46 n n/a 353.5 16.0 [9] 2.00 2.57 3.50 0.37
Amati, Nicolo 1667 72 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.34 3.00 0.33
Amati, Nicolo n/a 23 i n/a n/a 17.0 [15] 2.50 2.91 3.20 0.21
Bergonzi, C 1731 37 i n/a n/a n/a [9] 2.20 2.85 3.60 0.31
Bergonzi, C 1732 145 r n/a 349 14.2 Anon 1.60 2.53 3.50 0.33
Bergonzi, C 1734 55 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.60 3.20 0.35
G del Gesu 1727 46 r Dancla 354 16.8 [10] 2.10 2.83 3.90 0.41
G del Gesu 1728 89 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.56 3.30 0.29
G del Gesu 1729 46 r Stretton 351.5 15.0 [10] 1.70 2.72 3.70 0.44
G del Gesu 1730 140 r Goldberg 353 n/a [14] 2.10 2.80 3.80 0.33
G del Gesu 1730 134 r Kreisler 353.5 15.0 [12] 2.00 2.74 3.80 0.39
G del Gesu 1731 46 v Baltic 349 16.5 [10] 2.20 2.71 3.40 0.36
G del Gesu 1733 146 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.50 2.39 3.40 0.35
G del Gesu 1733 45 r Soil 352 15.5 [9] 2.10 2.62 3.50 0.36
G del Gesu 1734 46 n Haddock 349 16.5 [10] 2.30 2.71 3.60 0.28
G del Gesu 1734 63 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.41 2.90 0.19
G del Gesu 1734 127 r n/a 350.3 20.5 Anon 2.00 2.56 3.40 0.32
G del Gesu 1734 46 r V. dv Diable 349.8 15.5 [10] 2.10 2.65 3.20 0.26
G del Gesu 1735 46 r D'Egville 349 12.5 [10] 2.20 2.73 3.50 0.31
G del Gesu 1735 47 r King 350 13.0 [10] 2.70 3.13 4.20 0.28
G del Gesu 1735 27 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.90 2.48 3.00 0.26
G del Gesu 1735 46 r Plowden 350 13.5 [10] 2.20 2.83 3.50 0.29
G del Gesu 1736 19 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.50 2.80 3.20 0.19
G del Gesu 1737 46 r Joachim 351.5 15.8 [10] 2.50 2.86 3.40 0.22
G del Gesu 1737 46 r King Joseph 351 16.0 [10] 2.20 2.69 3.30 0.29
G del Gesu 1737 46 r Stern 352.5 14.7 [10] 1.80 2.73 3.40 0.36
G del Gesu 1738 126 r Adam n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.62 3.70 0.25
G del Gesu 1738 46 r Kemp 352.8 15.2 [10] 2.30 2.77 3.40 0.25
G del Gesu 1739 46 r Kortschak 351.5 17.4 [10] 1.60 2.51 3.60 0.37
G del Gesu 1740 46 v Heifetz 354.5 15.8 [10] 2.20 3.02 3.50 0.25
G del Gesu 1740 45 r Ysaye 352.8 16.8 [10] 2.00 2.61 3.50 0.29
G del Gesu 1741 46 r Koch anski 351.5 15.0 [10] 2.20 2.99 3.80 0.42
G del Gesu 1741 46 v Vieuxtemps 352.8 15.0 [10] 2.50 2.85 3.50 0.31
G del Gesu 1742 42 r Alard 352.4 14.2 [9] 2.30 2.69 3.10 0.23
G del Gesu 1742 60 n Canon 353 15.0 [9] 2.50 3.11 3.70 0.24
G del Gesu 1742 46 v Lord Wilton 353.5 14.0 [10] 2.30 2.85 3.80 0.30
G del Gesu 1742 34 n n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.52 2.90 0.25
G del Gesu 1743 48 r Carrodus 351 16.0 [10] 2.20 2.87 3.70 0.30
G del Gesu 1743 46 r Sauret 351 17.4 [101 2.40 2.78 3.50 0.27
Maker Date Grads Class Name Length Arch Source Mm Mean Max Sd
G del Gesu 1744 48 v Doyen 350.5 15.5 [10] 2.00 2.58 3.20 0.27
G del Gesu 1744 46 v Ole Bull 351 16.1 [10] 1.60 2.71 3.20 0.34
G del Gesu 1745 46 v Leduc 353.5 17.0 [10] 1.90 2.62 3.70 0.33
G del Gesu 1739-41 40 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.90 2.59 3.20 0.24
G del Gesu 174 x 26 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.60 2.36 2.70 0.28
G del Gesu & 17xx 30 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.46 3.50 0.38
Jos Guar fil Andrea
Andrea 1677 46 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.50 2.05
G Joseph fil. 1705 64 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.50 2.29 3.00 0.40
G Joseph fil. 1710 34 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.50 2.03 2.70 0.34
G Joseph fil. 1714 32 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.60 2.08 3.00 0.40
G Joseph fil. 17xx 86 v n/a n/a 15.5 [15] 1.80 2.87 4.50 0.75
Ruggieri, F 1684 23 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.75 2.39 3.10 0.31
A c 1670 51 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.30 2.90 0.31
A 1679 123 v Hellier n/a n/a [14] 2.20 2.87 3.80 0.27
A 1682 230 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.76 3.80 0.24
A 1683 43 r Cipriani P n/a 15.0 [13] 2.00 2.60 3.25 0.24
A 1685 36 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.10 2.11 3.20 0.46
A 1693 200 r Harrison 362 15.5 [11] 1.65 2.38 3.30 0.35
A 1694 57 r Muir MacKen 362.5 16.0 [9] 2.30 2.61 3.00 0.18
A 1697 83 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.20 2.70 3.90 0.41
A 1699 94 r Castelbarco 357.0 17.0 [12] 1.90 2.35 3.00 0.23
A 1700 44 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.49 3.20 0.25
A 1700 87 v Ward 351.0 15.9 [12] 1.60 2.31 3.10 0.38
A 1701 36 i n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.15 2.70 0.23
A 1702 27 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.60 1.91 2.60 0.25
A 1703 21 i Alsager n/a 16 [16] 1.50 2.15 2.70 0.35
A 1703 190 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.90 2.44 3.20 0.21
A 1704 94 r Betts 353.0 16.3 [12] 2.10 2.57 3.40. 0.28
A 1705 75 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.52 4.00 0.45
A 1707 75 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.42 3.60 0.30
A 1708 30 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.40 1.92 3.00 0.41
A 1709 121 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.25 3.10 0.36
A 1710 33 i n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.65 2.90 0.23
A 1711 17 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.90 2.41 2.90 0.29
A 1712 48 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.41 2.90 0.24
A 1713 44 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.48 3.00 0.27
A 1714 51 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.66 3.40 0.31
A 1715 22 v Cremonese 355.5 15.4 [17] 2.30 2.76 3.50 0.34
A 1716 69 r Mediceo 356.0 15.4 [18] 2.00 2.74 4.00 0.36
A 1716 48 r Messiah 356.0 15.5 [13] 2.00 2.71 4.00 0.40
A 1717 54 r n/a n/a n/a [19] 1.90 2.30 3.30 0.32
A 1717 45 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.50 3.00 0.24
A 1718 130 r n/a 352 16.6 Anon 1.50 2.32 3.20 0.37
A 1719 78 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.36 3.50 0.28
A 1719 64 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.50 2.23 3.00 0.31
A 1724 42 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.39 2.90 0.22
A 1726 35 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.23 3.00 0.43
A 1727 20 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.50 4.40 0.74
A 1727 40 r n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.80 2.41 3.10 0.36
A 1727 24 v n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.10 1.84 2.50 0.41
A 1728 42 i Milanollo 352 16.7 [9] 1.90 2.42 3.20 0.35
A 1731 19 i n/a n/a n/a Anon 1.70 2.43 3.20 0.41
A c 1733 177 r Pushilov n/a 18.0 [20] 1.70 2.67 4.50 0.50
A 1734 26 i n/a n/a n/a Anon 2.00 2.42 3.00 0.18
A 1736 185 v Oistrakh 358.0 14.0 [20] 2.00 2.60 3.60 0.31
Stradivari, F 1719 139 r n/a 332 13.0 [11] 1.85 2.72
Figure 5. Thickness graduation maps of a fine concert violin by Antonio Stradivari, 1707 (instrument name withheld by request of
contributor). Top plate shows reverse graduation with a prominent semicircular minimum thickness contour at bridge position, and
back plate shows normal graduation. Measured with caliper. Measurements are shown in millimeters (contour interval 0.25 mm).
are known for exceptional sound, although the reverse graduated free plate tuning were developed based on what produced "good
ones are much more abundantand the high performance might be sounding instruments", although this was done empirically and
explained by lighter weight, reduced mass loading, and increased with little regard for the nature of successful Cremonese violins.
flexibility (although this needs verification). However, it appears
that there are important exceptions, and no single explanation exists In contrast, results of this study will be no surprise to Schleske [25],
for the structure and performance of the finest violins. As stated by who constructs tonal copies based on fine historic instruments,
the Hills [24], "many points have to be considered: thicknesses, including specimens by Stradivari and Montagnana. He clearly
model, dimensions, wood, and, last but not least, varnish all play recognizes that some violin top plates, such as the "Kreisler" del
their part..." Gesu (Fig. 3), become thinner towards the middle. Modal analysis
allows Schleske to make "resonance sculptures" of fine instruments
Relation to Plate Tuning and Modal Analysis in which differences in materials and varnish are adjusted to obtain
Results about reverse graduation of Cremonese violins are difficult the desired acoustical signatures.
to reconcile with rules developed for free plate tuning [1,2,4].
Thicknesses for most historic top plates are apparently too thin to Possibility of Regraduation and Thinning
attain principal modes at frequencies that have been defined as It is possible that many examples of reverse graduation were caused
favorable. However, data are almost completely lacking on the by regraduation and thinning, years after the violins left their makers'
subject of principal modes of historic instrument plates. Rules for benches, although we have little evidence besides opinions and
Figure 6. Thickness contour maps of the 'Stern' violin (Guarneri del Gesu, 1738 [10]), one of the career violins of American soloist Isaac
Stern. Top plate shows reverse graduation, and back plate shows normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Black dots
indicate locations of measurement points. Contour interval 0.25 mm. Viewed from outside.
Body 352 mm
Upper bouts 164.5 mm Upper bout 163mm
yiddle bouts 119.5 mm Middle bout 119.25 mm
Lower bouts 204 mm Lower bout 202 mm
Arching 14.7 mm Arching 13.0 mm
Rib thickness 1.1-1.2mm Rib thickness 1.1-1.2 mm
anecdotes to support this idea. The idea of regraduation is deeply considerably, making a thickness pattern that works well for a
engrained in the violin literature, for example Weisshaar and particular violin work poorly for an instrument with different
Shipman [26] state that regraduation "must have been done on a arching. Arching and plate thickness both influence plate stiffness.
regular basis, for today we seldom find an instrument which has There is considerable variation in arching heights of historic
not been somewhat altered." They conclude that "detrimental instruments (Table 1), for example, 26 Guarneri del Gesu violin top
changes in graduations were made by irresponsible makers, dealers, plates range from 12.4 to 17.4 mm (aye, 15.4mm), and ten Stradivari
and dilettantes who hoped to improve the sound of instruments by violin top plates range from 14.0 to 18.0mm (aye. 15.9mm). However,
thinning the soundplates." the type of top graduation shows no correlation to arching height.
Also, the argument that archings are significantly different does not
Such reports are countered by the fact that several reverse-graduated recognize Playfair's investigations of arching shapes [27, and this
instruments (including Stradivari's 'Muir-Mackenzie', 'Messiah,' issue], which conclude that many Cremonese instruments follow
and del Gesu's "Soil" and "Alard") are some of the best-preserved the same family of mathematical curves (Note: we were able to
examples of classic Cremonese violins. However, regardless of verify Playfair's findings in our own investigations of Cremonese
who did the graduating or when it was done, reverse graduated violins).
violins dominate the modern concert stage.
Normal Graduation in Post-Golden Age Violins
Influence of Arching The violin graduation database suggests that normal graduation
Another consideration is that the arching shapes might vary becomes the rule, rather than the exception, in instruments made
Figure 7. Thickness graduation maps of a fine concert violin by Carlo Bergonzi, 1732, the career violin of an American soloist
(instrument name withheld by request). Top plate shows reverse graduation with a strong longitudinal trough, and back plate shows
normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Measurements are shown in millimeters (contour interval 0.25 mm).
Number Insufficient
Maker Name Plates Normal Reverse Undefined Dat
Andrea Amati 3 1 0 1 1
Brothers Amati 3 1 1 1 0
Nicolo Amati 8 4 2 1 1
Carlo Bergonzi 3 0 2 0 1
Guarneri del Gesu 38 3 27 8 0
Guarneri del Gesu & 1 0 0 1 0
Joseph fikus Andrea
Joseph Guarneri fikus 4 0 3 1 0
Andrea
Francesco Ruggieri 1 0 0 1 0
Antonio Stradivari 43 0 26 11 6
Francesco Stradivari 1 0 1 0 0
Totals 105 9 62 24
Percent 100 9 60
Figure 8. Thickness graduation maps of the 'Harrison' violin, Antonio Stradivari, 1693 [11]. Top plate shows reverse graduation, and
back plate shows normal graduation. Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Measurements are shown in millimeters (contour
interval 0.25 mm). Viewed from outside.
Body 361.5 mm
Upper bouts 161.7 mm
Middle bouts 109 mm
Upper bouts 161.5 mm
Lower bouts 202.3 mm
spacing 40 mm Middle bouts 108.4 mm
Lower bouts 202.5 mm
Arching 15.5 mm
Arching 15.1 mm
Rib height 30.4-31.6 mm
Two-piece quarter maple
Rib thickness <1.0 mm
Weight 386
after the Golden Age ended in about 1750. Good examples are the difficult to argue with both acoustical success and high instrument
Gagliano family (Naples, Italy), other Italian makers (e.g. C.F. values. Perhaps we should reevaluate the idea that thin top plates
Landolfi, G.B. Gabbrielli, L. Storioni, A. Gragnani, G.B. Ceruti, N. are predestined to be acoustically and structurally unsuccessful.
Bergonzi, P. Pallotta, P. Mantegazza, G. Rocca, G. Fiorini, S.
Scarampella, R. Antoniazzi, C.C. Bruno, P. Badalassi, G. Ornati, The most surprising finding of this study is that little support could
and F. Garimberti; Fig. 9), and various German makers (e.g. L. be found for the concept of "normal" graduation, as recommended
Maussiel, J.G. Meisel, Georg Klotz, J.G. Voigt, J.G. Hamm, and by violin making schools, books, and articles, and exemplified by
Mathais Hornsteiner). del Gesu's "Canon". Only nine (9%) of 105 Golden Age plates are
classified as normally graduated, whereas 62 (60%) are classified as
CONCLUSION reverse graduated. One could argue that many of the reverse
The purpose of this article is to shed some light on the shady topic graduated plates are the result of regraduation, which may be true
of the modern configurations of Cremonese violin plates. Spruce but is acoustically irrelevant. If we want to learn something about
soundboards of many of the world's best Cremonese concert violins instrument acoustics, we should focus on current configurations of
from the Golden Age are shaped opposite the way that modern extant Golden Age concert violins, which have been carefully chosen
violin makers are taught to carve their tops. Rather than swelling to for their remarkable abilities to sing in the hands of the world's best
greater thickness in the center between the ff-holes, the top plate players. These violins are quite unlike the Canon, and appear to
pinches down to minimum thickness in this area. Despite the fact have different characteristics of weight, mass loading, flexibility,
that these instruments break many of our modern-day rules, it is and plate tuning frequencies.
Figure 9. Thickness graduation map of a violin by Ferdinando Garimberti, Milan, 1967. Top and back plates show normal graduation
patterns.Measured with magnetic thickness gauge. Measurements are shown in millimeters (contour interval 0.25 mm). Viewed from
outside.
Body 353.5 mm
Body 355.0 mm
Upper bouts 169.0 mm
Upper bouts 169.0 mm
Middle bouts 115.5 mm
Lower bouts 209.0 mm Middle bouts 114.5 mm
Lower bouts 209.0 mm
Arching 15.9 mm
Rib thickness 1.0-1.1 mm Arching 15.6 mm
Two-piece quarter maple
Finally, I should state that I favor conservatism with regard to making [2] Brown, E.S., and Campbell, E.C., 1990, Chimneys violin
new instruments, and I do not recommend that modern makers maker's workshop, Book II: Edward C. Campbell, Boiling
reverse graduate their plates without experimental verification of Springs, PA, 48 p.
the acoustical virtues of thin plates. [3] Strobel, H.A., 1997, Violin making, Step by step (second
edition): Henry A. Strobel, Aumsville, OR, 78 p.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS [4] Johnson, C, and Courtnall, R, 2000, The art of violin making:
I thank the Smithsonian Institution, National Music Museum, U.S. Robert Hale, London, 253 p.
Library of Congress, and Metropolitan Museum of Artfor access to files [5] Loen, J.S., 2001, Thickness graduation mapping: Methods &
and instrument collections. Data contributors are thanked for their goals: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 4, no. 4 (Series II), p. 5-
generosity. 6.
[6] Loen, J. S., 2001, Thickness graduation systems ofviolin family
REFERENCES instruments: Preliminary statistics and conclusions: Catgut
[1] Hutchins, CM., 1983, Plate toning for the violin maker: Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 4, no. 4 (Series II), p. 42-44.
Acoust. Society Newsletter no. 39, p. 25-32.
[7] Loen, J.S., and King, A.T., 2002, Thick and thin: The Strad, [20] Zimin, P., 1926, A uniform system for the measurement of the
December 2002, vol. 113, no. 1352,p. 1354-1359. thicknesses of the plates of bowed stringed instruments (see
[8] S.F., 1979, The "secrets" of Stradivari: Libreria del Vigdorchik, 1982).
Convegno, 285 p. [21] Chaudiere, F., 2002, Silent witness: The Strad, published by
[9] The Strad poster series, Orpheus Publications, London. Orpheus Publications, London, vol. 113, no. 1346, June 2002,
[10] Biddulph, P., Carlo C, Dilworth, J., Hargrave, R, Klein, P., p. 618-625.
Pollens, S., Rosengard, D., and Wen, E., 1998, Giuseppe [22] Giordano, A., 1995, The Cannon and typical features of
Guarneri del Gesu: Peter Biddulph, London, 339 p. Guarneri's instruments: in Paganini's violin: Dynamic Sri,
[11] National Music Museum, Vermillion, S.D. Italy, 105 p.
[12] U.S. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. [23] Vigdorchik, 1., 1982, The acoustical systems of violins of
[13] Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, England. Stradivarius and other Cremona makers: Bradenton, Florida,
[14] Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 169p.
[15] Vitachek, E., 1926, Thicknesses and their distribution on the [24] Hill, W.H., Hill, A.F., and Hill,A.E., 1963, Antonio Stradivari:
top and back of instruments of the ancient craftsmen: Russian His life & work (1644-1737), New York, Dover Publications,
Commission on Musical Instrument Making: State Institute Inc., 31 5 p.
of Musical Science (GIMN). Reprinted in 1952 as "Essays on [25] Schleske, M., 2002, Emprical tools in violin making (Part I):
the history of bow instrument making". Analysis of design, material, varnish, and normal modes:
[1 6] Goodkind, H., 1972, Violin iconography ofAntonio Stradivari, Catgut Acoust. Soc. Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 50-63.
1644-1737: New York, 780 p. [26] Weisshaar, H, and Shipman, M., 1988, Violin restoration: A
[17] "Strumenti di Antonio Stradivari" (1991), Ente Triennale manual for violin makers: Weisshaar-Shipman, Los Angeles,
Interazionale Degli Strumenti ad Arco. CA, 261 p.
[18] Carlson, B. (cd.), 2001, Antonio Stradivari, Violino 1716, [27] Playfair, Q., 1999, Cremona's forgotten curve: The Strad,
Mediceo: Cremonabooks S.r.L, Italy. Orpheus publications, London, vol. 110, no. 1315, Nov. 1999,
[19] Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. p. 1194-1199.
The Witten-Rawlins collection of northern Italian string Collection in London, England. The violin appears to have been
instruments at the National Music Museum in Vermillion, South actively played for part of its history, based on erosion at the bridge
Dakota includes a disassembled violin made in Cremona, Italy by location.
Hieronymus Amati in 1604. The violin (no. 3423) is small size
(body length 341 mm) and includes top, back, and rib garland (neck The top plate (Fig. 1) is made of two pieces of spruce that appear not
is absent). Examination of these parts is instructive regarding wood to match. It weighs 46 g, withoutbass bar, and the maximumarching
preference, design, dimensions, weight, and free plate tap-tones for height is about 20.0 mm (18-19 mm if adjusted for plate warpage).
a 400-year old Cremonese violin. The label reads "Hieronymus Basic dimensions are as follows: body, 340.5 mm; mensur, 190 mm;
Amatus Cremonen Andreae fil. F. 1604". No information is upper bouts, 156 mm; middle bouts, 103.3 mm; and lower bouts,
available about the acoustical quality of violin, or the names of 188.5 mm. The ff-holes are 73-74 mm long and the upper holes are
previous owners, besides having once been in the E.M.W. Paul spaced 34.8 mm apart. All edges are doubled and numerous cracks
Figure 1. Top plate of violin by Hieronymus Amati, Cremona, Italy, 1604. Left shows photo of outside of free plate, right shows thickness
graduation map (thickness in millimeters; contour interVal 0.25 mm)
are present. Purfling is about 1.55 mm wide, and is situated 3.5 mm cycloid templates that the arching conforms to this family of curves.
from the edges. We measured tap tones (although they may not be The thickness pattern is concentric, with a maximum value of 4.3
meaningful because of the cracks): Mode I, D-Eb (73-78 Hz); Mode mm located near the 50% point (171 mm from bottom edge) of the
11, C-C# (131-139 Hz). The plate is too fragile to obtainmode V, the back plate, coinciding with a small pinhole. The upper and lower
ring mode. The thickness graduation pattern of the top plate includes bouts have large thin (1.05-1.7 mm) areas, with a minimumvalue of
large areas that are extremely thin (1.0-2.1 mm). Minimum values 1.05mm in the upper right quadrant. Edges range from 3.25-3.5 mm
of 1.0 mm occur between the ff-holes, and slightly below the middle in the upper and lower bouts, to 4.0-4.1 mm in the middlebouts, and
bouts. Thicker areas (>2.5 mm) occur between the middle bout overhang is 2.5 mm
edges and the ff-holes, and at the upper block location. The
maximum thickness of 3.3 mm is at the upper block location. We The rib garland weighs 31 g. Rib heights are 25.6-27.7 mm and rib
have no indication of whether these are original or modified thickness is 0.9-1.1 mm. The lower rib is one piece. The lower
graduations. block, made of willow, is 52.2 mm wide and 12.5 mm deep. The
upper block is 56 mm wide and 15 mm deep. Corner blocks are
The back plate (Fig. 2) is made of two pieces of maple cut almost on also made of willow, and their lengths are 19.75 mm (upper) and 21
quarter. The two-piece back is joined such that the flames have a mm (lower). Willow linings are 5 mm high and about 1.6mm wide.
consistent slant upward from the treble side to the bass, resembling The linings on the middle bouts are not inserted into the blocks, but
a one piece back in appearance. The plate weighs 82 gm and the are merely butted up to the blocks.
maximum arching height is 15.5 mm. Basic dimensions are as
follows: body, 341.0 mm; upper bouts, 156 mm; middle bouts, 106 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
mm; and lower bouts, 195 mm. Modes I, 11, and V are estimated at We thank Dr. Andre Earson, Director of the NationalMusic Museum,
112, 133, and 350 Hz. We confirmed to our satisfaction using curtate for access to the collection and permission to present our results in CAS].
Figure 2. Back plate of violin by Hieronymus Amati, Italy, 1604. Left shows photo of outside of free plate, right shows
thickness graduation map (thickness in millimeters; contour interval 0.25 mm)
Eric Meyer
6837 N.E. Alameda Drive, Portland, OR 97213 USA
[email protected]
Figure 6. Ebony tailpieces at the National Music Museum. Left Figure 7. Pegs in different stages of completion, reputed to be
tailpiece is early example of the "rooftop" design. Right tailpiece from Stradivarius shop (Stradivari Museum, Cremona). A) View of
has modern keyhole-type slots but lacks a modern-style attachment set of eleven pegs. Right three pegs are round, as if directly from
system and saddle, indicating that development of tailpieces was lathe. Two on left have been filed to finished head thickness and the
not linear. Note variety of attachment mechanisms. The first two central group has been sawed flat but not finished to final thickness.
are earlier gut loop types, but the first is sunken, to avoid abrasion. Note rectangular, tapered ends remaining on pegs 4-6 from right.
Both theroof top style and the sunken loopholes are evolved features This implies the use of a collet with a rectangular tapered hole for
but the squared bottom is not. torque at the headstock; B) Oblique view from a different angle.
C) Close-up of five pegs in center of fig. 7A. Note saw marks on
faces of left three pegs. Wood appears to be Zisiphus (guigolo) [3].
A.
Figure 8. Violin pegs in the Schreinzer collection. A) Violin pegs. Figure 9. Tailpieces from the Schreinzer collection, Germanische
Attached labels from left say "Joh. Jos. Stadlmann, 1750(?)", museum (note different scales). A) Photo ofinside of simple early
"englishe", and "FridoliKama". Stadlmann (1720-1781) was a violin tailpiece. Writing appears to say "Beethoven yon". Metal attachment
maker in Vienna [7]. B) Labels from left say "Salzbg", Joh. Jos. connects to top plate as seen in Figure 2 B) Early tailpieces with
Stadlmann, 1767", "aus Mailand yon", and "(unintelligible) Mailand". scalloped upper end (note black dye worn off left tailpiece). First
C) Label on left says "Joh. Christ. Leidolff 1758". Johann Christoph tailpiece uses metal the same way gut would be tied. C) Variety of
Leidolff (1690-1758) was a violin maker in Vienna [7]. Some of the early tailpieces, some are ebony and some are dyed (notice wear on
pegs in the collection were identified with labels that only signified third).
names of cities or countries, such as "englishe", "beljique" or
"Salzbg' (most probably Salzburg), highlighting the regional nature
of early peg designs. Woods appear to be mostly boxwood. First A. B.
peg in B is ebony; other darker pegs may be plum or other
fruitwoods. Fourth peg in A. could be pernambuco.
A.
B.
C.
"but of a sort especially black and therefore softer" [B]. This modification of simple string holes into slotted "keyhole" shapes,
Mauritius ebony supply was quickly exhausted. I have seen early the addition of a raised ridge to support strings after emerging from
pegs made from other woods, notably rosewood and hornbeam, the holes at the top of the tailpiece, and the evolution of the system
but I have been unable to confirm their species. The set of pegs at that suspended tailpiece from end button. Originally tailpieces had
the National Music Museum that first piqued my historical simple holes to anchor the strings (Figs. 2, 4, 9A). Changes in string
imagination (Fig. SE) appeared to me to be made from pernambuco. technology and tension required slots for the string ends. Knots
strong enough to hold the tension made changing broken strings
Tuning Peg Designs and Trends much easier, especially during a performance. The musician could
Unlike the several classic peg head shapes that are mostly mass- drop theknotted end through the hole in the top of the tailpiece and
produced today, the early pegs covered the gamut of shapes. Overall cinch it into the slot—a much quicker and easier procedure than
the heads appear harder edged, with more pointed corners and tying them.
steeper peg shaft tapers than modern, ones. The plethora of designs
is mirrored in the many shapes and types of instruments developed Raised bars of wood or bone were added for the strings to rest on as
and played. Accordingly, it is the obscure and less successful they emerged from the tailpiece. I have seen tailpieces with this
instruments, such as the viols and dance-master's kits, which seem ridge or "saddle" carved from the tailpiece material itself, but mostly
to afford the best view of what original pegs lookedlike. Since these this change was accomplished by a separate piece of inlayed wood.
instruments were in vogue for a shorter period, their pegs were
replaced less often. The two simple holes that held the loop of gut at the other end
originally allowed the gut to sit above the surface of the wood. This
As evolution ofviolins progressed pegs turners tended to use harder must have been both uncomfortable and dangerous in the days
woods, which became more available and less expensiveas advances before chinrest development. Acidic sweat eventually weakens
in transportation made the world smaller. I previously postulated natural gut. Sudden breakage can harm both the player and the
that pips were originally used to hide the dimple caused by the instrument. A depression was carved into the top of the tailpiece
lathe tailstock. Another explanation was suggested to me by Andrew that held this loop below the surface level in an intermediateremedy.
Dipper, restoration expert and instrument historian. Most early In Germany, at least, for a time in the 19th Century this connection
instruments were tuned using a ratchet-like tool called a was bridged by rigid metal wire that was fixed to a plate inlayed in
tournegauche, which fit over the peg head. The pip may have kept the top of the tailpiece. Adjusting the distance from the bridge to
the peg centered in this device to facilitate tuning. As time the tailpiece is difficult with this system but sound quality may
progressed, heads became less decorative and more comfortable to have been improved. Local cello makers in Nuremberg even sunk
the fingers. A notable exception is the übiquitous heart shaped peg metal, right-angled flanges into the end block of the instruments on
th
that was made famous by W.E. Hill and Sons at the end of the 19 to which the tailpieces were riveted. Eventually the modern system
Century. The shaft taper decreasedfrom 1/20 to 1/30. This may be of attachment developedrequiring a thicker piece of wood to allow
explained by the standardization of machine tapers and chucks, or for a niche carved into the underside of the tailpiece, which held the
the use of harder woods, which need less taper to impede their knots in the end of the tail gut.
travel through the two holes in the peg box.
Early tombstone shaped tailpieces, plain or decorated (Figure 2, 4
Tailpiece Woods and 9A), became streamlined with an accentuated waist and more
Early tailpieces were commonly made of maple and other light graceful curves. The top profile became rounder to mirror the shape
colored woods, sometimes dyed black [9]. However, ebony came of the top of the bridge. One early tailpiece in the National Music
into use by around 1800, at least partly because musicians objected museum collection (Fig. 6, left) has the rooftop style generally
associated with the Hill tailpiece of the early 20th Century, yet still REFERENCES
has the square bottom and simple tail gut holes of the early period. [1] Schuback, P., 1999, and Meyer, E., The relationship of fittings
Many of the Germanic tailpieces that I saw in Nuremberg were and tone: Violin Society of America Journal, p. 109-146
scalloped or "shield" shaped above the nut. It appeared to me that [2] Boyden, D.D., 1969, Catalogue of the Hill collection of musical
the makers were relying on the shape to decorate the work, as instruments in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford: London,
opposed to the fanciful puffing designs that we see on earlier Oxford University Press, 54 p.
examples. It is difficult to posit a time line for these changes due to [3] http://chemserv.o.pph.univie.ac.at/ska/ziplant.htm
the lack of records. As with pegs, tailpiece shapes evolved from [4] Sacconi, S.F., 1979, The 'secrets' of Stradivari: Cremona,
many fanciful and different designs to the few classical shapes we Libreria del Convegno, 284 p.
find commercially available today. Gut has been replaced by [5] Hill, W.H., Hill, A.F., and Hill, A.E., 1963, Antonio Stradivari:
threaded nylon, although some modern tailpiece makers use metal His life & work (1644-1737), New York, Dover Publications,
wire as the tailpiece connection. Some modern makers have reverted Inc., 315 p.
to gut for acoustical reasons. [6] Sherrington, U., and Oldham, G.(eds), 1961, Music, libraries
and instruments (Hinrichsen's Eleventh Music Book: papers
CONCLUSIONS read at the Joint Congress, Cambridge, 1959, of the lAML and
Little is recorded about the history of this aesthetic and functional the Galpin Society. London, Bach House.
part of the anatomy of the violin family. Perhaps the oversight has [7] Henley, W., 1973, Universal dictionary of violin and bow
to do with the perception of fittings as "used tires" that we wear out makers: Amati Publishing Kent, 1268 p.
and replace. For some time they have been made in factories and [8] Dipper, A., and Woodrow, D., 1987, Count Ignazio Alessandro
sold through catalogues, which has only increased this lack ofrespect. Cozio di Salabue: Observations on the construction of stringed
It is hard to know who made the early fittings, whether they were a instruments and their adjustment 1804, 1805, 1809, 1810, 1816:
specialized group of artisans or the luthiers and apprentices. As Redwood Burn Limited, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, 85 p.
with the rest of our endeavors to push musical instruments towards [9] http: //www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/1/
that last percentage of quality in sound and function, we can learn logwoo39.html
something from these artisans of the past. [10] http://www.publicbookshelf.com/public_html/
The_Household_Cyclopedia_of_General_lnformation/
wooddyes_cbh.html
ABSTRACT York in 1994 [3]. I rejected personal notes and outlines because I
The possibility that arching patterns of Cremonese violins, violas, wanted my arguments based on commonly accessible materials. A
and cellos conform to curtate cycloid curves is considered in light common style emerged for cross-archings [4], although I found no
of the familiarity of Renaissance and Baroque mathematicians and solution for the longitudinal arch. Clearly, the exact way the
artisans with the curve, close matches obtainable with old arching system was used varied from maker to maker. It should be
instruments, and the simplicity and elegance that seem to be the stressed that what I noticed was far more of an observation than a
hallmark of Cremonese work. Ideal curate cycloid curves produced solution— although it seems to work well to my eye, it is open to
by a computer program are compared with cross-arching profiles evaluation by a wider public. Above all, I would like to avoid any
of seven important Cremonese instruments. A visual comparison link with ancient "secrets". Mysterious parchments and malodorous
suggests in most cases a favorable correlation, although it should be compounds gratify modern appetites for quick solutions to complex
acknowledged that correlation does not necessarily indicate cause problems. However, I do not think that they help us reconstruct the
and effect, and there is no written evidence proving that Cremonese working methods of the violin makers of 17th century Cremona.
makers used curtate cycloid curves.
GEOMETRY OF CYCLOID CURVES
INTRODUCTION There are three kinds of cycloid curves, if we confine ourselves to
If we approach the great Cremonese violin makers with a view to the path traced by a point along the radius of a circle rolling along
investigating their similarities, rather than their differences, it a flat surface: the pure cycloid, the curtate cycloid, and the prolate
becomes increasingly clear that a common system of design is cycloid. These can all be expressed as the locus of a point P, at a
evident from Andrea Amati to Guarneri del Gesu. It does not distance h from the centre of a circle whose radius is a, and whose
dominate the individual style of the maker, but it does provide
some insight into the basic framework that wouldhave been taught
to a 1 7th century apprentice. The corners of a Cremonese violin, for Figure 1. Geometrical variables of the cycloid curve. Oocenter
example, will all fit on a circle whose centre is the mid-point of the of circle; P=point used to draw curve; h=distance from O to P;
instrument. This does not impose uniformity, but it does contribute a=radius of circle.
towards a family likeness. Likewise, for all the variety of ff-holes,
the distance between the centers of the upper and lower holes is a
predictable 63-64 mm on a full-size violin. That, it seems, is how it
was done, and I am still waiting to see a significant variation. Of
course, having measured and pierced the initial holes for the ffs,
personal taste could, and did, take over. The Cremonese makers
seem to have hit on the perfect balance between formal structure
and individual expression, and I feel that if we could understand
and apply the original system of design we would be better off than
we are in our present position, where we often copy instruments
without grasping the frame of thought behind them.
Playfair — Curtate Cycloid Arching in Golden Age Cremonese Violin Family Instruments
centre is at O (Fig. 1). The varying angle of the line OP in relation to of string. It is also possible to scribe a series of elegant shapes using
the fiat surface on which the wheel moves is represented by t. a wheel — these shapes being known to geometricians as cycloids.
Starting with the least interesting (at least, to violin makers), we can
Thus: x=at-h sin(t) roll a wheel along a straight line, while tracing the path of a point on
y=a-h cos(t) the perimeter (Fig. 2A). However, curves familiar to the violin-
When h=a, the result is a pure cycloid. maker emerge when the tracing point is moved in from the perimeter
When h<a the result is a curtate ("curtate" is Latin for "short) of the wheel (Fig. 2B).
cycloid.
When h>a the result is a prolate ("prolate" is Latin for "extended") The shape of the curtate cycloid curve shown in Figure 2B is defined
cycloid (a curve with loops, technically called cusps). by two factors: the size of the wheel, whose circumference defines
the period of the curve, and the distance of the tracing point from
The cycloid curve is also known as a trochoid or roulette, although the center of the wheel, which varies the height of the curve. Figure
this is not strictly accurate, since a trochoid is specifically either a 3 illustrates how variations in wheel size and tracing point location
prolate or curtate cycloid, and roulette refers to all curves created affect the character of the resulting curtate cycloid curves.
by moving circles, be those circles moved against a flat or curved
surface. However, the terms are often used loosely, a problem which Two dimensions, then, are needed: the horizontal width, and the
is complicated by the general non-mathematicalreference works, vertical height of the arch itself. A downloadable program on the
which have based their definitions on the complete Oxford English Internet [6] will print curtate cycloids in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format
Dictionary, or the Encyclopedia Britannica, both of which got their based on these two figures (Fig. 4). However, it is also easy to use
definitions identically muddled a hundred years ago. This allows wheels. I used V. inch plywood, and a hole cutter. The hole cutter is
the curious reader to follow a chain of plagiarism right through to adjusted to produce a circle whose circumference is the desired
Microsoft Encarta. For accurate information on this family of distance between the two low points. (Circumference/
curves, I recommend the St. Andrews University mathematics site 3.l4=diameter). The height of the arching is obtained by drilling a
[5]- hole Vz the desired distance from the centre. In practical terms, I cut
the wheels slightly small, and put an elastic band around them. I
DRAWING CURTATE CYCLOID CURVES also glued 80 grit sandpaper to a length of Vz inch plywood, which
Many traditional ways of drawing geometric shapes have been used I used as a straightedge to roll the wheels along. In this way, the
over the years by woodworkers, stonemasons and others. Apart problem of slippage is reduced.
from the obvious straight line and circle, ellipses and even ovoids
are possible using nothing more than a couple of nails and a length
Figure 3. Variations in curtate cycloid curves depending on wheel
size and tracing point location. In the examples shown, the highest
Figure 2. Cycloid curves. arching (middle) is made by a small wheel with a large tracing
A. A simple cycloid curve is traced by a point located on the edge point distance, whereas flatter arching (bottom) is defined by a
of a turning circle. larger wheel with a smaller distance.
B. Curtate cycloid curve. The curve is traced by a tracing point
located within a turning circle.
Two things must be borne in mind when drawing curtate cycloids. shows back cross-archings that conform fairly well to cycoid curves
First, the arches produced are external. Generally, when we talk of (Fig. 7). Variations occur in the starting points of cycloid curves for
a violin with 16 mm arching, we are including the thickness of the the back plate, from near the edge in the upper, middle, and lower
wood. Assuming that the wood at the lowest point is 3 mm thick, bouts to far within the purfling line at the upper and lower corners.
the external arch is 13 mm, since that is the distance that it rises This sort of variation in low point location is typical.
from the lowest point to the center. Second, the lowest point of the
arching curve is not necessarily identical with the purfling, and the The violino piccolo made in 1613 by Hieronymus and Antonio
position of the low point affects the overall appearance of the Amati is an exceptional example of an early Cremonese instrument
instrument. A low point positioned near the plate edge causes the in unmodified condition. The original finish is intact and the arching
appearance of low, full arching (Fig. 5), whereas a low point shows little, if any, distortion (Fig. 8). Arching templates conform
positioned further in from the edge causes the appearance of higher, approximately to the arching (Fig. 9), showing low points near or
steeper arching (Fig. 6). It is easy to characterize an instrument as inside the purfling line for some profiles, and near the edge for
highly arched when in fact it is no higher than one having arching others. On the top plate, the same cycloid template (98,6.4) appears
that starts near the purfling, and whose contours are more gradual. to fit both the upper corner and the lower corner profiles, raising
the possibility that the same template had been used for both
COMPARATIVE CURVES profiles.
If the idea that Cremonese makers used curtate cycloid curves for
their cross-archings is to have any credibility, two things must be The back plate ofNicolo Amati's "Alard" violin of 1649 shows a
demonstrated: First, it must be shown that cross-archings on existing reasonable correlation with curtate cycloid templates (Fig. 10). Low
historic instruments are reasonable matches with wheel- or points are positioned well within the purfling line, giving the visual
computer-generated curves. Secondly, it must be established that impression of steep, high arching (e.g. Fig. 6).
th
16th and 17 century Europeans were familiar with the cycloid
family of curves. Andrea Guarneri's tenor viola of 1664 (Fig. 11) shows considerable
variation in the position of the low point, from near the edge in the
CROSS-ARCHING PROFILES middle bout of the table, to near the purfling line in the bouts, and
Cross-archings from a variety of Cremonese instruments can easily far within the plate margins in the upper and lower corner profiles
be compared with ideal curves produced by a wheel, or, in this (Fig. 12).
case, by computer [6]. Cycloid curves were overlaid on the cross-
archings of seven well-known instruments (1 violino piccolo, 3 Antonio Stradivari's "Archinto" viola of 1696 (Fig. 13) shows high,
violins, 2 violas, and 1 cello; table 1). Curves are presented as half robust arching with a consistent location of the low point within
templates, as would probably have been used by makers. For the purfling line.
example, Hargrave suggests that half templates were used on
Guarneri del Gesu's violins (See [3], vol. 2, p. 145). In contrast, Joseph filius Andrea Guarneri's c.1705 violin (Fig. 14)
shows considerable variation in the position of the low point, from
Most cycloid curves (shown starting in Fig. 7 using a heavy dashed far within the plate margins, to outside of the plate edge.
line) show a reasonable fit, especially considering that many plates
have distorted with age. The only exceptions that I can find are in Finally, in del Gesu's "Canon" violin of 1743 (Fig. 15), cycloid
the bridge area of tables, where a different, barrel—like shape seems templates project to the edges in the middle bouts, whereas the low
to predominate. points are farther within the plates in the upper and lower bouts.
The famous "King" cello of 1572, one of the set of decorated In summary, reasonable visual correlations are obtained for curtate
instruments that Andrea Amati made for Charles IX of France, cycloid templates superimposed on cross arching profiles of seven
Cremonese instruments. Variations are what might be expected
from differences in the original use of half templates, combined
Figure 4. Ideal curtate cycloid curve generated by computer with distortions caused over time. These half dozen examples are
program "Cycloid" [6]. User specifies width (W) between low
simply for illustration. Most, if not all, Cremonese instruments
points, and height (h) of curve. Horizontal line spacing is 10 mm. that I have tested seem to fit these cycloid templates, at least to my
satisfaction.
HISTORY
Most people subscribe to the snowball theory of knowledge that —
we becomebetter informed as time goes by, and moreis discovered.
W=1 30,00, h=10,50 Violin makers especially, have a hard time with such a concept,
Figure 5. End views of arching on a viola made by Peregrino di Zanetto, Brescia, after 1564 (left, top plate; right, treble side of back plate).
The arching extends to edges of the plates, producing distinctive "full" character (photo by A.T. King; NationalMusic Museum, no. 3367).
Figure 6. End views of arching on a violin made by Nicolo Amati, 1628. The low point of the arching is inside the purfling line, which
results in a fairly steep visual impression (photo by A.T. King; National Music Museum, no. 3356).
since we are routinely humiliated in our attempts to equal, let alone heavenly bodies moved in epicycloids, which derive from the path
exceed, objects made three hundred years ago. I suspect that the of a wheel moving over a surface that is also curved. Over the
truth is that while our libraries may bulge with an accumulation of centuries, it became necessary to modify Ptolemy's system to bring
knowledge, our minds remain confined to those areas that help us it into conformity with the growing body of observed -information,
in the present. The fact that cycloid curves remain almost unknown but the basic principle was never challenged, especially after it had
and untaught today does not mean that this has always been the been absorbed by the Church, which made its position almost
case. There is no need to construct elaborate arguments as to how unassailable. The cycloid-based movement of the universe would
an obscure geometric construction came to the notice of ordinary have been as routine in Medieval and Renaissance education as the
17th century craftsmen. The construction of cycloid curves had been elliptical shape of an orbiting body is in ours.
common knowledge for centuries, and, at the time of the flowering
of the Cremonese^violin trade, was the subject of intense The successful mathematical analysis of cycloids did not occur until
mathematical investigation. the 17th century. Quite simply, a sufficient mathematical foundation
had not yet been generated. This does not mean that the subject was
It is uncertain whether the first discussion of cycloids was Greek, not of interest. Cardinal Nicolas of Cusa attempted the discovery of a
Arabic, or from further east. However, there is no doubt that formula in 1451, and in Germany the artist Albrecht Durer (1471-1528)
Ptolemy was the first to incorporate the construction into a major included cycloids in the book he wrote in the last years of his life in
work. In the 2nd century he developed a cosmic system that was to — —
which he explored the relationship critical, in his view between
last for 1300 years. He proposed a geocentric universe in which the geometry and success in craftsmanship and art [7].
Table 1. Dimensions of curtate cycloid templates used to test cross-archings of Cremonese instruments. All dimensions are given in
millimeters. Width and height of curtate cycloid templates (see Fig. 4) are given as "width, height". Templates were made using
computer program "Cycloid" [6].
Plate Length Upper Bouts Upper Corners Middle Bouts Lower Corners Lower Bouts
Figure 7. Comparison of curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for the "King" cello, Andrea Amati, 1572
(cross archings from technical drawing by John Pringle; used with permission of National Music Museum; shaded area indicates
instrument plate). Scale is different for bottom, left profile. W and H refer to width and height of cycloid template. Cycloid curves are
positioned slightly above cross-arching line. Light vertical and horizontal lines are frames for cycloid curve (see Fig. 4); horizontal lines
are 10 mm apart.
Andrea Amati "King" cello, 1572
Andrea Amati "King" cello, 1572 Back plate
Table
Figure 8. Neck views of curtate cycloid arching on a violino piccolo made by the Brothers Amati, 1613 (A.T. King photo; National Music
Museum, no. 3361)
Figure 9. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for the violino piccolo, Brothers
Amati, 1613 (cross archings from technical drawing by John Pringle; used with permission of National Music Museum; shaded area
indicates instrument plate). See Fig. 7 caption for full explanation.
Galileo [8] may have played a major role in destroying the Ptolemaic
system, but he was fascinated by the cycloid, which in 1599 he gave
its modern name (cycloid: "based on the circle, or the wheel"). He Figure 10. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates
failed to produce a formula for the shape, but did suggest that a (dashed lines) with cross-archings for the "Alard" violin, Nicolo
Amati, 1649 (cross archings from Strad poster series; used with
cycloid would make an efficient basis for a bridge arch, which was
in fact carried out in the construction of the Ponte di Mezzo over permission; shaded area indicates instrument plate). See Fig. 7
the Arno River in Florence, some time after his death in 1642. caption for full explanation.
Figure 11. End views of curtate cycloid arching on a tenor viola made by Andrea 1664 (A.T. King photo; National Music
Museum, no. 3354).
Figure 12. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for tenor viola, Andrea
Guarneri, 1664 (cross archings from technical drawing by John Pringle; used with permission of National Music Museum; shaded
area indicates instrument plate). See Fig. 7 caption for full explanation.
Figure 13. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for the "Archinto" viola, Antonio
Stradivari, 1696 (cross archings from Strad poster series; used with permission; shaded area indicates instrument plate). See Fig. 7 caption
for full explanation.
Figure 14. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for a violin by Joseph Guarneri
filius Andrea, c. 1705 (cross archings from Strad poster series; used with permission; shaded area indicates instrument plate). See Fig. 7
caption for full explanation.
Figure 15. Comparison of ideal curtate cycloid arching templates (dashed lines) with cross-archings for the "Canon" violin, Guarneri
del 1743 (cross archings from Strad poster series; used with permission; shaded area indicates instrument plate).
is risky, to say the least. In its favor are the close matches obtainable [6] 'Cycloid' computer program, written by Stephen Mann for
with old instruments, and the simplicity and elegance that seem to Quentin Playfair. Free download available from http://
be the hallmark of Cremonesework. Against it is the fact that there www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~smann/ccycloid/
seems to be no written evidence to support my claim. As such, it [7] Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1911, 1978, Articles on Cycloids,
must remain a hypothesis, although I like to think of it as a feasible Pascal, Durer, and Wren.
and useful one, and well in accord with Cremonese tradition. [8] Boyer, 1967, Galileo's place in the history of
mathematics: Galileo, Man of Science, edited by McMullin,
in
E.: New York, Basic Books, p. 232-255.
REFERENCES CITED [9] Huygens, Horologium oscillatorium (Paris, 1673), trans.
[1] Orpheus publications, Strad poster series. Available from Richard J. Blackwell, Christiaan Huygens' The Pendulum
www.thestrad.com/ Clock or Geometrical Demonstration Concerning the Motion
[2] Pringle, J., Technical drawings of stringed instruments at the of Pendula as Applied to Clocks (Iowa State Press, 1983); for
National Music Museum, Vermillion, South Dakota, available an edition and translation of the Horologium of 1658, see
from http://www.usd.edu/smm/giftshop.html#drawing Ernest L. Edwardes, The Story of the Pendulum Clock
[3] Biddulph, P., Carlo C, Dilworth, J., Hargrave, R., Klein, P., (Altrincham, 1977), p. 60-97
Pollens, S., Rosengard, D., and Wen, E., 1998, Giuseppe [10] Pigoli, T., 1984, Evoluzione delle curve di bombatura:Liuteria,
Guarneri del Gesu: Peter Biddulph, London, 339 p. no. 10, April, 1984.
[4] Playfair, Q., 1999, Cremona's forgotten curve: The Strad,
Orpheus publications, London, vol. 110, no. 1315, Nov. 1999,
p. 1194-1199. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES
[5] University of St. Andrews, History of Mathematics (Note: Camus, C, 1733, Sur la figure des Dents des Roues, & des Ailes des
one of the best web sites I have come across in any area): Pignons, pour rendre les Horloges plus parfaites: Histoires et
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/ memoires de l'Academie des Paris.
Farouki, R.T., and Rampersad, J., 1998, Cycles upon cycles: An My thanks to Roger Hargravefor his permission to use archingprofiles
anecdotal history of higher curves in science and engineering: published in "The Strad", and the Guarneri book, which were the reason
Mathematical methods for curves and surfaces II (M. Daehlen, I started to think in terms of a Cremonese family likeness in the
first
T. Lyche, and L. L. Schumaker, eds.), Vanderbilt Univ. Press, place. The Stradposters have become an integral part the lives
of of
p. 95-116. many of us. My thanks to Naomi Sadlerfor allowing the Catgut Society
Walks, J., 1659, De Cycloide: Oxford. to use themhere. Dr. Andre P. Earson of the NationalMusic Museum
in Vermillion, South Dakota has kindly givenpermissionfor the use of
arching profiles measured by ]ohn Pringle, andphotographs of various
ACKNO WLEDGMENTS instruments in the collection. A. Thomas King took the photographs,
Shortly after I completed my first piece on cycloid curves in 1999, I and Jeff Eoen drafted several of the charts. Dr. Steven Mann, of the
became aware that the late Tullio Pigoli of Cremona, Italy had written department of Computer Sciences at the University
of Waterloo helped
on this subject in 1984 [10]. Although I reached my conclusions me make the transitionfrom wheels to computer printouts by writing a
independently, there is no doubt that he was thefirst to explore this area. program that even I could use, and has allowedthe use of his website as
It is unfortunate that Liuteria had such limitedcirculation. a source of thatprogram.
John Topham
114 Mid Street, South Nutfield, Redhill, Surrey, RHI 4JH, UK
e-mail: [email protected]
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of how the front of a viokn Figure 2. Schematic representation of the cross-matching of a ring-
is assembled. width sequence taken from a viokn against a reference chronology
constructed from localized material.
j
_
EnDnnimTiiiiii'
Reference Chronology
' DID] ,:: If!) : -
so |
♦
T
; ♦
rings from the oldest part of the piece ofwood to the youngestpart.
. ♦ 4 This is a natural feature of the structure of wood in a tree. A young
JT _o .; a 4
tree has a small diameter and depending on its leaf crown it lays
__ ° ■ !
>s
f|li
4
20
♦ A
#
♦ ♦
♦
!
♦ #
:
down relatively wide rings. As the tree gets older, the tree's diameter
: ! #♦
gets larger and although there is an increase of the generation of
0 1 2 3 4 5 S 7 8 . 10 11 12 13 1. 15 16 17 18
wood mass as the leaf crown expands, this volume is distributed
Years
more thinly around the ever-increasing circumference of the tree's
B. Ring widths are plotted as points. trunk. This gives rise to ever-decreasing ring widths as the tree
grows. This effect is in general quite common but can be very
noticeable on some instruments, for example Stradivari's famous
1716 'Messiah' viokn. The widths of the oldest rings on the front of
this instrument (situated at the outer edges) are between 2 to 2.5
millimetres whereas the widths of the youngest rings (at the centre
of the front) are approximately 0.3 to 0.4 mikimetres. In general,
makers may not have much choice in the matter; however, some
makers appear to choose wood with more variation, others with
Years less. On a viola made by Wilkam Baker in c.1690 the grain of the
C. Lines are added for clarity. bass side of the front varies from just over 3 millimetres to just over
a third of a millimetre (Figure 6). In contrast, although by not
much, on the bass side of a front from a viokn by Carlo Bergonzi
made in 1723 the grain width varies from 1.57 millimetres for the
as the nature of the physical stress underwhich the tree kved. The oldest part to 0.77 millimetres for the youngest (Figure 7).
variation of different carbon isotopes found in each year ring can
also be studied to gain some idea of the sun's activity, which would ESTIMATES OF TIME ALLOWED FOR WOOD SEASONING
have strongly influenced the atmosphere at the time. This has Dendrochronological studies allow us to make some general
allowed researchers to accurately model the climate in particular conclusions about the time allowed for wood seasoning in classic
regions overmany years. Most of these techniques, however, involve instruments. The time period between the youngest ring and the
the destruction of the sample under study. attributed date is determined by two factors: seasoning time before
manufactureand removal of some of the outermost rings during the
For obvious reasons, such information cannot be extracted from planing process prior to joining the front. This number varies widely,
the front of a viokn. The only information available is a series of from a minimum of three years for some instruments by Guarneri
ring-width measurements. For various reasons only the spruce del Gesu [6] to several tens of years for most other makers. The
fronts ofmusical instruments (both plucked and bowedinstruments) frequent short intervals between the youngest ring and date of
can be used for dendrochronological investigation. The other woods manufacture suggest that Cremonese makers made no systematic
used generally either do not show yearly growth, such as tropical attempt to remove sapwood. The short intervals also indicate that
Figure 4. Ring-width sequences taken from two viokns of approximately the same width. The measurements are plotted on the same
vertical scale and positions.
Figure 5. Tree-ring series taken from the fronts of a Barak Norman bass viol and a Giovanni Francesco Pressenda viokn. The viol series
shows an example of relatively sensitive grain and the viokn series shows an example of less sensitive or complacent grain. Both graphs
are plotted to the same vertical scale although they have been displaced vertically to allow better observation.
Figure 6. Sequence taken from the bass side of the front a viola by Wilkam Baker of Oxford, c.1690. The grain widths vary from 3.02mm
to 0.31mm.
2.0 ____: !
VI !
m i r
I 1.0 L
;.
1 i
0.5 !■
1
Figure 7. Sequences taken from the bass side of a front from a viokn by Carlo Bergonzi, 1723.
—
— Bergonzi 1723:bass side
0T
0 T 00 40 m 60 00 00
Years (relative)
Figure 8. Sequences from fronts of the 1711 'Parke' violin, the 1714 'Dolphin' viokn and the 1715 'Marsick' viokn. The bass side is
represented by the top curve for each instrument,
in many cases it was not thought important to allow a long seasoning PROPERTIES OF WOOD FOUND ON INSTRUMENTS BY
period. Guarneri del Gesu has a reputation as a hasty and not overly CLASSICAL MAKERS
careful workman and perhaps the short seasoning time is not Wood properties vary considerably from maker to maker and may
unexpected. However, numerous instruments by Stradivari (noted indicate the resourcefulness of the craftsman. The moie affluent
for meticulous craftsmanship) seem to be made with rather young the maker, the more kkely that he or she may have access to the
wood. The interval between the youngest ring and the date of quality of wood they regard as the best, i.e. wood with perhaps
manufacture of 79 Stradivari instruments varies widely, from 3 to narrow, even year-rings. It may also indicate a particular preference
60 years, with 14 instruments having an interval of between 7and 15 the maker is seeking—one maker perhaps bekeving an open, wide
years [7, B]. This, and other evidence, suggests that extended grain structure will produce better tone, others preferring a denser
seasoning periods were not considered important by classical makers structure.
PI-
Figure 9. Sequences from fronts of the 1719 'Alba' viokn, the 1722 'Conte de Chaponay' viokn and a viokn made in 1717. The bass side
is represented by the top curve for each instrument.
Some makers appear to have either deliberately or inadvertently One thing that could account for this is the way Stradivari may have
adopted particular strategies in the use of their wood. For example, stored the pieces he spkt up. It is possible he spkt logs into thin
the most famous maker of all, Antonio Stradivari, may have been single pieces suitable only for one side. This would have shortened
quite systematic in his use of wood. From about 70 viokns I have the seasoning time, allowing the wood to be used sooner. The
measured so far, it appears that he may have taken logs or bikets of pieces may then have been stored all together but in no particular
wood, spkt them into pieces and used them for a particular period. order. When Stradivari came to join his fronts, he would have
Two periods that most clearly follow this trend are from 1711 to picked out any pair of pieces in no particular order, resulting in the
1716 and 1717 to 1723. Examples of pieces he used from the 1711-16 mix we see today. Since the pieces came from the same log, the pair
period are represented in Figure 8. The graph shows sequences would have looked reasonably well matched but
from three viokns, the 1711 'Parke', the 1714 'Dolphin' and the 1715 dendrochronologically it is easy to see the differences.
'Marsick' viokns. These curves look very similar and upon closer
inspection four prominent narrowrings can be seen at 1639, 1677,
1685 and 1689. Similarly, examples of pieces he used from the 1717- "Stradivari ... would have picked out any pair
-23 period are represented in Figure 9. The graph shows sequences
of pieces in no particular order, resulting in the
from three viokns, the 1719 'Alba', the 1722 'Conte de Chaponay'
viokns and a violin dated 1717. Again the curves are similar to each
mix we see today. "
other, and, upon closer inspection, it can be seen that the most
prominent common characteristic of these curves is the group of In stark contrast, it appears Giuseppe Guarneri del Gesu utilised
narrowrings between 1620 and 1630. What is perhaps not so easy to his wood in a very different way to Stradivari. With evidence from
see is that the statistics do not support the idea that pairs in both 19 instruments in my database, not much of a systematic approach
groups are 'book-matched', i.e. pieces from each pair from each appears to have been adopted. Typical examples from three
instrumentwere taken from adjacent positions in the tree. In fact, it instruments are represented in Figure 10. Each instrument has a
appears that one piece from one instrument is closer to a piece on two-piece front as indicated on Figure 10 by bass and treble sides.
another instrument than they are with their paired piece. For However, not only do none of the pairs match each other, but none
example, the treble side of the 1715 'Marsick' is more similar to the of the pieces very significantly cross-match pieces from other
treble side of the 1711 'Parke' suggesting these are more closely instruments either. On close inspection they cross-match enough
adjacent. Equaky, the bass side of the 1722 'Conte de Chaponay' to fix their positions in time but the differences in the cross-match
more closely matches the treble side of the 1717 violin again strongly indicate that all six pieces came from different trees from
suggesting an adjacent pair. different regions.
Figure 10. Sequences taken from three viokns made by Giuseppe Guarnei del Gesu. It appears that aU six pieces came from different
trees.
treble side
1550 1560 1570 1580 1590 1600 1610 1620 1630 1640 1650 1860 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740
Years (AD)
There are two Guarneri del Gesu instruments in the database that POSSIBLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MODERN AND OLD
do cross-match very well, a 1735viokn and the 1738 D'Egvike viokn, WOOD
and the match suggests that aU four pieces came from the same tree. On a final note, with respect to the way classical makers chose
The sequence of ring-width measurements of the two instruments wood, a recent long discussion has taken place on the musical
are represented in Figure 11. Overall, though, the wood used by instrument web site 'Maestronet' prompted by the question, 'What
Guarneri is quite variedand his choice ofwood appears to be erratic. if Stradivari made a viokn from modern wood?'. The people who
took part appeared divided into two camps, those who bekeved the
In all the dendrochronological studies of instruments, particularly wood used by Stradivari was 'special' in some particular way, and
those made in the classical period in Cremona and elsewhere in those who believed Stradivari could produce an instrument with
northern Italy, no pattern has appeared which may indicate a outstanding tonal qualities, characteristic of his instruments, with
methodical approachrelating to the best configuration for optimum modernwood. Little mention was made of recent objective research,
sound production. It has been considered, particularly in the modern so kttle formal analysis took place. However, new results from the
era, that 'book-matched' pieces especially for the front of the dendrochronology of Stradivari's and other classical Italian
instrument are the best arrangement for good sound production or instrument can provide part of the answer to the above question.
more desirable tone. As shown above with some instruments this
has indeed been the case, but, in general, and more noticeably with
the classical instruments, most makers appear to have paired pieces
with kttle concern for symmetry. In the kght of this knowledge, it
"it may be worth reconsidering the ethos of
is surprising that these instruments have suffered kttle tonaky. On symmetry, and instead opt for a more
the contrary, they have gained the reputation of being some of the abandoned method of pairing pieces"
best instruments ever made. With this in mind, it may be worth
reconsidering the ethos of symmetry, and instead opt for a more
abandoned method of pairing pieces where any two pieces will do According to my recent studies, on a dendrochronological level the
providing they 'look' right together. This variation may add to the wood used by northern Italian violin makers including Stradivari,
idea that either a good sound is in the ear of the beholderrather than other Cremonese and Venetian makers, particularly in the
any particular specific property provided by the wood, or that eighteenth century, is very similar. The wood from instruments
craftsmanship is more influential in achieving a good sound quakty from different makers often cross-matcheach other very significantly
than was previously thought. and is close enough occasionally to suggest the pieces came from
Figure 11. Sequences from two Guarneri del Gesu viokns that show very similar characteristics which suggest that all four pieces came
from the same tree.
trebleside
bass side
trebte sMe
1650 1660 1670 1680 1690 1700 1710 1720 1730 1740
Years (AD)
the same tree. In addition, many of the pieces from Italian wood used by major European makers. From this, one can deduce
instruments, including those made by Stradivari, match wood on that the wood Stradivari used had properties that were similar, if
instruments from different countries such as England and France, not identical, to modern spruce growing under the same conditions.
sometimes very significantly. This suggests that no particular maker In this respect, Stradivari's instruments have no particular tonal
had a secret source of wood known only to him. advantage.
CONCLUSION
"...no particular maker had a secret source of More work is needed to gain better insights into how makers of the
past chose their wood. Research has found that some makers appear
wood known only to him. " to be moderately consistent in the choice of their wood, length of
seasoning, and the way they joined pieces together, yet others appear
to be very erratic. The idea is emerging that the instruments from
According to most research I have seen, most, if not ak, fronts of this period are generally perceived to be of very high quality with
instruments today are made from one species of spruce (Norway respect to tone, appearance, and craftsmanship, almost irrespective
—
spruee Picea abies (L.) Karsten). Sacconi [10] mentioned Stradivari of the choices the maker made for his wood, at least as far as the
using Picea excelsa and, in fact, an unpubkshed paper by Prof. Eko spruces fronts are concerned. These inferences question long held
Corona of the University of Tuscany in Italy suggested that over views, and perhaps this gkmpse of the working practices of some of
thirty species of conifer this might have been used for the the greatest makers can provide a firmer basis for making better
construction of instrument fronts of one kind or another, although instruments in the future.
personally I have seen little evidence of this. According to all the
wood catalogues I have seen Picea excelsa is just another name for REFERENCES
Picea abies, and in spite of descriptions of the use ofmany softwood [1] Klein P., 1989, Dendrochronological analysis of European
species, according to the current dendrochronological evidence it string instruments: CIMCIM Newsletter, p. 37-41.
appears overwhelmingly that Picea abies is the only conifer wood [2] Topham J., and McCormick D., 1998, A dendrochronological
to have been used. investigation of British instruments of the violin family:
Journal of Archaeological Science vol. 25, p. 1149-1157.
Just this one species of spruce grows in the Alps today, as it has for [3] Heron-AUen, E., 1885, Viokn-Making as it was, and is: Ward
thousands of years and the Alps that have provided most of the Lock & Co. Ltd, London, 366 p.
[4] Mockel, 0., & Winkel, F., 1954, Die Kunst dcs Geigenbaues: [8] Topham, J., 2002, A dendrochronological study of instruments
Verlag Bernh. Friedr. Voigt. Berkn, 332 p. by Antonio Stradivari: unpubkshed paper available at http:/
[5] Pollens, S., 1998, The violin forms of Antonio Stradivari: /www.btinternet.com/~j.topham/dendrola.htm
Biddulph, London, 34 p. [9] Topham, J., and McCormick, D., 2000, A Dendrochronological
[6] Klein P., and Pollens S., 1998, The technique of Investigation of Stringed Instruments of the Cremonese School
dendrochronology as applied to violins made by Giuseppe (1666-1757) including "The Messiah" violin attributed to
Guarneri del Gesu: In Giuseppe Guarneri del Gesu (Edited by Antonio Stradivari: Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 27',
Biddulph P.), Peter Biddulph, London, p. 159. p. 183-192
[7] Topham, J., 2001, The dendrochronology of Stradivari's [10] Sacconi, S.F., 1979, The 'secrets' of Stradivari: Libreria Del
viokns: Journal of the Viokn Society of America, Proceedings, Convegno, Cremona, 285 p.
vol. XVII, no. 3, p. 133-179.
DO FLAT-BACK BASSES SOUND DIFFERENT FROM NUMERICAL OPTIMIZATION OF VIOLINS AND BOWS
ARCHED-BACK BASSES? Assistant Prof. Mats Tinnsten; e-mail [email protected]
Andrew Brown; email [email protected] Assistant Prof. Peter Carlsson; e-mail [email protected]
Musical Acoustics Research Institute, (Institut fuer WienerKlangstil) Mid Sweden University
University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna, Austria Dept. of Information Technology and Media
SE-831 25 Ostersund Sweden
Purpose/goals:
This project attempts offer an explanation why the double bass is Project Status: Ongoing projects. Time two years.
the only modern bowed orchestral instrument that has a flat back.
The research starts from current surveys among instrument makers 1. Determination of wood propertiesfor blanks for violin tops
and musicians, and also considers some of the psycho-acoustical How do different parameters affect the vibration properties and the
and room-acoustical characteristics of the double bass that set it characteristics of sounds emanating from viokns (i.e. what makes a
apart form other instruments of the violin family. Finally, good viokn good)? Numericalmodels (FEM, finite element method;
experiments using standard analysis methods and kstening tests are and BEM, boundary elementmethod) of whole viokns and/or parts
being used to look for measurable and audible differences in are created and studied. In the proposed method, a FEM-code is
instrument radiation and tone colour between the two types. linked with a stochastic optimization algorithm in order to
automatically determine material parameters. The method requires
Participants: geometrical dimensions, density, and measured normal modes for
Heinz Fischbach, Ohlstadt, Germany, cello and bass maker, has the blank and it considers the fact that the Young's modulus in the
loaned five new basses that were made especially for this study. longitudinal direction varies in the radial direction.
The design is practically identical except for the backs, three flat
and two round, which faciktate the exchange of the backs as a control 2. Numerical optimization ofviolin top plate thickness and
if desired. The materials of one pair of basses, made of spruce and arching
maple, are quite similar, as are those of a second pair, made of Wood for musical instruments exhibits large variation in the
spruce and poplar. The firm AKG has generously supplied six material parameters, directly influencing the properties of the
good quality microphones. Dr. Peter Donhauser of the Technical vibrating structure. The objective of this project is to show that it is
www.catgutacoustical.org
The exhibitionis dedicated to the kfe and work of Jacob Stainer I OCH 1
(c. 1617-1683), the preeminent violin maker of the German-
speaking region. The exhibition will feature instruments by
Stainer, and items that give an impression of his cultural and KTH
social environment and the musical kfe in Innsbruck in the 17th
century. Part of the exhibit will concentrate on new biographi-
cal information about Stainer. More than 120 newly discov- ♦ STOCKHOLM MUSIC ACOUSTICS CONFERENCE2003
ered documents shed light on his trial for heresy, and how (SMAC 03)
Stainer defended himself. August 6 - 9,2003
The Catgut Acoustical Society is pleased to be a sponsor of the
One room will be dedicated to methods of documentation. Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference 2003. Organized by
Simple methods (drawings, templates, measuring devices) are the Music Acoustics Group at the Dept. of Speech, Music and
opposed to more sophisticated (UV-light, dendrochronology) Hearing, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm,
and high-tech (laser-vibrometry, sound analysis). An audio- Sweden.
guide will provide oral information together with music
samples recorded with Stainer's instruments. The catalogue SMC 03 will consolidate the tradition initiated by SMAC 83
will comprise articles of scholarly nature, descriptions, and and SMAC 93 with a major conference on musical acoustics in
color photographs. Articles will be in German with English Stockholm every 10th year. Like earker SMACs this conference
summaries. A CD will be recorded with mainly solo-pieces, will present contributions from the entire field of musical
played on four instruments: two viokns, violoncello, and viola acoustics.
da gamba.
Further information is available at:
A total of 160 items are on display, including 57 musical instru- http://www.speech.kth.se/smaco3/
ments (20 by Stainer). The selection of Stainer's instruments email: [email protected]
Knut Guettler
The ISMA'O2 in Mexico City took place at The National Academy there a good way of displaying how the sound is produced in, say, a
of Music (ENM, Escuela Nacional de Musica) in Coyoacan (near trumpet or clarinet?", etc., etc.
to the Frida Kahlo museum). The Academy is wek suited for events
of this kind, and it was nice to observe that music students had been Several inventive solutions to these and similar questions were
invited to attend the presentations, an opportunity many of them presented in the course of the symposium. To mention but two
found appealing throughout the symposium. In that respect the names: Ana Barjau of the Polytechnical University of Catalunya,
symposium's official theme: "Musical Acoustics and an Interactive (Barcelona, Spain) who presented analyses and computer-aided
Musical Instruments Museum" often provided more accessible, less design techniques for wind instrument reconstruction—even for
technical presentations than are normaky experienced at the ISMA missing parts, and Murray Campbell of University of Edinburgh
meetings. Two other pronounced topics were music education, (U.K.) who showed real-time split-screens of waveforms, spectra
and neuroscience related to music perception and imagery. This and envelopes while his instruments were played by artificial lips
widening of ISMA's scope was in many ways reflecting the made from water-filled party balloons! Museums are traditionally
impressive multifaceted qualifications of the two organizers. Mguel facing a tradeoff between the conversation discipline—wanting to
Zenker—who besides being an educated luthier, is professor of keep the instruments unused—and the interests of musicians,
music at ENM, and one of the directors of its Laboratory for Musical musicologists and others who want preserveits sound by maintaining
Informatics and Electronic Music. Eduardo Castro-Sierra is head its playing functionality and a certain accessibility. Several papers
of the Laboratory of Psychoacoustics & Auditory Physiology at were devoted to this problem on a more philosophic basis.
Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez, a health institute
providing special education, and medical and surgical care to
children of kmited economic means. Besides being an M.D. with a Our amiable hosts, Miguel Zenker (left) and Dr. Eduardo Castro-
Ph.D. in the Hearing and Speech Sciences, Castro-Sierra is a contract Sierra created a relaxed atmosphere and provided a variedprogram,
professor of Psychoacoustics, Musical Acoustics and Comparative including performances of Mexican music in classical and
Phonetics and Phonology at ENM, with a Ph.D. in music from that traditional styles.
same academy.
GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING PAPERS kne drawings are acceptable; low-resolution graphic images copied
We invite submission of technical papers, short notes, book reviews, from web pages and low-quality photocopies of illustrations are
obituaries, letters, and comments. Articles should not exceed 6000 unacceptable. Graphic images should be formatted to near standard
words, equivalent to approximately 6 Journal pages, including column widths (3.5 or 7.0 inches) and saved or scanned at high
graphics. Book reviews and notes should be kmited to 1000 words. (300 dpi) resolution, preferably in .tiff format. Please include
Please consult a recent copy of the Journal for guideknes as to style. graphics files on disk separately from text; do not imbed images in
word-processing documents such as Word or Word Perfect.
Initial submissions can be in the form of hard copy, fax, 3V2—inch
floppy disk, CD-ROM, or email attachment. Please note that final Please send 3 paper copies of submitted articles to CAS Office, 55
copy must be provided as a TEXT file (.txt, text only) rather than as Park Street, Montclair, N.J. 07042 U.S.A., fax (973) 744-0375,
a native file from a word processing program. However, hard copy e-mail [email protected]. The Journal Editor can be contacted at
should be provided that reflects all special characters and desired [email protected].
formatting, superscripts, etc. so that our printer can accurately
reproduce those features. Clean black and white photographs and