Scribd
Upload
199 views1 page

Bigamy Case: Mercado v. Mercado Ruling

Dr. Vincent Mercado was married to Thelma Oliva in 1976 but later married Consuelo Tan in 1991 without divorcing Oliva. Tan charged Mercado with bigamy. Mercado then sought to have his marriage to Oliva declared null and void. The court ruled that Mercado was guilty of bigamy because he entered into a second marriage before obtaining a judicial declaration that his first marriage was void, even if the first marriage was void from the beginning. A final judgment annulling the previous marriage is required before entering a new marriage, otherwise bigamy has been committed.

Uploaded by

Ramon Certeza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
199 views1 page

Bigamy Case: Mercado v. Mercado Ruling

Dr. Vincent Mercado was married to Thelma Oliva in 1976 but later married Consuelo Tan in 1991 without divorcing Oliva. Tan charged Mercado with bigamy. Mercado then sought to have his marriage to Oliva declared null and void. The court ruled that Mercado was guilty of bigamy because he entered into a second marriage before obtaining a judicial declaration that his first marriage was void, even if the first marriage was void from the beginning. A final judgment annulling the previous marriage is required before entering a new marriage, otherwise bigamy has been committed.

Uploaded by

Ramon Certeza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Issue
  • Ruling
  • Facts

Mercado v.

Mercado
G.R. No. 137110, 1 August 2000

FACTS:

Dr. Vincent Mercado was previously married with Thelma Oliva in 1976 before he contracted marriage with Consuelo
Tan in 1991 which the latter claims she did not know. Tan filed bigamy against Mercado and after a month the latter
filed an action for declaration of nullity of marriage against Oliva. The decision in 1993 declared marriage between
Mercado and Oliva null and void.

ISSUE:

Whether Mercado committed bigamy in spite of filing the declaration of nullity of the former marriage.

RULING:

Yes. Mercado is guilty of bigamy.

The law provides that: “The absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for  purposes of remarriage on
the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void.” A judicial declaration of nullity of a
previous marriage is necessary before a subsequent one can be legally contracted. One who enters into a
subsequent marriage without first obtaining such judicial declaration is guilty of bigamy. This principle applies even if
the earlier union is characterized by the statute as “void.”

In the case at bar, Mercado only filed the declaration of nullity of his marriage with Oliva right after Tan filed bigamy
case. Hence, by then, the crime had already been consummated. He contracted second marriage without the judicial
declaration of the nullity. The fact that the first marriage is void from the beginning is not a defense in a bigamy
charge.

You might also like