TITLE:
Importance of International Expansion
Course Title: Strategic Management
Course Code: MF 616
Submitted By-
Nazim Nazmul, Roll – 573
EMBA, Session-2019-2020
Batch-23rd (Executive for Engineers)
Major: Finance
Date of Submission- 01st February 2021
I declare that this assignment is entirely my own work and I have
acknowledged all the materials used from the published or unpublished works
of other people. All references have been duly cited
Faculty of Business Administration
University of Science and Technology Chittagong
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ILLUSTRATIONS.............................................................................................................3
ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………...5
1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................6
1.2 Background…………………………………………………………………..6
1.3 Problem Discussion ……………………………………………....................7
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE.........................................................................................10
2.1 Foreign Market Expansion Strategy.…….......................................................10
2.1.2 Diversification..................................................................................12
2.2 Foreign Market Entry Strategy.......................................................................14
2.2.1 Export...............................................................................................14
2.2.2 Foreign Direct Investment…………………...................................15
2.3 Conceptual Framework………………….......................................................15
3. CONCLUSION…………………………....................................................................16
REFERANCES………………………………………………………………………….18
ILLUSTRATIONS
2
Page
Table 1. Conceptual Framework………………………………………....................................5
Abstract
3
The augmented developments of technology and falling barriers of trade are encouraging firms
everywhere the globe to internationalize. Not solely international firms however additionally
little and medium-sized enterprises achieve conducting business on foreign markets. once
deciding to internationalize, little and medium-sized enterprises face the requirement to develop
a distant market growth strategy similarly as a distant market entry strategy. Market growth ways
treat of the number of markets to enter and therefore the temporal approach chosen. the most
ways are country diversification and country concentration. A market entry strategy contains the
amount of commitment of resources planned for every market. Typical entry modes are export
and foreign direct investment. This analysis explains the interrelations inside and between
market growth ways and market entry ways. Our aim was to achieve deeper understanding
regarding the chances for tiny and medium-sized enterprises to mix market growth with market
entry ways. For that we tend to conduct a case study of a Swedish firm that's active on
international markets. As a result, we tend to note that the mixture of market growth and market
entry ways will diverge from theory. a very important issue touching a firm’s alternative of ways
is that the money background.
Key words: market expansion strategy, market entry strategy, internationalization, small and
medium-sized enterprises, export, foreign direct investment.
Acknowledgements
4
For my support in writing the thesis, I like to thank Flora Bendt and Malgorzata Skropskafor. We
also thank our interviewees for giving useful insights into the choices that a business must take in
selecting its market growth and market entry strategies.
Nazim 2021
1. Introduction
5
This chapter will introduce the main topic that will be researched throughout the report. It starts
with a background and is followed by a problem discussion.
1.1 Background
The globalization increases in today’s business society. Internet and other communication
systems, fast travel and low tariff barriers accelerate the global business (Czinkota 2001).
Individual business needs to follow the development of new competitive advantages such as
international relationships. The strategic choice of how to expand to new geographical markets
has remarkable influence on a company’s performance (Hollensen 2003). Constant and easy
access to information simplifies a firm’s opportunities to internationalize. Also, the fast-
technological improvements will create new opportunities for companies in the future (Gillespie,
Jeannet &Hennessey 2004). Smaller companies have gained better access and opportunities to
enter foreign markets through globalization (Knight 2001). SME is an abbreviation for small and
medium sized companies. It refers to companies in all industries as long as a given size is not
exceeded. The main criteria for a SME is to have less than 250 workers, a maximum of 40
million euros annual turn over and owning managers or their families as managers (Knight 2001;
EC 2005). One question that comes up is how SMEs may enter foreign markets to reach new
customers. There are great gaps between countries considering technology. Constant innovation
and technological leadership can be a starting point for growing companies to obtain a niche and
gain market shares (OECD 1997). Though, entering and establishing on foreign markets is a
complicated process affected by factors such as the choice of multidimensional competitive
strategies (Bradley 2005)
6
To be successful in new markets, managers should formulate an appropriate market expansion
and market entry strategy. Bradley (2005) and Hollensen (2003) point out the first decision to
make is the type and number of markets to expand into before determining a concrete entry
strategy. The definition of market is broad; therefore, this thesis defines market as one foreign
country throughout the whole paper. This research places emphasis on SMEs' process of
internationalization. More specifically, the relationship of foreign market expansion strategies
and foreign market entry strategies shall be analyzed by comparing their degree of flexibility,
risk and control. Here, the ability to react on altering circumstances on the international market
determines the level of flexibility. Risk is defined as the risk to lose financial investments a
company undertakes when entering a foreign market. How high control a company has is
determined by the level of influence to affect the foreign market but also physical presence.
1.2 Problem Discussion
Ayal and Zif (1979) define two major expansion strategies a firm can choose between market
diversification and market concentration. in an exceedingly concentration strategy, a firm directs
all or most of its recourses to one or some markets. during this strategy, an SME chooses to
pursue an oversized share of 1 or some submarkets because it is predicated on a long-term view
of opportunities in international markets. The SME is more dedicated to constructing close
contact with customers, suppliers, and distributors. Prices are determined with an objective of
sales growth, therefore a corporation is over willing to sacrifice its short-term profits (Bradley
2005). Advantages with a amount strategy are gaining great market knowledge and a high level
of control that's obtained through the physical presence on the market. However, to enter a
7
distant market, heavy investments are required which might be described as a high financial risk.
Furthermore, concentration strategy implies grade of low flexibility concerning the flexibility to
react to a sudden decrease of a market's demand (Hollensen 2003).
Diversification strategy allows the SME to penetrate an oversized number of markets. Bradley
(2005) portrays the strategy's intention to be generating a high profit at low costs. Advantages
with diversification strategy are a high level of flexibility and rapid obtainment of competitive
advantages. in step with Hollensen (2003), the strategy may be a risky option when expanding to
a replacement market with a replacement product because of operating in unfamiliar territory.
Moreover, the corporate doesn't operate physically within the foreign market which provides
them low control. However, diversification is a positive move to enlarge the demand of existing
capability within the corporate. Furthermore, an occasional level of investments reduces the
financial risks when expanding internationally.
According to Ayal and Zif (1979), the 2 expansion strategies converge towards one another
within the future. Still, it's only possible to conduct one expansion strategy at a time (Ibid). An
SME's strategic choice whether to conduct market concentration or market diversification doesn't
exclude the international expansion problems which will emerge. Both strategies have strengths
and weaknesses which makes it very difficult for the company's decision-maker to seek out the
link between the SME's situation and a possible strategy (Bradley 2005).
Another consideration must be exhausted terms of a fitting market entry strategy. Hereby, people
answerable must decide about the desirability and potential of flexibility, risk, and control on an
overseas market (Bradley 2005; Hollensen 2001). Market entry strategies reach from export over
8
franchising, licensing, and joint ventures to foreign direct investment (FDI). per Bradley (2005),
there's a robust relationship between market expansion strategy and market entry strategy. the 2
commonest market entry strategies for SMEs are export and FDI (Lu & Beamish 2006).
Export includes rock bottom level of risk and control, at the identical time, it's considered to be
the best way for companies to require the primary step to enter a brand new market (Lu &
Beamish 2006). Small and medium-sized firms have few resources to attempt to the design and
implementation of internationalization processes. By not investing in foreign subsidiaries and
markets the financial risk for the corporate is restricted. Another advantage is that the high
flexibility. just in case of any political or legal changes adversarial to the firm’s business a quick
withdrawal from the market is feasible still as specializing in other attractive markets. Exporting
could be a fast way of entering new markets, also because the SME supplies other markets by
using existing production locations rather than building new ones abroad. With a coffee level of
investments and fast access to foreign markets export could be a likely entry strategy to attain
high sales volume (Lu & Beamish 2006).
Foreign direct investment on the opposite hand is an entry strategy with a high level of control
and risk and low flexibility. By establishing sales subsidiaries in target markets the firm is
confronted with the requirement for major investments (Bradley 2005). Advantages with FDI are
connected to the SME’s position within the foreign market. Business relations to local
competitors, clients and distributors are usually closer and easier to develop. Therewith, the
corporate can easier overcome the “liability of foreignness” (Zaheer 1995). Furthermore, FDI
holds the potential for a SME to realize valuable knowledge about operating in foreign markets.
9
This organizational learning may be useful for further internationalization intentions (Lu &
Beamish 2006).
Considering market entry strategies several authors determine an inclination of adjusting them
hooked in to developing factors like market knowledge, experience and financial resources
(Bradley 2005; Bilkey & Tesar 1977). After creating preconditions, a corporation may gain
advantage from more complex entry strategies than export. in line with Bradley (2005) this is
able to display the event of entry strategies starting with export and ending with FDI.
2. Literature Review
This chapter will cover the main theories regarding SMEs that are going to operate
internationally. First an overview of the internalized world is presented followed by possible
reasons for companies to expand. Finally, market expansion strategy and market entry are
analyzed.
2.1 Foreign market expansion strategy
Different factors influence the critical decision of selecting a market expansion strategy (Ayal &
Zif 1979). the most question the firm must answer is that if they're trying to get many markets at
the identical time or concentrate their expansion to 1 country. In other words, they have to work
out if they enter markets simultaneously or incrementally (Hollensen 2003). It is more preferable
for a corporation to enter one smaller market if it's no experience of foreign markets. A firm can
10
effectively gain knowledge to gradually enter more countries (Hollensen 2003). This strategy is
particularly advisable for companies that enter international markets late and already face hard
competition concerning local competitors (Gupta & Govindarajan 2000). Also, smaller
companies with limited resources, companies which require to expand so as to survive, favor to
enter one or only a few markets gradually. This choice is more preferable than committing them
to expanding into too many markets at the identical time. Though, there are companies that need
a more rapid entry into the world’s markets to achieve the maximum amount as possible from an
emerging opportunity like preventing competition (Ayal & Zif 1979). Another factor
recommending companies to decide on this strategy is that they obtain experience quickly on
many markets; enabling them to attain economies of scale in production and marketing (Bradley
2005). this can be made by integrating and consolidating operations across the various foreign
markets. Thus, it will be added that to forestall competitors the corporate has got to be a style of
an innovative or very significant technological advanced firm. To enter markets simultaneously,
financial and managerial resources a required (Hollensen 2003).
SMEs have a look at their own domestic market as a chance to create their resources that later
may be used when expanding internationally. The companies' strategy should be focused on its
core competence that may give the corporate competitive advantages abroad (Knight, 2001). the
foremost natural choice for SMEs to expand is thru an incremental strategy, entering one country
after the opposite. Thereby, companies try and guarantee consolidation and profitability before
they enter new markets. A typical lack of resources is one reason for SMEs’ preference of
choosing this expansion strategy (Hollensen 2003).
11
The following subsections outline the 2 varieties of market expansion strategies: concentration
and diversification. As earlier mentioned, market could be a definition which will cover Western
Europe or one single country. during this thesis markets are considered as countries. Thus, the
term market and country have the identical meaning.
2.1.1 Diversification
This strategy sets a relatively equal spread of resources across many various markets. Market
diversification strategy is characterized by a quick rate of growth in a very number of markets
selected and entered in early stages of the expansion of the corporate (Ayal & Zif 1979). the
amount of commitment of resources and management is incredibly low. Advantages of this
strategy are flexibility, a reduced concentration and the simplest way to hastily capitalize
noteworthy competitive advantages. The commodities related to this strategy are standard
products that meet the desired general market preferences (Bradley 2005). a quick rate is
obtained by entering many markets at the identical time (Katsikeas & Leonidou 1996). More
specifically, the corporate can enter parts of the markets with limited resources and time.
Companies choosing diversification are generally looking for a market that offers them high
financial dividends. Therefore it's very likely that a number of the entered markets aren't
profitable and therefore the company will drop out of those markets and target those that
generate highest revenues (Bradley 2005).
Flexibility
12
Diversification strategy provides an organization with flexibility thanks to diversified
investments. SMEs are more flexible on different markets compared to large companies
(Hollensen 2003). Closing down a business in one market to enter another is fairly easy (Bradley
2005).
Risk
The risks when choosing diversification strategy are fairly low. Risks are primarily a definition
on the performance level of an organization using the diversification strategy (Lee & Jang 2007).
When a corporation operates in many markets at the identical time, one downfall of 1 market can
easily be compensated through by growth in another market (Ayal & Zif 1979). Another factor
influencing the reduction of risk is that the general revenue may be stabilized through operating
on several markets. to cut back risks even more studies show that choosing countries just like the
domestic markets ease the company's entrance on the foreign market furthermore as activity of
business (Hirsch & Lev 1971). The two growth methods, as analyzed above, are distinct in the
short term. However, by looking at the implementation of plans from a long-term viewpoint,
parallels tend to appear.
2.2 Foreign market entry strategy
After a firm has analyzed which markets to enter it's to come to a decision how these should be
entered (Bradley 2005). reckoning on the character of the chosen market expansion strategy a
fitting market entry strategy must be picked so as to form a coherent set of selling and
organizational activities. There are two main approaches when deciding what entry strategy to
use. Either the choice is predicated on experience or on analysis. Of course, a mixture of both
13
approaches is feasible (Albaum 1998). Market entry strategies reach from export over
franchising, licensing and joint ventures to sales subsidiaries and production subsidiaries on a
distant market. Regarding literature, market entry strategies strongly vary in their level of
involved flexibility and therefore the degree of risk and control (Hollensen 2001; Bradley 2005).
The degree of risk and control increases while the intensity flexibility to react to altering
circumstances in markets decrease as a firm improves its market entry strategy over time
(Bradley 2005).
The next segment reflects on the multiple business entry characteristics. As this report focuses on
the two most common methods, the review is carried out of exports and foreign direct
investment. The next segment reflects on the multiple business entry characteristics. As this
report focuses on the two most common methods, the review is carried out of exports and foreign
direct investment.
2.2.1 Export
Generally, any sales activity on international markets is described as export. Here, export as
entry strategy shall be defined as sale of unchanged products and services to non domestic
markets via foreign based agents or distributors (Albaum 1998). By using international agents or
distributors, a firm gets affordable access to exclusive market knowledge without self analyzing
the country, culture, national politics, laws and native customer (Ibid). Thus, the cooperation
with foreign based agents or distributors is favorable for firms committed to direct export but
inexperienced in doing business outside known markets (Albaum 1998). These considerations
14
cause the idea that export including foreign based agents or distributors may be a suitable entry
strategy for SMEs.
2.2.2 Foreign direct investment (FDI)
Establishing a subsidiary abroad comes together with high investments in new properties,
marketing, and human resources (Bradley 2005). Differences in language, culture taste, logistics
and laws have to be analyzed so as to begin and conduct successful business on the foreign
market (Verwaal & Donkers, 2002). this happens especially when FDI is chosen as entry
strategy.
2.3 Conceptual framework
Based this conceptual framework on the theories reviewed above. Figure 1 shall illustrate the
interrelations within and between the market strategies. The arrow between export and foreign
direct investment show SMEs’ tendency to evolve their market entry strategy from starting by
export to establishing foreign sales subsidiaries (Johanson & Vahlne 1977; Bradley 2005). The
connection between the market expansion strategies is clarified by two arrows. As they're
positioned towards one another the arrows outline the long-term convergence of the 2 market
expansion strategies (Ayal & Zif, 1979). The interrupted lines between the 2 boxes demonstrate
the connections between the market expansion and market entry strategies. Since export and
diversification moreover as foreign direct investment and concentration show alike levels of
flexibility, risk and control, they're connected and positioned on the identical height. Since the
15
third research question targets the relation of several entry strategies to at least one expansion
strategy, the lines are interrupted.
Foreign Direct Concentration
Investment
Export Diversification
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework
Source: Authors construction based on literature from Ayal and Zif (1979), Bradley (2005), Johanson and
Vahlne (1977)
3. Conclusion
Companies in general prefer to enter markets that rank high in attractiveness, low in market risk
and where they can enjoy a competitive advantage. Even though classified as high-risk
environments, it is demanded to do further consideration in the development of international
operations and offer research ground for the study of market selection within an increasingly
challenging global market environment. Lack of a specialized approach to assess their potential
may be one reason why most firms overlook opportunities in expansion. It is proposed that the
application of the additional criteria will compensate for the go-no-go approach taken by the
16
normative market selection methods by providing a matter-of-fact exposure and will complement
them in preliminary assessment before the immediate measures of macro-economic variables,
country risk and profit conversion potential.
References
Albaum, G., Strandskov, J. & Duerr, E., 1998. International marketing and export management.
3rd ed. Harlow: Addison Wesley.
17
Ayal, I. & Zif, J., 1979. Market Expansion Strategies in Multinational Marketing. Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 43(2), p. 84-94.
Baird, I. S., Lyles, M. A., Orris, J. B., 1994. The choice of international strategies by
small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management Vol. 32(1) p. 48-59
Berg B. L., 2001. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Bilkey, W. J. & Tesar, G., 1977. The export behavior of smaller sized Wisconsin manufacturing
firms. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 8(1), p. 93-98.
Bradley, F., 2005. International Marketing Strategy. 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Buckley, P. & Casson, M., 1998. Analyzing Foreign Market Entry Strategies: Extending the
Internalization Approach. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 29(3), p. 539- 561.
Cooper D. R.& Schindler P.S., 1998. Business research methods. 6th ed. Irwin/McGraw- Hill.
Cooper, R.G.& Kleinschmidt, E. J., 1985. The Impact of Export Strategy on Export Sales
Performance. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 16(1), p. 37-55.
Czinkota, M. R., 2007. International Marketing. 8th ed. Mason: Thomson/South Western.
Daniels, J.D.& Radenbaugh, L.H., 2001. International Business. 9th ed. London: Prentice Hall.
EC, 2005. The new SME definition: user guide and model declaration. Luxembourg: European
Commission.
18
Forsgren, M., 2002. The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: a
critical review. International Business Review, Vol. 11(3), p. 257-277.
Gillespie, K., Jeannet, J.-P. & Hennessey, H. D., 2004. Global marketing: an interactive
approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Gupta, A. K. & Govindarajan, V., 2000. Managing Global Expansion: A Conceptual
Framework. Business Horizons, Vol. 43(2), p. 45-54.
Hirsch, S. & Lev, B., 1971. Sales Stabilization Through Export Diversification. The Review of
Economics and Statistics, Vol. 53(3), p. 270-277.
Hollensen, S., 2001. Global Marketing- a market-responsive approach. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice
Hall.
Hollensen, S., 2003. Marketing Management- a relationship approach. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Holme, I. M. & Solvang B. K, 1997. Forskningsmetodik- om kvalitativa och kvantitativa
metoder. 2nd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Hoskisson, R. O. & Johnson, R. A., 1992. Corporate Restructuring and Strategic Change: The
Effect on Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity. Stratagic Management Journal, Vol.
13(8), p. 625-634.
Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J.-E., 1997. The Internationalization Process of the Firm- A Model of
Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International
Business Studies, Vol. 8(1), p. 23-32.
19
Katsikeas, C. S. & Leonidou, L. C., 1996. Export Market Expansion Strategy: Differences
Between Market Concentration and Market Spreading. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol.
12, p. 113-143.
Knight, G.A., 2001. Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME. Journal of
International Management. Vol. 7(3), p.155-171.
Lee C. S. & Yang Y. S., 1990. Impact of Export Market Expansion Strategy on Export
Performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 3(1), p. 29-39.
Lee, J. M. & Jang, S. C., 2007. Market diversification and financial performance and stability: A
study of hotel companies. International Journal of Hospitality Management. Vol. 26(2), p. 362-
375.
Lu, J. & Beamish P., 2006. SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs. profitability.
Journal of International Entrepreneurship. Vol. 4(1), p. 27-48.
Naidu, M. G. & Prasad, V. K., 1994. Predictors of Export strategy and performance of small- and
medium-sized firms. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 31(2-3), p. 107-115.
OECD, 1997. Globalization and Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs), Paris:
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill A., 2007. Research Methods for Business Students. 4th ed.
Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Sekaran, U., 2000. Research Methods for Business- A Skill-Building Approach. 3rd ed. John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.
20
UNCTAD, 2007. World investment report 2007- Transnational Corperations, Extractive
Industries and Development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, New York
and Geneva.
Verwaal E. & Donkers, B., 2002. Firm Size and Export Intensity: Solving an Empirical Puzzle.
Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 33(3), p. 603-613.
Yin, R. K., 1994. Case study research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Zaheer, S., 1995. Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness. The Academy of Management
Journal, Vol. 38(2), p. 341-363.
21