Scribd
Upload
139 views1 page

GSIS Property Tax Exemption Case

GSIS owned two properties in Manila that were subjected to unpaid real property taxes by the city. GSIS protested, claiming it was exempt from such taxes. The RTC denied GSIS' petition, but GSIS appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that GSIS is exempt from real property taxes on the two properties based on PD 1146 and RA 8291. These laws grant GSIS a tax exemption and restore its exempt status. The properties, though owned by GSIS, are actually owned by the Republic as GSIS is merely a trustee and the properties were ceded or acquired for the pension system with disposal done by or through the President.

Uploaded by

Rodney Santiago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
139 views1 page

GSIS Property Tax Exemption Case

GSIS owned two properties in Manila that were subjected to unpaid real property taxes by the city. GSIS protested, claiming it was exempt from such taxes. The RTC denied GSIS' petition, but GSIS appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that GSIS is exempt from real property taxes on the two properties based on PD 1146 and RA 8291. These laws grant GSIS a tax exemption and restore its exempt status. The properties, though owned by GSIS, are actually owned by the Republic as GSIS is merely a trustee and the properties were ceded or acquired for the pension system with disposal done by or through the President.

Uploaded by

Rodney Santiago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Case Details

GSIS vs.

City Treasurer and Assessor of Manila


GR No. 186242, December 23, 2009
Facts:
GSIS owned two properties in the City of Manila. Thereafter, the said properties
were subjected to real property tax. The City issued a letter pertaining to the unpaid real
property taxes and in which included therein that should GSIS fail to pay, levy shall be
made unto its properties. GSIS protested the said collection and contended that it is
exempt from tax. GSIS then filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition with the RTC to
enjoin the levy and collection of the respondent city. RTC denied the petition for lack of
merit. The case was then raised to the Supreme Court. The respondent counters that
the LGC withdraws the exemption granted to the GSIS.
Issue:
Whether or not the subject properties owned by GSIS is subject to real property
tax.
Held:
No.
Pursuant to Sec. 33 of PD 1146, GSIS enjoyed tax exemption from real estate
taxes, among other tax burdens, until January 1, 1992 when the LGC took effect and
withdrew exemptions from payment of real estate taxes privileges granted under PD
1146; RA 8291 restored in 1997 the tax exempt status of GSIS by reenacting under its
Sec. 39 what was once Sec. 33 of P.D. 1146.
The subject properties under GSIS’s name are likewise owned by the Republic.
The GSIS is but a mere trustee of the subject properties which have either been ceded
to it by the Government or acquired for the enhancement of the system. This particular
property arrangement is clearly shown by the fact that the disposal or conveyance of
said subject properties are either done by or through the authority of the President of
the Philippines. Specifically, in the case of the Concepcion-Arroceros property, it was
transferred, conveyed, and ceded to this Court on April 27, 2005 through a presidential
proclamation, Proclamation No. 835. Pertinently, the text of the proclamation announces
that the Concepcion-Arroceros property was earlier ceded to the GSIS on October 13,
1954 pursuant to Proclamation No. 78 for office purposes and had since been titled to
GSIS which constructed an office building thereon. Thus, the transfer on April 27, 2005
of the Concepcion-Arroceros property to this Court by the President through
Proclamation No. 835.

You might also like